Barcelone, principale ville de la Catalogne (1912) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Barcelone, principale ville de la Catalogne review
JoeytheBrit30 June 2020
A throwback to the actualities of the late 19th Century from Spanish trick photographer Segundo de Chomon. Pleasant enough, but nothing remarkable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I hope this is the correct film...
planktonrules12 February 2014
I might have just seen a film that simply isn't listed on IMDb or it might just be one that goes by another name. It's by the Spanish-born director Segundo de Chomón and clearly is NOT "Barcelona Park at TwilightBarcelona Park at Twilight", as I've seen this one and there is no twilight in this film and it has a variety of views of the beautiful city. It is probably "Barcelone, Principale Ville de la Catalogne" but it might also be "View of Barcelona and Surroundings"--two of his documentary style pieces about the town. If I am mistaken in attributing the film to this director or the name of the film, let me know. However, archive.org says it's a Chomón short.

The footage begins on the waterfront in Barcelona and the statue of Columbus standing on the pillar* is prominently featured. The film shows a variety of other footage--much of it from an exhibition that was held there in 1888. Additionally, it goes to the park and some of the footage appears to have been filmed from a boat!

To me this is a great little film because I have been to Barcelona. It's one of the greatest places I've ever visited and it was nice seeing some footage before the more modern construction. A nice look at a bygone era--though much of this is still there today.

*As an ex-history teacher, I should point out that no one knows that Columbus looked like. There are no paintings nor descriptions of the guy's appearance. So, when the pillar was erected for the 400th anniversary of his famous voyage, they just made it up--as do the history books.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Filming Barcelona
kekseksa9 September 2015
The previous reviewer of "this film" is quite correct in saying that the film he has watched on the archive site is not Barcelone parc au crépuscule (Barcelona Park at Twilight), made by De Chomón for Pathé in 1904. The rubric and the title-page both identify "that film" as "Barcelona and its Park" and dates it 1911 (which rather late perhaps for such a short film).

I do not think it can be this film either. The Pathé catalogue description for this makes it clear that it is a kind of early "city symphony" with scenes of traffic, city lights and so on. It also, according to the catalogue, shows the area around Barcelona (Montjuich and the Montanas malas, which do not appear in the film reviewed. It was also - it may well no longer exist - about ten minutes long, so, unless the film reviewed here, which runs for 2-3 minutes, is a severely truncated version, it is not the same.

Unfortunately the "archive" version is slightly truncated (there is a fuller version available on youtube if you can stand the music that goes with it) so what you cannot see on that copy is that the film emerges after going through to show the river once more. It also shows the colophon (if that is the correct word) which reveals the film to have been made for Le Pathé Kok.

This means it must have been made after 1912 (not 1911) in which year a small but important revolution took place in the world of cinema when Charles Pathé brought out his first projector intended for home-viewing of films (ancestor of the cassette and the CD)which he called the Pathé Kok. Popular in the US but not a great success in Europe, the system was abandoned in 1920 to be replaced in 1922 by the more economical, more successful and better known Pathé Baby. Although the Pathé Kok, unlike the 9.5mm Baby, used 28mm film, both systems played very small reels of non-flammable film, so, for both, Pathé would produce abbreviated (often severally abbreviated) films for the home-viewing market. The "archive" film seen by the reviewer may very well therefore be "edited highlights" from this film of 1912, although it could also be a short compilation put together from more than one existing film.

Note that the date of 1911 is improbable for such a short film but the date 1912 is perfect if it was for home-viewing!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed