"Monk" Mr. Monk Gets Fired (TV Episode 2004) Poster

(TV Series)

(2004)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Great Episode, but i think there were two crimes going on
snickzella14 October 2022
I'm not going to talk about the case that monk solves in this, but rather, the stuff having to do with the commissioner. Because i think he's guilty of something else. He dislikes Monk with a passion because of what happened to a friend of his, and so he fires him, as a way to get back at Monk. We don't know what his friend did, other than his police officer friend, was incriminating someone else. What if it was a joint conspiracy, because not only is the commissioner mentally and emotionally ill-equipped to be doing this, job, but something tells me, that whatever crime him and his officer friend committed, it was together, only he got off without being indicted or suspected. All in all this episode is good.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The firing of Mr Monk
TheLittleSongbird25 July 2017
'Monk' has always been one of my most watched shows when needing comfort, to relax after a hard day, a good laugh or a way to spend a lazy weekend.

Up to this point of Season 3, "Mr Monk Gets Fired" is the best. With that being said, the previous three episodes are still enjoyable, just not up to "best of 'Monk'" standards, a distinction that "Mr Monk Gets Fired" nearly hits. Would have loved to have seen more of Sharona, whose most significant contribution is tackling the commissioner on Monk's odds, and outside of the commissioner, Karen and Dr Kroger the supporting characters are not really all that memorable.

There is still nonetheless a huge amount to enjoy. The mystery is a fun and intriguing one, at times a surprisingly elaborate one, with a clever ending that avoids being confusing or silly. Even better are the character moments, one really feels sorry for Monk despite such a big error (an error though that would have been job costing anyway without back-up, but one really does get more of a sense that he was fired for personal reasons rather than the error).

Loved Karen's contribution, bringing some welcome levity and one really enjoys the relationship between her and Stottlemeyer, and that it actually gave Stottlemeyer more to do (after having a few episodes where he was underused), showing a lot of love, frustration, friendship, loyalty, desire and wanting to help Monk and solve the case within professional limits. Disher is amusing and never comes over as an idiot.

One of the best things about 'Monk' has always been the acting of Tony Shalhoub in the title role. It was essential for him to work and be the glue of the show, and Shalhoub not only is that but also at his very best he IS the show. Have always loved the balance of the humour, which is often hilarious, and pathos, which is sincere and touching. It is remarkable here that right from the first episode to when the show ended that one likes him straight away, even with his quirks and deficiencies that could easily have been overplayed, and also that he is better developed than most titular characters of other shows at this particular stage. Who can't help love Monk's brilliant mind too?

Bitty Schram and Jason Gray-Stanford are good, she sharp and no-nonsense but sympathetic, and he appealing and amusing without being buffoonish. Ted Levine fares best of the regulars, staying true to Stottlemeyer's usual traits while adding some more layers. Glenne Headley, Saverio Guerra and Stanley Kamel are also good, the rest of the cast are on the forgettable side but competent.

It's not just the cast though. Another star is the writing, which is also essential to whether the show would be successful or not and succeed it does here. The mix of hilarious wry humour, lovable quirkiness and tender easy-to-relate-to drama is delicately done mostly deft.

Visually, the episode is shot in a slick and stylish way, and the music is both understated and quirky. While there is a preference for the theme music for Season 1, Randy Newman's "It's a Jungle Out There" has grown on me overtime, found it annoying at first but appreciate its meaning and what it's trying to say much more now.

All in all, great episode if not quite one of the best. 9/10 Bethany Cox
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Mugging for the Camera
Hitchcoc11 March 2020
There are two strains here. One has to do with the murder and dismemberment of a beautiful young woman. The other is an overzealous police commissioner who dislikes Adrian and fires him from his consultant work. Sharona has to go back to work and Monk goes around, depressed and lost. But the case plays out nicely.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Commish
safenoe24 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Here the abrasive Police Commissioner butts head with the Captain, Monk and the rest of the division. The Commish has it in for Monk, but my favorite Arab-American TV detective maintains his integrity. I wonder if the Commish was biased towards Monk's nationality post 9/11? Stanley Kamel as always adds an extra dimension to every episode through his role as Dr Kroger. One hilarious moment was when Dr Kroger coaches Monk in his upcoming job interview to be a fact-checker.
1 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Makes no sense
jezfernandez14 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
So the killer needed the Commissioner's toupe, because it was made from the hair of the murder victim. And...? The victim sold her hair a month before she was murdered in the killer's garage. So how does the toupe in any way implicate the killer, especially since they found no trace evidence anywhere at the alleged crimes scene? Even if they could source DNA from it, there is zero link to the actual murder.

The show is always funny, but the plots often make little sense.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Plot makes no sense
Hughmanity22 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I love Monk as a show but did they not even think about this plot for one minute? It makes no sense at all. The killer admits from the start that he knew the victim. He tells Captain Stottlemeyer that, "we had a fight and she left" meaning she was in his home. Later, the case seems to hinge on them finding DNA in the garage. Why wouldn't the killer just say, "yeah so? I've already said she was here. She's been in the garage getting out of my car. If you find DNA it means nothing other than she was here which I've already admitted to." Maybe if they found blood they could say violence had occurred but Monk actually says even a strand of hair would do it, which makes no sense.

Later they link the commissioner's toupe to the victim. Again, so what? It proves she sold her hair to a wig maker, that's it. They still haven't found her DNA in the garage and even if they did, that still proves nothing!

I get that this show is largely a comedy but typically they at least get the plot basics right. It seems odd that nobody thought about this one long enough to realize how little sense it makes.

Also that the Captain's wife is filming an all-access documentary without the Commissioner's knowledge, and then even once he finds out he doesn't stop it but rather is openly berating everyone in front of the camera? Again I understand it's a vehicle for the jokes but they really kind of jumped the shark on this one.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed