The Devil's Arithmetic (TV Movie 1999) Poster

(1999 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
72 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A worthwhile Effort
nicholas.rhodes4 February 2005
I had read about this film on a site about time-travel movies ( my favorite type of films) and had been waiting for it to come out on DVD. This has happened in the USA, and also in the UK and Belgium. Not so in France, however, where the film is TOTALLY unknown, a strange state of affairs for a country which is only now trying to atone for its treatment of its Jewish population of 60 years ago, whereas in most other countries, all that is past history.

I have read other comments about this film and there seem to be equal amounts of negative and positive comments. For my part, I firmly come out IN FAVOUR of the film. Picture quality is excellent, so is the acting. I do have qualms on certain issues ( the camps seem too clean and too small, the Nazis don't seem evil enough ) but this is a very subjective judgement, and all really depends on what the spectator is "looking for". Obviously he/she who prefers "the more sordid and the more violent (and therefore supposedly the more realistic - though that's a question for debate ) the better" will be disappointed. True, the film is somewhat sanitized. But this shortcoming, if it can be termed as such, is secondary. I see the film not as a documentary on the holocaust, nor a piece of anti-Nazi propaganda, but rather the journey of a young lady thru time into a fantasy world where she is "taught" the importance of her heritage. Other people have made the point, which I agree on, that the film is an "efficient" way of introducing the holocaust to children who may be ignorant of it - and on that score alone justifies its' having been made.

Obviously there is a moralistic tone "you-don't-care-about-your heritage-so-I'm-going-to-teach-you-a-lesson-you-won't-forget' but beyond that it's interesting to see how the young protagonist passes from modern life and body tattoos to completely different surroundings and somehow adapts to it. It is like someone being suddenly whisked from this life, for example, blown up in an explosion, and immediately reincarnating another body in another time frame. Of course, each and every one of us would react differently to this situation, but the film on that level at least seems highly plausible though obviously no one really knows what the experience would be like.

The film then, should not be taken as a documentary on the holocaust (there are plenty of those around with far more realistic (and gruesome) pictures). But it is a journey into fantasy and will doubtless please the school of thought that maintains that one's heritage is all-important to be able to appreciate one's life today.

The fact that in 2005 we are commemorating the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the camps of death may have something to to with this film suddenly being issued on DVD in a certain number of countries.
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
sincere but lacks real drama
SnoopyStyle16 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Hannah Stern (Kirsten Dunst) is a modern teen without much care for her Jewish ancestry. She's not that interested in the family Passover seder. Her aunt Eva (Louise Fletcher) knows that she could never understand. She goes back in time to 1941 Poland. She wakes up as Chaya who has been ill. She had traveled to attend her uncle's wedding. Her cousin Rivkah (Brittany Murphy) has been taking care of her. On the wedding day, the Nazis arrive to take everybody away. They struggle and work to build the prison camp. Ultimately Chaya takes Rivkah's place to the gas chamber. She wakes up to understand that Rivkah is her aunt Eva.

The Holocaust has been done in many ways. I certainly understand the sincerity of this attempt. It's trying to connect young people with the past. I don't think this is done with well enough. Kirsten Dunst is a solid young actress but she doesn't have enough innocence. She should be shocked and bewildered. Also there is nothing new in the concentration camp. This is not a bad attempt. The idea has potential. Louise Fletcher is great but this doesn't quite make it.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Peggy Sue Got Married meets the Holocaust
alicespiral19 June 2008
An unusual take on the story of the Holocaust though rather pointless.Same as the title-what is the Devils arithmetic? The film will teach you nothing about the Holocaust. As a time travel story it works to an extent in that it concludes by bringing the girl back to her own time as if its all been a dream. Obviously its full of artistic license-the Germans all speak English and it roughly follows what we already know about the ghettoes which were to lead to the camps. I don't think anyone could be unaware of what happened in Germany in the 40s but comparing this to the various documentaries on individual POW camps or classic movies like Schindlers List and its hardly in the same class. As a time travel movie its like Back to the Future or Peggy Sue got married without the music.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dunst and Murphy provide moving performance
buffelina2221 July 2000
Although I have not had the opportunity to read the novel, I felt that this film, despite its low-budget status, is well done, engaging and unequivocally moving.

The surprising highlight of the film is the portrayal of Hannah and Rivkah by Kirsten Dunst and Brittany Murphy. Dunst and Murphy bring an inner-strength to the protagonists leaving the viewer speechless as she/he inexorably contemplates the value of life, friendship and courage in the face of evil and physical/spiritual death.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Remember Always – Another Movie About Jews in Concentration Camp
claudio_carvalho17 April 2005
The Jewish Hannah Stern (Kirsten Dunst) does not pay much attention to Jewish traditions. In a celebration in the house of her aunt Eva (Louise Fletcher), Hannah drinks too much wine and passes out. When she wakes up, she traveled in time and arrives in the house of a Jewish family in Polland in the Eve of the German invasion. She becomes friend of Rivkah (Brittany Murphy) and they are sent to a concentration camp, where Hannah lives the horror of the Holocaust. Having the names of Kirsten Dunst and Brittany Murphy in the credits, I really expected that "The Devil's Arithmetic" was a good movie. However, the theme of the Holocaust is so explored in Hollywood, that the unique originality in this film is the mix with time travel without any explanation. In the end, it is corny and shallow as a drama of war, and it is not a good fantasy film. It seems that the main intention of "The Devil's Arithmetic" is to remember always the atrocities of the Holocaust, as said by aunt Eva to Hannah. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Matemática do Diabo" ("Devil's Mathematic")
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good for junior high kids
maraudertheslashnymph12 February 2010
In light of Brittany Murphy's recent and tragic death, I decided to watch some of her movies I'd never seen and I found this one. "The Devil's Arithmetic" is the kind of movie that would be good for middle-schoolers who don't know much about the Holocaust. It doesn't dumb down the atrocities of a concentration camp, but it doesn't focus on depicting them in graphic detail, either. While there are several deaths, many happen off-screen, and those we do see are bloodless but blood-chilling.

Fans of the book, which I read several times in middle school and early high school, will probably be disappointed; there's no Gitl, Rivka is Hannah's cousin, and some of the more suspenseful episodes of the novel are gone. However, if you've never read the book or can set the book aside, the film has an interesting story and does a good job of establishing a culture that will be unfamiliar to the viewer. Brittany Murphy is probably the best thing about this movie, and I don't say that out of pity; she plays Rivka as a sweet, kind, devoutly religious young woman who is the movie's emotional backbone. Kirsten Dunst is, well, Kirsten Dunst. She isn't bad in the part, but she doesn't make herself terribly memorable in it, either.

Older audiences might think "The Devil's Arithmetic" sanitizes the Holocaust, but I'd have to disagree. It doesn't whitewash what happened - it just presents it in a way that won't cause twelve-year-olds to have vivid, gory nightmares. If the film has a large flaw, it's that Hannah never develops much of a personality beyond a bratty kid who has to adjust to life in the camp. That was the flaw of the book too, I think. At the same time, that blankness allows viewers Hannah's age to imagine themselves as Hannah and react and learn as she does.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worth watching but keep in mind "The Devil's Arithmetic" is for a young audience
clivy17 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
After reading the reviews here I wanted to add my thoughts. I stumbled across "The Devil's Arithmetic" while watching the True Movie channel her in the UK. I haven't heard of the book, but when I heard the description of the film I thought it would be worth watching, especially for I thought, Kristen Dunst and Brittany Murphy.

The viewer has to keep a few things in mind. First, the movie is clearly intended for a young audience. I can see that Hannah and Rivka were younger in the book than they are in the movie: about 11, one reviewer said. They do seem younger than teenagers but I thought that was to appeal more to younger viewers. Also, the ties to "The Wizard of Oz" are clearer and stronger if Hannah and Rivka were meant to be the same age as Dorothy.

Second, I was also annoyed by the Polish characters' bad accent and the commander's clipped movie German accent (It turns out that the actor who plays the commander is British). American movies usually get around the problem of characters supposedly speaking different languages by having the characters speak with heavy accents. I accepted that Rivka was speaking Polish (or Yiddish) while the commander was speaking German. We see the events through Hannah's eyes and so we hear accented English.

Third, I didn't find the historical accuracy of the film unbelievable. I was annoyed by the early scenes after Hannah wakes up in Poland. Rifka tells Hannah (and the audience) that she is in Poland in 1941. So, I thought, the village must be in eastern Poland. Most of the Jews in Poland under German occupation in 1941 were living in ghettos enforced by the Nazis. However, eastern Poland was under Russian jurisdiction. Surely the villagers would recognise the Nazis immediately – but it's Hannah who announces to the audience that the Nazis are invading the village; the Rabbi recognises the danger immediately and encourages the groom to break the wedding glass quickly. The Nazis killed numerous Jewish communities in the East in 1941 by shooting them. However, during this period they began to test other forms of eliminating Jewish populations. The camp that Rifka's community was sent to wasn't named in the movie. It was small and seemed newly built. I thought that Hannah, Rifka and the other prisoners were being put to work to expand the camp, to build more barracks and more crematoria. Gassing of prisoners began in 1941 and so its probable that the camp crematorium and gassing chamber were built and being used while Rifka and Hannah are prisoners, especially if Hannah is sent to the crematorium after Passover- this would mean spring of the following year, 1942. The only thing I found hard to believe was how Rifka survived in the camp until after the war ended, particularly if she was ill before Hannah was selected for execution. If she was already ill how could she survive for another three years? But this is left to the audience to surmise: it could be she escaped from the camp, or was transferred somewhere else, or was assigned less physically demanding work such as sorting clothes.

I was still annoyed by Hannah waking up with all her family around her – in black and white yet. Like one reviewer said, I was waiting for Toto to jump into her arms. Comparing Dorothy's adventure in Oz to the horrors of the Holocaust is slight, but the scene that follows with Hannah telling Aunt Eva she now clearly sees the importance of her heritage is very moving. Kristen Dunst portrays well how Hannah reacts and adapts to monstrous circumstances and Brittany Murphy is convincing and heartbreaking as Rifka, despite her clichéd accent. "The Devil's Arithmetic" moved me although I'm an adult who has seen many films and read many books about the Holocaust. While it is clearly intended for a young audience, it is an engrossing movie for all ages.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nazi summer camp for kids
sugarjunkmail28 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I understand this movie is an intro to the holocaust for Jewish teens but it is honesty so watered down that it feels like your watching a bad summer camp movie. Everyone in here acts as though they are slightly inconvenienced by the Nazi's detaining and murdering them. There is no emotional impact in this movie as this makes the holocaust look tame. The most emotional scene is when poor little Kristen Dunst gets her hair cut boo ho. I loved how all the prisoners looked clean and like they had makeup on, they want to look good for the Nazi's. The hanging scene was so unemotional it felt fake. I would think if you watched your family get killed like that you would lose your freaking mind not mildly sob like your boyfriend broke up with you. There was no emotional agony from families being torn apart, it's like they accepted their fate without going through any of the coping stages. It would be like if they made a movie where a woman is diagnosed with terminal cancer and has a month to live and she brushes it off with no emotional response and went on with her daily life. If you wanted teens to come back from this movie changed you're deluding yourself. Teens see more graphic violence on TV and video games, I think they could handle the gruesome accounts from the holocaust. Hell, it would be better to expose then to the horrors of the holocaust before they become so numb to violence that it wouldn't effect them at all. Christian parents dragged their little brats to watch Passion of The Christ, the worst snuff film in history, I think Jewish kids could handle Schindler's List.

The second thing I hated about this movie was it's blatant moral motive. This move is meant to guilt trip Jewish kids into accepting their religious heritage. I have never believed in the idea that scaring and forcing children into faith is an ethical or effective means to conserve religion. There are more effective and loving ways to teach faith. This movie feels like the Christian equivalent of telling a child they will burn in eternal pain if they don't believe and live by religious dogma. Children should be free to decide for themselves and a loving family would support them.

The ending was so bland and unemotional. They stripped the women down, magically no nudity, forced them into a small room and dropped blue cat litter from the ceiling and then suddenly everyone died instantly with no suffering. The way the nude girls fell to the ground as the camera pulled away and faded out looked like a cheesy album cover, again they managed to magically show no nudity. Everything about this movie failed. It made me laugh and you should never laugh about something so horrible.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This movie finds a way to tell about a tragedy to young generation
CDavisConvTTU20 February 2006
I believe that this movie was well acted as well as well thought out. The Question really is;"How do I tell young people about this terrible tragedy without being to graphic and still holding their attention. I think that the movie answered that question admirably. Kirsten Dunst is a great actress that showed her ability to tell a serious story with a sense of lightheartedness. Let's not forgot Brittany Murphy. She is a highly underrated actress who just barely broke the surface of what she can do in this movie. overall, if your looking to tell/show a group of preteen/teens the story of the holocaust without the brutality then this is the ONLY movie to show them.
20 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I like it but...
little_miss_dolphin825 September 2008
This film has some credibility. I like the idea behind it but I have trouble with the slight cheesiness that comes across sometimes. Some of it is a bit cliché and I don't find Kirsten Dunst to be all that convincing, especially when she first arrives in Germany. I found the transition from present to past to be cheesy too. I love the idea but it just didn't do all that much for me. The history is awesome but I think things could've been better achieved if it was the grandmother's story, and not the girl time travelling because it brings down the realism and credibility of the storyline, and surely they are trying to get realism across?
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
We're off to see the death camps...
Pretty_houstongirl777 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
While understanding that this was a low budget production, it suffers in many ways by being too sanitized and almost absurdly fantastical. Kirsten Dunst was a serious mis-casting for this film. Her performance seemed forced and amateurish, as if she was reading lines for a freshman production of the holocaust for a high school theatre troop.

She approaches the role with less authenticity than Judy Garland finding herself somewhere over the rainbow.

Most of the performances in this film were either bland and lifeless or overplayed which gives this film a lack of any emotional balance and makes it difficult to truly feel or appreciate the actual horrors of the subject matter.

The best thing about this film is Brittany Murphy. In the scene where her mother is taken to be murdered by the Nazis her raw and agonizing grief is so authentic you finally truly feel the soul shattering experience of what living through this was like.

Overall this movie suffers from poor script writing, an emotionally devoid and dated score, and a longwinded, lumbering pace that fails to build any connection with the people or their suffering.

If you're okay with the excessively cheesy Hallmark or Lifetime made for TV melodramas of the late 80's early 90's then this film will probably appeal to you. If not, you'll probably want to give this one a pass.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I'm quite amazed at the negative comments I see here
rcs814 March 2005
The point of this film was not as much to be "great art" as it was to educate people about the Holocaust. In that sense, I think that many posters here are unfairly blasting it, holding it up to some high artistic standard. Believe it or not, there are many in this world, especially younger people, who have not clue one about the atrocities committed against the Jewish people. This film would be an excellent introduction (along with other films such as Diary of Anne Frank) for young people into this very real and recent historical nightmare. To read comments here about how bad the German accents were and how the Germans deserve better than this, lead me to suspect the sincerity of those posting them.
28 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
mixed nuts
davea05117 February 2012
First of all, remember this is a low-budget made-for-TV show that crams way too much stuff into too little time, suitable for viewing for just about any audience, dealing with the most difficult and harrowing subject matter of the past 100 years through the eyes of a shallow self-centered post-Reagan brat by some cosmic wrinkle in order to set her straight. When you consider all that it's not all that bad and probably a fairly good way to introduce younger children to the subject matter without giving them the nightmares like Schindler's List might do. The weakest performance is that of Kristin Dunst who at times (perhaps more often than not) seems like she's on prozac, and if you can get over that and the simplistic stereotypes then give it a shot. I only wish they had cast someone for the main character who tried harder to connect with her character when she experienced devastating things like being ripped away from her family by time instead of seeming mildly put out - but then part of that was also bad writing due partly I'm sure to time and budget constraints.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Idea is good, but it is not enough...
tuor-117 March 2009
I just have watched this film and I must say: "I didn't like it". OK, the idea behind it is good, but that is not enough. The film hardly shows nightmare of the camps. I was in Auschwitz, in Majdanek, in Treblinka. For me it seems like director have never seen any of them and only heard about.

The film also simplifies everything. There is no background. We know nothing about situation. Someone told before that during WW2 6 million Jews died. Yes, that is true, but during this war also 6 million Poles died... And what is important: half of the killed Jews were Poles (which means that half of the killed Poles were Jews). I personally know people who survived war in Poland. In their tales almost nothing is black or white. Everything is gray... Sometimes Jews killed Jews while Poles, risking their lives, helped Jews. But sometimes Poles killed Jews while German officers helped Jews. These were dark times and this film doesn't show the tragedy of the second world war or the Holocaust.

The film hasn't moved me. I was not far from turning my computer off before the end of the film. I think that we can't understand what it was like in the camps. I believe though, that film (as part of mass-media) has tools to show everyone that it was so terrible, that it's not understandable for us. This film didn't make use of this tools.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
surprisingly good
jep83120 December 2003
I think the movie is even better than the book, and the book is excellent. The movie changed Hannah and Rivkeh to be in their mid-teens rather than only about 11 as in the "Young Adult" novel. This might have been done for an "inside-the-box" reason, namely so that the director could work with more mature performers. But whatever the reason, the change was for the better, as it made the story more realistic to me -- I can "buy" that 16-year-olds could survive without parents in a concentration camp, but not 11-year-olds!

I expected a good performance from Kirsten Dunst, who is known for serious work. But the one who was a revelation was Brittany Murphy, more associated with (mediocre) light comedy (such as "Summer Catch" and "Just Married"). With dark hair, dark eyes and a believable Polish accent, she utterly disappears into the role of Rivkeh.

To answer a question posed by a previous poster, about why the great-aunt changed her name ... one reason, not obvious to the casual viewer, comes out of Jewish tradition. It is an old custom for a Jew, after having narrowly escaped death, to take a completely different first name. The (somewhat superstitious) belief is that you are trying to fool the Angel of Death; if you have a different name now, he won't realize it's you and therefore won't try to take you again! The other two reasons are more obvious: She was honoring her friend who sacrificed her life for her, and she was beginning a new life in America (many Jews and others took new names when they immigrated).
31 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gives teens some perspective
HotToastyRag20 March 2024
Kirsten Dunst starts The Devil's Arithmetic in the same way she might start any 1999 movie: she's a self-absorbed teenager who doesn't care about history or her elders. She's in a tattoo parlor watching her friends mar their bodies and trying to pick out a meaningless design for herself. She doesn't, though, because she checks her watch and realizes she's late for Passover dinner. She rolls her eyes through the entire evening; she just doesn't care about her Jewish heritage. As she walks down the hallway, she gets transported to another time and place: Poland in 1941.

Just when Kirsten starts believing her new surroundings aren't a dream, Nazi soldiers enter the village and imprison everyone - including Kirsten and her cousin, Brittany Murphy. Men and women are separated, their heads are shaved, and they're given what Kirsten so frivolously thought was cool at the start of the movie - tattoos. Sufficed to say, she learns a lot of lessons about what's important. This will be a pretty heavy movie for the teen audience, but I would recommend it if you want to see Kirsten's acting chops (you can also check out Fifteen & Pregnant) or if you want some perspective. Produced by Dustin Hoffman and featuring Louise Fletcher, The Devil's Arithmetic shows that the world seems to revolve around you when you're sixteen, but everything can change in the blink of an eye.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Anachronistic
Fine enough I guess but it really pulled me out of it when these people in WWII hadn't heard of Wizard of Oz. The book was very famous and had already been out four decades by then. Not to mention the very famous movie that had also been out a few years at that point. The characters even make a point to mention earlier in the film that they enjoy going to the movies. I find it behind credibility that none of them had even heard of this story.

Beyond that, this movie was fine. Not great acting. Simplistic storyline. I think for kids it'd probably be a pretty good first introduction to the Holocaust. I was kinda bored though. Didn't feel super connected to the characters. It gave me tv movie vibes, which maybe it was. Not a terrible movie though. It's probably worth watching if you haven't already seen it.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great acting; ehh script
adamkraemerla29 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I'm sorry; if I were suddenly finding myself from any time post-WWII, the first thing I would do is try to convince ANYONE I'm from the future. This isn't actually that difficult to do. Even if that weren't an option, knowing that the Nazis murdered more than 6 million Jewish people in Europe, I would MAYBE try to find out the year. And then try to figure out how I'm speaking a language I don't know.

I think Brittany Murphy (rip) and Kirsten Dunst do a very good job. But the first half hour is just ... silly.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not very well made. There are better movies about the Holocaust.
deloudelouvain16 December 2020
The Devil's Arithmetic is clearly made for television. It just lacks quality to be shown in a movie theater. Kirsten Dunst is still young in this movie and it shows, it's not the same quality of acting that we know her for nowadays. Whatever other positive reviewers say about her for this movie it's just not there. The rest of the cast are also just average at best. The story doesn't make much sense, it's rather dumb than smart. The Polish Jews talking in a bad forced English was also stupid, just speak Polish or Hebrew, or just speak correct English, any other attempt of a language is just irritating to listen to. As well with the Germans and their fake accent, it's annoying. The plot is basically learning about the Jewish traditions, which are by the way dumb, like any other religious tradions. As for the Holocaust scenes the actors lookd pretty well fed, besides their bad haircut they absolutely don't look like Holocaust victims, so here again they missed the whole point. The Devil's Arithmetic is a boring movie about a sensible subject.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Emotionally Powerful and Excellent Education
Corky215 January 2006
While obviously this isn't a perfect education of the horrors of the Holocaust, it's not meant to be. This movie was based on a Young Adults' book, and it's transformed into a Young Adults' movie. It's not supposed to be a perfectly accurate portrayal, and it's not meant for historians or anything. But it is a touching film and excellent education for people to understand what it was like then. There are many powerful moments in the movie. A particularly impressive part, to me, was when Kirsten Dunst's character points to the number branded on her arm, and cries, "I wanted one of these!" referring to a tattoo. I think the highlight, however, was Brittany Murphy's incredible part. She was virtually unrecognizable, and her acting was superb. She literally threw herself into the part, and she shines. She truly is one of the greatest things about this movie.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Our Class Review (2nd and 6th hour)
ashley-thorpe25 January 2013
(Second Hour's Review) "The Devil's Arithmetic" is heart-racing, historical fiction, stomach churning, and completely sorrowful movie. The movie, released in 1999, stars Kirsten Dunst as Hannah. Who is portrayed as a modern, city-girl who doesn't want to learn about her cultural history until she is forced. Director Donna Deitch does a phenomenal job exploring the plot in an emotional way. Hannah's experience starts by being taken from her Aunt Eva's, played by Louise Fletcher, Seder dinner and transferred back to the beginning of the Holocaust. Along the way she meets Rivkah, played by Brittany Murphy, and many others that help her get back home. For historical fiction, the "Devil's Arithmetic" was wonderful! I would give this film 4 out of 5 stars. I thought that the "Devil's Arithmetic" portrayed the Holocaust very well and very emotionally. The actors chosen for the film did a phenomenal job portraying the characters. The setting was realistic and very detailed. This movie is great at teaching young kids that family and remembering history and your culture is important. I believe that teens and young adults will be able to relate to Hannah's character and her journey. (6th Hour's Review) The holocaust was dreadful, filled with pain and anguish. Jane Yolen is a Jewish author that brought us a thrilling yet sad story, The Devil's Arithmetic, of an ordinary girl remembering the past. Since many of us are way too lazy to sit down and read a book the director took the liberty of making a movie of this fascinating novel.Directed by Donna Deitch, this 1999 filn stars Kirsten Dunst as Hannah Stern, Brittany Murphy as Rivkah, and Louise Fletcher as Aunt Eva. The documentary-like drama follows Hannah Stern, an American teenager who would much rather hang out with her friends then go to her family's Seder dinner, during Passover. She reluctantly comes home late and the family goes to their Aunt Eva's for the celebration. Hannah participates, but is very hesitant to be included in the family's customs. After the traditional dinner and wine drinking, she is chosen to open the door for the prophet Elijah and is transported into another world where she relives the Holocaust as a young Jewish girl in Poland. It is at this time her cousin Rivkah is introduced into the plot and the two experience the horrors of a Nazi concentration camp together. This film was exceptional on many levels. The casting was fantastic! Kristen Dunst and Brittany Murphy really portrayed the characters well. Giving this movie a solid 8 stars, I would recommend that you see it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This has gotta be the dumbest move about the holocaust ever made
soldaten11613 January 2005
Unbelievably bad acting. This is an overly sentimental piece of drivel that was made purely to cash in on a traditionally easy theme to make money on. The Holocaust/WWII. Using the time travel thing just made it even cornier. That was done as far back as the Twilight Zone in the 60's. There were zero original ideas in this movie and many blatant scene copies of better movies. It's painfully obvious the makers neither cared about the history or the people that survived and basically slapped them and Germany in the face with this poor recreation.

Personally I found it insulting to watch and soon after they arrived at the death camp I had to turn it off. The bad uniforms and pathetically poor German accents were painful. Kirsten Dunce's overacting was embarrassing.

The Jewish league should sue for being shamelessly exploited in a bad TV movie and get whatever profits came from this movie, then give anyone who voted higher than a 2 for this movie a free trip to the Holocaust Memorial in Washington DC, Auschwitz, the Wiesenthal Center or the Imperial War museum. The German government should sue and get whatever money it can from the producers for beating this dead horse long after it's expired. The German government and people deserve better than this. If you are going to drag them through the mud again at least have the decency to do it right. I mean seriously, there are much better and more accurate movies out there. Why did they even make this?? Most of the others have been edited and shown on television so it can't be that there was a need to get a movie out to that audience. I wouldn't want my kids to see this version because it dumbs the whole tragedy down so much they won't understand the brutality and scope of the holocaust from this. To me it just looked fake. At one point I even found myself thinking that it didn't look like they had it that bad. I found myself laughing at the stereotypes, bad script and poor editing. Let's not even discuss the cinematography. My kid could do better with a Sony hand-held. I am thinking the budget on this move must have been dismally low.

If you're too young to understand the violence of the event then wait till you're older. If you think that dumbing down the holocaust just to get the message out on TV is acceptable, you're selling yourself and mankind in general short. Giving this movie a high mark just because its about the holocaust is like giving George Bush an A for effort in Iraq. You should just watch the history channel if you want to know more about this and are too lazy to open a book.
15 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Touching, Sad, Sweet, Powerful
missygoldstein1 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
We all heard of the Holocaust. We all know about the evil Nazis and the atrocities that happened during that horrible time, but none of us were there. It's hard to imagine what it was like and what those people went through.

This is the story of a modern girl in a Jewish family. She is not interested in hearing the stories of her relatives who survived the concentration camps because the idea is so foreign to her it's almost laughable.She reluctantly attends a passover seder with her parents where her aunts and uncles talk about "the camps" and she just dismisses the conversation. When she goes to put out the ceremonial cup of wine for Elijah, the profit she is transported in time to a village in Poland (I think it was poland). Everyone recognizes her as Hannah (her ancestor she was named after). She wakes up in a surreal "wizard of Oz like" setting where she is awaken after an apparent illness. Her "cousin" Rifka (played so sweetly by Brittany Murphy)tries to help her jar her "memory" of being her "cousin from Lublin" who is visiting". They walk through their quaint village as everyone is preparing for a wedding. Hannah is confused, but seems to just go with her new reality without too much question.

After the wedding is over several cars pull up to the village with Nazis with guns and trucks to transport the Jews to the camps. The people are scared and confused, but Hannah is the most terrified as she has the terrible forsight of what is about to happen.

She tries to figure out what is going on, whether she is dreaming, hallucinating, or what, but eventually realizes she is now a Jew in a concentration camp during world war 2 like it or not and she has to let fate play out.

This movie is powerful. To see the holocaust from the perspective of someone who already knows what has happened is chilling. From the time they arrive at the camp and are stripped of their clothes, dignity, money, possessions, have their hair shaved, are forced into slave labor and eventually murdered. Obviously the girl (hannah's) life would be changed forever if she ever woke up from the nightmare.

Great film.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent, intriguing film using time-travel device to inform about the holocaust!
talisencrw8 August 2016
Previously I had really enjoyed Donna Deitch's earlier lesbian romance period piece, 'Desert Hearts', and I had found Kirsten Dunst and Brittany Murphy amazing in 'Melancholia' and 'Sin City' respectively, but a TV-movie utilizing time-travel as a plot device for a spoiled Jewish teenager to come to grips with her heritage seemed quite a bold and intriguing cinematic experiment, not to mention being an entirely different can of worms than ever I've been privy to watching. Even though personally I have as little to do with Jewish customs as lesbian issues, like Deitch's earlier work, I was able to appreciate it, though I still prefer her earlier film, if I was held at gunpoint and had to rank the two.

It's a crying shame, looking at Deitch's IMDb page, that this talented San Francisco native, now 71, has been relegated to basically doing TV episodes since this came out.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Holocaust For Dummies or: How I Learned to Pay Attention and Care About the Prosecution of Jews
TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews19 September 2004
This film is *very* basic stuff; the dream/time-travel theme, the typical war-drama clichés, etc. The whole film is just so bland and and the way it handles the serious subject... I don't know, it's just like a... Schindler's List Light; you get the important subject and a few well-known actors, but without any shred of anything else worth watching a movie for. The plot is lame, just a rehash of the dream/time-travel formula, in which the main character travels through time because he/she must learn an important lesson(like, say, Christmas is important, caring is important, and in this one, the Holocaust was and is important; bear in mind, I'm not saying it's untrue... I'm merely saying that it's an overly tongue in cheek way of telling us that), and wanders about, constantly talking about things that don't exist in that time period, instead of wising up and keeping her mouth shut; how many of these movies have been made, anyway? They should have stopped making them back in whatever decade they started. It's too bad the important subject has to be dumbed down to a childish "adventure" just to make teens and kids aware of what went on during the Holocaust(which the film arguably does a somewhat half-bad job of, since it's made into a PG-movie). Come on, I'd have rather sat through an informational but dull retelling of the story, instead of sitting through this tripe. The plot is tame and cliché-ridden, badly paced and not very interesting. Once again, too bad for a film with such an important a subject. The acting is decent at best; not surprising for a TV-movie cast, but come on... Brittany Murphy and Kirsten Dunst can do better than this. They may not be the best teen actresses out there, but they're better than this. The characters are mostly clichés and stereotypes. The cinematography is unimaginative. One of the biggest problems apart from everything I've written up to this point was that it focused very much on the Jewish religion and their customs, which seem strange and ridiculous, at least to me. That made them all the more unappealing to me, along with their one-dimensional personalities and poorly written and even more poorly delivered dialog. But, maybe I'm just too anti-religious and atheistic. Meh. My point is; you don't really care about these people, since their personalities are paper-thin and you know from the very moment they are introduced exactly what is going to happen to them, at least if you have any experience with the genre. Basically, the movie has a good point, but it's poorly presented and too much of the film is just poorly executed and ends up making you smirk or even laugh at what you're supposed to start crying at. I recommend this movie only to kids and other easily impressible people. I suppose if you *must* see every movie about the Holocaust, this isn't the worst either. You could do a lot worse, but you certainly could do a hell of a lot better, too. 5/10
14 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed