Within the Rock (TV Movie 1996) Poster

(1996 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Definitely worth the watch.
kirachloe6 July 2023
In a nut shell, this is quite the good movie for a low budget film. Theis crew hit all the right buttons, and with a bit more budget could easily have ranked higher.

My biggest marker, the script, was very solid. All the actors were given believable, appropriate dialog. The actors, with a few very recognizable names, nailed their parts, without trying to go overboard or out an appropriate character expectation. As a low budget movie their sets were limited and the creature wasn't extreme, but neither were any of them shoddy. The direction and scene setup were well thought through. All in all a SOLID performance by every segment of the cast and team.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Neutral, formula nonmovie
angelynx-218 June 2000
I really can't say anything bad *or* good about this thing. Its characters are likable enough, it's capably produced and designed, and professional-looking (except for that cheesy monster suit). However, it has no originality, no ideas, and nothing you haven't seen in ALIEN, PREDATOR, ARMAGEDDON and/or OUTLAND. It's just another formula, cookie-cutter, "grimy corporate drones in deep space versus unstoppable monster" flick. Pretty much a waste of time.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It's collision time again
unbrokenmetal9 February 2019
A rather large moon is on course for a collision with Earth. Dr Shaw (Caroline Barclay) is sent with a team of space miners to drill tunnels into that moon, preparing its destruction with explosives. However, they discover an ancient hostile life-form 'within the rock', and then they are killed one by one. Their survival is not made easier by Ryan (Xander Berkeley), the captain of the spacecraft who wants to use the opportunity and run with a fortune of platinum they discovered, too.

To many viewers, "Within the Rock" (1996) looks like a rip-off to "Armageddon" (1998) but looking at the dates, it can't be. Instead it is borrowing a lot from the usual monster movie sources "Alien" (1979) and "Predator" (1987) as well as earlier collision stories, a classic sci-fi theme going way back for example to "When Worlds Collide" (1951). The spaceship, where they still use floppy disks in the control room, looks early 80s rather than mid 90s; even for a TV production the effects are quite embarassing. So are the characters, because they leave tons of powerful explosives in the crates while trying to hit the monster with a pickaxe. The predictable story may be OK to watch once, but you won't remember it next week.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
So bad yet so much fun
Clive_W25 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film once when I was younger, then recently had the chance to see it again. when I was a kid I actually enjoyed this film somehow. Now I just realise how bad the whole thing is, the characters, are terrible, the acting is poor but the whole thing is just funny to watch, you can't help but enjoy how terrible this film is. The plot jumps at times, and the editing doesn't help matters, much like the scene when they discuss the monster in their little base, the scene is so jumpy, one point their stood round a table talking, the next over to one side, the next back to the table, as if they couldn't turn the camera, maybe it was two different sets. And what was with the ending, the guy you think is dead, although we all know he isn't, jumps out at the last minute and attacks one his crew when they are in the middle of fighting the creature, it's a complete mess at that point. Still I enjoyed it for bringing back my childhood moment of seeing it for the first time. If you ever get the chance to watch, do! It's honestly not a good film, but you just enjoy how bad it is. So enjoy.
51 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertainment
gadams-331 August 2000
I can't judge this film using normal reviewing techniques, because it's not a big budget, Armageddon type film that will comepletely blow you away. What it is is a mildley entertaining, fun-for-anyone-after-a-completely-undemanding-film-sort-of movie. Given millions of dollars and time, this would have been a spectacular, if completely un-original, dim-bulb film. But it's not. It was probably filmed over a month or less, for about a million dollars. For that, it's pretty damn good! It had a good script, with only one scene of bad dialogue towards the end (just think the worst, oldest cliche). Just goes to show that all you need is one talented person to start a film (I mean this films Writer/Director, who obviously knew what he was doing) and you'll end up with something respectable. 6/10 or ***/*****
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Defies All Logic!
DanzWMe9 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
When the opening credits show outer space by using the Windows 95 starfield screensaver, you know you're not about to see DreamWorks level production quality or effects.

But ignoring the bad production quality, amateurish special effects, blatant disregard for the established laws of science, relativity, space, & gravity, and one of the most idiotic illogical endings ever, you can get a somewhat watchable 30 minutes or so from this. You just have to turn off your brain and throw out all reason & sensibility.

In the year 2019, a rogue moon is on a fatal collision course with Earth and Dr. Dana Shaw is leading the effort to stop it. She's already convinced the President that the best solution is to land on this space moon, drill tunnels, plant explosives, & force it to change its trajectory. She's met with opposition by a hard-nosed top military General who just wants to blow it up with nukes & missiles. During a brief meeting with him and Micheal Isaacs who is an ally, Dr. Shaw reminds the General that using nukes & missiles on it will cause it to rain Kansas size asteroid fragments upon the Earth thus destroying Earth and all life on it.

The General and Mr. Isaacs are never seen again in the rest of the movie.

Dr. Shaw joins a rag tag crew of space miners/drillers who have landed on this rogue moon that looks just like a giant meatball, have set up a special atmosphere generating barrier that produces oxygen, & who have already begun drilling the 3 tunnels that will have explosives put into them.

Because of this atmosphere barrier technology they are using, they are able to walk around in freezing cold space on this space moon without any spacesuits or helmets & breathe just like they would on Earth. They only use a face mask when drilling to block the flying dust. Big stretch but okay.

They are out drilling one day & drill/blast into a cavern that contains alien skeletons & artifacts scattered about the floor, has alien writing encased in platinum lining the walls, & has a fossilized alien creature embedded into the wall. The captain, who is a major sexist A-Hole horn dog, decides he'll take the platinum that's covering the walls as a bonus payment for him & his crew.

The next day while out repairing the atmosphere barrier generator, 2 of the crew are killed by a remarkably unscary generic alien monster. The generator is down so they now have to start wearing spacesuits outside in order to work & breathe. Hmmm who woulda thought!

However, they still don't wear full spacesuits that cover their entire head as the back is compeletly open & exposed to the space atmosphere. They should have been killed the second they stepped outside day one by getting instantly pressurized but okay.

The crew keeps going outside even after the first 2 get killed so one by one they get killed by the alien. Best kill goes to the explosive expert lady who gets attacked by the alien & while it's on top of her fighting her, she tries to shoot it with her explosive drillbit gun but ends up shooting herself in the head with it & drilling her brain. Talk about butter fingers.

The captain fights with the alien too & also ends up shooting himself with his own gun when his bullets ricochet off the hard alien armor skin & hit him right above his heart. In all other movies I've ever seen, that's an instant kill but ignoring the laws of relativity & science, the writer/director decides this doesn't kill the captain but instead he will resurface at the most inopportune time. Alrighty then!

The remaining crew including Dr. Dana Shaw decide to trap the alien using fire extinguishers (obviously) because they contain CO2 that the alien can't breathe & then will plant explosives & blow up the space moon (but isn't that what the General recommended from the beginning).

They were able to easily deduce that the alien was in hibernation but when they drilled into the cavern, it didn't come alive right away because they had introduced oxygen into the cavern from their atmosphere barrier generator. When the generator failed, the open cavern was filled with the regular atmosphere of the space moon & the alien was able to breathe it & come alive. Easy peasy explanation.

So after a few more deaths, they plant the explosives, fight the alien, fire extinguish it enough to get it caught in front of the large drill & just as they're ready to drill it to death, SURPRISE, the A-Hole should be dead captain pops up, attacks them but not the alien & gets killed. Remarkably, his fatal self-inflicted gunshot wound to the heart has disappeared & there's no sign of blood on him. He should have bled out 2 days ago! How tf is he still even alive!

The rest of the crew finally drill the alien to death, board the escape ship, & detonate the explosives blowing the space moon up. They watch a simulated computer scene that shows the fragments successfully changing course & missing Earth.

In the end, it wasn't a moon after all. The aliens who trapped the monster alien shot it out into space in a metal box & over time, rocks & debris attached to the box & formed the moon/asteroid/planet that the crew landed on. The giant meatball.

"Wait, What!" Moments: 1. They're in freezing cold crushing outer space on a space moon but they can walk around with no suits, no full head-covering space helmets, in short sleeves, & only a covid N95 face mask on their face to only block drilling dust!

2. The alien was fossilized & stuck in cave walls but it fully re-hydrated, grew thick armor skin, & came to life with just a gush of atmospheric wind!

3. In the end they decide to blow up the space moon but not to kill the alien because they had already killed it. Why didn't they just plant the explosives, leave & blow it up within the first 48 hours of arriving!

4. They were on a critical mission to save Earth from fatal collision but they only sent 7 people on such a vital mission!

5. The stupid captain shoots himself in the heart, lays outside on the ground for close to 30 minutes minimum but the alien doesn't finish him off! & the rest of the crew don't even go back to check on him or look for him on the security cameras (well that's understandable because they hated him)

6. The fatally shot captain comes back at the end to try to kill the remaining crew! Just why! Why was that a rational ending! That's not even a twist because it makes no sense, is quite irrelevant, & adds nothing to the plot or ending!

7. Why didn't they communicate with mission control EVER & especially once the schnitz started hitting the fan! It's like NASA cut them off & didn't even expect them to make it back. Not once did the crew try to contact NASA to let them know they were being killed off, that they had awakened & encountered a hostile alien, & that they no longer had a working atmosphere barrier generator! They weren't even communicating with NASA/home base to give them updated status reports on their drilling progress. That's definitely something you'd think NASA/Earth would want & need to know!

Summary: There's nothing to take from this movie. You won't root for the characters. Your imagination won't be transported through space. You'll find it darn near impossible to suspend belief on nearly every aspect of this. You'll side with the alien because you'll relish in the knocking off of the 2nd most idiotic space crew in cinema history (#1 idiotic space crew EVER - Life (2017)). You'll scratch your head profusely wondering why the writer/director even chose to set this in space but shoot it as if it were taking place on Earth in a cavern/mine. There was nothing indicating they were in space other than them telling you it was.

Few Similar Movies That Copied Aspects: Deep Impact (1998) - better Armageddon (1998) - worse, flat out stunk Mission to Mars (2000) - better Red Planet (2000) - better Space Cowboys (2000) - better Ghosts of Mars (2001) - better Life (2017) - about same level (but worse since it's much newer/recent)

Brian Krause from Sleepwalkers (1992) is in it. This is only 4 years after his hot lead role in Sleepwalkers but he's utilized like an extra in this.

Watch if you just like this type/plot of movie. Otherwise, you can avoid it & still live a fully productive & happy life without having missed anything.

Watch if you just like this type/plot of movie. Otherwise, you can avoid it & still live a fully productive & happy life without having missed anything.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Only 3 of 'Em Survive
saint_brett4 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It must be noted that I'm watching 'Within the Rock' on short notice, and with my eyes hanging out of their head, so I'm unprepared and susceptible to its unprotected onslaught.

A one-eyed Wraith ghost seems in distress as it does its best to contain an escaped Terror Dog with a flame and seals it in a Hellraiser puzzle box, which miraculously orbits its captivity somehow?

Claire Danes and a G-man, working for an earthly organization, discuss battle tactics on a planet billions of light years away.

Meanwhile, on Planet Somewhere, a man wearing a wetsuit with a receding hairline and what's-her-name from 'Million Dollar Baby' have 95 days to work with before Earth explodes. It's not explained why, but they have to drill on Planet Somewhere in paintball shooting Woodchuck masks.

One minute she's on Earth, one second later, and what's-her-name is on Planet Somewhere and is the new fish with the wetsuit fella.

What they're looking for to prevent Earth from exploding, I have no idea?

Tin Tin from that Eric Draven movie and Tom Green play a video game with Power Gloves.

Is that Steve O?

Not making any sense, this one who looks like either Claire Danes, Hilary Swank, or Martika actually resembles Eddy Redmayne in a wig.

This bearded guy looks like either Peter Jackson or Gunnar Hansen.

I'll be damned - this actor was in 'Pulp Fiction' down in the basement with The Gimp.

This is the second movie in a row that I've watched where all they've got to do in outer space is drill for unknown sources and use TNT to blow their way to riches. How this is supposed to help planet Earth is beyond me.

Obviously inspired by that beautiful big butterfly from 'Alien Resurrection,' a Hellraiser beast, mosiaced on a wall, takes form and talk about setting a cat among the pigeons.

Eddy Redmayne, in a wig, reduces some GI Jane to tears over lost memories and dead parents.

Can we hurry up to the part where the Hellraiser beast starts picking everyone off?

I don't know what they're drilling for, and I'm sick of them discussing extended working hours.

Was that Rawhead Rex?

Can I make an observation? Why are these twits doing it the hard way, by drilling manually for hours, when earlier the GI Jane soldier used TNT to blast her way through platinum steel?

I think the movie was about spacemen drilling for oil on an away planet, and some alien was accidentally defrosted and on the loose?

Of course, your customary Burke character wants to bring the beast back with them alive, thus creating conflict with the rest of the crew and resulting in a brawl at the end, while the Hellraiser beast is easily slain with drill bits and fire extinguishers.

And there you have it: 'Within the Rock' is a total waste of an hour and thirty minutes.

Think of what else you could be doing with that time.

Life's too short to waste it on this so-called entertainment.

And entertained I wasn't.

One point is warranted because there is an alien in it.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Another Alien copy !
Phroggy24 March 1999
This crew-versus-monsta has been done a hundred times, sometimes better. This one was pretty slow-moving ; only the monster's resurrection was really worthwhile. Attempts at character developments gets botched by routine. Yeah, "routine" is the word. Went straight to video in France. No wonder
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Did They Even Try?
tjgarrison-8067119 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Let me preface...

I know this was a made for TV movie and, as such, one shouldn't have super high expectations. Though not all that original,the premise is a fun one, and has some potential to be tense and entertaining.

All I really wanted from this movie was Armageddon mixed with Alien. To it's credit, it tried (the tiniest bit) to toss in a few twists and ideas of it's own, but the plot just feels like a first draft that was written in a day then put on screen.

It's not the worst thing ever, but it certainly isn't good. The creature's design, though not awful, wasn't very interesting to me. Beyond that, whenever they tried to explain what it was or how it did what it did, it wasn't told very well and just didn't make any sense.

SPOILERS

So, the creature eats dead things. You with me so far? However, for some reason, I guess it will only eat dead things that it kills (the movie never says that) so the people on its original planet trapped it in a metal box and shot it into space with a warning/description about the creature written on its walls (the inside though).

This 1,000,000 year old warning is written in binary code that translates to perfect English by the way.

Obviously the monster is freed by the drill team that has come to redirect the moon the box is on from hitting the earth (but apperantly the moon formed around the box...I guess?) and starts picking off the crew one by one when it isn't getting knocked over or hit by things.

You obviously have the A hole character, only in it for the money, who tries to bail out and leave everyone for dead. However, at the climax (for some reason) he comes back to kill the remaining crew (why? I don't know...the movie doesn't care) and dies because he's an idiot.

Oh, and by the way, the monster is weak to drills. Guess this ancient civilization that could shoot a box INTO SPACE couldn't figure that out.

SPOILERS OVER

So, clearly I'm not a big fan of this movie. I love B movies, and monster movies. I'd just seen Peter Benchley's The Creature a few days earlier, and was very pleasantly surprised by it on all fronts so, just because Within The Rock is a TV movie, it shouldn't get a pass.

It's clear that the movie was made with as little time, money and effort as possible just to get a quick buck.

Even so, to its credit, the movie isn't too long and I was never super bored. Maybe with some friends late at night, you could get a few laughs out of it. Even for that, though, there are WAY More entertaining movies out there than this.

My recommendation, skip...
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's a made for TV sci-fi movie- It's not going to have F/X on the scale of Star Wars
nasknit1 January 2007
Apparently some people are not used to made for TV movies. Possibly too young- they were everywhere in the late 60's and into the 70's. They do not have a huge F/X budget like Star Wars, Close Encounters of the 3'rd Kind, or Superman, etc. However, Within the Rock is way above the Sci-Fi 'B' movies of the 50's and 60's.

As to the plot, NASA and quite a few world governments are concerned about the possibility of a 'rogue' celestial body impacting our planet. A few years back, an object passed within something like less than a million miles of Earth- on a galactic scale, this is approximately next door. And, let's not forget the extinction level event that occurred 65 million years ago, that left iridium layers that are bigger than any other found on this planet ,and coincidentally occurred when dinosaurs became extinct.

The actors by and large were fine- sci-fi is not Shakespeare. If I wanted to watch Shakespeare, that's what I would be watching.

I liked this movie and recommended it to my sister.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A good b-movie... similar plot to Deep Impact/Armageddon... done better though.
frightfan4 May 1999
A "renegade moon" called Galileo's Child is headed for Earth. A drilling team is sent to create tunnels to be used as propulsion channels for a nuclear detonation that is to divert the moon from its collision course. That in itself is a rough job, but add to that one very angry awakened-from-hibernation alien, and you get an entertaining film containing cool makeup effects and good character development. A good bet for a relaxing night of no-brainer cinema.

(sounds a little like two other recent movie plots huh? - this was done two years earlier and to better end than one of them - so who copied who?)
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An better, underrated, well-made 90's Sci-Fi B-Movie
gabedrumminggamer1 March 2013
I'm one of those people that actually enjoy B-movies. Well, B-movies that aren't stupid. Anyways, I watched "Within the Rock" with very low expectations. My expectations were exceeded. Let's face it: 90'S Horror and Sci-Fi movies were mostly crap. However, this film manages to pull off being crappy with a good story, average acting, average effects, and a pretty cool monster. This film has cool fights, suspenseful jumps, and an interesting look at space-mining.For the little amount of money that was used for this film, it was used well. I recommend "Within the Rock" for anyone who will settle for an average, entertaining Sci-Fi flick.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Armageddon with an Alien
chemical_rat8 August 2000
I received this movie from a friend, claiming that it was a great movie I couldn't afford to miss. I asked him what it was about, and he said the story involved rock aliens, which immediately attracted my interest. After watching it, I thought the movie was average in every aspect, but leaning more towards the 'bad' side.

The movie is about a huge asteroid heading towards good ol' Earth, and (not to the viewer's surprise) people are sent up in a space ship to drill the asteroid to pieces. The spaceship "Galileo's Child" is a cheap piece of plastic, which they have projected onto the Windows 95 Starfield screensaver to create the flight-through-space scenes. That's the way it looks like. Aboard the ship are the typical bad ass "space pirates" plus a "misunderstood" scientist played by Caroline Barclay. They land on the red asteroid (which looks like a floating meatball) and start drilling away. With big drills. There is no logic in this, however.

This movie is set in the far future, so why not have automated drills, so they don't need to spend money on oxygen canisters etc. "Because then there'd be no killing scenes." Oh boy.

But hell is set loose when on the 3rd day (I think), the guys stumble across a grave filled with artifacts and other styrofoam crap. Of course, everybody (except the 'cool' scientist) goes nuts and start stealing the valuable alien plastic, but OH NO, the ancient guard of the stone grave is resurrected, to protect the grave from Zzzzz...

I won't tell you about the rest, but it is all so predictable. Most of the scenes are blatantly "ALIEN" rip-offs, and it all happens so slooowly, that the scenes get boring. There's only one good kill scene, and that's where one of the bad asses gets a drill through her head. Slowly, too - but painful. The alien itself looks like a walking piece of styrofoam rock. And it looks happy the whole time.

Even though it has it's extremely bad moments, the movie is enjoyable at times. The actors are complete crap, so you'll love it when they die. DIE.

Overall: 4/10
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cheap, but better
JW-3017 December 2002
Its cheap. The effects, the actors, everything on low budget. However, the script and direction are is quite good - compared to Michael Bay's Armageddon, which is extremely lame and boring once you leave out all the expensive effects and high-pay actors. Heck, it is even _with_ them, if your mind happens to wake up during the show. In contrast, this movie is original (in parts), it's refreshing low on pathos, and by far less expensive in production. I'd chose it over Armageddon anytime.

The alien sidestory is obvious, and OK. I hope director and writer Mr. Tunicliffe, whose other works are primarily in the special make-up department, will find time to hone his directing and writing abilities. There's potential, but he needs training.

Not bad for his first script and direction! 6/10, especially in comparison with Armageddon
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Generic 'alien on the loose' flick
tom_koopa3 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A huge asteroid is on it's way to smash the Earth, so a team of scientists and drillers is sent there to dig into the rock and blow it up from the inside. While digging they find a chamber with some sort of alien fossil inside. Of course eventually this fossil becomes alive and starts to maul the crew one by one.

This movie is basically a fusion of Alien and Armageddon (although not as good as either film, not even close).

It's an okay movie in the genre, although I will admit seeing it at a young age left an impression on me. The creature looks decent enough. Sadly there's nothing really redeeming about this movie. All the aspects are just.. generic. I think that's the best word to describe this movie. It has a few good scenes, but in the end it just doesn't wow you.

If you're a fan of movies like these, go ahead and watch it. Just don't expect a masterpiece.

My rating is 6/10
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bad Space scenes
Walle-29 March 1999
A meteor is heading for earth. A team is sent to the comet to drill into the middle of it and blow it up before is smashes into earth (sounds like Armageddon?).But then they have to fight for their lives when a monster that has been dead for many million years come to life. Think the movie is pretty well done for a b-movie except the space scenes they look just like when you have the "fly through space thing" on your computer.

Grade: 7 out of 10
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
B-Movie
Op_Prime27 June 1999
The film is not very impressive. The meteor heading for earth looks like a meatball being thrown around in slow motion, the alien isn't very scary looking, and character development leaves something to be desired. Overall I'd give it a C.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed