Zombie 5: Killing Birds (1988) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
36 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Night of the Missing Script
GroovyDoom27 September 2000
Warning: Spoilers
"Killing Birds" is being belatedly marketed as a part of the vague "Zombie" series. It has nothing to do with any of them, but none of them have anything to do with any of the others, so that's OK. There *are* zombies in "Killing Birds", but that's not really what the movie is about. The plot itself may leave you a little confused. The first time I watched it I was lost, but eventually by reading up on the film I put the pieces together. The movie opens with a mostly unseen soldier who walks into a house and murders all of the inhabitants. If you didn't read about the film on the Internet, you might not know what the heck the murders have to do with anything, but to have the plot explained to you from an outside source helps (the movie itself is no good at communicating facts to the viewer): the soldier is returning home from Vietnam. He finds his wife in bed with another man, and apparently it's not much of a secret because a few other family members live there, too, and they're all home, including a baby. Oh, there are a lot of exotic birds around, too. The soldier kills all of the people, and even a few of the birds, except for the baby. As he's trying to clean up the bloody mess, the remaining birds attack him and peck out his eyes, which all birds in horror movies will instinctively do.

The point is, years later a group of students venture into the wilderness to study the rare "ivory-billed woodpecker". This will help them get an A in their classes, you see. They visit our now-blind soldier/murderer, who has aged into Robert Vaughan. It just so happens he's an expert on birds, and the kids hope he can help them find their woodpecker. After leaving him, they drive off into the Louisiana "swamp" and come upon the murder house, where they discover strange things and are eventually beset-upon by zombies. I'm not exactly sure why zombies, exactly. I suppose they are the reanimated corpses of the murder victims at the beginning of the film, and they are out for a little blood. Not that the college students make it difficult for them. They are the kind of horror-film characters who insist on splitting up when danger is present. They wander off alone to investigate strange lights, or to look for the car keys, or whatever paltry reason the script writer could come up with for them to be alone and defenseless.

I suppose this is all in the spirit of good horror movie fun, but I found it to be really boring and a test of patience. The characters behave like morons at all times, and do not respond to anything in any way that can be considered rational or even human. For instance, even before they get to the house they discover a corpse in an abandoned truck. Instead of turning back immediately, one of them says "That's what will happen to us if we don't KEEP MOVING!" Huh?

Then later, the first character to be killed by a zombie is murdered when she visits the cursed porch where the old bird cages are; another character sees her go up onto the porch, but refuses to react when she sees the girl screaming and knocking over the cages to get away from the zombie. After the zombie victim is already dead, then the girl goes and wakes up her companion: "I think something's wrong with Jennifer."

In my favorite example of non-human responses, two guys are trying to start a generator. One of them is wearing a long pendant, which gets pulled into the rusty machinery and drags his face slowly into the gears. For about two minutes, the other guy just stands there watching, wide-eyed, as the other one is mangled by the machine. Then he runs off to tell the others what happened.

On the plus side, the film is surprisingly well-lit (although it's almost nonsensical; rooms are lit blindingly bright when the power's supposed to be off). There's some nice cinematography. One interesting scene echoes the swinging light fixture at the conclusion of "Psycho", with the light intermittently illuminating an approaching zombie, and another involves the slow approach of zombies glimpsed through the windshield of a truck.

The film is obviously inspired by Fulci's "The Beyond", but the gore is really tame and there is very little suspense or atmosphere. Too much logic is sacrificed and very little is offered in its place. The soundtrack made me chuckle at first, then became rapidly annoying with the repeating Casio-keyboard synth lines and canned musical cues that went out of style in 1984. In one of the scenes, they rip off "Two Tribes" by Frankie Goes To Hollywood. Swear to God! The conclusion of the film is truly laughable, as if they ran out of money and just had to stop shooting.

It should also be noted that, although the zombie makeup is pretty good, everything else in the special effects department sucks. There's a hilarious slit-neck appliance that shows up four times. There's an outrageous scene where a picture is supposed to "black itself out", but they just put some scratches on the film. One of the characters has a "hi-tech" computer that looks like a modern-day laptop crossed with a Commodore 64, and some awful superimposed graphics to go along with the computer scenes. The acting ranges from amateurish to just plain awful; Robert Vaughn appears to be half asleep, which is how you'll feel watching "Killing Birds". In the end, the biggest killing has been the hour and a half it took to watch the thing. Of interest to genre purists only, and even then, you probably won't want to watch this more than once.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Corrections
adamclark-017678 August 2020
A lot of reviews criticize this movie and claim the zombies are only in the last few minutes. I just want to correct that and confirm that there are zombies through out the last half of the movie.

The rest of the reviews about the bad acting and loss of plot are pretty spot on.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Disregard the plot line given here, this is not really much of a zombie flick.
Aaron137527 March 2005
First of all this movie is not really Zombie 5 as someone pointed out Zombie 4 After Death came out a year later. Rather, both movies are just being repackaged and given new names simply to make some connection to Fulcio's Zombi 2. The only thing they have in common is that the dead do rise. I liked After Death a little, I thought it was a nice little zombie flick, nothing super great, but worth a look. This one, however, was really kind of tedious. Started promisingly enough with a man going on a killing spree after he finds his wife in bed with another man, but then it almost turns into a teen flick as we are introduced to the rest of the cast. The music even makes it seem like a teen comedy. Oh, and though it really is not clear at all there has been a significant number of years that has passed since the killings. Well we meet our young group of bird watchers and one annoying bus driver and a rather unremarkable reporter and all you can think is I hope they all die in extremely horrible ways. Not a good way to establish your characters in a horror movie is it? I mean when they aren't arguing over stupid stuff they are mumbling their lines so badly they sound like the parents in a Charlie Brown cartoon. Well they set off to find a bird which has not been seen in 20 or so years, and they run across a blind bird watcher. You'll know who he is and you will know what one of the gang of teens is right away so there is no real surprise at the revelation at the end. Well after they bother the blind guy they proceed to go bird watching get lost in the woods and find a house. They immediately set up camp here, despite the fact there vehicle is like just over the hill and if they would have continued searching for another 5 minutes they could have gotten out without anything happening. But hey, its a horror movie. Well finally some stuff starts to happen as people begin to die while their friends just stand there watching the person die. Of course they don't offer to help just standing there like idiots and then reacting well after the fact when it is far to late. My favorite being the guy who gets caught in a generator gear and gets ground up while this moron stands there not offering to help, then after the guy has had it he runs up stairs and says "they got him". I had to say, no they didn't the jerk got caught and you kind of let him die. As for the zombies they aren't in this movie much and they don't make much of an impression. The plot is practically nonexistent as there is no explanation for why any of it is happening besides the blind man's explanation at the end. Then you expect a rather grisly conclusion, but it never materializes and it just ends. Not a real zombie movie I say the makers were trying to make a movie more in the vain of "The Beyond". Of course that movie looks better, sounds better, and has better kills so there is no comparison there. I don't know maybe this was two movies that got bumped together. One film crew was making a horror movie, the other a teen romance, but they ran into each other and the teen romance people thought, a horror movie cool. That would explain the strange changes in the music in the first thirty minutes or so.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Complete waste of time
Coventry13 December 2004
Terribly bad acting is what annoys you here right from the start. The acting, along with the soap opera-like music, completely ruins the film before it even properly begins. I don't know by what standards the teenage protagonists were cast but they're NOT attractive and they sure don't succeed in making themselves appear believable. Killing Birds suffers a little too much from awful sound editing and low budget production values to make it worth renting. Luckily it got released as an unofficial sequel in the Zombie-series otherwise it was doomed to disappear into oblivion right after its premiere. At least now it enjoys a modest cult-reputation. Completely undeserved, because any other Zombie film contains more gore in the opening minutes than this production features throughout the whole playtime. The plot may have had some potential (the great Alfred Hitchcock already knew birds had something eerie forty years ago) but you're simply not interested due to the annoying characters and the tensionless surrounding. One to avoid at all costs.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Stupid, Gore and Messy Collection of Clichés
claudio_carvalho8 March 2009
In Louisiana, a soldier returning from Vietnam finds his wife in bed with her lover and he kills him, her and a couple of friends, but he is attacked by a bird and he loses his eyes. Years later, the bodies have not been found and the former soldier is the specialist in birds Dr. Fred Brown (Robert Vaughn), living in a house nearby the swamp. When a group of college students is assigned for a research of a woodpecker near extinction, they head to Dr. Brown's house to get some tips of how to find the rare bird. Then they drive through the swamp where they find the house where the murders happen and they decide to stay there. During the night, weird things happen and they are attacked by the victims of Dr. Brown.

"Zombie 5 – Killing Birds" is a stupid, gore and messy collection of clichés. The acting is terrible and histrionic; the screenplay is imbecile with mistakes in the continuity; the soundtrack is annoying and inappropriate for a horror movie; and the sets are very poor. Indeed it is an awful end of career of Robert Vaughn. My vote is three.

Title (Brazil): Not Available
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nauseating
cornjob-27 December 2000
This movie is possessed by an agonisingly slow pace, unlikable characters, and an annoying plot involving a bunch of college students looking for a rare species of cardinal in the Louisiana bayou. The film is ambitious, I'll give it that. The screen writers throw in a bunch of horror cliche c*** that goes nowhere (hero the son of...that guy, some "historical" stuff pertaining to murders, facts about birds), you know, the kind of stuff that's supposed to come together at the end to prove something.

The conclusion is especially terrible. It wraps up no loose ends and you are left wondering what the hell happened and why the hell the entire movie happened at all. It is a wholly unsatisfying experience with no redeeming qualities.

I fully recommend avoiding The Killing Birds.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
All build up, with no payoff.
dfolt14 September 2004
All build up, with no payoff. What was going through Robert Vaughn's head during shooting? The acting is so bad that the plot (??) is impossible to follow...most of the dialogue just sounds like random words. The gore (what little of it there is) is terrible. Nothing happens!! Somehow, Zombie 5 came out the year before Zombie 4...a minor point. Anyway, they both have the same structure...they both start with a ridiculously long flash back which ends with a child getting away. Then this child comes back when they are older...but they don't make that clear. Then they randomly introduce characters and kill them off. As for Killing Birds...I have no idea what birds had to do with anything...I'm sure Robert Vaughn explained it at some point. Not even worth laughing at!
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
And there I was, really wanting to like this and all, but...
Vomitron_G24 February 2011
Where the hell were the killing birds? There were birds, yes, but they didn't kill anybody! Argh! There is one zombie shuffling around in this film, though, killing off teenagers in some empty house. But don't ask me why or where that zombie came from, because once again, there's no explanation for any of the events whatsoever. So why on earth am I rating this fantastic film actually 3/10? Hmmm... Let me think. Well, the opening scene is pretty solid. It sets a certain dreary mood (and those teenagers haven't arrived yet at that point). Ehrr... It's got somewhat of an atmosphere to it, this movie, somehow. Uhm... What else? Huh... Oh, yes: It's Italian! There you go: That's 3 points. Yay!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The script is for the birds.
Hey_Sweden15 October 2017
Under developed, underwhelming addition to the Italian "Zombi" horror series tells another self- contained story; you don't need to see previous entries before seeing this one. The tale sees a Vietnam veteran return home to slaughter his loved ones, before the many hawks on their property attack him. Many years later, a bunch of dumb chump college students go in search of an elusive woodpecker species, and come upon this old abode, which is now a house of horrors.

Not much could be done to save this movie, not even a guest star role for 'Man from U.N.C.L.E." star Robert Vaughn, who plays a one-eyed old bird expert. The young cast is definitely attractive but otherwise nondescript. You don't really care for their characters, and don't mind seeing them knocked off. The script by Daniele Stroppa is one of those deals where it's short on sense, and long on nonsense. It doesn't bother giving you a lot of details or exposition, and actually waits until the dying minutes of the movie to pay off Vaughns' character. The plethora of feathered co-stars, however, never does amount to much. Also, while "Killing Birds" does feature zombies, there aren't that many of them. It isn't until around the one hour mark that this even becomes somewhat interesting / entertaining. The gore effects are quite grisly and enjoyable. The music score by Carlo Maria Cordio is also good.

Directing credit goes to Claudio Lattanzi. Joe D'Amato also directed & produced, without credit, and served as cinematographer under a pseudonym.

Five out of 10.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A film to fear
OnePlusOne4 May 2005
...but my only fear was that it would never end.

I love eurohorror, and I adore zombie time wasters like Tombs of The Blind Dead, La Notti Del Terrore and Lucio Fulci's zombie flicks. But this...this... I don't know how to write this so it won't end up one of those reviews where you end up wanting to watch the film just because the reviewer thought it was so enormously bad. But trust me. This one is bad-bad not entertaining-bad. Partly because it holds no hints of irony, and is technically well done enough not to end up cheesy. In the end it's simply mind numbingly dull.

I won't go into details on the story seeing as so many has already commented on it, suffice to say it's no understatement that it holds no immediate logic. And as far as zombies goes, they only appear in the last half an hour, which by the way seem to go on for ever and ever, due to the fact of unbelievable slow pacing. Also much of the time scenes repeat upon themselves, even the death scenes, but mostly the film grinds to a halt because the actors(if you can call them that) only stand around looking at each other or the surroundings for minutes and minutes on end. The only reason I sat through Zombie 5 - Killing Birds was because I was waiting for the zombie birds, which I naively enough thought would appear at least once. But even there I was disappointed.

I never thought I would say this, but you are better of re-watching Zombi 3. At least that one boasts some proper zombie birds and elementary gore.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Killing time - your time!
gridoon7 September 2002
Typical horror movie isolates a bland group of characters in a seemingly unoccupied villa (which they run across after getting lost in the course of a bird-watching expedition), then throws some zombies at them trying to spice things up, but unfortunately the gore is none-too-convincing. There are occasional moments of tension, but not enough to merit a rating higher than *1/2. Sorry.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
flies in the face of B-Horror convention, and occasionally delivers delirious excesses of Euro-cult insanity!
Weirdling_Wolf5 October 2023
While it would be entirely just to say 'Zombie 5: Killing Birds' fails to soar to the surrealistic heights of, Lucio Fulci's Grand Guignol masterpiece, 'Zombie', Claudio Lattanzi's idiosyncratic instalment, if enjoyed on on its own, not immodestly bizarre merits, presents itself as a luridly eccentric, if not universally adored Italian schlock-fest! A noisome van-load of collegiate ornithologists take a field trip to document the existence of a rare species of bird, but not only does said bird frustratingly remain elusive, these intrepid students are fatefully forced to spend a restless night in a seemingly deserted, monumentally eerie, far from hospitable house. Not long into their fitful kip when they must all violently repel all macabre manner of ghoulish apparitions in order to avoid their very own extinction!!!

Eschewing logic with admirable zeal, Lattanzi's batso-bonkers, eyeball poppingly grisly 'Zombie 5: Killing Birds' provides a sanguineous series of supernaturally strange close encounters with sinister looking crusty attack zombies, and gruesomely outlandish, ornithologically ominous horrors! The appealingly oddball, if not altogether subtle 'Zombie 5 Killing Birds' remains an inventive, frequently hallucinatory, scintillatingly splatter-slathered goofy B-Horror gem. Claudio Lattanzi's not always finely feathered fright-flick rewardingly flies in the face of B-Horror convention, and occasionally delivers delirious excesses of Euro-cult insanity! The underappreciated music maestro, Carlo Maria Cordio's provides yet another exemplary score!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More cheapo Euro fun
Bezenby21 August 2014
It's another late-era Italian horror film! For a change, this one involves a bunch of kids in a haunted house, a setting which definitely didn't appear in House of Clocks, House of Lost Souls, Witchery, Ghosthouse or House of Witchcraft. But hold your horses there mister, because this one also chucks in a slasher storyline (for a bit), and some zombies...eventually.

We start out in the late sixties, where a Vietnam vet returns home to find his missus in bed with another guy, so naturally our marine goes mental and kills the two of them, then another couple (in laws?) who are just arriving with a new born baby. The marine doesn't kill the baby, however, but when he returns to his home (which has an aviary outside), some eagles get loose and tear his eyes out. Any good Italian film should start with four murders and an eye removal.

We see the kid getting taken into care and then fast forward to 1987, where college student/bad actor Steve has just gotten the go-ahead to go and track down a rare bird called a grey-billed woodpecker, so he gathers together his crew of expendable youngsters, but not before Lara Wendel gets involved. She works for some college newspaper (I think), and has tracked down three people who have seen this bird. She's not dubbed in this one either.

Lo and behold, the only witness nearby is Bill Oddie! I mean, Robert Vaughan! And he's the blind psycho guy from the start of the film. We see Robert using two revox tape recorders to monitor various bird sounds and after an awkward conversation with Steve and Lara before a lengthy montage of our group of youngsters going around recording bird song in various locals which somehow reminded me of the Hafler Trio's field recordings. Man! I forgot to mention that one of our potential victims here is played by the "Muh Baybee?" girl from Witchery! Remember the Hoff trying to get into her pants in that film? Well, it seems that she got the part in that film based on her performance here. That's good stuff.

After finding a corpse in a jeep which the film doesn't bother explaining, our group end up at an old, dilapidated house, with an old aviary outside. This being an Italian film, the house is haunted, which leads to several scenes of the house messing with people's heads before the zombies finally appear, fifty-five minutes into the film.

So we've gone from slasher to haunted house and now zombie attacks, so that's all good as far as I'm concerned. This is when the cast start getting picked off too, as you'd imagine, with people having their heads caved in, throats ripped, getting burned and pulled through the roof via the attic just like in Anthropophagus. There's a couple of twists as usual (really far fetched ones, as usual) and although Robert Vaughn doesn't have much to do, his explanation for why anything was happening led to a good Italian head scratching ending.

Be warned: I probably like these films a lot more than anyone with a brain, but this is good bet if you're looking for a decent late era Italian horror full of lame fashion, prehistoric computers, a bit of gore and enough loose ends to something a something. I'm not sure of Joe D'Amato's involvement in this one, or how much of the film is his.

Man, reading the rest of the reviews, I might be the only person on Earth that enjoyed this.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What just... How... Why... What?!
This is the only movie I've ever come across that actually do not deserve more than one star, out of ten. But don't let that fool you, it's the worst star ever. it's completely unmotivated to speak for the quality of the film.

I have now viewed this film on several occasions, hoping to make some sense out of it. But no, I still do not know what my eyes has just seen.

It baffles me.

This movie is the film adaptation of the question mark. Upon viewing this, you will find yourself wondering; "Who would say that?!", "Why did you do that?!", "What did that have to do with anything?!", "Where are you?!", "How big is this house?!", "Where did that zombie come from?!", "Why did he just catch fire?!", "Why is it brighter than the sun if it's in the middle of the night?!", "where are all the birds?!".

Almost every scene and every piece of dialogue gives birth to a set of questions that will forever be without answers. No actions taken by the characters makes any kind of sense. No words spoken makes any kind of sense. I'm still not sure about the plot! What the hell is this movie about, why are they so dumb and why would they do the things they do? And where are all the murdering birds?!

I want to understand this movie, I really do. I've got so many questions! Where did the zombie/zombies (still not sure if there's actually more than one) come from? What did the intro "flashback" got to do with the rest of the film? Why are they just aimlessly running around in this house, committing random acts of stupidity? Where does all the smoke come from? And the lights?! The lights?! Oh God!

Who green lighted this?! Somebody along the production line must have noticed how bad it was?

Take this as a warning. I do not enjoy to bitch about movies, I am a huge fan of B-movies and euro trash and there's always SOMETHING good about a film. But I can't find anything that works here. The camera works, the audio, the plot, the acting, the effects... It's just not good. There is nothing good about it. I do not lie.

This film has a negative entertainment value. You loose previous fun you've had when you watch this. It leaves you with an empty feeling inside and enough questions to last you a life time.

...Why? :(
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A well done horror flick!
DJ Inferno17 April 2002
The story is about a Vietnam veteran who massacres his wife and her lover after catching them while having sex. Many years later a group of students travels to the forests to investigate a seldom kind of birds. To escape from the up coming fog they flee exactly in the lonely house where the terrible incidents did happen! Blood thirsty zombies appear and kill everyone until two members of the group. The last survivors find out about the dark secret of the house and the forest and its birds...

One of the less well-known works of Italian exploitation-specialist Joe D`Amato. Maybe not as sick as his masterpieces "Buio Omega" or "Emanuelle in America", but still pretty creepy and full of suspense. The film could be seen as a mixture of John Carpenter´s "The Fog" and Lucio Fulci´s "City of the living Dead" and it has some nice gore scenes like a guy who gets dismembered by a generator or a teared off head. The students only differ from their names and their clothes, but they are by far not as dumb as the teenagers in the "Friday the 13th" flicks, what´s no mistake in my opinion! Robert Vaughn as blind and mysterious scientist is the definitive highlight in this film! Highly recommended if you like creepy stuff with some gore! I´d give 7 out of 10!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A bird in hand is worth more then... this movie
movieman_kev12 March 2005
Robert Vaughn plays a Vietnam vet recently returning from the war only to find his wife in bed with another man. So he kills both of them and their friends before a bird takes his eye out. Flash forward two decades, and a group of students go off to study birds. Horrid acting, unsympathetic characters, lackluster plot, lack of action and insipid plot all combine to make this one to miss. Some day in the future when aliens visit Earth and see the landfills filled with films like this, "BASEketball", "Joe's Apartment", "Pootie Tang", "CHUD 2", and "Witch Academy", they'll get the wrong idea of Vaughn's worth as an actor.

My Grade: F

DVD Extras: Interview with Robert Vaughn; Picture Gallery; behind the scenes of "Flesh for the Beast" (yea, i have no clue why it's on this disc either); Theatrical Trailer; Trailers for "Flesh for the Beast", "Black Demons" and "Zombi 2"
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bottom of the barrel for Robert Vaughan
macabro3576 November 2003
(aka: ZOMBI 5)

Gawd, what a waste of time. Viet-Nam vet comes home and finds his wife sleeping with another man. He slits her throat, then he slits the guy's throat. Phony to say the least. He then throws a knife at another guy and it sticks into his forehead. Lame.

Then one of the caged birds on the porch gets loose and starts plucking the vets eyes out, blinding him. More phony. At least the dialog isn't overdubbed and they used mostly American unknowns, but it's terrible and amateurish and should have been scrapped altogether.

Cut some 20 years later and the vet (Robert Vaughan) invites some university students over to his property to study the wildlife and sleep over at the now-abandoned house for the night. But it's not really abandoned because some zombies are around and start killing the teenagers. "Where'd they come from....?" you ask... At least I did.

This is worse than Jeff Stryker in the Philippines (ZOMBI 4) or Bruno Mattei in Spain (HELL OF THE LIVING DEAD) so if you think those were the most awful zombie films out there, guess again...

On the short interview included with the Shriek DVD, Robert Vaughan says he can't remember too many details about the film (that's how 'memorable' it was) and instead talks a little bit about his family and career. What did that have to do with the film?

I guess to flesh out the interview. Another flop from the likes of Joe D'Amato.

2 out of 10



PS: This one's filmed in Louisiana so I guess that makes it a domestic, huh?
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Zombirds?
Zbigniew_Krycsiwiki30 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Review based on 87-minutes long French version, titled L'Attaque des Morts Vivants. Which, incidentally, was badly pixelated.

Some of the most ridiculously overbearing music imaginable accompanies a throat slashing in the first scene, as a Vietnam vet returns to find his wife in bed, asleep, with some other guy. When he first tries to stab wifey too, he accidentally stabs one of their pet birds first, then proceeds to kill his wife, as well as two others who stumble onto the scene. In retaliation for killing one of their number, the other pet birds go on the claw-full attack. (This opening scene is pretty good, it has a 1970s grindhouse feel to it, but subsequent scenes look something on cable television in the late '80s. Was that the filmmakers' intent?)

Twenty years later, college students sent to research the Irian Jayan tweel-crested boobyhatch, or birds of some other kind, stumble onto the same house the killings occurred, and eventually are attacked by the zombies of the murder victims.

Zombie variation of Hitchcock's The Birds isn't entirely successful, but has a bit of atmosphere, but not really much zombie action though, mainly just a lot of lurking point-of-view shots, filmed through a diffuser.

The house is creepy in some scenes, generic looking in others. Killer birds in the first scene, then haunted house clichés in the middle, then zombies at the end makes for odd changes in the tone of the film.

Had this movie been filmed about fifteen years earlier, it might have been much better. But as it is now, it seems like a made-for-cable-television rip off of zombie movies, and The Birds.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What a load of bird crap.
BA_Harrison22 September 2015
Good luck in trying to make sense of this one: it's a total mess, even by '80s Italian horror movie standards. The free-wheeling, nonsensical plot goes something like this:

Vietnam vet Fred Brown (Robert Vaughn) returns home to Louisiana to find his wife in bed with another man; after killing the adulterous couple, and his in-laws, Fred disposes of the bodies, cleans up the scene, and frees the family's pet birds, after which he is attacked by a hawk, which claws out his eyes.

Years later, the blind ex-soldier's crime somehow remains undiscovered, and he now spends his time at home studying bird song. Hoping to locate a rare species of woodpecker, a group of Louisiana college students pay the old man a visit, and, following his advice, they set out for the swamps. After stumbling across a decomposing body in a car (which they opt to ignore), they finally stumble upon the old, deserted house where Brown's murder spree took place and decide to spend the night, firing up a generator in the basement.

During the night, the friends experience a series of strange, inexplicable occurrences, including grisly hallucinations, after which they are attacked by several zombies and a supernatural force (which pulls one unfortunate victim into the gears of the generator). In the morning, the two remaining survivors escape the house, meeting Brown as they leave. The blind man enters the dilapidated property, where he is attacked by a flock of birds. The End.

None of this follows any kind of logic, there's no explanation for the supernatural goings on, the violence is bloody but unconvincing, and the ending incredibly weak. Although not an official part of the Zombie series, it's easy to see why Killing Birds was given the alternative title of Zombie 5: it's every bit as random, badly acted and shoddily directed as Zombie 3 and Zombie 4—unfortunately, it's also a lot more boring.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I can tell you what the chances are! None! We're F'd!
BandSAboutMovies8 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Fred Brown comes home from the Vietnam war, finds his wife in bed with a new lover, and goes wild, killing her and both of his parents. As he cleans off his knife, a falcon tears out his left eye and blinds him in the other before he says goodbye to the son he's spared. Also: it's the same house from The Beyond!

That's just the beginning of this film, a movie that I can't even begin to piece together. Most importantly, I question why Robert Vaughn would have signed on for it. Did he need money this badly?

But don't get me wrong. This is a 1980's Filmirage movie with controversy at the heart of who created it. That means that no matter what, I'm going to love it.

There are three different people who could have directed this movie.

Aristide Massaccesi, who you probably would know best as Joe D'Amoto. Most of the crew members believe that he was the director. In an interview in the book Spaghetti Nightmares, he said, "It seemed to me that the most sensible thing was to give the job of directing the dialogues to Michele Soavi's assistant, Claudio Lattanzi, while I took care of the special effects scenes. In the end, I let Lattanzi sign as the director." He was also the cinematographer of this movie under his alias Fred Sloniscko, Jr.

Claudio Lattanzi, who assisted Soavi on his documentary film Dario Argento's World of Horror and was an assistant on his film Stage Fright. D'Amoto, who also produced the latter, offered Lattanzi a chance to direct Killing Birds when Soavi turned down the film as he was about to make The Church with Argento.

The controversy doesn't stop there, as even who wrote this movie is under suspicion.

Over Christmas of 1986, Claudio Lattanzi wrote a story called Il Cancello Obsoleto about a record producer who invites a rock band to a deserted house to record a tune, without knowing that Nazi soldiers are buried there. This sounds like a combination of Sodoma's Ghost - which wouldn't come out until 1988 - and 1989's Paganini Horror.

D'Amoto asked him to replace the rock band and the Nazis with killer birds, wanting to call the movie Talons. However, Claudio Fragasso and Rossella Drudi claim that the movie was based on their script Artigli, which means...Talons.

The truth is probably that D'Amoto didn't want his name in too many places, so he just did what he always did - just about everything and either gave people credit or used one of his many names to cover the rest.

Anyways...

Twenty years later, a small group of college seniors, Steve Porter, Mary (Leslie Cumming, Witchery), Paul, Anne (Tara Wendel, who is also in Ghosthouse and Tenebre), Rob, Jennifer (Lin Gathright, who is also in D'Amoto's Eleven Days, Eleven Nights, Part 2) and a local cop, Brian, are looking for the green billed woodpecker, a rare species which went extinct four years after this movie.

Fred Brown, that man who went wild on his family, gives them plenty of info and they use his old home as a base, but find nthing but a rotting corpse. But then all sorts of even stranger things - odder than a corpse in a truck - happen.

That's when the kids start dying left and right, like a zombie beating Jennifer to death, Brian being burnt to death, Mary getting killed by a zombie, Rob getting choked by getting his necklace caught in a generator and another zombie getting Paul.

It turns out that Steve is Brown's son from all those years ago and the dad tells them that the zombies only killed those who were afraid of them. Well, yeah. They're zombies. Finally, he tells them to leave and we hear him scream. That's the end!

Charitably, this film is a mess yet I loved nearly every single frame of it. It's pointless and confusing and even its titles don't line up, because it's called Killing Birds-Zombi 5 in Italy and Zombie Flesheaters 4 in the UK.

God bless you, Joe D'Amoto.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
WELCOME HOME
nogodnomasters26 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Not much of a film. A group of students head into Louisiana territory to find the Ivory Bill Woodpecker before it is declared extinct. They meet up with a blind vet (Robert Vaughn) who had killed his wife and her lover, something that is not a crime in the South. He was blinded by birds. And that's about it as there are ghosts at the old house, visited by the group.

Was that a zombie an hour into the film? Film is a real stinker.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It reunites all the right elements to be a fun b-horror flick (but the title is misleading)
Milo-Jeeder13 September 2020
I cannot understand how this flick got such a low rating on IMDb. Despite of its evident flaws, it provides a decent amount of entertainment, gruesome kills, a reasonable share of creepy moments, fitting music and most of the action takes place inside a creepy old mansion, inhabited by rotting zombies. Honestly, what more can you possibly expect in an Italian horror film from the 80s?

In "Killing Birds: Raptors" (which has little to do with killer birds, just so you know), a group of young university students get together for a research, in which they must find out the whereabouts of a rare breed of woodpecker. The students' expedition is cut short when they find a rotting corpse in an abandoned truck, and decide to find shelter in a creepy old house (of course!), which is inhabited by two horrendous creatures that lurk around the place. One of the students actually has a past that is connected to the house and the decaying creatures that are out to get them. However, until they find what the hell is going on, most of them will encounter a gruesome death.

"Killing Birds" is actually a film that is less convoluted and messy than some of its "equivalents" from that period, like "Ghosthouse" (1988) or "Witchery" (1988), among many others. Now, that doesn't mean that we don't get a fair amount of random ridiculousness and we won't have to sit there and watch a bunch of scenes that are solely there for shock value, even if they make zero sense or add nothing to the story. Italian horror flicks from the 80s are pretty random and you either have fun with that, and don't ask a lot of questions or you hate them, because of their lazy writing.

"Killing Birds: Raptors" is worth the watch to anyone who enjoys b-horror flicks from the 80s, that lean a little bit more to the absurd side. It features everything that one would expect from these unpretentious films and, believe it or not, it actually provides genuine moments of creepiness. Nothing that really stays with you, but imagery gruesome enough to satisfy horror fans that simply want to have fun, without expecting superb writing.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
this is even worst than zombie 90 extreme pestilence movie
theromanempire-112 November 2018
For years I searched to find a zombie movie that is worst than that german amateur effort called zombie 90: extreme pestilence movie and I found it. at least that movie was a real zombie movie with lots of gore. bad movie yes. auful gore yes. but at least it was a zombie movie. this movie killing birds is also bad in every way but it's not even a real zombie movie. even the title is false and misleading. if u want to check one of the worst officially called zombie movies ever made then this is for you.

to get a clue even the bad zombie 3 and zombie 4 after death sequel movies to the fulci 1979 classic zombie film (zombie 2 dawn of the dead) ARE MASTERPIECES COMPARED TO THIS FLICK for the only worth element in this flick it's........THE TITLE ITSELF.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Really Bad
Michael_Elliott10 March 2008
Killing Birds (1987)

* (out of 4)

Incredibly bad, cheesy Italian horror film that's nothing more than a rip of Night of the Living Dead (again). A group of college kids travel to the Louisiana bayou for research and come under attack by zombies. There's also a side plot with a knife welding maniac and killing birds but none of this makes any sense. The gore footage is pretty good but the rest of the film is a real drag. Robert Vaughn has a small role in the film but adds nothing.

On DVD under the title Zombie 5 Killing Birds. Joe D'Amato directed some of the footage.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not even "The Man From UNCLE" could save this movie
EllenRipley11216 April 2007
It's a sad part in any actor's career when they have to resort to this kind of malarky to make the mortgage payments. Thank God Robert Vaughn was able to recover from this mindless excuse for a movie--forget "zombie" movie. And whoever decided to link this to the far-superior Fulci series by tacking "Zombi 5" onto the title needs to be taken out and maimed. A lot. Not only does this bear little-to-no resemblance to Fulci's films, it was made prior to some of them, so to be #5 in a series is pretty stupid in and of itself. The original title doesn't even make sense until the very end--the birds themselves kill only one person. The first 10 minutes or so was quite interesting, I will say that--as long as no one talked. As soon as we "fast forwarded" to the kids at college, it went downhill. Fast. And it's a shame these kids didn't sit at Vaughn's feet for a few months to get a hint of what acting is supposed to be--in that department, he's the only redeeming factor. The plot is stupid, the acting is poor, the deaths take too long and aren't even that good, and you can't wait for these whiny brats to die horribly. Oh well, at least now I can say I've seen it. Now if I can only forget it.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed