Fly (1970) Poster

(1970)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Fly is another John and Yoko project that tests one's tolerance for their work
tavm24 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
"Well, that wasn't very good, was it?" That's what Dan Aykroyd's Leonard Pith-Garnell would probably say if he were presenting this on "Saturday Night Live" in a segment called "Bad Avant-Garde Film". I mean seeing a fly go on a naked woman's still body for about 25 minutes with Yoko Ono doing several wailing noises and hearing some stringed instruments playing off-key as a score while more flies come on the body can be bloody awful! But I admit I did get some amusement out of some of those Yoko "sounds" which was why I half thought of Aykroyd in his best snooty voice as Pith-Garnell. And I also half-wondered if that woman-played by Virginia Lust-was supposed to be dead. And did Yoko's husband John Lennon provide the music in the second half? Questions, questions. And since I've probably spent more time writing this comment that I probably should have, I'll just say this short Fly is definitely an acquired taste especially for those who LOVE avant-garde films.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
John and Yoko make another movie - Oh no!
jblynch12 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Have you ever wanted to watch a fly crawl around for a half hour? Apparently John and Yoko did, and unfortunately they filmed it. Their mostly static camera follows a fly as it crawls around a naked woman's body. The fly, shot in extreme close-up, scurries around her toes, eyelids, nipples, and yes, even ventures into her netherworld. While there is something interesting about the juxtaposition between the erotic body and the disgusting insect, the film is mostly an exercise in boredom. It doesn't help that high-pitched moaning and Yoko yelps constitute the soundtrack. This is what happens when two people get so much praise they feel that any idea that pops in their head deserves to be brought to the public eye. This film is exceedingly painful to watch, even though it clocks in at 25 minutes.
5 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An avant-garde work of genius
xxforest16 August 2007
In the same vanguard of avant-cinema as Ernie Gehr and Ken Jacobs and Michael Snow, Yoko Ono, along with John Lennon, creates a most irregular surprise in Fly. Sort of a deviant crooked smile, nod and wink to surrealism, Ono's film, though maligned by many (as she herself was when it came to many a Beatles fan), is by far one of the albeit queerest pieces of experimental cinema this side of the Lower East Side. Perfectly attuned, even during Ms. Ono's rather off-pitch fly noises-cum-soundtrack, this film needs to find a place amongst the rest of the underground cinema masterworks such as Snow's Wavelength, Gehr's Serene Velocity and Jacob's Tom, Tom the Piper's Son. Nineteen minutes of pure heteromorphic deeelight.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed