In Self Defense (TV Movie 1987) Poster

(1987 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Decent TV movie
Leofwine_draca18 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Not a bad made-for-TV movie, certainly a lot better and with a lot more menace than many. The director shoots it like a feature film and although half of it is exposition with more than a few plodding scenes, the rest is decent. Billy Drago is a fantastic and frightening choice of villain and Yaphet Kotto a great choice to play the friend cop ally. Linda Purl's protagonist is feisty and strong enough to be worthwhile, and the whole thing has a grittiness that works in its favour.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
aka Hollow Point
petershelleyau30 October 2001
This TVM directed by Bruce Seth Green has a teleplay which presents the Los Angeles police and the court system ineffectual in the prosecution of criminals, and thereby supports the "Death Wish" vigilantism of the gun-lobby. However writers Robert Crais and David Peckinpah also support the police's stance on citizens owning guns with their claim that most guns are mishandled. The title is explained by a hole in the tip of a bullet which gives it greater striking power, and whilst this applies to the .32 automatic that Linda Purl obtains for self-protection from the attentions someone she has witnessed, it doesn't really double as an effective metaphor for Purl. The problem stems from her acting choice, where she plays her character as a woman with a small emotional range. Perhaps we are to take the cue from her reluctance to commit to her boyfriend who is conveniently absent as an airline pilot, her job where she works with children with developmental disorders, or her overuse of shoulder pads. Purl begins with sociopathic smiling, which soon gives way to Green indulging her in extended reactions, though thankfully her confrontation with Billy Drago as the bad guy has some flawed bravado. It's also probably no coincidence that Yaphet Kotto as the police detective towers over Purl, or that Kotto has a maniacal intensity as well as an odd haircut. The treatment features a security lock being installed (and approved by Kotto) that is easily opened by Drago, a cat after a bowl of Thai fighting fish, Purl having a double nightmare/hallucination, and also a funny edit from a man confidently defending Purl then a cut to him with a bloody nose. Drago has a subtextual relationship with his buddies that hardly seems to coincide with his interest in Purl, and which is represented by rock music.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Defend yourself! Don't bother seeing this!!
anxietyresister31 October 2004
Absolutely awful made-for-TV thriller with laughable performances and a cliché-ridden, predictable plot. Linda Purl plays a special-needs worker who sees a murderer, is invited to testify at his court day and then is put in serious danger after the case is dismissed. If the police in the USA are as useless as they are depicted in this movie, I'm surprised they manage to find the donut shop. Features possibly the most hairy husband in the world (and he likes to walk around with his shirt off, Yuck!) and a pet cat whose only possible inclusion must be to have been slaughtered by the bad guy as a warning to our heroine. Pathetic. Pass on this one, and go do something more interesting instead.. like cleaning round the U-bend. 0/10
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed