"Masters of the Air" Part Three (TV Episode 2024) Poster

(TV Mini Series)

(2024)

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
The build up is over, into hell we go
vandykeu2 February 2024
Episode 3 of Masters of the Air focuses on the Regensburg mission, in August 1943. Of the episodes so far, it holds clearest to the history. Some of this is because it focuses only on that one mission. And it is a brutal one.

Regensburg was one of those successful failures. The episode introduces the plan: 3 task forces of bombers are going to simultaneously hit multiple targets in Germany, with the 100th then flying through Europe and the med on to Africa. Only one problem: weather screws up the rendesvous. And, they are ordered to fly anyway, forget the mission aim.

So, instead of 3 task forces all at once, the 100th's is on its own. And we see/feel the consequences.

No spoilers here, but it is worth reflecting on something. As bad as what we are shown is (and was), the other task forces fared even worse. The other target, Schweinfurt, was heavily defended by the time the 2nd and 3rd task forces arrived. In total, the 8th Air Force lost 60 B-17s that day. That's 600 men killed or captured in a single mission. Perhaps the only downside of this episode is that this fact was not stated.
29 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Soaring High, Landing Uneven
SonGoku5403 February 2024
Mission Briefing: Episode 3, titled "Part Three," takes us deep into the heart of the war with the Bloody Hundredth on a daring mission: bombing German factories and escaping to Africa. Buckle up, it's a bumpy ride.

The aerial dogfights are masterfully crafted, visceral and intense, putting you right in the cockpit with the B-17s. The episode doesn't shy away from the human cost of war, showcasing the fear, camaraderie, and sacrifice of the airmen. The limited time window for the mission adds a constant layer of tension. The CGI and production design are top-notch, recreating the period and the vastness of the sky with stunning realism. Butler delivers a nuanced performance as Major Gale Cleven, showcasing both his leadership and vulnerability.

As mentioned, Butler is a standout, capturing the complexities of his character. While individually talented, the actors are often limited by the masks and script, making it harder to connect with them emotionally.

Stunning aerial cinematography and CGI bring the B-17s and dogfights to life. Sound Design is immersive and impactful, amplifying the tension and chaos of the battles. Score's emotionally charged music elevates key moments and adds depth to the narrative.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Makes up for the debacle of first 2 episodes.
zwctmwdg2 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I couldn't have been more dissatisfied with first 2 episodes. The lack of character development, lack of tension, rushed battle sequences and flat dialogue disappointed me. And I was someone who eagerly anticipated the premiere of this series.

Oh my does that change in episode 3. The tension Is at an all time high with a prolonged battle sequence and due to riding it out with the characters in this sequence, you develop a care for them which will be vital in future episodes.

I'm not sure what they were thinking in first 2 episodes but I'm so happy they got it right in this one! I am happy to be invested in the series again!
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Outstanding history in the episode
kenstallings-653463 February 2024
This series is sweating the details and getting them right. Want to know how real it is portrayed? Ask pilots and they will tell you. It's real enough to be visceral. You feel the situation as it's played out.

The entire episode is devoted to the most historic mission the 100th Bomb Group flew during the war, as they launched from England, flew over all of Germany, and then continued on to North Africa.

The only way the mission was deemed to have any chance of success was if it was part of three air wings coordinated to carry out three attacks simultaneously. As so often happened in the ETO air war, events conspired to ruin the plan.

This is the mission that earned the 100th their name, "The Bloody 100th." Their part of the mission is the only one that flew as planned, and they bore the brunt of the German response in a most brutal manner.

What is being done here is history played out on screen for all of us to see. Moreover, since it is more than a documentary, it opens up a look into the psyches of the men who flew it.

Exact dialog in the episode is verbatim of what the actual aviators in the war said, and how they said it. It's raw and unnerving, and this series deserves high marks for turning outstanding production values into far more than a simple mini-series.

What is being done is for the first time, our modern era is being taken back to a time where even the men who participated are challenged to try to put into words the scope of what took place, even as their inner selves would like to bury it deep so they don't have to think about it.

It takes all aspects to combine to reach the true sense of what these men experienced. This series is achieving that combination, and we would do well to carefully consider its stark reality.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
ACTION!!!
michaeldp-890382 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The first two episodes contain some action, but this is the first real episode where we see a full battle scene. As I continue to get to know the characters better, my appreciation for the show grows. The action within the bombers is fantastic and I love the way the production team is able to frame conversations within the plane and they can really capture the chaos going on. Further, the added tension in this episode regarding the fact that the bomber group is basically all alone is incredible writing. The whole story of the episode keeps you in constant action, yet you feel like you can understand what is going on anyways. This episode really put you in the shoes of the men in the plane and I felt like I was right along with them as the battle was going on.

Truly a great episode and I can't wait for the next one!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Feel Obligated to Be Kind
A-Olty2 February 2024
This episode beautifully portrays a story of resilience in the face of cruel adversity and unfavourable odds. It also mostly allays my early CGI concerns. But.

There's a rushed feeling to the combat as enemy aircraft move too quickly, turrets turn too fast. Is this pedantic criticism? Maybe. The results however, are real. The combat feels rushed. It undermines the tension. Everything needs slowing down, to soak in the terror of life in the balance. This is true of the entire show where little has happened to push character development, leaving us to care for these men only on the premise that they're Americans and they look cool. Am I invested in a few of the characters, probably yes, but the rest? No.

To date, the treatment of the British RAF has also been abysmal in the first episodes. As a nation and an Air Force, they had been playing this game for years when the USAAF arrived in Europe. Beyond the frankly stupid pub/fight scene of the previous episode, this one claiming that the raid portrayed (August 17th '43) was the largest air armada ever assembled is just untrue. They talk of 600-odd aircraft with 376 bombers taking part. The month before the RAF hit Hamburg with 800 bombers in a single night, 27/28 July '43. It was a combined effort and the British had learnt hard lessons, treat that with respect. It's not an opportunity to score points with your American audience.

The feeling so far is that this show had a lot of promise. Two additional episodes introducing the wider cast of characters would have added the much needed emotional attachment and investment. What we got instead was an often beautiful and sometimes jarring CGI vision of men without backstory moving through a bygone time. Good looking men, in cool jackets, isn't enough.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
How can they make this mistake?
randalneirynck4 February 2024
Once more, a recurring error surfaces regarding Belgium. It's crucial to note that in Flanders, Dutch, not French, is the primary language. The perplexity arises from the meticulous research invested in ensuring historical accuracy concerning planes and missions, yet a fundamental linguistic aspect is overlooked. The discrepancy is evident, and it raises questions about the attention to detail in portraying the region accurately.

The frustration is amplified by the persistent misconception among Americans that Belgians predominantly speak French. Despite the extensive research on historical context, this linguistic misrepresentation stands out, underscoring the need for more accurate depictions.

Looking ahead, there's a hopeful anticipation that subsequent episodes will rectify such errors. As a viewer, one desires a seamless and authentic portrayal of the region, free from linguistic inaccuracies. Episode 4 becomes a pivotal juncture in assessing whether the series can maintain historical fidelity and cultural precision.
14 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Third Time's the Charm - Episode 3 - "Part Three"
xNanoks5 May 2024
No spoilers.

From okay-ish, to stunning. From bland characters, to in-depth treasures. From tedious speed, to exhilarating momentum. Third time's the charm indeed. It took us two episodes, which, in anything but a mini series would be fine, to get to the episode that shows us Masters of the Air's true potential. The episode has nearly everything the show missed thus far. By the end, we've been on a journey, witnessed the cost of war, and see where our aerial troops stand amidst conflict.

While no guarantee can be given for the momentum to be held at this very point in the show, episode 3 sets the stage anew. If you look past the grim nature of mission briefing telling nothing of the severity of the challenge ahead, facial expressions and hard-heard sighs make up for its absence. The action in particular, is stunning. Nearly capturing the feeling of being on such a plane yourself, Cary (director for the first two episodes as well) takes you deep into the battle. The mission is an immensely important one, one that has been told many times but never has been captured this beautifully.

Add to the above that we can finally begin to see the splintering of arcs and storylines, the episode is easily the best so far. With it setting the tone for the episodes to come, hopefully, one can't help but wonder how their favorite characters will fare further down the line.

9 out of 10 knots. Stunning TV.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
U.S. Air Corps doctrine put to the test
jread-526 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
American bombing doctrine was that daylight precision strategic bombing was more effective than the British doctrine of night time area bombing. Americans thought that the heavily-armed and Norden bombsight-equipped B-17s could fight off enemy fighters and hit clearly-defined targets, and that by destroying key industries (fighter aircraft production, oil refining, ball bearing production) enemy war making would be stymied. It turned out that the theory was almost right. Albert Speer, minister of German production, said after the war that if the ball bearing campaign had been maintained, production of heavy machinery would have been greatly suppressed. The Wehrmacht was hindered throughout the war by lack of fuel.

However, in practice, deep penetration of enemy territory without fighter escort was, as the British said in the episode, "Suicide." The Eighth did not try it again until P-51s were available.

This episode of Masters of the Air was very accurate, both as to why and how Schweinfurt-Regenburg went wrong and to why it was tried in the first place. It could be shown in history classes as a vivid lesson.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Part Three"
allmoviesfan2 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
A brutal and confronting episode as Masters of the Air really hits it's straps. It is August 1943 and the Bloody Hundredth are tasked their most difficult and demanding mission yet, sent on a bombing run deep into German territory. History will record it as the Regensburg-Schweinfurt mission. For the men who flew in it, "disaster" might be a better way to describe what happened there.

The cinematography has been brilliant throughout, but it really shines through in "Part Three", which is a difficult watch at times because of what you're witnessing the crews go through on a mission that eventually takes them to Africa.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
PART 3
moviesfilmsreviewsinc27 April 2024
In the two-episode premiere of Masters of the Air, it is difficult to predict if Cleven, Egan, and Biddick will survive the entire war due to the lack of detailed knowledge about each man's history. However, the episode "Part Three" provides a good reason to ponder the lack of knowledge. Despite Cleven and Egan's uncertainty about Curt Biddick's whereabouts, the audience is certain. In the opening episodes, Biddick manages to avoid a deadly crash-landing and ends up with friendly people on the coast of Scotland. In the episode, the 100th Bomb Group, led by Lt. Roy Frank Claytor, successfully bails out of a plane that is going down fast. However, Biddick's attempt to steer his downed plane and save his co-pilot's life is thwarted by a highly placed tree cover, and the plane blows up midway through the episode. Barry Keoghan is bid adieu to the immensely talented actor, who is off to deal with his burgeoning film career. Chapter 3 involves a dangerous "three-punch combo" mission to Africa, aiming to bomb Regensburg for the longest time over German territory and deepest into Germany. Major Bowman announces the plan, which involves three task forces flying together and then splitting, allowing only one squadron to defend. The first squadron will refuel, while the second squadron will drop bombs on Schweinfurt. Instead of turning back, they will fly to Africa in Telergma, aiming to confuse the Germans while the Americans bomb sites with precision. Major Egan (Callum Turner) volunteers to fly in Captain Cruikshank's fort as a reserved commander pilot, despite being in the back seat. The 100th is "tail-end Charlie," meaning their squadron is at the end of the most dangerous place. Major Kidd leads the 418th, Major Veal leads the 349th, and the 351st squadrons are in the high position. Colonel Neil 'Chick' Harding orders the 100th to fly alone without cover or air support, causing chaos. Extra fighters stop the Germans from coming back for a second offensive. Quinn is held at gunpoint by resistance fighters in Germany-occupied Belgium. After jumping out of the plane, he lands safely and meets a girl who identifies as an American. She finds her father, who alerts her to the resistance. They explain that he can either turn himself in to the Germans, be placed in a prisoner camp, and survive the war, or escape back to England. If caught, he will be executed as a spy.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good But With A Glaring Omission
irishrebel982 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This episode about the August 17, 1943, Schweinfurt-Regensburg mission does an excellent job of portraying the horrors of WWII air-to-air combat and of how brave the 8th Air Force crews had to be to fly their missions, while also portraying them as very human with real fears. Ordinarily, I would rate an episode like this an 8 or a 9, but I'm giving it a 7 because of a glaring omission from the story. That is that these long-range missions deep into Germany were so dangerous to fly because the Allied fighter planes of that period of the war in Europe (American P-47 Thunderbolt and P-38 Lightning - British Spitfire) did not have the range to escort the B-17s all the way to the target and back (there actually has been no mention of Allied fighter escorts in the series yet at all). This meant that on these missions the Germans would wait until the fighters escorting the B-17s turned back and then they would attack. The theory was that the B-17s in their formations, where the guns of each plane would support those of the others, would be able to battle through the German fighters without serious losses. Well, when battle theory doesn't work in battle practice, people get killed, and that is what happened here, where the 8th Air Force lost 60 bombers that day, including 9 from the 100th. It would have taken maybe two minutes to clarify this in the episode and would have made for even higher drama. Losses like this are going to continue, but there was a significant development at the end of 1943 that changed things for the better, but I won't disclose this for now.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Episode 103, still no Band of Brothers
nscoby935 February 2024
Masters of the Air continue to underwhelm. While the visuals and cinematography at times can be good, the characters, their development, and the writing is less than great.

This episode is all about the mission, which is great because it leaves no time for dull dialogue and cliche moments like the first two episodes had. But now that we get an entire episode devoted to aerial combat, I still don't feel completely satisfied.

The reason is that the show is failing to pack an emotional punch. I mean, how could it be when you don't care too much for the characters. Then, on top of that, the combat sequences aren't hitting me as hard as other war films have or how the sequences in Band of Brothers did.

The creators of this show need to understand the level of quality that is expected and they are not reaching it. Band of Brothers is one of the great World War II TV dramas of all time. Admittedly, it's a high bar to reach, but with Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks both producing, I expect nothing less.

Here's hoping the show will improve as the season goes on, but after three episodes, I'm beginning to think this is all the show will offer.

IMDb: 6/10 Letterboxd: 3/5

Watched on Apple TV+ in 4k Dolby Vision.
6 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Underwhelming
clapham-367782 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Why did they not postpone until the next day if it was so important they all took off together as in the briefing, D-Day was postponed at the last minute due to bad weather?

Where was the fighter cover?

Why was there no one to meet them in Algeria, medic's etc?

It's amazing even in American productions the US armed forces are depicted as shambolic.

A World War II series centered around American bomber crews, fails to soar to the heights of its genre counterparts, leaving viewers grounded in a landscape of mediocrity. The show, which promised an intense exploration of the challenges faced by bomber crews during the war, ultimately falls short in both storytelling and character development.

One of the major drawbacks of the series is its inability to capture the emotional depth and historical accuracy required for a World War II narrative. The characters, despite being part of a harrowing war experience, lack the necessary depth to engage viewers on a profound level. The writing struggles to convey the raw emotions and struggles faced by the crew members, reducing them to mere caricatures rather than fully fleshed-out individuals.

Furthermore, the series fails to provide an authentic portrayal of the historical context. Inaccuracies in uniforms, equipment, and dialogue distract from the immersive experience one would expect from a WWII production. Viewers familiar with the era may find it challenging to suspend disbelief, as the series overlooks crucial details that could have enriched the narrative and provided a more authentic feel.

The pacing of "Masters of the Air" is another stumbling block. Episodes meander without a clear sense of direction, leaving the audience disoriented and disconnected from the overarching story. The lack of a cohesive narrative thread makes it difficult to invest in the characters' fates or understand the broader implications of their missions.

The cinematography, while attempting to capture the intensity of aerial combat, falls short of delivering the visceral impact one would expect. The special effects often feel dated, undermining the gravity of the situations faced by the bomber crew. Poorly choreographed action sequences and unconvincing CGI contribute to a sense of detachment rather than immersion.

Perhaps the most significant flaw lies in the series' missed opportunity to explore the psychological toll on the crew members. War is a complex experience that goes beyond the battlefield, yet "Flight into Darkness" fails to delve into the psychological aspects of being a part of a bomber crew. The result is a shallow depiction of the characters' internal struggles, missing a chance to add depth and nuance to the narrative.

In conclusion, "Masters of the Air" struggles to rise above the multitude of World War II series that have set the bar high for historical dramas. Lacking emotional resonance, historical accuracy, and a compelling narrative arc, the series ultimately fails to do justice to the untold stories of American bomber crews during a pivotal period in history.
7 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So far my least favorite
KRhea334 February 2024
I truly enjoyed part one and two for all the ups and downs. I was instantly captivated by this show. The character development especially, but at part three was disappointing. For action fans, they will love it, but that isn't why I am watching this very compelling show. I am here for the history and to better understand in some small way what our boys (Americans) went through and it's frustrating to read reviews that focus solely on action scenes as if that's the most important factor. This particular episode was not one of my favorites and not because of the lives lost, but because of the focus on action alone. I realize this might not be how others feel, but it's my opinion.

One reviewer actually said, "finally, this episode was good" which I respectfully disagree with because I feel there is a need to balance drama and emotion with action. Once action takes over, if you don't have the character development, then you won't have the desired impact. I am the reverse of that user indicating episode 3 the best when I feel it was the weakest so far:
1 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A bit disappointed with the inaccuracy.
genoudj-4883118 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
You would believe that they would know that The Hague Convention was after WWI and the Geneva Convention was after WWII. Which neither the Germans were a part of so they would not have followed the Geneva Convention even if it existed. A very big mistake for anyone who knows basic history. We watching were distracted by this grave error.

As to not give too much away the rest of the episode was pretty solid. It did have some saddening scenes when planes do go down even with the understanding it would happen after the crews get the order to continue mission.

Next time doing a historical movie though there needs to be better research to not cause a loss of focus due to a huge mistake.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed