User Reviews

This movie was fantastic and boy was it a powerful look at Dahmer. I liked it much better then the newer movie that came out this year. What ever happened to Carl Crew who plays Dahmer in this film? Not only is he damn good looking but he was a great actor. It's sad he did not have a longer and more exciting career in the business,especially when you consider the many undeserving talentless actors out there going strong. Anyway,the film is very entertaining,Carl Crew is a breath of fresh air to watch and the plot moves along great. See the movie. I only wish the DVD was better quality,but it's better then nothing.

"The Secret Life" starts with the worst possible narrative intro: "The crimes committed by Jeffrey Dahmer are too horrible to make a film about...". Okay, so what are you suggesting? That we shouldn't bother to continue watching as the film won't be accurate or bloody, anyway? And they were right, too! The film isn't the least bit shocking and contains almost no blood or gore at all. Although I think that's mainly due to the low budget production values and not because of Dahmer's crimes being too horrific. Basically, "The Secret Life: Jeffrey Dahmer" is just one sequence repeated over and over again. Young, pitiful and mentally confused Jeffrey picks up victims (always males, as he was a homosexual), kills them and then talks about how it wasn't his intention to hurt them and about how lonely he is. This gets boring really quick and even the admirable performance by unknown actor Carl Crew can't save this movie from being a total dud. Still, this version is much better than the pretentious and hopelessly muddled "Dahmer" that got released in 2002.

This film is the most traumatising and painful horror film I have ever seen in my life. To know that this film is based on a true story and watching Jeffrey Dahmer(Carl Crew) brutally murder his victims is enough to bring a tear to my eye. I admit this was a low budget film with not the best dialogue, however it explained why Jeffrey Dahmer was a Psycotic maniac. As he was so selfishly/inwardly emotional his emotions and selfishness went so far deep into his brain that it resulted into him becoming a murderer. Every person that he lured back to his apartment, he was attracted to and had feelings for, and the reasons why he murdered them wasn't only for the thrill of killing them but because he couldn't cope with the fact of them leaving him. In the scene when he killed his first victim by bashing an object at the back of the guys head from what I noticed wasn't because he wanted to kill him but because he was devastated with the idea of the guy leaving him. It was from thereafter that he got use to the homicidal behaviour and made killing his hobby - for both evil and emotional reasons.

The scene when he was talking while crying on the phone with his mother and telling her how much he loved her and the love he showed to his grandmother and how he didn't want to move out of her house did show that he did have love in his heart. One scene that I found quite spooky and strange was when a priest overheard Jeffrey in a pub inviting a guy back to his apartment and then phoned Jeffrey up in a phone booth within the pub so that the guy would lose patience and change his mind on going home with Jeffrey. When the guy left the pub, the priest then hung up the phone and was was laughing at Jeffrey. I also found that Carl Crew played a remarkable acting performance as the role of Jeffrey Dahmer. His evil and cold blooded facial expressions before he massacred his victims were so real, I was shivering in my seat. His facial expressions reminded me of the way Vincent D'onofrio (Private Pyle/Leonard) in the film 'Full Metal Jacket' looked just before he gunned-down the General in the toilet barracks.

If your an emotional person I wouldn't recommend you to watch this film but if your not, than go ahead and watch it.

Only know about this movie from the Maury Povich show that was re-run on YouTube & had to leave a review on how disgusting solely the attitude that came from the lead actor Carl Crews & David Bowen the director towards the victims' families on that show. It was nauseous how disrespectful they were being to them & their duff low rating movie. Funny thing that the only reason it is even known is from that. Utter trash. From watching the trailer & a few clips of the crap, am glad I didn't put myself through anymore torture. Glad to see that their later careers came to zilch tho, apart from a few more awful cheese horrors.

The life of disturbed man Jeffrey Dahmer (Carl Crew) is chronicled from 1978 to his capture in 1991 chronicling the various murders and encounters with law enforcement.

The Secret Life (aka The Secret Life: Jeffrey Dahmer) is a 1993 direct to video biographical crime drama produced and directed by David Bowen (whose prior credits are mostly associate producer duties on low budget genre flicks) and written by and starring Carl Crew who some know from his sideshow museum/nightclub California Institute of Abnormalarts (now closed as of 2022) and long time viewers of the Cinema Snob will know of him from his work co-starring and writing the film Gross Out. Beginning production in January of 1992 before Dahmer's trial had even finished, the movie was filmed independently and in secret with Crew using newspaper stories and court transcripts as the primary research for the film. The movie was derided by the families of the victims, escaped victims, and critics with a notable climax to the controversy captured in an episode of Maury Povich's tabloid talk show wherein Bowen and Crew defending themselves against accusations from a survivor of Dahmer's spree and the mothers of two of Dahmer's victims. The Povich interview is also where I got most of the information related to the research on this movie (as smaller productions from the 80s and 90s aren't well documented) and while the victims in the movie don't have the real life names of the actual victims, a cursory glance at the timeline of events shows how detailed the murder sections are and how transparently they serve as analogues to real life people. Controversy aside, The Secret Life has largely fallen by the wayside in the years since its release as it has never been re-released passed the initial VHS run, and has largely gone the way of one of those "Ripped from the headlines" TV films like The O. J. Simpson Story that were made quickly, cheaply, and fed off the hot button issue of the time. Upon a look back, The Secret Life is just another hot button movie where competence and purpose were a distant second to quickness and first mover advantage.

Movies based off of real life atrocities are nothing new as the Robert Bloch novel Psycho and the Hitchcock film adaptation of the same name both take influence from Ed Gein "The Butcher of Plainfield" with later films such as Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Silence of the Lambs also using Gein as a basis for their killers Leatherface and Buffalo Bill. Smaller films were especially noted for this approach such as the surprisingly decent Arch Hall Jr. Film The Sadist which was inspired by Charles Starkweather or even something rather silly like 1971's The Zodiac Killer which was actually part of an elaborate plan by director Tom Hanson to make a ridiculous backstory for the unknown serial killer in the hopes he'd arouse the killer's curiosity and be able to lead police to catch him (true story). But with something like Psycho, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Silence of the Lambs, and even The Sadist those weren't direct adaptations of real life events and only took inspiration from them so they could be afforded a degree of leeway in terms of what they were. The Zodiac Killer is another matter, but at least Hanson was trying to bring about something positive with his movie (silly as it may be in hindsight). When it comes to the genre of True Crime, you need to have a point as to "why" you're telling this story. If your point is "it's a big story and we wanted to get to it first" that's not a good reason and that's just being exploitative, to The Secret Life's credit it doesn't linger on the torture scenes of sadism any longer than it needs to and does try to look at the human core of Jeffrey Dahmer, but it's also not very good at it.

Throughout the film Carl Crew provides voice over narration as Dahmer narrating his internal struggle from Dahmer's first kill in 1978. The movie notes Dahmer's latent homosexual attractions that are intertwined with violent desires, but while the movie acknowledges that point it's never really built upon as we just travel linearly through the killings from 1978 to Dahmer's capture in 1991 with a predictable rhythm of Dahmer lures men to his apartment with a job offer of taking pictures of them, he drugs them, then he tortures or kills them in various ways. The sequences with Dahmer luring and killing the men are accurate to the details of real life events (making the name change of characters pretty pointless as they're basically 1:1 recreations) but aside from a few scenes where police dismissed claims of witness and neighbors of Dahmer which seems like where the real richness of this material should come from, there's not much commentary on why this story needed to be told with Crew's ending monologue about "straying too far from God" just feeling like a hollow wrap-up because they couldn't figure out a more satisfying way of ending this story because there is no story and it's just a loose sequence of events daisy chained together.

From a production standpoint the movie looks cheap and low quality. Not only is the production design and scope very limited, but Crew plays Dahmer from the age of 18 to 31 and at the time Crew was 30 years old and looks it and there's no real effort giving to aging him throughout the movie with makeup or wardrobe and were it not for the title texts telling us where we are in the story you wouldn't be able to know where we are exactly. The movie also shows its budget with the usage of these title texts as it uses them as sticky tape to hold this movie together, glossing over elements like court proceedings such as Dahmer's arrest for enticing a minor. We also get some very odd choices that defy description like flashbacks to 6 year old Jeffrey playing with toy trucks in the yard run through a black and white filter, or a weird scene where Jeffrey is called by a man in a phone booth dressed like a catholic priest who laughs maniacally (yes, really), and all this coupled with the already sloppy production makes for a frustrating and directionless sit that can't justify itself.

The Secret Life: Jeffrey Dahmer is about on the level of any average poorly produced "movie of the week" that was thrown together for the sake of tapping into some controversial topic. The only thing that differentiates Secret Life from The O. J. Simpson Story is that the movie is a little bloodier I guess, but not to the point where it delivers any real exploitative "passed the real of good taste" shock factor and is just a dull directionless movie that doesn't have anything to say about Dahmer other than "we covered him first!". Because that's what this movie is, it's the 1993 VHS equivalent of a comment on a YouTube video that says "FIRST!". Great, you're first.....and?

This is a tough film to review, since several factors need to be taken into account. Let's filter the more judgmental..Ok, are you interested in the facts concerning the serial killer of Jeffrey Dahmer? Can you withstand an independent, low-budget film? Are you objective enough to NOT dislike a film solely due to its lack of stars or professional look? Well, if you said yes then you should have a mind open enough to handle this one. This film is an almost 100% accurate dramatization of Dahmer's adult life and subsequent murder spree, and is styled as an autobiography. It isn't a glamorized, unrealistic account that unfortunately the theatrical film "Dahmer" (2001) was. The movie begins with Dahmer, played quite convincingly by Carl Crew, sitting in the police car as they raid his apartment. His thoughts of what got him there are presented to us in a past-tense, narrated style that accurately explains much of Dahmer's psychoses and motives which led him to commit murder almost 20 times. We get to know the character, both the devious side as well as the side that came moderately close to living a normal life. It isn't anyone's fault but Dahmer's that 17 people died, but being a criminal psychology student, I was pleased to more than just his animalistic side represented, truthfully, in this film. You see him having a loving relationship with his grandmother as well as trying to find companionship, but of course we witness the side of him that everyone remembers. It should be noted that there is little actual onscreen violence, with much of it suggestive in shots such as spattering of blood or a body being struck through a blurred curtain. You do see two deaths that I remember, one being a pretty bloodless throat slash and the other being a man shoved alive into a barrel of acid. While you don't see anything graphic, this cruelty and the convincing acting of both Crew and his victim make this a disturbing scene. And while the actual onscreen mutilation is kept low, you will see the results. There is a prop hand and head or two, but it seems as if this was to disturb the viewer and doesn't look to be exploitive. Besides, these fake anatomical pieces are where the budget limitations are visible. Although acceptable, they look enough like fakes to not be too disturbing. The film actually concludes before Dahmer's death in 1994, due to the fact that it was released a year or two prior. That's about the only big difference from the real story, and the information that remains is, as I've stated, very true to the facts. The film quality could be better, the dialogue often sounds a little too quiet, and the acting of several characters IS a bit hammy, but it's not overboard. In my opinion, this is a flawed but ultimately honest and serious look into one of America's most remembered serial killers. I think it's safe to say the film is memorable as well, and I respect it for overcoming its limitations to deliver the story in a believable manner, aided by a thoroughly excellent Carl Crew as Dahmer.

The Secret Life of Jeffrey Dahmer is a necessary movie. Carl Crew's acting is excellent, especially under the circumstances of a film made from documentary information, about this dull boy, who really has no life at all (within himself, at least). Carl gives the whole as extremely factual, near to the bone but not over-gory, and with emotion too. Although Jeff was known for not being the coolest of guys, and Carl portrayed Jeff in this film to be a teeny bit hip in parts - this was really pretty irrelevant. What was relevant was the facts of Jeff's life, purely! His childhood included, the whole of his years of killing, and the abandonment Jeff felt so often..unbias, nothing blamed. And if anyone was to think that Carl Crew may have 'strange notions' to do the film, he has just gone one step further than those who have written the Dahmer (et al) books, who have gone just one step further than all of the millions of people in the world who study criminology, psychology law etc etc etc. Excellent Film.

Hey what do you expect form a very low budget movie!?!? Although I haven't seen "Dahmer" (2002) I can say that following what the media put out about Jeff this is a pretty accurate depiction. I have studied the Jeffrey Dahmer case and learned all I can about this man. This is a low budget movie but it shows the mentality of a serial killer. If you can get past gore and see what the underlying story of a sick mind. I loved this movie! Just brace yourself for low budget and no blood. Its a story as seen through the eyes of a killer and his actions and thoughts from childhood up through his arrest. My favorite line is : "If they had bothered to look in the back seat it might have saved a lot of lives" Enjoy!

Considering the type of films one usually comes across produced on this low of a budget, Dahmer "The Secret Life", is suprisingly well made. Despite it's shortcomings;tedious scripting and dialouge, sub-par cinematography, and repetative scene structure-(i.e. two or three run-throughs of Dahmer's modus operendii would have been more than sufficient.) definate high points do shine through. Carl Crew's acting job held my interest till the end. Special make-up effects were better than I've seen on alot of "Big Budget" movies. The producers seem to have spent most of the limited funds where it counts most anyway. Overall, I'd rate this movie with three out of a possible four stars.

The acting is funny, let us get that out right away. You will laugh at just how bad the acting is from the victims of Jeffrey Dahmer. The final victim who survive has some of the funniest acting ever. His eyes are huge, his mouth is opened wide, and all he says is "Oh my God, oh No, Oh Jesus." The crimes of Milwaukee's Jeffrey Dahmer is nothing to laugh about, but this movie is downright funny.

And funniest of all, this is the best movie about Jeffrey Dahmer. It details his gruesome killings of men in the 90's, but doesn't really go too deep into his mental state. It is funny because of the bad acting, but it is also chilling too because you know that at any moment, Dahmer was ready to kill, rape, and eat his victims. Dude was hungry, and he didn't have money for food. He hunted his food in the streets of Milwaukee.

Dahmer still continues to live in the mind of Milwaukee, and it seems like every few years people make movies about Dahmer in order to keep his spirit alive. Milwaukee is known for one thing, and that is Jeffrey Dahmer. This is a good movie to watch, might make you squirm at some scenes and laugh at other scenes. This movie surprisingly has a great soundtrack. When Dahmer is killing his victims, the filmmaker decided to put these really cool 80's sounding music in the background. It is a weird thing to do but yea, if you are a fan of Jeffrey Dahmer or are interested in the phenomenon behind Jeffrey Dahmer, the most memorable American serial killer, then give this movie a watch. It is a cheap looking movie, but worth your time.

I bought this used and only payed $1.99 for it. That said, it's worth that kind of money. It's pretty decent for an extreme-low-budget film, but it could have been much better. To me, Carl Crew wasn't believable as Jeffrey Dahmer. He wasn't the right physical type, nor did he speak with Dahmer's distinctive nasal accent. And frankly, the constant "I should have stayed with God" diatribe becomes annoying after a while.

For a more realistic and subdued look at Dahmer's life, see the new film "Dahmer" with Jeremy Renner. Renner's performance as Jeffrey is so dead-on, it's scary. And while it doesn't get into as many of Jeffrey's killings, everyone should already know the basic story by now.

Bottom Line: If you can see this movie cheap, it's worth a look. But the 2002 movie is far superior, in my opinion.

The Secret Life: Jeffrey Dahmer is slightly interesting, but it goes around in circles too much. It never really taps into his mind, or shows why he is, what he is. It just shows Dahmer luring countless victims, and that's it. The special they did on Dahmer on the show Mugshots, was much more informational and interesting. Overall, slightly interesting, but the special they did on the show Mugshots, is far better. ** (out of four)

It's not glitzy or sensationalised but rather an eerily accurate account of the Dahmer tale.