Visions of the Future (TV Mini Series 2007– ) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Overrated commercial for fortune telling
rgcustomer30 June 2011
That my review is negative should be no surprise. This series is less about science and more about wide-eyed speculation about what might happen if everything goes unusually perfectly, with typically low amounts of time given to discussing the possible negative effects before they happen. Apparently we don't want to be a party pooper.

This is exactly the kind of almost magical thinking about engineering that got us into the trouble we have today (fuel scarcity, pollution, destruction of environmental resources, cities that alienate people, etc.) These folks (as a category) have a lot to answer for, and they want to be trusted with artificial life, nanoparticles, and other creations? No. It's time to slow way down, and ensure that we actually know what we're doing, before we screw it up.

Given that, I was very bored by the middle of the second episode. You can only watch these people brag about the unknown future for so long. I did finish the miniseries, and thought each episode was slightly better than the one before it, but I cannot recommend it overall.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Important issues tackled in a rather mediocre manner.
Innsmouth_Apprentice11 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Unreasonably fearful stance. A question like "When I am cybernetically enhanced, how will I know where my self begins and ends?" rings contrived and empty to me. A statement like "In the coming age, there will be winners and losers" is so painfully obvious that it should not be uttered by anyone ever. The scruples about getting tested for genetic predispositions to disease, on the grounds that "What if it shows something bad? I'd have to make some adjustments, and talk to my family about it (the horror!)" border on the ludicrous. It's hard to discern how much of this Michio sincerely thinks/feels, as opposed to purposely dumbing the material down for the audience, but what matters is the result: a documentary with an extremely simplistic and conservative viewpoint. To compound the issue, Michio gets a lot of commentators with narrow, paranoid views of the occurring progress. It's not illuminating or even pleasant to listen to these people who are hopelessly behind the times.

A note to Biotech Revolution: Joel Garreau, who has written a book called "Radical Evolution", says: that "Humans will be the first species to take control of their own evolution." The problem with that statement is the lack of a sense of continuity. Bacteria have been able to directly incorporate new DNA segments into their genomes for billions of years. Modifying and improving DNA is what life DOES. Or, more precisely, DNA has always modified and improved itself. It's just that now it has created humans to streamline the process.

6/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Review of part 1 "The Intelligence Revolution"
robotbling4 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
(www.plasticpals.com) Visions of the Future is a three part mini-series hosted by Dr. Michio Kaku, produced by the BBC in 2007. The first part is titled The Intelligence Revolution, with Kaku making a broad range of predictions fueled by the exponential growth in information technology, particularly the power of ubiquitous computing. He's joined by his buddy Ray Kurzweil (inventor and futurist). Unfortunately, the majority of the first twenty minutes are bogged down by the concept of "virtual reality". Online games are used as stand-ins, and they simply aren't as groundbreaking as the show would have you believe. Watching Kaku's avatar fly around the cheesy virtual worlds as he espouses their grandiose possibilities is rather embarrassing.

At the midway point Kaku gets to the robots, and a little more down to earth. He begins with a short demonstration of modular robots before delving into object recognition by computer vision. He then visits Honda's headquarters in Japan, where ASIMO serves him a drink. He points to Shintoism (the belief that even inanimate objects can possess a soul) to explain the general acceptance of robots in Japan, which is unique among the documentaries I've reviewed. The real problem of how to develop strong artificial intelligence is largely glossed over.

At this point, Kaku touches on the special qualities of intelligent machines and how we relate to them. People will project a personality onto a robot as unintelligent and unnatural as the Roomba vacuum cleaner, so it's only natural that more lifelike robots have a profound psychological effect on us. Here the SONY AIBO and QRIO are used as examples of robots that have been designed to win our hearts, and are surprisingly effective at doing so. But, Kaku says, robots that take advantage of our tendency to anthropomorphize objects will need emotions of their own if they are to make intelligent decisions, particularly when it comes to social interactions.

The episode ends with an examination of what may happen if artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence, and how we are beginning to merge with technology. Rather than trotting out the oft-used example of retinal implants, here deep brain stimulation demonstrates how technology may improve or mend biological deficiencies. Like Future Fantastic, this is a mini-series that attempts to draw the viewer in with big promises about the future, but ultimately regurgitates the same overly-optimistic predictions we've heard countless times before. For that reason I can't recommend it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed