(1982)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Warm and vile
fertilecelluloid26 December 2004
The great Bill Margold plays a religioso who forces a member of his congregation to fellate him.

Other characters do a lot of forcing, too.

A Hollywood Boulvard, Pussycat Cinema classic that was blessed with a very memorable psychedelic poster.

A consequence of an era, a last shot at a 70's-style roughie in the early 80's that is, ultimately, quite boring, for it has few locations, virtually no story and interchangeable carnal cyphers as characters.

Margold appeared in a few questionable flickers around this time, the most noteworthy being WEEKEND FANTASY.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tobalina With a Little Plot
Michael_Elliott5 November 2018
Lust Inferno (1982)

** (out of 4)

Reverend Jerry (William Margold) is a man of God who is constantly preaching the word of the Lord. That's what he's doing in public but behind the scenes he's a rather evil man who pays to sexually abuse young girls.

This is a rather rare film from director Carlos Tobalina as it actually features a plot. As I go through the director's work it has become clear that he wasn't the greatest filmmaker and more times than not his films were plot-less and just featured a lot of mindless sex. Part of that is true with LUST INFERNO but I will give the director credit for at least trying to do something a bit more serious.

This was obviously an attempt to go after the various preachers you would see on television who were ranking in major dollars while being hypocrites to what they were saying. The events in this film are taken to the extreme and go behind good tastes with the ending, which I won't spoil here but it's certainly out there to say the least.

I thought Margold was good in the role of the preacher and for the most part the supporting cast were interesting as well. There are several goofs in the picture including various times where you can see the shadow of the cameraman but would you expect anything less in a Tobalina film? The film isn't all that well-shot and there's no question that the director's orgy fantasies take over a large portion of the film and we go without the main plot but there's enough here to make the film mildly entertaining.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very poorly made attempt at incest film with religious theme - a dud
lor_9 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The frequent team of director Carlos Tobalina and actor William Margold combined for this forgotten clunker, starting off as an unbelievably lame expose of a corrupt televangelist and ending up as an idiotic incest exploitation film. It was issued on DVD by Caballero Video several years back and now resurfaced unnecessarily as one of Vinegar Syndrome's innumerable Troy Benny (aka Tobalina) titles.

I'm reviewing the Caballero edition, mainly because my newly bought Vinegar reissue won't play (only its co-feature on the DVD starts and tracks). After the typically pompous credit announcement by CT that organized religions operate tax-free, we are treated to dull and "seen it a million times before" footage of Margold as the TV reverend, preaching to his flock and performing two faith healing "miracles" on a blind man and a crippled girl. Soon after we see that these two unfortunates are just shills that earn $300 a pop to pretend at various locations for the rev's religious road show. The audience attending his revival meeting consists of stock footage of folks in an auditorium in '50s not '80s garb, footage also used in other Tobalina films reissued by VS.

At a meeting he is cynical about his defrauding the public, and that corny material is the sum total of Tobalina's "crooked clergyman" plot.

Film in essence is about the rev's peculiar sexual habits. We are introduced in usual clumsy cross-cutting first to his sexy brunette wife (Tobalina regular Rita Ricardo, looking mighty fine and delivering quality XXX content) and elder daughter Dora (I assumed it was Lynx Canon from the opening billing but IMDb contradicts this, making it an open question), each masturbating.

As for the rev, he frequents the brothel of madam Blanche (Lina Spencer) where for $300 a pop (amazing coincidence) he is provided a prostitute bound and gagged for him to flagellate with his limp dick (sort of Margold's version of the old rubber-hose treatment), lash her with a real whip, harangue with dirty talk and idiotic religious pronouncements, getting a blow job, and then giving the girl a facial. He rubs three hundred-dollar bills in the cum and throws it at her neck disdainfully. This inane ritual is repeated several times in the film to set up the well-telegraphed and stupid "trick" (pun intended) ending.

Gimmick is familiar to fans of the creative (I'm being facetious) duo: limp-dick syndrome, married to new gimmick of Margold emphatically disdaining the woman's private parts ("A woman's vagina is the center of all sins" he proclaims) so he avoids having sex with these women, to use Bill Clinton's turn of phrase. A b.j. will suffice, along with lashes (and cheap makeup effects to represent bloody welts) from his cat o' nine tails.

Neglected by Bill as a result, his wife goes to a shrink for some New Age style group therapy, an excuse for boring orgy scenes in which she gets it on with other patients and the quack doctor himself. Meanwhile old daughter Dora has a sex orgy of her own by a swimming pool -this is the scene where she looked like 2nd billed Lynx Canon to me.

The younger daughter Lucy (again her credit in IMDb doesn't seem correct to me - more research needed) wants to break out on her own and improbably gets an interview at Blanche's whorehouse, dressed up in hooker gear, dark glasses and platinum blonde wig -unrecognizable. Since in the just-previous scene we've heard horny Margold asking for a young prostitute next time it's no spoiler what will happen next.

Yes, Lucy is reluctantly hired by Blanche even though the girl is quite uncooperative - won't listen to Blanche's insistence that she be made over once again. She is duly offered up to Margold who pays an exorbitant sum for her services, but the girl balks when she sees it's daddy (he doesn't recognize her). Both Blanche and later Margold up the ante, reaching $7,000 for the young girl to be laid -an enormous sum for this 1980s movie (add a zero in today's dollars).

Since she won't do it, Margold sends his two goons (who we've seen kill a snooping reporter on his orders back in the opening reel) to grab the girl, and she is served up to him bound & gagged. Latter is an important point, since she can't explain she's his daughter while he lays good old BDSM on the hapless kid.

At this point the lameness that is consonant with a Tobalina film reaches full flower, because contradicting all the groundwork that has been laid before, Margold suddenly changes his tune 180 degrees and decides on the spot the girl's vagina may be okay to sample (beyond the procreation need that had him humping his wife so long ago) as "innocent flesh to be purified". So he has sex with his daughter, money shot on her posterior after giving it to the girl doggy-style. He pays her $7,000, but when untied, Lucy proclaims: "I love you - you don't have to pay me". Margold, amazingly overacting in his pulling faces, expresses horror at the revelation of who the girl is - freeze frame and head for the exits.

If not for the poorly identified sexual performances (mainly masturbation with dildos) by the actress playing elder daughter plus Rita Ricardo, "Lust Inferno" would have zero to offer. In total, it botches up several genres.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed