Married Life (2007) Poster

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
59 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Husband, The Wife, The Mistress and the Best Friend
claudio_carvalho28 February 2011
In 1949, the middle-aged executive Harry (Chris Cooper) and his wife Pat Allen (Patricia Clarkson) are the example of a happily married couple. One day, Harry invites his best friend, the bachelor Richard Langley (Pierce Brosnan), to have lunch with him and Harry tells him that he is in love with the widow Kay Nesbitt (Rachel McAdams). However, he is afraid to ask the divorce to Pat that would have her heart broken. When Kay joins them for having lunch, Richard feels attracted by the sexy woman. Sooner Richard accidentally discovers that Pat has a love affair with an acquaintance, but he does not disclose the situation to Harry or Pat, otherwise he would not have any chance with Kay. Richard dates Kay in many occasions as a friend trying to convince her that Harry would never leave his wife. Meanwhile Harry blends Pat's antiacid with poison expecting to kill her and spare his wife from the humiliation of a divorce. But when Kay breaks with Harry, he realizes that he has just lost his mistress, his best friend and probably his wife.

"Married Life" is a cynical film about the hypocrite relationships among the husband, his wife, his younger mistress and his best friend with a disappointing ending. Narrated by the best friend, the melodramatic story could be shorter and have a better conclusion with black-humor instead of the conventional one. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Vida de Casado" ("Married Life")
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good movie marred by a lame ending. But never fear...
rooprect2 October 2010
The DVD package says this is "a sly & smart comedy", but I have to warn you, that's not exactly what you get. To me, a sly & smart comedy would be "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels" or "Deathtrap" or even "Fargo". While this movie has the same bizarre, criminal elements and intelligent dialogue as the above, I never sensed any outright comedy.

Still, it's well done & definitely worth a watch. Rather than a comedy, I would describe it more as a "drama of errors". The subject of murder is actually handled quite seriously although its casual nature might come across as odd (hence the humour?). There are no real laughs, but the strangeness of the story might elicit a few snorts, chortles, and possibly even a harrumph. But no guffaws.

The acting is excellent, the script is good, the style & direction is smooth & suave, like the 1940s setting it depicts. Some might consider it slow, but I'd say that's a plus because it gives us time to digest the complex themes that are presented such as the incompatible definitions of 'love', the value of loyalty in marriage as well as friendship, and of course the morality of murder.

Overall I liked this film. It's just the dag blasted ending that left me feeling cheated. I won't talk about it except to say that you should watch the alternate endings included on the DVD instead. In particular, Alternate #1 is closer to the book, and it gives us the thematic closure that the theatrical version omits. Alternate ending #1 also has a great piece of acting by Pierce Brosnan which, if it were in the actual movie, would've definitely made me bump up my rating by 1 or 2 stars.

"Married Life" is definitely worth the $2 rental fee. It deviates from the book on several key elements (such as the ending) and as a result doesn't quite wrap things up convincingly. But as far as movies go, it's entertaining, engaging and showcases some great acting talents.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tired Marriage
moutonbear2530 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The biggest problem with MARRIED LIFE, the movie not the state of existence, is the tone set by its title. Before even setting foot in the theatre, your mind is filled with preconceived notions about the likelihoods the film will deliver. You cannot expect a film called MARRIED LIFE to show long term couples just as happy now as they were when they first met. In fact, in these cynical times, you might likely be disappointed if you didn't see spouses abusing each other, scheming and plotting against the other or, if you want to be old fashioned, just plain cheating on each other. Perhaps to offset these expectations, writer/director, Ira Sachs, sets his story in the 1940's, a supposedly simpler time when people were married and stayed that way despite their personal unhappiness. Even a setting as delicately composed as this one is not a good enough disguise for its contemporary sensibility. The film's fate seems sealed as soon as the opening credits begin to roll. Similar in design and manner to television's "Desperate Housewives", a show that has built its reputation on couples scheming, they seem to announce Sach's intention to give us exactly what we expect. Only when the final animated frame settles on a city skyline and you expect the real thing to take its place, Sachs reveals that it is in fact a reflection. With the lens pointing inward now, I wonder if I've spoken too soon.

Like the beginning of a marriage, for a while, it is good. The strings of the score swell and sweep you up into the sentiment like a warm wind taking you for a dance in the sky overlooking a quiet family-friendly suburban street. This particular street is home to Harry and Pat Allen (Chris Cooper and Patricia Clarkson). The two have been married for what might as well be forever and they still cherish and respect each other but whether they still love each other is a question that looms over their lives like a heavy cloud. Harry believes that love is defined by the desire to give constantly to the other person. Pat believes that love is sex. Despite their definitions being categorically on different pages, they are a solid, functional couple. However, Harry has found another woman, Kay (Rachel McAdams in a refreshing return that is more tender and vulnerable than past performances) for whom continuously being doted on is the perfect compliment to her lonely life. I suppose it doesn't hurt that she is younger and beautiful but Harry conveniently avoids seeing this as the motivating factor for his affection.

And so Harry finds himself in quite the pickle. He doesn't want to burden his wife with the embarrassment of a divorce but yet he cannot deny that he is no longer in love with her. Harry is a sensible businessman who lives his life with order and reason and is still able to embrace his more romantic sensibility, wanting his life to embody the love he feels. He racks his brain to come up with the tidiest, most logical solution to his dilemma and somehow, the best plan he can come up with is to kill his wife. He rationalizes that this will cause the least amount of pain to all involved, including his children. Is it me or is this the least rational course of action? Essentially, this becomes MARRIED LIFE's main storyline and as it is ridiculous in concept, it also serves to undermine the intelligence of what was otherwise a fairly engaging film. Even Sachs seems unsure of this whole direction as he throws in a couple of painfully obvious scenes about how death can take away misery rather than add to it. If Sachs isn't buying it, I'm not sure how he thought anyone else would.

Despite its shortcomings, MARRIED LIFE does plant a few seeds of wisdom in its perfectly tended garden. The banalities of spending every day of your life with the same person are accepted by most of the characters as a perfectly normal piece of the pie. With decades past between their time and ours, have we really changed all that much? There are so many things happening and left unsaid in any marriage with both partners none the wiser. Subsequently, we have fine-tuned an uncanny ability to exist in a state of comfortable misery. We may look elsewhere for distraction but so many never walk away from what they know isn't working. Applying that same logic makes sitting through MARRIED LIFE entirely acceptable while you wonder what's playing next door.
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Totally Disagree with "Straight to Betamax"
jegesq4 March 2008
Saw this last night at the premiere, and "Straight to Betamax" could not be more wrong. This is actually the first intelligent, smart and wonderfully acted film of the year, and both Patricia Clarkson and Chris Cooper give wonderful performances in a story which is intriguingly told and compellingly filmed.

I will agree with a few others that Pierce Brosnan seems a bit miscast in this picture, but not to the point that it ruins the film. Additionally, some of Rachel McAdams' dialogue seems a bit out of place for a character like her's during the period in which this story is set (it is supposed to take place in 1949), but she gives a great performance overall and her character is, for the most part (other than a few bad bits of out of place dialogue) fairly believable.

But Cooper and Clarkson are really wonderful in this film and Ira Sachs and company have done a terrific job with this story. Bravo.
64 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Acts of Deception in a Muted, Twisty Homage to Post-WWII Domestic Melodramas
EUyeshima29 December 2009
I think director/co-writer Ira Sachs' subtle 2007 homage to the old-fashioned studio melodramas of the 1940s and 50s could have used more of the Baroque feverishness of a Douglas Sirk ("All That Heaven Allows") to make the adultery-driven plot more intriguing stylistically - perhaps a face slap here, a gun confrontation there, even a shouting match in a restaurant. Instead, Sachs, along with co-writer Oren Moverman ("The Messenger"), downplays the overripe theatrics in favor of a more Hitchcockian approach to their noirish fable about the transient rules of love and deception. The resulting film is fun to watch due to its faithful period depiction but sometimes little more than a moral exercise in punishing the subversive thoughts and actions of the seemingly staid protagonist.

It's 1949, and the plot centers on Harry, a middle-aged and very married Manhattan executive, who finds himself in love with the much younger Kay, a WWII widow who enjoys the attention of a man so devoted to her. Harry decides he cannot divorce his wife Pat for fear of breaking her heart. In fact, he thinks it's more charitable to murder her by poisoning her digestive powder which she takes religiously every day. Harry's best friend Richard is aware of Harry's intentions and gets caught in the middle trying to save the marriage while finding himself becoming attracted to Kay as well. Not quite the victim she would seem to be, Pat has secrets of her own, which leads to a roundelay of events befitting the increasingly uneasy blend of treachery and absolution. Sachs capably keeps things afloat even when the suspense factor appears overly muted.

A smart quartet of actors has been cast beginning with Chris Cooper ("Adaptation") effectively embodying the crushed soul that Harry has become. Providing the voice-over narration from his character's limited perspective, Pierce Brosnan ("The Matador") uses his naturally erudite manner to great wry effect as Richard, while Patricia Clarkson ("Whatever Works") gives added dimensions of knowingness and cunning to Pat. With her hair dyed an unflattering peroxide blonde, Rachel McAdams ("The Notebook") looks poised to play the femme fatale, but her character is more ingenuous than she looks. That basically means McAdams has little bandwidth to add any complex shading to Kay. The 2008 DVD offers an informative commentary from Sachs, the theatrical trailer, and three alternate endings, each flash-forwarding the story sixteen years later to O. Henry-type resolutions. While interesting, none really add that much to the ending used in the movie.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Harry and Pat and Richard and Kay
jotix10020 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Harry has a big surprise in store for his friend Richard. The invitation to lunch is only an excuse for Harry to reveal to Richard he is in love with another woman, Kay. At the same time, Harry confesses his doubts of how Pat, his wife, will take the news he will be leaving her. Harry strongly believes Pat is too dependent on him and the shock his betrayal will have on her. Harry wants to come clean to Richard, even introducing the young woman to his friend for what appears to be his approval. What Harry does not count on is that Richard will take a fancy to Kay!

Pat, the suburban wife, suffers from a bad stomach. The medicine she takes to relieve her problem presents an opportunity for Harry to plan to murder her. Richard is shocked when he finds Pat at their cottage in the company of another man. She also comes clean to Richard, who realizes Harry's guilt is unfounded and that Pat is much stronger than she is given credit for. Richard, who is the narrator of the story, is instrumental in triggering guilt in Harry's mind, when he catches Kay with the man he thought to be his real friend and makes him think twice before committing a crime that will carry a prison sentence.

Ira Sachs, the director of "Married Life" shows an affinity to the master of the melodrama, Douglas Sirk. The screenplay, co-written with Oren Moverman, has a style that makes the viewer recall that genre in which Mr. Sirk made valuable contributions. Mr. Sachs directed with an eye for style. The late 1940s are recreated faithfully in dining rooms for executives drinking dry martinis and smoking, as well as the decor of the era. The film is a mixture of melodrama and suspense as Harry concocts his plan to get rid of the situation he finds himself in. The film is based on a novel by John Bingham "Five Roundabouts to Heaven".

Chris Cooper plays against type. He is does not appear to be comfortable with the Harry he is supposed to portrait. Patricia Clarkson, on the other hand, proves here she cannot do wrong in anything she plays. Her Pat is another triumph for the actress. Pierce Brosnan makes an excellent Richard, working with great economy to show what this man is like. The only disappointment is Rachel McAdams who appears to be much younger for both the men she is to be attracted. Appearing as a blonde, she fits well in the context of the story even if one cannot believe for a moment she feels anything for either man in love with her.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
fine cast lifts under-cooked melodrama
Buddy-5114 January 2011
Based on the 1953 novel "Five Roundabouts to Heaven" by John Bigham, "Married Life" - co-written by Oren Moverman and Ira Sachs, and directed by Sachs - is a throwback to all those florid film noir melodramas in which a bored husband (Chris Cooper) plots to do away with his wife (Patricia Clarkson) so he can start a life with his mistress, a leggy, blonde widow (Rachel McAdams) whose husband died in the war. Pierce Brosnan plays Cooper's best friend, a womanizing bachelor who, naturally, falls in love with the mistress, and who provides the overly-sincere, laughably self-conscious narration for the tale.

Though this kind of thing's been done much better in other films ("Double Indemnity," "The Postman Always Rings Twice" and "How to Murder Your Wife" spring immediately to mind), solid performances from an A-list cast, rich period detail (the movie is set in 1949), and an interesting subtext about marriage meaning different things to different people ultimately make it palatable.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Marriage woes of a solemn fool
Chris Knipp20 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Ira Sachs' 'Forty Shades of Blue' was a story about a young Russian émigré woman and her American music impresario husband who isn't really there for her—it's a movie that's rambling, freshly observed, carefully planted in its southern milieu, and vérité in style. For his new feature Sachs was granted the opportunity to work in the Hollywood system with name actors, and he chose to shift gears completely. He adapted an old "genre" novel (his word) by John Bingham, who was John Le Carré's mentor in MI5 and the model for Le Carré's iconic character, George Smiley. 'Married Life' is a glossy period story with ironic twists. It's set in the early Fifties. Partly a social comedy, partly a 'tongue-in-cheek thriller, partly a perverse love story, it weaves back and forth a bit too much among all these possibilities to leave a lasting impression. It's a glossy, stylishly controlled inanity all ready for the collector's shelf.

Harry Allen (Chris Cooper) wants to run off with a young blonde and thinks he must kill his wife to spare her the pain of divorce. That's a new kind of mercy killing, a droll motive for murder. Whether it's a good pretext for a meditation on relationships and love, as the director believes, is another question. A greater awareness of the period might have led to the observation that divorce itself, at that time a somewhat scandalous social institution, was more disturbing than the mere psychological loss of a loved one.

Sachs is a gay man approaching straight marriage through the filter of a penchant for Joan Crawford and Bette Davis movies, much as Todd Hughes approached a Fifties interracial affair and a married man's homosexuality through the filter of Douglas Sirk melodramas in his 'Far from Heaven'—which, like this movie, featured Patricia Clarkson as the wife. 'Married Life' is more restrained than the style-obsessed 'Far from Heaven.' But though it annoys less, it does not impress as much. Both movies are feasts of campy gay cinematic style, but while Haynes launched a thousand hot debates, 'Married Life' makes one nod "Oh yes," and move on.

With its world of stifling bourgeois poshlost and its bumbling, trapped killer, this film is reminiscent of some of the minor novels of Vladimir Nabokov. And that would be a good thing, if only Sachs were Nabokov; but he isn't. Sachs' protagonist, Harry Allen, is a solemn fool. He goes about planning his murder, unaware that introducing his friend Richard Langley (a pleasant, but somewhat stilted, Pierce Brosnan) to his new girlfriend Kay (Rachel McAdams), a young widow, is a very risky move, given that she's an out-and-out babe and Richard is appealing, available, and drives a nice convertible. Anyone with an emotional IQ of 100 would see Richard has more charm than the dour Harry; but Harry's level is well below average, even for the disdainful 21st century conception of the American Fifties. Harry's also seriously mistaken about his wife Pat (Ms. Clarkson, in a dark red wig): she has other quite appetizing possibilities he isn't in the least aware of.

The movie advances at a measured pace with all its period accouterments tidily in place. Everyone has dyed hair and Chris Cooper's apparent proclivity for very dark suits is immaculately in evidence. An atmosphere of great restraint is created, the better to stun us with the story's bombshells. But it never really does.

While in 'Far from Heaven' the emotions were ramped up and operatic, those of 'Married Life' cause barely a ripple. People say they love each other, but we don't feel it and there's no visible chemistry between the actors. There is some limited compensation in the dry comedy of certain lines of dialog. There is stylized, if wan, amusement in the repetition of an idea, "a person like you can't build happiness on the suffering of others, not with the burden of morality you carry," spoken unwittingly by several characters. But that's not exactly an epigram. True, there's something unique about the confection Sachs has so carefully whipped up. But while this is more coherent than Hayne's Fifties melodrama, it utterly lacks its impact.

According to Sachs, 'Five Roundabouts to Heaven,' Bingham's source novel, ends with a lot of people dying. That might have been nice. Couples deciding to stay together after all? Gee, this is quite the time for Family Values. 'Married Life' ends with a solemnity so completely worthy of its humorless hero one may wonder if one's earlier giggles had been intended.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It fizzled
sergepesic4 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The well to do, middle-aged American couple, seems to be in a middle of a marital crisis. The husband is in love with a much younger women and seeks complete happiness. Well it has to be a fly in that particular ointment. " Married Life" tries to be a clever pastiche set in 1949, when women were glamorous and desperately needed protection, or that's what martini swilling, two pack a day smoking men,liked to think. So, the movie tries to be smart and amusing and a bit suspenseful, but it fails in that endeavor. With all the stirred emotions and betrayals and deceptions, in the end it doesn't go anywhere. It just fizzles and expects us to feel buzzed and refreshed.Sorry, I definitely wasn't.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Much like Ben Affleck in Phantoms, Patricia Clarkson is the bomb in Married Life
MBunge23 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Married Life is the sweetest, most tender movie you'll ever see about a man who wants to kills his wife so he can be with his young girlfriend.

In post-WWII America, Harry Allen and Richard Langley (Chris Cooper and Pierce Brosnan) are two old friends who couldn't be more different. Harry is happily married and romantic. Rich is a confirmed bachelor and cynic in the ways of love. Then one day, Rich hears something he never expected from his friend. Harry is having an affair. He still loves his wife Pat (Patricia Clarkson), but Harry has become frustrated and unfulfilled by Pat's determined unsentimentality. Harry doesn't want a good and loving companion, he wants a soul mate and he thinks he's found one in Kay Nesbitt (Rachel McAdams). Harry even introduces Kay to Rich, confident that his friend will keep his secret.

The problem is that Harry still cares about Pat and can't stand the idea of the pain and embarrassment a divorce would cause her. T hings are further complicated when Rich finds himself drawn to Kay, and then discovers something about Pat that could solve Harry's problem. Rich turns that information to his benefit, however, without ever knowing that Harry has decided the only way out of his predicament is to kill Pat. Harry thinks it's the kindest thing he can do, but discovers that killing your wife is a much thornier problem than he expected, both practically and emotionally.

If you just consider the plot, Married Life seems like a noirish thriller. It's really a relaxed and heartfelt meditation on the sanctity of marriage and how that union can prosper and satisfy, if you can protect it from the challenges of desire and impatience. It asks us to consider two people who get everything they need from each other, yet are willing to throw that away because they can't have what they want. You expect Harry to learn a lesson from his adulterous and murder-planning ways, but he doesn't learn the lesson you expected.

The acting in this movie is quite good, if a bit low key. Chris Cooper does a nice job not letting Harry collapse into a caricature. Instead of letting Harry seem like a selfish hypocrite, Cooper shows us a man whose deep emotions are simply running away with him. Brosnan is also good as the more worldly Rich who secretly envies the peace and care of his friend's marriage. Rachel McAdams is exceptionally beautiful as Kay, but her performance is unexceptional. You can understand why Harry and Rich would fall in lust with her, but McAdams never gives the character enough to make us believe they would fall madly in love with her. But the star of the show is Patricia Clarkson. She is ceaselessly charming and endearing as Pat, even more so when we discover there's more to her than just being a devoted wife.

Now, there are a couple of plot twists that are tough to swallow and the film appears to be in complete denial about the fact that McAdams looks young enough to be Cooper or Brosnan's daughter. It's one thing for "the other woman" to be much younger when the story is on the page, but when you see a couple of middle aged men enamored with a woman at least 20 years younger than they are, there are certain inescapable implications which flow from that dynamic. The age difference should say something about the relationships between Harry and Kay and Rich and Kay. Married Life, however, just cruises along without even vaguely acknowledging those implications.

A lot of stories talk about love. Far fewer talk about marriage. Even less than that focus on marriage as it actually is. Married Life is a light, funny and appealing entry into that minuscule third category. If you've ever wanted to kill the person you love, definitely give it a look.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Lanquish of Anguish
zardoz-1312 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
"Forty Shades of Blue" director Ira Sachs and "The Messenger" scenarist Oren Moverman adapt British author John Bingham's pulp thriller "Five Roundabouts to Heaven" and convert it into an ironic, above-average, soap operatic potboiler. Incidentally, Bingham worked in British Intelligence during World War II so he knew something about clandestine affairs. Nevertheless, this smoldering, claustrophobic period piece about infidelity, attempted homicide and reconciliation among married couples and their single friends rarely generates combustible passion. Chris Cooper of "Breach" delivers the best performance in the most complex role as a murderous husband cheating on his wife. The top-notch cast includes former James Bond Pierce Brosnan, the beautiful Rachel McAdams, Patricia Clarkson, and David Wenham in this concise, respectable 90-minute PG-13 rated opus. "Married Live" seems like it got the short shrift from Sony Pictures Classics. If you have any doubts, you should check out the DVD special features where no less than three alternate endings are available. Despite the sterling performances and the faithfully recreated period detail, this movie remains curiously aloof and uninvolving. Meantime, the filmmakers appear to suffer from schizophrenia. Neither Sachs nor Moverman could reach a decision about whether "Married Lives" was supposed to be a genre piece, social commentary, a turgid soaper, a black comedy or a film noir murder. Sachs and Moverman alternate these diverse narrative styles in such a helter-skelter fashion that "Married Lives" lacks cohesion.

Sachs steeps us in period flavor with animated opening credits that capture the atmosphere of the 1950s. The story unfolds on September 5, 1949. As the narrator of "Married Life," Richard Langley (Pierce Brosnan of "Die Another Day") introduces us to the protagonist, Harry Allen (Chris Cooper), with whom he has been friends with since childhood. Harry is a well-heeled businessman in an anonymous metropolis in the far Northwest with an office whose picture window overlooks the sprawling city. He has been married to his wife Pat (Patricia Clarkson of "The Dead Pool") and their offspring has left home. Richard expresses a jaundiced view of marriage and describes it as "a mild kind of illness like the flu or chicken pox" from which he has maintained immunity. Of course, this immunity proves to be ephemeral. Anyway, Harry summons Richard to a diner so that he can meet his younger, bottle-blonde, sweetheart, Kay Nesbitt (radiate Rachel McAdams of "The Family Stone"), with whom he has been indulging himself. He confides in Richard that he plans to leave Pat because he wants to be "truly happy." This surprises Richard since he thought Harry and Pat had "a pretty good marriage." More to the point, Richard thinks of their marriage as "the most successful marriage" that he has ever known. Ironically, Harry wants to leave his wife because she sees marriage as purely physical, in other words, nothing but sex. Pat thinks Harry is a hopeless sentimentalist that he values romance above physical contact. Richard finds Harry's attitude amusing. "We all have to put up with somethings in life, Harry." He adds, "We can't have everything." Harry introduces Richard to Kay in the first scene in a restaurant. Caddish Richard, who indulges himself with a different woman every week, manages to seduce Kay away from Harry. Meanwhile, Harry plans to poison Pat because he cannot muster the courage to tell her about his extramarital affair. Moreover, Harry cannot live with the thought that Pat would suffer grievously after he leaves her. Ironically, Pat vocalizes the same sentiments about Harry when Richard catches John O'Brien (David Wenham of "300") at Harry and Pat's cabin in the woods. Indeed, poor, ignorant Harry has no clue that Pat has seduced another married man until later in the action. Harry has gone out and bought poison and he puts it in Pat's indigestion medicine. During a late-night ride from Kay's house, Harry picked up a hitchhiker Alvin Walters (Timothy Webber of "Terror Train") who tells our protagonist about how he has to poison a relative that was suffering unendurable agony. The poison finished her off quickly. Harry buys the poison and tries it out on their pet dog to determine its power. Richard almost lets the cat out of the bag to Pat about her husband's philandering. Later, Richard steals Kay away from Harry, and our protagonist scrambles home to save Pat from drinking her spiked medicine.

Loquacious dialogue scenes constitute the bulk of the action in "Married Lives." In this respect, Richard has the choicest lines and one that gets repeated the most often underscores the irony of this domestic drama. Richard believes that you cannot derive happiness from the unhappiness of other people. This would involve a "burden of conscience" which—according to Harry—and later Kay—neither Harry nor Pat can do. If you enjoy subdued movies where the characters never fly off the handle and scream at each, then "Married Life" may entertain you. Unfortunately, all of this intrigue leads nowhere and "Married Life" winds up being cautionary rather than combustible.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not what it seems...
b108rok18 March 2008
Before I saw this film, I knew two things about it: The 4 lead actors, and it took place in the early 50's. After seeing Patricia Clarkson in "Far From Heaven," I was anxious to see her play in this period again.

I have to say I was pleasantly surprised by this film. At first I didn't know what to make of it, or where it was going. It is a dark comedy. The twists and turns of the film are completely unexpected. It kept me on my toes, and the 4 lead performances were great.

Without going into the synopsis too much (you can find that anywhere) if I had to compare this film to another..... I'd say it's kind of a darker, funnier "Closer", but set in the early 50's.

What I found interesting about the film is that it was incredibly complex, well-written characters, in very complex situations, set in a very simple time.

Let's talk about Patricia Clarkson for a minute. This is an actress who should've been nominated for several Supporting Actress Oscars by now. (The Green Mile, All The Real Girls, Far From Heaven, Lars and the Real Girl.. to name a few). I hope she finally gets some recognition as the Leading Actress in this film.

Rachel McAdams: This proves her acting abilities. She is incredible in this film. She is so beautiful, subtle, and so commanding. Definitely her most mature role to date.

Of course, I expect nothing less from Oscar-winner Chris Cooper. This proves to me though that he can carry a film, and not just be a strong supporting character.

Brosnan is great too in the least "meaty" I'd say of the 4 leading roles. He is very suave, but also provides some unexpected comic relief.

Great film! Go and see this.
42 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So close to good...
victoryman17 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The Summary: A friend pines for his best friend's mistress as the best friend plots to off his wife rather than make her suffer the pain of divorce.

The Good: Often funny, with mostly spot-on performances, especially Pierce Brosnan and Chris Cooper. Brosnan's narration is inspired writing! Beautiful cinematography and set design as well. Good sense of place and time.

The Not So Good: The character relationships felt forced (they didn't feel like they knew one another) and something was lacking in the sense of urgency. I feel the twists weren't quite twisty enough. The best audience experiences are ones where I guess the ending, but end up not only being wrong, but even more pleased with the ending the filmmakers came up with. This, you can guess early on. As for the climax, it's a repeat of an earlier scene with the same end result so the "oomph factor" is gone. And as a Rachel McAdams fan, I was sad to see her so underutilized. She really only has about 10 minutes of screen time. If this is the girl worth betraying your best friend and killing your wife for, we need to see more of her to see why. Pretty just doesn't cut it.
9 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Rather Unimpressive
heffay1114 March 2008
I saw this movie last night and was really looking forward to it. I had the expectation based on the preview that it was going to be a clever dark comedy with interesting plot twists to keep me on my toes. I tell you this, so that you know my perspective. I was very disappointed, because although there were a few laughs here and there, this movie is actually very dull. If the expectation is that you are seeing a somber period piece that boils down to a quiet meditation on a flawed marriage, and that this meditation is rather superficial, perhaps you will like it better than I did.

Forgive me for saying this, but at the Q&A after the screening I got the feeling that Chris Cooper and Patricia Clarkson saw this one as a job. They were intrigued by the material, but soon found themselves doing very little on screen. Patricia Clarkson has one scene with three to four lines of interesting dialog, and after that, her character devolves into a stereotype. Chris Cooper gets to play a good range of emotion now and then, but in the end he was forced to play a stereotype as well. I cannot help but say that all of the actors involved came to this period piece and submitted to the vision of the director, only to find that he really didn't have one.

This movie truly suffers for this reason. The plot is very linear with few twists or surprises. The characters are very superficial and behave inconsistently at times, coming across as simple stereotypes. And the film is rarely engaging as a drama and occasionally clever as a comedy.

It is a shame to see a cast this strong stand around and wonder why they are bored. But if you happen to see it and know what to expect, perhaps it can be enjoyed for what it is; a simple tale about a marriage that could have been a short film.
16 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
To End A Marriage To End A Life
Chrysanthepop5 September 2008
Ira Sachs's dark comedy 'Married Life' is an intriguing little film set in the 40s/50s. Dealing with complex relations, it somewhat portrays the men as selfish and the female as hungry for love...but there are layers and it's not all so black and white. What's also interesting is the unusual cast that includes Pierce Brosnan, Patricia Clarkson, Chris Cooper and a refreshing Rachel McAdams. Though the pairing between McAdams and Brosnan is awkward, the chemistry works better between her and Cooper. Brosnan seems miscast but not to the extent that it ruins the film experience. McAdams is beautiful and pulls off her part quite well but it is Clarkson and Cooper who give the best performances. I'm also surprised that people have taken this film too seriously (to the point that they missed the humour which I thought was creatively done and hilarious). The element of drama is there but how could one miss the comedy? Sach's writing is superb and the direction is solid. I liked how the events unfold and Coopers's character's attempts to get what he wants and his surprise reaction towards the unexpected results. I find the title a little misleading. Yes, the film is about a 'dying' marriage and its complexities but the title is a little too vague and the film focuses on much more than marriage. The score gracefully brings the feel of the 40s. Overall, Sachs has made a clever unconventional black comedy in a period piece.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Betrayals abound in "innocent" 1950s American marriages
maurice_yacowar21 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Two decisions determine this film's perspective on the duplicities and compromises that characterize modern American marriage.

Director Ira Sachs sets the film in the suburban and executive posh of 1949. That's the golden age of naive illusions about marriage. Peyton Place had yet to puncture the pretence to suburban innocence. The buoyant voice of Doris Day sets off the cheer, promising she can't give us anything but love, baby. Here the lovers dish out as much duplicity as love.

Hence the gloss and brightness in every domestic scene and the affluence of the business and club settings. Indeed the film evokes the bright style of the master of '50s melodrama, Douglas Sirk, attended by his detachment and satiric bite. Of course the historic setting still implicates contemporary marriage as well. Marriage is marriage.

Sachs' second decision is to cast as narrator the slickest and most dishonourable character, Richard (the ever-suave Pierce Brosnan). That's like Iago getting the direct addresses to his audience, which immediately poisons the viewer's perspective upon the saintly Othello.

Initially Richard confirms his opposition to marriage. He ends up marrying the chirpy Kay (Rachel MacAdams) himself. To get there he has to betray his prosaic best friend Harry (Chris Cooper), who's planning to kill his wife Pat (Patricia Clarkson) so he can marry Kay. Richard also helps Pat conceal her illicit affair. Of course Richard serves mainly his own end, to win Kay for himself. Richard initiates the repeated bromide: "I'm not at all certain that one can build happiness upon the unhappiness of someone else" - especially not someone with our moral sense!

Despite being a war widow, Kay seems childlike in her wide eyes, glowing hair and smile, and her principal principle: "A woman needs to be loved, and that's true. But it's not the whole truth. She also needs somebody to love." That's the '50s sense of "the woman's place." She's as ripe for Richard's seduction as she was to salvage the lachrymose Harry.

The film ends on the neighbourhood's happy couples playing charades - an apt metaphor for the reduction of love and marriage to shallow performances. After all, as Richard confidently assumes: "Whoever in this room who knows what goes on in the mind of the person who sleeps next to you... please, raise your hand... I know you can't, not honestly." Finally, Pat and Harry move silently together cleaning up after the guests. Their harmony is as deep as ever, now built upon their respective abandoned passions. That shot - from outside, through the living room window - echoes the first: Harry's insubstantial reflection on his high office window, while his duplicitous best friend Richard introduces him and his tale.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Blessed Relief
ferguson-629 March 2008
Greetings again from the darkness. Drab adaptation based on John Bingham's book. Views a bit like a play but provides absolutely no drama and little insight. The funniest bit was trying to count the number of cigarettes! Chris Cooper stars as a discontented rich married guy who thinks he has found true love in the young hot widow played by Rachel McAdams. Cooper's longtime wife is played by the always terrific Patricia Clarkson in a underwritten role where she still manages to bring a spark. The narrator and grand marshall is Pierce Brosnan who is best friends with Cooper and strangely drawn to McAdams himself.

Isolation, desperation and selfishness are all themes and none are especially interesting. The suspense is gone the first time we see Cooper introduce McAdams and the whole poisoning thing is straight out of a cheesy 1940's film. Lack of depth to this story, no real suspense and a goofy ending all lead to a mediocre film with nothing new to offer ... except the cool opening credit sequence.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining, though far-fetched
dzlz10512 February 2010
This movie was an entertaining, engrossing way to spend a couple of hours in the middle of the night, though it is more like an episode of Alfred Hitchcock presents than a fully developed dramatic piece. The plot is more like an exercise for straw men (and women) than a realistic slice of life, but if you look at it in that fashion, it is enjoyable.

I found the movie more humorous than other reviewers have indicated. The idea that a man could seriously believe that killing his wife is more merciful than subjecting her to the indignity of divorce is intrinsically tongue-in-cheek. Patricia Clarkson was superb in the part of Pat, the not-so-innocent wife.

Also worth noting is the way Richard, played by Pierce Brosnan, mouths the same platitudes to each character in succession, all while maintaining a look of utter innocence. Then Kay, the Hitchkockian-blond girlfriend, parrots his words right back to her unsuspecting married lover, played with an air of hangdog desperation by Chris Cooper. One wonders what Kay sees in him -- he looks old enough to be her grandfather and seems to be in a permanent funk.

Most ridiculously is the way that all the characters live happily (or at least placidly) ever after, with all the protagonists, and other unidentified friends, getting together for a rousing game of charades.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Is this really noir?
aedine3515 October 2008
I give this movie 6 stars. Art-wise it started out very exciting. When faced with the burden of choosing from a stack of about 15 DVDs last night, this film leaped out at me at once because i really like just about any period piece unless it's very poorly done or very dull. This one was neither, but still somewhat lackluster.

Pierce Brosnan does seem out of place as one reviewer pointed out. Not sure the right haircut would have helped. Moreover, i did not get a sense that any of the characters, with the exception of Rachel McAdams, were of the era. Maybe that's because i'm too young to think anyone talked normally in 1948 but rather, behaved according to my celluloid-biased impression which means more formally, or stiffly, like McAdam's character seems to do. Also, that' what i was expecting with a noir film set in 1948 and what - i think - might have been the intention here. or maybe not.

Most egregiously in my mind: we are not led to understand why such a gorgeous, still quite young Rachel McAdams would go for either of the 2 dessicated old jerks preying upon her. Were all the good younger men killed in the war!? ? Both these men could be her father.

I found the suspense to be pretty good toward the end but then found the ending anticlimactic, since - as previously mentioned - i was expecting more of a classic noir ending replete with a more thrilling ending. Too bad.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring
felinetitanic11 January 2015
This movie was so boring -- it was painful to watch. I had to force myself to watch it to the end, I kept hoping it would get better considering the good actors in it, Pierce Brosnan especially since he is really handsome and sexy. The actors all seemed to do the best they could but it was just boring. It never got better. It wasn't funny, it wasn't dramatic. It was tedious at best. All good actors make a dud and this was it for all of them. There was no story really, it jumped around. it was all about adultery, cheating, the buddy trying to help out. The music was irritating. The story that was there was not clearly told and the talking over the scenes and the explanations did not help. In fact, that was irritating too.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Married Life is so-so! Heard that one before!
meeza10 June 2008
Probably the scariest movie title of the year! Kidding! "Married Life" satirizes the constant secrecy and everyday hypocrisy of the nuptials. The film stars Chris Cooper and Patricia Clarkson as Harry & Pat Allen, an upper-middle class middle-age couple in the 1940's. Try to say that 10 times! Harry is having an affair with the voluptuous Kay played by the voluptuous Rachel McAdams; so one can say that Harry is an avid fan of those Not-Married Kay Cosmetics. However, Pat does has secrets of her own which I stand "pat" not to reveal at this time. Did I mention that Harry wants to poison Pat? Oh, did I give away too much or was that my poison pen talking? Anyways, we continue the "Married Life". Here comes Dick, in the form of Richard Langley (played by Pierce Brosnan) who is Harry's best friend who has a manipulative & suave plan to take his Kay from Harry and eat her too. Yes, "Married Life" is probably based on a zillion true stories of adultery, egoism, and manipulation that transpire in marriages. By setting the film in the 40's, Director Ira Sachs gives the film a different generational take on the marriage mischievousness but with the same self-centered overtones. Sachs did a commendable job in his direction, but his dry screenplay with co-scripter Oren Moverman should have been annulled from the start. Our esteemed acting "cuatreros" (Cooper, Clarkson, McDormand, Brosnan) were positively "thespianly" committed to their characters in "Married Life" but I have seen better character relationships from these great actors in previous roles. The film "Married Life" is pretty much like marriage itself: exciting and discoverable in the beginning but mediocre and monotonous in the end. *** Average
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Masterpiece Theatre goes to the movies
bobbobwhite1 April 2008
In look, this film reminded me so much of those wonderful BBC shows of the 70's and 80's that I wanted to love it, but its flawed story and direction made it a disappointment. This film missed so many chances at greatness. Simple scene additions and subtractions were necessary but were overlooked due to poor story development. We went for our Chris Cooper fix and he did not disappoint, but as stated, the story and the director let him down. Certain scenes were overdone or underdone in the wrong places, such as the scene where he bought poison and kept giving so many halting, stalling, guilty looks until I just about yelled, "enough with the guilty looks, Chris, we get it." And, the "can't we all now just be friends" attitude of the denouement after all the treachery and deception and murderous intent throughout was really lame and unrealistic. A film set in the 40's made now is still a modern film for modern audiences, and the censored and prudish film-making attitudes of the 40's are long gone and forgotten, thank goodness, even if this filmmaker's attempt was to duplicate the look of those pretty sappy film years. At least he did that well.

The film did have the great look of 40's films, terrific period costuming, and great camera-work and lighting. Sets were art deco wonderful too, so it shocked me that in this fine looking film the director missed so many story chances to make it a great film. Among other crucial things stated above, he sold out for the easy and typical, feel-good Hollywood ending, even when it did not fit the rest of the story at all and it would have been much better and more realistic if more serious and unfriendly, and not so "is everybody happy now with this 40's era ending?" Yuk.

The most disappointing thing, other than the sappy, pat ending that really was a shame, were missing story scenes near the end that were needed to finish this story of deception and pain and thus make it into a more serious and believable tale of the damaging results of lost love due to treachery, as this director obviously has a problem with consistent and complete story development, and has no idea how to end one in the most effective manner.

Patricia Clarkson was effective as Cooper's betrayed and betraying wife, as were Pierce Brosnan and Rachal McAdams in lead roles, and Cooper was his usual great presence as the star. His well lived-in, soulful face is so effective in these damaged-man roles that he almost owns the casting for them. However, I would love to have the chance to re-edit this film, adding at least two crucial scenes near the end and subtracting two very lame and disappointing scenes closer to the end.......the dinner of the two couples together where it looked like nothing hurtful ever happened to any of them, everyone was just so nice and polite with each other, and the moronic end scene where the whole gang was playing a party game and laughing. It was so stupid, vapid, sappy and out of place in this otherwise serious film that it ruined the story for me and left me thinking of yet another great chance lost.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A smart and insightful exploration of social mores
suepsimon5 March 2008
I love MARRIED LIFE!! It is a well crafted and beautifully written movie. By appearing to be a traditional noir, the film plays on the audience's expectations of the genre but then turns out to be something very different--something far more sad, funny and soulful. By having the traditional voice-over and haunting music at the outset, MARRIED LIFE subverts the viewer's expectations and draws us into a story that is utterly unique.

Characters in the film are not whom they appear to be--I like how all the leads are introduced as archetypes (e.g., the unhappily married business man, the cad, the long suffering wife, the pretty young widow) but each not only turns out to be different than expected, all four go through some sort of transition that deepens their humanity. They may be imperfect people and lacking in insight, but the audience feels empathy for their struggles. Given their array of poor choices, this is pretty amazing--their yearnings are poignant, even when their actions are deeply misguided. Humans are capable of being incredibly narcissistic and giving at the same time--the movie illustrates this with a mix of humor and pathos. The characters may be unable or unwilling to stop their most primal urges, yet we are rooting for them to find some happiness all the way to the end.

This film is wonderfully shot. Period details are rendered with loving care--whether it is the glorious costumes or the sweeping set design. Performances are top notch -- a true ensemble cast who look and sound like they are from a bygone era. A rich score magnifies the shifting moods without giving you whiplash. This is a complex movie that demands we see the world in shades of gray -- life is never simple. Especially married life!
47 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a bad marriage drama with more going on than expected
blott2319-15 November 2021
When you start watching Married Life it feels like it's going to be the typical melodrama about philandering spouses and disloyal friends, which I was not at all interested in sitting through for 90 minutes. I wanted to give it a chance because I like all of the primary cast members, but I have never been fond of watching the dissolution of a marriage, and how mean-spirited the people become. However, this isn't quite that kind of movie. There's more going on here which leads it down the path of a crime drama. I can't say it was the best story of this type out there, but it was much better than what I anticipated, and I was excited to see what would come next. At one point the movie almost becomes a thriller with some noir vibes, where I felt myself inching towards the edge of my seat. I had no idea where the story might go next and found myself surprisingly worried about the character who probably is the most villainous in the film. The final resolution was a bit underwhelming, but seemed logical based on the story that was presented up to that point. I'm happy to say that, even though Married Life isn't amazing, it is a much better film than I anticipated, and one that I might even watch again someday.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Straight to Betamax
seamallowance14 February 2008
Great actors doing great acting, great period-correct wardrobe, great period-correct cars. Every detail perfect. Sadly, that is just not enough to make a movie.

There is no "punch" to this flick. You keep waiting for a surprise, any surprise. But no. Nada. Zilch. The story is so predictable it is as though they use "Microsoft Script Wizard" to write it for them.

Also: Pierce Brosnan is miscast in this picture. It's not his fault, but he just doesn't belong here. Doesn't fit, isn't believable. Plus: his haircut is contemporary, not 1949. Nice duds though. Wardrobe did a great job all through this movie.

Do yourself a favor: skip this movie.

Rent any old DVD of "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" instead.
21 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed