Der Wald vor lauter Bäumen (2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Painful
ReganRebecca9 January 2017
I've seen all of Maren Ade's film as of this writing in 2016 and I don't think she's made a bad, or even middling one yet. The Forest for the Trees is her absolutely astonishing debut and immediately showcases her style and strengths.

First of all this isn't a "beautiful" film. Made as a student thesis you can see it was filmed on the cheap on video so the images will never really bowl you over (with a few exceptions). Where Ade's strength lies is in uncovering the hellish situations in reality. She first introduces us to Melanie Pröschle, a sweet, but goofy school teacher who is moving to a new (small) city to teach grade school students. Feeling alone in her apartment building she quickly spies her neighbour Tina Schaffner, and sets about trying to befriend her, which goes in awkward fits and starts as Melanie is socially awkward and doesn't seem to understand boundaries and is constantly confused as to whether her new friend really likes her or not. At first, the tensions between Melanie and Tina seem like the normal awkward pains that happen when adults struggle to make new friendships, but as the movie wears on, and Melanie's professional life flies further out of control, she places greater and greater importance on Tina and her friendship leading to increasingly disturbing encounters between them.

It is an incredibly painful movie to watch because I'm sure everyone has experienced each side of the coin of being a Melanie or a Tina and this movie presents the worst of both worlds. It also features one of the best endings I've ever seen in a movie, and the final shot will stick in my mind for a long time.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well made and disturbing film
Craftsman18001 March 2007
I thought this film was very well made given what was probably a very small budget. The acting was very fine, and the story was painfully realistic in many ways. I got it from the local library because it was about a young teacher. My wife teaches so I thought she might like it. Fortunately I watched it on my own first, and decided that she would probably find it very disturbing because of the realities depicted, but frustrating because of the inability of the young teacher to do what was necessary to help herself.

I found myself very moved by the young teacher, and had the feeling that I'd like to help her through her difficulties...difficulties revealed to the viewer, but ones she was unwilling to admit or express to those who might have helped her in the film.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
excellent film
ffym10 April 2015
Excellent film. Not for everybody for sure, but I found this film one of the best I have seen in years. The director has lots of courage to take such an enormous risk. The film leaves many questions open and is not easy to forget. The acting is absolutely superb, so natural and the film avoids simplicity. Highly recommend for people who hate sugar coating. This is film is truly tough, psychologically tough. The main actress is just amazing,but all supporting actors are good as well. The true subject of the film, I think, is actually survival and friendship. Female friendship rarely gets analyzed so closely and accurately. In general films focus too much on romance and not enough on friendships, which are just as complex and complicated.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
God's Lonely Woman
tostinati20 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Melanie is, simply and unalterably, who she is and has always been. She cannot effectively assert herself. She cannot control other people's impression of her. She cannot draw people close to her, or even get them on her side. This applies to her out-of-view family (we know them only from overhearing her end of unrewarding telephone conversations with them), her students, her staff peers and her neighbors and would-be friends.

Emotional isolation has never felt so completely real on film. Nothing is over-dramatized. No scenery chewing here, Thank God. No dishonest cutaways to a colorful fantasy world inside the main character's head. No Hollywood situations or developments. What happens throughout feels inevitable, and thus real.

I was turned off, in the beginning, by the shot-on-video character of this film, because by default it seemed to mean a dispensing with classic film language, and a less articulate camera. --And there are times I thought a score would have helped. But eventually the deliberately flattened style (call it Bressonian) grew on me. I realized the film wasn't an over-hyped thriller (as the video box more or less lead me to believe) that needed or invited a lot of flash style in the telling. Directness is the best decision the makers could have made in a vehicle built to carry emotional truth.

I recommend this film for people who want something emotionally naked, at times painful to watch, with a psychological preoccupation. If you look at Melanie and see some piece of yourself in real life, this film will probably bring you down. On the other hand, it might also broaden your view of yourself and the world, and impress you again with the fact that no one is weird; people simply are.
24 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Realistic and riveting
ArizWldcat28 January 2005
"The Forest For the Trees" tells the story of Melanie, a young woman who sets off for a job as a teacher in the big city. She is idealistic and thinks (as most new teachers do)that she knows more than the experienced teachers because she has just come from college and she knows "new" techniques, when experience is the ONLY teacher. But I digress...Eva Loebau does a marvelous job portraying Melanie, who can constantly be counted on to say the wrong thing, both in her professional and in her personal life! We watched and cringed as Melanie made faux pas after faux pas, never seeming to learn, and being too proud to ask for help! As to the ending, the director (we saw this at a Sundance screening, and the director came up on stage for Q and A afterward) said that the end was meant to be more symbolic than literal. I didn't really think there would be another credible way to end the story, and thought that the director did an awesome job in this, her first film.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Ouch. A Painful FIlm to Watch.
Eschete7 July 2006
Eva Loebau plays Melanie, an almost socially retarded young teacher who moves to Karlsruhe to begin her career. Her shyness and painfully embarrassing inability to read people makes for one social and career error after another.

She awkwardly befriends a hip and attractive neighbor and then, with her pathetic neediness and constant visits (not to mention her failure to understand subtle interpersonal cues) drives the neighbor to hate her. This, coupled with her legion of problems at work, precipitates Melanie's mental breakdown.

The subject matter, direction, and Loebau's acting makes the film VIBRATE with unease and tension which makes parts of the film almost impossible to watch. Add to this the fact that it was shot on video, giving it a "you are there" realism, and you may need a shot of homemade schnapps to keep from squirming.

A.
47 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very, very painful to watch--don't say I didn't warn you!
planktonrules2 February 2008
Melanie is a new college graduate and is beginning her first teaching assignment. However, she is destined to fail because she is painfully unsure of herself and simply doesn't have it emotionally to be teaching kids. The bottom line is that kids walk all over her, her co-workers generally ignore her, she has almost no friends and she's miserable and alone. Because of this, it made me cringe at times to watch and I kept hoping the character would get into group therapy or find another job. However, she did not and her life continued to spiral out of control--leading to an ending that could be interpreted at least two different ways (neither of which are very positive).

This movie is a wonderful example of a fairly well made film that is very, very painful to watch. While I have a very high tolerance for this sort of thing AND I was interested in the psychological profile of the main character (since I teach psychology), I just can't see the average person sticking with this film or feeling especially satisfied by it. Now this isn't to say it isn't good or worth seeing--but it just takes a particular type of person to view it.

Additionally, I can relate because I am a teacher and I have met several teachers a lot like Melanie. Usually I try to help them out, but in some cases there isn't much you can do other than let them know you care--you can't give a spineless person a backbone or give them enough self-confidence to be able to manage an entire room filled with kids. And, in such cases, the kids usually figure this out quickly and the teacher is "toast", so to speak. Maybe this is also why I felt the movie was so painful--it reminded me of several young teachers (including one who literally had the job kill him due to his poor fit and lack of self-esteem).

Overall, this is well made and perhaps the 6 is a bit harsh, but I had to take off at least a point because it was shot on videotape (making it look cheap) and because of its very, very limited appeal. Still, for lovers of edgy independent and foreign films, it might just be worth a look.
15 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
wow
deebosong24 February 2006
The first few minutes of the film, i couldn't get over the 30fps video hand-held format. I was thinking, "are they crazy? at least shoot 24p..." But soon enough, the story sucked me into Melanie's plight settling into a new environment, struggling with loneliness, desperation, and upholding her facade of "everything is fine," when everyone knows that she is physically and emotionally deteriorating. I thought that the acting was superb. Not once did I feel like the actors were acting, but the video format and the emotions elicited conveyed a painful sense of realism.

This film touches upon a universal struggle of the human condition in such a realistic, frustrating, and true-to-life approach. Her inner tug of war is something that all of us have experienced at one point or another to some degree of severity.

It is truly a touching story.

I haven't felt such pity, frustration, empathy, and genuine identification with the protagonist in a long time.

Find this film and go see it.
37 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
To anyone who do not mind the ambiguous ending
jordondave-280859 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
(2003) The Forest for the Trees/ Der Wald vor lauter Bäumen (In German with English subtitles) PSYCHOLOGICAL DRAMA

Written and directed by Maren Ade starring Eva Löbau as Melanie Proeschle moving into a small town in Germany as a teacher, and attempts to adapt by making a new friend with her neighbor, Tina (Daniela Holtz). At this point viewers hardly know anything about her except that she very slowly becomes the victim of her own rudeness and consideration. As other people including her neighbor and her peers(teachers) attempt to communicate with her, she in return would either become dismissive or ignore that person all together.

I or anyone at one point in time, can relate to her situation one way or another, as it can be a diagnosis of an anti-social personality disorder in a non violent manner, that her only crime is to be inconsiderate. For instance, there is a scene where she agrees to have a meal with another male teacher, and on the very next day, she never even bother to show up. And that in return can automatically push that person away even further.

The reason I am giving the only passable rating is because although it is well made, it's ends on an ambiguous note with zero resolution. Pointing out that there are programs for this, just like there are programs for alcoholism, drugs and trauma. That because the setting takes place in Germany that it may be making a statement, that because it is a country that is no different than anywhere else that it may be perhaps making a cry for help, that there should be an outreach program so that people are able to communicate and to be considerate with one another better. I went into this movie by looking at the poster without any notion about what it's about. And after I finished watching it, I went back to thinking about the poster itself again, beginning to realize that the poster is a fitting one as she has her back on anyone looking at it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent
zetes19 March 2017
Maren Ade's debut. I wasn't expecting too much out of this one, since it doesn't have much of a reputation and I didn't really like Ade's sophomore feature, Everyone Else. I did like her third film, Toni Erdmann, but I kind of figured that was a major step forward for her. To my surprise, I found Forest for the Trees to be her best work so far. Shot on video, this is the story of a lonely, young teacher (Eva Löbau). She isn't too good at her new job, and she's not too good at life outside of school, either. Her 9th grade students walk all over her and the only friendship she can strike up is an awkward one with her neighbor. Löbau's neediness is exacerbated by work stress, and her friend soon grows annoyed with her. As someone who dipped his toes into teaching, I felt like this would have been my experience and, even though I spent a lot of time learning how to do it, I abruptly decided it was not for me. This situation is one of my nightmares, and I felt every painful moment of this film like a needle in my flesh. The film might have seemed perfect to me if not for the sort of cheap, magical realism ending. It's unpleasant, but truthful. Outstanding.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The insurmountable problem of getting rid of trash
vestavia-129 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I watched the movie at a local festival for foreign films and it was obvious that the audience had a hard time to understand the movie or to sympathize with Melanie, the central character of the film. The average American just has a hard time to understand that getting rid of a few bags of trash may become an almost insurmountable problem, that finding new friends among your neighbors or colleagues at work can be so difficult. Of course, our heroine makes one mistake after another, but shouldn't somebody around her see how lonely she is? Ridiculously, she brings home-warming presents to people in her apartment building when she moves in. Doesn't anybody see this as a cry for help? Despite her best intentions, Melanie fails miserably as schoolteacher - why doesn't anyone of her colleagues or the principal rush in to help? The only other young teacher at the school, a guy, senses that she is in trouble, but she can't get herself to open up to him. Melanie tries to win the friendship of the owner of a fashion boutique by buying expensive clothing that she probably can't afford, helps her with cleaning up her apartment, only to get coldly rejected when due to a misunderstanding she dis-invites the boutique owner's boyfriend. Eva Lobau does a fantastic job playing the young schoolteacher who doesn't seem to fit in.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Main character too pathetic to even like
JBoze3137 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This will contain slight spoilers...

This wasn't an awful movie...but I don't think it's a wonderful look at the human condition either.

I'd like to like Melanie- but this woman is beyond all help. It's one thing to be a bit shy or awkward in trying to find new friends, settle into a new job, and that sort of thing. But, when you get to the point where you're nearly stalking a neighbor who clearly doesn't want to be your friend- how can most of us relate to that? How can I care or even get anywhere near sympathizing with a character that I want to reach through the screen and choke? I mean, wow- she's so utterly pathetic it's not even sad...it's beyond the point of it being sad.

In the end- not much happens. We see the most mundane aspects of her day. She folds some clothes and sits in her apartment. She's in class, simply refusing to get any of these brats in line. She's back at her apartment again sitting at a desk. It's just void of a lot of action. Which is fine, if we were getting a realistic character storyline here, but as I've said, I don't think she's all too realistic. I don't know that I've personally met anyone this frustratingly sad and pathetic. And her refusal to tell anyone the truth about how bad things are going. I didn't get it. She's so pathetic, she'll stalk her neighbor, but she suddenly has too much pride to be nice to the one co-worker who is trying to be friends with her? Too full of pride to even be honest with her own mother as to the troubles she's having? And that ending- Call me stupid, but I just didn't get it. She loses it and then sits in the back of her car as it drives itself? Over my head, I guess, but I wasn't sure what the message was.

The cheap quality to the video didn't help this film either. It looked to be shot on a midrange home camera of sorts. Maybe if the main character wasn't so unlikeable for her sheer lack of ANY social skills, the film would have overcome the limitation in video quality, but I don't the story did that. Being socially awkward or downright inept doesn't always turn you off from a character- outright stalking, in my view, does. Being a weirdo makes it hard to sympathize with you, and much harder to feel sorry for you.
5 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A special film, with a great central performance
runamokprods14 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
(Note: Brief plot description ahead that could be seen as a spoiler)

Shot on DV by student filmmakers, this harrowing, heartbreaking story of a socially isolated young schoolteacher's gradual breakdown has an amazing, complex central performance, as well as strong supporting work, and intelligent writing.

A major case of substance triumphing over form, lack of money, and lack of experience. Far more thought provoking and incisive than about 99% of what is being made currently. A film that takes you into the heart of loneliness and isolation. Not easy or fun to watch, but very rewarding
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very effective depiction of a type of non-nuerotypical mind
pmhollow10 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I think that this movie would have gotten the highest rating from me if it wasn't so painful to watch after moving to San Diego from Portland two years ago and only finally feeling that I have a real friend locally a month ago. However, I voted it as high as I did because it really sucks you into the movie. The reason it was so painful is that as a person with undiagnosed Asperger's, but one who recognizes most of the symptoms of social alienation and ineptness within myself, and I see the main character Melanie having a psychological condition of something like that and can see myself falling into her trap, if I let myself.

One viewer suggested she is a sociopath while railing against people like her for being stalkerish. However, beyond empathy - I feel nothing but sympathy for Melanie and her obviously malformed coping mechanisms for extreme isolation which I could see leading one to eventually go down that road in desperation. She and the Science Teacher coworker would have made a good match if only he had not come on so strong (like she does later with her "friend") and she would have seen that he was actually a good person and if she simply looked beyond his baldness and personality flaws. However, that is the problem with being socially inept, it is almost harder to be friends with other socially inept people who are most likely to sympathize with you. The fact she has no one to go to on break, friends or family, indicates she has always been very hard to get along with for any person, including her parents. However, it is disappointing to see no one tries too hard to really get to know or intervene and in the end she likewise never really opens up, escapes and takes the easy way out, a thought I frequently have to fight against when things seem to be too tough, instead of facing her problems in an honest manner.

I would say this is a very good film for someone who wants to understand how a un-neurotypical mind works but it might be a little too much for those un-neurotypicals who struggle like this every day to some degree, unless they can learn something from it without becoming too depressed from watching their own struggles on screen. It really is a perfect storm of malformed psychological intensity causing maximum damage in the protagonist's life.

Regardless, it made me think about things like no other film ever has and viewing it resulted in my first film review so that I could understand the film and my reactions to it better.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Unique
malindameegoda-23 July 2006
This is certainly an interesting film. I discovered this film by accident at my local blockbuster store.At first as another viewer had mentioned found it difficult to get used to the camera format at first. The movie experience was almost like getting sucked into a novel possibly a modern day Camus perhaps.The story also perhaps was focusing on the lack of a social support structure in modern societies. The alienation and loneliness is realized through the character of Melanie in depth. The ending was open to interpretation by the viewer and i am guessing that she is moving on from her teaching position to one which might be more fulfilling. Overall a good job.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The skeleton in her closet Warning: Spoilers
Since the two women live in such close proximity to each other, Tina(Daniela Holtz) really has no choice but to invite the schoolteacher over for her birthday shindig. Tina knows from previous visits to Melanie's place that the comings and goings of her apartment can be easily surveyed from a picture window. Although Tina is leery about Melanie's clinginess and persistent attempts to ingratiate herself in the shop girl's social circle, she doesn't want to hurt the woman's feelings.

In a new town with a new job and new apartment, Melanie Proschle(Eva Loebau) assumes that it'll just be a matter of time before she makes new friends. But in spite of Melanie's best efforts, her students and colleagues reject her, as "Der Wald vor lauter Baumen" offers us a harrowing glimpse of a young woman's mystifying inability to connect with other people. Shot on high-def digital video, the camera is unforgiving in catching every setback that registers on Melanie's face with unerring clarity. Her innovative teaching methods, which she trumpeted at a small faculty luncheon with naive impudence, fails to reach the hearts and minds of both her fifth and nine grade students, who challenge the inexperienced teacher's authority every chance they get. The jagged film ably captures the insanity of trying to teach non-compliant children through the beleaguered teacher's reaction shots to the schoolhouse cacophony. Melanie looks as if she's afraid that the unruly students will eat her alive. Not only do the students hate the young educator, but the teachers as well, with the exception of Thorsten(Jan Neumann), who preys on her needs for a confidant's shoulder that she can depend on for a good cry, or lean. Watching this balding science teacher in action is a study of how the workplace is like a singles bar without the alcohol and smoking. Out of desperation, Melanie eventually goes on a lunch date with Thorsten, in spite of the fact that she normally takes her breaks in a storage closet to avoid him during school hours.

While her professional life lays in shambles, Melanie counts too heavily on Tina for companionship, who might of been a model before she opened up her own boutique. The schoolteacher first laid eyes on Tina in her flat, bawling her eyes out after an animated conversation on the phone. Later on, when the schoolteacher sees Tina on her cigarette break at work, she doesn't let on that they're neighbors. Melanie is every bit as calculating as her colleague Thorsten in this respect; she knows that the right time to insinuate yourself in somebody's life is when the person is at their most vulnerable. If Tina wasn't distracted by her relationship problems, she'd be more cognizant to Melanie's orchestration of their first meeting, and be leery about her ensuing intrusiveness and sense of entitlement to discuss the boyfriend as if they were longtime intimates. Under normal circumstances, Tina probably wouldn't give Melanie the time of day. They simply don't travel in the same social circles. "Der Wald vor lauter Baumen" is almost unbearable to watch whenever Melanie violates the parameters that Tina set out for their commingling, by glomming onto her jet-set friends at private get-togethers that she crashes uninvited. Tina and Melanie's coupling bears more than a passing resemblance to the model/non-model friendship in "Veronica", the celebrated novel by Mary Gaitskill about a high-fashion model named Allison who befriends the titular character, an older, less glamorous woman, with AIDS. Tina may like Melanie, but she's ashamed of her. She's her dirty little secret.

With great economy and precision, "Der Wald vor lauter Baumen" shows us to what lengths a human being will go to make contact with another human being.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very effective depiction of a sociopath
jm1070113 February 2014
Melanie's problem isn't that she's lonely and lacks social skills, or that other people refuse to reach out and help her; it's that she's a sociopath. Here's the dictionary definition of a sociopath: "A person with an antisocial personality disorder, manifested in aggressive, perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior without empathy or remorse."

Melanie lies constantly; she almost never tells the truth even when there's no good reason not to, as when asked what her plans are for the evening or the holidays.

She aggressively invades other people's lives with no sense of interpersonal boundaries, of other people's right to live their own lives without her. She invades social gatherings to which she has been told she is not invited, and she shuns those to which she HAS been invited. She stalks, spies, listens outside doors and windows, pushes her way into other people's houses.

She never sees anything wrong in her OWN behavior - the problem is always somebody else's failure to give her what she needs. She is entirely consumed by her own needs and completely blind to anyone else's needs. She has no business teaching children. She needs intensive psychiatric treatment.

She does NOT need for other people to be more compassionate toward her. They ARE compassionate, but she either rejects them because she finds them unattractive (Thorsten) or pursues them and violates their privacy so aggressively (Tina) that she kills their compassion.

None of these are signs of a normal but shy person, or of a person who simply hasn't had much practice socializing with other people. These are signs of a person with a serious, deep-rooted and potentially dangerous personality disorder. The fact that even her own mother doesn't want to talk to her shows that her behavior problems did NOT suddenly begin when she moved to Karlsruhe and her new job.

She needs a good shrink, not friends. In her present state, she's incapable of friendship or any other normal personal relationship.

This is a very good movie, because I and nearly every other reviewer - even those who give the movie bad ratings - relate to Melanie as if she is a real person. Like it or not, this movie does what movies are supposed to do: create a world which the viewer experiences as real.
7 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A kinda clumsy early effort, nothing stands out
Horst_In_Translation10 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Der Wald vor lauter Bäumen" or "The Forest for the Trees" is a German movie from 2003, so it will have its 15th anniversary soon. The title refers to a German play on words and I am not entirely sure how the English title gives the meaning too. The writer and director is Maren Ade and she is receiving a great deal of attention right now for "Toni Erdmann", but her work here shows that she also has made a couple semi-famous films earlier in her career. As most works from her, there is always a relatively young (around the age of 30) female character in the center of the story (just like "Alle anderen") and this one is played by Eva Löbau here. Löbau is fairly known here in Germany (at least the face) and she also worked with Quentin Tarantino for example already. For Ade, it was her first work as a director in terms of full feature length films, so it's probably not too surprising that the cast (except lead actress) is relatively unknown and honestly, Löbau is also not really a great star or talent, just physically very fitting for a certain type of characters like this one here maybe too.

She plays a teacher who comes to the city and the movie is basically about her struggles to adapt to the new environment and also cope with all the fairly difficult kids in her new class. Put in some notes from the private life of the character and you basically have exactly what you could expect here. This is what it is. I myself, however, was never really well-entertained while watching. I never had the impression that the character(s) or story about her/them actually warranted a movie. I am not criticizing that nothing spectacular happens and the film went for bleak realism obviously and that's perfectly fine for sure. But if you do, then you also need to make sure to deliver in terms of character development and story-telling and there were far from enough moments when this was true. Apart from that, I also found the acting underwhelming overall. I can say I am glad the film runs for 80 minutes only and that's fine because there's no need for a rookie filmmaker like Ade to go for something overlong, but even at this relatively low run time it dragged on a couple occasions. Thumbs down from me. Not recommended and Ade clearly stepped her game up in the years that followed afterward.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A story without middle part
semiotechlab-658-9544410 September 2010
Although this is a very unique movie, the big main lines can be compared to such great achievements like Szlingerbaum's "Bruxelles-Transit" (1980), Goulding's Nightmare Alley (1947) or even Fassbinder's Despair (1978), and in newer time most of all with Moodysson's "Lilja 4-ever" (2002). All the main characters of this movies - Melanie Proeschle, Stan Carlisle, Hermann Hermann and Lilja - share their inability to "read people" and pay it in the end with their sanity and/or life. Their nightmare alley is a one-way street, they may well still realize it, but, as Kafka wrote in "The country physician": once followed the night-bell - and there will be no return. But there is also a leitmotif that all movies in question share; a specific use of light which of first guessing appears to be contradicting and which can best be compared to that light which attracts animals living in dark forests before their get the bullet of their hunters. As can be best seen in "Bruxelles-Transit", such a "Trip into the light", as Fassbinder called this phenomenon, is always characterized by specific transitions rather than to a sudden raping maelstrom. From Stan Carlisle we learn that even in the case we succeed temporarily to turn around on our way to the Exitus (cf. again a word by Kafka), this feeling of having defeated our fate is highly fragile and cheating, the Fatum will overtake us quickly. From Lilja we know the perhaps the most terrible insight is that being prisoners of such transit corridors we may even have to rush in order not to miss our possibility to go out of this life. As "The Forest for the Trees" (2003) concerns, we recognize that all stories have in common a story-line that starts, comes to a climax, and then very rapidly ends in a Accelerando Furioso, without a middle part. The way how the director conceived the end of Melanie Proeschle, this is, to speak the truth, almost beyond imagination.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Creeper alert!
specialk42828 March 2014
In the beginning of "The Forest for the Trees," I was really rooting for the main character, Melanie. She had uprooted her life after a breakup and started a new job in a new city, and I could relate all too well to her feelings of extreme awkwardness and isolation while she is attempting to meet people and settle in. And, although I was wary at first, I actually liked the gritty and (to me) low budget filming style that makes you feel like you are observing every day life rather than being hyper aware that you are watching a movie.

However, after a while, Melanie's attempts at connection were no longer endearing, but full on creepy, and her lack of backbone got old. The story wasn't really progressing beyond Melanie's repeated cringe-worthy attempts to befriend her bitchy neighbor, and I started to get bored.

I was kind of hoping that the movie would end with her losing it on everyone and going on a killing spree or something, but, unfortunately, the directors decided to go with a much more anticlimactic and "open ended" (read: random and wannabe "artistic") conclusion that just made me feel like I had wasted the past 80-ish minutes of my life.
2 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DO NOT WATCH THIS FILM!
michaelzonta29 November 2019
I kept waiting for some movement. Some aha moment. But, no. In the final scene our protagonist takes a back seat to her life. And we've wasted 81 minutes of our life.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed