Chunky Monkey (2001) Poster

(2001)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"Anything beats crucifiction"
Ali_John_Catterall4 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Threatened with five law suits, the no-budget Chunky Monkey emerged blinking into the light after four years in litigation hell, boasting the broken but undefeated tagline: "The film corporate giants tried to stop you from seeing." Long story, but the collective might of Unilever (Ben & Jerry's buyers), EMI and the real Julie Andrews, among others, almost finished it off.

Initially, viewers may experience an odd sense of deja vu: this one's been optimistically (if tiresomely) described as "Abigail's Party on acid" because, like Mike Leigh's 1977 film, it is an ensemble piece, limited to a single room, and populated with a bizarre set of freaks and bores. The presence of Alison Steadman, as a nosy neighbour with a menopausal crush on a lounge singer (Mangan), makes the comparison more explicit. The film is also written and directed by a former Leigh alumni, the actor-director Greg Cruttwell, who played the evil yuppie Jeremy in 1993's Naked. But the resemblance ends there.

Unlike Abigail's Party, this is pretty much an all-out farce, lacking the sharp commentary that made Leigh's drama so successful, even sympathetic. "I wanted to write something that amused me," says first-time director Cruttwell. While the cast appears to share his sense of humour, Chunky Monkey can be very self-indulgent - as if there's some private joke from which the viewer is deliberately excluded.

Like the maligned Sex Lives Of The Potato Men, this one's probably best viewed under the influence. However, when it works, it's quite brilliant; at the very least, it ought to serve as a reminder that British comedy doesn't begin and end with Working Title.

A pre-'Shameless' Threlfall is in his element as deranged antihero Donald, ruminating on dairy-based sex acts with all the disinterested curiosity of the true psychopath, or sinking unhappily into himself via his shoulders, like some curious Victorian parlour trick.

As the Second Coming (the afro-sporting Trevor), McFarlane also provides the single most memorable moment, demonstrating his messianic credentials by walking on Donald's bathwater. So gob-smackingly beautiful and strange, it belongs to another film entirely.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Intriguing but not as interesting or offensive as it sets out to be
therealgoatee4 January 2004
David Threlfall is suitably menacing as a psychotic loner who, stuck with the murdered body of his local curry house, has nothing to do but prepare for his regular sexual encounter with a tub of Ben And Jerry's Chunky Monkey ice cream and a local am-dram actress with a passing resemblance to Julie Andrews. His evening is ruined when a succession of visitors invite themselves in.

What follows is described by the tagline as containing "moments of inoffensive material". The language is strong, the violence is graphic, the sexual content is unseen but highly dubious. Many people will take exception to the depiction of Jesus Christ as a strapping black man with a huge Afro hairdo, who sits benignly through all the various shenanigans, smiling or laughing quietly to himself. Some people may even be offended by the suggestion that Julie Andrews (in her Sound Of Music novice nun role) is the object of a bizarre sexual fetish.

No matter. The film is not, it turns out, as offensive as it tries to be. In particular, the violence fails to shock because we are expecting it throughout. Of course, we know something that the other characters don't, namely, that Donald is a homicidal maniac.

The film is shot on DV and its limitations are clear; the lighting is patchy and the colour balance is inconsistent.

I really wanted to like this film. Its premise is excellent and it has obviously been assembled with more care than the average British independent film. There are a couple of nice touches and special effects that are slightly unexpected in a film of this genre. However, it is only funny in patches rather than humorous throughout and it is difficult to see where much of the budget has been spent. It is also claustrophobic, most of the action situated in only one room. If it had been a play, the critics would have raved; as a film, Chunky Monkey looks set to be overlooked.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boringly tiresome
tao90226 July 2015
I was tempted to walk out after half an hour when it was clear that this film was rubbish but stayed to see if it could get worse - it did.

Donald is a loser living an isolated life in his apartment. He has killed the manager of his local Indian restaurant, waits for a visit from a prostitute and has his apartment invaded by skinhead evangelists, someone claiming to be Jesus, and other characters who also add nothing to a film that already has nothing.

The film appears to be trying to be wacky, outrageous and shocking. However, it is nothing more than tiresome. It is irreverent without being iconoclastic, rude without being scandalous and insulting without being challenging. I'm tempted to say the film was trying too hard but I conclude that it didn't try at all.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed