"The Alfred Hitchcock Hour" Triumph (TV Episode 1964) Poster

(TV Series)

(1964)

User Reviews

Review this title
19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Ed gets romantic, doesn't really work
HEFILM22 July 2013
Ed Begley has several scenes here as an impassioned lover type at heart. He actually handles this pretty well despite severe miscasting. The Jungle atmosphere is well done and especially well photographed. There is a long early sequence on a boat at night that is beautiful to look at.

But it's true the twists don't really hold up once you know what is going on and the final fade out is almost totally baffling despite some repeated shots and off camera lines to try to help it. It's kind of a mess this episode really, starting with the title that seems to have nothing to do with the show, and a lot of it is slow melodrama. It doesn't feel like a Hitchcock episode, to its credit it feels like a feature, but one that doesn't add up. The sum is less than the total of the parts.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Stretches patience and credulity a bit far
darrenpearce1116 August 2017
The only reason I watched this one through was because I like to watch Jeanette Nolan give her dark, atmospheric performances. The screen's black and white Lady Macbeth to Orson Welles plays her part with the usual vocal mocking menace. Despite all this even a great character actress with a scalpel cant pull off the operation of saving this story.

The young missionaries are just too saintly. The plot is wearisome and the ending is exasperating as it asks the viewer to review so much of what is seemed to be known and fill in with highly implausible conclusions.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I think I understand Lucy's motive
elaineteeter-364534 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Lucy and John were the new missionaries. John wanted to be there to help the natives, but Lucy hated the jungle and wanted to leave. Thomas hated his wife ,Mary, because she constantly reminded him that she was the doctor and he was the inept one. Between them, Lucy and Thomas hatched the plot to murder Mary. I understood Thomas' motive, but couldn't understand why Lucy wanted to kill Mary. Lucy commented on how good John was,"perhaps too good," was how Lucy put it, and couldn't bring herself to just leave him. That's why she agreed to murder Mary, but make John believe that it was she, Lucy, in the casket. She mutilated Mary's face unrecognizable. This freed Lucy to leave and also freed Thomas from the wife he hated. What do you guys think of my theory?
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I'm stumped
Qanqor24 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a review, it's a question. Can someone explain the plot to me? I don't get it.

We see the older woman sneak into the younger woman's bedroom with the scalpel. Then we hear a scream, and see someone collapse behind the bed screens. The doctor sees this, but visibly does not participate in any way. But in the end, we find out that the young woman is NOT dead, she's masquerading as the older woman and running off with the doctor. This leaves a couple big questions unanswered: 1) HOW????? How on earth did the sleeping younger woman somehow kill the older woman, who was armed with the scalpel? Huh??? 2) When the young woman's husband digs up the grave and opens the coffin, how did he not *notice* that it wasn't his wife in the coffin, but in fact the older woman? I mean, come on, they didn't look anything alike, and surely he can recognize his *own wife* or not! 3) If the younger woman did somehow manage to kill the older woman, why is she secretly running away and all? She's innocent, it was legitimate self-defense.

In short, I don't get this episode. I've searched the net and cannot find a full plot summary that explains it. I was hoping to find one here, but no such luck. Anyone with answers, please post an explanatory review!

ADDENDUM: I thank patricw for the reply. I've since watched the episode again, and it still doesn't hang together for me. How could the young woman be prepared for the older woman's attack? How could she have known it was going to happen that night? Short of being armed with a gun (we don't hear any shot), how could she have been assured of safely defending herself against a scalpel?

The cut up face is an interesting idea for why the husband doesn't recognize the corpse as not being his wife. Not sure I fully buy it, but at least it's a good attempt at an explanation.
15 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"He may be a weak man, but she is a vision from the devil."
classicsoncall5 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
There are certainly a lot of contrasting opinions for this episode from the reviewers here. Having read them all, I almost don't know what to think. The idea that Brother Thomas Fitzgibbons (Ed Begley) was somewhat smitten with the lovely Lucy Sprague (Maggie Pierce) was apparent, but I don't think it translated into a desire to kill his wife (Jeanette Nolan). It would seem that Lucy was ready for anything that might come her way via Mary Fitzgibbons, including an attack during the middle of the night. But it doesn't make sense to me that she would leave the missionary camp with Thomas, what did that solve if they were simply going to turn around and come right back in a matter of days? It also doesn't seem probable that Thomas could have mangled his wife's corpse to such a degree that Brother John Sprague couldn't figure out who it was in the hand dug grave. And if he did know who it was, why fire at both Thomas and the woman returning in the boat if he knew it to be his wife? Revenge for running off with Thomas? You would think he'd like to at least find out about Lucy's motivation. Just too many imponderables in the story for it to make any kind of sense, which wasn't helped by Hitchcock hot-dogging it in his closing monolog.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What's really going on...
patricw9 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The previous commenter stated that he/she didn't understand what happened. Here's my take on it - the young missionary and his wife arrive to help the older missionary in his duties. The older missionary is married to a bossy nag, and when he sees the young missionary wife, he is smitten. The young missionary wife is not happy with the lifestyle her husband has chosen and drops some hints to the older missionary. He praises her beauty and says he would treasure her. The older missionary knows his wife would be jealous of the attention he is paying the young wife, and basically sets her up to try and murder the young wife. I believe he fakes being asleep while the old missionary wife sneaks into the young wife's bedroom, and the young wife is ready for the attack, thus the the old naggy wife is killed instead. The old missionary and the young wife then bury the old wife; the old missionary tells his native assistant that the young wife died of cholera, and that he must get his wife away from the disease. The assistant doesn't know that the young wife is the one leaving, as she's wearing bug-proof clothing including covering her face. When the young missionary returns from a trip, he's told that his wife died, and that the old missionary and old wife have left. The young missionary presses the assistant to tell him where his wife's grave is, and when he finally finds it, and digs it up, I believe he sees that the body was stabbed, and probably the face was unrecognizable. So, he thinks the old missionary and/or his wife have killed the young wife, and he hurries to the boat dock to exact revenge. He shoots the old missionary, and what he thinks is the old wife, only to find he has shot and killed his own wife, after lifting her veil. He didn't know that his young wife faked her death and was running away with the old missionary. That's what I got out of it...
31 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the best episodes
kacarrol-772-4454473 September 2020
I did not expect to be so bewitched by this episode- at the beginning. I'm not one for this sort of Amazonlike setting wrought with missionaries. However the insecurites , secrets and twisted pysches of the characters made this episode one of the best. The acting was excellent and quite convincing. It goes to show you you never know how these things will turn out in the end.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Muddle in the Jungle
kstephens28 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I came here looking for clarification after seeing "Triumph" and am relieved to see others are as confused as I am!

It would be one thing if the twist had been earned, but you folks are right: this comes out of nowhere. We are given the motive for the turnaround at the end in terms of old Brother Thomas, but what about the young wife? Is she really leaving her husband for the old man?

Presumably all this was done to conceal the murder of the old woman, Mary. But the unearthing of the casket would prove in an instant that this was NOT the young missionary's wife! (Even if her face had been gashed to such a degree as to make her unrecognizable...) If you really wanted to obscure the identity of the body, you'd fare better with some sort of Indian beetle that eats away the flesh...and actually SHOW this in the episode!

The other thing is...why didn't the young missionary's wife simply call out her husband's name when she heard him and saw him shooting Brother Thomas? That would stop him in his tracks and he would drop the gun. Catastrophe averted!

This said, Begley is decent in a role he may not have been perfect for. And Jeanette Nolan is excellent as she usually is in any role she took. I thought watching it, "Why wasn't she a big movie star?" Not even Bette Davis could have done better!

A nice tense atmosphere, and complex things happening in the script with the characters...but an ending that 'capsizes the boat'. Almost literally!
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Fascinating Foray into Human Nature
thefreelancingsamurai5 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The acting, lighting, perspective, dialogue, and camera work are all absolutely top-notch in this episode. There's even a scene in which the moving shadows cast by a cloth fan are utilized to heighten the tension during a dinner conversation. Superb.

The themes were also explored rather well: youth vs. Weariness, justice vs. Vengeance, reputation vs. True fulfillment, etc.

The most overarching theme is the contrast between inherent human evil & inherent human goodness, through which an ironic switch occurs.

It "shows" rather than "tells." For example, the past struggles of the Fitzgibbons' inability to have children, and how that has led them to where they are now, is to be inferred from the dialogue and acting.

In addition, the physical "twist" is less important than what has been revealed about the people involved (particularly Dr. Sprague).

This is one of the most complex character studies I've ever seen come out of this series.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Boring
siegerrob7614 May 2018
On two separate occasions, I couldn't watch this episode to the end as it was just too boring, although it has an interestingly off-kilter non-Hitchcock feel. Jeanette Nolan is initially compelling, especially when talking through an elaborate bug proof covering obscuring her face, causing the viewer to concentrate even more on her compellingly incisive, commanding, vaguely malevolent voice. I almost thought she would be deformed or scarred, but when her face is revealed she is neither. Nolan was an amazing chameleon of an actress. She seemed to look and sound different in everything in which she ever appeared. But she can't make it as interesting an episode as it needs to be.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Contrived convoluted mess
deedrala12 September 2020
Not worthy of Hitch's reputation. The same guy who did masterpieces such as Psycho, Marnie, The Birds, The Man Who Knew Too Much et al, allows his name to be attached to this??

Most of his TV series episodes were at least fair to good, and a few even great, but this is one of the absolute worst (along with "Misadventure" which is one of the most atrocious things I've ever seen in my life).

Reading these reviews for this one makes it so apparent how much the imdb message boards are needed, missed, and should be resurrected. They're necessary, especially, with shows like this where help is needed from other viewers to attempt to put the puzzle pieces together to hopefully form a whole, although in this case that would be impossible due to the huge plot holes and continuity gaps.

Rated 3 only because of Nolan's acting - otherwise would be 2.

3 out of 10 / Grade D
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Review of Triumph
easterbrenda27 October 2021
I gotta tell you that I watch this episode nightly!!

I love the intrigue and undertow of desire and emotions that the players evoke. I LOVE this episode and give it all stars!!

I am addicted to watching it every night!

Brenda Easter.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Alfred Hitchcock at his worst
lavendertraveler5 July 2020
Hitchcock's worst production, television or film. A superb actor like Ed Begley delivers the worst performance of his career. I thought that the leading lady, Jeanette Nolan was actually Estelle Getty! I think a lot of Golden Girls fans would make the same mistake. The title makes no sense, Hitchcock's presentation of the episode while not without some humor, was his lamest ever. If this was the pilot episode the series would never have been picked up by the network.
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
ONE BIG HAPPY FAMILY IN THE TROPICS
tcchelsey11 July 2023
Alfred Hitchcock's version of a soap opera to be sure. I totally agree with the last reviewer that this is one of the best acted episodes in the hour long series, hats off to veteran Ed Begley and versatile Jeanette Nolan. Jeanette was a staple in tv westerns for years, usually as a widow or a victim of circumstances, however she could play an even wider range of roles to perfection, and was terrific with wigs and makeup. Begley was your all purpose grizzled good guy/bad guy, an actor's actor who chewed up the scenery. At the time of this episode he appeared in THE UNSINKABLE MOLLY BROWN, in which he also sang and danced.

Here, the dynamic duo play husband and wife missionaries who have much work to do in India. But their private life is more interesting as Begley seems to be attracted to a much young woman --and jealousy naturally rears its ugly head. Truly, Begley and Nolan compliment each other in this excellent drama, and just watching them play off each other is a treat.

Not to be missed, and the supporting cast is also quite good. SEASON 3 EPISODE 9 CBS dvd box set.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Too many disparate story elements to make this one work
planktonrules9 June 2021
Often, I have noticed that many of the one hour episodes of Alfred Hitchcock's show simply didn't have enough story to justify the 60 minute time slot. As a result, a few of the episodes really drag. "Triumph", however, is quite the opposite...an episode which might have worked as a 90 or even 120 minute program but didn't work at 60 minutes because so much of the story seemed missing. As a result, some of the story just didn't make sense...as if important parts were edited out of the story.

The Fitzgibbons (Ed Begley and Jeanette Nolan) are medical missionaries to some far off country (it seems like India but they never mentioned the place by name)....much like the famous Dr. Albert Schweitzer. However, unlike Schweitzer, Mr. Fitzgibbons is an incompetent doctor and his wife often works to hide this. This part of the story is completely unnecessary and really confuses the story.

The Spragues are missionaries who have come to visit the Fitzgibbons family. However, Mrs. Fitzgibbons is an angry, strange woman who thinks the Spragues are there to 'steal' their mission for themselves. This is confusing, since Mrs. Fitzgibbons is very possessive of the mission...yet she seems to hate her husband and even the work they do.

Where does all this go? Well, to very strange places indeed. I'd like to say it made a lot of sense...but it didn't. What was really confusing was Begley's actions late in the show...as well as Mrs. Sprague's. Overall, a very confusing episode that left me feeling a bit unsatisfied because the story simply didn't work and seemed to need a big re-write.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Maggie Pierce is Drop-Dead Gorgeous
mpcurtis-7283010 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Had to watch this episode again, just to see Maggie Pierce as Lucy. She plays an optimistic missionary seconded to an older, bitter one. I saw this episode years ago, and thought I missed something in the confusing ending, but I didn't. It is still confusing, like someone didn't think it through. Lucy admits her husband is flawless, but shows a strange attraction for a browbeaten man twice her age, a missionary who is oddly flirtatious. Her clueless, altruistic husband returns to find his wife dead and immediately wants to kill the perpetrator. (To hell with the Indian legal system!) Sadly, he mistakenly kills his own wife. Watching it again didn't help sort this mess out.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Strange, and not in a good way
practicepiano30 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The visual aspect and the atmosphere of this episode are mesmerizing.

But the writing sounded like an entry in the International Imitation Hemingway contest, in which entrants are asked to write "a really good page of really bad Hemingway."

Among the problems with the short, cryptic sentences, and the sense that everyone's statements are fraught with meaning when they're not, is that Lucy's interest in Brother Thomas is never really accounted for.

I'm not even that bothered by the age difference - there's just no chemistry between them, no common ground, no real reason for her to make the deal she does to help him out. The scenes of them working together, and the conversation in the boat, just fall flat.

I actually think the young missionary does see that it is Jeanette Nolan's character in the coffin. He doesn't look grief-stricken or horrified when he first looks in the coffin, like a man who is looking at his beloved wife, so mangled that he can't tell who it is.

He looks puzzled, at first. As it dawns on him what has happened, then he looks horrified and covers his face, then goes into a rage. From there until the end, he only makes reference to going after "them" - he never says a name.

When he turns Lucy over in the water and we see that it's her, he says her name with a disappointed expression (and I think it was to make sure that we notice it was her, in that dark scene) - he's not shocked or horrified that it's her.

We in the audience don't know it's Lucy until the end, nor does Ramna. But I think John knows he is going after his wife and Brother Thomas, to kill them both.

With better writing, that could have been a great twist ending.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Whoa! You Got Me
Hitchcoc25 May 2023
I don't know where to begin. To start with, Jeanette Nolan is a vicious beast. She has no kindness in her. I guess, discussion makes her out to be quite a good doctor, but she has no compassion for anyone and reputation is everyone. Ed Begley is her husband. They are missionaries in a jungle in India. When a young couple show up to help them, she sees the young woman as the devil. But what happens next is so obtuse as to ruin anything. If the older lady went in with the scalpel....? What was in the grave? Couldn't Begley have yelled out that it's not his wife? And what the hell is going on in that place. How could the two of them stand to be around each other. She offers him nothing but criticism. Not well written and only put together for shock value.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dramatic study of people under pressure
lor_11 July 2023
An interesting study of human nature in a savage land, where Begley presents the survival of the fittest while visiting missionary egghead married to sexy Lucy is more of an idealist, unable to accept that the natives or his hosts could be anything but good-hearted.

Begleyis a doctor and Lucy helps him in operations on the ailing native patients. Jeanette Nolan is terrific as Nolan's strong-willed and jealous wife. Dramatic secrets are kept hidden but inevitably will come out. Fitting the theme of missionaries, the dialogue is quie flowery and philosophical, but easy to take in context.

It adds up to a suspenseful, dramatic tale of people under pressure (in this case fighting a cholera outbreak in the area, quite well acted.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed