"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" Death Sentence (TV Episode 1958) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"There's no statute of limitations on murder, buddy boy."
classicsoncall23 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Even though this story was building up to something nefarious, I thought the ending was somewhat of a cop-out. Granted, Norman Frayne (James Best) didn't have a lot of options dealing with his old buddy Al Revnel (Steve Brodie), but suicide is too much of a final outcome to get a measure of revenge. The sleazy Al got pinched for violating his parole, but that couldn't have been much of a comfort for the dead guy. The weird thing about the ending was how Norman rigged the front car in his garage to explode instead of the one behind it that he and Al drove up in. I guess either way Norman would have been on the hook one way or another if it was Al who got blown away.

I always liked James Best as a character actor. My first look at him was when I was watching the Twilight Zone as a kid with my Dad. He made an impression on me in the episode "The Last Rites of Jeff Myrtlebank". Every now and then he got a chance at a lead role, and for a real hoot, you should catch him in 1959's "The Killer Shrews". You'll never be the same again.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pretty good episode but confusing ending?
glitterrose1 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Norman's a man that has a lot on his mind. His mind is pretty much his own worst enemy. He worries a lot and he's got very low self esteem. And his troubles don't get any better once somebody from his past shows up and blackmails him and worms his way into the house.

I thought James Best did a great job with his role and overall I didn't have an issue with Steve Brodie and the lady playing Norman's wife. There's two tidbits I want to point out. One makes me laugh and the other confuses me.

I'll start with the funny item and I'm not really sure who to put the blame on for this one. Bit of backstory: Norman's character has his back against the wall and he feels like death is the only way out of this mess. He buys explosives and blows himself up in his car. Paula (Norman's wife) is on the phone when the car explodes. I don't know about y'all but I think that phone would drop out of my hands and I'd scream if I heard an explosion. Take notice of the length of time it takes Paula to react.

The thing that confuses me is if Paula did have an affair going on with Steve Brodie's character (Al). Another character warned Norman that Al goes home to eat lunch while Paula's at home. Paula was planning on taking a trip and Norman accused her of going off with Al. Paula denies it and she sounded believable as she tells who is going on this trip. It's the ending that throws everything for a loop for me. Norman's already dead and Al's being taken back in for breaking parole. Paula asks to see Al one last time and she breaks down over Norman's death. The scene of her breaking down was a bit over the top (as if she had to go overboard crying over her dead husband that she was cheating on). So that ending is kinda confusing for me. Other than that, it was a very entertaining episode.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An interesting story idea that lacks the Hitchocockian twist.
planktonrules1 April 2021
"Death Sentence" is a rather ordinary episode of "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" because although it has a nice story, it lacks irony and the usual great twist.

When the story begins, Norman is a successful business man who seems to have a pretty good life. However, an unexpected old friend arrives fresh from prison and he plans on putting the bite on Norman. You soon learn that the two men were partners in crime long ago and the friend was caught and sent to prison...and now that he's been paroled, he informs Norman that he wants to be taken care of OR ELSE he'll tell authorities what really happened long ago...sending Norman to prison. So he has little choice but to give in to this blackmail and during this time, Norman ignores his loving wife and it puts a stain on the marriage.

While an interesting story idea, the writer didn't seem to know what to do with it and the ending was just okay and nothing more.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A nice looking lady is worth living for
bnelso-2379317 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This episode is tremendously well acted by James Best and the lady Katherine Bard as his wife. But suicide is no solution ever especially when there are beautiful ladies worth living for. The lead character should not had been written to kill himself and lose his beautiful and wonderful wife. A very tough and ultimately wrongheaded ep to get through . Women are more than worth staying alive for, fellas.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Murderous love
TheLittleSongbird14 February 2023
Paul Henreid was the second most prolific director for 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents', the most being Robert Stevens. None of the regular directors for the series were consistent, with pretty much all of them having a mix of very good and more and not particularly good episodes. As well as the second most prolific director, Henreid was also one of the more variable in terms of episode quality. As far as his previous episodes go, there were winners like "Last Request" and "A Little Sleep" but also disappointments like "Silent Witness" and "Enough Rope for Two".

"Death Sentence" unfortunately is closer to being one of the disappointments, though Henreid did do worse, including the aforementioned two. It is not an awful episode by all means, although as said Henreid's 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' output was very hit and miss even his weakest entries were better than most of the other prolific directors at their worst (Stevens and Herschel Daugherty for examples). Certainly had no issues with the acting, which is the main compensation, the episode just felt rather ordinary and bland.

There are good things about "Death Sentence". Both leads are very good, particularly James Best in a performance that really unnerves. Katharine Bard is alluring. Hitchcock's bookending has some nice amusing drollness.

It looks quite good visually, with some nice moody photography. The theme music for the series is delightfully macabre as expected. It starts off quite well.

Unfortunately, "Death Sentence" was an example of a good idea that felt under-cooked in the execution. The story is lacking in suspense in a story that was crying out for it and had a running out of ideas feel later on. Not just in the saggy pacing but also when the story seemed to get thinner rather than more eventful, which made the episode feel very bland and routine. There are far more implausible episodes in the series, including some of Henreid's other episodes (i.e. "Silent Witness"), but the character motivations and decisions felt really vague and not delved into enough so there was some confusion here and there too.

Furthermore, there is a sudden decision at the end that is far too sudden and out of nowhere, and didn't make sense to me considering everything that comes beforehand. It also makes the character in question come over as stupid. Henreid's direction generally is uninspired and the episode would have benefitted from a tighter pace, more surprises and dialogue that had more edge and less over heated melodrama.

Overall, watchable but also wasn't that crazy about it. 5/10.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The death of innocence
kapelusznik1826 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** The Master-Alfred Hitchcock-really outdoes himself here with a totally unexpected ending to the bad guy in the episode smoothie blackmailer Al Revnel,Steve Brodie, getting everything that's coming to him in spades when his victim real estate agent Norman Frayne, James Best, turns the tables on him. It was Frayne who was involved in a robbery that his partner Renvel ended up shooting to death the night watchman that Frayne chickened out to do. Spending 12 only years in the can-jail-for 1st degree murder-He must have had a real sharp lawyer-Revnel is back on the street to get Frayne to pay him back-a cool $50,000.00-for the lost time and income he spend all those years behind bars.

At first Frayne plays along with Revnel letting him live in his house together with Frayne's totally clueless wife Paula,Katharine Bard, telling her that Revnel is an old army buddy of his and even giving him a monthly allowance of $800.00 to mostly gamble with. It's later when Renvel gets a little too cute with Paula and asks for more money to play the horses with that Frayne finally decides to put his foot down. That by him planting a bomb in his car-That Revnel has to keys too- and when he starts the car up blow the creep to kingdom come.

***SPOILERS*** The ending has the law abiding Frayne have a sudden change of heart and eventually do the right thing. Not in doing in that dirty blackmailer Renvel by explosive but by the law in exposing his blackmail scheme as well. That by punishing himself not just for being involved in a robbery/murder together with Renvel 12 years ago but by keeping that not only from the police but from his wife Paula who believed and trusted in him.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Motivations Missing
Hitchcoc5 July 2013
I guess when one is driven by despair, one can go to the most ridiculous extremes. This is a story about love, even though it is not love in a demonstrative way, but the kind of love people have who have gotten used to each other. Enter the other element, the young, romantic manipulator. We are led to believe that our hero has finally had enough, and while what he is doing is beyond the pale, he is at least doing something. Of course, Hitchcock's writers know that the story is just too easy. Revenge is what this is all about, so we need a more satisfactory ending. Performances are quite dramatic. I just couldn't get beyond the lack of choices that the protagonist investigates. Oh well! It's a half hour and it certainly is interesting.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Better for Laughs
dballtwo6 February 2021
When a writer is bogged down with a drama that just won't go, he's far better off trying it out as a comedy. The unworkable premises piled up to ridiculous heights in "Death Sentence" make a pretty good example. Hangdog protagonist James Best is haunted by an unhappy childhood, the legacy of a domineering father-in-law, a sputtering business, a disagreeable personality, and the little matter of a murder charge lurking in his criminal background. To top it off Best is supposed to be married to Katherine Bard, an actress 10 years his senior, who looked every day of it. That alone would be worse than any death sentence.
9 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed