"NCIS" Cover Story (TV Episode 2007) Poster

(TV Series)

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Technical error - unlikely scenario
cggage10 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Good episode, but . . .

I believe there is a technical error in the story where text was being read off the typewriter ribbon. This scenario would work if the typewriter used was a Selectric or other modern typewriter using a carbon film cartridge. The more modern typewriter ribbon is used once and discarded. What was typed on paper could have been read off the used film ribbon on the take-up reel of the cartridge. This is why at sensitive business and military installations, these cartridges were destroyed/burned as a matter of standard practice.

However, in this episode McGee used an old portable manual typewriter that used a cloth ribbon. In normal use, no one would use a cloth ribbon once and toss it. Once the ribbon hits the end of the reel, it automatically reverses and is reused again. After a key is struck, the ink in the ribbon bleeds back over the letter just typed, thus re-inking the ribbon, making it ready for its next use. Changing a cloth ribbon was not very common. Offices with heavy daily typing might have replaced a ribbon once per month or more. With this back and forth motion and overstriking of the ribbon it would have been close to impossible to pull text off a cloth ribbon.

I have never seen a carbon film cartridge for a manual typewriter. Those were introduced, I recall, with the IBM Selectric, one of which I still own and use on occasion.

Don't get me wrong, this was a very good NCIS episode, flawed only by this technical error.

Love the show, though! Chuck
14 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A favorite episode
lor_1 September 2011
NCIS became one of TV's all-time hit series due to cast chemistry and excellent writing. Both attributes are on view in "Cover Story", one of my all-time favorite episodes.

On IMDb only a single review is posted, spending its entire length foolishly complaining about a technical error. This is a symptom of our trivia-obsessed current culture, where a clown who finds continuity errors and goofs in major films has a huge website following, but in which young buffs no longer look up to an incisive role model like Pauline Kael or Andrew Sarris the way we boomers did while cultivating our motion picture obsession.

An ingenious script by David North grabs the viewer by the throat early on when McGee discovers that his sense of déja vu at the crime scene stems from the victim so closely resembling one of the fictional characters of his latest novel. He's stymied at Chapter 7 with writer's block, but the other NCIS crew stop mocking him when they discover that they are all potential victims, since Timothy has been using them as the close-to-the-bone models for his invented protagonists.

This element of jeopardy for the team was a clever device to extend the episode beyond its obviously McGee-centric premise. And like many a latter-day episode of "Castle", it permitted the viewer to revel in the comparison of "fictional" vs. "real" (just as fictional, however) characters as the descriptions in the novel-in-progress became clear.

This gimmick was terrifically developed, and the fact that the clue to catching the killer was a goof did not spoil the episode at all. As I watched I fleetingly was aware of the much-used nature of a typewriter ribbon, but my mind glossed over this fact and accepted the twist -such is the want-to-believe nature of a fan. Ordinarily a nitpicker, I wanted to enjoy this episode, and I did.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Pimmy jarma
bevo-1367815 June 2020
I like the bit with the pickup in the drive through coffee shop
3 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Great idea but lacks common sense
CrimeDrama115 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Who was the only person to talk to McGee about being an author and his fictional books the day they responded to a bloody crime scene? The one who referred to him as "Thom," his pen name and talked about his books. McGee acts surprised to see it is him when they arrive where Abby is staying and he has her at gunpoint. McGee should have sat out this case. Sure, he connected his typewriter ribbon to the case but other than that he was worthless to the investigation and that doesn't make sense. He graduated from MIT And John Hopkins University but yet he can't think of the one person who expressed a keen interest in him and his books just before the case begins? Should we really expect that McGee would ever be that clueless? There never should have been a second murder or threat to Abby. It is drawn out to the point it is not believable. McGee is too smart. If Gibbs felt McGee was comprised, he would have ordered him to sit it out. How many cases are like this one, where the team has no clue who the killer is until the final confrontation? Back to McGee's pen name, it is just silly, it must be an inside joke. DiNozzo should have never let McGee live this one down, having no clue who the killer was when he was right there the whole time.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed