Masters of Horror (TV Series 2005–2007) Poster

(2005–2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
83 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Season 1 Quick Review
ringlord5928 March 2006
While Masters of Horror Season 1 came and went with it's share of criticisms, I personally thought it was a clear hit. Sure not every episode was flat out scary or true horror, but then again most movies that come out aren't either. And there in lies why the series works. Some of the top writers of the horror genre combined with the top directors in the genre to provide a series were each episode had a unique flare. Sure some episodes were better than others, but that just how it goes.

Here's my quick thoughts on the series with the episodes ranked as to how I liked them. If looking for a synopsis of each show, look elsewhere.

1. Jennifer - This was Dario Argento at the top of his game and the best thing he's done in years. Steven Weber did an excellent job in the lead role and as the writer of the teleplay. The episode generally creeped me out and it had truly disgusting scenes. The best show of the first season.

2. Cigarette Burns - Most John Carpenter movies provide the view with a slow build of suspense which leads to a final outcome. This episode is no exception. Again one of the better things Carpenter has done in awhile and I love the story concept. The one flaw was the the search for this extremely rare film seemed a bit rushed. Cant help but think this would have made an even better full length film.

3. Deer Woman - A classic example of horror comedy, done only as John Landis can do it. The lead character was great. Almost everything about the episode just clicked.

4. Incident On and Off a Mountain Road - A clever story based off a Joe Lansdale tale, directed by Don Coscarelli. It's great to see a strong female lead and one that may be more twisted than the serial killer she takes on.

5. The Fair Haired Child - A Lovecraftian type story that really surprised me. The creature in this one was incredible. Directed by William Butler and was far better than the few movies his done.

6. The Pick Me Up - The man who bought us ultra campy horror movies in the 70's & 80's, Larry Cohen puts together a solid episode pitting a girl against two deranged serial killers.

7. Haeckel's Tale - Taken from a story from Clive Barker (which is again very Lovecraftian) and directed by John McNaughton. Definitely some very disturbing scenes but a fairly interesting episode none the less.

8. Dance of the Dead - Tobe Hooper directed this episode, and it really a far cry from what he normally does. Very MTV video style. Nice twist.

9. Dreams in the Witch House - Stuart Gordon does HP Lovecraft as only he can. A twisted little story that updates the story for modern times.

10. Sick Girl - An odd tale by Lucky McKee that loaded with dark humor. A nice concept.

11. The Homecoming - Many great horror movies actually have a lot of political subtext. This episode is a flat out slap at the current War in Iraq and the Presidential regime. This one makes you think a bit.

12. Chocolate - I liked the story behind this Mick Garris episode and though it fell apart a little at the end. Overall it's not that bad.
74 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A mixed bag.
Fmartiterron30 May 2006
When I learned of this series, I was thrilled. I'm a big follower of some of the directors involved, such as Tobe Hooper, John Carpenter or Dario Argento, and the idea that they would be given freedom and resources to direct one-hour self-contained horror stories made me shiver with anticipation.

The results, however, are a mixed bag. Don't take me wrong, most of the directors involved seem to be in good shape, and the stories have potential, but the writing and the acting are, with some notable exceptions, just by the numbers.

Anyway, if you like horror you won't mind spending a few hours with the lesser episodes. They're still above average, and the series has enough hidden gems to keep you wanting more.

My favorite episodes were, in no particular order: "Incident on and off a road mountain" (Don Coscarelli), "Cigarette Burns" (John Carpenter), "Deer Woman" (John Landis)and "Sick Girl", directed by Lucky McKee.

I just heard the series has been renewed for another season. All I can say is that I will keep watching it.
32 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cigarette Burns
Chipsmannen10 May 2008
A friend of mine bought vol 1 of season one and I thought: Hmm, maybe this is something like modern Tales From The Crypt or maybe a modern version of Tales From The Darkside so I decided to see one episode, which was Cigarette Burns. Before I borrowed it, my friend said it contained scenes of extreme gore so I thought it would be another ordinary splatter, but I was so wrong. It turned out to be the scariest thing I have ever seen... The violent and gory scenes weren't scary, but the small clips from the movie: "La Fin Absolude de Monde" scared me to death. I can honestly tell you that Cigarette Burns is John Carpenters finest work.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Irregular, but enjoyable
Agnelin25 July 2011
I find that "Masters of horror" is a good continuation of the style of independent short horror stories that was the trademark of "Tales of the crypt" (among others). They share many similarities, one of which is the very irregular overall quality, with some remarkable episodes that are scary fun to watch many times, and others that are simply embarrassing to watch as episodes of a show that is supposed to bring you the best of horror by many film-makers who earned a reputation in this genre; but still, most have some redeeming quality, be it the irresistible campiness, a good story (though badly developed), or decent acting. There were few episodes which I personally found boring (having said this, I would advise anyone to stay away from "Chocolate").

Some episodes feel a little too long, while others ("Deer woman", remarkably) would have benefited from a good quarter of an hour more of running time. Most have at least some gore, many have varying degrees of dark humor, and there's a good amount of sexy contents, too. What stands out most and links this show to the aforementioned "Tales from the crypt" is that most episodes have this underlying feeling of poetic justice and that the "bad guys" get what they deserve, which is quite refreshing.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Festival views of the Landis, Garris and Dante segments (no spoilers)
albertofarina18 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I've just come back from the Torino Film Festival, and was thus able to check out a few episodes that have yet to be screened in the U.S. I thought I'd write down a few quick notes just to highlight the treats that are up for Showtime viewers.

I was able to see - projected on a big screen in HD - the episodes directed by Landis, Dante, Argento, Hooper, Garris and Coscarelli. And the first thing to say is each one of them would deserve an individual spot here on IMDb. Although it kinda makes sense to review the pilot of most TV series, on this particular one that is a big mistake: the whole point of this format, created by Mick Garris out of a series of friendly dinners with fellow horror directors, is there's no conceptual format. Yes, each episode is a horror, and yes, each episode is about 1-hour. But that's as far as the format goes: each episode is distinctly personal, and only reflects the style of its author-director. Judging the series as a whole is therefore pointless.

That said, all the episodes I've seen are really worth watching and much above average television. You've already been able to see Hooper's disturbing "Dance of the Dead" segment, Coscarelli's fast-paced "Incident On and Off a Mountain Road" and Argento's sickeningly sexy "Jenifer", of course. Be sure not to miss Landis', Garris' and especially Dante's episodes when they air.

John Landis's "Deer Woman" is a radical development of the whole premise behind such a classic as "An American Werewolf in London". The idea on that film was giving the werewolf myth a realistic, almost everyday spin to make it scary again in spite of tons of bad werewolf movies. "Deer Woman" does the same, only the premise is even more outrageous, because the monster is something you're unlikely to having heard about before: a creature half woman and half deer which seduces men and then kicks and tramples them to death. With such a ridiculous premise, you'd never believe a filmmaker could produce the smallest shiver in any average viewer. The fact that "Deer Woman" does, without relying on any established movie myth, is a tribute to Landis' (John, but also his son Max, who wrote the screenplay) deep knowledge of how horror movies work. Without even the slightest hint of parody, this film is funny *and* scary and a triumph of what is called suspension of disbelief. Great performances by former "Dream On" star Brian Benben and heart-stopping newcomer Cinthia Moura.

Mick Garris's "Chocolate" is based on a "Twilight Zone" like premise: a guy suddenly starts sharing a stranger woman's senses - it all starts with sounds, and then it becomes images and event tactile feelings. This lures him into an obsession which is very similar to love but also has a strong potential for tragedy. Kind of an ultimate "amour fou", this is quite a bizarre, yet moving, love story that you'll find both involving and desperate.

Joe Dante's segment was acclaimed by thunderous applause at the festival, and it is the most overtly political. I wish someone would dare doing a similar film on our (Italian) administration: "Homecoming" deals openly with how Iraqi war was based on the blatant lie of Mass Destruction Weapons that were found not to exist, and has dead marines coming back from their graves as zombies to let the Bush administration know what they think of its lies. The President is actually never mentioned in person: but the clues are so crystal-clear one couldn't miss even if he tried hard. Witty and bitterly cynical, this is a film a Billy Wilder might have made if he was interested in horror. It should be a must-see for anyone who's voted for the current administration - and also for anyone who thinks horror cannot deal with important issues.

I am dying to see the next episodes.

(update of april 26th, 2006)

At last I was able to see "Imprint", the 13th episode in this 12 episode series, and the one that was deemed too gruesome to actually be aired on US television. It was screened, however, in the UK (albeit with some cuts, or so they say) and on a big screen at the Italian "Far East Film Festival" - which makes sense since it's directed by Takashi Miike. You can't help but admire this man's portentous energy: he keeps cranking out movie after movie after movie, and he does so without giving any impression of fatigue, or of cutting corners. True, "Imprint" does have a couple of very long, static, takes that effortlessly beef up the final footage: but they work that way, and contribute notably to the result. In spite of some dialog that sounds annoyingly literate (and it's mostly over-acted, which does not help) this episode is strong on atmosphere since its very beginning, with the main character being carried on a heavily charged boat on eerie waters. Not all of the story makes a lot of sense, but neither does expecting logic from a horror film. This one has a typically Miikian torture scene which is sure to make anyone cringe (it involves, just so you know what you'll have to endure as a watcher, suspension bondage and needles under fingernails and gums), and a freak-happy ending that is quite disturbing, in a silly kind of way. I saw a version that allegedly was slightly cut, but - surprisingly - was a little longer than the average MoH episode, running up to a little more than 1h.
30 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Do it again Mick, PLEASE!!!
super marauder6 June 2013
I bought Cigarette Burns and Pro-Life because I'm a huge John Carpenter fan. What I wouldn't give to spend a day with him.

My daughter got me the first season for Christmas and I love it!

The idea is great: It's one hour movies and it's the directors who are the stars. There is some great stuff here! Shock, suspense, camp, comedy, heartbreak, political satire, J-horror, it's all here! I will review all the episodes one at a time because I feel I can't lump them together. Some got me more then others but they are all entertaining. Isn't that what a horror movie is supposed to do?

However I must point out there no good looking teenagers getting slaughtered by a guy in a mask. Good! I'm sick of that!
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dreams in the Witch House
ddukart3 April 2007
Okay, so I'm a Lovecraft freak, so what? There's lots of us out there....lurking. Okay, I'll add the Clive Barker episode, too (Haekler's Tale). Well, I personally thought that one was really Lovecraftian, too. Okay, first, Dreams in the Witch House. Not too bad. Pretty typical Stuart Gordon (particularly with changing most of the story). The main character, Ezra Godden seems to be able to hold his own in the acting arena, so I imagine die-hard Combs fans won't die outright. It worked. Since that was such a short story, it all fit into the alloted episode time, without leaving out too much. Overall, it was a pretty good adaption, so all you Lovecraft fans won't be disappointed.

Now, Onto Haekler's Tale. The HPL influence is really strong in some modern writer's material. This is no exception to the rule. The setting was done really well, and the mood, nice and evil.

It's to bad this series was canceled. It was very good for a horror series and there was plenty of good episodes.

It's too bad so many people prefer "Loser TV" (aka reality shows). Get a life, losers! TV is to entertain people, not point and laugh at the misfortune of others. I don't know about the rest of you out there, but I for one and very sick of seeing the EXACT SAME THING with different names clogging up channel after channel.

And, yes, this is relevant. Good shows get canceled, because everyone seems to want 5 different versions of American Idol.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The MASTERS' Touch, Part One...
cchase5 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Unless you've been living under a rock, or working the third shift at your job, you know by now that Showtime's provocative series MASTERS OF HORROR is the brainchild of creator/writer/producer/director Mick Garris (STORM OF THE CENTURY, THE SHINING, THE STAND). Known as one of the better adapters of Stephen King material, Garris conceived the idea by way of a series of bi-monthly dinners he attended with some close friends and colleagues, who also happened to be many of the famous (or infamous) horror/fantasy directors who make significant contributions to the series. Made mostly in Vancouver on ten-day shooting schedules with limited budgets, each director tackles a particular piece of material in the style they are most famous for with horror and fantasy fans worldwide.

I can only base my reviews on the installments I have seen, so here's my take on each one, not necessarily in order of broadcast:

INCIDENT ON AND OFF A MOUNTAIN ROAD. Directed by Don Coscarelli (PHANTASM); written by Coscarelli and Stephen Romano, based on the story by Joe Lansdale; starring Bree Turner, Ethan Embry, Angus Scrimm and John de Santis as 'Moonface.' Given that it has an interesting premise, (victim of spousal abuse by a psycho-survivalist matches wits with a deranged serial killer), I've heard that this wasn't one of Joe's best, and with the hit-and-miss style in which Coscarelli seems to have shot it, I would tend to agree. It's good to see the likable Embry playing an absolute bastard, and Ms. Turner is great in the classic Marilyn Burns-style heroine role. Yet much like the hit TV series LOST, the flashbacks (between the two of them) are much more engaging than the main focus of the story, which is all about Turner's struggle to survive in the killer's lair. And as fun as it is to see Angus Scrimm reunited with his old PHANTASM buddy, his presence is criminally wasted here. Good action sequences (no surprise there) and helped by Coscarelli's strong visual sense, but it's mostly worth ** out of four stars.

DANCE OF THE DEAD. Directed by Tobe Hooper ('SALEM'S LOT); written by Richard Christian Matheson, based on Richard Matheson's short story; starring Jonathan Tucker and Robert Englund as the MC. Tobe does what he's best at: innocence lost meets evil and depravity incarnate and triumphs...or makes said moral and spiritual compromise in order TO triumph. In a post-apocalyptic, plague-ridden world that makes any place Mad Max has been seem like Club Med, patrons of a club where Goth-meets-grunge in the Ninth Circle of Hell, are entertained by the chemically-fueled gyrations of briefly reanimated corpses as the main spectator sport. In the midst of this unholy mess is the story of a sweet, innocent young thang who meets a bad biker boy, (the monumentally talented Tucker), in a 'Romeo-and-Juliet'-esque tale with a very dark twist, which puts a whole new spin on the concept of 'family values'. As the MC of the "Dead Can Dance" dive which is the story's central focus, Englund gets the tour-de-force performance, natch, doing what he does best. In this case, he might even be a little more unsettling than the alter-ego he's best known for, Freddy Krueger. Filmed in a jittery, dreamlike style that merges experimental art film with rapid-fire MTV editing, (think E. Elias Merhige meets the Brothers Quay), it's a whole different style for the CHAINSAW MASSACRE director. For me, this had a better, more "Twilight Zone"-ish ending than INCIDENT, so some may find it more accessible, if not as grounded in realism as Hooper's earlier work. This gets **1/2 out of four.

JENIFER. Directed by Dario Argento (SUSPIRIA); written by Steven Weber, based on the original graphic story by Bruce Jones and Berni Wrightson; starring Steven Weber, Beau Starr and introducing Carrie Anne Fleming as JENIFER. The master of Italian gialli, Dario Argento, works his macabre magic with almost surgical skill with this one, bringing to life a tale so twisted that it sears itself into your memory with the same intensity as the original story upon which it's based. Writer/actor Steven Weber, (so good in Mick Garris' reworked version of THE SHINING) stars as world-weary cop Frank Spivey, whose life and sanity are destroyed by a fateful encounter with a young girl. Frank interrupts what appears to be a murder-in-progress: a crazed maniac wielding a meat cleaver over a bound, helplessly cowering figure. But even after Frank fatally shoots the man and frees the girl, all is not what it seems. Frank has just met "Jenifer," which is the only word the dying man can utter with his last breath. Jenifer is a mute, graced with a body that would shame the Venus de Milo. But the problem with her speech is horrifyingly clear, as the poor girl also has a unnaturally deformed face that would stop a clock...especially if that clock is BIG BEN. Confused by his simultaneous feelings of repulsion and sympathy, Frank takes the girl into his house, once he discovers that she is homeless. But at the core of his compassion, which his wife and son understandably don't share at all, is something compelling, disturbing and powerful that he can't deny, explain or resist...He has fallen under Jenifer's insidious spell, and as she systematically destroys his will, his sanity and finally his life, he discovers that she is one siren/succubus whose appetite for the flesh is not limited merely to rounds of mind-blowing sex, in horrifically erotic sequences that will make you cringe and yet leave you unable to avert your eyes at what's on-screen...Weber does some of his best acting ever as Frank makes the constantly shifting transitions from sympathy, to lust, to revulsion, to self-loathing, to outrage and back again. *** out of 4. (To Be Continued.)
25 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Far too gory for my taste
pink_london_kitty2 December 2007
As a horror fan, I prefer more subtle movies, while "Masters of Horror" was packed with intestines belonging to eviscerated children and infants. The stories, though with some potential, were overshadowed by the disturbing images. Whenever I would watch an episode I kept shivering "Gee, that was odd...". I wasn't at all thought-provoking, it just wanted to impress gore fans - not true horror fans or those of you who like atmosphere horror and not flesh/blood/organs horror. They focused on crude images and mere graphic violence. Just a 6 out of 10 for this splatter series, as I would give to any such movie. With a pretentious name like "Masters of Horror" you can't help but expect more.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Concept Show
jed-estes6 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I love that this series is giving the directors a chance to be the stars and tell what the want to tell with almost no censorship. I think Mick Garris has touched on something wonderful here and I hope it goes on for years. I believe the second season will be better than the first because this time the directors will have had more time to adapt to the style of the one hour format and can now run with that. I see to that they are getting better actors this time around, last year had good ones too this is just a bigger list. i think that John Landis's episode is the best of the bunch and I thought most of the others were great too. I think Gordon's and Carpenter's needed the most work and I found Mick Garris's own episode to be dull the others though are great I love them. Can't wait to have them all on DVD. Wathc this show.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Thoroughly entertaining (in one way or another)
kosmasp22 June 2010
A really good first season of the Masters of Horror. Even if you could argue if some directors should be called that (some had only made one Horror movie up to that point), you still can see the blueprints of the directors shining through their works. Be it Landis (with a mixture of Comedy/Horror) or Carpenter (with a very strong visual style and an atmosphere that really gets you) or one of the other directors. Some you may like, others you may think are not worthy to be here. But all in all, even if some episodes lack in a few areas (be it acting-, story- or set-design-wise), the complete package is really good.

The mixture is what I liked about it and even if I'm not a big fan of Miike, his episode is and will be one of the most talked about. It's crazy and more then surreal, but it won't leave you unaffected (for better or worse). The same can be said, about Argentos episode, who as many have said, has lost his touch (see Hooper for similarities, if you will). For sheer fun factor even his episode has something to offer ... incredible bad performances, bad editing, but also some nice gore and make-up effects.

If you like drama and political comments mixed with your Horror movies, you will adore Homecoming. On the other hand, you might think it's the least "Horror" episode of the pack. Whichever way you feel, all seem to agree that Carpenters episode is one of the best of the series. He makes even Udo Kier look menacing (not that easy, considering his accent!) ;o)

Pick me up is another episode, that might leave you either bored/annoyed or completely ecstatic (latter would be me). If you are not on the "watching the whole thing" kinda vibe, you might wanna read some reviews of the individual episodes to make up your mind. Generally speaking, most comments will show you, if an episode will hit home with you.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good Ones and Bad - Very Hit and Miss at Times
Swimdude2077 March 2008
As a whole the TV series of wonderful and I hope they continue. It is rather refreshing to see films like these. Most often in the film industry, ESPECIALLY with horror films, directors must do certain things and follow unwritten rules if they want their full length film to be big budget and to become a feature film that airs in theaters.

With this show, it gives some of the best horror directors of all time the change to really show what they can do. There are absolutely no limitations on which stories are being told. The director has complete control over his creation with out having to follow in rules that big feature films do. And with the exception of a few rules put on by Showtime, they also have freedom over how they tell the story too.

But this is both a blessing and a curse as it makes the movies either hit or miss. There is no middle ground. The episode is either great of it is horrible. And this is solely do to directors' choices.

For example, John Carpenter and Dario Argento have wonderfully horrific and captivating episodes. They tell the short story magnificently and create true horror master pieces. Yet John Landis' contributions can't make the par. He doesn't use his time wisely for the one hour that he is given and as a result his contributions are predictable and slightly cliché. And finally, Mick Garris has hit both sides. His film, Chocolate, from season one was just awful. Slow moving, dull, and predictable. But his episode from Season 2, Valerie on the Stairs, his terrific. Suspense, unpredictable ending, and very will filmed.

As a whole though, this series has been wonderful and contains from beautiful gems of horror films that just never could have done as well if stretched beyond an hour or done as well if tried to turn into a big budget, profit earning film.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Imprint Review **SPOILER alert**
Ark-Flash2 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Finally picked up the "Banned from Broadcast" DVD. As a Miike & genre fan, I have some mixed feeling about Imprint: THE GOOD: Miike gives his fans an equally horrific needle torture scene a la Audition. On top of that he throws in some taboo abortion with floating fetus scenes. I know, sick stuff. The cinematography and colour Red were strong and equally memorable. Also the prostitute castings were great. THE BAD: Billy Drago, yeah he looked the part, but his acting is something to be desired. Some of his lines and delivery were pure fromage. I understand the creative reasonings behind having the dialogue in English, but I think it should have been shot in Japanese, with Billy struggling in English and basic Japanese. THE UGLY: I get the whole brother sister inbred produced the deformed daughter(s) thing, but a hand with a talking little face coming out of the head, c'mon now, that looked really lame. (Reminded me of curling your index finger around your thumb, drawing little eyes on the top and making your hand speak). Lame! THE FUNNY: Anyone else thought the Japanes brothel midget looked like DeepRoy from Charlie & the Chocolate Factory? Overall its a mixed bag with obvious strengths and weaknesses, I generously rate this one a 7. But essential viewing for Miike and MOH fans with a strong intestinal fortitude.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Blood and guts do not equate to suspense and horror
bekayess6 December 2006
Okay, so after watching about 10 episodes of this series, most in the new season, I am SOOOOOO tired of seeing blood and guts (i.e., human intestines) being pulled out of a human being and shoved into my face--and the face being chopped off by an animal trap, as in PELTS. Gore has its place, but this show is more gore than substance. Although some of the shows have been quite good, most have tried to gross us out, and even then they use the old tried-and-true plots--going back to the old Universal horrors--but without style or intelligence or artistry. At least TALES FROM THE CRYPT on HBO--well, in the old days when it was on, I guess) was more about style than grossness. Mind you, I am not squeamish..but this show isn't even close to the class of TFTC and other horror/suspense shows of the past. Bad TV is bad TV.
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A comment on "Cigarette Burns."
tristrammd7 January 2006
Persistence paid off-- I was eagerly looking forward to this series. I have been a fan of horror as a genre for most of my adult life. The genre is so diverse-- ranging from low-brow slasher films to the deeply disturbing and the sublime. This one episode will shake you for a long time. It does have a few shocks which will scare you-- even in the comfort and safety of your own living room. But it also is deeply intense and disturbing in a sinister and cerebral way. Carpenter is a great director who, even when lending his talents to more colloquial fare (such as "Vampires"), still is able to deliver a satisfying film. This chapter in the series is phenomenal. It would not surprise me if this is the reason the series is remembered decades from now. A great horror short film and finally redeems the series and makes its premise true: Carpenter is a master of horror.

Watch this episode. In my area it is available "on demand."
52 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best series ever made
dmaroul19951 May 2009
"Masters of Horror" was the series I was looking for.I am a horror fan and I think both season 1 and season 2 are perfect.Every episode has blood and assassinations!I love it!It has suspense and some are funny too!I think it had to be also a season 3.Some episodes are scary and others are disgusting.It has also perfect tortures and characters.It has monsters,killer,zombies.The best episodes are Jennifer,the deer woman,we all scream for ice cream,cigarette burns imprint and dream cruise.It's the best!I have no words for it.You just have to see all the episodes and you will remember me.It is just perfect.Perfect is not enough.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best things I have seen in the Horror Genre, even though it is not a movie.
gene87-17 January 2007
This show does for me what movies cannot. It makes me think seriously about life. I cannot explain why. But it is so real. You feel like you are in the show. Not in some campy, oh this is funny sense, but in a wow, I am so scared out of my mind right now. I feel like most of the episodes are out of body experiences, start to finish.

As a person I am always thinking "What would I do in that situation; what is the next move?" so when I see people get killed for doing stupid stuff in these shows, I think the same might happen to me.

One of the things I absolutely love are the characters. I have seen a few of my favorite actors/ actresses on this show. And also some that I never heard of before, but thoroughly enjoyed. Also, they are good at putting sex into a TV show, in an adult, but yet not overly done way. It is very tasteful.

You feel very much like an adult when watching this show, and for me that is good. And when I get older and have more money to spend, this is definitely something I want to have in my DVD collection, and hopefully when it is all said and done, (which I hope does not happen anytime soon), they will put all the episodes in a beautiful box set, with a nice booklet, and a ton of extra features.

All in all, if you are looking for something better than all the cheap remakes, and bad horror one-offs, then check this out. YOu will either pee your pants, or wish your closest friends were there to enjoy the show with you.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Bit for Everyone
tributarystu14 January 2006
Up to now, "Masters of Horror" has been a somewhat lukewarm experience. Each episode is truly independent and it bears the mark of its director...more like a short film, than part of a series. Some episodes, I dare say, have very little to do with horror. Others are, however, extraordinary, horrific adventures.

I'll try to sum up the episodes I've seen by placing them in three, friendly categories. Unfortunately, there are only two episodes which I would whole-heartedly name 'a success, through and through'. These are Argento's "Jenifer" and Carpenter's "Cigarette Burns". The first is a sadistic, nauseating experience, with a great leading lady. It's special because it truly leaves a mark. The second is a very engaging episode, developing some intriguing ideas regarding the world and power of film. It works on the head, this one does.

Most of the episodes are 'so-so'. John Landis' "The Deer Woman" is a fun romp, just that it doesn't fully comply to my interpretation of 'horror'. Still, as I said, it's entertaining. Malone's "Fair Haired Child" (which I had expected to be a mess) was extremely decent, a teeny bit sadistic in a funny sort of way and just creepy enough to stick to you. The first episode, directed by Don Coscarelli, "Incident On and Off a Mountain Road" is a fine exercise in style, with a twist. Although it doesn't break any boundaries, it's acceptable. Tobe Hooper's "Dance of the Dead" delivers a fantastic atmosphere, but it just doesn't reach deep enough to leave an imprint on the viewer's retina or elsewhere. "H.P. Lovecraft's Dreams in the Witch-House", directed by Stuart Gordon, is another half silly - half frightening story, with an end that truly feels like cherry on top.

There were two episodes which simply left me numb - in the worst way possible. First, Mick Garris' "Chocolate" which is as horror as "The Shining" is comedy. It's tedious and totally uneventful, as it builds up for a decent idea to end it all. Yet, it remains a bore for me. The other episode - and I know quite a few will disagree - is Joe Dante's "Homecoming". Now, I'm not dumb (or so I trust) and I understand that it's supposed to be a satire. But it's just too political and straight-forward and I felt like a bit of an idiot, having to check in all those 'hints' at you know who. The episode is far from scary and even though I appreciate the basic idea (dead soldiers coming back to life in order to vote - just brilliant!) the way it was all put together is simply lousy.

So that's the way I saw it to the present day, 15th of January 2006. In general, there's always a hint of an interesting idea in every episode and each one is different from the other in several regards. I admit I'm quite excited to see how the last few episodes turn out. Try to watch them even if you haven't watched any other episode until now, there's nothing to worry about. And chances are, it'll be time well spent.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Most Powerful Horror Film I Have Ever Seen
bag4819214 July 2006
Hearing a lot about the Masters of Horror series, i decided to pick this one up. I was expecting a decent film, but what i saw extremely surpassed my expectations. Out of all the important messages delivered in this film, the most important i thought was about the soldiers. We hear on the news all the time about military leaders preaching that their soldiers did for their country and were proud of it. They do all the talking for them. However, what if those soldiers were given the chance to express how they felt about the war and their government. Even though the film is a lil bit liberal biased, being liberal myself i didn't mind, it still delivers a powerful and emotional message.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice series but...
ppery29 August 2006
I give it a 7... The series were lots of fun except of the Homecoming... It irritated me so much I had to pass to the next episode. It was pure (boring) political propaganda which really had nothing to do with the atmosphere of the series. I don't want to start a political thread on it so I'll pass - but it really makes me mad how a theme like this was ABUSED in this movie, so much that the director itself becomes one of the "players" in the "game" (as defined in the episode). Quite impressed by Dario Argento, since like many said, even though he made fun (not good and neither othe best of the series) episode, finally made something watchable after years.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cigarette Burns and Jennifer are the master piece!
yu-8516721 February 2018
I just saw these 2 episodes because famous directers engaged in.

Both titles let you feel like watching more than 2 hours great horror film rather than single drama episode. Both episodes have crazy and creepy tone in entire story. If you're a big horror fan, you'll absolutely love these 2 titles!

Highly recommended!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
MOH is, of course, a mixed bag
astonmartin728 February 2007
The Masters of Horror series which began in 2005 is certainly a mixed bag. Not only are there many different film-makers working on these episodes, but the budgets seem to be limited on some level.

Like the first 5 seasons of The X-Files, the episodes are shot in Vancouver and the British Columbia environment in Canada, so directors need to be creative in order to make it all work as effectively as possible.

The best of the bunch that I've seen so far are: William Malone's The Fair Haired Child (which is an emotional and horrific fairy-tale), Joe Dante's surprisingly effective and detailed Homecoming (bear with the opening 5 minutes or so), Don Coscarelli's Incident On and Off a Mountain Road, Lucky McKee's Sick Girl and Dario Argento's second offering Pelts which may have the highest level of gore and sleaze in all the Masters of Horror so far! Way to go, Dario! You're still the man!

Next tier down would be Takashi Miike's Imprint, John Carpenter's Cigarette Burns and possible Larry Cohen's Pick Me Up. There are about three more I've seen which I won't mention (out of respect for the film-makers!).
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Perfection in horror
willem-heye11 August 2006
The ultimate collection from the masters of the macabre! There is not one film that a horror fan didn't want to see. From Imprint to Dreams in the witch house, it will give you a bad feeling to sleep. Not only the fans of horror, also thriller fans will love this masterpieces. This aren't just episodes of some directors, they are perfection on television. Many of the real horror fans have waited for this collection to come. And here it is, named as: Masters of Horror!

Some movies in the series are even better than there longer films. To me, its the ultimate is film history, end specially of the history in horror movies.

They will leave you with a sense of horror!
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Fair-Haired Child
Ali_John_Catterall15 November 2009
Among the roster of 'Masters' (Dario Argento, Tobe Hooper, etc) showcasing their knockoffs for this anthology one name may leap out as glaringly unfamiliar. William Malone? Who he? Well, among other things, Malone directed 1999's The House On Haunted Hill remake and 2002's FeardotCom. Oh, and an episode of 'Honey I Shrunk The Kids: The TV Show'.

Not impressed? Really, give the guy a break! When you consider, say, Argento's laughable Jenifer from the same series, perhaps we ought to give this rank outsider and his Fair-Haired Child a chance.

Now, unfold those crossed arms because, aside from Malone's uncredited perfromance as George Harrison in Robert Zemeckis' superb debut I Wanna Hold Your Hand, he's also way more influential in the horror game than you might think, having helped to create dozens of movie monster masks - along with Michael Myers' 'Shape' visage for John Carpenter's Halloween (admittedly, that one was easy - he simply sprayed a William Shatner mask white, but still).

A riff on WW Jacobs' Edwardian classic 'The Monkey's Paw' (and latterly, Clive Barker's 'Hellraiser'), Fair-Haired Child sees two eccentric classical musicians, Judith (Petty) and husband Anton (Samples) attempt to bring their son Johnny (Haddock) back from the dead after he accidentally drowned on his fifteenth birthday. And, through black magick, they do - after a fashion.

Trouble is, their waterlogged offspring now resembles the result of some giggling gangbang between Dan Dare's Mekon and HR Giger's Alien Queen. To keep him in anything vaguely resembling humanoid form they must sacrifice a dozen teenagers, one every year, on the boy's birthday. With each virgin's blood spilled, Johnny morphs a little closer to complete restoration. As the half-crazed Anton figures, "the dead shall live again - new blood for old."

The couple's twelfth candidate for sacrifice, class outcast Tara (Pulsipher), is kidnapped from her local high school; knocked off her bike, chloroformed, and bundled into a van - as the funereal adagio from Beethoven's 'Seventh' saws ominously away on the soundtrack in its sly, elitist and deeply untrustworthy way.

Flung into a basement, graffitied with the pleas of previous blood donors, Tara encounters a cupboard full of severed heads that would make Jeffrey Dahmer blink, a bathtub spattered with human vino, and what she at first imagines is another sacrificial lamb; a mute, guilt-ridden Johhny - who's having a little trouble keeping his skin on. It's a distressing process for both parties.

As that great 1980s bard El DeBarge put it, "Who's Johnny, she said, and tried to look the other way." Shockingly, given our emotional investment in Tara thus far, the now transformed cellar-dweller goes to work on her like Fanny Craddock with a dead chicken. Further shocks - and a predictable twist - will be along in a minute.

The worst you can say about The Fair Haired Child is it looks and feels pretty much like what it is: an anthology movie in the 'Tales From The Crypt' vein, with an extra helping of giblets. It's also a touch repetitive towards the end and, despite its expectation-confounding turns, once you've spotted the twist stomping over the hill, even a little draggy.

Oddly, given the director's pedigree, the rubbery-looking monster's not much cop either. That said, Malone makes a virtue of his dark fairytale's budgetary constraints, offering lashings of atmosphere, creepy flashbacks and unnerving dream sequences (shot in the now-familiar monochrome style), while the cast put it some believable and sympathetic performances (particularly Lori Petty who, as a mother driven mad with grief, at least has something better to work with here than in Tank Girl).
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Should be called "Masters of Horrible"
kingsx252135 February 2007
I was very excited when this series premiered in 2005. The premise was very simple and appealing: each episode would be a one-hour mini movie directed by a famous, noteworthy horror director. Then, when I finally watched them it was a bit of a letdown. Some good episodes emerged from that first season, but all in all it was a mixed bag. I attributed it to the learning curve, and figured that season 2 would be a whole lot better.

Boy, was I in for a shock. At least season one had a few good stories here and there. Season 2 (with the exception of "The Black Cat" starring the excellent Jeffrey Combs) was a complete and total loss to me. The episode "Sounds Like" may very well be the worst thing I have watched on TV in the last 10 years, and most of the other episodes aren't much better. I really hope that season 3 turns this around next year, but I'm not holding my breath.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed