The Signal (2007) Poster

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
140 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Scientists had warned that the control and manipulation of a human brain was a terrifying possibility.
Fella_shibby11 April 2021
I saw this for the first time in 2008 on a dvd which I own. I bought the dvd without watching the trailer or reading any imdb reviews. I found the poster cool n it has a very glowing review by aint it cool news.

When i saw this for the first time, i found it to be surreal n a different take on the "crazies". But aft revisiting it recently, i found it to be a bit lengthy with some irritating flickering lights n non linear approach and a not so cool ambiguous ending.

The film has lots of gore, some scary situations n a hilarious decapitated head talking scene.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Low Budget Visionary MASTERPIECE!!!
flyroundee13 June 2008
I rented this flick hearing rumors it was good, damn was that an understatement. This movie was mind-blowing. Being an indie filmmaker myself, I was amazed at the simple creativity, style and thought that went into this gem. Being written and directed by three individuals had me a little skeptical, but it definitely worked in their favour.

First off, the begginning of the film got my attention right off the bat, It was quick, stylish and bold. The following first sequence was just as striking. It moved with lightening pace and with intensity. The middle section added some great dead-pan humour, that I found myself laughing out loud at, then literally jumping back into suspense and intensity. The last third of the film, rounded the story out in a realistic and grim style, that also stood out on it's own. I didn't want this movie to end.

The characters were very well developed throughout the story, and added to the humour and chills, slipping seamlessly from humorous situations, to the insane and horrific. The fx were excellent and not over used.

Overall, I'd have to say the story, though conceived before in other ways, worked soo damn well here because of the way it was brought about by the directors. Kudos to the filmmakers for a very sic, groundbreaking and inspiring piece of work.
52 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
flick full with twist and turns and dark humor and gore
trashgang26 August 2012
It took me 5 years to come across this flick. I have seen it and i must say that I liked it. It starts of in pure slasher style and you do not know what is going on. But I thought something was wrong with the DVD. I wont spoil what but after a while you will get it.

Once the flick really starts you will have 3 parts, or transmissions. The first and the last were for me the best part. The second part moves a bit away from the horror and turns into dark comedy. But still it do contains cruelty and gore.

It's that kind of flick you have to watch closely because so much is going on. You will have flash backs towards scene's and seen in from other views of characters. The acting was above average and the way it was directed I liked also. The actors aren't big names but again it's shown here that rather unknowns can deliver a good flick although Justin Welborn (Ben Capstone) isn't uncommon for the horror buffs, you can see him in Dance Of The Dead (2008), The Final Destination (2009), The Crazies (2010). AJ Bowen (Lewis) was seen in the cult hit The House Of The Devil (2009).

It isn't a flick for every horror fan but if you can take weird horrors with some dark comedy and nasty (gory) shots then this is for you. And for the Kleenex boys and girls, Ben Capstone goes full nude but seen on his back and Anessa Ramsey (Mya) comes out of bed with her bra on but without knickers.

Gore 2,5/5 Nudity 0,5/5 Effects 3/5 Story 4/5 Comedy 2/5
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Refreshing Horror Tale
claudio_carvalho22 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Maya Denton (Anessa Ramsey) has a love affair with her beloved lover Ben (Justin Welborn) that invites her to leave her husband Lewis (AJ Bowen) and Terminus City, meeting him in the Terminal 13 of the local station. Maya decides to go back home and finds a wounded man and his attacker in the parking area nearby Ben's house. When she arrives at home, she sees Lewis discussing with his friends Jerry (Matt Stanton) and Rod (Sahr Nguajah). When Lewis hits Jerry with a baseball bat on the head, Maya runs to the house of her next door neighbor Janice (Suehyla El-Attar) and realizes that the dwellers of her building have gone paranoid and crazy in an outburst of violence and hallucinations through the transmission and waves of television, cell phones and radios, feeling the need to kill.

"The Signal" is a refreshing horror tale that slightly uses the idea of mass control through television and cellular of "Videodrome" and "Pulse", leaving a message about the brain damage caused by the subtle message of television and excessive use of cellular. The plot is disclosed in three parts: "Transmission I: Crazy in Love", which is scary and the best one; "Transmission II: The Jealousy Monster" that is a boring dark humor comedy that does not work well in the context; and "Transmission III: Escape from Terminus" that returns to the main theme and has a good conclusion. The acting is great and the depressive cinematography gives a special climate to this good story. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): Not Available
20 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
3-part puzzle about paranoia
kosmasp10 October 2007
Although different from anything in the recent past I've seen, the structure does work a little bit against the movie. It does in the sense, that you do get three short movies, instead of one whole. That itself wouldn't be bad, if the short movies would be more coherent with one another. But as it is, the movies have a different feel (by choice), but also different quality (not by choice of the makers and I don't mean the video quality).

The middle part is the "funniest", with the other two being more disturbing. But the "mood" change isn't really fitting into the whole thing. Not to mention, that some jokes are just plain stupid. A shame, because the overall thematic (technological horror with social commentary -> TV) is a good one. But for a first-time movie it's still pretty good/impressive.
47 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Weird horror homage that may develop a cult following
STAR RATING: ***** Saturday Night **** Friday Night *** Friday Morning ** Sunday Night * Monday Morning

This bizarre little horror film that appears to have come out of nowhere seems, judging by it's style and appearance, to be a homage to the grainy 1970s horror flicks from the likes of Dario Argento or other such luminaries. Playing out in various acts (i.e. Act I: Transmission and such...) maybe the feeling isn't so much homage as one of trying to be clever and post ironic, but either way the film has the feeling of a particular type of grainy horror flick.

The driving force seems to be AJ Bowen's possessive husband, tracking his unfaithful spouse (Anessa Ramsey) after being driven mad by a twisted transmission in the tellys, leading to a whole succession of mad plot twists, until saviour (hopefully) arrives in the form of Justin Welborn's more rational bit on the side. There's plenty of blood splattered violence on display, some of it seriously pushing the boundaries, but all done with a noticeable and decent tongue in the cheek that balances it all out. The plot alone is complicated and, yes clever enough that at least two viewings would be a good idea. While this doesn't manage to be a classic of any kind, it more than makes for a rewarding enough horror flick. ***
18 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Great idea + Good moments = Bad movie
jamiewalton25 March 2012
There's a decent, if not original, idea at the heart of this movie, but the film makers are trying too hard to be arty and clever for it to ever really work.

Telling the story in three parts is a terrible idea. It's such a basic story that's being told that it feels more like a way to extend it to feature length than a worthwhile method of story telling. Part 1 is dark and brooding, part 2 is like a comedy and part 3 tries - but fails - to tie the whole thing together.

I liked part 1. It had a great atmosphere and such a feeling of dread that's it's the only part of this 'horror' movie that even approached being scary. It's also getting somewhere when it cuts to part 2, which is so tonally different that it's like a different movie. Don't get me wrong, I liked part 2, but it would have been better on it's own rather than lodged haphazardly between the far more similar parts 1 and 3.

Part 3 struggled to do something and provide a satisfying conclusion. The trouble was that this movie went from the madness caused by the signal turning people into homicidal maniacs into people who talk at random and don't know what's happening. Add the misplaced cutaways and editing tricks and it just becomes a confusing mess. The end just fizzles out and its unsatisfying, muddled and dull nature just about sums up the movie.

Having these three parts as three separate stories would have made for a better experience overall. The main story could have easily been told in Part 1, Part 2 (with a few tweaks) could have stayed the same and then Part 3 could have been a proper finale rather then the delay of something that could have happened an hour beforehand.

The best part of this movie can be found much better elsewhere. The acting was all over the place, with some pretty bad examples on show (unfortunately including a character who appears predominantly in all 3 parts)

I really did want to like this film, but I just can't do it. A nice effort, but just not a very good result.
19 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
21st Century paranoia horror at its very best...
AvidHorrorFan24 August 2007
From time to time, I stumble across movies that I know nothing about, and under normal circumstances probably wouldn't be that inclined to see. Even as an avid horror buff, low budget titles like this tend to slip through the net usually simply due to their lack of big name distribution.

Let's hope that with "The Signal" however, this doesn't happen.

Why? Because this movie is powerful, thoughtful and downright terrifying in its execution.

The movie opens with a young couple, Mya and Ben, in a tryst where it soon becomes apparent that Mya is married but very much not in love with her husband, Lewis.

Suddenly the TV is blasted on, transmitting a noisy psychedelic signal which is echoed throughout every other media form from radio to mobile phones.

Mya leaves Ben to return home to her husband only to find everyone going crazy... possibly even her own husband. Thrown into a violent and chaotic world, the story focuses on the three of them and the truth about their intertwining relationship as the city of Terminus literally goes to hell around them.

The film's three directors each take on board a different aspect of the overlapping narrative, with the running time evenly divided into 3 parts. Transmission 1 examines the initial outbreak and its effects on the main protagonists. Transmission 2 looks at the ensuing madness from the perspective of one of the afflicted (a very creepy concept which is notoriously tough to execute, but is worked to almost perfection here), and laces it with more than just a smattering of very black humour. Transmission 3 ties up the loose ends of the plot and weaves them all together in order that all main characters collide in a chaotic but much needed denouement.

Brutal, dark and completely absorbing, this grainy DV effort is always believable and therein lies its power. In a society where media has taken over every facet of our lives, technology is rife for abuse, and this movie exploits that paranoia to great dividends.

This original chiller is the American equivalent of "28 Days Later" mixed with Romero's "The Crazies" via Stephen King's novel "Cell".

Some visual and plot aspects may have suffered due to budgetary constraints, but therein also lies its charm.

"The Signal" will surprise, thrill and terrify. In short, another example of modern horror at its brutal and most thoughtful best.
189 out of 243 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too Many Cooks Spoil The Pot
SkeletonMurderer3 January 2008
It's terrible to see a movie with a first act this good because I'm absolutely certain that if David Bruckner had been given his Georgian turn as writer-director of an entire feature you'd see a critical and commercial success in The Signal. As it is what we have is a brilliant third followed by a haphazard tailspin into mediocrity where the other filmmakers treat the source material like the film they ape at the beginning, a bad Horror movie. In Bruckner's hands this material becomes the best remake of The Crazies you'll ever see, not a zombie movie, and he does it from an objective standpoint. The other two try to probe, over explain, and choose antagonists for the audience to be afraid of when the real danger is absolutely every human being in Terminus; maybe the world. We almost had a Salo of the zombie subgenre (cruel social commentary that never backs down) but like all modern Horror it retreats back to it's comfort zone of nonsensical cliché. Too bad, this almost made Horror relevant again... Almost.
29 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointing
raven_guest26 April 2015
This movie could have been amazing. The premise was one that hasn't been done to death, the first section was exciting and full of tension... and then it becomes a mess.

This film is split into 3 for some unknown reason and unfortunately this not only breaks the tension and flow, it also changes the tone entirely. Had the film continued in the vein of the first segment, it would have been brilliant, but by the halfway point I was wishing for it to end.

The cast are good, the idea is great...unfortunately the execution tailed off into a disappointing mess that I no longer cared about and wanted to end. There is something incredibly sad about so much promise coming to nothing.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
sometimes it just takes time
swayrevolt19 December 2007
After watching this movie the other night I walked out feeling like I just watched a solid horror movie. but the more I talked about it with friends and discussed it with other horror buffs, the more I realized how much I love this film!

It has all the ingredients of an instant horror classic and never gets cliché. The first and last segment feel very similar but only because the middle (funny chapter) is starkly different. This just makes for a movie that ends where the audience was first captured, which is great!

Oh and did I mention it was original, not overproduced, well-written and never leaves you thinking "ah they should have done it this way." GREAT Movie, so refreshing.
129 out of 202 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Crazy Movie!
hareyT12 May 2008
Holy crap this movie was nuts!

I am in shock because of how good it was!

I haven't seen a horror movie like this in forever! If you even think you like movies of this genre, you must go see it.

It was really well done, I'm still freaked from it.

I swear if I hear or see any white noise I'm going straight to the loony bin!

I pre-ordered it on amazon (it's not out on DVD until June 3rd) and I suggest you do the same!

Turn off the lights and grab some popcorn, prepare for a great movie!
12 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Overrated!
gaberockka7 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is being hailed as one of the greatest horror films of all time. It is not. The film makers had a great idea, but did not develop that idea, leaving way too much up to the imagination of the viewer. I like using my imagination, but this felt more like a cop-out. There's no how/why, and that is a glaring omission that ruins the movie. If they had fully developed their idea, this could have been a great flick, but as it is, it's really more frustrating then it is enjoyable. I could probably sit here and create a back-story for the signal, explaining it's origin and raison d'etre, but I'm a movie-goer, not a movie-maker, and while the premise of this movie is interesting (if not a little unoriginal - Stephen King's 'The Cell' anyone?) the movie itself is a half assed disappointment that leaves much to be desired.
27 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Sign of the Times?
frankenbenz25 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The Signal begins with a brain splattering blow to the head. But what we're watching -- a poorly made slasher reminiscent of The Last House on the Left -- isn't the movie we're supposed to be watching, its actually a movie within the movie. But pay close attention, because this shifting perspective is only the first of many gears and many perspectives to alternate throughout this low-budget, HD horror film set in the fictional city of Terminus.

When the mock-slasher's feed abruptly cuts out, it gives way to a mysterious and hypnotic type of interference. This strange signal, and its accompanying screech, is a blanket transmission pulsing through TVs, cell phones, radios and every other form of media. Watch or listen to the signal for too long and you will become a delusional and frenzied killer. While on the surface, this premise is nothing new -- it's the same type of idea behind Night of the Living Dead and dozens of other imitators -- it does qualify as being somewhat unique in that the zombies aren't really zombies...they're, living, breathing, thinking people.

The film is broken up into three segments (transmissions), each one an overlapping (not quite Rashomon-like) alternate perspective from one of three interconnected characters. The first transmission successfully borrows from the Romero inspired 28 Days Later, where every second is wrought with tension and paranoia. Gears dramatically shift as the second transmission begins and this time around we're in the black comedy, satirical vein of Shaun of the Dead. At first this dramatic shift in tone fails -- it is simply too drastic and as quickly as the first transmission had pulled us in, the second one repels us. But once we make the required adjustment, the second transmission pulls us in with its sly and incredibly bleak humor. By the time The Signal shifts into its third and final transmission, we're able to anticipate the established pattern, thus allowing the story to hit its stride. In this last segment we get a quixotic taste of being inside the heads of those afflicted by the signal, where delusions constantly pull us in and out of misleading and false perspectives. The mental struggle crystallizes when Ben (Justin Welborn) -- like someone fighting a bad acid trip -- regains control of his own mind and utilizes the signal's ill effects to his own advantage.

Like many worthy zombie films before it, the subtextual themes in The Signal are more complex than mere survival. The signal and its residual (murderous) effect works as a metaphor which comments on how we, as a 'wired' society, are coerced into living a false existence dictated by mass media. This idea is pushed to the extreme by stressing how lethal the power of the mind can be when outside ideas are subsumed, allowing us to rationalize any irrational or insane act. This metaphor isn't particularly new and some might even call it a rip-off of John Carpenter's semi-classic social satire They Live, but despite its many references to other films in this genre, The Signal does manage to establish its own voice. Even though this voice is shaky at times (possibly due to 3 directors vying for input), it does still speak intelligently enough for it to be worth listening to.

http://eattheblinds.blogspot.com/
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A refreshing looks at a tired slasher genre
mindcat3 March 2009
This film has recently surfaced on DVD, and I was fortunate enough to view it twice.

My conclusion"

Acting B+/A- Script A Cinemagraphy B/B+

I saw this film perhaps at a deeper level than some, and perhaps at a different angle than the producers.

How often have we seen perceptions go mad? Columbine comes to mind, a man murdering his entire family because he's lost his job, a jealous lover killing his beloved?

News is full of these horror stories everyday. This was a good parody upon the sad condition of the human mind as we know it.

I give a strong thumbs up for this unusual film.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very interesting movie, quite unique
gluonpaul1 November 2018
This was a very well done, well acted and well produced movie with a genuinely interesting and unique concept.

The only gripe was a weird tonal change in the middle of the movie where it was serious, then very farcical before going back to serious. I think it was intended to make you feel a bit like the people in the movie, going mad and not sure what is true and what isnt but it felt a bit jarring. Still overall this was a really decent and unusual movie and well worth watching.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Wasted Potential
soviet50412 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
'The Signal' starts off pretty promising. Before I even rented this, I had a vibe that say, the acting wouldn't be the best, and there may be moments of over the top gore.

Despite my suspicions being right, the film's first 20 minutes or so, start off pretty well. I won't rehash the plot, since I'm sure you already know what it's about.

But there are several HUGE flaws with the film...

*The over the top gore. The violence in this movie was completely unnecessary. Some of the best horror movies ever made ('Halloween' 'The Shining', etc), relied on atmosphere for their chills. The recent spate of horror flicks unfortunately doesn't do the same.

*An incredibly weak second act. The second act turned the film into a black comedy. WHY????? *Weak acting. Yeah, one doesn't really expect Oscar-caliber acting in these movies, but man...the black guy's acting was just embarrassing.

*No explanation given for The Signal's existence.

Overall, this movie would be better viewed as a freebie on TV. Even spending money on a rental would be a bad idea.
24 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This one can wrestle with the best of 'em...
mr-6423 May 2008
This is suspense and horror at its finest....

I read that some of the viewers find the second transmission to be funny. Not for me, it was madness all over. This movie absorbed me more then any of the latest "zombie" installations. Especially interesting is the fact that everyone gets affected by the signal. Each in his own way (and that's probably what some consider funny). It is not the typical survivors versus evil thing. Everyone fights against his own paranoia here, snapping in and out of reality.

Plenty of gore but they do not go over the top with it. Pacing is good, camera is good (no shaky stuff here) and i liked the minimalistic distortion effects.

It might be a bit confusing for some to watch, because the storytelling is not straight forward. Lots of jumps between timelines and hallucinations from the protagonists, i loved it.

It's like a LSD trip gone wrong...

All three directors are on my watchlist now, thanks for this nice piece of work. Any horror buff should try it, this is some solid stuff.

Gimme more !!!
51 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A sadistic, rambling romp of gratuitous violence
pale_pixie25 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The pest control man who repeatedly sprays poison in peoples' faces, bashes them with objects, has lost touch with reality and people shambling like zombies.

That sums it up. If that's what your looking for, then put your mind in "Park" and get ready for 1 1/2 hours of utter rubbish.

I'm not even sure what the director set out to accomplish as the end result is so scrambled, convoluted and irksome that it is almost an insult to the viewer's time invested in sitting and waiting for some sense to appear. There won't be any resolutions. It rambles to the very end.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
entertaining horror comedy
Buddy-5115 November 2008
"The Signal" starts off like a straightforward horror film on the order of "Night of the Living Dead" or "28 Days Later," but about a third of the way through, it turns into a tongue-in-cheek parody of the whole apocalyptic-thriller genre.

It's New Year's Eve, and a mysterious, hypnotic signal is being broadcast on TVs and radios across the planet, resulting in a mass psychosis that turns ordinary, average citizens into cold-blooded killers.

This is a fun, good-natured spoof that is as creepy as it is amusing, at least up to a point. That point is passed a few times when the movie turns a little more gruesome and sadistic than it really needs to be. Yet, despite having to work with an extremely low budget, directors David Bruckner, Jacob Gentry and Dan Bush do an effective job creating a post-apocalyptic atmosphere, while the script, co-written by all three men, employs a canny combination of flashbacks and fantasy sequences as part of the narrative.

A spirited and unnerving parable about urban paranoia, "The Signal" should delight fans of offbeat horror.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nothing but extremely small-scale repetitive violence that takes "Senseless" to a whole new level
Navaros2 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The Signal can be summed up thusly in one sentence: A few men and a couple of women keep torturing and killing each other multiple times for 1 hour and 40 minutes. It is important to take special note that that it is *the same* few men and couple of women torturing and killing each other multiple times. No one stays dead in The Signal. Although The Signal shows the same 5 actors/characters die multiple times in the movie, they just keep coming back scene after scene to "kill each other" again. This renders all the violence and "kills" in the movie utterly meaningless. Senseless violence in the truest sense of the word.

Don't get me wrong, I love a good violent movie as much as the next person. Violence in movies can be very entertaining, and is great when it is done-well. The problem with The Signal is not the violence in and of itself, but rather that that is *all* that there is to the movie. The problem is also the violence in The Signal makes no sense whatsoever, and the violence in The Signal is merely *the same* actors/characters bludgeoning each other to death in repetitive ways over and over again. For this reason the violence in The Signal isn't even fun on a mindless entertainment level, because even mindless entertainment must have *some* small semblance of intelligence to be fun (Ie: The same actors/characters don't keep getting up after being killed and killing each other again multiple times).

A man in The Signal who takes a hammer blow directly to the back of the head ends up being fine, completely aware of his surroundings and able to run around like Superman and kill other people all night long. Just as much so even after he takes multiple gunshots.

A main character's head is gruesomely bashed in beyond recognition, on-screen, yet a minute or two later he is standing up with his head "magically" intact again with no explanation at all (because there is no possible way to even *attempt* to explain such absolute drivel!). By the point in the movie where this happens, it is probably already the 4th or 5th time where the two very same main actors/characters had "killed each other" in the movie. After this point in the movie, the same two actors continue to "kill each other" a couple of dozen more times for the next 40 minutes until the movie is over.

In the first half hour a character in The Signal claims the streets are full of chaos & anarchy, then the movie shows 5 seconds worth of quick cuts of a few people stumbling around the streets. For the entire rest of the movie, the streets are completely empty. The *only people* seen in the movie are the 3 actors and 2 actresses who they hired to kill each other multiple times for 1 hour and 40 minutes.

Many have pointed out that the vehicle a main character drives in The Signal "magically" changes to a *completely different* vehicle from one shot to the next.

There is a *good reason* why The Signal disappeared out of all theatres in less than a week and you've *probably* never even heard of it until stumbling upon the title by happenstance. That reason is because The Signal is an asinine movie that is unfit for theatrical release, and unfit for the cost of a DVD rental also. That it even *exists* as a movie is an embarrassment to the intelligence of mankind as a lifeform.

The first 3 minutes of The Signal set the bar very low already (and establishes that the movie is going to make no sense) by having no relation whatsoever to the rest of the movie. Just a generic scene of some women being chased through the woods and locked up in a cabin. In addition to being absolutely irrelevant to the movie, this scene has no resolution and no point.

I never thought I'd see a movie worse than a Uwe Boll movie, but The Signal *is*. Uwe Boll's movies are Oscar-worthy masterpieces *when compared* to The Signal.

A lot of people say that The Signal rips off Stephen King's "The Cell". All I can say is I darn sure hope not! Because if when The Cell movie comes out if it is anywhere near as bad as The Signal, it will be another blight against the intelligence of mankind, not to mention agonizing to watch.

The origin of "the signal" in the movie is never explained. The wide effect of the signal on the city or planet are never shown. The movie spends 100% of it's time following the same 5 actors through small apartments, hallways, and a few empty streets. That's it. The premise of The Signal sounds like you are getting an epic movie, but *really* the only thing you get from The Signal is *extremely* small-scale nonsense. There *might as well* only be 5 people on the planet during the course of the movie The Signal, because anyone else who may be present on the planet is not shown or discussed at all in the movie.

Note: I apologize for this review being fairly repetitive, but it was the only reasonable way to fully describe the content of The Signal, as well as give you a feel of what watching the movie will be like. If you found this review boring and repetitive, you will probably find watching the The Signal movie to be 50x more boring and repetitive.

The Signal is quite possibly the most ridiculous, asinine, nonsensical movie of all-time. But *not* in a good way. I would give The Signal a 0/10, but unfortunately IMDb forces me to give it a 1/10.
26 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
beauty in blood
fgoworderup11 March 2008
Independent films have always been enjoyable to watch for me because they normally show the real side of things, but, that not being the point of emphasis in The Signal (hah) I was nervous about seeing it, especially because I wasn't sure about the three different genres mixed. But man, was I surprised! The three genres of: Section 1: Horror. Section 2: Dark Comedy. Section 3: Science Fictions, were done by three different directors not making contact with one another after they had written the script and began filming. None the less, with the fantastic and willing cast, and the offset music that plays once in a while, these three men who wrote and directed, and I believe one helped produce, create a masterpiece that will be a cult legend forever as well as a movie everyone should see. BOTTOM LINE: The smoothness of three completely different genres surprises and amazes to bring one of the most enjoyable and momentous time at the movies this year.
66 out of 110 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not just a horror film
PhilMcK62323 May 2008
The Signal is a horror film, yes. But it offers much, much more. It could pass as a dark comedy, or even a love story. That's one of the things I like about this film, it has so much to offer. You're not just subjected to one single genre like in so many other horror flicks. Here you get the best of all worlds and all are done very well. I defiantly didn't expect to laugh during this film, but I did, all while being freaked out by the blood and suspense, and being touched by the tender love story. What a pleasant surprise and a nice break from the typical horror films.

One of the best films I've seen all year.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Three Cooks In The Kitchen Spoil The Stew
Patriotlad@aol.com16 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
For Father's Day, my children suggested that we have a nice family dinner and then screen a movie on DVD -- my choice. Unfortunately, my choice was to rent this barking dog of a film. Some of the reviews here gave me the idea that this might be an original, "technocreepy" kind of flick. Brothers and sisters !?! Can I get an "Amen"? No ?? Here's why. "The Signal" is, hands down, the absolute worst film that I've seen in the last twenty-five years. Not since being forced ( by an ex-girl friend ) to sit through "The Model Shop," have I been this repulsed by a so-called entertainment.

This film is flat-out terrible in every important regard. The acting, if there was any, is wooden. We're talking mahogany wooden here.

The blood is plentiful beyond any demand for it, every 'crazy' scene was the same in context, the three fellows who made this barking dog did NOTHING at all original. If you are working on a budget that is so slender you have to borrow your friends' apartments, at least pick some locations where there's enough room to turn around.

This story-line is 100 % nihilistic. There is no redemption for these characters' suffering. That's a plot failure. The best-looking actress in "The Signal" is tortured mercilessly for no apparent reason. That's a moral failure which rests on the three co-creators.

These fellows have committed a crime against humanity itself in the making of this cinematic fiction: the idea of a corrupt signal making people go crazy is hardly new, but they took that interesting premise and built a slaughter-house on it. Shame on them for doing so.

The three fellows who made this film -- I dare not call them gentlemen in any sense of that term -- reveal only one thing to us who are their audience and their market. They have not one ounce of compassion in the text of their story-telling, not one ounce of humanity, and not so much as ONE original thought about how to make a meaningful fiction. What a shameful waste of their time and my money.

So, yes, and "hell yes!!" Shame on all three of them. The foundation for the story -- the appearance of a rogue pattern of interference -- was apparently borrowed or maybe pirated from "Pulse". The cheating wife and her idiot husband was borrowed from somewhere else, like maybe any of a thousand TV movies one can see free on Oxygen or Lifetime.

And as I said, the most interesting character appears in Part Two only, and is then scripted to be brutally assaulted, tortured, and then dispatched. Sickening and vile and pointless.

They could have driven this film almost anywhere, because it is indeed, a character-driven vehicle. They chose to drive it into a dumpster ( quite literally ), and with any luck that is where all of the known DVD copies of "The Signal" will inevitably reside. And not a moment too soon, in my opinion.
23 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I have the crazy!
choul12 May 2008
OK, if you have just watched this and are a little confused, watch it again. It's really not confusing, it's just extremely thought provoking. This film requires the viewers have a brain, and use it while watching. In fact, I haven't had a film leave me thinking like this in recent memory! The 3 different transmissions in the movie keep you on your toes and make this movie so freakin' cool!!! The story is so creative that only pure genius could've written it. Kudos to all involved in this film, you've created something great. This movie goes on my all time favorites and I will be adding it to my extensive DVD collection. Thanks for such an entertaining and brilliant film!
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed