The Rats (TV Movie 2002) Poster

(2002 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
35 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Unpleasant Theme, but Surprisingly Entertaining
claudio_carvalho14 October 2007
In Manhattan, when a client is bitten by a rat in the dressing room of the Garsons Department Store and contracts Weil's disease, the manager Susan Costello (Mädchen Amick) is assigned to hire and give all the necessary support to the best exterminator in New York, Jack Carver (Vincent Spano). The efficient Jack and his assistant Ty (Shawn Michael Howard) find a colony of mutant rats and try to convince the health department administrator and former partner of Jack, Ray Jarrett (David Wolos-Fonteno), how serious the infestation is. But the politician Ray is interested in covering the problem to protect economical interests of powerful groups.

The theme of "The Rats" is absolutely unpleasant, but the way the story is approached in this movie is surprisingly entertaining. The chemistry between Mädchen Amick and Vincent Spano contributes to make this film work. I do not know if there is any veracity in the scary statistic of nine rats per dweller in New York, but if it is true, the reality is scarier than this film. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Ratos em Nova Iorque" ("Rats in New York")
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A crawling nightmare.
michaelRokeefe10 January 2004
Not for the weak hearted. Legions of vermin infest a Manhattan department store and causes concern for the city as they escape their underground world. Some very good computer generated effects: watching rats fill up an empty swimming pool will make you squirm. An above average made-for-TV movie and worth watching...if you can stand watching violent rats in rage. The cast includes: Madchen Amick, Vincent Spano, Shawn Michael Howard and Daveigh Chase. Creepy.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Remarkably better than the usual made-for-TV junk
Coventry14 November 2004
It's amazing what you can achieve if you dispose over a bit of professionalism. Even the most routine straight-to-cable production can be worth watching if the acting and directing is a little decent. It was the Fox Network that hired John Lafia (Man's Best Friend) to do the directing and the still yummy Mädchen Amick for the female lead. Vincent Spano (Alive) and Daveigh Chase (The Ring) complete the above average cast. The premise of a giant rat-plague threatening a big city isn't exactly new, but still this film succeeds in bringing a bit of tension and entertainment. Mostly thanks to the excellent underground shooting locations (basements, sewers, subways…) 'the Rats' looks icky and a bit unsettling. The rats naturally are slightly mutated by lab-tests and therefore a lot more aggressive and more difficult to annihilate. The grotesque finale in which a swimming pool is used as a rat-fountain is very over-the-top, yet brightly and well elaborated. Mädchen Amick is a seriously underrated actress and I hope she'll receive some new, bigger acting offers real soon. Vincent Spano is pretty good as well and he clearly enjoys sharing rat-trivia with the viewer. I don't know if all what he said is true (for every inhabitant in NY there are 9 rats?? You can get Weil's disease from a rat-bite??) but it was interesting nevertheless. Recommended!
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Surprisingly good for a TV movie
p1phillips20 June 2002
Where I live, this film is available under the title "The Rats" and is very obviously a TV movie - no listing of production companies during the opening credits as well as fade-outs every fifteen minutes or so. Nonetheless, this is a very efficient nature-run-amok horror film, with much stronger gore than I was expecting. Madchen Amick plays Susan Costello, a department store manager who comes to discover that rats are all over the place. She calls in a discreet exterminator (Vincent Spano) to take care of the problem, only to learn that the rats are practically taking over the town, and have voracious appetites to boot. The TV production values prevent anything truly disturbing from happening, but the filmmakers seem to know what they're doing and have some fun with the premise. All in all, a good rent - unless it hits your TV screens first.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This is not a very good movie
PeterRoeder25 November 2009
While I was watching this I swore I would see a doctor if it was rated more than 3 on IMDb, and indeed it was rated 5.1! At least only around 900 people had rated it but anyway. I must say this movie is really bad even for a horror film. I chose it because it looked funny, and I thought that there would be some fun with all the cute rats. But as usual as in these movies it is all about different stuff than rats. There are lots of scenes that seem to have nothing to do with the plot but are just there for some weird reason. Anyway, the scenes with the rats are not bad, especially because not all of it is CGI, so the effects are actually quite good and credible.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This rat is just a little too clean
adamscastlevania222 May 2015
(28%) An honestly not all that bad TV killer rat horror flick that has nothing to really offer but a mildly entertaining, all be it forgettable sit. The cast of unknowns do a decent job and unlike something like Sharknado this doesn't feel the need to add lots of pointless cameos from stars at the lower end of their career. How scary you find this film depends upon your own opinion of how you happen to find rats, but there's not really anything here to get under one's skin as it's all a bit clean and safe. Overall this never drops down too low in the quality department to overly feel like a waste of time, but this still doesn't really need to be seen by anyone bar those slightly drunk during the wee hours of the night.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poor Casting
saint_brett26 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Oh, not more of this! Rats again?

They don't make for good movie villains.

It stars Madchen Amick. Wasn't she in King's 'Sleepwalkers?'

So, Romy or Michelle is casing Macy's over, and judging by her demeanor, she's going to steal the first item that's unmanned. This must be an old movie when honesty and trust were common traits, as today it's all under lock and key.

O la la, take it off, lady. Miss Perfection is here in the change room, stripping down and about to reveal the goods. Just as she's about to reveal all, some swift editing denies the viewer their just desserts. That's not fair. What a tease. I was willing to credit this movie with some bonus points for that scene alone, but now it's angered me.

"You live in the city; you're gonna have rats." It's nice to know Macy's has an infestation problem. I bet they don't have any at Harrods.

It looks like the first victim to fall will be Ricardo Lopez. He's the janitor of the lead actress's building.

Another fine beauty models a blue bikini by an indoor poolside. There are three good-looking ladies in this movie, and I thought they were all the same person. But this bikini instructor is the main actress's babysitter and housekeeper. I think. I need clarification on that.

Jack Carver is employed to eradicate Macy's rat problem, and if he's an exterminator, then I'm Hawaii's president.

Is that Marisa Tomei?

The model exterminator, with a PhD in psychics, brings an accomplice along, and they use luminol to highlight all the rats atrocities at Macy's, and there's crime scene evidence strewn everywhere.

The rats make their presence felt at a local swimming pool, and we see "The Body" run over a blocker who's only 8 years old. It reminds me of Costanza bowling over all the kids in front of Eric the clown.

Hmm, how convenient that the model exterminator, with a PhD in arithmetic, is the love interest for Marisa Tomei.

What is it with catastrophic, disaster action movies, and the time to find love among all the chaos?

Here's a guy on peanuts per hour; she lives in upstate New York, and they're compatible after only a day? Who's buying for a second that this Broadway pretty boy works with pesticides? The casting for this is all wrong again.

Um, hello, does anyone else find it strange that he's called in to exterminate the infestation at Macy's but tends to no other jobs on the side the entire time? The movie spans over a week. It only takes a quarter of the day for real bug sprayers to do their jobs, not over a span of days.

This is slowly sinking into a pit of misery.

As if a floor manager at Macy's would join the two exterminators on an underground tour to inspect vermin in a dangerous environment.

Frigging Jason's down here somewhere.

"I don't like this, Jack." Of course you don't, sweetie; you're not even supposed to be down here in the first place, as it breaks work regulations and protocol for the exterminator boys. You're a liability.

Wow, look at the floor manager of Macy's developing the hots for a contracted exterminator. Do you know how absurd that sounds?

I'm against animal cruelty, but hooray for Marisa Tomei driving over that rat and splattering it like the road kill it deserves to be. I have no love for vermin. And I despise people dressed in tight denim and sporting a rodent on their shoulder.

Is that Natalie Portman?

She quits her job as floor manager of Macy's to go pursue a career in an extermination squad while playing detective to shake down a laboratory that created these crossbred rodents. Can you hear yourself, movie?

No sooner does she join Team Extermina, are they breaking and entering a private residence and committing felonies? Out the door goes the last of her decadence, just to dwell in a disease-ridden crack house, searching for answers to the hordes of rat armies. Talk about a fall from grace overnight. "Hi mom." "Hello dear." "I'm now an exterminator working for two college dropouts." "You're what?"

Team Extermina comes full circle when the model, with a PhD in science, worms his way to Natalie Portman's apartment, and in about five minutes, no doubt they'll be sleeping together. He wins over her daughter by capturing one rodent, and soon he'll be her stepfather in world-record time.

This chick left her million-dollar-a-year job to become totally dependent on the exterminator's salary.

He didn't even bait the traps and plug the holes as promised at the start of the movie. They're doing nothing but over-analyzing scenarios throughout the whole movie instead of implementing any action.

I wish Jason would appear just to throw a spanner into the mix.

It turns out the rats were attracted to a certain brand of Mennen cologne, which is preposterous, and Team Extermina lured the bulk of the rodents to a swimming pool with skin bracers rigged to an electrical component that fries them to a golden crispy brown at the end. Serve with sour cream.

I can't let it slide how Portman fell into the pit of rodents for 5 minutes, and not one rat bit her the whole time. She must have been wearing the wrong-numbered Chanel or had rodent repellent on. They had no problem biting other saps.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Give it a chance
JHC329 October 2002
I stumbled across "The Rats" in a local video store. Since I was in

the mood for low budget B horror, I took a chance and rented it.

What a wonderful surprise.

Superficially, the film's premise seems to be one of the many

overdone, tired plots we've seen so often. Instead, the viewer is

treated to a well made, well acted film. It is suspenseful and

benefits from good special effects for the rats (animatronics and

CGI, apparently).

The basic storyline concerns a colony of bioengineered rats that

were inadvertently allowed to escape from a defunct lab in New

York City. Years pass and the rats become a massive horde of

aggressive, disease-spreading vermin. After the Health

Department decides to ignore the problem, it is left to an

exterminator (Spano) and a department store operations manager

(Amick) to investigate the problem and deal with it.

Fans of B movie horror should definitely give this a chance. It is far

better than the title or basic premise would suggest.
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lameish ratty B-movie
Leofwine_draca26 March 2015
THE RATS is yet another monster flick detailing a rodent menace, following on from the likes of DEADLY EYES, the two WILLARDs, and plenty more movies made over the years. This has little to recommend it other than an interesting premise that at least has a halfway decent reason for the rat invasion which is taking place in an unfortunate borough of New York City.

What I was pleased about is that THE RATS avoids dodgy CGI for the most part, although it is here in places (that ridiculous climax has to be seen to be believed, for example). There are plenty of genuinely furry critters in sight, although as ever these hold no fear for me; I find them pretty cute in fact.

The weakest part of the production lies in the characterisation, which is non existent and presents stereotypes instead of real people throughout. There's the good-looking hero, the good-looking woman caught up at the centre of the chaos, her imperilled daughter, the boss who refuses to believe there's a problem, the incredulous police force. What follows is entirely predictable, with a little gore here and there to try to keep viewers interested. It's not very good, let's leave it at that.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Exterminator
sol121815 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** Skin crawling horror flick involving genetically altered mutant rats who, when excited, rampage through the subways and sewers of New York City devouring any and everything that happens to get in their way.

These "cute" and "cuddly" little critters come on the scene in of all places the upscale and swanky Garsons Department Store where the rich and famous do their shopping. The mystery of way these hoards of infected, with Weils Disease, and flesh eating rodents choose Garsons is later found out by the store's manager's Susan Costello, Madchen Amick, 12 year-old daughter Amy, Daveigh Chase, That happens late in the movie. Which by that time the rats were coming out of their underground hideouts-by the millions-to do battle with the entire population of NYC!

It's up to ace exterminator Jack Carver, Vincent Spano, and his rat a**-kicking sidekick Ty, Shawn Michael Howard,to not only find where these rats are hiding but to zap them, with explosives and state of the art rat poison, before they by breeding with the much meeker and less aggressive local city rats create a rat army of over 100 million giant mutant rodents. In no time at all this giant rat army will not only overrun the Big Apple but end up killing, with the deadly Weils Disease, half of the US population; Like they did back in Europe in the 14th century by spreading the Black Plague!

***SPOILERS*** As you would have expected it's the top city leaders like Health Department's head Ray Jarrett, David Wolos Fonteno, who do more to have the mutant and killer rats getting out of control then anybody else. Jarrett doesn't want the public to be alarmed by the thought that millions upon millions of killer rats are secretly breeding right under their feet in the NY Subway System and are about to explode and overrun the city. This insane reason by Jarrett gives the rats every opportunity, in not being hunted down and killed by Carver & Ty, to do exactly what the not too on the ball Jarrett is in fact trying to prevent them from doing!

Ferocious and gut-spilling final with the rats spilling into the city's underground subway system and terrorizing the unsuspecting strap-hangers to the point where more people end up dying from strokes and heart attacks then from the rats themselves! Carver realizing what's turning the rats on, something that's sold at Garsons Department Store, lays a trap for them at the midtown Recreation Center's massive Olympic size swimming pool. The far too shocking, for those of us in the audience with weak stomachs, and mind blowing ending has to be seen to be believed! With the rats, now numbering ten times more then the entire NYC population, spilling into the recreation's swimming pool with the added attraction of Susan, who accidentally sipped into the pool, being swarmed all over by them! This makes Carver plan in blasting the rats to kingdom come, with Susan's life in danger of being blasted along with them, that much more difficult!

P.S The made for TV movie "The Rats" was to be broadcast on the evening of Tuesday September 11, 2001 on FOX TV Network. By then people had a lot more on their minds then rats and rodents which was why the film was rescheduled for a later, and less stressful, date.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A fun old-new horror film? Rats!
shnizzedy25 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
For a horror/thriller movie called "The Rats", this one is almost as good as any could be. The plot is predictable and the dialog cheesy, which makes this 2002 film feel like it was written in the 1940s. Mädchen Amick's acting style reminds me of Jennifer Lopez'. The opening sequence, which alternates between a woman trying on clothes in a department store and a rat crawling through the walls, is not how the entire movie plays. In fact, the opening scene was the hardest part of the movie for me to sit through. Beyond the first rat-human encounter, the film is Indiana Jones-style fun without Spielberg quality. The Rats is by no means a perfect or thoughtful film, but the film is remarkably fun.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Superbly creepy horror flick!
PoochJD26 December 2002
This film has only just come out to rent (December 2002), here in the UK, and I am so glad I rented it. Normally, most certificate 12 horror films are usually awful, but this may well be the only exception to the rule.

Despite only having two well-known stars, in Vincent Spano and Madchen Amick, the film crafts an amazingly gripping and shocking atmosphere - something that is rare for TV movies - that will scare the pants off of you.

The best part is the sheer intensity of the rats, which are surprisingly made up of CGI and animatronic effects. Although looking at the film, they actually appear incredibly realistic, to the point that you really feel for the two leads when they are under attack. The rats are really malevolent, and will freak you out in a big way, especially when they bare their teeth, and start to attack the humans.

What is a superbly creepy horror flick, was only let down by the fact that it wasn't filmed in widescreen, but that is a very minor problem. I would highly recommend this film, as it delivers some excellent scares, and a good standard of acting, not normally found in TV films. The standout moments, are the ending, and the rat attack in the swimming pool, near the start of the film.

Thoroughly nasty, with some neat gore effects, and will do for rats, what "Jaws" did for sharks, and "Arachnophobia" did for spiders! Brilliant! Definitely one of the best horror films in a while! A sleeper hit worth the rental fee!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Obviously Studio Picture Quality
PumpkinKing910 June 2003
I'm normally very cautious about renting films whose quality is dubious, especially if they are direct to videos. But I've been doing research lately and, based on positive imdb reviews, decided to check out The Rats (not to be confused with Killer Rats). I must say that this is a movie done with great taste and quality. The story was well thought out and the dialogue wasn't at all cheesy. It also doesn't hurt to have a beautiful leading actress. Good job to FOX for making a great DVD! Recommended is you want a fun but not over the top creature fx.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mutant rat rampage in New York
one9eighty5 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Is this a straight to TV film by any chance? It certainly felt like it from the get go although this wasn't as tacky and cheap as other films I've seen in the last five years so credit where credit is due, it's not as bad as it easily could have been. Let's face it, there have been lots of films made already which deal with rats as a theme so this wasn't anything startlingly new but it was handled in a refreshing way.

Fuelled by narrative rather than blockbuster action this film trundles along nicely and doesn't do anything too wrong. It's got suspense and tension and the special effects and minor use of CGI work well.

A New York department store noticed it had a minor pest problem, they called in the professionals to deal with it who uncover that the minor problem is in fact a lot worse than thought. Meanwhile other reports circulate pointing towards the problem being less localised than just the store. The exterminator becomes detective and finds out that the rats are a rouge swarm which have been manipulated and mutated by science. Left abandoned the rats do the natural thing and try and support themselves to escape the science lab and live. In doing so they become a menace to the local populace as they nibble, bite and spread disease. Can the exterminator crack the problem and save the city before the problem gets out of hand?

5 out 10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It's not The Godfather but it was fun.
singtao19 September 2002
I had the pleasure to work on this film as the Second Unit Director (I shot all the rat stuff), but never got a chance to see the final product until tonight ,Sept 19 /02. It was fun. It's not The Godfather but i found it well edited and the folks at Core Digital did an excellent job with the water sequence and the rat multiplying. Carls death was great. It just reminded me that the stunt co-ordinator of the film Anton (Ty) Tyakodi was killed in a helicopter accident a couple weeks after we finished shooting. I'll miss him. John, learn how to move the camera and get off the long lenses once in a while. Too bad it was up against Survivor Thailand, no one probably saw it. Thanks to Eric and Robert for the chance to work on it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It's no Indiana Jones
tw1zzlers28 March 2007
So according to this movie, rats outnumber humans in NYC nine to one. I accidentally got caught up in this predictable piece of cheese while flipping channels, error. Avoid this if you can. I don't think it's a good sign for a movie when you find yourself pulling for the rats - hoping they eat all the actors ...and the cameraman. Though I will hand it to them, they made me not want to ride a subway ever again. And while I'm sure a 3am viewing of this film would be more creepy-crawly, even the 2pm version was enough to make y'squirm. But why? Why do we need this movie. I guess there's an answer: 30 years ago, they brought in cats to handle the rat problem in my neighborhood (true story), and after this film, I feel I owe the then-mayor a thank-you note. Maybe I'll track him down.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Real Scary Movie
johnmbale12 March 2005
Stylish Susan Costello (Madchen Amick) is PR at Garvers Department Store in New York City. An unsuspecting customer is bitten by a rat in one of the dressing rooms and develops a serious disease. More sighting of rats at a nearby swimming center, and at Susan's apartment, suggest a plague of the rodents is brewing, and they appear to be overly aggressive too. Jack Carver (Vincent Spano) a suave professional rat exterminator and Susan together try to stem the plague of killer rodents, which extends to the Underground Railway, and finally ends at the swimming pool in a very suspenseful sequence, while the Health Department hope the whole thing will go away, and try to sweep it under the carpet. This is much better than the average thriller TV film thanks to some good special effects, and the general fear most folks have of Rats, especially feral ones in mass. In fact giant spiders ("The Haunting of Toby Jug" "Funnelweb"), rats, and snakes ("Lair of the White Worm" "Anaconda") all figure largely in horror literature. James Herbert wrote about London being invaded by rats in one of his first novels, (The Rats), but in this case the city is New York, and the rats have been mutated into something seriously aggressive, especially in huge numbers. Some possibly true and disturbing facts about the rodents in the city come to light in the script, which is reasonably sane for this type of movie. There are some well designed moments of horror - the janitor ends up in a very nasty situation being eaten alive. The cast have most unpleasant encounters with the little critters, making D. W. Griffith's putting Lillian Gish in a scene with a couple of rats ( in the days of the silent films ) seem like a summer picnic. She (Gish) managed to gain some publicity from the fact she allowed rats to crawl about her at the time. I'm not sure of the almost unknown cast of this feature gained as much notoriety, although perhaps they should considering the number of rats involved. However we are more skeptical today as digital effects can create the most awful situations without the actors being much impaired. Altogether the film will probably increase your phobia for Rats if you have one, and maybe start one if you haven't. Caution - don't watch the movie if you're squeamish.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
No one can escape.... THE RATS!
tom_koopa27 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I wasn't sure what to think about this movie when I found it online and decided to download it. After watching it, I can happily say that it was an entertaining, effective little horror movie.

It's really what the title says. Rats invade Manhattan and start to get aggressive and even kill people. It's a bit cliché at times, but the movie has it's moments.

I liked the acting of most characters, especially the kind rat exterminator. He made me laugh several times.

The Rats is certainly not a bad movie. It's not the BEST horror movie out there using normal creatures as a theme, but they did use real rats for most scenes. So that deserves a thumb up.

I give this movie 7 out of 10 stars.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
much better than the average midday movie
maddymoo27 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
As someone who has kept rats as pets and knows what wonderful companions they can be, I am usually disappointed by the way they are portrayed on the screen. Yes, this is a somewhat silly movie, but on the whole it worked very well and my perpetual ratty craving was well-satisfied with so many closeups of sleek, well-fed rodents.

I was delighted to see Mädchen Amick in this film - recognising her name from 'Twin Peaks' but not immediately being able to remember her character. She looks fantastic and it made me realise just how young she was when she played Shelly Johnson.

I was also delighted with the CGI, particularly for the "fountains of rats" scene at the empty pool. Yes, it was silly, and we did laugh, but all those pretend rats actually looked real, not like static cut-outs pasted over and over, and not like the typical joke-store rubber effigies either. As for the scenes with real rats, they were beautifully done, especially the closeups.

I'm pretty demanding when it comes to CGI and animatronics, particularly for animals. I'm critical of angles, texture and lighting, and many films have been spoiled (imo) by their too-glossy critters which just can't be taken seriously in the context of their roles. I remember being astonished after seeing 'Congo' when it came out - I hadn't been able to pick the fake apes and that's something that I usually do pretty much automatically (having spent some hands-on time with chimpanzees in my childhood and being generally obsessive on the subject). I can pick a person in a monkey suit nine times out of ten, but 'Congo' was the first time I didn't realise I was seeing CGI, and I was hugely impressed.

So, any film that can utilise large numbers of animals and make them realistic... even if you know they have to be CGI... and when those animals are one of the handful of species that I know well enough to tell the difference between the real deal and a mockup... that film gets a big thumbs-up regardless of how silly or painful the rest of it is. In other words, if it weren't for the wonderful proliferation of credible rats in this movie I would have given it a 7, which in my system means "liked it well enough but wasn't anything special". Without Mädchen Amick it might even have been a 6.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Squeak, squeak, squeak
Samiam328 May 2010
When Ratatouille came out, parents flocked to pet stores to buy a rat at their kids' request. The problem was that nobody knew how to take care of them. Well at least society now has a more positive image of the rat, something that this little TV movie probably won't provoke.

I had a couple of pet rats myself, so I know personally about some things which movies never get right about them (and this goes for both sewer and pet rats). Biggest goof of all, Rats do not squeal or shriek every second of every minute of every day. The sounds they make on a daily basis are inaudible to the human ear. They only squeak when in distress, and in this movie, it is us humans who are in distress. The Rats offers purely visceral pleasure. If you are in desperate need of some goosebumps, or want to have a contest with two or three friends to see who gets squeamish first, this is the movie for you.

Personally I cannot say I didn't enjoy it, especially the climax. Directed by John Lafia, who made almost unwatchable sequel to the very watchable and memorable Child's Play, and starring Mädchen Amick, who was cute in Sleepwalkers (also not much of a movie). The Rats is yet another creature feature that owes more than a little to the mastermind of Alfred Hitchcock's the Birds. I also saw a little bit of Jaws at times, especially one sequence involving the invasion of a public pool, (Rats are good swimmers actually, it is not as dumb as it may sound.

That say, the movie is not that smart and definitely not inventive, but it does what it is supposed to do, even if that comes at the cost of giving rats a bad name.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I actually liked the 1982 version better...
SusieSalmonLikeTheFish18 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The Rats is based on a horror novel by James Herbert of the same title. It is a remake of a low-budget 1982 movie called Deadly Eyes as well, both filmed in Toronto but The Rats takes place in Manhattan whereas Deadly Eyes takes place in Toronto (the novel took place in London). This 2002 adaptation follows the story of the book slightly closer than Deadly Eyes did, and the effects were better in The Rats (in Deadly Eyes wiener dogs dressed in rat suits were used to depict giant killer rats).

I know it isn't really fair to compare a remade movie to its original, but this version of The Rats is bad enough on its own. It's kind of entertaining, incredibly cheesy and for the most part sort of enjoyable, but it doesn't deliver on many levels. Its soundtrack is pretty bad as well, as was the acting.

Deadly Eyes had great soundtrack, it had decent acting and it was a hilarious, cheesy thrill-ride, very different from The Rats. Honestly I don't really think that this movie even needed to be remade, but watching The Rats wasn't a total waste of time. If you're a fan of the novel and original movie you may want to avoid it, but if you're into more modern horror, chances are you'll really enjoy this one.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Less of a Nuisance, More of a Delight
jamhorner11 October 2007
I'll be truthful, when I first picked up this movie in the library, I though I would cry myself to sleep because of how horrible it might be, but I digress, it was pretty good. There were some scares; some scenes were you just cringe because its rats but I liked it. It boils down to New York run amok by rats, but these are no ordinary rats, they are, in fact, parasitic disease-spreading rodents that broke out of an abandoned genetics lab.

The movie had some pretty sly humor and the characters were very well played out. The whole concept of rats invading a luxury department store and finding mounds of rat crap all over the place, using a dark light, was the funnies thing I have ever seen in a rodent movie. Some interesting scenes involving massive hordes and tunnels of rats got me pretty uncomfortable, some, like the pool scene, were suggestive considering massive blood loss of kids.

The movie had some pretty snappy comebacks and a humorous relationship between the sophisticated luxury department store owner and the suave discrete exterminator. Their relationship, at points, is hard to look at because of campy level it's on but nonetheless a very good relationship. I liked how the Health Department is trying everything to cover everything up and…..its just a funny, scary movie.

Of course, there is a limit of how much corniness and silliness a movie can have. But despite that factor, this isn't that bad of a movie, the rats are more of a vermin that his movie and I think that any horror fan should at least try this movie. I like it, not loved it, but like it, and I hope other will.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Surprisingly Enjoyable Film
Broken-Tusk3 February 2003
Having read James Herbert's The Rats, Lair and Domain years ago, my mind was screaming with the possibilities of seeing these great novels on the silverscreen! So when i saw this title at my local videostore on DVD, i knew the odds were high of the film being very well be corny.. but i wanted to live out my dream, even though the film never actually states that it is based on Herbert's writings in any way.

I was setup for a let-down, but as i watched and watched, this film was actually above B- Grade! To tell you the truth, it is a really top notch flick that i wish had been based off, or had something to do with Herbert's books!!!

I dont know any of the actors, but their performances were pretty solid, and to tell you the truth, the movie fit the horror bill quite well.

I dont want to spoil anything for you, but i for one am glad that i got to this one before the actual 1982 Herbert novel adaptation entitled simply Rats (aka: 'Night Eyes', 'The Rats' or Deadly Eyes'), which im too frightened to watch after reading shocking reviews. I simply dont want to spoil the books.

If you happen to see the title around someplace and are a fan of Herbert's excellent novels, then go for it, i say! For something that i was expecting very little of, its certainly worth a look.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A much better movie than the reputation gives it
slayrrr6661 November 2004
Warning: Spoilers
'The Rats' is a very entertaining film for the kind of movie that it is.

**SPOILERS**

Deep under the streets of New York, an army of rats is gathering. They appear to be far more vicious and smarter than previous New York rats and have no problem attacking people. Susan, (Madchen Amick) is worried about the sudden appearance of rats in her apartment and at the department store where she works. Her fears are justified, as there are thousands of rats that can overpower even the largest person. The department store suffers one victim from the rats, forcing Susan to bring rat exterminator Jack Carver (Vincent Spano) to find the rats. They learn that the store is being secretly turned into rat HQ. With assistant Ty, (Shawn Michael Howard) the three are undeniably convinced of the rat infestation and that the rats are spreading out into the surrounding neighborhood. A close encounter in the local swimming pool confirms everyone's suspicions. Starting with Susan's apartment, they find more and more rats. Not wanting to close down any part of New York due to several important functions in the city, the three exterminators start a giant campaign to stop the rats from taking over and killing off the entire population.

The Good News: I really thought this was a clever movie in that it introduced the rats as villains even before we see the human characters. This is a really refreshing move, since we don't normally see the villain first in movies. The high levels of suspense in this was unexpected. There were plenty of scenes that were pretty suspenseful. The rats converging on the swimmers in the swimming pool, the discovery of the rats' sleeping place, and the descent into the subway looking for them were all pretty suspenseful and helped the movie look that much better. In the hands of a master suspense director, those scenes would be even better. Also, the viciousness of the rats is without question. They are quite vicious and can also assume an intimidating pose. Once we get to the final half-hour of the film, it kicks into high gear and really lets loose with the suspense and action. The train sequence has to be the best example of this, as giant swarms of rats crawl over every inch of subway train as the passengers scramble to get over the horde of oncoming rats. It is a sight to behold as the thousands of rats are seen to climbing over everything inside. It is a wonder how the rats were trained to do such complex maneuvers and stunts. They looked realistic when they were not CGI creations, and were pretty terrifying. Even the action in the film is exciting. There are a lot more action scenes in the film than I would've expected. Most of it does occur in that last half, but there are a lot of these scenes spread out in the course of the film. The only gore scene in the film is a brief shot of a man who has been overrun by the rats, and most of his body is eaten away down to the bone and various ribs are exposed with meat and flesh are still hanging on to them. Not exactly a new level of gore standards, but here it certainly isn't obtrusive.

The Bad News: The CGI generated rats were very fake looking and could be distinguished from the other, real rats. It was even pretty easy to determine what were real rats and what were the fake rats. I am getting very tired of kinds of those films that always depict the leaders of a community that are more interested in saving their public opinion than in saving lives. It has become a very tired cliché in movies since 'Jaws,' and doesn't need to be in any more films. They only come off as uncaring, evil people who meet their fortunate demise late in the film. There isn't a lot of jumps in the film, so it basically relies on the 'ick' factor many people get from rats. If they don't bother you too much, then it might be a little harder for you to like this, but it still isn't that bad of a film.

The Final Verdict: While not a classic by any means and only slightly better than the other rat film released a year later, this is one reasonably entertaining movie. Seek it out if you like rodent films or to those who seek out obscure films to try and find an unseen favorite.

Rated R: Graphic Violence, Adult Language, vicious man-on-animal attacks, and Brief Nudity
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Classic rat invasion flick, good quality
siderite2 April 2006
I have to agree with all the people here, the movie was good for a TV movie. Cast, directing, effects, all good. The only problem is the script that has all the elements of a rat movie, but nothing extra. It's a very well done cliché.

You've got the damsel in distress, the rat exterminator white knight, the black sidekick, the indifferent/irresponsible city official and, of course, mutant rats. Why can't they be normal rats? Because you need to kill them all at once in the end, this one being the worst part of the formula: build the tension, steady, ready, release!

So, OK, the script was almost believable, there were some interesting twists here and there, like a gushing fountain of rats, a guy with a coat of biting rats, the look of the rat that witnesses the brutal killing of its peer... mainly scenes with rats :) But I think it never aimed above the rating of TV movie, and it never got there.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed