Cavite (2005) Poster

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
36 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Terrorism gets personalized when a Filipino émigré must free his kidnapped family by using himself as the ransom!
SONNYK_USA12 March 2006
Whatever superlative film-making skills co-director Ian Gamazon has attained over the years are quickly diminished by his average acting ability portraying 'Adam', the lead role of "Cavite." It also makes one wonder just how shallow the Filipino-American acting pool is in this country.

That said, this story is basically an extension of the Hollywood movie "Phone Booth" where a voice on the telephone forces the person on the other end to capitulate to their demands. Of course, "Cavite" takes it one step further by allowing the caller to be a well-known terrorist who not only has Adam's cellphone number but his victim's mother and sister too (after having already executed the father).

The cellphone also allows the action to travel which is technically more visually interesting than watching Colin Farrell sweat it out in one spot (a la "Phone Booth"). Although the voice on the phone purports to be Muslim terrorist leader, the political thriller elements are muted for the most part with the primary action revolving around the making audience watching Adam saunter his way through the city of Cavite (near Manila) on foot until he reaches the point of no return.

The terrorist's final request is the ultimate decision of the Adam's life: be a suicide bomber for the Abu Sayyaf and complete the mission or listen to the sound of your family being killed over the cellphone.

Of course, it'll cost you the price of admission to find out which choice he opted for, but for those not used to cinema verite this may be a hard film to watch. Almost all of the action is shot from either the Adam's POV (self-held camera) or the POV of the cameraman (also hand-held) gamely following behind him. Not for all tastes, but this low-budgeter shows you don't have to have millions of dollars to create suspense, but a better lead actor would have been worth a fortune.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Austin Movie Show review -- "original and surprising"
leilapostgrad16 July 2006
Adam, a 32-year-old Filipino security guard from San Diego, must fly home to the Philippines after learning that his father is died. He lands at the Manila airport and waits for his mother to pick him up. She never does. He hears a ringing in his bag. It's a mysterious package with a ringing cell phone (think of The Matrix when Morpheus contacts Neo for the first time). Adam picks it up, and for the next hour, an Islamic extremist (who has kidnapped his mother and sister) threatens to kill Adam's family if he doesn't follow every single order he's given. Now that's suspense.

I love that Cavite truly takes you down the streets of the Philippines, where people drink soda from a plastic bag and bet on cockfights (reminds me a lot of Mexico). Everything about this film is original and surprising. The only problems were technical (and hardly worth mentioning). One problem was the discontinuity of the sweaty shirt. Adam wears the same shirt throughout the film, and the shirt is sweatier at some points than at others. The other problem was believing that two cell phones batteries could last an entire day. Adam is constantly on the phone with his family's kidnapper, and he only runs out of battery once? I don't buy it. But I bought everything else.

Equally as original as the plot of Cavite is the story about how this indie film found it's distribution. A U.T. class on advanced film producing promoted Cavite through the 2005 SXSW Film Festival and the 2005 Los Angeles Film Festival, and thanks to a deal with Mark Cuban's "Truly Indie" distribution initiative, Cavite is now showing at a theater near you, so check it out.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Quite the admirable young independent film
oneloveall3 May 2007
Intense, and intensely low-budget, this action-suspense experimenter is one of the most effective student-like movies I've seen. Keeping true to their moniker (gorilla productions), rookie film-making team Neill Dela Llana and Ian Gamazon (also the star) show a surprising amount of skill in their hard-edged, guerrilla approach. The fast-paced thriller, also masking as edgy Philippino travelogue, traces the nervous steps Gamazon must undergo after being virtually hijacked by an unknown overseer. Playing out much in the same vein as many popular "momentum flicks" (Crank, Nick of Time etc), here these gifted newcomers instill a realism even they could not have hoped for at times.

Once thrust has been set into motion, Gamazon is shot in an alluring realism amidst the scenic decay of our title city. The technique will be a bit much for many viewers of more stable cinematography, coming across mostly as a Tony Scott with few dollars to spare. At times intrusive and overbearing, somehow the effect manages to end up complimenting this little project splendidly, working better then it should because the perfectly exploited locations and real crowds this amateur crew uses to perfection completely engage the viewer with the breakneck plot as it unfolds.

Not all is well however. We are all willing to suspend our disbelief in favor of embracing a well enough thought out piece of fiction, but the groundwork that makes for this immersed experience is not firm enough to sustain the realism it so graciously offers for the eye. Lead, and pretty much only, character Gamazon is also somewhat disappointing in the self-casting, really never breaking out of a self conscious projection and loosing himself inside the part. His puny presence could perhaps be another reason some would reject the movie, but of course those would be the action purists. Others interested in more experimental fare would do well to check out this little gem of a young team coming with a lot of adventurous film heart; the darkly appropriate political insight, as elementary as it is, becomes that much more affirmative once viewed in direct parallel to the reality of it all, making Cavite more then the frenzied action it showcases.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better than average for a Filipino movie
chrisrobin-124 December 2008
Despite being a low budget independent film, this movie is better than 80% of any commercial film made in the Philippines. Not saying much for the state of movie-making in the Philippines. I tried to watch this film knowing that it was an Indie. The whole picture is shot using hand-held video cameras. The product is a jumpy, nausea-inducing thrill ride. I honestly was sea sick halfway thru the movie. But at the same time I had to finish it because the story was actually pretty good. I thought the locations used in the film were very typical of Anytown, Philippines. Many of the comments left here seem to think that it was the film-maker's fault for having slum areas and open garbage dumps. It's funny how every Filipino hates to see these eyesores yet we do nothing about them. Particularly funny was the typical sign "Bawal Tumae Dito" (by order of mayor). We have all seen this sign one time or another, and somehow this is accepted. We need to be told what common sense should have already made known to us. The film has much more substance and direction than your typical Filipino movie, I would love to see more.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
still thrills
toyski21 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
In a movie that's just 10 days to make and with just roughly $7,000 budget, one would think there's not much to anticipate. But with creativity and an inventive idea, this movie takes micro financed film-making to the next level. Only Blair Witch Project (1999) thus far, pulled off a feat to beat under similar circumstances. With the advent of digital technology, film-making becomes more and more accessible even to dropouts Ian Gamazon and Neill dela Llana. A perfect blueprint to filmmaker hopefuls who haven't the means but the idea, "Cavite" is bold, cunning and still thrills.

A movie that will keep foreign tourists off Cavite or worse, the Philippines as a whole, "Cavite" is more than just a political thriller exposing as well the dreadful scenario in the outskirts of Metro Manila, which can also be the case in most parts of the country, projecting an image ten times worthy of what Claire Danes had to say about Manila. Though some shocking claims in the movie about the country are exaggerated and inaccurate, disturbing scenes captured reveal realities that can never be denied exist. Either Filipinos are unaware of all these or apathetic already.

Adam (Gamazon) is working at a San Diego Harbor as a Security Guard, which allows plenty of time for him to play video games and watch his belly balloon. His mother calls from the Philippines informing him his father has been killed in a bus bombing. His girlfriend in the meantime has decided to have an abortion informing him eventually. His spirits dampened, Adam takes on a flight to the Philippines via Taipei. Deciding to attend his father's funeral, Adam arrives at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport now waiting to be picked up when a cell phone rings, which he promptly realizes to be inside his backpack enveloped along with some pictures of his mother and sister who an Abu Sayyaf member on the other line says have been kidnapped by their group. Now Adam is coerced to follow his instructions or his family will be killed.

Riding a jeepney as instructed, Adam is led down the streets of Cavite City. He is introduced to the populated city slums where the toilet is just mostly anywhere, solid wastes float alongside children swimming on swamps, children ready to sell themselves for prostitution abound, and extreme poverty is sweeping. On foot traversing the lengths of the sunny city, Adam is tested in ways both silly and horrendous as to how far he can go to save his family. He later finds out the whole misfortune is to a certain extent linked to a vendetta for an act his father committed years back. In the end, Adam is made to do something he'll never forget.

The movie illustrates how severe extremist rebels can be and how far they can go just to see their plans carried out. But more than that, the movie both rationalizes and criticizes terrorism in the country. The decades old rationale communicated to support terrorism is that Mindanao belongs to Muslims and people like the terrorist caller are doing everything just to get it back to them even if it means Jihad. A lapsed Muslim himself, Adam counters with an interesting definition of Jihad: "I struggle everyday of my life to better myself. That's Jihad, not the way you do it." The filmmakers maintain some interest with the terrorist caller detailing accounts of the many atrocities to the Muslim people in Mindanao to further the rationalization of terrorism. Not really taking sides, the movie in the end shows Adam's girlfriend Dana (Dominique Gonzalez) explaining why she had to abort the baby: "…I panicked when I found out I was pregnant. You know, I'm ashamed for saying this and I'm even ashamed for thinking this, but I can't have a baby that's Muslim. I never thought I'd have to say that but I can't help the way I feel…" Unpolished, the film is no way perfect. The terrorist caller has a number of minor Tagalog grammar lapses, not to mention his accent not distinctly native, thus a bit unpersuasive to those who really speak the language. The yellow subtitles (English translations of the terrorist caller's lines) show a few errors. One is on a line in a Parokya ni Edgar song Mr. Suave, which says: "…habulin ng babae…" Translation shows: "I chase all the ladies." But all these are barely discernible to foreign viewers and can even be dismissed if one thinks about what this movie has accomplished.

Though already seen in various horror films, its edgy camera-work with no known focus is fitting, thus notable, enhancing the distress suggested by the situation. And though with the script still a bit amateurish, Gamazon somehow scores an almost convincing portrayal. Add to that the raw third world setting, which compliments the dread, presented in depressingly and dismally expository way. Above all, the message is channeled tactfully, thus swaying, going far beyond the bounds of being preachy.

"Cavite" may not be a favorite of everyone, but it's an affirmation that one doesn't need to have millions of dollars to create suspense. And it sure has actuated someone into becoming a fan. That happens to be me. (toyski.com)
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
depressing, but not bad
wrlang28 September 2006
Cavite is about Adam, an American Muslim Filipino traveling back to the Philippines to attend his father's funeral and visit his mother and sister. He finds his mother and sister are kidnapped by a Muslim terrorist faction to force Adam to do something. Adam is forced to travel around the Philippines to various places while his family is abused. Adam picks up a bomb and is told to take it to a church and leave it there as revenge for American crimes against Muslims. Adam tries to refuse, but the slime balls cut out his mother's tongue. Adam finds out his father was killed by the same terrorists in a similar bombing. As a back drop, Adam's American Christian girl friend calls him and tells him she's pregnant and having an abortion. Adam does what he's told, his family is released, and Adam goes back to America where his girl friend tells him she couldn't have a Muslim baby. As if a baby is born favoring one religion over another. While the dialog lacked some emotion, the acting made up for it to some degree. The cinematography was pretty good and you got to see some low income parts of the Philippines during Adam's travels and understand how the poor can be taken advantage of by sooth saying organizations that hand our money for cooperation. I liked the movie more for its raw surreal nature. Adam walking around in shock trying to comply with lunatics while also trying to think of a way out that doesn't kill his family.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Promising Concept That Turns Into A Dud
Patriotlad@aol.com8 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The concept for "Cavite" is not exactly new, as the storyline has been worked up before in at least one recent mainstream Hollywood movie.

The concept is simple and exciting: an adult man who is from the Philippines has been living and working in the U.S. He gets a call to inform him that he's needed, urgently, at home. On the way out of town he's beset by an emotional crisis with his Stateside girlfriend, which he tries to resolve from a telephone in the airport.

Right there I knew I was in trouble. The audio recording in this movie, at least as presented on DVD, is spotted with incomprehensible moments. The "trouble with his girl" sub-text is an important one, or it would not have been included in this briskly paced, and well-photographed story. It reoccurs at the end of the movie but only as an afterthought. There's a scene with the girlfriend talking, being very cold and cruel, and the main character is a wearing a mask of disgust because he is so emotionally spent. He cannot tell her what has happened to him, and she's an airhead, practically speaking.

The main character is Adam, and a stranger on a cell phone is his Nemesis, his constant antagonist.

Adam is a Muslim man in his mid-30s. The Philippines are overwhelmingly Christian and mostly Roman Catholic, but the substantial Muslim minority there has been raising hell on Mindanao ( and on other islands ), for a century or more. Recently, post-9/11, both domestic anti-terrorist units and U.S. forces have been employed against these Muslim guerrillas and many of them were killed.

So, after flying across the Pacific, stopping over in Taipei and then landing in the Philippines, Adam is perplexed when his mother does not meet him at the airport. He soon learns that she cannot because she has been kidnapped by Muslim fanatics. They are threatening to kill her and Adam's sister if he does not cooperate fully.

At first he thinks that all they really want is money, because they use him to loot a savings account left behind by his father -- one that holds $ 75,000, a most princely sum -- but eventually he figures out that they want him to be a mule for a terrorist bomb attack.

More than half of the film is presented in moving sequences: he's riding in a Jeepney, on a bus, walking, running, taking a tricycle cab and walking some more. The nasty, bitchy fellow on the other end of the cell phone ( that was cleverly inserted into his luggage just before he left the airport on arrival ), alternately harangues him about being a good Muslim and then threatens to murder his mother.

The good Muslim is extorting the slacker Muslim into delivering a bomb ... into a Christian church ... by threatening his family. The poor sap has no choice but to comply.

The film's author and leading man showed great courage in even wanting to tackle this thorny subject. There are some clever moments in "Cavite". It could have been one of the truly great low-budget independents -- think "Mariachi," here -- if the hectic pace of the film had been reduced at certain points, to allow the viewer to see the size of the dilemma and the pain it causes Adam, and to see him feeling strange in the poverty-stricken neighborhoods of Cavite.

Most of the time the cell phone tormentor is speaking Tagalog, or a mixture of Tagalog and English, and the subtitles for that seem to fly by ... meaning, once again, that it is impossible to grasp the size of the problem facing Adam ... because we know after the first four times that the caller says he is going to kill the mother and the sister that this is a bad hombre.

Truly, I hate to discourage a young independent from using his many talents and gifts, and there is evidence of them in "Cavite." But then again, I took the time to screen this film on DVD twice, because I wanted to be sure that it wasn't just the herky-jerky camera work which was upsetting me. "Cavite" invites and involves, but it doesn't deliver 'the goods,' at the end, which is really a false ending and then the viewer is forced to endure a flat-out dead end.

I think it was Chekov who once wrote, "a gun hung on the wall in Act One must be fired by Act Three". This is the advice the makers of "Cavite" should have heard before they labored so lovingly on it.

Great effort and great ideas cannot succeed unless the film has a plot which illustrates the conflict, gives it context, and a resolution. It's only human nature to want an interesting story to have an interesting and meaningful ending. "Cavite" fails in that regard and so all the double-quick camera work and the hectic, panicky pace, goes for naught.

One can only hope the principals of this picture will learn something from this, and do two things with their next film -- slow it down to a brisk walk, so that the plot can develop, and hire an actor who can express nuances, and something emotional, besides disgust.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ultimate Independent Film
mysticwit15 March 2005
CAVITE is an example of ultimate independent film, with a very short budget, a very simple concept, an exotic locale, a minimal cast, and a hand-held camera.

The story is simple: Adam (Ian Gamazon) is called home to the Phillipines because of a family crisis. Instead of his family picking him up, he finds himself forced to follow instructions of a man claiming to have his family. There's no clear reason for the abduction, or what makes Adam a target; all Adam really knows is that his every move is watched, and the kidnappers have no regard for their victims.

As Adam follows the obscure instructions, and the obstacles in his way, the audience can't help but be caught up in his plight. The hand held camera and jumpy editing style enhances the sense of desperation and time. The scenes of urban Phillipines, particular the markets and the squatter holdings are a vivid cacophony.

Co-directors and Co-writers Neill Dela Llana and Ian Gamazon have done an outstanding job of making the most out of limited means. The economy of the film makes it both intimate and discomfiting, as Adam is an everyman who only wants his family safe and instead is completely at the whim of an omniscient tormentor.

CAVITE is an absolute must for anyone who has an interest in film, as storytelling, in it's structure, and as an art form.
29 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well thought out......except for the girlfriend
Pietruck26 March 2007
Gripping movie surrounding a world of religious beliefs, generational betrayals, and blackmail….Throughout, the movie chimes a powerful message as voiced by the main character Adam: "how many people have to die for you to make your point?" Follow Adam as he is guided through the darker sides of human nature while he tries to save his family, his unborn child, and his conviction.

The writers were outstanding in the backdrop motivations for the characters – even down to a little boy thief. They do a good job of helping the viewer wrap realism around the "why". The "voice" on the phone of the terrorist was mesmerizing as he instructed Adam on his journey through the Philippine squatter camps and towns. It was a good choice to not put a face with the voice of Adam's nemesis. The only real problem with the story is the "girlfriend" back story. The conversation between Adam and the girl about her not wanting a "Muslim" baby made no sense and was out of place considering their first conversation on the phone. It should have been left at that.

Over all, it was worth the watch so don't say I didn't tell ya!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Plot combines terrorism and travelogue
tomscratch20045 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Is this the most widely theatrically distributed Filipino film in the history of cinema in the U.S. I believe so.

This film will be an inspiration to independent filmmakers, showing what you can do with a gripping story, great originality, great field locations, a decent digital cam, no special effects, and (almost) no money, and (almost) no crew.

The shaky camera was annoying because it was prominent for the ENTIRE film, except the final scene, where we are back in the States. I was shooting documentary footage for several weeks last October in the Philippines, and this is what your footage looks like when you are shooting from a moving jeepney. I can't stand my footage shot this way and it will end up on the cutting room floor. Here is a whole film shot this way, and it is a bit much. Many independent films have selective scenes shot this way and there is a point to them. I can only figure that they were in too much of a hurry to use a tripod, because the constant blur does't add anything to the dramatic impact of the film after the first few minutes. Too much "AUTHENTICITY" Mahhhhnnnn.

Without the terrorism aspect, this is like a travelogue of the Philippines, unfortunately in the case of the squatter areas. I stayed in a barrio outside of Manila with poor people and it was more like the 'hood back in the States, with water rationing and no hot water, but a pile of garbage was not holding up the walls of the home where I stayed, something I noticed in the squatter areas near the Manila Airport. But EVERYWHERE you go in the Philippines, you will travel by tricycles(motorbikes/motorcycles with side cars), jeepneys, and no air con buses. Everywhere you go, if you are male, you will be invited to cockfights held in arenas the size of huge high school gymnasiums as found Stateside. Everywhere you go, there will be vendors wanting to sell you eggs with warm chickens inside waiting to have their heads bit off.

I traveled extensively several hours to the North of Manila on Luzon Island, in areas of astonishing scenic beauty, not seen in the film. The terrorists/Muslim extremists are holed up in known spots to the South of Manila. Be careful if you go to those areas. In your first day in the Philippines you will effortlessly be able to experience all of the above, except you will not be dealing with kidnappers.

The Philippines is a fantastic place to make a film. I will be back.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hmmm.
Juliette200530 September 2005
While I applaud the film makers for their effort and terrific use of the camera and very little funds, I can't say that I enjoyed this film a great deal. I feel bad saying anything negative about what is clearly such a labor of love, but the story didn't move me or involve me very much. Yes, it's a scrappy tale boldly told, but the tale itself was weak. All the other elements were fine, but if I'm not engaged by the story then I stop caring, and eventually lose interest, which is what happened when I saw this at the festival.

The acting is all fine, particularly the lead man and the voice on the phone (you'll know what I mean when you see it, it really is a lead role even though you never meet him) but there are so many wholes in the story that it never came together for me.

I look forward to these film makers next film, and hope they have a bigger budget, but mostly I urge them to find a better script.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An ordinary guy is trapped in a web of intrigue as he tries to save his mother and sister who have been kidnapped by terrorists.
puedeba20044 June 2006
"Cavite" proves that if the story is good enough, technical excellence is unimportant. Filmed on video with a crew of two, and no budget whatsoever, Cavite is a gripping, roller coaster of a ride. Called to the Philippines, a completely Americanized, young Filipino-American discovers that his mother and sister have been kidnapped. A cellphone planted in his backpack rings and he learns they are held by terrorists and he must follow every direction he is given or they will be killed. Guided by the terrorist's voice on a cellphone, what follows is a tense voyage through the underbelly of Cavite, a city in the Philippines. Although this is at its soul a thriller, by focusing on stark images of third-world poverty, the film cleverly illustrates why terrorist acts have appeal for many. Like all classic thrillers the stakes get higher and higher and the tension grows as the story moves on to its inevitable climax. Although some critics have indicated that they thought the lead actor was lacking in ability I found exactly the opposite -- he is the perfect "everyman," trapped in a situation not of his making. This is great storytelling. I saw this movie twice and recommend it highly.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent thriller. Exhausting, but fun.
Achyut_Prashast_Singh20 December 2020
What compelled me to check out this film was the 2008 Indian film Aamir, which was claimed to be a "remake" of this film even though the director of Aamir denied it. It was really hard to find this film online, but having found and watched it, I can say that Cavite and Aamir are two entirely different movies with only a few similarities. That being said, Aamir is technically and overall a far superior film, but Cavite has merits of its own. It succeeds in immersing the viewer into the lifelike experience that unfolds on the screen.

The depiction of the world around the protagonist is the best thing about Cavite; you get to know a lot about the lives there. The usage of subtitles in one sequence was really artistic and something I haven't seen done before in any film. With only one main character, I was relieved to see filmmakers have actually tried single character stories long before today's times. Performance wise, it's pretty decent as anyone would react the way Adam does, for most of the part. The desperation to save one's family while also not letting go of basic humanity is a challenge depicted realistically in Cavite.

On the downside, the film feels less engaging and "thrilling", until the final act. Although I can readily agree that making a film as "digital" as this on a shoestring budget, that too in times like 2005, is a huge thing, I can't say I was totally into it. For an 80 minute film, it felt too long at times. As a simple story, it could've been even shorter, sadly. It doesn't have anything spectacular on the visual front, but that seems to be the makers' intention to highlight the harsh reality of the real world, and hence not a major issue.

While it might not offer never-ending tension: the one thing that made thrillers like Phone Booth enthrall viewers and further stand the test of time, Cavite is a fairly watchable thriller with a few surprises and lots of realistic moments. The climax surely is something that might stick with me for quite a time. Good luck finding a copy of the film, if you really want to see it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Far-fetched story told with an excessively shaky camera
rasecz28 March 2006
The directors should be commended for doing this film with such scanty resources. A camera, a couple of airline tickets, and one of the directors as actor. Unfortunately, the result shows. The camera is excessively shaky, to the point where a freeze frame is needed so we can read a road sign. The shakiness wore me down. The story is far-fetched. The improbable omnipresent, all-knowing terrorist leader eventually becomes tedious. The sound design used in the middle of the film is obnoxiously loud and abrasive. The only worthy content is the travelogue, an inside view of life in a poor neighborhood in the Philippines.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9 Out Of 10 Muslims Would Agree
randonneur1412 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
It didn't get off to a very good start with the impossible-to-see nearly black and bouncing shot of someone making their way through the dark streets of Manila, onto a Jeepney, followed by something, then cut to San Diego and our main character. We'll only find out later that it was our hero's father on a forced suicide bombing mission to save his family.

Back in San Diego Adam gets two calls, one from his mother telling him to fly back to the Philippines, though again the reason isn't given that he is called back to attend his father's funeral, so we have no way of connecting the previous scene with these new characters? The second is from his presumedly white American girlfriend telling him she is going to get an abortion because he's such a loser with his crummy night security job, that she can't have a baby with him.

Then he's off to Manila, via Taipei, just like my first visit to the Philippines, though luckily I didn't have the additional addiction to cigarettes to deal with on my 24 hours of flying, waiting, and changing planes, just SARS and a sore ass. He seems to have mastered the telephone system around the world though, while I was never able to use any phone in the Philippines, my calling card from AT&T completely useless.

While he's sitting around the airport and calling his mom over and over we're left to guess that's he's never actually been to the Philippines before and doesn't even have enough sense to get a taxi and go to where they live or are staying. So we never know why he was raised in the US, while his mom, sister and previously his dad are all in the PH.

From there we begin the "story" when he hears a ringing and à la The Matrix he finds a mysterious cell phone in a "Manila" envelope in his carry on bag, and on the other end, instead of "Morpheus," though suspiciously with the same ability to see everything Adam is doing, everywhere, and directs him similarly to the office scene in The Matrix, is a horrible Muslim extremist kidnapper from Mindanao, who's holding his mom and sister at rape and knife point if Adam doesn't do exactly as he's told. Which includes leaving his larger suitcase behind.

Out on the streets Adam is introduced to the horrors of Manila, from children with no pants, to shanty towns, to burning fields of garbage, to people wading through polluted water. All of these scenes are obviously the actor and a cameraman walking around Manila while everyone is looking simply because they have a camera. But they make it seem as if they're all looking at Adam suspiciously, giving him the stink eye maybe, which isn't how the PH is at all, even for a tall white guy.

After the wandering Adam gets into the action when he witnesses the murder of a "faggot" by a couple of thugs hired by the kidnapper, being forced to eat balut to distract him while his carry-on bag is stolen by a little kid, and finally he is told what exactly he has to do to get his family back: go to the bank and take out his Dad's $75K in reward money for ratting out the terrorists to the Army. He does this easily and at the cock fighting arena exchanges the money for his carry-on bag, which is now considerably heavier.

The second part of his mission now becomes clear: he has to bomb a church full of people, but not suicide, he gets to walk away. Still he ponders the decision for a minute. Here's where most people will get confused by this movie but not I, and I will tell you: Adam doesn't go through with it out of selfishness. He doesn't chose the lives of the few he knows over the lives of many strangers, he decides to bomb those people because, as a Muslim himself he has been conditioned by his religious upbringing and egged on by the reminders from the kidnapper of the violence done to Muslims in the Philippines, he is easily convinced that it is the right thing to do! His conception of "jihad" is too slow and too hard, and he's already shown he's a loser with a crappy job.

We never hear the bomb go off, never see him reunite with his family, and end with his ex-girlfriend telling him how she could never raise a kid to be a Muslim, further justification for everything he did. If the whole world's against you, why not bomb some kids? Many people are unsure if this message is eye-opening or we just watched an Islamic propaganda film? I'll assume the former until assured of the later.

The major problem with this movie is any ignorant people watching this will assume that all these people in Manila are Muslims, when they're most certainly not, but instead are all Catholics, the effective state religion. The kidnapper's a Muslim, the main character is a Muslim, his thugs must be Muslim, the kid he hired to steal the guy's bag must be Muslim. No and no to the last two.

Finally, the point of the story showing how poor the Filipinos are is lost in the confusion. They're not saying there are Muslim extremists because the people are poor, they're trying to say, "Look how poor the Filipinos are!" And in addition, "Hello, there are a few cells of Muslim terrorists from Mindanao plotting in Manila." The scene with the kid sharing his McDonald's with his grandma is the former point.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Making a hard choice.
lastliberal27 November 2009
Writing, directing, and starring in this independent film, Neill Dela Llana and Ian Gamazon are definitely two people to watch.

This is an exciting movie about an American who is brought back to the Philippines to do something for terrorist in order that he might save his mother and sister. The pace is face as we wait to see what he will be required to do.

The film is not just about terrorism, but also blends in the grinding poverty in the Phillipines, where Adam (Gamazon) is introduced to the underside of this society children sell their bodies for prostitution, and the odor of a polluted swamp forces him to cover his nose; and the government's campaign against Muslims. It is more than a thriller. It is also an education to those who don't often focus on the plight of others in the world.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cavite..a wasted opportunity
Aditya_Gokhale24 April 2012
A couple of Filipino guys put together a brilliant idea and decided to make a film on it. Neill Dela Llana and Ian Gamazon, two ambitious young men had the concept very much in place.

The idea revolves around an American Filipino named Adam, returning to his homeland in the Philippines only to become the target of a mysterious caller on a cell phone who has kidnapped his sister and mother and threatens to kill them if Adam doesn't comply with certain demands of his. He is not allowed to hang up either. The caller has a task for Adam and Adam is supposed to see it through to its conclusion, failing which the consequences would be dire! Adam finds himself constantly stalked as he is made to travel all around Cavite city and explore its dark underbelly, in order to run the caller's "errand". Everywhere he goes he feels he is being watched and a lot of people seem to be "in on it", as at every step, Adam finds something which enables him to move forward in his task. What's more…the caller seems to know his every move! The plot thickens as Adam finds there is more to it than meets the eye. Why has he been chosen by the caller? Could it be some extremists who have involved him in something much more dangerous than he can handle? So there you have it. Sounds great on paper, right? But does every great idea transform into a well-executed motion picture? Sadly not, and "Cavite" is testimony to this fact.

"Cavite" partially works solely due to its interesting premise. It is this premise that somewhat manages to engage the viewer, not the execution; because the execution simply doesn't have much to talk about. Shot entirely on hand-held camera that gets irritating after a while with its constantly wobbly and brownish yellow cinematography, the film captures mostly the squalid parts of the city where there are squatter camps and garbage dumps and hungry, naked children! Now such visuals should normally move the viewer but blame it on the handling, it fails to resonate with the viewer or evoke any kind of emotion, barring a few scenes which speak volumes of the inherent hypocrisy of terrorists who scream "Jihad" at the drop of a hat! Certain props used to scare or disturb us clearly appear fake and that is another big failure on the filmmakers' part. The film feels slightly long even for its considerably short 80 minutes length, thanks to a lazy screenplay which just doesn't reflect the sense of urgency or anxiety that is very much essential for the subject at hand. There are hardly any tense moments and the apart from the filmmaker, the person largely to be blamed for this is the lead actor, Ian Gamazon! This is the kind of story that has to depend on the protagonist's able shoulders, because ultimately, it is his predicament that is supposed to evoke sympathy in his favour and thus engage the viewer. Sadly our hero proves to be the weakest link as he fails to bring out the helplessness or the vexation that any guy in his shoes would feel. If someone is holding your mother and sister hostage and wants you to carry out a task that could get you in trouble, you should be one big bundle of nerves! But Gamazon almost casually goes through everything, trying to force some emotions on his face once a while and swearing out loud when he is unable to. Alas, it amounts to hardly anything and this is the film's biggest failure. The actor just fails to connect with the audiences! Then how are we supposed to care about his outcome anyway. The background score is also very uninspired and incomplete; perhaps some attention to a good score could've provided some leverage to the film.

Some suspense built in the final half hour of the film raises our expectations and one wishes the makers hadn't been slothful with the conclusion at least, but the film pretty much ends with a whimper. Add to that some done to death clichéd ramblings about how Muslims are targeted everywhere, thus forcing them to build terrorist outfits for "Jihad" all around the world and one particularly cringe-worthy scene about Adam's American girlfriend "not wanting to have a Muslim baby" further mar any bright prospects for the film in the audiences' favour.

"Cavite" is a solid idea that just barely makes it in getting successfully transferred to a gripping motion picture. It has its moments but as an overall product, it just about manages to stay afloat. Watch only if you must….

(Trivia :-)…But here's an interesting fact. In 2008, Indian director Raj Kumar Gupta made "Aamir", a Bollywood film which rips off the premise and most of the screenplay of "Cavite". Only the action is shifted to streets of Mumbai city instead of Cavite! "Aamir" is a better made film, is considerably gripping and has a much better actor (Rajeev Khandelwal) playing the central actor. However, nothing can change the fact that it is shameless and unethical rip-off of "Cavite". One only wishes Gupta had officially purchased the rights instead of blatantly copying, thinking that no one would notice. Sad..

Score: 6/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A video tour guide on the Slum Areas, a lesson in Philippine culture
AuntyG12 September 2006
Here's my mini review.

  • the film's not bad. it's well edited and shot. But I feel the movie's trying a little to hard to be a video tour guide on the Philippines' slum areas and show non-Filipinos up close what poverty is like there. I'm not impressed with the story either. I've never felt Adam's life was in danger, and the voice on the phone was a joke (he sounds a little gay, IMO).


  • I don't think "Cavite" is a hotbed for Abu Sayyaf terrorist activity. and most of the kidnappings in Luzon are done by corrupt military and police officers, not Muslim Fanatics. The Philippines is 90% Catholic IIRC. But I guess it would be much more dangerous for Gamazon to film it in Basilan, therefore Cavite, since most foreigners can't tell the difference anyways.


  • How was it possible for Tariq (the phone caller), to follow Adam wherever he goes (from squatter areas to open fields to little alleys) without being seen? Is he god or something? - The unseen caller is always lecturing and preaching. The caller ordered Adam to eat a "balut", drink soda from a plastic bag, and go to a cockfighting event so that Adam can "experience" the Filipino culture and reality... Blah blah blah...


  • somebody said the movie's about how poverty will make Filipinos become suicide bombers or terrorists. But I think that's wrong. The Philippines is a predominantly Catholic country with only a 5% Muslim population. Most Filipinos are poor Catholics, but you don't see them becoming suicide bombers, no? And Osama bin laden and the 19 9/11 hijackers are not exactly poor people.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Commendable effort but short on film-making logic
saintelmosfire711 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I saw Cavite recently here in L.A., in the only theater it is being released, the Nuart at West LA. I've been hearing the buzz on this film so it was curiosity that drove me from Long Beach to L.A to watch it. OK, as a prospective filmmaker, I laud and commend the efforts of the filmmaker for just doing the film. With very limited budget, equipment and actors, they were able to pull it through despite the meager means they have. I can understand the sloppy camera work and even the not-so-great acting of the actor/director, but it makes me uncomfortable not to mention that the filmmakers left some important detail in the movie - logic. First, Cavite is, a conservative estimate, 40 miles from Quiapo church in Manila. In the Philippines, were traffic is part of the daily commute, we measure the distance between two locations not by miles but by travel time. And Cavite is more or less a 2 hr drive from Manila. How the hell did Adam get back in forth from Cavite to Quiapo and vice versa in such quick time? And using public transport no less? And how did his cellphone battery last that long? I mean, they should've considered people who are familiar with the location that are going to see this movie. Its like insulting them, I should know, I grew up in Quiapo. Anyways, like I said, I still admire them for their mere guts in doing this film. And please stop using scenes of poverty as a depiction of the Philippines! Scenes like these get manipulated so much in movies like these.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Provocative and insightful gem
for-vicky6 January 2007
Cavite, in its simplicity, is a provocative and insightful gem. This movie adeptly presents the complexities of culture and nationalism using parallels and metaphors interwoven in a culture few will encounter. The story's plot is simple enough- an Americanized Filipino American (Adam) whose life is in chaos returns to the Philippines to attend his fathers funeral, but instead, embarks on a horrific rescue mission to get his ransomed mother and sister back from the Abu Sayyaf, an extremist Muslim group. The violent tension in this movie is subtle and below the radar, but keeps the viewer watching. But it is the emotional tension- the play with expectations that breaks from being predictable; the killer who loves love songs, has a reassuring voice; Adam, the victim, is a non-violent Muslim; the grinding poverty and Adam's naivete; the kid who steals for the Abu Sayyaf steals to eat McDonalds. The backdrop of the plot is the forced education of Adam to a culture he has had no connections to. While for many Filipinos, this can be tedious, the depth of the movie begins to beg the question- who are the real hostages, and what will we do to save them.

That the movie has a circular plot- it ends where it begins but with a twist- leaves the viewer forced to contemplate the significance, which can be profound, "dangerous" as some have described, but open to interpretation. This can be troubling to some who want to see movies that require no thought.

Cinematically, the movie is remarkable, low budget or not. The shots are insightful and capture the reality of everyday life in a town greatly affected by poverty. One can almost smell the diesel fumes, the odors in the market and feel the tension of desperation. Because this is the personal story of Adam, a home-video feel to the footage adds to the credibility that this is his story.

Most mainstream thrillers have something in their plot that is implausible, and this one is no exception- the everpresent killer, and that there is a Filipino who doesn't know what balut is.

It is unfortunate the cover and sub-title imply Cavite is a Sylvester Stallone no-brainer which makes me wonder whether the brilliance of this movie was a result of the directors' intention. In any case, this movie is worth viewing for its creative display of a complex subject- but with a caveat- this movie presents a picture that is not characteristic of all life in the Philippines- something few viewers will take into account. This isn't the responsibility of the directors, however. It speaks to the fact that there are too few Filipino filmmakers.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Story not very plausible, hand held camera work sloppy
hometax4 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This could have been a very good film, but it wasn't. Although the plot wasn't very plausible, it was complex, fairly original, and provided suspense. The scenes of urban Manila/Cavite, the abject poverty, the sense of seeing life as it really is for the masses in the urban Philippines, made the film a proponent of sorts for the poor and unprivileged, this was powerful. However, virtually everything of value in this film was obviated by very, very sloppy hand-held camera work. The hand held cameras, while ostensibly adding to the authenticity of the film, were operated so sloppily that viewers experienced discomfort or outright nausea. This was absolutely unnecessary and significantly detracted from both the plot and the quality of the film. Many viewers exited the theater in the early minutes of the film.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An indie very low budget tour de force
Dj_Cthulhu12 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I just return from watching this movie at SXSW Festival here in Austin and I just gotta say that this is a perfect example of what you can accomplish just by having a good idea and lots of creativity to take it to the next level.

Besides from being filmed entirely in digital video, the camera work (no steady-cam, just primitive hand-held) allows you to experience the whole movie in a way that you almost feel part of it. It's like you're the one controlling the main character.

To summarize the story, I can tell you that Adam (who lives in San Diego) is not having the best time of his life. His girlfriend is breaking up with him while his father dies back home in Philippines. So he go back there but realizes that the situation has been terribly complicated. His mother and sister has been kidnapped so now, Adam is forced to face the reality that he choose to forget: the hard reality of his poverty stricken nation.

Will he risk everything to save the lives of his remaining family? For every fellow aspiring filmmaker, this is the kind of movie that should inspire you to pursue your dream. If you don't find it that great at all, at least you'll feel inspire to go out and start shooting.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wonderfully shot, but ideologically terrible
elrodax3 June 2006
This movie really is, as some of the commentators have said, a tour de force of mise en scene - it is shot with a distinctive hand-held camera style, features some powerful performances (most notably by Ian Gamazon as Adam, a secular Muslim American born in the Phillipines), and makes exceptional use of its gritty noir setting of Philippino urban slums.

Yet, the movie is ultimately extremely disappointing. Cavite ultimately fails in two interconnected ways. First, as a dramatic story, chiefly because its main character is irredeemably weak (and the vicious, stereotyped anti-gay viewpoint portrayed tacitly builds strength on this weakness). Adam not only fails as a protagonist - he is unable to affect the action in any way throughout the entire film - but as a moral being. He shirks responsibility for his stark moral choices: Ultimately, he is willing to take decisive action to murder a large crowd of innocent people to save his own loved ones - and this miserable character is the only potentially oppositional voice that might at least rhetorically counter the unseen but omniscient and omnipotent "Abu Sayaf" spokesman. As a result, that terrorist mastermind directs every aspect of the film, and the erstwhile protagonist is utterly impotent and, indeed, evil.

If Adam fails completely to present an alternative or corrective to the (alleged) Abu Sayaf propaganda, the cinematography seems equally complicit in its support for the terrorist's vague and self-satisfied critique of western society (with its documentary footage of privation and social exclusion). So, the deck is stacked from deuce to ace, and that is why the film so completely fails as a work of drama.

But, secondly, this is also why the film fails morally as well. Cavite goes beyond consciousness raising in its vivid presentation of poverty and moves toward a subtle, but deeply corrupt sympathy for "revolutionary" terrorism in the name of "the people". The kindest reading is that, with no effective counterweight to the faceless voice of the Abu Sayaf terrorist, the film falls victim to a sort of Stockholm Syndrome, crossing over completely into the terrorist's view of the world. In fact, at the end, the film really lays its cards on the table in a terrible, facile scene back in the USA, where Adam is shown to be victim of blatant American prejudice because of his religion.

Despite its technical achievements, this is an evil movie. It is wrong and it is destructive. By failing to offer an effective alternative to mass murder in the name of social revolution, this movie leaves us with nothing beyond the vague but malicious terrorist viewpoint, without any dramatic or rhetorical attempt at rebuttal. The result is not only bad storytelling, but the nasty suspicion that one has watched an extremely well-shot propaganda video for an hour and twenty minutes.

Jeremiah B.C. Axelrod
4 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of time
jdccna20 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The DVD box made it look like a watchable flick, but it was terribly misleading. It was a piece of crap. We get to watch some dope get led around by the nose for an hour or so by some terrorist wannabe on a cellphone. They want his money, they want him to blow up a building, and they will cut off pieces of his mother and sister to make it happen. The guy is told to close his bank account and give the bad guys the money. They couldn't get into the bank to film, so we get to watch a little kid eating a happy meal. How creative. The explosion at the church/mosque/whatever was equally impressive. Fast forward though a few phone calls and long walks and we get to the end. Same kid, same happy meal, sharing with grandma. How sweet. They couldn't bother to have an explosion sound effect and shake the camera a little? Then he goes home, talks to his cheating girlfriend, and curls up in bed crying....the end. What a waste of time. I got it as a freebie from Blockbuster, and I still feel cheated.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pleasantly impressed with the film
kcabad-122 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This film, with a shoestring budget and a few cast members, unexpectedly satisfied my longing for brilliant Filipino film-making. Although, at times the movie was annoying, all the minor slights were forgiven in the end. I can't help but cringe on the voice over that they used for the terrorist and the shaky camera handling which almost induced vertigo among the viewers. Certain parts of the dialogue were unnecessary and were probably added to the film just to trigger shock from the audience. Nevertheless, the movie's sum is definitely greater than its parts. The depiction of the slums, streets and people of the Philippines was very realistic. The scenes were so vivid that the audience would actually feel like being transported to where the shots were taken. Cinematography and editing were fantastic - I like how the same frames, i.e. face of the lead actor, were illustrated from various angles. Very cutting-edge for novice film makers! The plot they tried to tackle was very touchy, but they delivered it in a straight-forward, in your face manner. Overall, this is a film that I would recommend for anyone who enjoys watching Filipino films! Good Job on this one!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed