Hotell E (1992) Poster

(1992)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
No for art house junkies alone-- but an understanding of politics would help
cornpwn4 February 2010
This is neat take on the political divide witnessed in Eastern Europe during the 80s and 90s... dissolution of powers and the differences in rule, etc. NOT a plot-less toon for drug addled minds, though the semi-surrealist animation may invoke the dirty-hippie hater in you if Disney is more your thing and you are without a decent education.

The previous reviewer just gave themselves away as an ignorant rube by saying "it has no sort of narrative that the ordinary person could understand (without drugs)" and then they went on to say that the two styles of animation hurt their head. Perhaps fairly recent history and current events blow circuits in their brain as well.

The divide is as follows: one pleasantly drawn was for the happier way of life that would result by a new government, the other a very dark scary place because of tyrannical rule. This is actually a surprisingly insightful, look into the tolls taken on people during that shaky time created by a person who lived very close to it all.

Nice & short, cool aesthetic.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
For the art house, not for general viewing...
planktonrules10 September 2009
This Estonian animated film is the sort of thing you might expect to see in some art house or in an artsy animation exhibit or festival. That's because it has no sort of narrative that the ordinary person could understand (without drugs) and the art style is very odd-putting for many out there. While I can respect the effort and various styles they used, this film just isn't very pleasant and is way too surreal and bizarre for my tastes.

The film consists of separate sections identified as Prologue 1 and 2 as well as the film itself. Aside from an interesting recreation of the Last Supper, I didn't get much from the prologues. As for the rest of the film, it also is divided into two worlds--with very different animation. One is very early 1970s pop art (sort of like it was inspired by Leroy Nieman). It's bright and garish and a bit ugly. The other section is very, very dark and surreal. It's depressing to see because of the colors and there are sure a lot of bugs. As to what's happening and why, I am at a total loss.

Overall, this made my brain hurt.
2 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Toot much symbolic
geoffrey-montel11 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I am aware, that I am absolutely not in the closed circle of the art experts, but this work is clearly reserved for this group... Although I appreciated the plot and the duality between the two places (the contrast of the colors, the symbolic of the historical and political conjuncture) ; I still consider this piece of work overfilled with symbols. Even when the main idea is understood, there's plenty of elements in the action you just can't seize. For instance, in the "dark room" (i.e. the "Hotel Europe"), what is the purpose of the picture of the pig ? Why does he write in the back of his wife ? For sure, some of the best ratings can explain me these metaphors, but I can't do it by myself. That's the reason why I "underrate" this piece of art.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Priit Pärn's masterpiece Warning: Spoilers
Even when I appreciate and enjoy the incredible originality from Priit Pärn's shorts ("1895", "The Night of the Carrots" and "Karl and Marilyn") most of those shorts feel somewhat random and without very much sense. (But I still liked them a lot, though.)

However, of all his works, this is by far my favorite one. Not only for the use of many different visual styles (All of them very well done) but also because the story, while at first seems as something random or disjointed, starts making sense at it advances, having a valid message and very accurate satirical elements.

In many ways, this the most serious works from Priit Pärn, being way darker and pessimistic than the rest of his shorts. "Hotel E" maintains a solemn tone from the very beginning, almost without anything of comedy. Even the very few glimpses of what could be considered hints of humor doesn't feel very happy or have a satirical purpose.

The most fascinating aspect from this short, however, it's the use of different styles of animation from every part of the story: The introduction is particularly dark and gives an atmosphere of fear and sadness, having the same feeling of many shorts produced by Soyuzmultfilm, which evokes the Yuriy Norshteyn shorts (Though it is clearly done from a much more pessimistic and bleak perspective) The second "introduction", instead, uses a more polished and realistic visual style (Like the shorts from the Russian animator Anatoliy Petrov) which looks incredibly beautiful, portraying an idealized version of reality through allegories.

Then, there is the "epilogue" (Actually, the longest part of the short) called "The American Dream". In this part of "Hotel E", two different visuals styles are used in order to portray two completely different realities: One is bright, colorful and "mundane", representing the "American Dream", while the other is chaotic, unstable and dark, symbolizing the situation of many communist countries during the early nineties.

In the parts concerning to the "American Dream" the visual style is pleasant, and the psychedelic use of colors it's simply magnificent (Probably done as an homage to artist as Andy Warhol.) In this "reality" the characters are immersed in banal and, at first sight, completely pointless activities that could be seem just merely as hedonist attitudes. Their relationships are shown to be distant and informal, with the youth having a more active role.

A door separates the "American Dream" reality with a zone filled with chaos, where the characters are filled with fear and confusion; they are also involved in many apparently pointless activities which seem to have very serious consequences. From this "reality" there is one characters who moves to the idealized "American Dream" reality, trying to find help him and the others, but things aren't that easy.

Finally, there is a brief sequence, that looks like a spoof of the classic slapstick cartoons that are produced in the United States (Like the Looney Tunes or Tom and Jerry) which serves as a closure for this allegorical tale, that even when at first seems like something obscure or hard to understand, works perfectly well to illustrate the experience lived by many countries that were experiencing the end of communism and socialism. But for modern viewers, it still have a valid message about the differences existent between the rich and the poor, and how those differences make them conceive the reality from a completely different perspective. However, those two different "realities" are always connected, and can't be ignored.

"Hotel E" is an underrated short that deserves way much more recognition. For me, it was the best work from Priit Pärn.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A nice, although confusing short if you haven't a clue about Soviet satellite-nation politics
alistermancub22 April 2012
I find it sad how this wonderful film has a somewhat pitiful rating, all due to the one review.

This, now, this is something. It's thoughtful. Not mean-spirited in much of any way (Anti-Americanism is not something without merit, much as to how most modern countries affected by the British, view their earlier nemesis/tormentor with contempt).

This, and Breakfast on the Grass (1987), are the best of Priit Parn's work. View this with an open mind. View it while understanding the problems that faced many eastern European's at the time...

And most importantly: Know your history. This is not one of those merely-pretentious works you see a lot, today. This is a thought-driven work purely... With a touch of the director's own zeal.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed