The Prince & Me II: The Royal Wedding (Video 2006) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
95 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
This movie was okay, not nearly as good as the first
danielle7823 February 2006
Kam Heskin is a pretty talented actress who was a good choice as a replacement for Julia Stiles, but there was very little chemistry between Kam and Luke Mably(Prince Edvard). Luke Mably is a great actor, but I couldn't help noticing that he seemed bored throughout the movie-and in several parts you can see him looking to the side, obviously reading his lines. I was surprised at that.

The movie's plot was okay, Paige and Eddie are starting to feel the pressures of living up to royal expectations. I like the fact that in the start of the movie, it shows Paige attending medical school in Denmark, it shows she didn't give up her dreams of being a doctor.
29 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This Prince Of Denmark Already Dead
michael-connelly319 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Is this movie awful? Revolting? Noxious? No. But given how charming and well written the precursor was, there is no real excuse for this wretched venture into sequeldom. The only thing this film has going for it is a nice performance by Luke Mably, who doesn't seem to realize that he has wandered into a piece of utter rubbish. He stays the course he set in the original, and for that he deserves considerable credit. We have here virtually no one else on board from the original. Perhaps Mably was under contractual obligation for the sequel, maybe he just needed the money, who knows. But this is a movie to stay away from. My wife, who would ordinarily be such a movie's target audience, couldn't abide this steaming heap. A preposterous script that manages to instill boredom and distraction in viewers, caricature milquetoast villains, a predictable happy ending-- there is literally no there there in this movie. It's honestly not even worth renting on DVD, much less seeing in a theater. Better to chase down the first episode, or The Princess Diaries or even The Princess Bride if you're feeling the need for a dash of royalty in your life. Honestly, this movie is rotten on so many levels that there's not space enough to do justice to how bad it is. A Royal disappointment, indeed.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Happily ever after - NOT!
c-235884 April 2017
I was excited to see a sequel to "The prince and me", but when i saw the movie i was very disappointed with the outcome.

first of all, if you're going to make a sequel to a movie then at least try to get the same actors to play the characters. The ENTIRE cast was replaced except for Luke Mably (Prince Edvard)! I understand that some of the actors were not able to play the role at the time, but if that is the case then wait to make the movie until all the original cast is available!

There was no chemistry between Luke and Kim. I think this movie was a bust.

The story line was fine but the actors were terrible. Then in the next movie, (the prince and me 3) they FREAKING CHANGED EDDIE! so there was NONE of the original cast.

i didn't like this movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not a happy ending
swtflirty24 February 2006
I kinda liked the plot of the movie, but what makes the movie so awful is the characters. The new girl that played Paige was more dressy and preppy, and Julia she was more down to earth laid back kind of girl. I'm so disappointed in the movie. All expect for Prince Edward were all different characters. If your going to make a sequel to a movie at least have the same people or don't make a sequel at all. There are just to many movies that don't have the same characters as the first movie. I was so excited when I heard that the movie was coming out. The poster that they have for the movie looked like Julia and on the cover of the DVD. I'm sorry I wouldn't buy this movie.
73 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I was unhappy with the writing and the lack of care in siting, plot and lack of use of original actors
coralcamp18 June 2006
Dear me, I think I was not very happy when I saw this sequel! What can I say kindly? Although the movie was funny, slapstick, and lighthearted, it felt like it lacked much depth of feeling and lacked the more timeless quality of the careful acting and writing and siting of the first version. It was too hurried, and unrealistic; a number of the characters were "plastic" and lacked depth in their development. It's as if someone took the characters in the first movie and put them on a faster time machine, with all that fast talk. It just didn't seem real.

The ultimate anguished moment for me was that the end was too hurried in parts it should not have been, crazy and simply not believable - especially the muted, smiling "parents" - who lacked the depth of the original parents - the kind you can really relate to, not the wax-faced figures that seemed to "appear". The characters were not developed well, although the father in this movie did seem to be a very good actor in his expression of words.

How did the plot evolve? The depth of the characters (except for Luke), clarity of the scenes and plot and the acting was all off-key to me. I apologize for having to be negative, as I like to encourage, but it was just so disappointing! Upon reflection, I think I was shocked and made quite angry to find most of the original cast gone, so great to the first movie. When the original actors are not reused - the immediate thing that happens in my mind is comparing and trying to figure out if this character is really supposed to be the one I saw before - and realizing how different they are, and not in a good way....which takes away from the movie and its plot. I think it must be a reflexive action to do so, and had the original actors been used, it might have had a small chance...

I kept wanting to see the real Soren (although his replacement was good - but too hurried)- what a great character and actor the original Soren is! as well as Julia Stiles and her parents and brothers and his real mother, the Queen (she played it so beautifully, timing was there in her words and actions, as were all the actors in the original cast) and where was the Prince's sweet sister????? It was so sadly not there.....they were so great together in the original movie, so well written and so in-depth with serious issues and real love....you could feel the chemistry betwenn all the actors in the first one.

Had this second movie been done on its own and not as a sequel, it would have happily landed on its feet as a funny farce. But it went into the mud with the Norwegian "Princess", in my book! What happened? Is there any way, any way at all to redo the movie with the original writers, staff, actors, etc? It needs to be done - I would really like to see this plot modified and redone - a really well-done, in-depth romance! Thank you for listening!
36 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Offended and disappointed
laerkeworm11 May 2009
I just saw this movie, and as a Dane, I'm offended and disappointed. It was just so... bad! The plot seemed unoriginal, the cast was .. well, disappointing, and what happened to Paige's hair? Movie 1 it was brown and straight, but now it's unnaturally curly and blond? And the actor? Kam Heskin? Not really...

But what I had the biggest problem with was that this was supposed to be about a Danish prince, and that most of the movie is supposed to take place in Denmark, yet there were no Danish actors (in the first there was at least one), and the actors who where supposed to be Danish couldn't even speak Danish properly, and they almost didn't speak the language at all! I know Danish is a hard language to learn and to speak, the Queen of Denmark's husband doesn't even speak it that well after many years in Denmark, but then you need to employ at least A FEW Danes, instead of just teaching the actors a few words.

Most of the characters' names weren't good either. I don't know if the writer researched Denmark or Norway and Sweeden when finding names, but names like Rosalind and Edward are very rare, and not exactly typical royal names. Harald is not common either, at least not in Denmark. One of our princes' is name Felix! Joachim! Christian! Frederik! I have a whole list of this that seem wrong about the movie from a Danish perspective, I just needed to vent a few.

It just really annoys me that they couldn't take the time to make an effort. I heard the first movie was inspired by the love story of our future king and queen, Frederik and Mary, and in that case, I'm offended on behalf of the royal Danish family.

Gads, that movie was bad.
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I wasted 1hr and 37min of my life on this movie
liria21 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I only half-heartedly hoped that this straight to DVD sequel might have some redeeming quality that most of its ilk do not. It was just as I expected it to be - trite and predictable all the way through, with absolutely NO redeeming qualities whatsoever but for the Hollywood happy ending, for those that must have one (and even that was barely tolerable).

The only actor from the original film that returned to the sequel was Luke Mably, continuing his role as Prince Edvard. (Perhaps that should have given him some indication that making this film wasn't a good idea.) If he is the only reason you want to watch the movie, it's not worth it. Everything I liked about the original was ruined in this sequel, right down to the abysmal dialogue, acting, and plot. None of the new actors seemed to fit into the characterizations created by their predecessors. This made all of them feel stiff, as though they are being forced to express sentiments and traits that are not natural to them. Paige's character had no dimension and none of the endearing qualities that got you to like Julia Stiles originally. Mably has absolutely NO chemistry with the actress playing Paige Morgan and it shows.

Below is a full plot summary. If you do not wish to read the plot and spoilers, please do not read any further.

A greedy, penniless cousin of the royal family who is royalty in Norway finds an old law which reads that if the prince was crowned without a bride, then his bride must be of royal Scandinavian blood or he must abdicate the throne. This noble just happens to have a daughter, Kirstin, who was a playmate of Edvard's when they were younger. She was chubby back then, but surprise! Today she's fit to be a model. Kristin professes to be on Paige and Edvard's side and against her father. Both sides of royalty agree to keep things out of the press, and the royal lawyers do what they can to find a loophole. (Anyone want to guess as to their success?) Meanwhile, Kirstin undermines and humiliates Paige in any way she can, proving that she's out for herself. Edvard can't believe his childhood friend would do such a thing. Paige confronts Kirstin, and then the underhanded cat-fight is on, each trying to humiliate the other as much as possible.

The stress eventually separates Paige and Edvard, and she goes to live in the school dorm until finals are over. Edvard, trying to "do what's right for the people," continues wedding preparations to marry Kirstin instead of Paige. Paige spots a tabloid picture of Eddie in which he isn't smiling as though he loves Kirstin, and then sets out for the school's law library with some friends to try to find the loophole that all the lawyers couldn't find. (Anyone want to bet on her success? Oh, wait, I already mentioned Hollywood happy-ending.) Eddie decides just before the wedding that he can't marry Kirstin. (Who knew?) He finds Paige coming out of the library. She shares the good news. They get Soren to lock Kirstin in her room. (And 'hilarity ensues' as she tries to break her way out and get to the church just in time to make a fool of herself.) Meanwhile, according to a newer law (40 years newer than the one previously discussed), Paige has to read the constitution in Danish in front of the Parliament. She manages it, they marry, Kirstin makes a fool of herself, and it's finally over.

Conspicuously absent in all this: Princess Arabella, Edvard's little sister; not even a mention that she exists. Oh, and why can't Edvard just ask Parliament to update the law? All in all, this movie falls flat on its face in the mud, just like Kirstin did.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Being Danish, I must say....
jsiv16 May 2006
This is THE most horrible movie I have ever seen. I know, I know, I probably have better chances at spotting obvious locational goofs, but seriously. THAT IS A CZECH FLAG IN THE BEGINNING ON THE ROYAL BUILDING (or whatever it was)! But come on people! 4/10 ?! I'm disgusted. The plot is so thin it's crazy. Not to mention the acting! But seriously, the research done before this film is hilarious. Denmark is presented as a kind of royal dictatorship. At some point, and ancient law is brought out from our ancient royal library. Actually, it's 5000 years old.....Becaaaause, we even had writing, laws, let alone a king at the time?! I could go on and on about this nauseating piece of.....argh!! damn that swear filter! Seriously, though, if you REALLY want a shocking movie experience, watch one of the pirated Chinese DVDs with "Engrish" subtitles. That'll render you utterly incapable of understanding what this movie is about.

Have a nice day and do NOT watch this unless you really like bad movies.
48 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Derivative, but pleasant
olszewsk26 May 2006
This sequel, which appears to have been released direct to DVD, has a plot that seems strongly influenced by "King Ralph" and "Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement". All of the principals except Luke Mably are new, so any Julia Stiles fans are likely to experience some disappointment. These things said, the film is quite viewable aside from some sound reproduction problems at times. Page Morgan isn't in Wisconsin any more, and has lost some of the single-minded focus on practicing medicine in the Third World, but remains likable. Prince (now King) Eddie is still likable, but probably a bit too indecisive at times to be a believable king. BTW, as is apparent from the flags (white over red bands with a triangular dark blue canton at the fly) flying from one of the buildings in the opening sequence, the production was filmed in the Czech Republic rather than in Denmark. For me,this was a very watchable flick.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Waste of Luke Mably's Talent
hobojon22 February 2006
I must concur with the previous reviewer the only saving grace in this movie is Luke Mably who once again does a fine job portraying Edvard of Denmark. Kam Heskin who plays Paige Morgan is just plain awful from the Shirley Temple hairstyle, the over the top facial expressions, and the hideous wardrobe. The original film while considered fluff by many at least had some wonderful chemistry between the leads whereas there is zilch between Luke and Kam. The only other character worth mentioning is Zoren and I thought Jonathan Firth did an admirable job. Maryam D'Abo's Queen Rosalind is flat and wooden and King Harald is now bald and sports a beard. Even worse is the couple who portray Paige's parents (look more like her grandparents). I cannot fathom why they chose to turn this sequel into such a screwball comedy.
24 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
For those who love a fairy tale story that is contemporary
camappt21 February 2006
I would have to say this movie was more realistic than the first one. I love both though because it's just your regular love story like Cinderella. If you like fairy tales this one is one of them. Yes there are many out there, but hey that's what we love. This second part is more about leading up to the wedding and things that happen right before it. It happens everyday and stress can cause heap, but in the end LOVE always prevails right?... I would say this is a chic flick but my husband loved both movies as well. It's a really cute story and was worth the rental price. Edvard (Malby) is of course an Adonis. I do have to admit that I was disappointed that they switched girls on him, but I must say Kam Heskin fit the part in the second movie than Julia stiles would have.
8 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Kam Heskin adds to this film!
minmagi507 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I honestly think Kam Heskin was a much better choice for this part! She added so much more enthusiasm, love, sweetness, dignity and humour to Paige Morgan - queen of Denmark wannabe - than Julia Stiles ever put into it.

What pulled the movie down was the fact that Luke Mably hardly tried to hide how bored he was. It looks like he almost sabotages his part! I did not at all see the love, he was supposed to feel for Paige. He just looks tormented and whining.

This movie would have been a lot better had Chris Geere played King Edvard in this movie as well as in the following.

Apart from that, it's still enjoyable to watch. It's funny in places - Søren and the actress who plays Princess Kirsten are hilarious.

Of course it's not at all realistic - not about Denmark or it's monarchy. It's a fairy tale and should be watched as such.

Maybe the author could have done a tiny bit more homework about Danish. it's hilarious - though not intended, I think - when the Danish king - who supposedly speaks Danish perfectly - can say: "Du bliver hurtigt flydende" (= You'll get fluid quickly!)

The word 'fluent' about speaking a language - doesn't translate like that in Danish.

But that's a detail.

It's still a cute, pleasant fairy tale worth watching - though not so good as nr 3 and 4, due to the better chemistry between the actors and a lot more humour.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
boring movie
benilicious200527 February 2006
i just watched this movie last night and i was very very disappointed, what happened to the original cast? this kam heskin actress is no good n this movie,she acts very awkward and seems out of line always,i cant feel inspired. Why are they messing up with this movie it seems this is a very low budget movie. The original cast are all marvelous why are they replaced? The only thing that i will watched this movie is Luke Mably who seems not happy also doing this.Why are they turning this movie into a joke. All the things showed here are all disappointing except for Luke who still perform a great job. I will rate this movie negative.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful
h2ostella27 February 2006
Absolutely Horrible! Where to start? I wanted to turn off the movie from about 10 minutes in but I keep watching, hoping the movie would get better but it just got worst. All the characters are new actors except Luke Malby. I was really disappointed by the new actors of both Soren, Paige and the Queen. Paige was just too fru fu for the Paige that was introduced during the first one. Soren acted way too serious then tried being the comedic relief. But it just didn't work. And the queen wasn't mean enough when Paige screwed up as she did in the first movie. The acting is bad, the story line is bad and even the handsome prince is ugly. The whole budget seems to be about $100 because the clothes were cheap looking and the hair and makeup was horrible. I absolutely hated the way that they did Paige's hair in the movie. Luke Mably comes across as a whiny snob of a prince that was the complete opposite of the guy everyone liked in the first movie. DO NOT EVEN WASTE TIME PICKING UP THE MOVIE OFF THE SHELF!!!!
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
That can't be a good sign when you can predict every line and the next scene after the next
Smells_Like_Cheese4 November 2006
Like I said, my friend and I decided to watch The Prince and Me and The Prince and Me 2 back to back to see what they were like. While, the second Prince and Me started off fairly like a sweet movie, it turned from a teen audience into a little girl's fantasy world. Especially more like a typical Disney princess flick that was unbelievable and I couldn't take seriously, even for a little kid.

It takes off where Paige is now in Denmark and is learning the language, the culture, and the perks of being a queen, including the paparazzi stalking her 24-7. She's also studying still to become a doctor. Edvard is working hard as well to become a good king and is doing the best he can to contain a good king image. But when an old childhood royal friend, Kirsten, gets in the way of the relationship believing that it should only be royalty who becomes king and queen... you can take off with the rest of the plot.

The new girl who played Paige was totally unbelievable as a workaholic study bug, and didn't have the same presence and grace as Julia Styles. The guy who played the prince actually looked irritated to play the role again, I think he knew that this film was a mistake. Oh, well, for the little 5 year old girls who love fairy tales, this is the film for them, let's just pray they don't make a third installment, otherwise with all the making out these two do, it'll be a porno.

1/10
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not Worth Your Time
peterpan777128 February 2006
All I wanted to say is that if the story is not good enough for the original actors/actresses to play in this sequel, then why is it even worth your time in watching it. Think about it, they would get a pay check for acting in this movie, but their thinking that this movie is a load of garbage and would not want to ruin there career's by being seen in it. So what makes you think that it is even worth your time watching it when it wasn't worth the actors/actresses time getting paid to be in it?

Unfortunately, I did not see who was playing in this movie before renting it. It only took me about 10 minutes before the DVD was ejected from my player. If I had continued to watch this travesty, it could have scarred the original in my mind. Don't make the same oversight that I did.
13 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of time to watch the movie
millerjpco21 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is a spoiler comment. I enjoyed the first movies, so I assumed I would enjoy this movie. Wrong, Wrong, Wrong. Its a shame that they could destroy such a good movie. It had potential, but somewhere that was lost in the first 10 minutes. The actors in Prince & Me seem to fit and make magic. The only thing this movie did was clash. Having seen the first movie you would know that Paige or Eddie would find themselves being manipulated by someone that is so obvious. I am such a movie buff. I like most any movie made that is a comedy love story or a sappy love story. This is neither. Don't waste time watching, it is a big disappointment. Prince Eddie does show class in the movie, and I will say the only class.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Danish?!?!?!
sovvi_310 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This was a bad movie!! First of all, I am Norwegian, so I understand danish, and the language Paige speaks in this movie is NOT danish!! I don't know which language she spoke, dutch maybe?? I don't know. And what happened to the actors from the first movie?? The actors in the first movie were great, but in this second movie the girl who play Paige SUCK!! And I hate the plot, don't directors have any imagination?? in this movie >_<

nothing was good in this movie, the actors were bad, their clothes, makeup and their hair -_______- I will NOT recommend this movie to anyone!!

Stay away from it......
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nice continuation of the first film
inkblot1124 January 2007
Edvard (Luke Mably), the young king of Denmark, is set to marry USA commoner Paige in a month or so. Paige, meanwhile, is not only preparing for a wedding but cramming for medical examinations in her quest to become the first physician-queen. Unfortunately, the king of Norway wants to intervene. He is a bankrupt spendthrift who, nevertheless, finds an old Danish law that says Edvard can only marry royal blood. Edvard is not concerned, as the law is ancient, and he orders his underlings to find a way around the law. Yet, the king of Norway brings his young and beautiful daughter, Kristen, to the Danish palace, complicating things. Also, Paige is photographed repeatedly committing silly faux pas, in an attempt to make her unpopular, something Kristen may have a hand in. With all of this turmoil, will there be a happy ending for Paige and Edvard? This is a nice little sequel to the first film. The principal actors are very attractive and winning and the supporting cast quite adequate. The setting is lovely, as Denmark and the royal palaces are very eye-catching. Add to that the nice costumes and you have a film that looks engaging. Perhaps the plot is a bit silly but most romcom fans will embrace it as a duck takes to water. Aren't most funny love stories a bit zany anyways? For those who liked the first film and adore romance movies, do try to find this sequel. It is good, clean fun and, although slight, the movie will enchant its target audience very well.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Trailer
injury-6544721 October 2020
Even just going by the trailer, the lead actor seems like he wants a bullet in the head for being part of this tripe.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
the prince and me movies
elainemilligan17 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
hi i loved all the movies and i was wanting to know if they are going to make a number 5 as i have read a story of one online and it is really good it is about the royal baby i think this is good to have the next chapter in their lives i just love these movies so much. i would love too see number 5 get made the one online that i have read is really good and i hope the person finishes it off cause i just love too see it made into a movie. so i hope that someone will be able to turn it into a movie and have the same story line as the one that i have read online as i don't think the person has finished writing it yet but i hope they do.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a really good actor and charismatic person can do
smoothhoney12651 May 2011
This movie at first was a clear but now is a difficult case for me. Like probably all people who see this film for the first time, I saw "The Prince and Me" first and this second film is way worse than the first film.

The major problem, of course, is that they exchanged almost all of the main cast. This makes it difficult to identify with the story and the characters. Also, it is very obviously that Luke Mably really didn't want to be in this one (and I can understand why he didn't).

The plot is thin, Paige is annoying, Edvard looks repulsed most of the time, and all the other characters are just ridiculous.

That was a while ago. In the meantime I have seen the film about three times. On my free will. What did change my mind? Simple: It was one actor. Jonathan Firth. In my opinion, he is the most elegant, sweet and sensitive character in this film. A real joy to watch. And basically the reason you like watching the whole film in the end.

Because it seems with brilliant actors that, their talent, and the heart they put into the role seems to rub off on the characters and the plot. In his calm and careful presence, Paige suddenly becomes a soft and likable personality, Edvard becomes sarcastic instead of depressed and the bitch of the film seems even bitchier.

So, in the end I can say: "The Prince and Me 2" is really a bad film. BUT Jonathan Firth's performance is worth every minute and you have missed something if you haven't seen him in it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Undeserved bad rap
trekkiegirl857 November 2006
So this isn't the best film of the year. It was still enjoyable, and the acting wasn't as bad as some people would have us believe. Julia Stiles was much better as Paige, and had more chemistry with Luke Mably, but I still found this enjoyable. (And yes, I noticed the "Princess Diaries 2" similarities, but how many variations on a theme can you get?) I didn't rent it expecting an Oscar-worthy film, I just wanted a good old chick flick. I wanted to lose myself in a fairy tale, and I did. If you know what kind of movie you're watching and don't expect greatness, you may well enjoy it.

My biggest problem was that the legal scholars in Denmark are all pretty dumb, if this movie is to be believed. The writers could've used a bit of brush-ups in the history department, too.

Luke Mably may not have been enthusiastic about this movie, but I think he carried it. He showed a more mature Edvard, and I am not an acting scholar but I found his performance enjoyable.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Didn't like it at all
tinarox73111 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I found a lot of things wrong with this movie. First, Julia Stiles did not reprise her role as Paige Morgan, which I thought was a very good role for her. I guess she read the script and decided against it. Second, there was no chemistry at all between Luke Mably (Edvard) and Kam Heskin (Paige). I didn't believe for one second that she was Paige and that they were in love to be married. Luke had much better chemistry with Julia than he had with Kam. It just looked very fake to me and I didn't like them together. Third, at the end of the movie, when Edvard gets Paige back, he says a whole speech to her. It can clearly be seen that he didn't remember his lines, so he's reading his lines from the cue cards near the camera. And as he's reading from it, you can tell when he's waiting for the cue cards to switch to the next line. He clearly didn't want to be in this movie and didn't act his best. It's a good storyline, but the chemistry and the acting made the movie unwatchable. I think they should've stopped at the first movie and not made another 3 after the first one.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I'm not even Danish but....
scfirefighter9717 December 2007
Do some research people. You gotta love Hollywood taking liberties with everything. I guess they think there is no one out there who knows anything about Denmark. I'm not even Danish but I know that one prince is married to someone who is not Danish, she is from Austalia , they were married in 2004, so the entire story line is unbelievable. And also, speeding around the streets of Denmark like the prince (or king as they called him) was, he would have probably hit one of the hundreds or thousands of bicyclists that ride in Copopenhagen everyday. 10 minutes of research would've helped this film a lot, But the again the acting was so brutal, they could've used the Library of Congress and still made a horrible film.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed