"The Veil" Genesis (TV Episode 1958) Poster

(TV Mini Series)

(1958)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
One Of The Lesser Tales From Behind The Veil
Witchfinder-General-6666 October 2008
As an avid lover of Classic Horror, "The Veil", a 1958 TV series of 10 episodes, caught my immediate interest when I stumbled upon it, mainly since this highly entertaining show was hosted by none other than the great Boris Karloff. A mysterious story about the 'unexplainable, which lies behind the veil' is narrated in each episode. The entire show is entertaining, but it must be said that the episodes do differ in quality quite a bit. This sixth episode, "Genesis", is one of the lesser episodes, or, more precisely, along with "The Return Of Madame Vernoy", my least favorite in the show. Not that it was not entertaining - it is. There is a certain tone of morality throughout the show, however, and this is strongest in this episode. The morality is entertaining in other episodes, but it goes a little far here. Two brothers, the older a typical 'good boy' who stayed at home to take care of the farm, the younger a typical 'good-for-nothing' who left home to get to know the world, are fighting over the will of their dying father... The film takes over the biblical topic of Jacob and Esau, with a paranormal touch. Once again, Karloff himself has a small role. As stated above, this is one of the lesser episodes to the show. This is is not to say that it is not worthwhile, however. The episode is entertaining and, as far as I am considered, Karloff's mere presence makes anything worthwhile. Furthermore it will only cost some 25 minutes of your time.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Veil: Genesis
Scarecrow-8820 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Two brothers fighting over their father's farm property is the gist of this episode of "The Veil" called "Genesis", with a little *supernatural guidance* determining the fate of all involved, including where the matriarch of the Haney family, Emma (Katherine Squire), will have to live. James Haney (Peter Miller) is a no-good scoundrel who stole his father's money, returning home hoping to seize upon more if papaw passes away. John Jr. (Lee Farr), who has dutifully carried on attending to the farm, loathes his brother, and will fight James if he attempts to get his hands on any more. "Dueling wills" were made by the deceased and the more recently dated one was written out of anger, but leaves the real property to James as long as Emma is taken care of. All James cares about is selling the farm, moving Emma to a rest home, and pocketing the cash, while John Jr. plans to contest the will, hiring family attorney, Jonas Atterbury (Karloff) to help him, hoping to challenge the clause that their mother will not be treated as their father so desired. A ghostly visit to John Jr, when the case seems to be on the verge of his defeat, by paw might just interfere with James' goals. Mostly a credible story about greed and how it can tear a family apart, with a little of the supernatural thrown in for good measure. Karloff is likable old family friend who is rightfully abhorred at James' plans for the property at his disposal, agreeing to represent John Jr. so that Emma can remain at the place she has always called home. While the outcome is predictable, how it comes to pass thanks to a family bible in the attic, hinted at by the possible apparition of the dead father to John Jr, is rather an interesting idea played to dramatic effect. Not the most memorable of the short series, but I think it has a decent story to tell, and you can feel the intensity of the situation as it plays out between two brothers who couldn't be more different and have hostility for one another.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's all biblical.
mark.waltz9 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The story of Jacob and Esau is an excellent analogy of betrayal and in this modern take on the story, two brothers find themselves estranged due to the schemes of the younger brother to cheat the elder out of his inheritance. Boris Karloff hosts and plays the family solicitor who becomes convinced that the older brother has a case. Ghostly visits from the deceased father adds to the suspicions. Utilizing the biblical story is an ingenious metaphor with ethics and the power of forgiveness as interesting themes. Great performances by Kathleen Squire as the mother and Peter Miller and Lee Farr as the sons along with Karloff make this one of the more interesting episodes of "The Veil".
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I just don't understand what gets into you!
classicsoncall8 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
There's something decidedly troubling about this episode. Why wouldn't the senior John Haney (Charles Meredith) have left his estate to wife Emma (Katherine Squire) with his favored son as an alternate in case Emma pre-deceased him? That would have been more logical, but sometimes these programs weren't based on logic. So here we have a slightly different take on the Bible story of Esau and Jacob. Gone ten years from the family homestead, younger brother Jamie (Peter Miller) returns with the news of his father's impending death. He smugly asserts that he's inherited the family farm based on a will his father wrote some time after the father had a falling out with older son John, Jr. (Lee Farr). The sons have a physical altercation, the case goes to court, and it appears that Jamie's will is the one that will be honored. The supernatural aspect of this program occurs when the ghost of senior Haney appears to John with the cryptic message 'Genesis 27'. Searching the attic for the deceased farmer's personal Bible, the sons discover yet another updated will that reverses Jamies's version, and gives the farm to John so it can be kept in the family. All's well that ends well with this episode, except to explain how John Jr. Was able to communicate with his dead father.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A solid and effective episode
Woodyanders11 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Slick no-count opportunist James Haney (a perfectly smug portrayal by Peter Miller) and his more decent morally upright older brother John Haney Jr. (well played by Lee Farr) fiercely clash with each other over their father's will. Director George Waggner and writer Sidney Morse ably craft a nice little morality play on loyalty, ambition, and selfishness that never degenerates into preachy mush. The intense and snappy sparring scenes between the two quarreling siblings pack a strong emotional punch while the mild supernatural element (John sees an apparition of his deceased dad) is treated with the show's trademark restraint and intelligence. Miller and Farr both do excellent work in the lead roles. Boris Karloff likewise impresses in a sizable supporting part as shrewd family lawyer Jonas Atterbury, Katherine Squire is fine as the brothers' worn-out mother Emma, and veteran character actor Morris Ankrum has a neat small role as a no-nonsense judge. Howard Shwartz's sharp black and white cinematography and Leon Klatzkin's spare, moody score bother further enhance the overall sturdy quality of this sound and satisfying episode.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Childish Script
Hitchcoc5 November 2016
I am generally forgiving of weakness in low budget efforts like "The Veil." But this episode could have been written by a child in Mrs. Johnson's fourth grade class. First of all, the whole legal process is so ridiculously presented. Two estranged brothers pull wills written by their recently deceased father. Each has a different date on it, the "bad" brother having the most recent (they are written on pieces of paper about the size of a grocery list). They instantly begin living their lives based on the statements made in these two will. The hard working older brother is asked to leave "my" house. The mother is a piece of work. She is stupid and impulsive and willing to live by these conditions. Soon, they find themselves in court, as the will is contested. Shouldn't this have been done before people got thrown out and the old lady sent to an old folks home? Of course, there soon is ghostly intervention. Most of these episodes seem to hinge on dead people coming back or appearing in some form. Then there is the Biblical element. What were the old guys motivations. If he forgave the older son after their argument, why not just give him the damned will. He knew how ill he was. Anyway, this episode is not worth the paper it is printed on.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Quite good.
planktonrules16 February 2014
The episodes of "The Veil" all claimed that these stories of the supernatural were 100% true. While I thoroughly doubt that, I have enjoyed watching these shows. I noticed that one reviewer thought this one was below average, but I liked it quite a bit.

An old man is dying. His youngest son Jamie disappeared a decade ago and has returned just to see if the old man will leave him something. Nice guy, huh? The older brother, Johnny, is a guy you feel sorry for--he's stayed and been loyal to the tyrant-like father. You feel even more sorry for him when his father died and Jamie presents a will that leaves everything to him. Jamie, not being a bastion of decency, plans on selling the farm, dumping his mother in an old folks home and keeping the rest of the money. Ultimately, this case ends up in court. However, here's where the supernatural part comes--Johnny sees his father--as if he's alive! And, the dead guy tells him to look at Genesis 27--the story of Jacob and Esau. While there are a lot of similarities to what has now taken place between Jamie and Johnny, there might just be more to it and Johnny needs to get a hold of the family Bible. What's next? Well, see it for yourself. This and the other episodes of the series are available for free download at archive.org and are well worth your time.

By the way, like in all but one of the other episodes, the host, Boris Karloff, not only provides the introduction and epilogue but plays one of the central characters--in this case, Johnny's lawyer.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Routinely-plotted
Leofwine_draca2 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
GENESIS is a Biblically-themed VEIL episode that reminded me of Steinbeck novel. The subject matter involves farming brothers battling over an estate following the death of their father. Karloff plays the genial lawyer, while the story that transpires is strictly routine, despite a handful of spookier moments.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
War between brothers
searchanddestroy-19 October 2022
Not the best of the whole series. Maybe because this scheme brings nothing new, especially the ending is not that surprising. But it is short and entertaining enough to justify that you watch it. After all, what's twenty six minutes in your life? Dialogues are sharp, screenwriting made by professional people, and for such a short length for a story, it is easy to fill it up. Something essential is missing though, to put this episode at the scale of the other ones. Maybe it should have been presented in another TV show, anthology series. It is more a drama than anything else. It doesn't leaves door opened for eerie elemnts.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
improvisations
Kirpianuscus2 October 2022
It seems an episode dominated by improvisation. Obvious good ingredients - the rivalry of brothers, the story from Genesis 27 , the mother accepting, for peace of her sons a not so reasonable compromise. But the duel of the two wills works bad. And the final solution sounds real unrealistic, destroying a reasonable premise.

But , sure, the presence of Boris Karloff saves a part of story and the end can be accepted by optimistic/ idealistic viewers. But you know - the episode deserves a better story. In its absence , all is reduced at a sort of improvisations, solutions of last moment, nice but unconvincing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed