IMDb RATING
4.1/10
2.1K
YOUR RATING
Muscle-bound twins try to smash a jewel smuggling ring.Muscle-bound twins try to smash a jewel smuggling ring.Muscle-bound twins try to smash a jewel smuggling ring.
Timothy Stack
- Albers
- (as Tim Stack)
Bob Evan Collins
- Rosehill
- (as Robert Evan Collins)
Phil H. Fravel
- Ed
- (as Philip H. Fravel)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaJames Doohan appears in this as a character called Chief O'Brien. James Doohan played Chief Engineer Montgomery 'Scotty' Scott in Star Trek (1966). His equivalent character in the follow up series Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987) and its spin-off Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993) was called Chief O'Brien (played by Colm Meaney).
- GoofsThe final fight against the villain of the movie is set at an airfield where it is quite clearly the middle of the night during a heavy downpour, then 5-10 minutes later the final scene plays and it's clearly just becoming dusk and there is no sign of there having been any rain at all.
- Quotes
David Jade: Peter, are you all right?
Peter Jade: No I'm not all right, I'm shot! He shot me!
Featured review
Perplexingly weak writing & direction are but the chief two troubles of a floundering action-comedy
Maybe I'm overreaching, but I feel like action-comedy tends to be a genre that's especially prone to bland genericness. What can be more simple than blending these two genres, neither of which necessarily require any finesse - least of all from its cast? That's not to say that such flicks can't be enjoyable, but it feels like especially in the late 80s and early 90s they began to proliferate, and everybody and their second cousin were getting in on the, er, action. Enter the so-called "Barbarian Brothers," Peter and David Paul, whose skill set was definitely weightlifting more than it was acting; John Paragon, directing his first full-length feature; and writer Jeffrey Kerns, for whom this seems to be their only credit. There's occasional cleverness peppered throughout 'Double trouble,' which would be great if it weren't counterbalanced by a lot of senselessly juvenile humor and otherwise outright dubious writing and direction. This isn't abjectly terrible, but it's also hard to earnestly recommend.
Too much of the comedy relies on the brothers bickering or otherwise carrying on like petulant schoolchildren, or cheapness like a man's posterior being exposed as he bends over, or crass quips about genitalia. In still more instances, too many to count, there's no sense whatsoever of comedic timing; there's no beat between the set-up and the punchline, so the joke rolls on past without making any impact at all. That some gags are reused is no problem in and of itself - repetition of absurdity, executed well, can be a key component of humor - but that repetition is rarely executed well, and it's employed too often.
Stunts, effects, or any bursts of action are done reasonably well, so 'Double trouble' at least has that going for it. Unfortunately, Kerns is a few kernels short of being an adept writer. Plot development is weaker here than in any other title to come to mind that I've seen, with ideas and story beats coming and going with astonishingly little meaningful connection, and sometimes no apparent storytelling logic; things happen because the narrative demands it, not because it's sensible in the course of events. In theory there's a cohesive story underneath that shoddy treatment, but it's hard to tell, and with so spotty a foundation, the dialogue, characters, and scene writing are just as likely to inspire skeptical bewilderment.
Paragon is no paragon of directorial capability, either. Scenes are constantly orchestrated with the same hopelessly unchanging, casual, tactless tenor as the humor, painted with one flat tone no matter what's happening on-screen. (A chief illustration of this is in the failure of characters to react realistically, if at all, to the events transpiring around them, whether an act of violence or an object to interact with. Even internal consistency is thrown under the proverbial bus in this regard.) The same can be said of the acting across the board, and considering some of the supporting cast members appearing here, there can be little mistaking that it's Paragon's guidance of the actors that informs both the utmost lack of color and flavor (the vast majority of the acting), and those instances of pure overacting. This is to say, for example, that whatever one thinks of 'Star Trek V: The final frontier,' it's not unreasonable to argue that 'Double trouble' is probably the worst thing that James Doohan has ever contributed to, and I wonder if the same isn't true of David Carradine, Roddy McDowall, and more. Paragon's inability doesn't wholly excuse the performances, however, for again, the Paul brothers hardly even seem to be trying.
Did I mention how bizarrely repetitive Kevin Nadeau's score is, repeating the same scant few things over and over again? All these many faults might be acceptable if this were a parody of the genre, but to be blunt, it's not smart enough to claim that tack.
If you're desperate for an action-comedy, or just supremely bored or curious, then I suppose there might be a reason to watch this. In fairness, 'Double trouble' is hardly the worst picture you could subject yourself to; again, there are fleeting moments when this seems to carry a minor spark of wit. Such moments are, regrettably, significantly outweighed by flailing, flimsy writing and direction, and performances that actively repel viewer engagement. I didn't have high expectations when I sat to watch, and still I'm a bit flabbergasted by just how poorly this was made. It's not a bad concept, but the end result is too troubled to really bother with in the first place.
Too much of the comedy relies on the brothers bickering or otherwise carrying on like petulant schoolchildren, or cheapness like a man's posterior being exposed as he bends over, or crass quips about genitalia. In still more instances, too many to count, there's no sense whatsoever of comedic timing; there's no beat between the set-up and the punchline, so the joke rolls on past without making any impact at all. That some gags are reused is no problem in and of itself - repetition of absurdity, executed well, can be a key component of humor - but that repetition is rarely executed well, and it's employed too often.
Stunts, effects, or any bursts of action are done reasonably well, so 'Double trouble' at least has that going for it. Unfortunately, Kerns is a few kernels short of being an adept writer. Plot development is weaker here than in any other title to come to mind that I've seen, with ideas and story beats coming and going with astonishingly little meaningful connection, and sometimes no apparent storytelling logic; things happen because the narrative demands it, not because it's sensible in the course of events. In theory there's a cohesive story underneath that shoddy treatment, but it's hard to tell, and with so spotty a foundation, the dialogue, characters, and scene writing are just as likely to inspire skeptical bewilderment.
Paragon is no paragon of directorial capability, either. Scenes are constantly orchestrated with the same hopelessly unchanging, casual, tactless tenor as the humor, painted with one flat tone no matter what's happening on-screen. (A chief illustration of this is in the failure of characters to react realistically, if at all, to the events transpiring around them, whether an act of violence or an object to interact with. Even internal consistency is thrown under the proverbial bus in this regard.) The same can be said of the acting across the board, and considering some of the supporting cast members appearing here, there can be little mistaking that it's Paragon's guidance of the actors that informs both the utmost lack of color and flavor (the vast majority of the acting), and those instances of pure overacting. This is to say, for example, that whatever one thinks of 'Star Trek V: The final frontier,' it's not unreasonable to argue that 'Double trouble' is probably the worst thing that James Doohan has ever contributed to, and I wonder if the same isn't true of David Carradine, Roddy McDowall, and more. Paragon's inability doesn't wholly excuse the performances, however, for again, the Paul brothers hardly even seem to be trying.
Did I mention how bizarrely repetitive Kevin Nadeau's score is, repeating the same scant few things over and over again? All these many faults might be acceptable if this were a parody of the genre, but to be blunt, it's not smart enough to claim that tack.
If you're desperate for an action-comedy, or just supremely bored or curious, then I suppose there might be a reason to watch this. In fairness, 'Double trouble' is hardly the worst picture you could subject yourself to; again, there are fleeting moments when this seems to carry a minor spark of wit. Such moments are, regrettably, significantly outweighed by flailing, flimsy writing and direction, and performances that actively repel viewer engagement. I didn't have high expectations when I sat to watch, and still I'm a bit flabbergasted by just how poorly this was made. It's not a bad concept, but the end result is too troubled to really bother with in the first place.
helpful•00
- I_Ailurophile
- Dec 5, 2022
- How long is Double Trouble?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Подвійні неприємності
- Filming locations
- 5314 Pacific Ave., Marina del Ray, California, USA(on location)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 26 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content