Interceptor (2022) Poster

(2022)

User Reviews

Review this title
949 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Cheesy harmless fun!
whatgift10 June 2022
This Australian production harks back to the B-movie days with all the necessary elements - silly improbable story, bad acting, poor American accents and some questionable special effects.

But you know what? This was fun to watch, more so than some big budget action movies. It knows what it is and doesn't try to hide it in any way. The fact that Chris Hemsworth hams it up alongside his wife is testament to that.

The fight scenes are fairly decent and there's some decent depictions of violence as well.

If you go in knowing what you're in for, you may just find yourself enjoying this!
53 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A poorly done female led Die Hard clone
siderite6 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I thought that Elsa Pataky was OK in this film. She was not great, but she did well enough. Luke Bracey as the villain kind of takes the spotlight for charm, too. But that's as much as I can say that is positive about the film. The plot is ludicrous, from the main story to the smallest details that they get so wrong. The acting, other than what I mentioned, is bad. Some characters are completely useless, you see them then they just vanish. The dialogue is clunky. The budget must have been minuscule, too. And producer Chris Hemsworth's cameo in it is pretty much offensive. Not more than the ending, though.

What is it about? A female U. S. captain who speaks English with a heavy Spanish accent is reassigned to a nuke interception station in the middle of the ocean as punishment for metooing a three star general. There she has to pretty much singlehandedly foil an assault by hostile forces that want to nuke the U. S. In the middle, we get to talk about the state of the nation and touch on important things as sexism and red neck racism.

The problem with the film is that, other than the main plot of bad ass woman, fails on every other level. The idea that the continental U. S. is defended by just two stations that can be taken while no one can get to them in time is stupid, but let's roll with it. The idea that one could sink one of the stations at any time, but chooses to burn through two thick steel doors in order to burn the circuits with acid is even dumber, but OK, the guy has a burning fetish. Having not one, but two different ways in the command center other than the door after literally saying that's the only way in an out is indefensible, but having the villains taking those paths in only randomly and ignoring them otherwise is pathetic. And the piece of resistance: having more villains than there are people who are not on a military platform.

Perhaps the worst part is that it touches on some things: the greed that makes people harm themselves, cultism and sexism and racism in the army, the inherent weakness of regular people who are invested in the lives of others. But then it bungles those things up with a redemption story that validates business as usual and relegates the hero to another thankless job that she is, of course, thankful for. And this film is now number 1 on Netflix, which pretty much explains why the company is dying.
46 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watchable grade-B terrorist combat stuff
gcsman4 June 2022
A B-movie for sure -- the storyline is contrived, the dialog is superficial, and the acting is wooden. So my rating of 5/10 is probably generous. Nevertheless, I thought it was watchable and it fitted the purpose of having something to look at while I was exercising. Lead actress Elsa Patacky is front and center throughout this movie, playing US Army captain JJ Collins, who as soon as she is assigned to the remote marine base SBX-1 has to fight off terrorists who want to nuke 16 cities and destroy America. Somehow there's lots of money involved. Luke Bracey, as the smarmy leader of the enemies, has an easy way of delivering lines even if those lines are laughably conventional. And, Patacky's husband Chris Hemsworth (who's the executive producer -- what a coincidence) has a little cameo role that's completely meaningless but still pretty fun.

Almost right off the bat, Patacky gets down to action gear where we can enjoy looking at her very well muscled shoulders and arms (and that's kind of the main interest of the movie -- they really are nice to look at). There's lots of hand-to-hand combat and a fairly high body count, with the hero(ine) taking and dishing out lots of punishment and displaying superhuman stamina, but I'd be hard pressed to think of any original twist on anything that happened here. The idea that the US missile defence system depends on a single little remote ocean base that seems about as hard to knock over as a candy store is pretty implausible.

It feels like a B-grade version of Die Hard.
47 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is actually a great comedy, unfortunately the cast don't know that.
Pigeon_down10 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It's good to know that nepotism is alive and well in Hollyweird. Well, if you hadn't spotted that the Gyllenhaals and Nick Cage etc, you can certainly see it here with Chris Hemsworth's wife getting the leading role in this stunning clown script of a production. Some treasures to watch out for:

1. The terrorists get onto one of the highest security US bases as cleaners?

2. The terrorists decide to try to cut through a muiti-inch thick steel blast door using a blow torch, to access the control room, despite the blast door having a plastic window in it that would simply melt.

3. The near impenitrable control room happens to have a wide hatch in the door that can simply be popped open, and worse, a ladder leader up to two doos that are about as heavy as those on the top of a typical household washing machine, with NO LOCKS that simply open on to the helicopter landing deck!

4. Mrs Hemworth, having been shot through the arm, decides she can swing across the monkey bars that oddly seem to exist on the under side of the oil rig style platform, and she manages to perform this amazing and impossible feat, not only swinging from one bar to the next with just one arm, but also making it across a large 6ft gap - I'm pretty sure there isn't a gymnast alive that could do this.

5. It turns out that the US's most advanced missile defence system can simply be connected to a local personal laptop and all of the code downloaded to it so you can then launch the entire missile defence system from it. Yep, no real security protocols, you just plug and play and fire missiles into space.

6. The terrorist leader loves monologues.

7. Motivation, now label me excessively critical, but if you land 15 nukes on the US and wipe out major US cities, then the value of the US dollar will drop through the floor. SO why are the terrorists boasting about getting paid in dollars if they pull the heist off? The idiocy level here is huge.

8. The baddies want to transmit all of their evil doing around the world onto every TV screen possible letting everyone watch as they launch nukes to destroy the US, at no point are they concerned that they might become wanted by any other part of NATO.

9. Mrs Hermsworths grand plan to thwart the terrorists is to let them get in and take over the control room then take them out. The Nerd Game modelling mathematician assisting the president gives this just a 14% chance of success - really? He did that in his head? A plan that makes no sense at all. But, tied up and unarmed Mrs Hemsworth basically beats up and shoots everybody dead.

In sum, if a movie this bad had been proposed in the 1980s even Steven Seagal and Van Dam would have turned it down as a joke. This movie is so silly it makes TEAM America World Police look like a documentary.

There are simply no redeeming elements to this movie. The script is so bad It takes a dump in your brain. The acting looks like they simply filmed the first script read through rehearsal.

After this, I just don't think there is any future for Mrs Hemsworth on either the big or small screen. Interceptors is pretty much the Armageddon of her career.

My advice, watch this movie when you are high or drunk and just imagine it's a Monty Python film, you'll enjoy it more that way.
190 out of 234 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Almost unwatchable
DeadMansTrousers5 June 2022
This is one of those rare moments when you should trust the negative reviews. Elsa Pataky was fine in the small roles she had in the Fast and Furious films but she is not an action star and her acting can not support a film on its own. Apart from that the cgi in this is TERRIBLE, it looks like you are watching a direct to video film from the 80s. The writing is awful, the one liners in this are so generic and completely uninspired. The action in this is also very bland and the fight scenes are too repetitive. Nothing about this movie is fresh or entertaining, I'm not sure who the target audience is supposed to be but this is one movie that you should avoid.
407 out of 526 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The latest masterpiece that Netflix gifted us with
If you:

  • like high-intensity plots that are incredibly well-researched
  • have waited for ages to finally see a believable and well-written female action lead
  • love great, witty dialogue and its flawless delivery
  • are a fan of sublety and great taste in pacing
  • have a faible for a sublime, but powerful score
  • long for incredibly emotional and competent acting
  • have an eye for masterful direction
  • hope for Netflix to greenlight content based on quality for a change
  • despise nepotism
  • are hyped by gritty, well-choreographed and skillfully performed, captured and edited action


you should skip this and save yourself the embarrassment.
286 out of 368 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Generic action for exactly that mood
sarcasm8328 June 2022
I can understand why some people don't like the movie, as it was a cheesy and generic flick for sure, but not sure if I can understand the many upset 1/10 reviews from people who seem to have taken this personally somehow. All those reviews read exactly like metacritic review bombs where people are upset over something else than the content they're reviewing... or just rants from people who love exaggerating for drama.

This reminded me of some straight to VHS average action flicks that you'd pick up from the rental place completely deliberately for that day where you just want a mindless movie and as such, it worked very well. Did I laugh and roll my eyes at convenient plotpoint? Sure. But I also expected to.

I kinda liked seeing a female lead for once. Just like male leads powers are always played way up and how John McLane can still run and kick ass after being battered and bruised beyond any reason, just flying away from explosions instead of exploDING, so did she. If your suspension of disbelief fails only on the part of her being a woman, I guess you truely have it ingrained in you that "women = weak" and can't even for a moment tune that out in a silly action flick.

This kinda reminded me of some "Tomb Raider" kind of deal, with the exception that I actually enjoyed this more than any Tomb Raider movie.

If you are "tired of feeling like my identity is always attacked by films such as this.", that is just sad. There have been crazy egomaniac villains that have agendas like this in movies for a small eternity and obviously the movie's not saying he's right.

If you are very keen on only seeing agendas in women being shown as anything capable, do yourself a favor and skip it. If you're looking for a generic action flick for a mindless day? Sure, why not :)
67 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hot steaming Turd
brett-762607 June 2022
Yeah this movie was a hot mess from the first to last minute. As a United States Marine this was utter nonsense and from a technical perspective, it was embarrassing. It was so bad Thor was brought on as a producer to try and save the day. They wanted his name added to give it some kind of credibility. Yeah not happening. You can put lipstick on a pig but at the end of the day, it's still a pig. Don't waste your time on this one folks cause it really is a hot turd... Ug soooo bad..
167 out of 243 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Oh come on... it was fun.
mark-fenwick296 June 2022
I've missed the stupid action hero's of the 80s & 90. It disengage my brain for 1hr 30 mins and that what I need at the moment.

Acting was dreadful but it fit the genre and reminded me of the straight to video movies you took a punt on for a Friday night.
103 out of 157 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wtf is this?
jason_angelswings3 June 2022
This is like a badly written story that's had a satire made about it and then a movie made about the satire but unironically.

Every line is cheese and a joke but acted "seriously"

The movie is so substandard that anyone involved should be ashamed. Especially Chris Hemsworth.
224 out of 335 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What's all the negativity about
cheddar-324-878086 June 2022
I don't agree with most of the critics here, I thought the movie was quite entertaining from a typical action plot scenerio (aka terrorist threat, nuclear missile threat, white house under threat, whole world under threat etc.)! The notable difference here is that the "hero" is female! Really? How many blockbuster franchises thrived with the exact same ridiculous plot lines, the Die hard franchise comes to mind, as does the Indiana jones, James bond, etc. Must I go on? Yes, the plot was just as ridiculous as the aforementioned are but I enjoyed it just as much as the aforementioned! The only thing they screwed up on was that the main character was Spanish with a notable accent (i'm not casting aspersions, just saying, and then realizing she's the wife of Chris Hemsworth who's hilarious as the TV sales person, but it really makes no sense, unless you put into the plot that she was adopted as a ten year old or something, as her dad clearly had no accent whatsoever! The other critizism I have is why did the "Marine helicopters" never arrive? I mean really? They were promised constantly, oh, they're 90 minutes out (in the beginning, not enough time, then they were supposedly 10 minutes out toward the end and they just never materialized! After researching, I realize the production was on a very limited budget and giving it slack for that, I really enjoyed this movie, give it a go!
67 out of 103 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This is top of the line B action
mcal19735 June 2022
Look. This is a thoroughly enjoyable action yarn. I did not go into this expecting much, but, I came out satisfied. It's everything you could want in a cheesy low budget film.
38 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Netflix in a shell.
artur-niedzielski3 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Poor acting. #metoo stereotypes. Not credible. The the story is so incredible. If I had to pay for a movie ticket to see it, I'd be a little pissed off afterwards.
268 out of 406 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
hahahahah :D
leonidasoriginal4 June 2022
This is bad on so many levels, you can start from anywhere and you will start with something bad. So I was looking for a way to start from the good side. So here it goes: "The beautiful ocean... and then HAHAHAH :) OMG! "
179 out of 275 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wow, this is really really bad
stevedgrossman4 June 2022
Save yourselves, and pass on this complete piece of trash.

The acting is so so bad, the plot, script, all of it is just so so terrible.

Netflix, for this I paid an increase?

So close to cancelling my subscription.
160 out of 247 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste, waste, waste
gpxdlr4 June 2022
Do not see this. If you've ever been in the military, whether as a grunt or an officer, you will see the numerous errors made by this writer/director. He tried to make a decent film but he failed, big time.
163 out of 261 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Coming from a first time filmmaker, it's actually not bad.
Top_Dawg_Critic13 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
As writer and director, this is Matthew Reilly's first ever dabble into filmmaking. I have to admit, his directing was spot on, and the premise of his story pretty original - with some nice twists, but of course there were cliches, and some plot and technical issues. But he's allowed rookie mistakes as a newb.

The pacing was decent for the comfortable 99 min runtime. The cinematography was great, and the sets and location very unique and interesting. Even the score, for a B film, surprisingly wasn't overbearing and unfitting.

Considering Reilly has no experience in directing his cast, they all performed pretty decent, although I have to say, casting Elsa Pataky was a huge mistake. She did not fit the role whatsoever, and her accent (compared even to her dads non-existent accent) became very annoying and made her tough-soldier act unconvincing. How would she even be so high up in the ranks barely speaking proper English? I mean any other actress would've been more believable, as long as their broken English wasn't as bad as hers. It was so bad, I though the twist would be that she's one of the undercover RU's. That aside, even her tough-gal act was unbelievably cheesy, especially taking on guys three times her weight. Poorest casting choice I've seen in a while. It was awesome though seeing Chris Hemsworth as the TV salesman.

Considering this is Reilly's first ever filmmaking credit, I'd say he did better than some film I've seen lately from seasoned filmmakers. So to the wanna be critics who only know the number one out of ten, learn how to review properly. The production value alone makes this easily at least a 5/10, but it's a well deserving 7/10 from me, and could've easily been more with a better lead and some tweaks in the screenplay. Nevertheless, I applaud Mr. Reilly for his first film.
33 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Made me want to cancel my Netflix account
pleeson-836583 June 2022
A truely terrible movie Acting and the score are high school level .

Most movies I can understand getting some good reviews even I don't enjoy , I can't fathom how people are rating this movie a 10.
119 out of 192 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good old fashioned action movie...
paul_haakonsen4 June 2022
Granted, from this 2022 action movie's cover/poster, then I was expecting that I would be in for a low budget action movie, very much in the spirit of the movies you get from The Asylum. But I figured, since this was actually on Netflix, that I might chance it and watch what writers Matthew Reilly and Stuart Beattie had to offer with "Interceptor".

And now that I have seen "Interceptor", I will say that this movie was actually surprisingly good. This felt and looked like a good old 1980s and 1990s action movie, you know the ones that had the likes of Schwarzenegger, Stallone, Van Damme, and so forth on the cast list. So if you enjoyed the action movies of the 1980s and 1990s, then you most certainly will also enjoy "Interceptor".

The storyline told in "Interceptor", as written by Matthew Reilly and Stuart Beattie, is pretty straight forward, if not actually generic in concept and idea, but it hardly matters because "Interceptor" was an enjoyable and entertaining movie. It had all the elements that you needed in an action movie such as this. And that means that the fact of you knowing how the movie will end hardly mattered, as the ride from the beginning to the end was enjoyable.

Now, I wasn't familiar with the cast ensemble that were a part of "Interceptor", but they had gotten together a good collection of talents for the movie. The leading performers, Elsa Pataky and Luke Bracey, were nicely cast for the movie. Well, the part about being all unfamiliar cast members was a bit of an overstatement, as the movie actually had Chris Hemsworth on an uncredited role.

I have to say that I was genuinely entertained by "Interceptor", and it is certainly a movie that is well-worth taking the time to sit down and watch. Sure, the movie doesn't have enough contents to be an action movie classic, nor does it have enough contents to support more than a single viewing, but trust me when I say it is worth watching.

"Interceptor" is a movie that is crammed with enough one liners and clichés to put on a smile on the lips of the 1980s and 1990s action movies for sure.

My rating of director Matthew Reilly's "Interceptor" lands on a six out of ten stars.
67 out of 126 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Cliches and tropes aplenty
feyipuk29 July 2022
The opening blurb tells us America has two bases designated to stop inbound nuclear missiles from Russia. One is a military base in Alaska, no doubt guarded by plenty of heavily armed soldiers, plenty of security counter measures to stop people getting in and teams of backup in case of any problems. The other is a precarious floating rig, with a handful of missile batteries, that doesn't appear to have any defences or counter measures, and the nearest support is an hour away. From that set up, the bad guys we see in the film have really over complicated their plans. All they want to do is disable the interceptor rocket batteries, yet are stoic in following through their own plan, which is guarded by Captain J. J. Collins (Elsa Pataky), who is equally single minded in her objective, in the standard lone action hero way.

More bizarrely to all that, we have Chris Hemsworth providing comic interludes. Did the mildly simmering tension really need that?

Not really. The scenario is a claustrophobic set, resulting in intense and brutal fights, with basically the one goal that's in the title. Forget any notion of checking to see if the rest of the ships crew are alive (we told you we used nerve gas and shot them all, but maybe we didn't...), she has one mission and will carry it out. Tim Wong (who's also the films fight coordinator) as Zhang and Ingrid Kleinig (who's also the films second unit director) as Kira are most known for their stunt work, so it's no surprise that they are involved in some of the more physical acts. Steven A. Davis as Nikolai is also the films assistant fight coordinator, though he's not that active in fighting. Emotional support comes from Mayen Mehta as Corporal Rahul Shah playing the introverted subordinate soldier - a turtle owning family man - while Rhys Muldoon as Lieutenant Colonel Clark Marshall fills in the emotional back story about how the Captain has suffered in her career, with Belinda Jombwe as Ensign Washington giving a brief motivational speech . That seems to be the take away from the film; all the main characters feel/should feel wronged by the system, and it's how they deal with those feelings that separates which side their on.

The set is very minimal and the CGI reminiscent of 80's VHS stuff - it gets the story where it needs to go - while the soundtrack accents the vision; you can watch with subtitles and know something is going to happen by the "tense instrumental music".

IMDB also have Ali Kadhim as Dark Cloud (Japanese Sword Guy), yet he's not included in the films credits (and I don't remember him in the film). Maybe the producers thought that was one cliche too far?
24 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An 80s Action Movie in 2020s Clothing
imdb-2114 June 2022
Growing up as a kid in the 80s and early 90s, I watched a lot of terrible movies. Movies like American Warrior, On Deadly Ground, or The Delta Force. Were these movies great? Of course not. But did I love them anyway, because they were hokey and fun? You bet I did!

If, like me, you miss these kinds of movies, movies that don't take themselves too seriously, movies that turn an incredibly implausible premise into 90 minutes of mindless entertainment, movies in which the bad guy is actually bad, and the good guy is a gruff action hero with a gun or two, movies where most actors have more muscles than acting skills, movies with poorly choreographed knife fights that, somehow, still end up making you invested in what is happening on screen, this is for you.

If that doesn't describe you, you should probably look elsewhere. Me, though? I absolutely loved watching this. I'm happy this movie exists, and I hope we'll see more like it in the future. And I hope that we'll see Elsa Pataky in more of them, because she makes for a fantastic action movie lead.
38 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A True Matthew Reilly Film
jaymeelinellis3 June 2022
From the first minute you can tell it's a Matthew Reilly film.

Is it his directorial debut? Yes.

But having read every single book he has ever written, he brings the same fast-paced, over the top action to this film and its script.

Something that critics won't understand, having (I'm assuming) not read his novels, is this is how a Matthew Reilly story normally goes (particularly the Scarecrow novels).

1. Badass character/s 2. Usually stuck somewhere 3. Fight their way through a bunch of bad guys, destroying stuff along the way 4. Lots of side characters die 5. Save the day

Now, film critics may not like this. But as a lover of his books (the only novels of this genre I actually enjoy), this movie was 100% bringing his storytelling style to life on screen.

Will everyone like it? Probably not.

But damn if it wasn't a fun time.

Yes, the character exposition isn't great. But... it's a Matthew Reilly story. It's never been about the strength of the characters in his Scarecrow books (Jack West is a different vein but still very focused on action over character exposition).

Yes, they're trapped in a single space. It adds to the craziness of how the characters overcome problems.

Yes, the dialogue isn't awesome. Have you READ a Matthew Reilly book? It's not Shakespeare. It's amazing, crazy fun with some badass characters thrown in.

Sometimes people just need to enjoy things for what they are.

Well done on a good first foray onto the screen. And for all who didn't like it - sorry. But this is 100% Matthew Reilly, and I am HERE for it.

Scarecrow next!
45 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Woeful & wasteful of your time
merril4449 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
What a load of rubbish! This movie sucked. The storyline was ridiculous & then suspend your belief that a tiny woman can deck all these huge men, swing one handed on monkey bars & have a gutteral European accent but is supposedly good old American GI Jane. Please!

Not to mention a poorly disguised Chris Hemsworth as a hippy TV salesman. Was that supposed to be tongue in cheek?

Then there's the Russian command giving subordinates the option about who to kill? As if!

Terrible acting, predictable storyline, terrible CGI, predictable outcome. Not worth your time.
63 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This was so painful
caseypthompson3 June 2022
I could only do 25:40 minutes to when the dude popped out the hatch like a cliche magical ninja. The acting, the musical score, the cinematography, the script...it's so so bad.

I never waste my time posting bad 1 star reviews but this just was so horrible I had to say something. The score and action itself sounded/looked like it was a child action tv show. Go go power rangers!

This isn't even Sharknado bad, because at least it was meant to be bad.

And maybe it was meant to be a bit satirical because it was so awful? But they still didn't make it work.

It's just plain awful.

Netflix has gotten so bad. They are only still thriving because of Stranger Things.
118 out of 197 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
To watch only for punishment
albertoagd3 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It is hard to imagine that conversation when the producers decided to move on with this script ans cast.

Maybe someone lost a bet, I do not know...

What I know is that things as stupid as try to breach in through a 100mm steel door cutting the metal... when the door has a huge a glass window; or deciding to "use acid" to crash the controls of the missiles instead of blowing them up...

I could go on, but I strongly believe this was a test for a comedy movie that went wrong, so it does not make sense.

The worst part (and it is really difficut to select one among so many other good options) is the completely dumb and simplicist sexual harassment motto to support the main role.

Simply ABSURD MOVIE. Cannot wait to read more critics.
103 out of 176 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed