A group of adolescent boys and girls are left home with a fourteen year-old named Maria, whose mother is away without explanation. She cooks and rules and they live in a gated community with other spoiled and privileged brats. They break into homes, and, for some reason, no adult is ever present in what looks like the children of the damned. One twenty something woman appears for no apparent reason and is asked by a little girl how to make the Sign of the Cross. Say what! The movie opens with a "presented by Martin Scorcese" credit. I was bored to tears by this film.
4 Reviews
Endearing coming-of-age film in the Gus Van Sant/Larry Clark tradition
larry-4117 July 2009
One of my Top Picks of the 2009 Los Angeles Film Festival was "A Week Alone (Una Semana Solos)," a sweet gem from Argentina.
What's fascinating about attending film festivals is how trends begin to emerge after seeing dozens of films. One recurring theme is the idea of kids being left to their own devices, either by choice or lack of adult supervision, and the inevitable ensuing spiral into mayhem.
Three of my favorite coming-of-age films of the past five years are the 2004 indie classic "Mean Creek," Alexis Dos Santos' "Glue" (also from Argentina), which was my #1 Top Pick from the 2006 Toronto International Film Festival, and "Still Green," the Jon Artigo indie from 2007. "Mean Creek" took a group of kids and set them loose on a boating excursion with dire consequences. "Glue" was an unscripted film featuring three teens in the Argentinian countryside, in a touching story of self-discovery. "Still Green" was set on the Gulf Coast of Florida with a group of college-bound friends, with a dark turn that changes their lives forever.
"A Week Alone" combines elements of all the above, with a slightly bigger budget, a larger group of actors (with a wider age range), and a mostly scripted story (although it felt improvised), set in a posh gated suburban community. When the adults leave for a vacation, an assorted set of sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, nephews, cousins, and friends take over the house (and neighborhood) with, initially, good intentions.
With long takes and tracking shots, viewing the kids as observers with a deliberate, slow pace, "A Week Alone" pays homage to the films of Gus Van Sant and Larry Clark. The awkwardness of adolescence, the pangs of first love, and the playfulness of children without supervision are colorfully captured by writer/director Celina Murga.
What's fascinating about attending film festivals is how trends begin to emerge after seeing dozens of films. One recurring theme is the idea of kids being left to their own devices, either by choice or lack of adult supervision, and the inevitable ensuing spiral into mayhem.
Three of my favorite coming-of-age films of the past five years are the 2004 indie classic "Mean Creek," Alexis Dos Santos' "Glue" (also from Argentina), which was my #1 Top Pick from the 2006 Toronto International Film Festival, and "Still Green," the Jon Artigo indie from 2007. "Mean Creek" took a group of kids and set them loose on a boating excursion with dire consequences. "Glue" was an unscripted film featuring three teens in the Argentinian countryside, in a touching story of self-discovery. "Still Green" was set on the Gulf Coast of Florida with a group of college-bound friends, with a dark turn that changes their lives forever.
"A Week Alone" combines elements of all the above, with a slightly bigger budget, a larger group of actors (with a wider age range), and a mostly scripted story (although it felt improvised), set in a posh gated suburban community. When the adults leave for a vacation, an assorted set of sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, nephews, cousins, and friends take over the house (and neighborhood) with, initially, good intentions.
With long takes and tracking shots, viewing the kids as observers with a deliberate, slow pace, "A Week Alone" pays homage to the films of Gus Van Sant and Larry Clark. The awkwardness of adolescence, the pangs of first love, and the playfulness of children without supervision are colorfully captured by writer/director Celina Murga.
Class and child neglect
Chris Knipp19 March 2009
This Argentinian director's second film is an ensemble piece about privilege and irresponsibility that focuses almost exclusively on children and adolescents. It can seem at times excruciatingly long because there is so little emphasis on plot, but at the same time Uns semana solos is remarkable in its gradual almost real-time accumulation of mood. The result is that when something finally happens toward the end of the 110 minutes, there is a sense of shock, even though consequences are muted. Murga's achieves a feel of seemingly complete naturalism in the use of the young people. It's a demonstration of the potential power of working slowly and methodically in a low key.
These kids live in a gated community with its own church and school, somewhere not terribly far from Buenos Aires, which few of them have ever visited and which they refer to only as "el Capital." The focus is on one household but there are several families whose offspring play and hang out together all day. Their wealthy parents are away on vacation, leaving them to fend for and amuse themselves, with only a live-in housekeeper, Esther (Natalia Gomez Alarcon). Most of them bus to the same private school, which is still in session, the ostensible reason why they've been left behind. The place is patrolled by what they call "copy cops," who have little power--except to exclude the uninvited, or the non-rich.
Maria (Magdalena Copabianco) is the most mature, and seems the most in charge. Also having some seeming power is the sporty Facundo (Lucas Del Bo). But really no one is in charge, and it's a wonder nothing worse happens.
Murga's strategy is to take us into this world without explanation and to let the young actors be natural, eating snacks, watching TV, playing video games. What happens in school is omitted from the film except to show them leaving it and riding the bus and walking home in their uniforms. There is a certain imbalance here: doesn't anything of interest happen at school? In some ways the filmmakers (Murga and her co-author and producer husband, Juan Villegas) seem as oblivious as their young subjects. But in general their empathy pays off in the seamless sense of mood and milieu.
The portrait of a privileged class might lack dimension without people who don't belong to set it off, and these come through the presence of Esther, and even more, in the surprise arrival of her younger brother, Juan (Ignacio Gimenez), whom the kids' parents have agreed to have come for a stay from his home in the unfashionable region of Entre Rios, a hinterland quite unknown to the kids. It's vacation time at Juan's public school. When he arrives, he must cool his heels for a long time at the gate while repeated phone calls are required to assure that he is allowed in. When he finally gets the go-ahead, he's photographed, like a criminal.
The film is subtle in showing how Juan is excluded from the group. Wisely, the filmmakers have chosen a boy who isn't crude or pinched or poor-looking, but very presentable, tall, sportily dressed, even handsome. But of course that isn't enough to cut through the wall of privilege, and he just isn't welcomed very much. In a way he could just be the "new boy." One kid complains to his mother on the phone that she should have consulted with them before allowing Juan to come, and he wants him sent away. But eventually that is forgotten and little by little Juan blends in, some of the kids talk to him, and he loosens up. But when he's taken to the sports club pool, the boys torment him with warnings that he won't be allowed back if he violates any rules.
Violating rules is something that they all do, however. Right at the beginning the kids wander into other people's houses in the neighborhood to explore them, poke around in drawers and closets, turn TVs and stereos on and off--and there is worse later. The concluding sequences, which follow a party where some of the boys get drunk, are a disturbing, the more so because they and everything leading up to them have been so muted. Perhaps Murga didn't know how to edit this film (it seems in need of some cutting), but the sense of flow and gradual progression are admirable.
Released in Argentina February 19, 2009. Shown as part of the Film Comment Selects series at Lincoln Center, New York, in March 2009.
These kids live in a gated community with its own church and school, somewhere not terribly far from Buenos Aires, which few of them have ever visited and which they refer to only as "el Capital." The focus is on one household but there are several families whose offspring play and hang out together all day. Their wealthy parents are away on vacation, leaving them to fend for and amuse themselves, with only a live-in housekeeper, Esther (Natalia Gomez Alarcon). Most of them bus to the same private school, which is still in session, the ostensible reason why they've been left behind. The place is patrolled by what they call "copy cops," who have little power--except to exclude the uninvited, or the non-rich.
Maria (Magdalena Copabianco) is the most mature, and seems the most in charge. Also having some seeming power is the sporty Facundo (Lucas Del Bo). But really no one is in charge, and it's a wonder nothing worse happens.
Murga's strategy is to take us into this world without explanation and to let the young actors be natural, eating snacks, watching TV, playing video games. What happens in school is omitted from the film except to show them leaving it and riding the bus and walking home in their uniforms. There is a certain imbalance here: doesn't anything of interest happen at school? In some ways the filmmakers (Murga and her co-author and producer husband, Juan Villegas) seem as oblivious as their young subjects. But in general their empathy pays off in the seamless sense of mood and milieu.
The portrait of a privileged class might lack dimension without people who don't belong to set it off, and these come through the presence of Esther, and even more, in the surprise arrival of her younger brother, Juan (Ignacio Gimenez), whom the kids' parents have agreed to have come for a stay from his home in the unfashionable region of Entre Rios, a hinterland quite unknown to the kids. It's vacation time at Juan's public school. When he arrives, he must cool his heels for a long time at the gate while repeated phone calls are required to assure that he is allowed in. When he finally gets the go-ahead, he's photographed, like a criminal.
The film is subtle in showing how Juan is excluded from the group. Wisely, the filmmakers have chosen a boy who isn't crude or pinched or poor-looking, but very presentable, tall, sportily dressed, even handsome. But of course that isn't enough to cut through the wall of privilege, and he just isn't welcomed very much. In a way he could just be the "new boy." One kid complains to his mother on the phone that she should have consulted with them before allowing Juan to come, and he wants him sent away. But eventually that is forgotten and little by little Juan blends in, some of the kids talk to him, and he loosens up. But when he's taken to the sports club pool, the boys torment him with warnings that he won't be allowed back if he violates any rules.
Violating rules is something that they all do, however. Right at the beginning the kids wander into other people's houses in the neighborhood to explore them, poke around in drawers and closets, turn TVs and stereos on and off--and there is worse later. The concluding sequences, which follow a party where some of the boys get drunk, are a disturbing, the more so because they and everything leading up to them have been so muted. Perhaps Murga didn't know how to edit this film (it seems in need of some cutting), but the sense of flow and gradual progression are admirable.
Released in Argentina February 19, 2009. Shown as part of the Film Comment Selects series at Lincoln Center, New York, in March 2009.
Rich and lonely
slabihoud21 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
When you have read the plot synopsis and you expect to see a psycho thriller of sorts you will be very disappointed. But if you are open for surprises and interested in the subject you will see an excellent movie.
The story centers around a bunch of kids and adolescents roaming the grounds of a protected neighborhood while their parents are on vacation. It plays with our expectations based on films of similar subjects and our prejudices about young people and the clashes between rich and poor.
Warning: Spoiler from here on!
During school term a group of children of well to do people living in a sheltered neighborhood with a large park and swimming pools are biding their time with swimming, bike riding, watching TV and playing video games. Many are related to each other, siblings and cousins mostly. Sometimes they climb into empty houses and fool around but without making a mess. Although they act bored and partly frustrated they are still well behaved. Maria, the eldest of the lot is in charge and she takes care that things don't get out of hand. She has a slight crush on her younger cousin, but maybe only out of boredom.
We watch them for quite some time without anything happening. Time passes every day and there is not much to do after the bus brings them back from school. The only grown-up in the household is a 23-year old maid who cooks and cleans up. Other than that we see almost no grown-up inhabitants, only the security guards who regularly check the grounds for break ins and they also have an eye on the children.
The parents call once a day but often only to say that they will stay longer than planned. Most of the kids seem to wait for their return. Then one-day the maid's younger brother comes to help her. Fernando is a poor but good looking chap, obviously impressed by the wealth he encounters and shy around the self-confident kids. The boys mostly ignore him, the girls are more curious but don't know what to talk with him. You can see that he feels neglected and that he has nothing in common with them. They embarrass him with little things. Maria is looking at him sometimes but can't make any move. Meanwhile her cousin gets frustrated when her interest in him suddenly fades.
I sat there and felt a lot of tension only because I expected any moment some violence breaking out on any side. But nothing of this is happening. The film does not invite you to expect anything dangerous, it was only in me. But I'm very sure that most people in the audience had the same feelings. According to movie rules there must be something terrible coming from this combination.
When you see a film like this you will find out how much negative thinking we carry around about young people, anything we read in the news or see in other films. But the reality is often much more quiet. Most of the damage happens to the soul of the involved. All we really see are poor rich kids in a golden cage. We can only hope that one day they will recognize the bars and decide to leave.
The story centers around a bunch of kids and adolescents roaming the grounds of a protected neighborhood while their parents are on vacation. It plays with our expectations based on films of similar subjects and our prejudices about young people and the clashes between rich and poor.
Warning: Spoiler from here on!
During school term a group of children of well to do people living in a sheltered neighborhood with a large park and swimming pools are biding their time with swimming, bike riding, watching TV and playing video games. Many are related to each other, siblings and cousins mostly. Sometimes they climb into empty houses and fool around but without making a mess. Although they act bored and partly frustrated they are still well behaved. Maria, the eldest of the lot is in charge and she takes care that things don't get out of hand. She has a slight crush on her younger cousin, but maybe only out of boredom.
We watch them for quite some time without anything happening. Time passes every day and there is not much to do after the bus brings them back from school. The only grown-up in the household is a 23-year old maid who cooks and cleans up. Other than that we see almost no grown-up inhabitants, only the security guards who regularly check the grounds for break ins and they also have an eye on the children.
The parents call once a day but often only to say that they will stay longer than planned. Most of the kids seem to wait for their return. Then one-day the maid's younger brother comes to help her. Fernando is a poor but good looking chap, obviously impressed by the wealth he encounters and shy around the self-confident kids. The boys mostly ignore him, the girls are more curious but don't know what to talk with him. You can see that he feels neglected and that he has nothing in common with them. They embarrass him with little things. Maria is looking at him sometimes but can't make any move. Meanwhile her cousin gets frustrated when her interest in him suddenly fades.
I sat there and felt a lot of tension only because I expected any moment some violence breaking out on any side. But nothing of this is happening. The film does not invite you to expect anything dangerous, it was only in me. But I'm very sure that most people in the audience had the same feelings. According to movie rules there must be something terrible coming from this combination.
When you see a film like this you will find out how much negative thinking we carry around about young people, anything we read in the news or see in other films. But the reality is often much more quiet. Most of the damage happens to the soul of the involved. All we really see are poor rich kids in a golden cage. We can only hope that one day they will recognize the bars and decide to leave.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
