(TV Series)

(1982)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Entertaining but amazingly alarmist.
planktonrules4 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This episode of "Quincy" seems to be extremely alarmist and I wonder how much it might have actually hurt medical research. While it brings up a potential hazard of bio-research, it makes the point with little subtlety and with LOTS of scare tactics.

The show begins with a dying woman sneaking out of the oncology ward at the hospital. Soon, she is attacked by a nasty hobo (the stabbing and stealing kind--not the windshield washing kind) and she falls down dead! It seems she was too sick from her illness and the exertion hastened her death. However, what folks don't know is that her body also has a deadly form of pneumonia--one that is the result of some odd genetically altered drug being tested on her. But, since folks DON'T know about the illness, the doctor doing the trial goes on to some brief fame, as the treatment appears to reduce the size of cancerous tumors. BUT, it also makes the folks vectors for this deadly pneumonia--and soon folks start dying. And, it's up to Quincy to save the day.

It is entertaining. But, the drug company is a one-dimensional house of evil and the genetically altered drug a horrible killer--which all seems too alarmist and poorly written to me. Maybe you'll think otherwise--I just thought it seemed a bit irresponsible.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Average Quincy.
poolandrews10 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Quincy M.E.: Science for Sale starts as terminal cancer patient Cynthia Oliver (Kate Lardner) gets out of bed & walks out of the hospital where she has been receiving a cutting edge genetically created treatment for her cancer. Cynthia's cancer was too far advanced & she dies near the hospital though, she ends up on L.A. coroner Quincy's (Jack Klugman) autopsy table & he sees nothing suspicious but learns about her revolutionary treatment developed by scientist Dr. Paul Lynn (Lane Smith). Then the body of a derelict is brought in who died from a virus Quincy cannot identify, shortly after another body that ends up on Quincy's autopsy table shows the same virus. The factor that links the two bodies together is Cynthia Oliver & by messing around with genetics Dr. Lynn has created a new type of killer virus...

Episode 7 from season 8 this Quincy story was directed by Ray Danton & is an OK episode although once again it's moral & social message gets in the way of any sort of crime solving. In Science for Sale the makers of Quincy decided to tackle the issue of genetic engineering & it's pitfalls, yeah it was a great idea to make a Quincy episode about genetic engineering while it was a relatively new process & end up with the scientists involved making a killer virus & the notion they were only in it to make money. I mean that was really going to reassure the public wasn't it? Having said that to be fair to it this episode does say that the cancer treatment had promise & had worked to some extent, to be honest I don't know why Quincy has gone down this path where every episode so far during season 8 except Sleeping Dogs is nothing more than a 60 odd minute prick to the audiences moral sub conscious & nothing much else. Again Quincy barely features in this & apart from figuring out that the virus was made by Dr. Lynn doesn't do anything, dull, dull, dull.

This one has dated pretty badly, genetic science has come a long way since this so this which originally aired in 1982 really isn't relative or necessary in 2007. I don't know about anyone else but I think Lane Smith as Dr. Lynn puts in one of the worst guest performances I've ever seen in a Quincy episode. Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954) star Julie Adams makes her third guest appearance on Quincy in which she has played different character's in each.

Science for sale is yet more dated moralistic nonsense that doesn't even try to put a balanced argument across, this is an OK episode but nothing special & I think I'm being generous by saying that.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Odd episode featuring experimental treatment debate
rayoflite2417 January 2016
Science for Sale begins with a terminal cancer patient, Cindy Oliver (Kate Lardner), receiving an experimental genetically engineered treatment in the hospital and then wandering out and dying on the street. When others that she came into contact with also start falling ill and dying, Quincy (Jack Klugman) conducts the autopsies and makes the connection that a deadly virus has been created along with the treatment. When he learns that the experimental treatment has also been administered to others in a clinical trial, he implores them and the treating doctor, Paul Lynn (Lane Smith), to quarantine them so that others with weak immune systems are not infected and killed.

This is a pretty odd episode that addresses the potentially dangerous consequences and side effects of experimental genetic engineering treatments. There is no crime or mystery featured and Quincy takes a backseat throughout most of the story to Dr. Lynn who is put in the spotlight but really is not charismatic or interesting enough to carry the episode. Between that and the fact that there has been significant advances in the field since this episode first aired, it just comes across as very outdated. On a lighter note, I did enjoy the subplot of Dr. Asten (John S. Ragin) investing his savings into a speculative stock which didn't pan out and caused him to lose a chunk of money. While this was pretty out of character for the cautious doctor who would have more likely gone with an established and reliable stock that produced modest gains, it was still pretty amusing to watch.

Overall I would characterize this as a below average Quincy episode which does not feature a crime or an investigation but has a lot of debating over the welfare of patients and medical jargon being thrown around. This is not the worst of Season 8, but still not a good one either and I can't recommend.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed