Aliens of the Deep (2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
39 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
It didn't flow...
RosanaBotafogo12 March 2023
Worms nearly two meters long, blind crabs, a bio-mass of white shrimp. James Cameron takes the viewer on a journey to another world, an incredible underwater adventure that gives an extraordinary look at incredible creatures that live in an alien world, without sunlight, and where the water can be close to freezing or boiling temperature. Could these alien life forms be clues about life on other planets?

I was expecting something more terrifying, visually beautiful, narratively poetic, scientifically necessary, cute and cool... Long and a little boring or I just wasn't in the mood for this cute undersea movie... Beautiful images, beautiful soundtrack, boring theme, and boring... It didn't flow...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Vent your frustrations.
southdavid19 March 2021
So, this is an odd one. "Aliens of the Deep" is clearly designed to be viewed on an IMAX screen - which, of course, I wasn't. I was watching it on my TV via Disney Plus. So , visually it's not as impressive as old James Cameron intended - but as a documentary, how is it? Too long, and only interesting about half the time.

Veteran film director James Cameron continues his obsession with all things deep sea by arranging an expedition, to the hydrothermal vents and investigate the life that thrives in such toxic and inhospitable environments. Accompanying the marine biologists are a team of NASA scientists eager to learn what they can about the technology needed to explore similarly difficult terrain in Space.

When I say it's interesting half the time, I mean it's interesting when it's showing their actual discoveries. The vents have their own ecosystems linked to the heat generated by the superheated water, shrimp and crab like creatures exist in large numbers and tube worms mix around the deep sea submersibles. They experiment with taking samples of rocks and with how close they can get to the vents.

It's less interesting when it's using CGI to imagine creatures during fantasies about what it might be like to explore the seas of another planet. I guess the idea is that it's supposed to fire your imagination, but for me it was mostly padding what was already a slow-moving experience. It doesn't spend anything like enough time doing the actual interesting thing it does, showing you the actual creatures that live in these environments. The human stories of the scientist are generally a bit dull, though some of the film detailing the issues that the expedition has are more interesting.

I've spent a lot of time with space and undersea documentaries recently and unfortunately, despite some decent moments, this is a bit of a misfire.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Abyss
jldmp124 February 2006
A failure on several levels...

Throughout his repertoire, Cameron has set out to film water, or more precisely, 'liquidity' -- it's his customary point of departure -- what world could be more cinematic?. It follows that he will try to make parallels between deep ocean and space exploration.

Cameron is also an unabashed showoff, so he must clutter every visual with gadgetry -- the 'look what I can do' factor -- as an unsubtle wink at the audience...every movie he makes.

The deep ocean photography should have been more than enough, but he then has to make a push for SETI and other 'cutting edge' research.

And therein lies a big problem. Cameron uses the most fecklessly infantile animation ever wedged into a big-budget movie, complete with little green men with sped-up voices (extended DVD version), and NASA probes that make noise in the vacuum while firing the retrorockets...this is no way to bolster science.

It all concludes with "The Abyss" finale of mirrored 'aliens' making 'friends' in the deep...how can one push forward cinematically by repeating one's own worst clunker?
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
actual review of the movie
pklekn21 February 2005
OK.. i was super excited to see this movie.. i didn't care that the 3-d glasses were giving me a mild headache and i had to cock my head and squint to make things go into "3-d focus" sometimes. The Movie was awesome until the end when they showed the computer rendered graphics of what they thought the actual aliens might look like.. that was a super bad way to end a good film. Also.. it was WAY TO SHORT FOR THE MONEY I SPENT. what i'm saying is, they had a lot of really good underwater footage of animals a person does not get to see in action very often at all.. so instead of showing them for 10-20 seconds, why not show them for at least 5 minutes each, and maybe talk about what animal it is. I mean c'mon these people are marine biologists, and all they say is "neat, cool, look at that" i mean DUH!! if i was there, that is what i would say to!!! tell me something i don't know. the movie was so short they should've shown the animals for way longer, i would not have gotten bored seeing them... to bad i don't even know what they are called, because the retards just said "wow, thats cool" instead of "this is this kind of animal. this is how it survives, etc..." I don't regret going to the movie. but i just wish they would've shown more of the footage they had, and the ideas about exploring space were cool and informative, but i really hated the computer graphics stuff they did. they could've shown those crazy octopus things for like 10 minutes and i would not have gotten bored with the image at all.... and the same goes for basically all the animals they ran into down there.
34 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
James Cameron's Undersea Journey Is A Cool, If Not Transcendent IMAX Experience
jaredpahl19 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
In the wake of the overwhelming success of Titanic, writer-director James Cameron took a break from making traditional Hollywood pictures to pursue his love for deep sea exploration. In the process, we got two IMAX documentaries from Cameron. The first was Ghosts of the Abyss, which followed Cameron and a team of experts as they explored the undersea wreckage of the Titanic. His follow-up documentary, Aliens of the Deep, sees Cameron and a new group of scientists return to the bottom of the ocean; this time to get a glimpse of some of the most remarkable creatures and ecosystems on the planet.

Aliens of the Deep is a 47-minute IMAX documentary, originally shown in 3D. It follows a team of explorers comprised of engineers, marine biologists, NASA scientists, and one Oscar-winning filmmaker, as they take a series of high-tech submersibles to the hydrothermal vents at the bottom of ocean. The short length doesn't allow for a developed narrative regarding the team. Instead, we get the condensed highlights of the trip. We meet the crew, see the sights, and speculate on the importance of such missions. Aliens of the Deep mostly serves as something like an extremely big-budget home movie, with James Cameron inviting us to experience all of the best moments of the expedition.

However, apart from the documentary footage of the deep sea voyage, there are a few sequences speculating on missions to discover similar underwater life on Jupiter's moon, Europa. These sequences are surprisingly well-animated and engrossing. Cameron suggests that the water under the ice of Europa may harbor life without the need of the sun in the same way that Earth's hydrothermal vents support organisms who thrive at the bottom of the ocean. The possible similarities of Earth and Europa's oceans are the most interesting scientific questions raised in Aliens of the Deep, which otherwise consists of looking at neat underwater scenery and hearing the scientists exclaim, "Wow!", and "Look at that!".

That is not to say that the underwater visuals are not often spectacular. While more time than needed is spent looking at the submarine equipment and murky rock formations, there are indeed some incredible sights in Aliens of the Deep. The mysterious silk-like invertebrate, flowing across the glass bubble of Cameron's sub, is a enduring take away from the film. A lot of time is spent on the hydrothermal vents and the massive swarms of shrimp and other sea life that huddle around them. Thankfully, the sheer mystery and sense of discovery keeps these less-than- remarkable sights interesting.

There is more than enough in Aliens of the Deep to recommend experiencing. It is well shot, its profiled scientists are colorful real-life characters, it is sometimes engaging on an intellectual level, and it stands as a very cool visual experience. Some may find the space exploration speculation to be a little corny, but I really bought into it. The 99-minute extended version (which I have not seen) no doubt adds context to the team's expedition, but the theatrical version is still worth a look. If you are a James Cameron fan, if you are interested in the mysteries of the deep ocean, or if you just want to take a visual trip somewhere completely new, find the biggest screen possible and see this solid documentary.

73/100
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
James Cameron and co probe the depths of the Ocean for strange exotic creatures
disdressed1215 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
wow.this is a truly beautiful piece of work.it is a documentary By James Cameron.Cameron and his crew basically explore the depth of the ocean,looking g for clues to life in outer space.they meet some very beautiful creature on their journey an some very strange ones.the movie is beautifully photographed,giving the viewer an astounding look at life under the sea.it is a slow moving film at times,ad veers off into talking about the people involved and other projects they are working on.i don't mean to be callous.i believe the people involved should certainly be introduced to the viewer,as all involved make a worthy contribution to the film.However,in a film such as this,the focus should be more on the creatures found,than the human beings.This movie sometimes plays like a National Geographic film,many of which also suffer from the same flaw.that said, this is very watchable film.just have your hand on the fast forward button. 6/10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Questionable peer and situational authenticity but thoroughly immersing
StevePulaski20 December 2014
NOTE: This is a review of the theatrical, forty-seven minute cut of James Cameron and Steven Quale's Aliens of the Deep, not the ninety-nine minute version released on DVD.

Director James Cameron, the director of Avatar and Titanic, the two highest-grossing motion pictures ever made, has always had a fascination with science, space exploration, and the unknown, which makes him the logical person to make Aliens of the Deep, a forty-seven minute, theatrically-released documentary concerning underwater space exploration. Cameron and a crew of highly-qualified explorers and marine biologists justify underwater exploration by the idea that it would help understand the limitlessness of outer space and implore that we must discover the relatively unexplored ocean floor before we can begin exploring space.

For this brief documentary, Cameron and company take us deep underwater, in small submarines to explore the creatures that live deep in the treacherous oceans. Cameron, his co-director Steven Quale, who went on to direct such disaster films as Final Destination 5 and Into the Storm, and two additional cinematographers Vince Pace and Ron Allum photograph this film evocatively, exploiting the ocean for its natural beauty by showing the magnificent creatures within its ecosystem. In addition, editors Matthew Kregor and Fiona Wight - undoubtedly working off of Cameron's influence - construct this film as if it's a work of fiction, splicing in narrations and cohesive, story-like pacing to the film, adding an unexpected layer of tidiness.

The film works up until we listen to the interactions between the biologists, the doctors, and Cameron, which sound perfunctory to say the least, as if they're complimenting the aforementioned narrative qualities of the film. Their comments often sound sarcastic or too quick to joke, making them unnatural and not the realistic thing certain individuals would say under these situations. It's as if Cameron and company didn't think people would appreciate a lot of scientific jargon, so they simplified the story and the dialog in such a way that DisneyNature films often give their animal characters celebrity voices to humanize their lives and actions.

Aliens of the Deep is an interesting stepping stone for someone looking to exercise their love for underwater exploration, marine biology, or simply the thrill of the unknown, but its editing structure and pacing make its peer and situational authenticity highly questionable.

Directed by: James Cameron and Steven Quale.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Big Disappointment
room10224 September 2005
When it comes to action movies, James Cameron is one of my favorite directors. In particular, "The Abyss" and "Terminator 2" are two of my all-time favorite movies. Like others, I'm disappointed to see that since "Titanic" Cameron is only making documentaries and I'm looking forward to see his "Battle Angel" (currently scheduled for a 2007 release), which will be his first feature in 10(!) years.

I didn't really like "Expedition: Bismarck" and "Ghosts of the Abyss", so my expectations from "Aliens of the Deep" weren't that high. Still, I got disappointed. I watched the 95-min DVD version and felt like I was watching a "behind the scenes" featurette of the real movie.

The movie promises to show us "aliens" from the bottom of the sea. It surprised me that during the entire duration, you don't get to see more than 10 minutes of that - most of them are the same creatures. TV shows like the excellent "The Blue Planet (2001)" by the BBC already gave us all these creatures (and many others not shown here) in a MUCH clearer view and better photography.

Instead, this movie focuses on showing all the people and equipment involved in making the dives. It was interesting in the first 10 minutes and it would have been alright if I wanted to know more about the making of the movie. But it's not interesting to see Cameron and crew for 95 minutes discussing how things should be made.

Except for the few short computer animations in the movie, I got a feeling that I was watching an unedited material. Cameron puts himself and lots of people with Ph.D. in front of the camera, but he is more interested in showing us them playing, making faces, modeling to the cameras and having really shallow discussions instead of giving some in-depth analysis of the subject.

Most of the underwater dialog consists of "Wow" and "That is amazing". The narration is horrible right from the beginning and the lowest point - for me - was during the explanation how these creatures were first discovered, which actually used the phrase: "These scientists went like 'Wow!'".

Most of the underwater material shows the submarines and the people instead of the creatures. Is it because they didn't find what they wanted and didn't have enough material to shows us? When you finally get to see some creatures, you have absolutely no explanations about them. So many educated scientists around and you don't even get to know the names of the creatures! You just watch it like you would if you dived yourself. Cameron himself sums it pretty well in one scene, when a beautiful jelly-like creature passes and he says "I have no idea what that is". I don't blame you - you're not a scientist, but what are all the people around for?

Summing it all up - this movie was a big disappointment and boring enough for me to fast-forward parts of it. If you want to see the creatures promised here, see another documentary; if you want to see a good Cameron project - go and watch any of his brilliant action movies. But save yourself from watching this.
45 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I Think Many Have Missed the Point...INCREDIBLE FILM!!
lemming_eater-128 May 2007
I did not see the IMAX version, so maybe that makes a difference. I just watched the DVD, which was long. However, it seems like a lot of people did not get the point of this movie, which was absolutely excellent and very exciting. We are on the frontier of a lot of exciting discoveries, and leaps and bounds are being made in marine exploration.

People complain that the animals shown were not explained enough. That's because THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS. They say "Oooh, look at that! Wow! What is it?". This is exploration, people. They are finding new types of animals. If they can't capture it, they are going to have to take pictures of it and study how it moves etc. etc. and go through a long process of figuring out what it is and how it lives.

The point of this movie wasn't necessarily to show pretty pictures of all of the animals, although I was stunned by the visual beauty of it. The point was to tie marine exploration to space exploration, hence the title. I loved seeing what goes on with the machinery and finding out all of the different people involved in this research, showing us all the different groups that come together from different fields to explore together and work on their individual goals. A lot of people complained that they didn't want to see the engineers and the subs and robots, but the people who do that incredible work should get more credit than they often do and should definitely be introduced in the movie. This technology is absolutely amazing and the people who do it deserve to brag. They are showing us the incredible things that the human mind can achieve. I also loved seeing how excited they were.

This movie has a lot of very important things to say and did a great job illustrating the massive activity going on in this sector of science. Not only has it made me enthused about the things I'm going to see in my lifetime, it has made me believe that one of those things is probably going to be life on another planet.

After day after day of being depressed about the state the world is in, petty political and religious arguments, seeing this movie definitely made me feel hope for the human race again. These people put most of us to shame. This movie doesn't deserve to get blasted the way it has been and these brilliant folks don't deserve to be called "retards". How silly! So maybe you don't like the way it looked, or thought they should have done something different. Whatever. These guys are ridiculously hardworking, are doing amazing things, and are trying to show the world and let us get in on it. Geez. People just love to insult things.
27 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unmissable educative documentary.
katparker-8646211 July 2018
Aliens of the Deep is what a science documentary ought to be: visually awe inspiring with an amalgamation of real and rendered scenes and perhaps most importantly- narrated or explained by someone who knows what they are saying and not just reading their lines to cash in a cheque. James Cameron is the narrator, diver and director of this amazing documentary that juxtaposes a deep ocean dive with a space mission to one of the Galilean moons. The banter between the scientists aboard the Russian mission ship and Cameron's enthusiasm is a joy to watch.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Disappointed
casumma18 October 2014
Unfortunately most of the film gets terribly lost in boring exposition about the technology and erroneous dialogue. The narrator's lack of real scientific knowledge is painfully obvious as she struggles to read her script (with the occasional exclamations of "wow" or "that's amazing.) The various scientists' excruciating descriptions of technology sadly detract from the real stars of the show (the actual animal life), which the viewer will see only infrequently. A much better example of deep ocean cinematography can be found in the BBC series titled The Blue Planet narrated by David Attenborough and other related BBC titles. If you are watching with kids hoping to inspire their curiosity about science then PLEASE give this title a miss and move on to something that won't bore them to death.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A must see movie for all ages
dgreen2-212 March 2006
This movie had phenomenal 3D effects which rather than serving as a distraction or a novelty served to enhance my enjoyment. At the bottom of the Atlantic we find that in the absence of light life can be supported by heat - heat on the ocean floor with temperatures in excess of 700 degrees generated by underwater chimneys. Despite these extreme conditions many varied and beautiful life forms are found in abundance. In addition to exploring underwater sea life this movie includes a glimpse into the possibilities of discovering life on another planet's moons. The graphics demonstrated one way that a deep space probe could penetrate 3 to 16 miles of a moon's frozen exterior. I highly recommend this movie.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I guess getting a free poster didn't hurt, but nice 3D IMAX
ryangilmer00713 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
James Cameron does a bang up job on the cool looking IMAX-3D adventure to the depths of the sea and beyond.

The futuristic aspect and effects get to be a bit much, but otherwise it is enjoyable, educational, brief, and somewhat enlightening.

Effects--> the computer rendered graphics of aliens was a bad way to end the film, but that is Cameron's own belief/touch. One cannot fault him for what he truly believes in and the effects aren't bad in a cheesy way, just a different way to end an educational film (not really a spoiler since aliens are on the poster and in the preview).

Brief--> All IMAX (except for feature length Hollywood) are short, with the ending it probably was short enough, but could have been longer with more oceanographic footage (an interesting note is that DVDs of IMAX movies seem to have extended versions) Which begs the question of if they are going to charge $30 or so for the DVD and you get extended footage, why spend $8-15 to see a cool documentary like flick on the IMAX 70mm screen? For the most part IMAX is the only place for 3D and thus a reason to pop down the dough. Plus a lot of Zoos and other institutions of education which show films like this tend to have giveaways of the movies official posters and such, so supporting them and possibly winning merchandise is an additional incentive for the decent to very good experience.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Is That All There Is?
yespat14 March 2005
When I saw James Cameron on The View when he was promoting this movie, I could not wait to see it. I love nature shows and the way he talked about it, the movie would be filled with many many kinds of undersea creatures never before seen. As the movie did not even play in my state, I drove over 3 states to see it. After seeing it, I can see why it was not more widely distributed.

The movie seemed to me to be more fitting to be played as something on career day for grade school. This movie would be good PR for trying to interest children in becoming marine biologists. It was not, as Cameron said, filled with unusual sea creatures. As a matter of fact, in the clip that he showed on The View, he showed all the creatures that I'd never seen before so by the time I saw the film, there was nothing new to see. And not only that, the percent of the film where creatures were shown was not that great. I think they spent more time talking to the scientists and looking at the submarines than they were showing creatures. It should have been called "Submersibles of the Deep".

If you have an interest in deep sea submersibles and the actual scientists that operate these pieces of equipment or if you are a grade schooler with an interest in seeing yourself as a marine biologist when you grow up, this movie is for you. If, however, you fit neither category, save your money.

One thing I don't understand is why was it billed as an IMAX feature and then play in a multiplex on the tiny screen? The 3-D glasses made me dizzy and were not all that effective.

The best part of this movie occurred when the film broke early on and we got our money back and were invited to see it again for free. At least I did not have to pay to see it.
23 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Definitely worth the money
RWlkrSmith31 January 2005
One of the best things about this movie - specifically with regard to bringing kids to see it - is this: we see attractive, personable scientists who are excited - genuinely _excited_ - to be doing science.

And, of course, the eye candy of the science they're doing - submersibles, robot cameras, and so on. I'm convinced there'll be a few marine biologists twenty years from now who'll remember this movie as the first step on their road to discovery.

I'm raising a lively and inquisitive seven-year-old son, and one of my personal challenges is inoculating him against the pervasive anti-intellectualism of this culture. This movie makes being a marine biologist look cool and fun, and for that I'm profoundly grateful.

The ending _is_ a bit cheesy, but hey - most people like cheese.
28 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting documentary about exploration
Enchorde7 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
How can we learn how to explore other planets in space? By exploring the extreme environments in the deep sea. That is the premise of this documentary. So, to put it clearly, this is not a nature movie that shows a lot of fantastic animals and show us how the ecosystem works down there. This is a movie about how we do to get that knowledge, the technology aspect, the possibilities and unexpected problems. We get to know a few of the explorers thoughts, and strategies how to learn something new, and their visions and dreams (some of which is now reality). Of course, we get to see some of the extreme nature, some really freaky animals, but it is not really the main point 8even though I too wish they could have shown a little more of the animals and plants they studied). If you want to see a nature movie, you should probably pick another movie. If you are into exploration, how to break frontiers in real life (and not science fiction) this is more for you.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Truly Awful
canuckreviewer5 July 2013
I'm a big fan of the Planet Earth series and nature flicks in general, so I thought I'd give this one a try. Wow, what a letdown. Calling this a nature documentary is a stretch, as its really just self-indulgent promotion on the part of the diving crew. The film mostly consists of bland drivel from the crew members about how cool the dive is and how excited they are about it. Amazingly, they barely touch on the subject matter of the dive, the technical challenges, or anything else that could be considered remotely interesting. The simplistic, shallow narrative suggests that the film is intended for young children, yet it is so incredibly boring and slow moving that I can't see how it could captivate an audience of any age, let alone tots with minute attention spans. When you (finally) do see some of the deep sea creatures promised (which you don't see much of), the imagery is well below that of Planet Earth and does little to excite. The commentary, instead of providing interesting facts on the creatures in question, mostly consists of "wow! Isn't that amazing!". The film is short but I didn't even make it to the end. Don't waste your time with this one.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"James Cameron does it again!"
simon-trek18 March 2005
The first movie I ever saw at an IMAX theater was 'Ghosts of the Abyss' or 'Titanic 3D' which was an incredible experience. Seeing that film I believe is the closest thing to really exploring the wreck of the Titanic the images were simply incredible. So I was excited to hear that James Cameron has created a new documentary, this time exploring the wondrous life that exists in the deep ocean.

This film I thought was just as incredible as 'Ghosts of the Abyss' James Cameron's last IMAX documentary. In fact it seems that Cameron is now more attached to creating documentaries. He even says in this film "I love underwater exploration. It's much more fun than any Hollywood film fantasy." Indeed this films takes you on a remarkable journey into life that exists where you least expect it. In a deep, dark and completely fascinating world unlike anything you've see on Earth. I personally think of this film as a real life version of James Cameron's 'The Abyss'.

This film also explores the concept of traveling to 'Europa' one of Jupiter's moons. The moon's surface is covered by ice and oceans exists underneath. So many scientists believe that life may actually exist in these alien oceans. The possibility seems wondrous. So I guarantee you this film will take on a wondrous and magical journey that you will never forget!
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
NASA propaganda film, don't waste your money.
mlgroveman2 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
What a disappointment! I felt so robbed after seeing it that I was inspired to get an IMDb account and so that I could warn others.

I went to this movie after hearing it touted on Talk of the Nation Science Friday. I went expecting to see wondrous sea creatures and learn more about deep ocean life. What I got was a bunch of shiny smiling model-types talking about how important it is to explore space. Half of the crew on the mission filmed worked for NASA, and were practicing for space exploration. This film was clearly meant to convince the public to support funding their NASA projects. Very few animals were shown and almost no information was given about those we did get to see. The film shows the scientists oohing and ahhing over what they saw out their windows, but most of the time they and the narrator didn't even give the creatures' names. There were some high spots, such as a 3-D view of the exploration vehicles floating through a rain of krill. The geological formations were interesting looking, but not well explained. The 3-D seemed wasted on people talking about how great sea and space exploration is.

If you actually want to learn something, stick to PBS
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Challenging and important documentary
Hikage-sama18 January 2007
This was excellent. James Cameron all the way again. It's a shame that I never got to see it on IMAX. This film is important for the future project of the space program subject on NASA as well. James Cameron is one of the planet's most important creators and directors of all time without no doubt. The film was beautiful, excellent and great to follow. There is so little we know about ourselves and our planet. Only in 3.500 meter under the ocean it seems to another world has opened the door for us to discover the truth about humans and the start of everything. This 3D technology helps Cameron and his team to go forward and create an entire new world on film in the upcoming Avatar (2009) and Battle Angel after that.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
more marine life found at your local pet store
mincepie00728 January 2005
If you want to see marine life, save your money and go to your local pet store! The name of James Cameron and NASA are the only two reasons this film made it to the big screen and into the IMAX format. I can not believe that Camron spent 2 years and 40 dives with NASA to make this film. The title of Aliens of the deep is a joke. If you see the movie the ending is a real joke. This movie makes you wonder if this was to be a scientist recruiting show gone bad or what happened.

For a movie that was suppose to show you the marine life below our planet it just doesn't happen. Cameron was more interested in showing himself, the scientist and the equipment 80% of the time. When the marine life is shown it is the same things over and over again...OK James once you tell us what a Black Smoker is we get it! Lucky for me I didn't pay for this movie that only lasted 45 minutes. Yes at only a quarter of an hour your money is not very well spent. The only thing this movie has going for it is the 3-D and one very beautiful creature they show. Other than that go to your local pet store or go scuba diving... I've seen much better marine life doing either of the two. I can see much better shows on the Discovery Channel or PBS thank you. I give this movie 2 stars for 1= it is a movie and 2= it is in English.
21 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really bad! Especially the crew
jensnolting11 April 2022
Just awful with terrible scientists. If they are really scientists at all. All the stupid talking and the claims. So stupid!!! How in the world can this be a documentary?

Hello little fish. The fish is saying: don't fight with me... like really James??

Waste of time!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An unusual look at Jim Cameron. The director in his deep diving expedition.
mhajs14 February 2010
I've been always a fan of James Cameron and his movies. And I will never forgive myself for taking so much time to watch this one. I wish I could had seen it before his newest masterpiece, Avatar, which I'm looking forward to write about too.

I'm still overwhelmed by the whole thing. Cameron presents us some of the people he worked with in this movie and they're all illuminated and wise human beings. It's a pleasure too see these people working together to give us a fantastic adventure. The way Cameron works, how he talks to his crew, how he describes some life forms (''look at this creature, it's beautiful, looks like a dancer'' or ''I could watch this guy all the time, it seems it is glowing from within''), how he films the diving sequences, it's all amazing.

Cameron is a visionary, a surprisingly talented filmmaker, who is also bold and courageous like no other director. This film is inspirational. Watch it for beautiful underwater sequences, the energy of Jim Cameron and the talent and knowledge of all these people that worked with him.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Shrimp and Crabs and Tube Worms..OH MY!!!
LeonLouisRicci8 November 2012
The very minimal footage of the actual "AOTD" is "WOW" inducing, but you would expect much, much, more from a Documentary with this pedigree. We see maybe ten minutes of inspiring "real" footage but not enough to pad this really disappointing delivery of abyss dwellers.

There is much giddy talk that is really embarrassing and seems like a bedtime story for preschoolers and the film as a whole is barely educational. There is one scene showing "the ugliest thing on the planet, look...it has little feet" and that is truly "amazing" but the little guy with the five toes is on screen for about 30 seconds and except for one more really interesting "i have know idea what that is", Angel looking creature (on screen for 30 seconds), that's it.

The rest of the "Aliens of the Deep" consist of shrimp, crabs, and tube worms. Hardly enough for an IMAX and Cinema release.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
10/10
deb-flynn19 December 2020
Will keep this short and sweet. I'm shocked at the rating!! I loved every moment of this documentary!! Well and truly worth the watch!!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed