The Adventures of Milo and Otis (1986) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
106 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Patience Pays Off
ccthemovieman-117 March 2006
I read once where it took the filmmakers four years to make this movie. I don't doubt it. It must have taken great patience to wait and train these animals to do some of these amazing scenes. Where have you ever seen a cat nursing on a pig or a dog hitching a ride on top of a sea turtle, etc.?

There are some incredible scenes involving a number of animals. The scenery here is pretty, too. All of the above means that adults should enjoy this as much as the kids. There is nothing offensive in this nothing....nothing.

Dudley Moore's storytelling narration is a bit annoying in the beginning but settles down and is just fine, even humorous in spots. Overall, he did a credible job. The movie is short but actually could have been better had it been trimmed another 10 minutes to about 80. If you love animals, you really have to check this film out. Even if don't, the footage is so unique it's worth a look.
36 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What are friends for?
Son_of_Mansfield8 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
To be your friend when others pick on you. To come after you when you are carried off down a river. To save you from a ferocious bear. To be there when your children are born. Yes, that is what friends are for and in that great tradition comes Milo and Otis. And they are a puppy and a kitty and they are so cute! Not just them, but all the animals. This could probably win an award for pure cuteness. There is not a single human being in this movie, just animals with the voice of Dudley Moore. He even voices the female animals. That may be a tad annoying at times, but this is a fine family film and should please anyone who likes animals.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Milo and Otis
Atreyu_II16 December 2008
I'm surprised that this is a Japanese film. The reworked version in English language is apparently from 1989. "Milo and Otis" is a cute animal film. Another one of the great animal films.

The story is about the friendship of a curious orange tabby kitten named Milo and a mature fawn Pug named Otis. Our small friends live separate adventures and confront separate dangers in a Homeward Bound-like story. During this journey, Otis's aim is to search for Milo, find him and rescue him from potential sticky situations.

The film is narrated in a somewhat unusual way, but this narration proves to be effective and pleasant. The very same narration is made in a semi-comical way in many scenes. Dudley Moore does an interesting narration work.

Following the tradition of the great animal films, this one also offers beautiful landscapes. It's all natural and pure: a farm, green places, mountains, sea, rivers, sand and others. If this really takes place in Japan, then I must say that Japan is a beautiful country, actually more than I ever imagined.

I've already owned two orange tabby cats in the past. One of them was named Tiger because these cats look like tigers in miniature. Little Milo reminds me of these cats.

Milo is cute. As for Otis, he is cute too. Pugs are not gorgeous dogs but they're cute. Plus, they are friendly, fond of people and even of other animals. Also, they've got that sad, worried and tender look on their face.

This should definitely be on Top 250.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Snuff for kids...
Izabel_Grondin28 November 2014
I hate when people review a film without making any researches about it. In the 80s, there was basically no laws to protect animals. A lot of newspapers at the time reported the atrocities that the animals had to endure during this shooting, well,the ones who could survive. About 30 kittens were killed during the shooting and the most terrible thing is that most of them were killed deliberately. The famous scene when Chartran (Milo or Otis, in french the kitten name is Chartran) falls from a high cliff needed many kittens, one for each take...there's also all those terrible stuff about the little bear and the dog. The Columbia refused at that time to put in the credits that no animals were harmed during the shooting. A lot of viewers were in shock after the screening cause obviously, a film like that without any FX could had not been shot without cruelty. Chartran was not a kitten but tens of them... Boycott that piece of s...! It's not a cute film for all ages, it's a snuff for kids, a HUGE mass grave that should be remembered only for all the atrocities it has done to those unwilling animals.
112 out of 143 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cat & Dog Friends
AaronCapenBanner14 December 2013
Appealing film taken from a Japanese movie from a few years earlier has actor Dudley Moore narrating this story about best friends Milo(a cat) & Otis(a dog) who become best friends as kitten & pup growing up together on a farm, then staying that way for life. One day, Milo is playing in a box on the river that is swept downstream into the rapids, prompting Otis to follow him in a desperate attempt at rescue. Milo escapes into unfamiliar territory, with Otis right behind, and so begins a series of adventures that takes them both all over the place, through all kinds of weather, as they both meet their mates and have families of their own... Charming film is well-narrated by Moore, in a funny yet straight-forward manner. There were charges of animal neglect here, but nothing proved, and it certainly doesn't look like that was the case watching the film. Refreshingly free of humans as well!
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A cute little animal adventure strictly for the kids.
emm11 May 1999
As the sensible alternative to the first BABE movie, this one offers a lively storybook feeling through Dudley Moore's clear narration. This is just for the young children who will enjoy the lovable all-animal cast, with savoringly fine performances from our cat-and-dog duo. Best part: Milo, in his lonesome survival. Worst part: the excessive perils that keep on popping up quite often. Perfect as the big bedtime snack for the wide-awake, it's a clever and simple little kid's movie to last a good 75 minutes until the big drift-away to Dreamland.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A celebration of life
twel2fthman1 October 2002
Ever since I was 5 or 6 I would always go to the local video store and ask to rent the same movie ( Milo and Otis ) until my mom finally bought it for me. Milo and Otis is one of the few films of all time that cannot be classified into any genre. It is a film meant for all, a true celebration of life. If you have a heart, which you all do, then you will deeply feel this celebration. It's emotional and spiritual level cannot be surpassed or defined.

Some shallow people get turned off because they think the animals have been hurt. If you only knew Masanori Hata's life. He has his own island, Hakkaido, where he spent 4 or 5 wonderful years loving and viewing these animals behaviors, and is one of the biggest animal lovers of all time. Why would he put these animals in harm's way, him of all people? I would worry more about Hollywood films than him, because he is such a deep, devoted person to all animals. Watch this film, young or old, and you will be touched in a very genuine way. It truly is a celebration of life. Watch for symbols of all sorts and be led into this unhindered, unpredictable, and yet insecure and innocent loving world. This story will take you to that special place and invite you to experiance life, and will as assuredly inspire and move you. See for yourself...
53 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Milo & Otis
TravS9410 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
PLOT: A cat named Milo and a pug named Otis grow up together and become inseparable friends. When Milo gets washed down the river in a box however, Otis must follow it along the riverside in hopes of saving his friend.

MY THOUGHTS: This movie is shot beautifully. The footage consists of animals naturally interacting with one another which make it very enjoyable and even peaceful. The narrator does a good job in this movie narrating the story as well as doing all the voices for the characters.

PROS/CONS: Being that it is just animal footage (and sometimes feels as though it is randomly jumps from something to the next), makes the movie lag a lot. And even to some who may not think so, it may even become boring after a while to movie goers who need a little bit more excitement to stay interested.

OVERALL: 6/10
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Good for kids, but a grand surprise for adults!
bopdog17 August 1999
I first saw this movie because the kids demanded to see it. I was pleasantly surprised to find that "Milo and Otis" is incredible! Sure, it is "cute" enough for kids of all ages-- but it is also meaningful and real for adults, even if it might be best enjoyed as an allegory or fable. The scenes are beautiful, and the cinematography is amazing, in the stunning Japanese naturalist style. The story is bold and loving; I found humor, interest, and positive encouragement and -- dare I say it so cornily? -- life lessons. Because it is so charming, as well as entertaining, I found it to be an excellent "date" video! The kind of women I am attracted to most, tend to find this movie (at least for one viewing) a pleasant alternative to regular fare. I rate it a solid "10," and recommend it to adults-- You'll enjoy it!
44 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cute adorable, but left a bad taste in my mouth.
bilahn26 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Warning: Gives away the plot of the movie.

Yes, Milo and Otis is very cute and well done as many reviewers have said. I was enjoying it very much until near the end.

As far as the animal treatment controversy, i think a reviwer on Amazon pretty well debunks most of these concerns. Even in the 80s trick photography could do some pretty amazing things. I doubt any real harm was done to these animals. On the other hand, I am not sure standards in Japan in the 80s were what we would now expect, so I just have to reserve judgement.

My complaint is one most people won't care about, but I do; the movie's heterosexism. Now I hate to be in turn a homosexist; I do not mean to disparage marriage or raising children in any way, because I do not feel that way. I also hate to take a simple children's story and make it so darn controversial. HOWEVER, For the first 3/4 of the movie Milo and Otis is about male friendship, bonding, and heroism for each other. Then out of the blue appears "Joyce" who has absolutely nothing to offer Milo other than being female. Otis, who just saved Milo's life, is out the window. Milo doesn't care. Otis is devastated and goes off into the bitter cold snowy mountains, possibly to die. Is that a message to send kids - dump your closest buddy who saved you just for a girl? I am not suggesting they were "gay" cats and dogs, but this kind of hetero supremacy would do James Dobson proud.

Then it gets worse: Otis, out in the mountain, meets a girl-dog, and now he "understands what came over Milo." This about made me turn the thing off.

I think it is fine to make a movie about animals getting married and having cute kittens and puppies - i am all for it, but this ended up totally negating the whole feeling of the first hour of the movie. I don't object to Milo and Otis getting "married" but it should have been done very differently, and without such total disregard for each other, In the end, the deep bond between Milo and Otis, which I thought was what this movie was about, ends up being trivialized.

If you can overlook this issue though, (I can't) and assuming no animals were hurt, Milo and Otis is certainly a very cute movie and heartwarming for the most part.
2 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
9/10 when I was a kid. 1/10 now I'm an adult
jdengraver12 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
If you're an adult and you like this movie, you're either an idiot, a sadist or both.

Children get a pass for loving this movie because they do not yet understand the difference between simulated cruelty and actual cruelty.

If this film was animated, it would be fine because the distressing scenarios that are portrayed would be just simulations. Our imaginations can be captured, but not at the expense of living creatures.

However, this was filmed in 1986. No CGI existed and the footage used is real world. That means an actual cat was placed in a box and hurtled down a waterfall. An actual pug was drowned in a stream during a physical confrontation with a bear.

This is just a few of the horrible things that numerous animals went through during filming.

The plot is fine for children, the scenery is beautiful. Even the narration is good for a laugh. But they're the only positives.

Animal welfare was concept completely alien to everyone involved in making this film. Look, I despise cancel culture and I typically scoff at reboots that pander to percieved cultural sensibilities.

But animal cruelty is never funny. No matter what era it occurred in.

So this movie is a perfect candidate for an overhaul, Use CGI or whatever. Just don't use real animals for scenes where danger is imminent.
45 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A truly lovely children's tale; brims with magic, beauty and adventure
ackstasis12 July 2007
As a young boy, I had an almost-obsessive love of animals and adventure, and so it should come as no surprise that 'The Adventures of Milo and Otis' was one of my all-time favourite childhood films. Unfortunately, the battered and overused VHS tape on which I had initially watched the film had, for years, been tragically misplaced, and so I'd never had an opportunity to relive the joys and wonders of a film I'd loved for so long. Luckily, however, whilst browsing through a table of children's DVDs at a store, I happened upon this familiar title, and so I wasted no time in snatching it up and purchasing it. Time and maturity, it seems, has done little to dilute the absolute cinematic magic of this extraordinary film.

Originally a darker Japanese film entitled 'Koneko monogatari {A Kitten's Story / The Adventures of Chatran},' the extensive 400,000 feet of footage from one-time director Masanori Hata was taken by Columbia Pictures and completely changed, trimmed (from 90 to 76 minutes) and Westernised into the adorable children's tale of a cat named Milo and his canine best friend, Otis. Whilst the Japanese version – a huge box office success in its home country – had been narrated by Shigeru Tsuyuguchi, British comedy actor Dudley Moore helmed the American version, providing the voices for all the creatures in the film. Notably, 'The Adventures of Milo and Otis' doesn't contain a single human actor, though we certainly do see traces of human habitation, most noticeably in a train and in Milo and Otis' beloved farmhouse.

The film begins at the aforementioned farm, with a pregnant feline mother giving birth to a litter of cats in the upper floor of the barn. One young kitten, Milo, proves himself to be more adventurous and troublesome than his siblings, and an unexpected tumble from the barn loft sees him meeting a young pug puppy by the name of Otis. There is an oddly-touching moment when Otis announces himself to be not a cat, but a dog. Milo tentatively replies, "but... deep down inside, we're all cats, right?" Despite being of stereotypically opposing species, Milo and Otis form a life-long friendship, becoming the best of companions and accompanying each other on their numerous exciting adventures. One day, however, during their favourite game of hide-and-seek, Milo jumps into a wooden box beside the jetty, and it is suddenly swept downriver by the current. Otis, seeing his friend in distress, does his best to help, but he is not quick enough to prevent Milo from drifting further and further away from the farmhouse. As the uneasy cat begins to stray into scarily unfamiliar territory, he faces an array of difficult adversities – including a hungry bear, a flock of seagulls, a venomous snake and a cavernous pit – though he can always rely on the fact that his good pal Otis will always be in hot pursuit, despite his own share of potentially hazardous situations.

Contrary to what some have commentated, 'The Adventures of Milo and Otis' is most certainly a children's film at heart, with a wonderful message of dedication, loyalty and friendship. Perhaps some parents may feel tentative about the scene in which both Milo and Otis' female companions give birth to litters of youngsters; however, it's hardly graphic or obscene in any real way, successfully translating, I thought, the wonder of life and birth. The footage, which was filmed over four years, breathtakingly captures the splendour of the Japanese countryside, containing countless truly inspired moments of photography from cinematographers Hideo Fujii and Shinji Tomita. The lovely field of blossoms, where the kind-hearted doe teaches Milo to frolic, springs straight to mind as a particularly memorable moment. Additionally, adults should also enjoy the narration from Dudley Moore, whose gentle voice and subtle humour speaks to both kids and adults. There is also that infectious theme tune, "Walk Outside," written by Dick Tarrier and performed by Dan Crow.

It is unfortunate that a continuous spate of controversy has slightly tarnished this lovely film's name. It is not uncommon to come across completely unfounded claims that animals were tortured and even killed during the making of the film. After carrying out some research of my own, I can find absolutely no substantiated evidence to support these allegations, most of which were probably concocted based on a single viewing of the film. Indeed, there are moments during 'The Adventures of Milo and Otis' when our favourite animal characters appear to be in potentially dangerous situations. Rather than being evidence of clear cruelty, it would be more accurately described as clever film-making. It is often remarkable to realise how effectively carefully-chosen camera angles, quick cuts, slow-motion and trained animals can be used to create the illusion of mortal peril.

Additionally, the closing credits proclaim that "the animals used were filmed under strict supervision with the utmost concern for their handling." Though some have affirmed that these titles explicitly avoid the use of the term "no animals were harmed," I venture that this phrase was never of customary-use until after 1989, the year of the film's US release. Unfortunately, the American Humane Association has not issued an animal cruelty review for the film, which would have finally put an end to all the heated debate. Contrary to what some have stated, my humble research has discovered that director Masanori Hata was a respected zoologist who owned a private animal farm near Hokkaido. Also taking into account the large time-span over which 'Milo and Otis' was filmed (in many cases, Hata simply let his animal actors roam free and filmed their natural actions), it seems unlikely that such an animal-lover would allow any of his mammalian friends to come to harm. I regret that so much of my review has been dedicated to such a grim topic, since this is truly a remarkable children's movie, brimming with wonder and magic that is sure to inspire all who see it.
37 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fun trip down memory lane
cricketbat30 January 2021
I watched Milo & Otis a few times as a kid in school and really enjoyed it. And watching it as an adult was almost just as fun. I kept getting hit with waves of nostalgia as some lines were said or when certain music was playing. It's a slower movie. Even at only 1 hour and 15 minutes it drags a bit. However, my kids were just as enthralled with it as I was when I was their age. This was a fun trip down memory lane.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Insane amounts of Animal abuse Stop deluding yourselves folks.
afkmaniac28 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Every scene after the cat gets taken away in the box is visual proof of animal abuse. It doesn't take half a brain to realize the insane amount of terrible things done to these animal actors. From Bears fighting dogs and tormenting the kitten in the box to the box falling off multiple waterfalls jagged with rocks.

That doesn't even take the cake, the kitten is literally thrown off a cliff into jagged rocks below. If that doesn't prove to you that this is animal cruelty, watch the unedited Japanese version for true horror.

Ignoring the obvious facts to try and protect your favorite childhood movie will not make the cruelty that was done in this film go away. How this film was allowed into the US is absurd.

The fact that they say there's no evidence in cruelty is absurd when there's visual evidence in every scene. Humane really dropped the ball on this one Either that or they were bribed to ignore the obvious. Visual evidence speaks louder then any hearsay.
64 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Movie- Tragic Filming
lmeltzer3 May 2002
I originally looked up this movie on IMDB because something triggered my memory of this delightful movie. 25 now, I have not seen this movie in many years, so I was slightly surprised (Though I should not have been) when other viewers commented on the inhumane treatment of animals during the filming of this movie.

As an initial note- STOP COMPARING THESE ANIMALS TO STUNTMEN! Stuntmen and women have the free will and prerogative to perform in movies or not. Animals do not have the same choice. By virtue of the fact that animals can't drive themselves to auditions or to the movie set, it should be clear that OWNERS, not ANIMALS made the decisions to be in this and other movies. The comparison is inane.

I thoroughly enjoyed this movie as a young teen, but recognize now that the price undoubtedly paid by these animals was not worth 90 minutes of viewing enjoyment. If you choose to be entertained by a story of friendship between species, go to your local ASPCA and adopt a cat and a dog. The bond will be genuine, and the amusement value will last much longer than 90 minutes and you'll be promoting compassion to animals rather than abuse and mistreatment.
82 out of 109 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An absolute one of a kind, beautiful fable... I loved this film so very much as a child, but magic moments are now what I love the most about Otis and Milo...
Foreverisacastironmess12322 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I searched for this movie for a long time. Koneko Monagatari? We always just called it Otis and Milo! I loved this very much as a kid, but then it vanished on me and it was about 15 years before I was finally able to see it again. I fully expected to be hit by waves of sweetest nostalgia, but what I got was more of a cold shower. I found it very childish. I still liked it, but didn't love it as I once did. Of course, nothing's ever as good as you remember, but there are still glimmers and moments that give me the old magic feeling. It's visually gorgeous, you do see incredible scenes and situations totally unique to it involving various species of animals. Generally all cute. My favourite one is the scene with the cat and doe in the field of cotton blossoms. The aching purity of the scene is so warm and beautiful, it's like a dream, or a little piece of heaven... It was the one part of the movie that remained vividly etched in my mind long after I'd forgotten pretty much everything else. It's positively sacred to me. ::: I really don't care for ignorant types who try and make out that those who enjoy this film are condoning animal abuse or something. I'm not saying their points aren't very valid, but in this case I believe they are very overblown and unnecessary. And to the reviewer who said that parents should consider the "moral ramifications" before showing the film to their kids, I damn well disagree with you. I watched plenty of times when I was about 7 or 8 and it never made me want to do anything bad to any animals. I think that parents need only have that concern if it were people harming the animals in the picture. Everything scary that happens is portrayed as the natural peril of their journey. This movie's completely harmless. So I think all people like you need to just lay of the sweet little children's movie and lighten the hell up! I'm sorry, if any animals did get hurt, but I never saw this film that way before and I'm not going to start now. You people aren't gonna taint my memories of this film. I see beauty, innocence and hope. That's all I see. The only thing I really dislike is how much of a child's movie it really is. That, and Dudley Moore's damn ceaseless narration, he's really quite annoying! He's almost patronising. I don't think there are any big life lessons to be learned here, it's just a nice little picture for children, and really nothing more. If it has a big failing, that's it. I also hate that stupid song. ::: This movie has great sentimental value for me. To me sentimental value is when you don't particularly love something to death, but for whatever reason, you always want to know it's close by, and that's how I feel about this movie now. I thought one review was very sweet and apt in it's description of this-that of a bedtime story. Sweet precious little bedtime story that's very much worthy of remembering, and hopefully for its more positive and uplifting aspects.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tears of JOY
sc803125 June 2008
Apparently IMDb accidentally deleted my first review of this movie. Maybe the staff was too busy putting up more eye-damaging moving advertisements?! *sniffle*

The movie is amazingly charming, has a good voice-over by Dudley Moore, and features a bunch of insanely cute animals. You'll come away feeling like you were petting a kitty for 2 hours... or 75 minutes....

Also: the music is great! "Gonna Take a Walk Outside Today" is one of the best feel-good folk songs ever, up there with Raffi's rendition of "An Octopus' Garden"! And watch for the voice samples of "woofs" and "meows" used in the music during the rescue scene where Otis uses a rope. Hahaha -- ridiculously endearing!

The Adventures of Milo & Otis is truly spectacular. I do wonder about a couple of scenes in the movie, like where Milo leaps from a cliff into the ocean. That seemed as though it could've been... abuse? I really can't imagine the Japanese film-makers would kill a bunch of kitties for the sake of a kids' movie, though. That would just be sick...
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
cute, clever movie
rosaleen-218 June 1999
this movie is excellent, kids love it and it's fun for adults, too. the animals are adorable, and the narrator is perfect. i love the complete absence of humans throughout the movie. far preferable to other animal movies in which the animals talk (which is just an cheap way of getting around the communication problem in animal movies). instead of a slap-dash disney-type production, this is more like a storybook that someone has really taken the time to bring to life.
25 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This movie is great!
Woodland_Realm_Dweller6 September 2003
I have loved this movie since childhood. I have never seen the Japanese version, though I hear it is better. This is a movie about an orange tabby tom cat named Milo and a cream and black Pug named Otis. They grow up together, and while playing one day Milo gets swept away by the river. This is the story of their separate journeys to find each other, and the way home. I really enjoyed this movie, and would recommend it for the young and young at heart. This is a good kids movie because there is no violence, no five minute long makeout sessions, just good clean fun about two animal best friends and their adventures.
14 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cute real-life adventure type movie...
dwpollar26 September 2004
1st watched 9/26/2004 - 6 out of 10(Dir- Masanori Hata): Cute real-life adventure type movie with very funny and inventive narration by Dudley Moore. This is very similar to the Disney "Homeward Bound" series of movies except that each animal doesn't have it's own individual voice. All the voices are handled by one person, Mr. Moore. This works because of his ability to change his voice very effectively especially in one case where he does a female cat that you'd swear isn't him. Another difference is that this story lasts thru many seasons with the pup & kitten becoming mom & dad and having families. This is a very safe film that won't frighten younger viewers and teaches them a little about life, which is definitely a plus as well. The only real negative is the irritating and corny theme song, but if you can get thru this you'll enjoy the movie.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Animals are always cute, but hope such movies aren't made anymore
ComedyFan201020 May 2014
This is a movie about a great friendship of a kitten and a pug who are going on an adventure and try to make their way back to their home farm. It was filmed for 4 years an came out in 1986 in Japan.

This is mainly a movie for children, but anyone who loves animals will enjoy some scenes in it that have animal cuteness overload. I say "some scenes" because there is a huge number that are very disturbing. Now, I can't prove if indeed multiple cats and pugs were killed. It wouldn't surprise me considering the time it was filmed, animal rights were far less of an interest back then, and certain scenes like the kitten falling off a cliff sure seem to be life endangering. At the same time I heard the guy who produced this film was an animal lover who had an island that was a sort of sanctuary for animals. This of course doesn't prove much, we do know stories of animal support organizations that were guilty of killing animals or not giving them enough care, but it does give one some hope that animals didn't get killed. Still, even if we assume those are just rumors there are too many scenes where animals are in obvious distress. The one where the cat is attacked by seagulls is a great example. This ruined a movie a lot for me. I sure hope there has been a greater progress with animal treatment on the movie set. One ca make cute movies without doing this to animals and it is not worth the entertainment (it only ruins it).

But yes some adorable scenes such as the kitty with the piglets are in this movie as well.
26 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Precious overload
TheRaven838612 August 2015
Admittedly I am a bit biased since pugs are my favorite dogs in the world. This movie will make you lose count of how many times you go Awwww! Besides the puppy and the kitten as the stars you have a whole Menagerie of other animals from Bears to Hedgehogs and a lot of other baby animals as well. This is a movie you can enjoy at any age which makes it a perfect family film. As the title of this review says, it is a precious overload. It made me take my own pug and huger her extra tight. I highly recommend this to ages 3 to 100. You won't be disappointed with this story of two separated friend trying to find each other in the big world outside of the farm.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cute, Weird, And Possibly Tragic
AW_McGOWAN24 December 2020
Long after I enjoyed "The Adventures Of Milo & Otis" as a child, I was surprised to learn that this cat-and-dog comedy-adventure film is actually Japanese. Directed by zoologist Masanori Hata, the picture originally came out in Japan in 1986. Not until 1989 did Columbia Pictures adjust it for an English re-release, featuring a new script from "Sesame Street" veteran Mark Saltzman and a familiar narration from Dudley Moore.

"Milo & Otis'" Japanese origins surprised me so because the movie feels very Western. The episodic journey of "a curious cat and a pug-nosed pup" who flea from their farm to face the woes of winters and bears whilst mingling with foxes, deer, turtles, owls, and pigs, "Milo & Otis" could be a Disney movie, or something based off of a European children's book. Even the look of it - from its deciduous scenery to its multi-species cast - gives the impression that we are in pastoral areas of Britain or the Eastern United States rather than Asia... That is, based off of my American-bred schemas of how these places should appear.

Visually, the movie is humble. There are a couple game-winning wide shots, but most of the aesthetic appeal comes from close-ups of animals interacting with each other. Not a single human appears in the entire film, and Moore provides voices for all anthropomorphic characters. Because of this, we feel truly immersed in Milo and Otis' world, where small creatures' perspectives render the ordinary dangerous and wonderful.

That being said, something uncanny simultaneously lurks beneath the film's surface. As wondrous as the human-less atmosphere can be, it also takes away opportunities for identification. "Milo & Otis" can thus feel a little distant, as every character is just another iteration of Moore's voice. After a while, it becomes borderline surreal.

The surrealism only expands in the third act when the titular characters meet their mates, and Moore lends his voice to a white female cat named Joyce and a French female pug named Sandra. He continues voicing them as they bare Milo's kittens and Otis' puppies. The camera spares no images as these animals give birth onscreen. It's a tough sequence to watch as an adult. For the film's young target audience, it might be confusing, if not terrifying.

On the topic of terror, one cannot reflect on "Milo & Otis" without bringing up the allegations of animal abuse on set. The American Humane Society along with similar groups in Europe and Australia all accused the production of mistreating, intentionally wounding, and even killing members of its animal cast. A shot of Milo falling off a cliff and a scene of Otis tussling with a humungous black bear make it easy to believe that a few animals were definitely harmed in the making of this film.

Still, there is undeniable charm in the final product. Perhaps because of increased animal rights protections, we no longer see many movies featuring real animals as the main characters. Over the course of four years, Hata allegedly shot over seventy hours of footage, which he then edited down to the film we have. That is a degree of passion that few filmmakers have. If "Milo & Otis" were made today, it would certainly be an animated feature, and not have nearly the same effect.

"The Adventures Of Milo & Otis" might have a dark past, and a couple disturbing moments within the film, but we cannot deny that it is cinematically impressive and a relic of something bygone. For kids blind to the abuse claims and able block out the birth scene, it remains funny, cute, and (in a campy, subdued sort of way) jovially exciting!
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Drugs are bad, but this movie is worse.
ambrosejones-12 February 2011
Back in the early 90's a close friend of mine had the misfortune of seeing this movie while under the influence of psychedelics. He never recovered. I think it was the scene where the producers of the film threw a kitten off of a cliff that scarred him for life. How many takes did they do before they got it right? There were numerous allegations of animal cruelty made against the movie makers when the film was released. Including claims from crew members that 20 or so kittens were killed during the filming. Even if these aren't true, anyone watching the movie can see that these animals were mistreated. The scene where the kitten is being attacked by a swarm of seagulls, the kitten in the river, and of course the aforementioned cliff scene all show a heartless mistreatment of animals. I lost a lot of respect for Kon Ichikawa when i found out he was involved in the making of this piece of crap. I in no way endorse the use of illegal psychotropic drugs.
50 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A documentary of animal abuse
OpalCat20 May 2002
Sure, the end result was a very cute movie, but now that I am a parent I would never allow my son to see this film. Every scene includes some horrible thing done to the animal 'actors' in order to get a particular shot. Cats and dogs thrown off cliffs into ocean breakers, riding down whitewater rivers in a box, chased by predators, shaking and wet and caked in snow... it really is a nonstop montage of abusive scenes. The movie was filmed in Japan so it did NOT have the American standard of animal supervision, and it is interesting to note that the disclaimer at the end does NOT say that no animals were harmed.

I would never want my son to think that it was ok to treat animals this way, nor would I want to support the film industry in making films this way. The animals in this movie had no idea that it was all "just pretend" nor did they give consent. They probably thought they were about to die any number of times during the filming, and that is assuming that none did die, which I'm not too sure of.

I think it is important to consider the moral ramifications before viewing this movie or showing it to children.
113 out of 168 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed