Haunted House (Video 2004) Poster

(2004 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Worse Student Film I've ever seen....
makeupnfilms27 December 2004
OK OK... one of the worse student films I've ever seen.

I can't believe something this bad got distributed. To the distribution company: If you're going to distribute STUDENT FILMS, PUT A WARNING ON IT!!!

I actually miss the couple of bucks I paid to rent this film.... maybe that's why I'm spending 5 more minutes to the already 88 minutes of my life wasted on this film to write about it so others don't have to suffer the boredom I did....

The acting was HORRIFIC! The directing was FLAT! The lighting was so AWFUL IT WAS FUNNY. To the DP: Repeat with me...Key Light!!! The writing was SHAMEFUL! The sound...did they even have a sound guy?????? I didn't check the credits.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I want my money back!
mhaun-120 February 2005
Listen up, Conrad John. Since you were the writer, director and producer of "Haunted House," I'm holding you personally responsible for this crap-tastic film. I expect you to immediately mail me the $4 I spent renting this poorly made piece of schlock.

It's not my fault. I got suckered in by the professional looking DVD cover. I like a good cheesy horror flick from time to time. I thought "Haunted House" would have a few cheap scares.

Oh, there were some scary things in this movie, alright. Let's start with the acting...if you can call it that. I suppose you could say the cast was hampered by the lack of a intelligent script - or any script for that matter. Of course, bad lighting, bad sound and horrendous direction don't help matters.

Jesus, there wasn't even a plot. How hard is it to come up with some scares??? If you can't come up with anything original, at least take the time to rip something off.

Screw you, Conrad John!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This is a bad bad movie
Glyde Stick23 December 2004
Warning: Spoilers
This is a terribly lame (and very late) attempt to cash in on The Blair Witch Project. Two wanna-be film makers want to send four "actors" into a supposedly haunted house armed with flashlights and camcorders so they can put together a Blair Witch-like movie.

Unbeknownst to the actors (but suspected), the film makers have the house rigged with bad special effects and hidden cameras to capture the mortal terror they are sure to suffer. Unbeknownst to the film makers and the actors, the house is really haunted by the ghost some unknown man who was apparently murdered in the house in 1888. Painfully known to anyone who has watched this film is that there are no scares, no chills, and laughable special effects.

There is absolutely nothing in this film that hasn't been done before (and done better) which leaves the gratuitous two seconds of nudity as the best part of the film. And those two seconds are certainly not worth the rental fee or the waste of 88 minutes of your life!

Bottom line: bad plot + bad acting + no scares = BAD MOVIE
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This is the worse movie ever.. but a few good parts
flyund18 November 2005
I have to say this is the worst movie ever. However, there are some cool parts. First, the guy in the window, the door slamming shut by itself and of course the flashing by the girls nice boobs!!! Therefore, I gave it a 3 but if you are desperate in looking at this film then either borrow it for free!!! or rent it on your unlimited rental plan at your nearby video store. Don't pay money to watch this!!! I wonder if they will take a return if I say the disc don't work ?

Basically the story line is 4 college students get recruited to work on an independent film. During the filming process, things get crazy. A local legend of a dead homeowner returns to claim back his house as well as scare to "death" the trespassers.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Production Quality is Soooo Bad
demarkin15 January 2005
If you're reading this review, you were probably like me and saw an eye-catching DVD Box at your video rental store and thought it would be worth a shot. Well, the box cover of Asylum Entertainment's 'Haunted House' is the only promising part of the next 90 minutes of poor quality production you are about to witness.

This is not the first time Asylum Entertainment's box covers have caught my eye... indeed. last week, I rented 'Lady in a Box' and another movie I can;'t remember the name of. What I learned in this week is NEVER rent another movie with Asylum Entertainment in the lower back right corner.

The production quality is so horrifying, especially to view as a video production student. The camera-work, shot on prosumer digital video, is choppy and unmotivated. The lighting looks like it was shot in some studio out in California. The characters are worse than any soap opera I've seen on daytime television.

Don't waste your time...and don't encourage video rental stores like Hollywood and Blockbuster to put this crap on the shelves.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dust bin dwellers:Bad D.V.D. rental night courtesy of Asylum.
Captain_Couth7 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Haunted House (2004) is a waste of digital space upon a D.V.D. disc I have ever seen. I have watched crappy movies before but this has to be worst thing I have ever seen. This did not even resemble a movie in the least. The structure, lighting, writing, acting and direction is the pits. I cannot believe this "movie" was even distributed in a major video rental chain store. I mean I can not find one thing good to say about it. The flick was padded out to the extreme and the film makers seemed to have run out of ideas and other ways to extend the running time past seventy minutes.

The "movie" begins with some thirty something frat boys hanging outside of what appears to be a spooky "house". They seem to be reliving and old urban legend about people disappearing inside a ghost house. If you have heard the tale before it's old news (a "kid" walks in and never comes out and the frat boys come and and find him dead of fright, the boys soon fall victim to a death curse). The tale is told by a really bad film maker, he convinces his friends (A group of old teenagers) to hang out inside and outside an empty structure that looks like a cross between a barn and a large doll house. After torturing the audience with some of the worst movie making the world has ever since (I have seen Cable Access shows with better film making skills and production) they give us a cheap payoff by repeating what happened in the beginning. The movie ends with voice-overs, still pictures and rehashed footage.

They should take all the copies of this movie and bury them with the million copies of unsold E.T. Atari 2600 games out there in the New Mexico desert. Asylum should also be punished for helping to release this garbage. This movie failed all the simple logical steps that are needed to create a watchable movie. Haunted House had no acting, lame writing, terrible direction, no lighting and gutter level production values.

Avoid like the plague!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst Horror Movie......EVER!
xdjs8 February 2007
This film was soooo painful to watch that I almost had to smash the T.V. and flush the pieces down the toilet. I have been a horror fan all my life and consider myself very open-minded to student film projects, B-Films, etc. However, this piece of crap still sits steaming away in the *beep* pile (like crap does). What were they thinking? Still photos used as cut-away shots....horrible. An abandoned house with a porch light lit(very realistic). Take my advice...DO Not rent this film. After the first few minutes you will want to slash your own throat. I've seen wedding videos scarier than this. Please DO NOT contribute to the fattening of these people's wallets...please do not rent "Haunted House".
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible!
axfirexinside274 March 2005
Unfortunately, the DVD case doesn't warn you of the terrible quality of both the acting and the filming of this movie.

For over 50 percent of the movie, you cannot even see the actors. Apparently the filmmakers have never learned about lighting. They are in an unlit house at midnight, but you can't even tell where in the shot they are. Which is probably for the best, because the acting is so terrible that you're better off not seeing them. The story line isn't exactly great either.

Haunted House isn't even one of those terrible movies that you rent and laugh at because it sucks so badly. Its one of those movies where you genuinely feel cheated out of 5 bucks.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Fall infusion of crap and lame.
Zazabar22 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was the gayzor. It made me choke on stuff. I do know it was a student film, but it couldn't be any worse than if my cat directed it. The movie started off with a frat house with some awesome song playing. It kept switching from that scene over to some toy train coming close to the camera. It was quite absurd. Then it went to some stupid guys going to some house and they thought it was scary. This loser had to go into it to be accepted into their frat for asshole lickers. After the story, it went over to some crappy camera into this house of some losers and stuff was talked about. There was a director with 4 normal people who were supposed to be in a house that wasn't scary. Since it was a movie, the movie people wanted them to not know about the scary stuff so they would get quality acting. Then a guy and a girl went into the house as one guy and girl stayed outside with their horrible ad libbing skills. The movie crew found out that some scary stuff wasn't due to them and they ran away because a friend of theirs got cold. Then the guy who was outside went into the house and stayed in there for a while with some old man. Then they left. And for some reason after they all left the house, they all started dying for no reason whatsoever. The only parts that stood out was some guy saying "Be up in a minute!" and the night vision wind camera. I hate this movie and everyone who was in it. The only redeeming factor was the song called "Climbing up the stairs".
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
climbing up the stairs!
agent_squirrel21 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I just want to say something real quick before we begin. This movie shouldn't exist. If I could go back in time I would go back to the beginning of Conrad John's lineage and smite his ancestors so that he may never make a movie such that is this. I cannot even begin to describe how this movie fails on all accounts. The director makes a comment about how most of the dialogue is ad-libbed. I think most of his career is ad-libbed. And by ad-libbed I mean suck. Conrad feels the need to emphasize various aspects of the movie by showing his characters doing the same damn thing over and over again in long drawn out shots. One thing I do have to give him credit for though is that he doesn't pussyfoot around showing boobs. He just comes right out and says "lol it pretty much has to be done so we're gonna do it." Aside from that, and the awesome soundtrack, this movie has absolutely nothing going for it. It's not even cheesy, it's just over an hour of mindless whatever that will make you cry and say "What did I just watch? What is this? Where am I and why am I typing a review for it?"
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed