Beau Travail (1999) Poster

(1999)

User Reviews

Review this title
100 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Band of Outsiders...
Xstal7 February 2023
Djibouti sets the scene for this engagement, a foreign legion overseas, on an assignment, lost souls follow traditions, rocky roads fulfil their missions, as the sun beats down and ferments discontent. Galoup has taken aim at Gilles Sentain, the reasons personal, full of disdain, it leads to tension and dissension, abhorrence propagates expulsion, a futile battle, a ridiculous campaign.

In all walks of life people don't get on, or someone despises another for reasons only fathomable to them, but it's only in certain professions, with the mind-sets they promote, that the outcomes can be so devastating and despicable. Often a tough watch, you may ask yourself what lengths you might go to if the opportunity presented in a similar scenario.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The legionnaire
jotix10014 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Claire Denis' loose adaptation of Herman Melville's "Billy Budd", changes the story from taking place on the ocean to the African country of Djibouti, an impoverished nation with an outpost for training of the French Foreign Legion. Ms. Denis, who spent part of her life in Africa, sees the similarities of both stories and together with her co-writer Jean-Pol Fargeau, set to show us how the Melville novel impressed her.

The group of legionnaires, we meet, are seen in different stages of their training. The men, who come from different walks of life, and countries, have nothing to do. The only entertainment for them is dancing with the local women in bars. Galoup, the second in command, of this outpost, is the narrator of the story. We realize he is telling the story from a civilian point of view since he is no longer a legionnaire.

The man in charge, Galoup, is a strange person. He starts noticing how one of his men, the mysterious Sentain, does everything he is assigned to do, and more. When a helicopter crashes and Sentain risks his life in order to save a pilot, the troop commander, Bruno Forrester, suddenly sees in Sentain an courageous man. Forrester also observes how Galoup reacts to Sentain's sudden recognition. It's the commander who tells Galoup that backstabbing doesn't fit in the Foreign Legion, but it's already too late. Galoup, who is consumed in his dislike for Sentain, takes his subordinate into the desert as a punishment, which unknown to him will backfire on him.

Claire Denis has amassed an interesting cast to give life to her vision. Agnes Godard, the cinematographer has shot the film showing us great vistas of Djibouti and the Golf of Aden. The film has the feeling of a ballet as one watches the men's shadows on the ground as they meditate after a grueling training session. Even though there is no clear indication Galoup is gay, but the way he watches Sentain leaves the viewer to think otherwise. The way Galoup touches Forrestier's bracelet is another indication of what is really troubling Galoup, in spite of the fact he is seeing one of the local women.

Denis Lavant, an intense actor, plays Galoup with such control, yet it's clear to see what's eating him. Gregoire Colin, another actor with a great range, hardly utters a word throughout the film, yet, he comes across loud and clear in knowing what his superior is doing to him and being a better man for taking the abuse. Michel Subor is the troop's commander, a man into himself, but wise enough to detect all what's happening to the young people under his command.

Clair Denis created an exquisite work of art. Ms Denis is a director that always delivers. The film solidifies her as one of the best women making movies in France, and all over the world, for that matter.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Legio Patria Nostra
macsvens-14 February 2006
As a 10 year veteran of the Marines during peace time, I loved how this movie captured the often times dull, daily routine of military life. The scenes of the legionaires meticulously ironing their uniforms, training, exercising, were very accurate and brought back a lot of memories. To some, these scenes may seem boring and belabored but I found them mesmerizing and wishing they would last longer. I also feel she somewhat captured the sometimes complicated feelings of love, hate, respect, jealousy, etc. of men living together in a military environment. Robert Ryan did a better job at being hateful in the movie "Billy Budd" than Lavant does here as Galoup. I saw him as more a tragic figure and ended up feeling sorry for him. Sorry because he ruined a life that he loved. The movie was visually beautiful. I was somewhat confused, if not fascinated, by the dance scene at the end. What does that signify?
29 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An effective study on what military life does to human expression.
The Truth21 June 2000
Warning: Spoilers
Claire Denis' Beau travail, alongside Bruno Dumont's L'Humanité, is a French film I wouldn't suggest to those who get easily bored in a movie theater. But if one is willing to forget the conventions of narrative cinema and accept the sometimes documentarian, sometimes corporeally poetic way Beau travail approaches it's subject, this should be a true treat for both the eyes and the mind.

The story of the movie is thin as paper: Galoup, a sergeant in the French Foreign Legion, has to deal with his jealousy when a new recruit called Sentain becomes a hero in the eyes of his men. Alongside Galoup's soldiers, the only other important player in this bizarre drama is Forestier, Galoup's superior, who he obviously admires, but who doesn't share his resentment for Sentain. Gradually, Galoup's envy for Sentain becomes too much for him to take, and his downward spiral begins.

Denis depicts, with great sense for details, how the military routines dominate every aspect of the legionnaires' (and especially Galoup's) life. This is portrayed effectively in the beginning of the film, when the soldiers' crude attempts to dance in a disco are compared to their beautiful, elegant movements during physical training. To Galoup, military discipline has become the only form of self-expression, and for this reason he hates Sentain, who tries to bring a little more humanity to the camp. Or does he? A curious aspect of the film is that we never see any of the things Galoup, in his narrative, accuses Sentain of. Only in the end Sentain acts against Galoup's strict orders, and this could be seen as counterreaction to Galoup's obvious hatred and unreasonable forms of punishment; the humane deed Sentain commits is something any soldier who isn't thoroughly programmed would do. So, since the story is told from Galoup's point of view, it could be argued that he has become paranoid, that as soldier without a war or an enemy he is only looking for an object to his emotional output (which the military life has distorted into hatred and envy), and Sentain, because of his one act of heroism, happens to be an apt target.

The above, however, isn't the only way to interpret the story. It is quite possible that Sentain acts the way Galoup says he does, and this turns the movie into a triangle (or a rectangle) drama between Galoup, Sentain and his men, possibly even his superior. The only thing Galoup's seems to (or is able to) care about is the military, and disciplining the legionnaires is his way of showing his affection. But this balance is broken by Sentain, whom the men admire, and who's actions are approved by Forestier. Since Galoup fears he is about to lose the very substance of his life, he reacts the only way is familiar with: by tightening his rule. Galoup's behaviour is, of course, bound to have repercussions, but there is no other option he can possibly think of.

Besides the way military life takes control of the men, Denis' other obvious point is to show how absurd and pointless the army routines seem in the eyes of an outsider. During the film we see countless training numbers and war excercises and witness the soldiers dull everyday life, but never do we see them doing anything useful. At one time the legionnaires build a camp in the desert, but the only reason for this seems to be Galoup's desire to get some action to the bored men. Beau travail's antimilitaristic theme becomes even more obvious, when the legionnaires' life is shown in contrast of the Africans who neighbour them. These people shepherd their herd, weave mats, sell things, make food, and watch with astonishment as the soldiers dig a hole in the middle of nowhere. The personal drama in the film becomes even more tragic, when Denis shows just how meaningless is the system that produces these kind of human beings. In the terrific final scene of the film we see the whole scale of Galoup's desperation as it becomes obvious, that he could never be anything else than a sad, retired army officer with no chance of fitting into the civilian world.
94 out of 107 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Lighten up people--this is a great film about an outsider
tygyr_tygyr7 January 2004
Going against the trend of reviews here, as is usual for me, I loved this film. Perhaps only another outsider can see how brilliantly Lavant acts the outsider. He is a jealous outsider, jealous of Sentain. He is jealous of him, not in love with him and there is a difference. Galoup (Lavant) truly loves Forestier, but as Galoup points out, Forestier doesn't care. Instead, when Sentain appears, Forestier is attracted to him in a way he was not to Galoup. Well, Sentain is charming, calm, open, attractive, all the things Galoup is not. Sentain is one of the gang, Galoup is an outsider and no matter how hard he tries, he cannot get in. Much of the film is dialogue free, but Lavant admirably shows what he is feeling with his facial and body gestures. And after all that falls out from this jealous rage, Galoup is returned to France but still remains an outsider. No friends in the Legion, nor out of it. And the finale, Galoup dancing by himself in a very contorted way, is one of the most agonizing I have seen. It represents well what Galoup's life is like. You should not see this film if you are looking for a homoerotic experience. It is not about sexuality, but the rage of an outsider. As such, it is brilliant.
52 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Setain and Galoup
arochom1 June 2004
The film's message about the goodness and innocence of Setain, and the malice of Sargeant Galoup, is too subtle for the film's own good, and comes across as being undeveloped.

Why doesn't Galoup more deeply question his hatred for Setain? I was a bit dismayed that this wasn't questioned much, even if there weren't any answers. Also, the film's marketing makes the film sound lurid and sexual, whereas it is not. Perhaps to draw in more viewers for an otherwise dry and sparse depiction of man's senselessness.

The film initially shows a lot of promise. The interaction among the men is more comradeship than anything else. I was interested in the depiction of Legionnaire military life, especially from the various other countries.
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Billy Budd, Revisited
nycritic21 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Every so often a movie comes out that conflicts me, and these are the movies that take me quite a while to analyze. Sometimes it will take a second view to see if I missed some vital element, or it will dawn on me later, and thus I will have grasped what it was that at the moment seemed rather inconsequential. BEAU TRAVAIL, Claire Denis' 1999 film, is one of these movies. It is an adaptation of Herman Melville's "Billy Budd" -- although adaptation should be expressed in a loose term. It tells the story of an army troop stationed at Djibouti, training endlessly under the firm hand of a nearly expressionless Denis Lavant, himself a training machine, and the arrival of a young soldier played by the very beautiful Gregoire Colin who becomes the catalyst that triggers a response from Lavant. Colin, as Sentain, is the young rookie everyone loves and admires; he has great beauty and is the epitome of masculinity. This ticks Lavant's Galoup to approach Sentain at an oblique angle, and a scene in which both men face off resembles that of two lions about to attack and is a sequence of immense beauty because you see the hardened expression on Lavant's leonine face pitted against Colin's frightened yet set facade. This is what cinema is supposed to do: tell a story without too much dialogue, maybe a voice-over here or there as BEAU TRAVAIL does, and then get to its denouement, which in this movie is made more ironic than tragic. Where it falters a little is in its portentous score with a male chorus which is lifted from the opera version: it's too intrusive and is reminiscent of the score used for 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, but there it had a purpose; here, I didn't see it. Frequent incursions into dance music also distract a little from the meat of the story. What I do admire is Denis' approach to the material. In bringing a strong homoerotic element to the scene, she also manages to do what few gay directors have done: create a visually mesmerizing work of art where male passion is expressed through what is appropriate of the gender: physical activity. It's what I've always wanted to see: an aggressive ballet of masculine energy which unfolds a deceptively simple story of attraction, repulsion, and envy. Highly recommended.
19 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enigmatic.
the red duchess2 August 2000
Like all Claire Denis films, 'Beau Travail' demands constant vigilance and flexibility, never exactly forswearing narrative - there IS a plot here - but concentrating less on its mechanics than on the bits in between, the everyday rituals normally excised from the screen, a precise meditation on the landscape in which it is set, a rhythmic treatment of the titled beau travail, all seemingly irrelevant to the narrative, but making it inevitable, a linear narrative in a world of endless, pointless circles.

Like 'Once Upon A Time In America', 'Travail' opens with a sequence of seemingly random, unconnected sequences eventually bound together in an overpowering organising consciousness. A shot of a silhouetted mural of soldiers marching over craggy rocks, which look like waves, an appropriately Melvillean image, with Foreign Legion chants blared over them. The highly stylised rendering of a nightclub, which seems tiny, austere, minimally decorated, with lighting reflecting the rhythm of the music, and the soldiers between the local African women, their movements notably stilted, ritualised. The officer seated alone. The vast African landscape, a coastal desert, with abandoned phallic tanks, site of a military exercise, a group of topless men in rigid poses against the immemorial sand and sea, classical heroes. An unseen hand writing. A train travelling through the landscape as we follow someone's view out the window. The same point of view after the train has moved.

These images do have an independent function. They begin a pattern of dualities that are continued and complicated throughout the film leading to the eventual climax, always inscrutably observed by a third strand, Forestier, former informer turned commandant - water/desert; soldiers/locals; men/women; landscape/human; indoors/outdoors; play/work etc. But this is an army, and these disparate elements must be controlled, as they are, by Galoup, the sergeant. As the film opens, he embodies civilisation - he writes while others cannot communicate; he is the subject who sees, interprets, explains, while everyone else is an object in his narrative; he wears clothes while his soldiers go round naked; he is an all-seeing God who can decide men's fate, while these men are unthinking robots, sleepwalking through time-honoured rites.

The irony is that, because of all this, Galoup, the defender of discipline and convention, is the film's real outsider, not the mysterious Russian he seeks to expel, a man who learns another language to fit in, who quickly becomes one of the boys, who will defend his friends at the risk of his own death.

Is this why Galoup abhors him, his humanity in this mechanistic unit of marital discipline? Unlikely; Galoup is the only 'human' character in the film, it's difficult to tell individual soldiers, even Sentain. After all, that 's what the Foreign Legion, in popular terms anyway, is all about: a refuge for the hunted, somewhere to hide your identity and past, become part of an anonymous mass.

For me, though, there is something missing. For all the cool gazing on the masculine body, the absorbed interest in these very physical rituals, in the feminising of their military discipline (eg ironing; repeating the same tasks day in, day out, like housewives); there is a lack of the homoerotic charge lurching through Melville and Britten. The gaze of the camera is, of course, Galoup's, the narrative a visualising of what he writes; and when he lies on the bed with his gun near the end, we can't tell whether the gesture will be onanistic or suicidal. The rushed, hallucinatory climax, full of Leonesque stand-offs and ellipses, are framed by a shot of Galoup asleep, and a blazing white light when he awakes, as if he, like Noodles, has dreamed the whole thing, has sublimated his homosexuality into a murderous (but consummated) narrative, reduced vast geographical terrain (including three volcanoes whose explosive potential mirrors his own suppressed desire) to a narrow site for a private rite, a self-reflecting dance in an empty nightclub.

And how cool is it that the real president of Djibouti is called Ismael!
35 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Masterful, beautifully shot elegy for the warrior ethos
gans21 February 2001
_Beau travail_ gives proof that French cinema can still produce masterpieces. This adaptation of Melville focuses on Vere rather than Billy and on a ritualistic masculine life that has lost its function and degenerated into sterile rivalry. It shows the subtle triumph of the female principle in this harsh environment without ever striking a discordant ideological note. The cinematography displaying the men against the desert is breathtaking, and the rhythm of the narrative sequences builds tension with a brilliant economy of means. Even the French is beautifully written. The best French film I've seen in years (and I've seen quite a few).
45 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
All the ingredients of a superb film...just not mixed yet!
gradyharp20 May 2006
BEAU TRAVAIL is a curious film. It is based on the story 'Billy Budd' by Herman Melville and on the operatic adaptation by EM Forster of Benjamin Britten's magnificent BILLY BUDD and has all the right pieces in place to make a fine, updated adaptation of the story. Unfortunately the script fails to find the message of the story and so there is much correct atmosphere but little character development.

The original story revolves around a warship (The Rights o' Man) in the French and English war that takes on recruits while at sea. The Captain relates the story of how he was forced to hang the magnificently beautiful and loved new recruit Billy Budd because of an accidental death in part due to Budd's fatal flaw - his stammer. The Master at Arms notices Billy from the beginning as a creature of physical beauty and there is a strong physical attraction to the lad. Unable to cope with his feelings, the Master at Arms plots for the downfall of the object of his desire and lust and it is his manipulation that results in Billy's hanging, nearly causing a mutiny by Billy's shipmates. Billy is a Parsifal character - a 'guileless fool', who even in his sentencing to death still blesses the Captain of the ship.

All well and good. The film here transplants much of this tale to a Foreign Legion outpost in Africa, and much of the above is insinuated. The appropriation is so complete that portions of Britten's opera BILLY BUDD are used to set scenes. But there the magic stops. The 'master at arms' does not seem to desire the beautiful recruit but for some unexplained reason seeks to have him gone. Such a shame. It is as though the writer wanted to avoid homosexual overtones of the original and as a result the characters have no where to go. All of the actors are good, the scenery is bleak (a desert here instead of the bleak sea of the original)and appropriate, the music is an eclectic mix that works. All the ingredients are here to make a fine film, but it just doesn't come off. The director needed to see the old film version of Billy Budd starring Terrence Stamp to see that pitting the evil, sadistic, lusty master at arms against the virile, sensitive and good young man can and does work well.
27 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No ordinary love
chaos-rampant13 April 2011
Abstract film, told by contrasts, stylized swathes of life, Claires Denis stumbles upon little that is new here, but something here intrigues me a lot, most of it in the first half.

The rites, rituals and ceremonial pomp by which army units in the line of fire choose to mythologize and invoke a story of heroic braggadoccio, which Claires Denis approaches with a curious air of the solemn and the mocking, I only briefly experienced in my short time with an infantry regime. I served most of my army time in the Technician Corps, the inglorious greasemonkeys, repairing tanks or slacking. But the tedium of army life is our shared legacy with the Foreign Legion or the Special Ops.

Denis subverts this, in mocking feminism reducing that tedium to the meticulous ironing and creasing of uniforms and laundry. The savage beast is thus shown to be domesticated, fussing over a crease. It's been a man's cinema this first century, so perhaps we should get accustomed to the scorn and irony of female directors getting back at us. Nevertheless she makes a cutting remark, that fastidiousness (a matter of order and appearances) is accomplished with these creases.

Inside the discotheque, where the strobe lights and Arab pop beats are equally kitsch and otherworldly, the woman is mysterious and alluring, exudes promises of sexual danger. In this game of seduction, the Legionnaires are rapacious, overly eager boys, crossing and recrossing before the seductive female gaze and smile. This first part for me is two images. The flickering shot of an Arab girl's face, gleaming with strobing colorful lights, and the shot of Legionnaires etched in silhouette in an empty street by night.

Here lies the brilliance of Denis though. We know the emerging story of a cruel superior taking an unfathomable dislike to the innocent footsoldier from Billy Bud, Herman Melville's short story, and how that innocence of face invites a hatred that seethes deeper, but Denis reworks this entirely in terms of cinema. Looking at the sergeant's face we can read the portents of evil to come, but she further paints it with pictures.

Ideals don't matter here, so Denis aptly carries her tragedy out to a sunbaked rocky desert. Perhaps she understood what she was doing as an opera, but in those scenes where we see men flexing their muscles or performing curious rituals out in the open air, the bombast of music and image verges on camp. I don't know much about camp though, so this doesn't concern me overmuch. She also gives us a tracking shot and a wistful tune in the soundtrack, which I find both to be beneath the filmmaking she exhibits in the rest of the film.

Elsewhere she gives us images of colonial guilt, a popular subject of the European intellectual, where for example a process of Legionnaires carry a black man, then they switch and he carries a white man on his shoulders. The Djibouti natives of that desert mostly observe this ritual of male aggression with indifference though, curiosity or compassion.

A lot of what the film does is only fair, and although thematically it leaves me unfulfilled, the apogee for me is the lasting impression. Of which Beau Travail leaves a strong one.
21 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Most powerful ending since Tarkovsky's "Andrei Rublev"
gabridl8 December 2000
"French Foreign Legion of the mind" is close, but I think a better epitome would be a meditation on wasted potential. If there is a theme that runs through Claire Denis' movies, it is civilization and its discontents, and this is her best work on the subject yet. The imagery alludes to Antonioni's "The Passenger" and rightly so: both films treat the annihilation of identity, although Denis' vision is ultimately darker. The last scene is the most haunting since the ending to Tarkovsky's "Andrei Rublev."

Sure, the voice-over is awkward, but Calvin Klein is absolutely the wrong referent here. Far apter would be Leni Riefenstahl.
23 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Intriguing Woman's Eye on a Macho Genre
noralee12 January 2006
"Beau Travail" uniquely provides a woman's eye, director/co-writer Claire Denis, on the movie genre of taut men in groups, peace time military subset, with much less profanity or crudeness or misogyny than is typical.

The camera loves looking at all these half naked, trim, fit young men, as they are seen over and over in all kinds of repetitive physical exertions, from the usual military obstacle courses to martial arts exercises that look like tai chi, to ones that seem like yoga and then banging against each other. (Surely these images must have influenced the later directors of "Tigerland" and "Jarhead.") It is amusing to see them busily ironing clothes in order to get the required creases in their uniforms. I haven't seen such a sensual scene of men ironing since Kevin Costner in "Bull Durham."

The narrating sergeant "Galoup" is the usual strict bully, punishingly competitive in all these exercises. But I completely missed that the film was an adaptation of "Billy Budd" until I saw the closing credits that referenced the Britten opera on the soundtrack because the object of his attention, "Sentain," doesn't seem like a helpless victim.

Unlike all movies about the duress of basic training and keeping enlisted men in line, the story is not from the point of view of this victim, but is told as a flashback by the sergeant with lots of references to what is lost and found (we hear "perdu" and "trouve" a lot though some is lost in translation as idioms are poorly translated in the subtitles, such as of sang froid).

The sergeant seems out of "The Bridge Over the River Kwai" school, setting the under-employed Foreign Legionnaires posted on the coast of Djibouti to work repairing deserted roads and literally digging holes in the desert to work out his frustrations.

The orphan just gets under his burr until he intentionally provokes him to the limit. It is certainly not clear what it is about him that annoys the sergeant. His lean beauty? His casual heroism? Even if there's some conflicted homosexual urges, and the sensuality of the local African environment and music are continually emphasized, amidst the homo-erotic subtext, the sergeant clearly has the hots for a young local woman.

We don't get to learn much about the individual Legionnaires. The commandant, the crusty Michel Subor, is comfortable as a career soldier and, surprisingly in this genre, does support a sense of fair play and justice, as symbolized by his chess playing. He keeps insisting the men are no longer Russian or African but now are loyal to the Legion (as we keep hearing the anthem over and over). There is some grudging tolerance of the exoticism of diversity, even as the Muslims are teased during Ramadan.

Even as viewed on video tape, the setting and contrasts in Africa are beautiful – from the desert to the sparkling bright ocean, but the narration is annoying, even as it ties together the memories of regret.

The music is very evocative of the setting. The curving sensuality of night time African dance clubs and the women dancing is contrasted with the formality of the men's exercising. So I think in the conclusion the sergeant is finally trying to integrate all his experiences to the tune of "Spirit of the Night."
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Elegant But Insubstantial
gftbiloxi5 April 2005
Introspective and subtle, Claire Denis' BEAU TRAVAIL offers a modern retelling of Herman Melville's BILLY BUDD, transposing the tale of an officer who self-destructs through his jealousy of a new recruit to an outpost of the French Foreign Legion. And although the film is elegant in both its simplicity and purity, I myself found it a shade too simple and pure to be completely effective.

Still, BEAU TRAVAIL has two things going for it: director Denis' cinematic eye and superior performances throughout. One truly senses the location in all its elemental nature, and the cinematography is remarkable for its restrained elegance. The cast follows suit, with direct and underplayed performances that fold seamlessly into both Denis' atmosphere and the story itself, and the result is often quite stylish.

But for all its elegance and style, I found BEAU TRAVAIL too introspective and subtle for its own good; to me it lacks any significant substance, with both story and characters slipping through my attention as easily as sand slips through my hand. While this is doubtlessly part of director Denis' intent, and while I have admired many a film with a notably elusive touch, my ultimate reaction to BEAU TRAVAIL is that it is a rather superficial exercise in style over substance, and I cannot say that it leads me to interest in the director's other work.

In passing, I also note that BEAU TRAVAIL is often marketed as a film with homoerotic context and imagery, but I personally did not find it so. Final word: worth a look, but not greatly memorable for all that.

Gary F. Taylor, aka GFT, Amazon Reviewer
24 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A very feminine film about masculinity
dawidbleja14 August 2000
The medium of film is blessed with the fact that with it, it is possible to exploit the merits of almost every artform. Film can make use of still imagery, like painting and photography, and three-dimensional (albeit in a virtual sense) imagery, like sculpture. It is music with visuals - theatre without physical restrictions. Hence, the possibilities of film are more numerous than any one other artform. However, the medium's potential remains largely unexplored, as very few film-makers venture far past conventional dialogue-based storytelling. As a means of story-telling, film is inferior to literature. The book, after all, is almost always better than the film. Dialogue-based storytelling is simply not the medium's forté. Claire Denis, with Beau Travail, has reminded us of this by making a beautiful , and powerful, film which is told largely through imagery. The subject of Beau Travail is very masculine: Men in the foreign legion - and in particular, one man's bitter obsession with another when he feels his 'alpha male' status threatened. The manner in which the film is made, however, is very feminine. Instead of a logical, cause-and-effect structure, the film has an ethereal fluidity. It is less made up of scenes, than it is of dozens of segments - most of them devoid of a narrative - which flow in and out past each other, sometimes reappearing later on, sometimes not. In one such segment, the tense relationship between Galoup and Sentain is shown as the two, eyes fixed, circle each other as if in some sort of surreal, hate-driven ritual. This moment, while being far removed from real human behaviour is, through its striking symbolism, as telling of the characters' inner experiences as any dialogue between them could be. Denis focuses on the details of the mens' lives in long, fascinated shots, observing almost every element of their lives - how they exercise, rest, fight, dance, swim, iron, eat, and hate. She sees the beauty of both the men and the world they inhabit, and shows this beauty as an integral (if not THE integral) part of the film. These many studied observations are small elements that, together, make up a remarkably rich whole. They form a film which has a depth and subtlety of perception which most male directors could not, in my opinion, achieve.

Written by Dawid Bleja
18 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
And so an army passes in the night
tieman6411 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
"Gold in the mountain, and gold in the glen, and greed in the heart, heaven having no part, and unsatisfied men." - Melville

Claire Denis directs "Beau Travail". The film's loosely based on several Herman Melville poems ("The Night March" and "Gold in the Mountain"), as well as Melville's "Billy Budd", a maritime tale which questioned man's thoughtless submission to various forms of authority (military, media, biblical, political etc). Denis' film swaps the novella's maritime setting for the sandy deserts of Djibouti, a country in Eastern Africa. Her protagonists are soldiers in the French Foreign Legion. They're stationed in Djibouti to do the neo-Imperialist biddings of France and (unofficially) the US, who to this day maintain violent, dictatorial puppet regimes in the country. The site of the only "official" US military bases on the African continent, the country is also used as a staging ground in an overall strategy to dominate the Horn of Africa, the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Peninsula. From Djibouti, various plots were, and continue to be, mounted to destabilise Ethiopia and Somalia.

"Different viewpoints count," Sergeant Galoup (Denis Lavant) narrates at the start of the film. He's speaking in hindsight. The film then jumps from Galoup's apartment in France to the deserts of Djibouti, several months prior. Here Galoup feuds with Gilles, a fellow soldier whose physical beauty, social standing and strength inexplicably make him jealous. Later Galoup orders Gilles to trek across the African desert without water and with a tampered compass. The man almost dies, leading to Galup's swift court-martial. Significantly, Gilles is rescued by a group of Djiboutis. Other scenes focus on the persecution of black officers within the Foreign Legion. The film ends with close-ups of Galoup's veins, quietly pumping blood, before a beautiful sequence in which he dances to Corona's "The Rhythm of the Night".

More than Melville, key influences on the picture are Jean-Luc Godard's "Le Petit Soldat" and Resnais' "Muriel". Both dealt with the Algerian war, a then-taboo subject which led to both films being attacked and banned. Denis' film maintains the structure and voice-over narration of Godard's film, linkages which are made explicit by the military superior in her film being named after the hero of Godard's. They're also played by the same actor (Michel Subor). Interestingly, the voice over narration in both films are designed to echo each other. "I have a lot of time ahead of me," the narrators of Denis' film begins, precisely the line which ends Godard's picture. The message is clear. History rolls on, and France's imperialist doings didn't end with Algeria.

Denis spent much of her childhood in Djibouti. She wrote "Beau Travail's" script herself and teamed up with female cinematographer Agnes Godard for the shoot. The duo create a film which plays like a series of dreams within dreams, mirages within mirages, memory fragments constantly dancing and fusing and fluttering off into the wind. The film unfolds like dance, ethereal, hazy and liquid. Most of its running time consists of shots of soldiers training, working, exercising and waiting. These sequences are simultaneously banal and highly choreographed, the men's bodies bending to some unspoken dance routine.

Throughout the film Denis captures the dangers of machismo, male egos and a kind of simmering hunger for violence. But her imagery is both homo-erotic and neutering; these warriors are feminized, painted as infants, small boys, sensitive, confused, pitifully childish and overly emotional. Denis softens everything, turns masculinity into something weak and soft and round, which indeed was always the unspoken core of even "traditional masculinity". Still, these soldiers are dangerous. And they are dangerous precisely because of their weaknesses. Most of the film functions as a dreamy allegory for the white man's desire to violently assert himself over the Other, be they African or fellowman; to deny the Other's culture, voice, customs, practises or right-of-governance. Galoup in particular is obsessed with control, organisation and the meticulous. Some have said the film is about Galoup's "homosexuality", but this misses the point. Whilst all sexuality is on some level violent, the film itself is almost completely asexual. The soldiers have been conditioned to repress love, not sex, and it is this conditioning which flies in the face of the men's homo-social love, which in turn results in violent blow-back.

The film's title means "beautiful work", referring ironically to the Empire's work in Africa, and of course its long-standing rationalisations for bloodshed. The film's title is also a command, a call to do "good work" rather than the devil's deeds. Much of the film is sprinkled with shots of African women, who exist outside the soldiers' story. Like a Greek chorus, they're positioned to both witnesses white cruelty, silently judging from afar, and to mock the petty men skirmishing below them. The gyrations of these African women to pop songs is later mirrored to Galoup's own dance sequence (no rehearsals, shot in one take), in which his ego softens, he symbolically turns his back to a reflection of himself and he finally cuts loose. This is the only moment in the film in which Galoup shifts from a watcher and subject - and by extension a master - to an object. He relinquishes control and allows us to possess a piece of him.

Denis' work frequently deals with the Empire's relationship with Africa ("White Material", "No Fear, No Die", "Chocolat", "35 Shots of Rum" etc). Of these, "Beau Travail" is perhaps her most unconventional film. See too "35 Shots of Rum", arguably a better film, which uses Jean Renoir as a springboard as Denis uses Godard here.

8.5/10 – Worth two viewings.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An interesting but rather disappointing film
mob61uk31 July 2002
As with Denis' latest UK release - "Trouble Every Day (2001)" - there is much to admire in this film. This study of an ex-Legionnaire looking back on his army life, and the jealousy that leads to his dismissal, powerfully depicts the claustrophobic macho lifestyle amidst the bleak African landscapes. However, as with "Trouble" I was left feeling let down by the end. The drama of the film is so contained and understated, that I thought it seems to peter out into nothing. I found this an interesting but rather disappointing film.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beau Travail
jboothmillard1 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die is a book that has given me many titles I would never heard of or seen before reading it, and this French film is another of those films inside that I was looking forward to trying. Basically ex-Foreign Legion master sergeant officer Galoup (Denis Lavant) is reminiscing about his time leading his men, under the direction of Commander Bruno Forestier (Michel Subor), in the desert, mostly supervising the psychical exercise and other routine duties. The troop is one day joined by good looking, socially skilled and bold Gilles Sentain (Grégoire Colin), who Galoup becomes malicious of, there are suggestions of possible homosexual feelings awakened as well. There is a point when Sentain disobeys his orders to save another soldier, and there is a chance to destroy him for the master sergeant, so he punishes him sticking him in the middle of the desert and forced to walk back to base. Galoup makes this impossible for him with the lack of drinking water and a broken compass, so Sentain looks doomed to suffer exhaustion and dehydration, but he is found and rescued on the salt flats by a group of Djiboutis. In the end Galoup is given a court martial, his time ended in the Foreign Legion and sent back to France, and he is supposedly going to commit suicide, but the ending seems to be an all over the place interpretive dance. The acting is as good as you can get, especially good is Lavant, I may not have understood the full story, but I was engaged by many moments of the film. Most memorable moments were the fantastic disco scenes with great soundtrack, like the French dub of "Kiss Kiss" by Holly Valance (or "Simarik"), and the final dance to "The Rhythm of the Night" by Corona, and the exercise training and desert walk scenes stand out, overall it is an intriguing psychological drama. Very good!
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
beau travail
mossgrymk22 October 2020
This is an intense examination, very loosely based on Melville's "Billy Budd", of the corrosive effects of military life, that is visually stunning. Indeed, at times it is too much so. One wishes that director Claire Denis had paid more attention to crucial story points, such as why Galoup admires his commandant Forestier to the extent of becoming morbidly jealous of Forestier's interest in a young soldier, and, conversely, why Forestier rejects Galoup's admiration. Absent such attention to character and motivation the viewer is too often left with a series of powerful images, courtesy of brilliant cinematographer Agnes Godard, of half naked, well muscled male legionaires swimming, fighting, laughing and suffering in a barren yet harshly beautiful coastal desert landscape; images that are, alas, untethered to people with whom the viewer can identify or empathize because he or she simply knows too little about them. Still, this is the first Claire Denis film I've seen and I am eager to view others. Give it a B plus.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Insightful Film
harry-766 October 2000
Anyone who thinks the Foreign Legion is romantic adventure or easy escapism, might take a look at Claire Dennis' "Beau Travail." Day to day drilling is depicted in great detail in this unusual film set in a remote African post.

There's really nothing glamourous about it, and if one can go by this enactment, the whole thing is rather grim. Under a beautiful blue sky and surrounding picturesque landscape two dozen men go at their exercises, drills, and games with disciplined precision. But for what?

What kind of individual is drawn to this life? Societal dropouts? Weak decision makers? Criminals on the run? The French Foreign Legion has a reputation of asking no questions on a candidate's background. If he qualifies physically and pledges loyalty, he's accepted. He then abandons the task of making personal choices; that's done for him. Obey orders, keep your mouth shut, and you'll get along.

Don't expect Wertmuller- or Riefenstal-quality film work here, yet Dennis has talent and skill in capturing the stark realism of her subject. Many scenes have an impact that will tend to remain in the memory; she most certainly has made a statement with "Good Work." ###
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Unquestionably, undeniably a masterpiece. Absolutely
gjsims5 August 2000
If indescribable visual beauty, extraordinary subtlety, intelligence and poetic/elliptical narrative are amongst those things you value in cinema, then this film will not only not disappoint, it will become one of the benchmarks by which you measure all subsequent and previous narrative films. A film that is so exquisitely and intelligently crafted, choreographed and stylised that it defies belief. Its images will remain engraved in your memory for a long, long time - especially, perhaps, the astonishing final scene... As a specialist in French cinema, I would place "Beau travail" amongst the best French (and not just French) films ever made. On leaving the cinema, I overheard someone muttering about the "absence of a plot-line". And, indeed, "Beau travail" is definitely not for lazy spectators who need to be taken and held by the hand...
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Beautiful images, plot minimalism, lot of young flesh and fashionable gay undertones in ultramacho institutions. Weirdly and wildly overrated.
Falkner19769 December 2022
We have an isolated detachment of legionnaires, a disciplined group of recruits who train to function with the precision of a single machine; and we have a dark and lonely officer, who feels displaced between the body of legionaries he commands and the commander he obeys.

As a representation of the life of the legionnaires it is little short of laughable, and everything seems an excuse for Claire Denis to focus on the rhythm of male bodies performing pseudo-military routines with the same aftertaste with which Riefensthal filmed pole vaulters, obsessed with the repetition, perfection and variation of the same exercises, as well as in strange choreographies that are treated as if they were rituals and dances of the Nuba.

Everything is reduced to the typical fashionable look at machismo and the traditional roles associated with masculinity, with the critical tone of a feminist and the drooling fascination of a pretty hot teenager at the same time. In the end, the legionary discipline seems to serve to show how the soldiers rub against each other, or do the laundry clad in tight shorts, and we have a whole homoerotic hymn to camaraderie and male rivalry. We already know that for some feminists, behind any hypermasculine and macho institution there is some latent homosexuality. As such, it would be the reverse of so many stories about women filmed by men and that also had a certain homosexual undertone (Ford's 7 women, for example).

The story, very thin and for which Denis shows a secondary interest, is nothing more than an underdeveloped plot of jealousy, hatred and exclusion, an imaginary love triangle, with the main character Galoup (Denis Lavant, absolutely brilliant), fascinated by his superior and at the same time by Sentain, a handsome and newly arrived legionnaire (the deadpan Grégoire Colin). Threatened by what he doesn't quite know, he will indulge in a destructive fixation to finish off Sentain. Anyway, it's the story of Melville's Billy Budd, and indeed, fragments of Britten's opera are scattered throughout the soundtrack.

The footage consists mainly in idle time, with the legionnaires engaged in domestic chores or military routines, always obsessively focused on the muscular bodies of the youngsters, reified as if they were a group of Pasolini's Argonauts, with the excuse of camaraderie. Treated as an institution and not as human beings, there is not the slightest individualization.

The women only appear tangentially, also objectified and as a mere sexual object, while they offer themselves dancing in a disco. If the male ensemble seems to have its vocation as a group in perfecting this military machine of power and dominance, or rather in optimizing the bodily capacities of each piece of that machine, in women the function is reduced to an always available chorus of prostitutes, solace for the warriors when these have some spare time.

If it pretends to be a microcosm of what society is, the vision is of absolute simplicity, myopia, extremism and reductionism, but it is what we can expect nowadays.

The film benefits from beautiful locations, impressive cinematography and the presence of the always extraordinary Denis Lavant (who performs a most striking gymnastic dance at the end of the film); but we cannot help but feel that the footage is excessive, that in the end it tells us very little, and that most of the film goes into showing the bodies of the young legionnaires.

One of those films that a certain sector of critics inevitably like, due to the good work of the director, the careful visual aspect and certain ambiguous connotations. All style without substance. Its ideas are in the current wave, but they are overwhelmingly simplistic. This is of course it's moment.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Rhythms and limits of Control with captivating if distanced direction and a brilliant Denis Levant
Quinoa198417 March 2022
I've read a number of takes on here that a strong theme for this and particularly with Denis Levant's Galoup is jealousy, but what I thought I saw as more potent and compelling as a consistent idea here was exploring control.

For men in a military situation control is what it's all about, keeping in control of one's own skill set and physicality, being able to control one's body over a big wall or doing push ups or firing a gun or, of course, of one's emotions. It's control that Galoup wants to see with his men but in himself especially; look how he has to make sure those plates are just so, or how his soldiers are ironing their clothes. A Commandant with so little to actually *do* and without any real battle to fight, and may have some self loathing over his station (that's more on the actor's countenance which I'll get to), it's a bad combination. Beau Travail is most fascinating as a series of poetic-meditative-physical portraits on control, the lack of it, losing it and (by the very end) embracing the loss of it.

It's not always a sit that is easiest to take as a conventional narrative - other reviews behave noted the aspect of this all being like dance than a solid plot, like to my mind even another existential film about the mundanity of military men without any goals like Jarhead is more full of action than this - but it is what kept me engaged, more often than not. There are times where it is more functioning like an experimental film where it's about how bodies and masculinity itself can bend and fold and sweat and do a dozen other things (and yes, hugging is as intensive as crawling on the ground under wires, man that's an amazing beat), though I think my expectation of there being more tension, gay or otherwise, between Galoup and Sentain made me wonder "where is this going, ok there's more male bonding over a fire and grunting and oh birthday cake."

Perhaps it's all one steady stream of masculine harrowing malaise and frustration, of how these bodies tasked to do things like (as if prisoners) breaking rocks in the hot African sun or walking as a brooding pack at night on a road making a car practically go around them, it's all of a piece where you can feel director Claire Denis filming this in a distinctly and demandingly poetic style. It's all about what the camera through visual movement, of these bodies and faces - more so by design the bodies, as I don't think any of them outside of Galoup, Sentain, who is the new guy, and Forestier the man above Galoup and has his own tortured military past (Algeria is name dropped), have names to speak of. Adding to this is the music and sound design which is coarse and abrasive, like the feeling of getting one of the soldier's boots under your chin.

In a way it's a more engrossing film to think about once it ends than to experience in the moment. But that But that brings me back to Levant, who definitely makes this closer to a must see than anything. That's really Denis's masterstroke as a filmmaker is to cast him as he's the kind of performer who almost can't help but be interesting when he's doing very little on camera - or I should say I have to wonder how sparse the screenplay was or if at times Denis gave Levant direction to do something and he took it to a place she wasn't expecting.

Of course when he goes large with his movements he is mesmerizing, but it's also how he can give a glance or a look to someone in his group of legionnaires, or of course Sentain who I wish got a few more lines (I don't even need more of a backstory than what we got, just a little more personality to make Galoup's obsessiveness over him make sense). And once it gets towards the latter part of the film, where this tension is mounting even further for Galoup, Levant can show it through his inaction if that makes sense, how he lays on a bed or holds a gun or drives away in the truck in that desolate wasteland. There's so much in his eyes, in even something out of his control like a throbbing vein, it's wonderful work (and all the more surprising he didn't get time to do prep work due to scheduling issues, according to an interview with Criterion.

Aa for the dancing at the end, I'm sure other writers have spoken more at wiser length than I can, but it does put to a great point what I mentioned earlier about control; he's lost his station in life but now he's free to tear up the friggin dance floor and let go of the control that he's held on to - or maybe opposite that it's held over him. The rigors of masculinity and discipline, of how men are "supposed" to be in some unspoken but totally recognized code of conduct or manners or whatever is on display throughout the film, to a practical fetishistic degree is on display in Beau Travail, and we know it is because Denis contrasts it with the native Djibuti peoples who are more natural and calm and friendly and sensual, and if the ending is extraordinary it's because the filmmakers and Levant earn this explosion of emotional release (or rescue even) from the patriarchal chokehold of control.

So, this is unique and with an absorbing lead performance. If it let me in even a smidgen more emotionally it'd be one of my favorite films of its year.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The disenchantment of a French Legionnaire
ruby_fff29 May 2000
There's poetry in the bleakness of this film's presentation. Claire Denis ("Chocolat" 1988), bold and forward in her directions, has such clarity in delivering complex emotional struggles yet in a simple manner. The military drills of the French Legionnaires were captured like ballet disciplines; camera angles gave us quite different views of what could be a dull routine soldier's duty or exercise. Director Denis is not afraid to show the harsh reality and what may be society's disapproving actions the central character is demonstrating; yet it's not thrust at us -- it's almost by subliminal osmosis: through the low key narration of the central character, his jotting down thoughts on paper, actor Denis Lavant's sergeant Galoup's expressive expresssionless face, we are somehow pulled into his "cruel" intentions. He knows he's being "evil" -- he's so numbed by the years spent in the Legion that he cares no more -- moral or right or not -- he's going to do it, to destroy the youthfully strong new recruit whom he envied that he himself is no more. It's pathetic, yet it's not quite presented so. Different subject though it may, this is a more direct "passion of mind" layered depiction with deeper impact and meaning, vs. the Demi Moore's esoteric saccharine version of so named film "Passion of Mind". It could be slow moving for some -- definitely NFE. It's set in East Africa at Djibouti, by the coast near the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, with beautiful landscape shots of the desert juxtaposed with blue green sea and aqua shots. It also has occasional African musical rhythm and natives in colorful costumes. If you appreciate filmmaking, then this is worth experiencing.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It could have been good.
ib-4411 April 2009
A remake of Billy Budd in the context of the French Foreign Legion is a brilliant idea. Changing the point of view to the older, envious Sr NCO is also a brilliant idea. The film is beautifully shot.

However... This has to be least convincing portrayal of everyday life in the Legion ever made. Young Legionaires don't have birthday parties with their CO. And they don't spend a lot of time frolicking on the beach. It's true they do spend a lot of time ironing, doing laundry, and holes, but the rigid discipline and hyper-masculinity that the Legion is known for is nowhere to be seen. My disbelief could not be suspended.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed