Jimmy and Judy (2006) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
What An Experience
jzappa17 September 2006
This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where I'd only first heard of it the very day I saw it. Seeing this dark, grungy low-budget independent movie late at night at a large-scale mainstream theater just seemed to drop in my lap. It was quite an experience. Only halfway through the film did I realize that this shot in my town. There's a scene where we see the profile of Rachael Bella in medium closeup as she drives. In the background, I saw what I had a strange feeling was familiar. Then, after she passes a few dead giveaways, I'm taken by surprise in finding that this film was shot in my city. Well, it was shot in the grimiest and seediest parts of my city, but it's my city. I then realized that that must be the reason why it's being shown at this mainstream theater rather than being confined to the Esquire or the Mariemont theaters.

Jimmy and Judy is one of those relentless gritty and voyeuristic couple-on-the-run movies. It's reminiscent of Francois Ozón's Criminal Lovers, and even Baise Moi, which was scuzzy to the point of being pornographic. Jimmy and Judy is one of those movies that, in the end, is almost completely desensitizing and fixates your mind on a disturbing and morbid atmosphere that you'd rather it not be fixated on, and you end up being under its spell for the next day or two.

That is not to say that Jimmy and Judy is not a well-made movie. It is. Otherwise, how could it put you under such a spell? Its effect is the surefire sign that it's done its job. It's about everything intriguing to that is to most people the underside of your mind. It's all about the effect of alienation, vindication most people only think of under the influence of serious bouts of anger, and other things that, in a movie, are not for everyone. Yes, there are many movies that tackle subject matter like this, but not to such a raw and overwhelming extent. William Sadler's character alone is one of the scariest and most realistic people I think I've ever seen in a movie.

Jimmy and Judy is not quite at the status where it can be called a great movie, but it has a very clear message and a very precise and innovative way of conveying it. It-does-not-pull- any-punches.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
engrossing
antoniotierno26 June 2007
This movie was a pleasant surprise and though reminding a lot "Natural Born Killers", from which borrowed many things, has a particular appeal of its own. Both kids are mentally disturbed and the whole story focuses on this disturbance and on the experiment of videotaping everything - by the way the manner sequences are shot is similar to "The Blair Witch Project". Edward Furlong's rage and Rachael Bella's sexual drive are visible and their outrageous behavior is believable, their chemistry is quite impressive (on the other hand they're husband and wife in the real life). I'd recommend the movie for their performances and for the street theater like atmosphere.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Outcast teen lovers run into big trouble
roland-1049 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
It's the old formula of star crossed young lovers, misfits in their families and at school, who flee on a road trip resulting in murder and culminating in self destruction. Think equal parts of "Bonnie & Clyde," "Wild at Heart," "Natural Born Killers," and any number of others. Compared to those films, however, this one suffers from lengthy unexciting intervals.

Jimmy's (Edward Furlong) constant video documentation of his life is a throw-in gimmick, though it is well accomplished. A far more charming aspect that elevates this film from mediocrity is the authentic aura of infatuation between Jimmy and his girlfriend Judy (Rachael Bella). These two people are obviously captivated by one another. Reason? It was the real thing: the two actors did fall in love while making this film and married; their first child, a son, was just born (on September 21, 2006).

With splendid cameos by Chaney Kley as an intoxicated meth-head and William Sadler as Uncle Rodney, the predatory leader of a drug besotted commune. Sadler's fierce soliloquy about providing a haven for society's castoffs - the "garbage culture" he calls his supplicants - may make this film worth seeing. My grades: 7/10 (B) (Seen at the Idaho International Film Festival, 09/29/06)
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent for a first film - definitely worth watching
BenjAii3 September 2007
Jimmy & Judy overcomes it's limitations to be a film I'd definitely recommend even if intriguingly it points to greater things that it never achieves.

It's the first time I've seen a film filmed entirely from a first person point of view and I found this very striking. In many ways approaching film narrative through this device is very fitting for our age. We are surrounded as never before by video cameras, on phones, on CCTV etc and we spend more and more of our time viewing the end products of all of this on the internet. It stuck me watching me Jimmy & Judy just how rich the possibilities are here, developed further it could become a new genre of film. These possibilities aren't deeply explored here, but none the less where they are, it's surprising who naturally they seem to fit into the narrative. We see this as a story told about Jimmy, yet he's it's creator. People are frequently aware that they are speaking to camera, yet somehow we feel they are being filmed speaking to camera, as if there was another camera there filming this. It's a tribute to the skill of the directors that all of this works as smoothly as it does.

As other reviewers have pointed out another arresting feature of this film is the chemistry between to the two characters, fortuitously helped by the fact there was real off screen chemistry there as they actually ended up getting married in real life. Although I'd no idea watching at the time, this helps to keep their journey intriguing and watchable. Edward Furlong in particular gives it all with this character and as OTT as it can be it's all very watchable. I'd have to point out some great dark humor at the beginning to where Furlong's character films some scenes between Mommy & Daddy that really should have stayed secret – very funny.

This is a great film and all the more impressive for being made on a budget of close to nothing in 15 days. However it's not without it's flaws. All things considered it would be nitpicking to go after anything small, but there are two things that stop it being in the ranks of real great film making for me.

The first is that cliché of clichés in American cinema, guns. I know Raymond Chandler said whenever he ran out of ideas when writing he always fell back on having a man walk into a room with a gun. Perhaps it takes a non-American from the outside looking in (I'm Irish) to see it but characters with guns has become utterly tedious in American cinema. It's been cinematic shorthand for drama and angst since the days of film noir and while it's been reinvented successfully over the decades, it's formulaic in the extreme. So hence Jimmy & Judy's Bonnie & Clyde style crime spree becomes a little, how can I say this, done so many times before. People using guns, dealing with guns, or having guns seem to be in about three quarters of American films. Boring, boring, boring – can't you find some other way to talk about the human condition.

The second problem is their characters motivation for this angst driven spree. The film has a brilliant monologue near the end from William Sadler, a sort of white trash Declaration of Rights that speaks rivetingly of alienation, anger and despair. It seems to form a sort of denouement, the trouble is it's nothing to do with Jimmy or Judy who seem to have grown up in nice, well off, middle class homes. It's a shame having established this brilliant level of passion in Sadler's character, something similar couldn't be found for the leads, but apart from their love for each other it never is. By way of explanation we're offered their characters social ostracism in school but given their reaction to it, it doesn't come across as convincing. So as watchable as their journey, given its level of alienation and anger, it's never truly credible or believable.

Still that's not to gripe too much, as a debut this is excellent and well worth watching.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad, but should be better...
picklefuzzy9 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Jimmy and Judy,a well-made semi-remake of "Badlands" with some "Natural Born Killers" thrown in for good measure, isn't a bad time at the movies, to be sure, but also isn't near as good as it should be.

I caught the world premiere of this movie at SF Indie, and I can certainly see why they picked it - edgy, counterculture, chock full of sex and violence. It's also very well acted, particularly by Furlong, and has terrific sound design. But ultimately, the film goes nowhere, with characters that neither illicit compassion nor interest, and a story which seems to meander, predictability, to a place that has nothing really to do with either Jimmy or Judy. We never really understand their "angst" the way we should. Apparently, just because they're young, sweaty, unkempt, swear and screw a lot, they get to be angry and rebellious.

The one moderately original thing about the film is that Jimmy videotapes everything (this is not a spoiler - it's evident in the trailer and from frame 1 of the movie), and this is used as a narrative device ala "Blair Witch". Kinda nifty, but still, nothing else in the movie - either Furlong's character nor the story, pay this off in any way, and ultimately, it doesn't make sense.

If you like angst for angst's sake, this is for you. But if you want to be engaged by story or character, you may do best to look elsewhere.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Lost in the whirlwind
Anonymous_Maxine1 June 2008
There is a very brief period of many peoples' young lives, usually sometime in junior high school or high school, when it is cool to be a loser, an outcast. The girls like the guys that ditch school and get in trouble with the police and have disastrous relationships with their parents. That period of life does not, however, extend beyond high school, which might be why 21-year-old Jimmy (played by a plump, 30-year-old Eddie Furlong) manages to get a high school girl to fall in love with him.

I love the irony here, by the way. Judy is clearly a smart and successful student who one day is attacked by a group of girls, the bad kids (by the way, do high school girls really do this? Definitely not when I was in school…), which Jimmy catches on tape because he films everything. Later he exacts vicious revenge on two of the people involved in the attack and shows it to Judy, who is horrified but ultimately touched that he would look out for her in such a way. Soon afterwards she falls intensely in love with Jimmy, who is not a far cry removed from the same kinds of jerks that attacked her in the first place.

This is going to be a film that most people will either love or hate, although I happen to have strongly disliked it, but I didn't hate it. It's an extremely simply made film, shot almost entirely from the perspective of a home video camera and cut for the most part to run like an unedited MiniDV tape. There won't be any concern about motion sickness, but it's an intensely realistic portrayal of the lives of a couple of genuinely screwed up kids. In short, for a good majority of the movie it is genuinely unpleasant to watch, as it is meant to be.

Personally, I knew a lot of people like Jimmy (minus the killing) in high school because I hung out with the wrong people for a couple years. These are the guys that never go home because they hate their parents and are always drunk or on drugs. I don't know why people hang out with people like that, they are highly unpleasant to be around, particularly the nutty ones like the crackhead that Jimmy and Judy shack up with for a couple hours midway through the movie. I like movies that bring back fun memories from high school. Jimmy and Judy brings back memories, but all the wrong ones.

I bought the movie, by the way, because I was curious to see what Eddie Furlong was up to these days. He was phenomenal in Terminator 2 but his career never really seemed to go very far after that, except for his outstanding role in the spectacular American History X. I don't know much about his personal life, but he is a little TOO good at playing a dirtbag. It's also interesting that he looks so handsome on the cover box, because little Eddie has become quite the meatball.

Anyway, his Jimmy in this movie is an unhinged lunatic with absolutely no redeeming values whatsoever, while Judy is pretty and smart. Whether you like the movie or not, believing her interest in him is no small feat. They are polar opposites and it's nearly impossible to understand what she sees in him, but their chemistry works well enough so I guess it doesn't matter. We do, however, see in great detail why Jimmy is so twisted (we are, after all, products of our environment, and his parents' relationship is one of the sickest marriages I've ever seen, in a movie or otherwise), but we learn nothing about Judy's past, including why she was being bullied at school.

But the worst part of all, by far, is this ridiculous commune at the end of the film. It is a mixture of a twisted cult group and what I imagine Woodstock must have looked like. You see, there is some insane fanatic known as Uncle Rodney who has started this as a place for trashy people to go live. I think his exact words were "garbage people," meaning they are the garbage of society. Nice. I can see the appeal already.

This Rodney is played by William Sadler, who must never have had a more pointless role. The only purpose he serves here is to make this already trashy movie look like preachy crap. You can feel yourself being punched in the face with the transparent "social commentary" when he gives his goofy, fiery speech near the end of the movie. You see, apparently he believes that by providing this retreat for the trash of society, they'll become stronger with each new addition, while the "outside world" gets weaker with every one, until they become so strong that they can rain garbage on the world that threw them away and then "fornicate in their ashes." Are you hearing this? WOW.

I would hate to be the one to burst his balloon, but I have a feeling that the subtraction of a lot of criminals and junkies and drunks is not exactly going to make society weaker…

Ultimately, the movie starts off as a serious downer and goes downhill from there. I was thoroughly depressed by the time it was over and couldn't even take my afternoon nap. I hate that.

Note: Another IMDb user called this the best film at the San Fran Indie Fest. Boy am I glad I missed that one. And by the way, some lunatic from the San Francisco Chronicle has claimed that this is the movie that Natural Born Killers wanted to be, and at 1/20th of the cost.

Yeah, right. They spent $500,000 on this? Scary. I would say that not more than about $1,200 made it onto the screen….
19 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Thoroughly disappointing, frustratingly graphic.
stumbeline3328 January 2008
As a very open-minded and avid fan of film, I must say that this movie was distasteful and over the top for a variety of reasons. Basically, sociopathic teens turn to murder in the most predictable of steps while subjecting the viewer to grotesquely graphic images that only serve to disturb. It's a concept that has been done before, and done in a far more provocative way. The film has some different elements (i.e. the concept of the video diary and the extremely long, single-take scenes) and there are a few occasions where something genuinely interesting and unique is produced. But these moments are few and don't in the slightest make up for the one-dimensional, tired formula of "youth spinning out of control".

Edward Furlong is inarguably flawless in his delivery of the role, but that's really the only slightly positive statement that can be said for the acting. The directing grows sloppy in the second half and loses all the intimacy and realism that made the film mildly interesting at first. The sound editing is irritatingly unrealistic and sometimes takes the movie to a place dangerously close to kitsch. And the writing is dull at best; every scene is PAINFULLY transparent in its intended character or plot development and basic, simple points in the setup of the story (why is Judy so horribly harassed at school?) go entirely ignored.

Lacking any real style or purpose and with an irritating, smug arrogance, "Jimmy and Judy" is a self-indulgent parade of predictability and shocking images with no real counter-point. Frankly, not worth the time.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Best Film in San Fran IndieFest
kyliehouston7516 February 2006
Hands down this was the best film at the festival. Realistic, haunting, and down right disturbing, I couldn't stop thinking about this film for days - in a good way.

The chemistry between the two leads, (Edward Furlong and Rachael Bella) is amazing. I hear they are now a real life couple.

My friend and I saw it Sunday night at the Women's building and we were nothing short of amazed. Got to meet the directors and they were very open to questions and explained some of the challenges they faced while making the film.

This film will be known for quite some time. It really will make you think.
22 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Jimmy & Judy & Bonnie & Clyde & the Blair Witch
thesar-231 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
There are times that Furlong's (as Jimmy) acting goes on and off like a light switch – probably equally as good as it was bad. Then there's Bella (as Judy) whose acting more resembles a strobe light, again with both good and bad performances, only in her case it's within seconds. 'Jimmy & Judy' really isn't an original idea, aside from, of course, updating 'The Doom Generation,' 'National Born Killers' and of course, 'Bonnie & Clyde,' to the U-tube generation – i.e. the entire movie was shot via hand-held cameras. And even that concept really isn't new – think way back to 'The Blair Witch Project.' So, basically nothing is new to the youth gone wild genre. We have troubled young Jimmy with an equally portrayed dysfunctional family. He's infatuated with Judy who doesn't like Jimmy, then does. Who doesn't like the camera in her face, then she does. Who doesn't like nudity, then she does. Who doesn't like the crimes broken by Jimmy, and then does. And on and on. We all know where this is going, as we've been here before. Though, as previously stated, Furlong's acting, at times, when he is at calm, that is, isn't too shabby and I yearn for more of that. I've been a fan of his from his Pasadena discovery for 'T2' through his typical young-Hollywood downfall. (SEE: LaBeouf, Spears and the late Renfro.) He still has potential, but chooses to throw it away. Hence, this character of Jimmy, probably hit a little too close to home. The movie does have some shocks – not to spoil, as it was foretold to audience, it was still a surprise scene when Judy's life of crime really begins.

The #1 thing that did freak me out, as this mirrors the myspace/utube generation, is that I actually saw a true life story like this unfold on Myspace in 2006 in the case of Jacob D. Robida and his girlfriend on the run. It was actually a sobering experience reading the events as they progressed, reading the responses from the other troubled kids rooting him on, kill cops, etc. So, this movie may be fiction, but is, unfortunately, ever so real. (Google his story to see that truly disturbing and hate-filled minors really do exist.)
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Review
daledecker20006 February 2006
Jimmy and Judy This clever, heartfelt piece of gonzo indie film-making is the movie Natural Born Killers should have been. It commences with a clever premise: everything we see is captured through the lens of Jimmy's videocamera. In the first reel, this conceit works a tad like Bogart's character just out of prison in Elmer Daves' Dark Passage, with the subjective camera point-of-view employed until after plastic surgery.

Jimmy (a great turn by former child star Edward Furlong, whose career seems to be headed in the right direction again) reveals himself only in the presence of Judy (Rachael Bella). Jimmy has poor impulse control. He woos Judy by exacting revenge on the kids who have bullied her at school, films his parents' gender-switching sex, and, in a very funny piece of Americana, freaks out in a fast-food car lane after pickles are improperly included with his double cheeseburger.

They hit the road for their obligatory crime spree. A bout of in-car flirting leads to a very twisted hit-and-run accident. J & J wind up in a rural commune where young folks of both genders become the playthings of a speed freak Hitler (prompting a scary monologue by William Sadler).

J & J would be truly sublime if the plot gave more attention to Bella's Judy. Furlong and Bella have that rare sexual/emotional chemistry that allows one to suspend judgment and enjoy the ride. Furlong is a smart, intuitive actor who seems willing to do almost anything to satisfy a role. The fast-food diet gives him a slightly bloated look, which is good for the character, bad for Eddie. Superbly helmed by writer/directors Jon Schroder and Randall K. Rubin, this one would make a deliciously twisted teen triple-feature with Larry Clark's Another Day in Paradise and Francois Ozon's Criminal Lovers. (Roxie, 2/4; Women's Bldg., 2/12)
15 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What the hell were the film makers thinking?
xtremekornfreak15 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I've seen a lot of bad movies lately, but HOLY HELL!!! When I first heard about Jimmy and Judy, I was mildly interested. Two young (rolls eyes) lover go on a violence and destruction rampage. Kinda a new NBK or Bonnie and Clide. Well it was far from any of those classics. J & J is just persistent boredom. Long shots of NOTHING!! Annoying ?acting? by furlong, random nudity, horrible tattoos. OH GOD!! the TATTOOS!!! Okay, heres a game you can play while watching this movie. Each time you see a fake tattoo (looks like they went to staples, bought a 12 pack of sharpies and colored in some tribal crap. Awful.) take a drink. Aside from the tattoos and the acting, the entire thing being done in a hand cam by the characters gets old FAST. It felt constantly forced and not natural at all. SPOILER: One shot in particular that I laughed at was towards the end after Jimmy gets the crap kicked out of him by the commune people. Let me set the stage: the guy just had a beating to within an inch of his life; he comes to at night and grabs his CAMERA turns it on and carries it with him as he stumble around to get to his van and back to the house to kill people. Now, maybe I'm crazy, BUT... If I was just stomped by about a half dozen large hillbillies, when I came too I really don't think my first act would be to reach over and turn on my flippin handy-cam. Spoilers over.

Final thoughts: Skip Jimmy and Judy unless you want to laugh at a horrible story, boring and pointless directing, and Ed Furlong looking like a fool.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Horrendously second-rate derivative junk...
MrGKB21 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
...that has likely departed the memories of the handful of people who actually burned the useless hour-twenty or so it took to watch it; I know I'll be looking forward to forgetting it as soon as possible, except as yet another example of Sturgeon's Revelation (check yer Wikipedia, kiddies). It will remain notable for only one thing: the introduction of Edward "Pecker" Furlong (looking almost as bad as he did in the execrable remake of "Night of the Demons") to co-star, eventual wife, mother of his child, and soon to be divorced Rachael "I used to have a career" Bella. Neither of them turn in terribly convincing performances, although I'll admit this is the fault of the pitiful script and likely uninspired direction by an indie duo who've apparently gone nowhere since. Sad to say, this is no great loss to the world of cinema. William "Trespass" Sadler's laughable monologue is the only other element of note in this snoozer, and I do hope his paycheck was worth the embarrassment. That some benighted reviewer somewhere dared to compare this pap to Oliver Stone's "Natural Born Killers" is risible at best. Desperation viewing only, despite Ms. Bella's pretty perkies, and another stain on the reputation of my local public library's video buyer.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Is there anything new in this one...?
axile0079 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Jimmy & Judy left me disappointed because I did not find anything original in the movie. While watching the movie many other better flicks similar to this one, came into my mind like Natural Born Killers, Badlands, Kalifornia etc.

And I kept on hoping that there may be some twist in the plot but nothing happened. Another problem with this one is that the characters never got the time to develop.

The acting was ordinary. Both Jimmy and Judy looked normal teens acting weirdly !I don't know why? Nothing was said or shown. So all in all you may miss this one and better watch any of the above mentioned movies.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wow... I get to be first on an IMDb comment? Sweet! Annnnyway...
ptiming5 February 2006
I really enjoyed this film. I don't think I'll be giving away any spoilers here. First off, this film is shot entirely from a first person perspective, ala Blair Witch, but seriously, do NOT let that scare you away.

The titular characters are played by Edward Furlong and Rachael Bella (both of whom attended the premiere in SF tonight). You'll remember Eddie Furlong as the whiny little saves-the-future brat from Terminator II, though you'd do much better to remember his performances in American History X and Pecker, as he's long since shrugged off the child-actor label in these latter parts. Rachael Bella you may recall as the "crazy chick" who witnesses the bizarre death of her teenage friend in the beginning of The Ring (boy, I really hope I didn't give anything away there).

The story unfolds exclusively from the perspective of Jimmy's video camera. He's a video junkie (not unlike the neighbor character in American Beauty) and feels the need to "document" every important event in his life on tape (including certain aspects of his parents' relationship, and there's no way in hell I'm giving up *that* spoiler!).

Jimmy's been in love with Judy all of his life, their parents having apparently been friends for quite some time, but that love has been unrequited until now. He's a social misfit and outcast in all aspects of his life. He finally approaches Judy to show her how he's taken revenge on those that have wronged her in school (herself also being a social outcast, apparently) causing her to instantly fall in love with him.

The remainder of the film is a high tension tale of the love between the two star-crossed lovers and the misadventures they become entangled in as they explore a life of crime and independence. No, this is not a retelling of such "on the lamb" films as Natural Born Killers, True Romance, or The Devil's Rejects. They are not crazed teens on a killing spree, out to kill everyone who gets in their way. They do come across in many respects as honest social outcasts who simply end up in the situations they end up in out of circumstance and their purest desire to remain together and not be torn apart. You can, however, feel the influence of the aforementioned films as the story progresses.

I don't want to go into too much detail so as not to be blamed for submitting any spoilers. Suffice to say, the style in which the film is shot is actually somewhat secondary to the story. It does offer a unique perspective, though, on the relationship that is formed by the young couple and how they grow to bond so strongly. This really is a true perspective, incidentally. Not until the very end of the film (mild spoiler here, but not really) are you treated at all to a third person perspective of the action.

According to the Q&A following the premiere, the film was shot with practically no budget and within 15 days in the Kentucky countryside. The casting of Eddie Furlong was a very very fortunate accident when one of the future crewmembers of the production briefly met him at a party and suggested to the writing/directing team that they send him a copy of the script which he fell in love with. Rachael Bella is also very well cast and is beautiful (to say the least) which will appeal to those seeking the voyeuristic nudity and sex which I'm sure will likely be at the heart of some other reviews. Honestly, there really isn't anything explicit here. Jimmy is a first or second year college student suspended from school due to an incident involving his videotaping craze (at least partly to blame for his severe emotional scarring) and Judy is a high school junior or senior and their relationship is typical of that of late teenage/early twenties relationships when it comes to the sexual element (at least from my own personal perspective), so I'm sure you can figure out roughly what to expect.

The film is a love story... with complications. Honestly, what good story ever came out of an uncomplicated love affair? It's the honest portrayals and realistic style in which the movie is filmed that is it's true driving force. I hesitate to say phrases like "edge of my seat", but it is quite definitely apropos for much of this film. I think I'd prefer to just come out and say that this flick grabbed me by the balls and at no time did it really let go. It's a very fast-moving story once things really get to happening and I soon found myself totally engrossed.

I'm running out of words here, sadly, and I doubt I'm doing the film quite the justice it is deserved. I suppose my rush to try and provide this very first review of the movie (on IMDb at any rate). All I really do have to say, in the end, is that I truly hope that this film gets picked up for distribution (I believe it was mentioned that this has already happened, or is definitely in the works) and if you get any chance to see it, I highly recommend that you do. Hence my "10" here on IMDb... and my "6" on the festival ballot (which only went to "5" = Brilliant!,

see this flick.

pt...
18 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
kind of lame
mccaveryrichard12 August 2008
The trailer makes it look good, like a typical bonnie & Clyde movie.

However it wants to be to much like true romance or natural born killers In the way that the two characters care for nothing but each other and would rather die than be apart.

some of the camera work is a bit amateurish too. no matter how much negativity surrounds the movie. if u see the trailer you'll watch it anyway, well I would.

But if u know your movies, you'll be disappointed.

p.s Im only writing move because u have to write 10 lines to post, which is stupid. Also I think its typical of a cult leader to demand sex from the females in the group. I cannot believe people join these cults and believe the garbage thats drilled into them.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Good Independent Film
cp-williams3 September 2007
When I saw this title I thought, Woo hoo another crappy film to watch and then to comment on, but what I didn't know was the reality of this movie was so real that it made me think really hard of what this world is like for kids who are not blessed to have parents and friend's to care for them.

After watching this movie I found my self in a daze, sorta like a trance (something I always find myself in when watching these kind of movies') and I knew that all the things that Jimmy and Judy went through were things that could and DO happen to teenagers ever day. And to put things into perspective and to tell a beautiful story of two VERY misunderstood kids and their problems with everyday life. I now know that life can be hell and that without someone to talk about it to you, you can really go crazy.

People need to look outside of their own home and see what happened's when kids (mostly teenagers) can do with one gun a camera and a misunderstood life.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not bad, but Video X is much better.
MBunge29 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
JIMMY AND JUDY 2006 Written and Directed by Randall Rubin and Jon Schroeder (We Share Everything!) Starring Edward Furlong, Rachael Bella, William Sadler, James Eckhouse, Gay Storm and A. J. Buckley.

This is the first review I've ever written that has to start out with a recommendation to see a different movie. If you see a copy of Jimmy and Judy at your local video store, don't rent it until you know if they've also got a copy of Video X. The latter film is sooooooo much better than the former.

Jimmy and Judy is (shockingly!) the story of Jimmy (Edward Furlong) and Judy (Rachael Rubin). Jimmy is a pasty, pudgy 20something with a Holden Caulfieldesque sense of alienation from society. He's back at home with his Mom and Dad after being kicked out of college for videotaping his roommate's suicide. Judy is a pretty high school girl who is, for reasons never explained or defined, desperately unhappy and looking for someone to which she can cling. Jimmy's had a crush on Judy since they were kids and decides this is his moment to reach out to her, which he does by getting revenge on several other kids he sees abusing Judy one day. Judy, while initially repelled by Jimmy, eventually warms up to the only person she thinks loves her or pays attention to her. The movie spends about an hour just defining these characters and their relationship, then Judy runs over a guy with their car. T hat sets the couple on the run and down a slippery path of crime, false hope and murder. Oh, and Jimmy incessantly video tapes everything they do.

This isn't a bad film so much as it is a film in conflict with its basic conceit. The movie is shot hand-held video style, with the camera being passed back and forth between Jimmy and Judy, but unlike The Blair Witch Project or Cloverfield, this movie won't make you motion sick. The camera work in Jimmy and Judy is much steadier and more like a traditional film than the herky-jerky visual roller-coaster of those other two. But that's a big problem. The whole point of the hand-held video stuff is to give the story a veneer of realism, a sense that something like this could really happen. But the camera movement and imagery in Jimmy and Judy is so obviously controlled and planned and managed that it ruins any sense that it's something actually happening. Instead of sucking you in, it creates a distance between you and the story. That distance, in turn, let's you see that Jimmy and Judy aren't very realistic characters. They may resemble ordinary-but-troubled folks in theory, but in practice they don't act or talk anything like real people. While Furlong and Bella both give nice performances, you can't ever forget they're performances.

The second half of the movie is also problematic because it stops being about Jimmy and Judy and starts being about all these other low-life, criminal types they run into. The things that occur in the second hour of the story don't really flow out of who Jimmy and Judy are and how they relate to each other, but instead erupt when new characters enter the story and push our lovebirds in one direction or another. It's particularly noticeable when the movie suddenly morphs into a pseudo-documentary about this backwoods, drug dealing, almost-cult leader called Uncle Rodney (William Stadler).

I also have to say the story gets stupider as it goes along. When it's just Jimmy and Judy in the first half, what happens mostly makes sense. When they hit the road and the terrible stuff starts happening, that's no longer the case. Characters start behaving the way the script needs them to behave, even if there's no real reason for it. There's a point in the story where Jimmy by all rights should be killed, but instead he's just beaten up a bit and allowed to live solely because the movie isn't ready to end yet.

For all that, though, Jimmy and Judy isn't an aggressively bad film. Furlong and Bella are good, there's a significant amount of female nudity (including a lot of looks at Bella's bosom) and if you've ever had a bit of Holden Caulfield in you when you were young, you might emotionally connect with this story.

But as I mention at the start, Video X is sooooooo much better than this film. I t's largely the same story but smarter, funnier, more shocking and more real. But if you can't get your hands on a copy of Video X, Jimmy and Judy isn't that awful as a substitute.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Best Film at San Francisco Film Festival
staceyedwards016 February 2006
"Jimmy and Judy" is truly amazing. The script is solid, and the story, impactive. After watching this movie at the best screening I have ever been at, I was left thinking about this film for days. The audience went totally nuts and afterward everyone joined in for a standing ovation. I really connected with the characters, and fell in love with Jimmy and Judy. They represent the things this society wants to hide, and the story will connect with you. Eddie Furlong is absolutely fantastic and this performance is one of the best of his career. Also, the chemistry he has with Rachael is something unlike I have ever seen on screen and one can feel the love these two feel for each other. These characters bring out truth and real life. "Jimmy and Judy" is a must see and will become a cult classic.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Creating dialogue and exploring the depths of a disenfranchised youth generation....and its really good!
cstone012711 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
So often I see a film that is entertaining, but is usually not saying much of anything. Jimmy and Judy is far from one of these films. The intensity of teen love and angst seeps from the pores of Edward Furlong and Rachel Bella. This modern day "Bonnie and Clyde" story reveals the motivations for these lovers that set the screen ablaze. Drugs, sex, nudity, s&m, and murder amongst suburbanites in Middle America...wicked! Jimmy and Judy push the envelope in all that they do, and the film follows the same suit. A story worth seeing and listening too. It will be intense, but it's validity in both the beauty and unsightliness of life is provoking.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Marvelous acting
rapbonelou10 February 2008
Jimmy and Judy is a shared journey exploring the love, idealism and romance of youth set against the forces of mental instability and aggression. The self-filming style added greatly to the drama and immediacy. I was constantly wondering if I would get to keep seeing what was coming next. Sometimes I could see where it was heading, other times I was surprised, even shocked by the turns of events.

Great dramatic tension, wonderful acting and complex, believable characters. The actors were well cast for their parts. I was totally immersed in their performances.

This film is superb. I highly recommend it.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Cult Classic!!!
gurumovie2 November 2007
Saw this movie at the Idaho film festival and it totally blew me away.

Here's a review:

What do violent and deranged meth-heads, your mother ramming a dildo up the ass of your closet-transvestite father, and the burning flesh of the guy you just ran over in your car all have in common? Why, they're all things you would eagerly capture on film, of course!

If you're Jimmy Wright, that is. Edward Furlong co-stars in the film "Jimmy and Judy" as a junior-college dropout plagued by the deceptively normal facade of suburbia and obsessed with his hand-held video camera.

Jimmy's camera thus becomes the lens for the entire film. Fortunately, directors Randall Rubin and Jon Schroder have crafted "Jimmy and Judy" with a cogent plot, raw, fearless script, and superb casting that prevail over the shaky, blurry, amateur style that made "The Blair Witch Project" so irritating.

At its core, "Jimmy and Judy" is a tale of luckless lovers. Jimmy has loved Judy (Rachael Bella) since childhood, and has the tapes to prove it. The timid Judy is likewise an outcast at her high school. When Jimmy, never one to let social norms hinder his impulses, takes revenge on Judy's bullies and shows her the footage, she is wooed and the two embark on an anarchic ride through the forgotten states of Middle America.

Throughout their misadventures- ones involving drug abuse, sexual violence, and gunplay- Jimmy and Judy manage to retain an innocence not afforded to characters in flicks with similar concepts such as "Natural Born Killers." What provides this naive sincerity is the rare chemistry Furlong and Bella invoke coupled with the film's intimate home-video style. By the time Jimmy plugs a cop in the head in a frantic getaway scene, we're rooting for the pair and blaming it all on bad luck and the simple desire to not be alone.

In a word, "Jimmy and Judy" is ballsy. Not many indie films making claims for edginess have pulled off this sort of material with such honesty. A good example is Jimmy's scene where he first meets the messiah of the cultish smack-factory commune. While "Uncle Rodney" (William Sadler), clad in tattoos and ripped flannel, preaches his thoughts on uniting the "garbage culture" of society in his dark, tattered shack, he brandishes a knife and pets the hair of a tweaked-out junkie aching for the fix only he can give. Amid this resonance of dueling banjos and the dark underbelly of American life, we are bizarrely gripped by the depravity. That something so far gone from most audiences' experience also rings so true is a testament to the film's finesse.

The filming technique is a theme that's worth examining from a larger outlook. Jimmy and Judy alternate handling the camera, documenting everything from a genuinely sweet haircut to an attempted rape. At first, Judy repeatedly asks, "Why do you have to film everything?" Jimmy just wants to document all the important parts of his life. But in today's world of MySpace and Facebook photo narcissism and a grand jury sending journalist Josh Wolf to prison for not yielding videotapes of a protest, how much photo documentation is too much? Are we on digital media overload? The filmmakers take an opportunity to pose contemporary questions with this unique narrative.

Aside from any politicized tangents, Jimmy and Judy are at the heart of the film. We pity them for their bad decisions, but that pity is accompanied by empathy and endearment. Aw, c'mon Judy, snorting drugs isn't good, we find ourselves thinking. Watching their devolution becomes as emotional as if we were bumping along down lost roads with the collapsing pair themselves. It's not a film for the squeamish, but what truly good love story can go without this much gore, tragedy and risk?

This movie has a weird way of sucking you in and making you forget that you are watching a scripted film and not someone's home movies. Edward Furlong is at his best and won a best acting award for his performance. This movie is hard core indie, so don't bother to watch if you are expecting some cheesy happy ending and are not prepared to be shocked.

Jimmy and Judy, for better or worse, is in your face and not afraid to to be there. Jimmy and Judy is all sex, drugs, and more sex and drugs. This is way more like Sid and Nancy, not Alex and Emma.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Display of a Mentally Unstable Mind!
The_Juggalo55883 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Its seldom a movie, so accurately depicts the Ravagings of an unstable mind, so clearly and graphicly. Its not uncommon for a person suffering feelings of neglect, and truly believing he's/she's worthless to have cruel and violent thoughts. The difference is very few people act on those thoughts.

I read a comment on this film by someone else, Who kept going down a list of things he/she didn't like, Rather than pointing out the entire point this film was pursuing. After all, Natural born killers is the same thing, but filmed differently.

There's one thing about this movie you can compare is that In both stories, the killer couple is consisted of 2 lovebirds who believe they are hated, unwanted, abused, and neglected by everyone, and everything... Except each other!

The difference is the body count, and How in Natural born Killers, They glorify Serial Murder. This movie depicts how One character of the couple, Is afraid, and weak minded,In desperate need of acceptance. The other is unstable and completely detached. Together they form a couple that Truly and utterly has no Ability to feel for others misery, When their own happiness is At stake. At least this is my interpretation.

Jimmy And Judy, They meet at an odd point in each-others lives, circumstances pull them closer together as the story evolves, They explode in a violent, but fluid motion set forth by their own Stupidity, and misery. Its as accurate a depiction of A Rebel without a clue, as any movie of recent years.

Maybe Its not for everyone, and maybe its not filmed to be glorified, and "Normal" but its a wild ride and image of what Unstable minds, given the right nudge, can do. not a family movie, Not a movie for the weak stomached, But nevertheless, Its a movie That takes you to limits many films are unable... To the edge!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A movie you'll want to watch again.
cynthupacki31 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Everyone is stuck in the house due to this COVID19 lockdown. There's no better time for reviewing movies.

I found this movie great! All parts of this movie have been uploaded onto Youtube, so it's free to watch for anyone. (At least while I'm writing this). As graphic as the movie is, it's quite funny too. I don't know if other reviews latched onto how hilarious this movie was, even though it's dealing with quite dark subject matter.

It's a Romeo & Juliet story, the lovers were star crossed and bound for their fate from the beginning. The characters have a few mental problems. Their mental state is going downhill as the movie progresses, shown by their impulsive behaviour and strange decision making, which pushes them into more and more dangerous situations.

Ok Jimmy first. This is just my opinion, not other people's. Furlong is 30 in this movie and looks 30. In the initial script, he was supposed to be a teenager, and that makes sense. Although the movie deals with his character compassionately, I can't. Looking at a 30 year old man, I'm not gonna feel sorry for him and I feel like he is psychologically manipulating the girl. I don't believe he is naive and in love. But looks aside, Furlong has understood this character well and his acting is exceptional. You can really feel his extreme mood swings and impulsivity, as well as occasional glimpses into his darker obtrusive thoughts, such as when he says he wants to grate his balls with a cheese grater. To feel something is better than feeling numb I suppose.

Edward Furlong has always been able to understand the emotional nuances of complex characters, and convey this clearly for audiences - that's his strength. But he's not one of those actors that can do flawless accents, or mannerisms or things like that. But here in Jimmy and Judy, his physical acting has also stepped up. (or at least it was not a let down) I like his mannerisms, intonations, the way he delivers lines and so on.

Let's move onto Judy. I found her a bore. She looks like a grown ass woman trying to potray a 15yr old, with cute broody teenage looks that seem odd on her wrinkled forehead. Her acting was a bit lacklustre. She is supposed to be sexy but I just didn't get it. Just because you are flashing doesn't mean sexy. She is also kinda a spineless character. First she says she doesn't like Jimmy, then she does. Then she doesn't like the camera, then she does. She doesn't like flashing/ nudity, then she does. Then she is quickly shoplifting when she was more or less a good girl a week ago. She's incredibly passive and stupid. She tries to assert herself a little bit, but Jimmy is always overbearing emotionally and also one ups her intellectually. If I could feel something from her, like she was depressed or irrational or crazy in love, I might forgive her but I can't feel anything from her. In the movie, other than for being a bit of a loner, she doesn't seem to have too many issues and is completely forgettable. She should have tried to play a character that's more depressed or volatile or something.

Ok moving on from those 2 characters...the supporting cast is excellent. The psychiatrist at the start is hilarious, jimmy's parents have an outrageous scene, uncle rodney is charismatic, funny and intimidating, the coke head is super irritating and scary.

And lastly: ppl are complaining about the hand held video footage being unrealistic, like when Jimmy still records himself being beaten up. I don't find it so odd for his character, I think it's really in line with what some teenagers would do. Bryer Schmegelsky and Kam McLeod did it in real life, right?

Anyway, even if it WAS unrealistic, it doesn't take away from the movie. For example, Rose drops her 30 million dollar necklace into the ocean in Titanic. Isn't that stupid and unrealistic?

The film has several weak points but I'm giving it 10/10 as it leaves an indelible mark on your film watching memory and it's a movie where you'll probably want to watch some bits again.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Jimmy and Judy,a great surprise
deni-stojan19 September 2009
Jimmy and Judy is one of the most original movies I ever saw.I watched it a week ago and I was so impressed by this movie.First of all,both main and supporting characters were played perfectly and this person one view is just awesome.Story is pretty good,sick kid filming everything he think is important and it's almost every moment of his life.He met this girl played by beautiful Rachel Bella and they start their weird road trip.Movie is very realistic and shows examples society is trying to hide from public.I can say it's a must see movie that will make think about it for next two days.

I didn't think this will be something extraordinary when I started watching it,I knew it's a low-budget and independent movie and I didn't expect too much from it.But it came out as a big surprise.

But,even though movie is great I can't say it's ideal and i'll give it 9 out of ten.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Its Not Perfect but Its Not Awful
fridaynightmovie24 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This movie caught my attention a while ago but because of reviews I was very skeptical about watching it. The movie is a dark look at how far teens will go for their crazy definitions of love. Yes, the acting has its weak points (not so much the two leads but those surrounding them) and yes, it may go a bit over the top, but for those of us that have fallen in love as teens it may ring some bells. It chronicles a relationship from its addictive start to its overdosed finish. Many kids think they have found the one and that no one will ever understand them or love them like this person does. Its a feeling that will make you do nearly anything. While this movie may take that to a level no one ever dreamed about when they met their first boyfriend or girlfriend it does make you realize that teens are volatile, powerful, and capable of things their parents don't want to even think about. This movie takes the viewer to a dark place but take the "excessive and unnecessary" nudity as the reality of teens sex-ting and take into consideration the gore we subject ourselves to when watching Saw, you might find the meaning makes these things less of a draw back and more of a necessary evil when talking about the reality of troubled teens. Its not the end all beat all but its worth a watch.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed