Fearless (1993) Poster

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
134 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Trauma of the Modern World...
Xstal14 June 2020
Films like this, where the main character survives a plane crash, reveal more of how unprepared a hunter gatherer mind is to the trauma of the modern world, let alone after a traumatic event. When the fight or flight mechanism is unable to function, when there's nowhere to run and nothing can be done, the stress and anguish experienced must be one of the most painful emotions a human mind can experience. We also get another perspective, perhaps one more recognisable, through the helplessness of losing a loved one, a young child, in the same tragedy, completely unprepared and instant.

Yet we continue to push, push, push, backing ourselves into metaphorical corners with no means to escape or defend ourselves. This is deep introspective film making, as relevant as ever, with great performances from some truly great actors.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
To love life, it helps to lose it
hylinski1 January 2010
Peter Weir is unique in his ability to convey the niceties of life with authenticity. Jeff Bridges is the master of the theatrical understatement. A plane crash creates a untenable level of fear in the mind anyone who has stood next to one and pondered that fate.Henryk Gorecki's Symphony No 3 creates an overwhelming sense of sadness. Fearless benefits from all these things, as well as a strong supporting cast.

I cannot watch this movie without being buffeted emotionally. I know many film lovers prefer a more concrete plot and less tugging at the heartstrings. They should turn to a different page now.

Fearless is a gem for anyone else.

I hasten to add America, the Peter Weir was only on loan, and we want him back in Australia.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Letting go of fear doesn't work for those around us
sol121829 November 2003
*****SPOILERS***** Max Kline, Jeff Bridges, not only survived a deadly plane crash that cost the lives of some 200 passengers he also saved about a dozen people from that burning inferno. Max becomes a hero in the eyes of those that he saved as well as the news media. Max for some strange reason seemed to walk away from it all as if nothing happened which to many,including the FBI, seemed weird and strange. The airline sends a trauma expert Dr. Pearlman ,John Turturro, to examine Max as well as the other survivors to see if their all right and if not what treatment they would need.

The movie "Fearless" concentrates on two survivors and one wife of a survivor who are in some way connected to each other. Because of the tragedy. Max's friend and architect partner Jeff Gordon, John DeLancie, was killed in the crash and left a wife Nan, Deirdre O'Connell, with two little children. Jeff greedily switched the tickets that Max gave him for the flight for cheaper ones that didn't have life insurance to cover himself. Carla Rodrigo, Rosie Perez, who also survived the crash, thanks to Max, lost her little boy when he fell out of her hands and was killed. This made Carla fall into a deep depression by holding herself responsible for his death.

Max's change of life after the crash comes into conflict in dealing with the realities of both Carla and Nan as well as his wife Laura, Isabella Rosselini, in getting his life back to normal. Max soon develops a fearless attitude toward death and during the movie risks his life as if he were tempting death to see somehow that if he's really dead or not. Carla is the only one who seems to bring Max back to the real world with her depression over her sons death in the crash. That makes Max go out of his way to show her that she wasn't responsible. Having Carla her sit in his car one evening and having Carla hold a tool box, as if it were her baby boy, Max then crash the car full-force into a brick wall! This was to show her that she couldn't have held on to her child to save him from the plane crash: a bit insane but it worked in curing Carla of her severe guilt feelings.

The car crash also settled Max's not wanting to lie about Jeff's death. Jeff's lawyer Brillstein, Tom Hulce,wanted Max to lie about the circumstances of Jeff's death to get a bigger settlement. Now Max doesn't have to testify by showing that he became suicidal because of the plane crash and thus lost control of his mental faculties.

It was shown in the movie, after Max survived the plane crash, that everything that Max did he seemed to be guided by some invisible force. Like the one which had Max lead those survivors of the plane crash to safety. This unseen force made those who thought that Max was a bit strange and odd see that he was in some way a changed but better person because of it.

The end of the film seemed a bit confusing but thinking about everything else in the movie that lead up to it did somehow make sense. Max, with his wife present, picks up a strawberry from Nan's lawyers batch of gifts that he had and munches on it which seems to poison and kill him. It was explained early in the movie that Max had a deadly allergic reaction to strawberries since he was a child. With everyone thinking that he's dead Max miraculously comes back to life with his wife happily holding and kissing him.

We've seen earlier in the movie Max eating strawberries, again tempting death, with nothing happening to him! So why then should anything like him possibly dying from eating the strawberries happen to him now when it didn't happen before in the movie? Was it that strange force or was it Max himself in getting him and his wife Laura back together since their strained marriage, due to Max's relationship with Carla after the plane crash, which had him and his wife on the verge of separating and divorcing! Deep and interesting movie about how facing death in the present and surviving changes us for the better in facing life in the future.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
jeff bridges at his best
eht5y21 July 2004
Jeff Bridges has been called the most underrated actor of his generation, and 'Fearless' speaks to the truth of such a claim. Equally overlooked is Australian director Peter Weir, who, like Bridges, was snubbed by the Academy Awards for 'Fearless.' The film was almost totally ignored by the Academy, perhaps due to the fact that 1994 was the year of the historical/political epic--'Schindler's List,' 'In the Name of the Father,' and 'The Remains of the Day' were the big winners that year, casting a bit of a shadow over a film about a rich white American suffering from PTSD.

Based on the novel by Rafael Yglesias, 'Fearless' is the story of Max Klein, a successful San Francisco architect who survives a horrific plane crash. Among the casualties of the crash are Klein's partner and best friend and the only child of Carla (Rosie Perez), a young Puerto Rican woman from Oakland who blames herself for her son's death. Prior to the accident Max suffered from an acute fear of flying; when the plane goes down, his fear becomes so intense that he accepts death. When he survives the crash, he suffers from a form of post-traumatic stress syndrome in which he can no longer feel fear because subconsciously he has already faced death. His condition creates a rift between himself and his family, a gap he tries to fill through a friendship with Carla, who is similarly afflicted with PTSD.

Bridges gives a tour de force performance as Max, who is simultaneously heroic (he leads other passengers to safety believing he is guiding them out of the plane into heaven) and contemptible (he is unspeakably cruel to his family and leaves his wife temporarily to pursue a relationship with Carla).

He's not sure whether he's alive or dead, and he is frequently drawn to test his fear and uncertainty through ludicrously dangerous stunts like dancing on the edge of a skyscraper's roof or walking calmly into speeding traffic. It's an unflinching and emotionally honest portrayal of a psychologically damaged man unsure that he has the strength or will to be healed.

Equally stunning is Rosie Perez as Carla, a devout Catholic who believes that her baby's death is a punishment from God and is nursed back to normalcy by the agnostic Max.

Other supporting actors are also captivating: Isabella Rosselini as Max's wife Laura, who loves her husband desperately but is unable to cope with Max's alienation from her and their son Jonah; Tom Hulce as an overeager but well-meaning attorney suing the airline on behalf of Max, his partner's family, and Carla; John Turturro as a psychiatrist specializing in PTSD hired by the airline to help the survivors cope with the after-effects of the tragedy; and Benicio Del Toro as Carla's husband, a poor carpenter who can't help but feel giddy about the possibility of making millions off of his son's death. Perhaps most moving is Deirdre O'Connell as the widow of Max's partner--the scene in which Max arrives at her home to confirm that her husband did not survive the crash will break the hardest of hearts.

The film is brilliantly directed by Weir, who captures the surreal nature of Max's condition masterfully.

'Fearless' is not an easy film to get through, perhaps even moreso in the wake of 9/11. The subject matter is emotionally wrenching, and its presentation is utterly unsentimental. Max is heroic, but he is also a victim, and Bridges' performance captures the tension between Max's newfound love of life and his near-psychotic need to continually face and overcome his fears. It's a tear-jerker, and it's certainly haunted by the ghosts of the dead, but it's well-worth watching if only for the pleasure of seeing one of the best actors in the business at his best.
109 out of 123 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Plays with dramatic clichés, but clichés, and a Bridges who needs complexity.
secondtake17 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Fearless (1993)

Peter Weir has directed some great, unique movies--Galipoli and Picnic at Hanging Rock are two of my favorites. So I watched this with curiosity at first. And then boredom. And then a kind of draining disappointment. I can see how the drama, and the various characters involved in it, might really draw someone in and move them. So this is just my own take on it, a fair balance to the others, I hope.

The shock of being in a plane crash is played out by Jeff Bridges as a young professional who survives. This is gripping enough in the first scenes. This survival is played out through Bridges over the next fews days as he visits other survivors and sees the range of their inabilities to cope. Throughout, Bridges is asked to play with a calm that at first seems to be a blank slate for our growing into his complexity. His own complete acceptance and almost joy at having survived seems to have no down side, except having to run from television cameras or stand on rooftops screaming. Normal things, I suppose. This is how we are made to see his mind working through the horror he has repressed.

But the blankness is a cover for an unresolved shock, and this doesn't unfold easily. Von Trier or Bergman or even Hitchcock might have made art out of this, but Weir can't pull it off. His earlier movies are gems of situation, of how groups of people behave within circumstances. Fearless is different in that it goes inward, trying to be about a person's mind. And yet, Weir still plays Bridges as if he were foremost a character among other characters. When we do go inward, it is mostly through his memories of the event, which are given predictable elements of fear and horror. (It's a plane crash, after all.) As for how Bridges copes, you will see either beatific gazes or screaming to himself.

The basic idea is great movie material, but I didn't find the psychology convincing. The writing is stilted and worn out before it starts. The narrative is broken up with cheap flashbacks and with irrelevant and unconvincing scenes of tacky lawyers looking for money. Clichés. Even the extended and manipulative ending, which by that point is so unnecessary and indulgent for all its fire and visions of heaven, just leaves you feeling battered.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Character Study That Goes Beyond
jhclues9 November 2002
The inability to `reconnect' in the wake of a significant emotional event, especially one involving a close encounter with death, is examined by director Peter Weir, in `Fearless,' a gripping drama starring Jeff Bridges as a man emotionally adrift after walking away from an accident (a plane crash) that by all rights should have killed him, but inexplicably did not. And Weir goes on to take what is essentially a character study one step further, beyond the inevitable `why me?' that one who survives such an unimaginable episode in their life must necessarily make, to probe the psyche of the survivor and attempt to sort out the ensuing catch-22 of the mind, wherein the incident has manifested a schizophrenic sense of guilt/euphoria born of fate's decree that he, among those now dead, should live. It's a lot to assimilate; a taxing physical and psychological challenge necessitating an expanded utilization of the human capacity, and the subsequent negotiation of the attendant recast attitude and aptitude. All of which Weir succinctly captures through keen observation and his own intuitive grasp of the human condition.

As the film opens, we see Max Klein (Bridges) making his way through a cornfield just outside of Bakersfield, California; he's carrying a baby in his arms and has a young boy by the hand, leading him determinedly through the haze of smoke from the crash. There are others following Max, as well. And even before they emerge from the field, coming upon the crash site where rescue workers are already furiously attempting to sort it all out, there is a detachment about Max that is readily discernible. He surveys the situation calmly, as if seeing it all through the eyes of someone else, as if he were outside of himself, observing rather than experiencing. Then after locating the baby's mother, he simply walks away from it all, never looking back.

Two days later the F.B.I. finds him in a local motel. They put him together with a representative from the airline, who offers him a train ticket back home to San Francisco. But Max wants to fly home, which astounds the rep. `But your wife,' she says, `Told us that you didn't like to fly, even before the--' `The crash?' he replies. Then with assurance he tells her, `I want to fly home on your airline. But I have a request; I want to go first class.' And we know now, without question, that Max is not the same man that he was before the crash.

In his previous films, such as `Picnic At Hanging Rock' (1975), `Witness' (1985) and `The Mosquito Coast' (1986), Weir established himself as a director who knows human nature and is adept at exploring the emotional depths of his characters, in stories dealing with ordinary people thrust into extraordinary situations. As he does with this film, Weir sets a deliberate pace and allows that extra moment that means so much to the development of the characters. It's a subtle approach that adds depth and resonance to his films, and allows his audience to experience, rather than just watch, the drama as it unfolds. And he understands (as few directors do-- especially Americans ) the impact that `silence' can have, as in the scenes here shortly after Max leaves the crash sight. First, Weir shows us a solemn Max, driving alone through the desert at high speed, gradually awakening to the joys of living, to that `feeling' of being alive, as he sticks his head out of the widow and lets the wind hit him in the face, slapping him with the reality that he is, indeed, alive. But then we see Max parked by the side of the road, sitting on the ground, pensively staring out at the vast expanse of desert and at the low, blue mountains in the distance. The absolute silence Weir effects allows us to share Max's thoughts at that moment, to get inside his head as he picks up a bit of dirt and examines it closely, then as he looks up again at the nothingness/everything that surrounds him. As Max reflects, we reflect with him; and in that precise moment, that necessary connection between Max and the audience is firmly established. It's a quiet, and brilliant, piece of filmmaking.

Through many years and many movies, Jeff Bridges has demonstrated time and again his consummate ability as an actor who can `touch' his audience, and he continues to evolve with every new film. Max is perhaps his most challenging role ever, as it requires a vast emotional range to make this character convincing and bring him to life believably. And Bridges succeeds magnificently, and on a number of levels, with an inspiring, Oscar worthy performance. The finesse with which he conveys his moods and emotions is extraordinary; he enables you to `feel' his displacement, share his compassion, sense his empathy and know his anger. Quite simply, Bridges makes Max Klein a character you are not going to forget.

As Laura Klein, Isabella Rossellini gives a remarkable performance, as well, as the wife given the gift of her husband's life, only to have to suffer his state of `limbo,' as she desperately attempts to penetrate the defense mechanisms that have given him a renewed appreciation for the touch, taste and beauty of life, all of which she is unable to share because his experience has taken him to a place she cannot possibly go. Her portrayal is astute, convincing and some of the best work she has ever done.

Also turning in a strong performance, for which she deservedly was nominated for Best Supporting Actress, is Rosie Perez, as Carla, a fellow crash survivor with whom Max forms an especially strong and significant bond.

Written for the screen by Rafael Yglesias (adapted from his own novel), beautifully filmed by Allen Davian, and with a haunting score by Maurice Jarre that so sensitively enhances the drama in an understated way, `Fearless' is an example of filmmaking at it's best.
116 out of 135 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Superior film of spiritual wonder.
EijnarAmadeus3 December 2010
After watching FEARLESS I clearly made up my mind about actor Jeff Bridges; he is utterly brilliant. This film is carried by his performance as a man who survives a plane crash and his the following life he lives in which his complete sense of existence is changed. The film finds mystery and tragedy and goes searching in religious places for answers that we draw out of the main character. Director Peter Weir lingers on Bridges and his inner self, and the many tender scenes that he goes through are very carefully achieved, never slipping into sentiment or boring clichés. Throughout you really don't know whether Bridges is crazy, spiritual, dead or alive - he's yearning in something that everybody around him really don't see to understand. FEARLESS is a great film with many low-key scenes that tells a story thoroughly and thoughtfully, but it always escalates into joyous wonder, and that's where director Weir and Bridges truly captured me as a viewer. It's like that dark corridor towards the light in the magnificent ending scene.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the few films that in the end brought on a full-fledged catharsis
GMJames11 April 2001
When I first saw "Fearless" in a movie theater, I believe there were about 20 to 30 other moviegoers in the theater on a weekday afternoon. It was in it's second week in theaters. After the credits rolled, I heard a lot of weeping from the small but vocal audience.

Maybe the film flopped because some people expected a 1970's-style disaster flick with cardboard characters, laughable dialog and unknown extras & doubles performing dangerous stunts.

It's been almost eight years since watching "Fearless" for the first time. This is one of only 5 movies I actually own in my very small tape library.

Director Peter Weir amazes me. With a few exceptions (I didn't like "Dead Poets Society" and I haven't seen "Green Card"), he has always walked on a tightrope when it comes to telling a story. It might not result in a "satisfying" ending but when you think about what was presented two hours earlier, it makes a lot of sense. It's a logical and very fascinating progression.

I believe that Jeff Bridges can (almost) do no wrong. His character may not be very likable but put yourself in his character's shoes and you may understand the reasons why he believes that he is "fearless".

I haven't seen Isabella Rossellini's performance in "Blue Velvet" but it makes me wonder if her performance in that film beats her role as the caring but very confused wife of Jeff Bridges' character. She's definitely the heart of "Fearless". I cared for her. I felt empathy; her confusion of what her husband was doing to himself, her family and herself. She's on the outside trying her best to understand what it was like to survive a plane crash. But at the same time, not totally understanding what it was like to be on the ill-fated flight. Rossellini gave a glowing performance.

Rosie Perez's performance as the distraught woman who lost her young son in the crash was incredible. Unlike some people in this world, I do like Perez (thick Spanish accent and all). What really impressed me was how she captured the depth of losing her child. There have been some films & TV movies that have captured the effects of a family losing a spouse or adult child. There haven't been as many to deal with the loss of a child as well as "Fearless" did. Perez hasn't had a role with this much depth in a long time. I was pleasantly surprised when she received an Oscar nomination for Supporting Actress, the movie's only nomination.

The unrequited bond between Bridges' and Perez's characters was fascinating to watch. They survived something that their love ones will never understand. In the end, the two need to understand that despite their losses, they are still alive in this world and somehow they need to find a way to get back to reality.

Screenwriter Rafael Yglesias, who wrote the novel, captured the complexity of crash survivors almost flawlessly. One weak link: John Turturro had the thankless job of playing the underwritten role of the psychiatrist.

When a film like "Fearless" even inspires a music video (Brian McKnight's "Back At One"), then you know that this movie will have a lasting effect and with cable, VHS & DVD, it'll never be forgotten. I certainly haven't forgotten it.
58 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strange, intense, emotional...but what's the point?
moonspinner5521 July 2006
Director Peter Weir gets an exceptionally solid performance out of usually-hammy Jeff Bridges, here playing survivor of a horrific plane crash who feels that, since he has now cheated his death, he may be immune to all dangers. Many emotional sequences following the disaster give the picture its heart, but the final chapter brings us back to reality with too mighty a pull; how satisfying the movie ultimately is depends on whether the viewer can forgive the underlying feeling of manipulation. Still, the film is startlingly straightforward and directed with focused, intense human passion by Weir. Terrific supporting performances by Isabella Rossellini as Bridges' exceptionally patient and understanding spouse and Rosie Perez, successfully underplaying as a fellow crash survivor having troubles of her own. *** from ****
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
More intimate than sex is sharing the moment of death
MrNoahTall19 February 2000
Someone told me once that this film was supposed to be about post-traumatic stress syndrome. That's like saying that 2001 was about how to eat in space.

This is a movie about the most intimate moment a person can ever share with others: The moment of his death. The character Max (played by Bridges) is confronted with it, and his experience is ours.

This movie, for me, is best viewed alone, with no distractions whatsoever. One of the more powerful sublime moments in the film for me is when Max is merely sitting next to his rental car in the desert, making mud from his own spit. He sees it in a new way. And thus he sees the world. To a degree, so did I.
58 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good film, but has its flaws
DanHakimov8 April 2015
What happens after one dies?

"Fearless" tries to answer that question through its raw emotions, showing a survivor of a terrible plane crash who becomes truly and utterly fearless. Max, the survivor, reaches some type of spiritual nirvana when facing death directly, and is reborn in a way. However, he feels as if he's already dead, and he sees the rest of the survivors in the same way. This makes for an interesting character study, exploring what happens when one embraces fully both fear and death. Jeff Bridges has by far the best performance in the film, and showed much of the needed emotion to keep the movie afloat. The rest of the cast did a decent job (though I didn't like the child actors), and Tom Hulce was great in his little part as a greedy lawyer.

However, I felt the movie lacked some focus at some parts. The beginning was great, and so was the end. In the middle, I felt some ups and downs, and some scenes fell flat in contrast to some of the better scenes in the film. After the beginning, the film constantly flashed religious themes without much subtlety, but those stopped after the middle of the movie. The relationship between Max and Carla, another survivor, was interesting enough - but I didn't feel the actress playing Carla did the best job she could. The psychiatrist was rather superfluous to the story, and Max's wife was rather ignored in the first half of the film and didn't get enough depth afterwards in my opinion. The directing was interesting at times and unnoticeable in others, but it was overall solid. I think the script has the biggest issues of the movie - some of the lines were hideous in my opinion, and the plot itself felt a tad not fully organized.

To sum up, even though I found the film good, there were too many flaws in it which kept taking me out of the movie. The ongoing themes of Christianity felt rather annoying and preachy, some characters didn't contribute much to the emotional depth of the film, and some of the dialogues felt extremely fake to me. An interesting viewing, but I felt some aspects could have been handled better.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Criminally underrated
eonbluedan-11 January 2011
A CRIMINALLY unknown film, especially in the UK, where it is close to impossible to get hold of, this Peter Weir outing, with Jeff Bridges taking the lead, also boasts star turns from John Turturro, Isabella Rossalini, and Rosie Perez, the latter of whom received an Oscar nomination. Everybody is on top form in this perfectly executed, beautiful meditation on what it is to be a human being.

To explain all the subtext of "Fearless", all the symbolism, the various layers of allegory, would be an essay in itself; safe to say this is a film that sends you away reeling, thinking and talking about life for a long time. It sounds melodramatic, but when you see it, it makes perfect, serious sense.

I understand it received standing ovations when it premiered, and rightly so! Many have said in the past, and I'll say it as well, that the final 10 minutes of this film is pretty much the most powerful cinema I've seen. Jeff Bridges nails it, and I find myself inexplicably in tears each time. Trying to explain it is tough; it speaks to something fundamental in you, and is truly life-affirming, if you choose to listen. A film that proves cinema, when image, performance, music and meaning are meshed perfectly, is sometimes able to convey what nothing else can.
24 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent Film; Disappointing Movie
eph007-304-6653515 February 2013
This film is an interesting character study of a man dealing with fear and death.

I watched it because I'm a big fan of Jeff Bridges work as "The Dude" in The Big Lebowski but I was a bit letdown. Here's why:

The movie did not deliver enough entertainment value. Thought provoking it was but entertaining- questionable.

Also, the way the movie handled its core issues and themes seemed a little heavy handed to me.

The old chestnut about script writing that the dialogue should never be totally "on the nose" was not adhered to, in this case to the film's detriment. I found some of the dialogue to be too direct and not leaving enough room for subtext and for the viewer to feel that there is something bubbling beneath the surface. Its always better for the writer to sketch the character's struggles as metaphors and incidental to the story rather than try to force themes to lead the story and drive its dialogue.

Additionally, the Director's use of camera shots was a little slow. The style of, "Look at me, here is another important closeup on some random object for longer than we would like," coupled with the writing served to make the movie a bit melodramatic.

Aside from Jeff Bridges who does a solid job in a decent role, Benicio Del Toro was very interesting in his minor role as was John Torturro.

You will see a lot of rave reviews for Fearless largely because it has a small cult following who were emotionally impacted by it. As a regular viewer with no special connection to the film, I advise you to take these reviews with a grain of salt. They are biased.

This is not a flawless film. It is merely an interesting one with a couple good actors. Definitely Not a must see. I also wasn't crazy about Rosie Perez. Her acting was one note, loud and amateurish rather than nuanced and intelligent.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Top-Notch Acting, Average Film...
namashi_111 October 2010
Peter Weir has always been a filmmaker to admire. 'The Truman Show' is a legendary film, my all-time favorite film. 'Fearless', which released way back in 1993, sadly ranks amongst his weak efforts. However, this does become 'A Must Watch' film due to the strong performances by it's lead cast.

Academy-Award-Winner Jeff Bridges stars as a man's who's personality is dramatically changed after surviving a major airline crash. The aftermath of the character and his connections with the world... is what 'Fearless' is all about.

'Fearless' begins wonderfully, but 40-minutes into the film, it loses the pace. Even the culmination leaves a lot to be desired. Weir's direction is satisfactory, but the Screenplay has loose-ends. The Cinematography is good.

As mentioned, 'Fearless' is packed with strong performances. Jeff Bridges plays a highly difficult role with brilliance. This truly is one of his best performances to date. Rosie Perez is outstanding in a role that, again, is very Hard to play and execute. Isabella Rossellini is marvelous. Tom Hulce is hugely effective. Benicio del Toro leaves a mark, he's superb.

On the whole, Not A Gem, but surely deserves a watch for the Performances, that leave you stunned!
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Touches places in the soul never dared to be reached before
wayne-11212 December 2003
Other reviews I have read here do a great job of summarizing the plot and key elements of this film. I just want to reiterate, first, how incredible the cast is. Working in a plot that demands attention to and awareness of subtleties, *every* actor, on down to the smallest part, puts forth flawless performances, and are directed brilliantly. If I was John Turturro, I'd have calmed it down a little, but if he did that, he wouldn't be John Turturro. :)

Isabella Rossellini is given the strongest role of her career (I mean, in *Blue Velvet*, she was scorching and daring, but she was played as a bit of an archetype and dream figure, and not as a woman struggling through a life crisis in quite so identifiable a way). Rather than fall prey to playing her role as an insensitive wife who doesn't understand the extraordinary passage her husband is undergoing, she is given the chance to really be a hero in her own right. She could *never* understand--but she tries to--and gives extraordinary credibility in a role of struggling to give what she can as Jeff Bridges' Max Klein hurtles himself into his obsessive self-made universe from his ordeal and survival. When it's clear she can no longer do that, she becomes a noble warrior to fight for her own sanity and that of her son. The procession of her character is flawless and every moment feels right.

The interplay between Rossellini and Rosie Perez is played out with unexpected honesty, restraint and brilliance. Perez' Carla has her own parallel situation, with a husband who completely can't understand why she won't exploit the situation for all she can get in court (a great early small performance from Benecio Del Torro). He is, like Rossellini, troubled by the bizarre and nonobvious intimacy that has developed between his wife and Jeff Bridges, two people whose lives might never have ordinarily crossed. Perez is, as has been mentioned elsewhere here, devastating. Her grief over the loss of her son is sustained and utterly utterly credible.

This brings us to Jeff Bridges. Man, oh man, this is his career masterpiece performance--arguably the greatest leading acting role of the 1990's. He *gets* what writer Rafael Yglesias and Peter Weir are narrowly aiming for here, and it's something no other movie has approached that I've seen. It is--the instantaneous and seemingly lifelong bond that develops between those who have been through a life-changing crisis, and how that can completely absorb them to the exclusion of *everything* else in their lives. What sounds like a subtle point here is **nailed** by Yglesias and Weir, and I can't imagine another actor who could have gotten what that feels like. I know from personal experience--mine was nothing like a plane crash--but the phenomenon that this movie ventures to explore that I just described, which may seem like mostly bizarre behavior shifts in Bridges' character to those who haven't experienced what I'm talking about--is in fact as real as love, fear, or passion itself. What Bridges realizes in putting together Max Klein is that he's *utterly* lucid--he feels as though he sees things as clearly as he ever has in his life and *never* wants to let that clarity go to revert to a more "rational" way to confront the trauma he has gone through.

Others have mentioned the "why didn't this get bigger press" issue. The studio was quite nervous that this was an art house movie and didn't promote it as heavily as they might have. It actually did quite well at the box office initially and early advocacy for Bridges and Weir to get Oscars were definitely out in the review stream, but this had the misfortune of being released *just* before a little movie called *Schindler's List*, which summarily grabbed the cinematic spotlight and completely eclipsed everything else at the Oscars.

Director Peter Weir himself considers this his greatest work and was greatly stung by what he considered the slight it was given by Hollywood and the public. In many ways it has shaped a cynicism towards Hollywood he has had ever since, and it would be five years before he'd find it in himself to direct another film.
94 out of 107 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not exactly 'fearless', but 'surefooted' direction can both benefit and hinder...
Howlin Wolf12 August 2004
I watched this and "Mulholland Drive" back-to-back. (I rated them both a '6') Both Lynch and Weir are directors who know how to build moods; and this asset might be more important than any one thing you see onscreen. "Fearless" is certainly the more 'linear' film of the two, but both aim to get the viewer in their gut rather than with standout scenes.

A lot of the time "Fearless" succeeds in this intention, but ironically it might just be the undoing of the film as well. You could say it's like directing transposed to a poker game, and a lot of the time I found myself thinking: "Am I being shown a hand when I THINK I am, or is it just a bluff?" It's smoke and mirrors, details are revealed at odd moments but never without purpose. It's sometimes comforting not to have to doubt at any time that the director is in control; but it's a competence that could ultimately hurt the film; the core of it embracing so totally as it does the concept of 'abandon'.

Two characters in the film bond through their shared notion of something 'cosmic' that alienates the outsiders around them. Peter Weir is so confident with his material though, that it becomes almost like a gang of three. The character 'couple' know what they're doing/where they're going, and so does the director, but an audience member not attuned to such ethereal moments might feel stranded at times. It's almost like the story will only really 'connect' if you've lived through it YOURSELF, rather than offering much insight from a 'distanced' perspective. This is compounded by our never being told more than we NEED to know about Max. This approach may have worked for some people, but I can't say it really did for me...

A definite 'plus' regarding this route comes from the role of Jeff Bridges. Ever the interesting performer whatever the circumstances, he's permitted to be fascinatingly enigmatic here, and this only serves to make his work all the more hypnotic. Jarringly disrupting this, though, is Rosie Perez. She undermines yet another film via her grating vocals alone, although excepting this she's certainly dramatically adequate. This role, unlike "White Men Can't Jump", doesn't need someone whose permanent setting is 'shrill', and that subtracts from the moments where otherwise she's doing good work.

Max's initial unwavering confidence and insensitivity to his wife at times does this to the film as a WHOLE, too; isolating people when perhaps I would have felt better had he been an emissary spreading the good word. Hell, it worked fine in movies like "Phenomenon" for one; and THAT was with a director and material that were substantially less accomplished than this project sports. 'Engaging' though it was, I'm more inclined to think of this as a missed opportunity, then, as far as I'm concerned...
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Incredibly intense
Boyo-230 December 1998
This is a great movie that never found much of an audience. Jeff Bridges should have been Oscar-nominated for his work here. Some scenes are extremely difficult to watch, but you will never forget a lot of them. Also fantastic are Rosie Perez and Benicio Del Toro. The crash scenes are so realistic, that it is unthinkable that people actually did go through similar ordeals.
37 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
interesting premise
SnoopyStyle5 May 2015
Max Klein (Jeff Bridges) survives a plane crash and emerges a changed man. He reunites a baby with the mother and walks away from the crash. He drives off to drop in on long lost friend. He feels invincible and eats strawberries while being deadly allergic. When the FBI finds him, he insists on flying back to San Francisco. Everybody is overjoyed. However he is distant from his wife Laura (Isabella Rossellini) and son Jonah. His business partner Jeff Gordon (John de Lancie) was killed in the crash. Lawyer Brillstein (Tom Hulce) wants him to exaggerate for Jeff's wife Nan (Deirdre O'Connell)'s settlement. Airline therapist Dr. Bill Perlman (John Turturro) is working with the survivors. Max becomes a media hero. Unable to cope, Perlman connects him to grief stricken survivor Carla Rodrigo (Rosie Perez) and her callous husband Manny (Benicio Del Toro) after the death of her baby in the crash.

I like the idea and I find the first act rather fascinating. Walking away from the crash is such a great opening. However I got a bit tired of Jeff Bridges' zen master performance and I found his character rather annoying. I want to find some insight or some revelation. Instead, he's a bit of a douchey socialpath. He needs a few more explosive moments. It's great that he has a panic attack after Nan puts him in his place. I also find the compensation discussion interesting. It could have added more of that into the movie. Rosie Perez plays a depressed angry character. It gets a bit depressing to watch her. It is hard to get my hands around these characters. It's as if the movie wants the audience to join Max but I can't completely get into it.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
great film
fcasnette23 January 2006
caught this on TV last night. Second time around for me, the first time this film had a great effect on me personally. I survived a close workplace explosion many years ago and remember vividly to this day the unreal feeling going home on bus and train as if walking on air in slow motion while the whole world around me carried on bustling by as normal.

Weir again surpasses himself judged against his Truman Show and Witness standards of excellence, what an interesting film maker he is.

Bridges has never been better, if you think his comedy performance in Lebowski is magnificent you should check out his drama performance here.

Rossellini looks ravishing and delivers a wonderful and subtle performance.

Perez does very well interpreting a difficult role of an ordinary someone not too bright (as Del Toro does also doubled) trying to understand what is happening around her.

Hulce does a lovely comedy turn as the archetypal ambulance chasing lawyer.

Turtturo does a fine underplayed turn as the company hired doctor engendering sympathy.

Even the child actors do very well, obviously everything clicked in this film in what is a very difficult subject matter to get across.

This is an art film for adults, a film that looks at the meaning of existence, the journey from life to death, the randomness of chance accidents, the "bullet with your name on it", religion, atheism, the value of psycho therapy, the pain of loss, coming to terms with the insignificance of individual life in a huge universe, and the value of relationships.

It can have the same type of emotional effect as reading The Catcher In the Rye when an adolescent... if you know what I mean... you will know what I mean.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"You're safe because we died already."
scorfield-5171131 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A brave feature for a Hollywood studio to take on, this atypical avant-garde film attempts to deal with the existentialist philosophy surrounding life and death, after our protagonist, a San Francisco architect, experiences a near-death event. The epiphany and adrenaline rush that Max Klein (Jeff Bridges) undergoes in his brush with death radically alters his personality and behaviour. When the hydraulics fail on the plane on which he is aboard, setting it plunging towards the ground, amongst the panic and screaming of his fellow passengers Max has the revelation: 'This is it. This is the moment of your death. I'm not afraid. I have no fear'. The accompanying 'buzz' that his seeming invincibility produces has such an impact upon him that after surviving the crash, he proceeds to risk his life in search of an equivalent level of euphoria in cheating death. Thus, he confronts his own life-threatening allergy to strawberries, blithely walks across lanes of oncoming traffic, and in one riveting scene, stands perilously on the ledge of a skyscraper in the buffeting wind.

In addition, he is increasingly drawn to those who have shared this life-changing experience, and steadily becomes more distant from his wife and child. Bridges delivers a laconic and effortless performance, at first glance, more worthy of an Oscar nomination than his earlier less convincing incarnation of Carpenter's 'Starman'. Yet, his performance suffers from the fact that his character's smugness and introspective self-absorption are ultimately unappealing. Just as this protagonist has a growing sense of detachment from those around him, so can we the audience become more alienated from his narcissistic and zen-like attitude.

Having just launched their own production company at Warner Bros, in the spring of 1991 producers Mark Rosenberg and Paula Weinstein received an adapted screenplay from a soon-to-be published novel by Rafael Yglesias. Impressed they contacted acclaimed director Peter Weir. After a twelve-month career hiatus, Weir was actively seeking a 'broken script', a raw script as yet not worked upon by Hollywood. Drawn to the themes covered in this bold and original screenplay, Weir flew to New York to meet its author. Yglesias, whose own fear of flying led to his avidly watching any programmes on air disasters, had been heavily influenced by accounts of the crash-landing of United Airlines Flight 232 which made headlines in July 1989. Engine failure at 37,000 feet left passengers having to endure 44 minutes of descent bracing themselves for impact with the ground. Video of the emergency crash-landing at Sioux City airport with the loss of 112 lives.

As preparation for bringing such weighty and profound content to the 'big screen', director Peter Weir interviewed survivors from this crash. Consequently, Weir decided to change the nature of the film's most moving and frightening scene of Max's dream-like return to the doomed aircraft cabin at the conclusion of the movie, by dropping all exterior shots, and purely concentrating on the passengers' viewpoint, thereby heightening its intensity for the film's audience. In addition, as preparation for that six-minute opening cornfield sequence, not only did they have a field of corn specifically planted before being bulldozed over to recreate the crash site, but a total of ten days was needed to fashion the crash site, including spilling 600 suitcases of clothes, costing around $2million overall. So realistic was it that pilots of other planes flying overhead reported what they thought was a real crash.

The skills of Weir, who himself considers this feature his greatest work, are evident from the majesty of the opening scene in which Bridge emerges from a hazy, smoky cornfield holding what the audience believe to be his baby in his arms and his little boy by the hand, before the shot pans out to reveal the wreckage and carnage of a terrible air-crash. Probably the inspiration for JJ Abrams' opening of 'Lost'. Weir undoubtedly also greatly benefitted from working alongside cinematographer, Allen Daviau, frequent collaborator in Speilberg's early successes.

One cannot imagine Mel Gibson, first offered the role which he rejected as he was about to make his directorial debut, being as convincing as Bridges. Yet, the latter's efforts are further undermined by having to deliver lines of new-age psycho-babble from the screenplay by Rafael Yglesias which grate and deflect from the profound issues under analysis. As such, Max offers empty pieces of advice such as 'If life and death make no sense, there's no reason to do anything', or 'People say they want to know the truth, but what they really want to know is that they already know the truth'. Max similarly admonishes his gaming aficionado son: 'When you die, you don't get another life.' Worst of all, Max heartlessly lets it be known to those traumatised by their loss that for him he believes the tragedy was the best thing that had ever happened to him, and in acquiring his complete certitude he has lost all means of empathy and is at one step removed from humanity. Another uncomfortable aspect to this flawed character is the Jesus-like symbolism which surrounds him such as where his injury from the crash mirrors that of the Saviour on the Cross.

By contrast, Rosie Perez provides a performance worthy of earning her an Academy Award statuette, and one which should have garnered her more future Hollywood opportunities than has been the case. Her portrayal of a mother wracked by palpable grief and guilt for not having done more to save her baby is simply heart-rending. How can one forget the slow-motion scene in which she desperately attempts to breathe in the scent of another's new-born for that which she herself has lost. The relationship which builds between her and Max is the centrepiece if the movie, and one with its own spiritual connotations. She regards Max as a sort of personal Angel and in one brilliant scene breaks down as she confesses her sin of having lied and not having the courage to admit that in her eyes she killed her infant by letting go. As for Max, in the best scene of the movie he desperately attempts to help her deal with her loss, and sense of guilt at her own survival, by driving a car headlong into a brick wall, whilst she in vain attempts to clutch onto a toolbox. As we the audience watch it smash through the windscreen, it reveals the inescapable human tragedy which has befallen her. How wise the decision to have U2's 'Where the Streets Have No Name' play out this scene, adding even greater pathos.

As for the supporting cast, John Turturro is excellent as the concerned psychiatrist appointed by the airline as counsellor to the survivors of the crash, and Tom Hulce contributes well as the unconscionable lawyer motivated by maximising the damages paid by the airline, best summed up by his observation to Max over the latter's business partner who died in the crash: 'Did you see him die?..That could be worth extra money.' Despite her efforts, Isabel Rossellini has the thankless task of trying to make her vacuous character Laura appear worth living for.

Nevertheless, in spite of obvious flaws, Weir has provided one of the most touching pieces of cinematic history which should endure as testament to his art. This is down to the aforementioned opening sequence, the car crash sequence, and the finale with his treatment of the closing crash scene playing out to Gorecki's Third Symphony, while Bridges' character becomes human again and almost succumbs to his allergy to strawberries. As his wife desperately tries to resuscitate him, Max within his replay of the crash is drawn towards a spectral light, thereby replicating the famous painting of Hieronymus Bosch, 'The Ascent into the Empyrion', until he turns away and decides to come gasping back into his almost lifeless body.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Buying gifts for the dead....
FlashCallahan8 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
After a terrible air disaster, survivor Max Klein emerges a changed person.

Unable to connect to his former life or to wife, he feels godlike and immortal.

When psychologist Bill Perlman is unable to help, he has Max meet another survivor, Carla Rodrigo, who is racked with grief and guilt since her baby died in the crash....

This is one of those movies that had massive plaudits when first released, but vanished without a trace, (you can't even get it on DVD here in the UK).

And I ask myself why? It's one of the best films no ones heard of in the nineties, and it may even have a career best performance from Bridges and the rest of the cast.

It's a difficult subject matter to deal with, people trying to come to terms with loss, whereas one man, is doing everything in his power to prove everyone that something enigmatic, even sublime, happened to him on the plane.

The film would be perfect if it had the same power in the third act, like it did in the first two, but sadly, it runs a little out of steam.

The scenes on the plane are very intense and genuinely terrifying, but somewhat peaceful thanks to Bridges calming influence.

The film is asking lots of questions throughout, but if you go that little much deeper, rather than look at it at face value, it gets a little lost also (there are some scenes, that are indicating that Bridges is really dead, and in purgatory, which can be confusing at times).

But all in all, if you ever come across this movie, you must take some time out to see i, it's an amazing movie with an amazing message, it just loses it's way a little in the last 30 mins.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
PTSD Like No Other.
rmax30482320 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It helps to realize that this was directed by the Australian Peter Weir, many of whose films have oozed an ill-defined enigmatic quality. I remember the first of his movies I saw, "The Last Wave," in Palo Alto, when it was released. I'd never seen anything quite like it. And then, shortly afterward, "Picnic at Hanging Rock", which left me hanging at a much more tentative angle than the rock. Not all of his movie have been so mysterious, so bounced around, but "Fearless" is. Like "The Last Wave" it has a fuzzy supernatural element.

Jeff Bridges and a few other passengers, Rosie Perez among them, survive a horrible fiery airplane crash in California. Bridges and Perez can't get their lives together afterward. Perez, having lost her baby in the accident, blames herself and is depressed almost beyond speech. Bridges, on the other hand, feels he is now indestructible and is, furthermore, some kind of supernatural agent left on earth to help Perez recover. His near-death experience has restructured his life. He feels he is invincible. He goes to lengths that anyone would describe as extreme in order to prove it.

Bridges is always good. He always brings something extra to the role, although at times he overreaches. Rosie Perez isn't the Puerto Rican spitfire she usually is. She's subdued (for her) and effective in the character of a woman who has to realize that her baby's death was not her responsibility. Some comic moments are added by Tom Hulce as a bespectacled nervous wreck of a lawyer who sincerely wants to be sympathetic and get rich doing it. ("I know, I know, I'm a bad guy because I'm trying to get money. Don't bother saying it!") Isabella Rossellini is the increasingly distraught wife who can't understand why her husband is growing more distant, more ethereal, and appears to be falling in love with the woman he's trying to help.

It isn't one of Weir's most provocative movies but once you get into it the narrative sweeps you up, partly because you can't help wondering where the hell it's all headed. The climax seems mundane after all that portent.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Perfection
cattyfinns17 November 2003
In short, this film is emotionally devastating. I cried for an hour after seeing it and have never been so wrecked by a movie - ever! Performances are all nothing short of brilliant and the music is perfect. The end just leaves me completely undone. One of my top 3 movies of all time. The scene with Rosie Perez as a grieving mother inhaling the aroma of a baby's hair as he is carried past her, kills me.

10 out of 10.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A long movie to enjoy Jeff Bridges play
philjeudy28 May 2020
It takes a long time for the story to come to its conclusion with the final piece. That said, Jeff Bridges is such a chameleon, and it's good to see Isabelle Rosselini for what he represents in the film industry. In that sense, you can wait for 2 hours.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A strangely stupid film.
matchhappy27 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Someone close to me recommended Fearless as a fascinating film about life and death and what it all really means. On seeing it, I have to say I'd put it without question with the ranks of "Pay It Forward" as a film that sets up a realm to discuss something truly profound, but instead gives in to cheap weepy melodrama and a very empty philosophy from a promising premise. I even felt, at moments, as if I smelled the indelicate hand of Mimi Leder at work. I could hardly believe this was the director who brought us "Dead Poet's Society".

I have so many questions for Mr. Weir. What is this film talking about? Loss? Life? Death? Trauma? Recovery? Love? The film's theme wander's about as often as the it's dialog contradicts itself. Are twisted moments like buying gifts for the dead supposed to be heartwarming? Why does Jeff Bridges' character, who is supposed to have undergone a profound and meaningful revelation, seem to constantly change his mind? Why cast loud- mouthed bronxer Rosie Perez as the sensitive character of the mother who loses her child? You know from the script we're gonna have to watch that girl cry a lot... oh OK, that makes sense. Cast the most abrasive person possible to do the job. Why is Max's wife spontaneously Italian? Did Rossellini just seem like a big enough name to cast that accent without its having any relation whatsoever to the story? How did you manage to make John Turturro boring? Characters and plot lines come and go, and I can smell the stench of coffee and cigarettes in the novelists office as he tries to figure out how to fill the inconvenient space between an interesting set up and a mildly poetic, if inconsistent ending. Default to what all the cheapest modern dramatists do: fill it with TV-quality melodramatic tripe.

I was so relieved to see the budget flesh out a few million in the final sequence, because I was terrified that, since it only raked in 7 million at the box office, this paperback picture might have made money despite the wise choice of the majority of audiences to avoid it like a Sharon Stone film.
10 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed