The Sun (2005) Poster

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
31 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Hirohito the Simple Gardener
frankiehudson26 September 2005
The beginning of this film is exceptionally dull, half an hour of Hirohito - in an excellent, intriguing performance by Issey Sogata - pottering around, surrounded by his overbearing courtiers. His servants appear genuinely awed by the God-like emperor and can hardly bow low enough to show their total subservience. Everything - buttoning a jacket, placing a knife and fork in his hands - is undertaken for the emperor.

In a curious similarity to Hitler's last days in the chaotic bunker in the recent film Downfall (2005), Hirohito is confined to his own bunker beneath his imperial palace in Tokyo. Yet, there is little sign of the war down here, just a series of dull, ill-lit yet nicely-furnished rooms, all wooden panelling and seemingly very quiet, in the aftermath of the atomic bombs. The strange thing is the almost entirely Westernised clothes and total banality of the emperor's life. Hirohito wanders around like an Edwardian gentleman, attired in exquisite tailoring, all top hat and fine suits, like Bertie Wooster without the humour.

Hirohito studies Darwin and makes a few minor reflections on his role in Japanese imperialism leading up to the war, and the nature of the beast, yet he is basically Chauncey Gardiner (Peter Selles) in the film Being There (1979), a sort of idiot-savant set free into a world of which he has little or no understanding. You just can't believe that Hirohito had any serious role in the whole affair.

Continuing the Darwinist motif, there are little surrealist sequences, dream-like glimpses into Hirohito's mind, with strange flying fish bombers and so forth. In these sections, the film's like a sort of Salvador Dali/Luis Buenuel/Hirohito war and bombing comb. This reminds me of the brilliant Terence Mallick film, The Thin Red Line (1998), with several US troops under-going similar experiences in an island paradise during the terrible war in the Pacific.

This is why I think the film works. The first meeting of Hirohito and MacArthur - in effect, the new emperor of Japan - is full of tension, a clash of two cultures, both incredibly nervous of each other. The two men start bonding and in one incredible moment of film, MacArthur and Hirohito have a sort of cigar kiss, the former lighting the emperor's cigar while puffing on his own, both engaged, head-to-head. It's like they're exchanging the fumes of victory and defeat. The embers. It is like an antidote to Bill Clinton's normal use of cigars.

They get along just fine, like Laurel and Hardy Go to Tokyo, or something. Or Will Hay, for British readers.

Did Hirohito really speak English? In one moment, Hirohito - in true Chauncey Gardiner fashion - goes into the garden for his first-ever photo-shoot. The photographers are squabbling amongst themselves over terms and conditions while, in the background, this peculiar, be-suited gentleman wanders around tending his roses. He proves to be quite a star, however, influences as he is by the American film stars he so idolises.
25 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Historically not accurate, still remarkable
shusei3 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I think "Solntse" the best of Sokurov's recent trilogy about political leaders of totalitarian regime.

In fact, we can see that only one of them is about "political leader of totalitarian regime"--the first film about Hitler. Lenin in the second film is depicted as betrayed idealist with some nobility, and the last film is about the victim of his "Divinity" imposed on him by Japanese prewar regime.Emperor Hirohito will be a very difficult figure for any challenger to dramatize his life. He was educated as "living God"--religious symbol of Japanese Nation and as a representative of civilized(in many sense Westernized)royal family at the same time. And he played these roles for many years.

This film is remarkable not only in its completeness of images and dialogs,which we Japanese people can accept without felling of strangeness, but also in its insight into the main character--Emperor. There are some episodes historically not accurate, probably intended chronological distortion, which is typical for some other films of the authors(Sokurov and Arabov).But the essence of this work is made clear by this.It tells in purely cinematographic way the mental process of Empeor towards denial of the half of his identity-- Divinity and the symbol of Unity of Japan. Maybe Emperor's aura is a little mystified by introducing his American admirer--adjutant of Macathur(apparently played by Russian actor).
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
choice of actors
bitherwack1 June 2007
I like Ogata in most all he does. But I think his casting here is a mistake. He is excellent at pulling out the one or two things of a type to set up a humorous caricature. He is an excellent comedian. I think, though, that as an impressionist rather than an actor, he played his impersonation a little too broadly. (It may be because Ogata does a lot of stage work, and had trouble toning down for the camera.) Having personally met the Emperor Showa in 1985, I can say with some confidence that though the twitching lips are an attribute, it was not as pronounced as Ogata plays it, less conscious, and more a condition of advanced age. (Hence overdone for playing someone in his 40's.)

Another point of contention I have is with the script. There are quite a few moments when Ogata orders his servants to do something; but with the subservient plea "--kudasai". In the first half of the 20th century, the Japanese language was still exceedingly rank conscious. Even a commoner would use a condescending verb form for a request to a subordinate, whether the subordinate was a wife, a servant or an employee. It is even more strange to imagine the fawning servants enduring a request spoken by the Emperor from a linguistic position of submission. Courtly language is quite different from colloquial Japanese, and one instance we have of this is from his first radio transmission in which the Emperor used the personal pronoun 'Chin'.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nothing
kosmasp11 August 2010
This is a very minimalistic effort. A movie where it seems nothing much happens and which moves along so slow, even snails would be annoyed. So if go into the movie expecting something fast, with fancy camera work (it's great camera work and the set/costume design is superb), where the camera brings in an action level, you'd be mistaken.

But what you do get, is a wonderfully crafted story, with exceptional acting. And while this is a Russian movie, it plays in Japan and has Japanese values written all over it. While it could be described as boring, I really liked every little bit of it. The stillness and ambiguity, the main character "fighting" to maintain a status. The cruel treatment he seems to be getting by some and of course the clash of the cultures. Subtle, sublime and very well done.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An elegant film on a small budget
comg10 September 2005
I've never watched Russian Ark, Moloch or Taurus by Alexander Sokurov, but this was a real gem of a film and I will be keeping an eye out for other works by Sokurov. This is a film which captures the humanity of the Japanese Emperor Hirohito in the subsequent defeat of Nazi Germany. The role of Hirohito is played by Issei Ogata who makes a tremendous performance as the last Meiji Emperor, who comes across as a rather fallible and tolerant emperor. He struggles with the Japanese defeat and how to best deal with General MacArthur played by Robert Dawson.

Overall , I would give this film a 10/10 for the simple reason that the cinematic takes are absolutely breathtaking. The movie is engaging from the very beginning and Sokurov's portrayal of the ailing emperor inside an underground bunker requires tremendous talent and fantasy. Furthermore, I also liked the way Sokurov did not focus on the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; I feel this would undermined the whole purpose of the film, which is biographical. On the negative side, however, I was rather unimpressed by the role of MacArthur, I felt it was a weak role and did not live to the Great General. Also, the GI's were pretty awful.

But it remains impressive , I highly recommend it!
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
SInce the history is inaccurate, how accurate is the psychology
prekdahl21 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I would have given this film a higher rating based on the acting, concept, and mood, but I think that it is historically inaccurate. The film attempts a sort of dream like examination of the personality of Japanese Emperor Hirohito (Emperor during WWII), and the distance between his personality and his role in Japan. However, at the beginning of the film, Hirohito is meeting with his military who are saying that they will never surrender, and he agrees. This meeting in the film is happening after the Atomic bomb was dropped and American soldiers were already landed in Japan, almost into Tokyo itself. If I remember my history correctly, Hirohito broke the deadlock in the Japanese military, and was responsible for the decision for Japan to surrender. Also,this decision was made before Americans landed in Japan. I have read that the director of the film, Sokurov, has said that he is not aiming at historical accuracy in his films. But it seems to me that the real interest of this film is that it might be an "accurate", if subjective, reading of Hirohito's personality. If the film misrepresents such significant knowledge and personal action of Hirohito as this, how can we trust any of its representations about what Hirohito was like?
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A great film
Chris Knipp17 November 2005
Sokurov's haunting recreation of how Emperor Hirohito spent the last hours before the Japanese surrender, this is a miraculous work, and it provided the most powerful aesthetic and emotional experience of the 2005 New York Film Festival, whose official selections were not lacking in depth and fine film-making.

"The Sun" depicts a man who knows very well what is going on but lives in a cocoon, in a state of detachment and ineffectuality that becomes strangely heartrending. Issey Ogata's performance as the Emperor easily competes for hypnotic intensity with Bruno Ganz's Hitler in the German film "Downfall" -- but with a very different sort of bunker and a very different kind of man: a silent, immaculate country house with a few faithful servants in attendance; a small, frail but upright and dignified personage who can easily explain the causes of the Japanese defeat to his general staff but has never learned to dress himself or open a door. Even on this day he is more comfortable browsing through photos of his family and American movie stars, dictating notes on marine biology, and writing poetry. Despite the disgrace, he is selflessly happy that peace has come. He inks a brush to write a statement to his absent son, but instead drafts a few verses about the weather.

Later he is taken to see Eisenhower, and then brought back again to dine with the general. He enjoys the wine and the meat and has his first taste of a Havana cigar. The Americans conclude that the Emperor is like a child. "What's it like being a living god?" Ike asks. And speaking, to the dismay of the Japanese interpreter, in perfect English, Hirohito says, "What can I tell you? You know, it is not easy being Emperor." These are just a few details in a film rich in telling ones. Simply enumerating them can't explain this film's slow, cumulative emotional wallop -- or the lovely, fantastic, dreamlike landscape images toward the end. This film about one of modern history's most humiliating defeats is a stunning triumph.

"The Sun" demonstrates unmistakably that Andrei Sokurov is one of the world's great filmmakers.
27 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A hard viewing but psychologically interesting for some
yahin14 March 2005
Another part of Sokurov's "totalitarian" sequence, this is devoted to Japanese WW II-time Emperor Hirohito and his farewell to the old good times of imperial Japan and painful entry into new after-war realities of defeated Japan rising to "democracy" and subject to America's "civilizing".

Compared to the dictators previously depicted by Sokurov (Hitler and Lenin), Hirohito appears the least dictatorial: he sometimes is felt like a "hostage" of the desire to defend the country's own pass of development against the "corroding" influx of Western "plebeian" culture, the desire which led Japan into the fascist "axis" and determined its defeat when the old traditions of relying on the soldiers' spirit and honour and not technical power, and despising non-Japanese as barbarians did not justify themselves.

The film is a hard viewing even for art-house fans because of obscure (probably psychologically justified) coloring and virtually no exterior action. All the action is psychological depicting the way the Emperor comes to reality and to realizing (and publicly declaring) that he is a man, not God, and taking the disgrace of defeat on himself to save his country.

Overall, 7/10.
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Of course, the Emperor's life is not an easy one
LunarPoise2 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Sokurov's evocative account of Hirohito's fall from Heaven is mesmerizing in terms of narrative structure, photography and Ogata's performance. Ogata quite literally puts his life on the line by taking this role; he clearly feeds off that tension to provide a quite stunning portrayal of one of the 20th century's leading figures, one whose absence from artistic portrayal stands in juxtaposition to the pivotal role he played in leading his country through world war, nuclear destruction, to revival as an economic superpower. Think about Hitler, Mussolini, Churchill, Eisenhower, Stalin and Hirohito. Which one do you feel least able to describe? Sokurov and Ogata play on that enigmatic image. Ogata chooses to take the physical aspects of Hirohito that we know - the twitches, stiffness, child-like expressions - and amplify them to heighten the unreality of the situation, complementing Sokurov's other- worldly sepia tinted grainy photography.

The film does not strive for historical accuracy. It is unlikely that Macarthur's interpreter would have been a nationalist zealot. The casting of Robert Dawson as Macarthur is the film's biggest failing - the man is more wooden than Sherwood forest. And the American photographers look like American students studying in Russia trying to earn a few rubles as extras - which is probably what they are. It is a shame that budget limitations and casting errors detract from what could have been a sublime artistic achievement. Ogata, in particular, should have been served better for the riveting performance he gives here.

The Sun polemically considers what might have happened when God became man. No future attempt to portray the life of Hirohito on celluloid can avoid referring to this film. Few will emulate it. The genius here is in exploring Hirohito the man and his inadequate attempts to comprehend the momentous events that engulf him at the end of the war. By staying with him, and not pausing to bow one's head before Hiroshima, Nagasaki, or the fire-bombing of Tokyo, Sokurov provides a glimpse of a man who remains, even after his death in the late eighties, a complete enigma. The transition from deity to man happens briefly, but palpably, at the end, when Hirohtio the figurehead is shown to also be husband and father. The Sun is food for thought on a much neglected man.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Majestic portrayal of the unknown Emperor of Japan of WW2
ksundstrom4 June 2009
Director Sokourov's portrayal of the Japanese Emperor during the time of his capitulation to America is spellbinding and possibly unique. Japanese civilization and especially its culture from warriors to sex and love are totally different to western culture. Issei HiroHito who plays the role of the Emperor is majestic in human manner and mannerisms, spanning glimpses of ancient customs of etiquette, the significance of poetry and the new world of science (HiroHito's passion being marine biology). Most significant is his surprising awareness of the fateful decisions he has to take at the end of WW2 in order to bring Japan into the next era. Long lasting peace is his fervent vision. One is surprised to learn that he hardly participatedin the making of the military decisions: unaware of the attack on Pearl Harbour, for example. Luckily for Japan, MacArthur knew something about Japan and its rigid etiquette and sensitive non military culture, having been there before the war. Lukily for Japan, MacArthur decided on getting to know his opponent in person to person meetings with the Emperor before pronouncing judgment on whether the Emperor was guilty of being leader of the war or just an innocent person kept away from the important decisions. The two meetings between MacArthur and HiroHito when HirorHito spoke English (he said he also spoke other languages), were non-political and dealt mostly with personal matters of family and leisure interests. These discussions, subtly developed in the film, convinced MacArthur that HiroHito was innocent and that HiroHito could be a unifying force for a new Japan. (This positive attitude by America through MacArthur can be contrasted by the exact opposite of the Versaille Peace Treaty at the end of WW1 vindictively pushed through by the French and which proved to be, as Woodrow Wilson feared, a cause for further troubles in Europe, finally WW2.) What makes the film outstanding is Issei Ogata's sensitive and convincing portrayal of the Emperor concerned with human interests, who is considered by the Japanese as a God. Secondly, the decorum of the Japanese, so rigid to exclude all compromise. Luckily for the Japanese HiroHito found a way to compromise. Also the film's special color range suggested more undertones than either a documentary or a book. Essential to see to understand.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hmmmm ...
ottaky5 September 2005
I've waited 24 hours before reviewing The Sun in the hope that a day to reflect might produce some kind of insight into what I saw - unfortunately, that hasn't happened, so you're stuck with the same thoughts that I had yesterday.

If you're looking for some enlightenment into what goes through the mind of a god soon to be demoted to a mere mortal in the face of a crushing national defeat, you won't find much to help you out in The Sun. Unless you're one of those people who believes that those thoughts would have something to do with crabs.

So, what do you get in return for a ticket? The film itself is very dark - and by that I mean that there's very little light. Shot almost exclusively indoors with very little additional lighting the result is an effect that would be interesting in a single photograph, but becomes tiresome over the course of 110 minutes. Yes, it builds atmosphere, but it just became irritating to me.

Issei Ogata as Hirohito is very good, but his inability to keep his mouth closed and immobile when he's not speaking seems to be an embellishment too far (unless the real Hirohito actually did this). Most of the Japanese actors are excellent, in fact.

Robert Dawson as MacArthur is terrible - calling him wooden would be to slander actual wood.

The soundtrack is quite bizarre but, for the most part, works well to create a background tension which the script can't quite manage. If you've ever wondered what a segment of Wagner's Ring Cycle would sound like juxtaposed against the beat of a radio's heterodyne, this could be your film. Sometimes the only sound is the ticking of the clock - which is probably intentional again but ....

I realise that I'm not building a very good case for going to see this film, but the truth of the matter is that, as a whole, I found that I couldn't help myself from watching despite its flaws.

Watching this film is an interesting experience, but it will probably only appeal to you if you enjoy something that's quite challenging to sit through and you can forgive a script that ignores what could be interesting directions in favour of exploring the mundane.
12 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A brilliant movie
pakrashv7 September 2005
It's been a week that I have seen The Sun. I would say that this is one of the best movies I have seen in recent times. Initially I went to watch the film with some qualms about Sokurov's over-ambitious (so I thought) project. 5 minutes into the film and I knew that I was watching a real good movie- hat's off. The subtle interplay of characters, the thought process of the emperor, the surroundings, the Americans will seem all too real. The film is slow in terms of change of events- but you will never feel it. The emperor Hirohita ad the human Hirohita and the obscure line between them is fabulous. It is like going through a brief period of emperors life right in front of him. Mark my words, you'll like it! Vikram
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Couldn't be better. That's not to say it's terribly good, mind...
atwarwiththebarmyarmy5 August 2006
There's an awful lot right with this film. Beautifully shot, well written, and an array of fine acting is topped off by an outstanding central performance by Issei as the Emperor whose world is slipping irretrievably out of his grasp. I really believe that, if you want a film about the last days of Imperial Divinity, you can't go far wrong with this.

But is that really what you want? The story of the Emperor's changing world is not the story of the demise of Imperial Japan. The comparisons with Downfall are inevitable, but while Hitler dragged the entire world through unthinkable horrors, Hirohito merely watched others do it on his behalf. As a result, the film seems sadly removed from reality. Which, of course, is a true reflection of events - but it doesn't make for a good film.

All in all, a near-flawless study of a rather boring subject. Which is a great shame.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
awful, self absorbed, long winded
elfinadrawer28 March 2010
this is an awful film; it could have been condensed into about 30 minutes. it was long, boring, and slow, with nothing interesting or compelling about it. there was bad acting on the part of everyone other than whoever played hirohito, especially whoever played macarthur and all the other Americans. furthermore, hirohito is such an unappealing personality--ugly, awkward, mouth spasms--that it was downright painful to watch two hours of him floundering about, accurate as the portrayal may be.

i believe this film is intended to be a deep meditation on power's end, but its flaws greatly outnumber its virtues. it failed to convey an interesting story or to entertain me in any way.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A God with stomach ulcers
Asa_Nisi_Masa23 May 2007
Very powerful film-making, which leaves you feeling very unsettled. Through the minutae of his days and his every gesture, nervous tick and grimaces, it describes the last days of the living God, the Emperor of Japan. It's already perfectly clear to everyone that Japan is on its knees and the war has been won by mere mortals. It's perfectly clear, and yet the nation apparently still needs to know that its Emperor is a God. Superficially, the movie could be compared to Der Untergang, The Downfall, in that it shows a previous icon of absolute power cooped up in his bunker, days before his complete demise. The mood of these two movies is so very different, though - there was life stirring in among the ashes of Oliver Hirschbiegel's Berlin, still. There is seemingly no life left at all in the devastation surrounding the Japanese Emperor's palace and bunker. You see so little of the physical destruction, possibly because the movie had a small-ish budget and they couldn't afford complete reconstructions, but you feel it everywhere. Never before have sea creatures preserved in formaldehyde been more eerie. I was blown away by the sequences of the catfish (a recurrent subject of traditional Japanese ink drawings) swimming in the sky like bomber planes over a nuclear-war devastated nightmarish landscape. All the way through, I loved the use of classical music, seemingly distant and distorted - Bach and Wagner, and others. Every little gesture and detail in the movie matters, every camera angle and perspective is carefully planned. Some might call it slow, but to be honest I was never bored. Thankfully, the movie is also completely non-judgmental of anyone. Despite the odd wooden performance, I recommend this to anyone who is used to quality world cinema.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
avoiding sunset
dromasca19 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
'The Sun' which has as central character emperor Hirohito is the last film in a trilogy of Russian director Alexandr Sokurov, the previous two films being dedicated to Lenin and Hitler. Three very different characters that have put their print on the history of the 2oth century. It's an interesting combination, but as I have not seen the other two films I cannot comment about it.

The two other films that 'The Sun' immediately reminds are 'Der Untergang' and Bertolucci's 'last Emperor'. As in the excellent German film dedicated to Hitler's last days much of the first part of 'The Sun' happens in a bunker, the bunker where the emperor hides at the end of the war. The feeling of claustrophobia and personal isolation is present here as well, although Hirohito seems to be different than Hitler in understanding and acknowledging the dimensions of the tragedy that his rule has inflicted on his people. However, as in 'The Last Emperor' his personal background, the ceremonial life he was educated for and the divinity status that he is supposed to adopt make him severely unfit to face reality. It is his the process of reconciliation with reality that is the central theme of this film.

As in 'Untergang' the film lies to a large extend on the shoulders of the lead actor. As Bruno Ganz, Issei Ogata does a wonderful job here in bringing to screen an image of Hirohito which is full of complexity, with a tragic, historic but also human dimension. Ogata's Hirohito fights with personal despair and guilt, and also with the limits of his own education and understanding of the world in order to gain the strength to do what he believes is best for his country and for his people. Faced with the possible consequences of the decisions he made during the war, he tries to find justification and refuge in the traditional Japanese approach to the world. The skill of the director is to make us understand the thinking process that led to his reconciliation with the victorious power and the rest of the world, eventually opening Japan again to the reintegration in the international arena.

I liked less the way the relations with the American and the discussions with MacArthur are presented in the film - relative to the complex presentation of the Japanese side they seem simplistic and even to some extent they tend to slide into caricature. It's a pity, as this lost dimension is really what separates 'The Sun' from being a really memorable movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth Seeing, if You Don't Mind Open Mouthed Actors with a twitch to their lips !!!
garnetdurham23 February 2006
Robert Dawson as MacArthur was a poor choice. He looks nothing like the real General, neither in height nor stature. In a famous photo of the period, MacArthur towers over Hirohito, even in His top hat, this framing suited the General's ego, and was not re-created in this film. Noticeably absent also, was the Generals favorite corncob pipe in this film, something the General was never without throughout World War 2.

Other than that, the movie was a fascinating look at the Emperor's life, albeit from a very short time span. I thought this movie would have been much more interesting had it covered the start of the World War 2 with the Emperor receiving His Banzai's on His White Horse and seeming invincibility, to His ultimate fall from from a living God to That of a mortal being and a broken ruler.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Emperor is All-too Human
field-jessel28 March 2010
"The Sun" was a good way to introduce ourselves to the minimalist, detail-obsessed films of Alexander Sokurov -- so thanks to Minnesota Film Arts for showing it at St. Anthony Main, February 2010.

Sokurov's Emperor Hirohito is not only humanized in this film, he finds redemption, if in a limited way that leaves him assailable for his true weakness: weakness of will, anxiety of spirit, and dreamy preference for leisurely study and cool contemplation. Hirohito is a true nobleman where his job called for either a savior or a butcher.

The actor who plays Hirohito has an amazing technique. All of his facial features and especially his mouth and front teeth are applied very deliberately to create the sense of a careful, intelligent, and ultimately ordinary man.

What to say of Sokurov's unique vision? It's something like a documentary of daily habits, a virtuosic sequencing of mundane and ritual behavior -- eating breakfast, reading a book, chatting with his servants, waiting for General McArthur to return, greeting his wife -- sequences that contain turning points. A surprisingly naive, yet resigned man faces up to his life, thus learning to really live in the end.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
not for every taste but an interesting piece of historical fiction
Buddy-5120 December 2010
Alexander Sokurov's austere, moody and claustrophobic chamber piece, "The Sun," takes place in Tokyo in 1945, just as the victorious American forces are overtaking the city. The focus of the film is on Emperor Hirohito (believed by his subjects to be a direct descendant of the Sun goddess Amaterasu ) who, holed up in a bunker in the royal palace, agonizes over how such an ignominious fate could have befallen his nation and his people – and the part he himself may have played in bringing that outcome about.

Hirohito spends much of the first half of the film engaging in deep introspection and personal recrimination, blaming himself for having placed too much faith in the power of the Empire and for relying too heavily on the enthusiasm of the soldiers rather than properly equipping the army. Meanwhile, he pores over old family photo albums as well as pictures of glamorous Hollywood stars of the time, suggesting that he clearly doesn't despise all things American, even if that nation has become the cause of his downfall.

In the second half of the movie, Hirohito finds himself under house arrest, where his American captors ply him with wine and chocolate bars as they negotiate the terms of his surrender. Then he's brought before General MacArthur himself, who treats the defeated emperor with outward politeness but inward condescension and dismissiveness. The result is a subtle little game of cat-and-mouse in which two of the great figures of their time vie for position and power – both personal and diplomatic.

A largely fictionalized, impressionistic account of historical events, "The Sun" is definitely an acquired taste. Its subdued tone, spare settings and desultory pacing may be off-putting to some in the audience, and the acting by the American performers is amateurish in the extreme. But there's a haunting quality to the film as well, as a man once convinced of his own infallibility, divinity and immortality is forced to face the fact that, like the rest of humanity, he has feet of clay – and finds what a truly liberating and unburdening thing that can be in the long run.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Atmospheric, humanistic portrayal of a powerful leader in wartime
tomgillespie200218 May 2011
Similar to Oliver Hischbiegel's Downfall, released a year earlier, The Sun follows Emperor Hirohito during the final days of World War II. While American soldiers invade the land after dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Emperor remains holed up in the bunker of his palace, existing in a kind of daze. He wanders the hallways, followed by his servants who hang on his every word and action, awaiting his instructions. He quietly ponders the situation and attempts to negotiate a peace treaty with his advisors, wondering what effect it will have on his legacy. General Douglas MacArthur calls for him to dine with him, and the two almost share a strange bond while discussing politics, determining the Emperor's fate and smoking cigars.

Director Aleksandr Sokurov, who was responsible for the hypnotic Russian Ark and criminally under-seen Alexandra, adopts a similar style to that of the former. The digital image glides along the steel corridors of the bunker, following Hirohito's every move. The darkness and the grain of the image allowing a more grounded feel to the proceedings. This way, it feels less like a period piece based on real events, and places you more in the time. It's a similar approach to that taken by Michael Mann in the over-rated Public Enemies. Though Michael Mann's almost emotionless biography of John Dillinger used it in a desperate attempt to look cool and edgy (something that Mann seems to do with every new film he does - surprising given the effortless cool of the likes of Heat and Manhunter - anyway...), here Sokurov adopts the style to create a very real atmosphere.

The almost constant soundtrack, too, adds to the atmosphere of the piece. As the Emperor slowly paces the corridors, quietly discusses matter with his board and quietly reflects on his actions, the music and camera-work gave me the overall impression of doom. Not that the film is heading that way, I felt that it more represented the internal struggle of the Emperor, where his fate is seemingly out of his hands, and his country could be facing ruin. Two of the largest cities in the country have been obliterated by the U.S., who are now crossing their borders and invading. Being the Emperor, he is of the belief that he is a God. Is this the legacy of a God? What will his people remember him for?

I can't end the review without mentioning the computer generated sequence that breaks up the film. Dazed and delirious after being taken ill, the Emperor sits open mouthed at the edge of his bed, imagining scores of giant flying fish soaring through the air. The country below them lies in smoky ruin, and the fish begin to drop more bombs, the sounds of the fish's 'engines' groaning terribly. The fish by the way, just to put it into context, represent Hirohito's love for marine biology, which he persists in researching even as the Americans invade. It's a brave, interesting move in the film. It initially jarred with the quiet, controlled drama that unfolds before, but it becomes an interesting and unnerving experimental set-piece.

A cold, tightly-directed biography that cares less about the politics of the time, and more with the humanistic aspect of a powerful ruler in a troubled time, with a mesmerising lead performance by Issei Ogata.

www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
*sighs, purses lips*
wandereramor14 June 2012
The Sun is a domestic film of quiet heartbreak that just happens to be about the ordained leader of a nation. It chronicles the last days of Hirohito's reign in a sympathetic but not apologist manner, dealing in subtlety and silences. Sokurov not only manages to make this elegiac instead of boring but fills the screen with indelible images.

Almost as important as Sokurov to The Sun's success is Issei Ogata. Ogata portrays Hirohito as a curious mixture of wisdom and naiveté. He acts with his whole body, from the prim minimized way he stands to the strange tremblings of his lips. Halfway through the film Douglas MacArthur proclaims that Hirohito is like a child, but this isn't quite accurate. He's a man who's developed stunted, like a flower twisting towards the sun, and often seems to have a baffling idea of what the outside world is like. He more resembles a hermit than an emperor, and this may be Sokurov's ultimate statement about power: that as much as it allows you to control others, it also isolates and insulates you from them, and ultimately makes you as strange and pathetic as the old man in this film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A dry, tedious, depiction of Hirohito.
bryanmillsfist4 May 2013
As an WWII buff, I was intrigued when I saw this film pop up on my Netflix recommence list. Alas, I ought to have taken the time to beforehand to look up the director. Alesandr Sokurov made the dreadful "Russian Ark". This film, while not nearly as bad as "Ark" or Malick's horrendous "Thin Red Line", suffers from a limp, aimless, script that is augmented by equally limp, wooden acting.

The Americans in this film are a collection of stereotypes posing as characters. Richard Dawson in particular is awful. He appears to suffer from a case of macrocephaly which is seriously distracting. His massive head--quite unlike what MacArthur had-- makes him look like a mad scientist in an army uniform. His acting, the apposite of Tommy Lee Jones portrayal of MacArthur in "Emperor", is lifeless and quite unlike Douglas MacArthur.

Issei does a solid enough job of portraying the Emperor. Who can pretend to accurately a man who is seen as a God and is kept largely out of the public eye? Unlike MacArthur, the actor here had little to go on in a character study.In view of this any actor who attempts to portray such a mysterious man has to be given a benefit of the doubt. That said, this is no equal to Ganz's brilliant portrayal of Hitler. Ganz put on one of the great acting performances of all time--at least the equal of Daniel Day-Lewis' Lincoln.

I have one final critique and this goes for "Emperor" as well. For some reason when people make movies of the Pacific Theater they mention the A-bombs, but never the great many atrocities the Japanese committed in their 8 years of war. The Japanese were, in fact, the first country to employ WMD in WWII when they used bombs filled with bubonic plague on the Chinese. These weapons were developed by a special unit call Unit 731'. This unit committed horrors that matched those of Mengele and the Nazis. Then we have the Bataan Death March, the Rape of Nanking, and the general brutal occupations of Asian countries. The Japanese did far more than bomb Pearl Harbor. Ask the Chinese, who lost some 15 million citizens to Japanese aggression. Aggression that actually stretches back to 1931.(Even though the Sino-Japanese War did not officially begin until July of 1937.) To not mention Japanese barbarism and aggression on such a large scale is to akin to omitting the Holocaust when discussing the Nazis.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Orthodox and unorthodox
Continuo-ity9 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Excellent film - very strange, with a minimal script and unusual colour.

One point misunderstood by other reviews - Hirohito had that movement of the mouth. The Japanese friend I saw it with was bowled over by the portrayal of Hirohito.

Great score, really adds to film - in other words not your typical Hollywood string slush-fest.

The most interesting point for me related to a documentary on Hirohito I'd seen lately which contested this view of him being a helpless figure in the face of the military (though the government scene seemed to show him in control) and almost childlike. The evidence supplied suggested that he was very much in control, and his renunciation was solely done to get out of being held accountable. The most telling scene in this regard was the very last - the unspoken accusation is that he should have been the one to commit hari-kiri, not the announcer (? I think!).

Highly recommended - but in the cinema! I'm not sure the colour would work as well on a TV.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Sun: Script, Direction, Lead: all mesmerising, in cohesive whole.
Joseph_Gillis8 January 2019
My introduction to the works of Aleksandr Sokurov was by way of a friend's recommendation of his 'Mother and Son', which I consider visual poetry of the highest order; I'd been somewhat wary of viewing his 'Russian Ark' because of the emphasis that too many reviewers were placing on its technical accomplishments. I can agree on those, but there's so much more to the film, which is probably the least of the three Sokurovs that I've now seen.

Because of their subject matter - the last days of a confined-to-bunker defeated World War II Axis-state 'Emperor' - this film has been recommended as a good companion-piece to Oliver Hirschbiegel's (overlong) 'Downfall', but by doing so would only expose the latter film (whose merits largely derive from Bruno Ganz' lead performance) to its inadequacies. 'The Sun' is a VASTLY superior film, and about far, far more than just acting performance.

For me, its impossible to assess the respective contributions to the film's overall quality of script, direction, and of lead performance beyond noting each's overall excellence. I'd LIKE to know how much of Yuri Arabov's script remains in the finished 'product' - and to what extent, if any, Sokurov changed it, but then I'd also like to know how much direction Issey Ogata obtained. But I don't NEED to know. At the very least, given that director Sokurov also acted as director of photography, the visuals are worthy of the director of 'Mother and Son'. And, while usually I'm wary of a film's production design, here, also, EVERYTHING fits, whether we're talking about the colour schemes to fit a particular mood, or the opulence in which the Emperor is received, by his conquering nation's representative General MacArthur, which might reflect equally on the character of the General.

The portrait of Hirohito which the film suggests is of a man who had greatness (or more accurately deification) thrust upon him: an all-too-human man - as evidenced by his secretive lingering over his personal collection of photos of Hollywood screen goddesses ; a man who perhaps delighted in comparisons made of him with Charlie Chaplin; a man who loved his wife and family; who liked to occupy his brain and mind to the fullest, even when his subjects preferred him not to, for it not being required of a deity; a man who may not have involved himself enough in affairs of State and warfare to the extent, perhaps, that he should have, and that his intelligence and apparent compassion warranted; a man who perhaps had something of the child about him, who welcomed the release from the stultifying repression his birthright had subjected him to, more than he would have liked his subjects - or General Macarthur, even - to know.

With my limited knowledge of Japanese history - which I intend to rectify - I don't know how accurate such a portrait is, but its brilliantly, cohesively presented.

A cinematic Masterpice

Side notes: 1)Its unfortunate that the shape of actor Robert Dawson's head (especially his forehead) kept reminding me of a (benevolent) alien in 1950's sci-fi classic, This Island Earth' (Of course this may have been intentional, if there was considerable 'makeup' involved.) 2).In his DVD production notes the director stated that he considered Japanese people as being closer in nature to English people than to the peoples of their East Asian nations neighbours. Watching a perhaps deliberately comical interlude of exaggerated 'After you, Claude' deference, between the Emperor and a visiting scientist, one could well believe it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The fate of the emperor
Zhorzhik-Morzhik8 March 2020
"The Sun" is the third part of the epic tetralogy of Aleksandr Sokurov, which also includes "Hammer", "Taurus" and "Faust". Japan, the last days of the second world war. Atomic bombs destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, complete surrender. What will it do, what decisions will the Leader of the nation - the emperor make - to save and unite the nation, to raise it from its knees?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed