The Plague Dogs (1982) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
101 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
A tragic and moving tale
itamarscomix9 August 2005
Richard Adams's novel 'The Plague Dogs' always stood in the shadow of his superior masterpiece - the classic 'Watership Down'. The same goes for the animated films, both of them directed by Martin Rosen. The animated version of The Plague Dogs, released four years after the acclaimed Watership Down, never quite achieved the kind of success its predecessor had; not because it wasn't as good, but because of pretty much the same reasons for the novel's limited success. While Watership Down hid violence and severe social-political criticism behind a disguise of a children's tale, The Plague Dogs is much more in-your-face, much less subtle, and makes no attempts to hide itself behind pretty words. The Plague Dogs is a tragic tale that is mercilessly critical toward modern society, taking a strict stand on the subject of cruelty to animals. The idea of an animated film strictly for adults was as difficult to swallow twenty years ago as the idea of a novel for adults told from an animal's point of view. Therefore, movie-goers didn't quite know what to make of the film; it didn't seem right for an adult to go watch an animated film about animals - and a parent who takes his little child to this film would face an even bigger problem of explaining to them why the bad people do such horrible things to the poor dogs.

Fortunately, today we know that animation isn't just for kids, and we can fully appreciate this masterpiece. The story is that of two laboratory dogs, voiced brilliantly by John Hurt and Christopher Benjamin, who escape from their cages and from the lab seeking the freedom of the outside world, and finding out that surviving in the wilderness isn't as easy as that. The scientists have reason to believe that the dogs contacted a bubonic plague virus during their escape, and so the two must run for their lives and fight for survival. Most of the film is from the dogs' point of view (they are later joined by a fox, voiced by James Bolam, who helps them survive in the wild, not without his own reasons). On the other hand we also hear the humans' conversations, yet we never see a human being's face; Rosen doesn't allow us to sympathize or identify with any of the human characters. The animals are clearly the more humane here, and that's the basis of what Rosen and Adams say here.

Be warned - don't let the animation fool you, this is not an easy watch. The violence in The Plague Dogs is more explicit than in most live action films, and the message it bears about human beings as a whole is difficult to swallow. John Hurt's performance as Snitter, alternately funny and sad, dominates the film, and it makes for one of the most beautiful and round animated characters ever seen on film. The story, especially that of Snitter's, is incredibly sad and touching, and is more powerful emotionally than any other animated feature I've seen. A highly recommended film, and not just for animation enthusiasts.
43 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Depressing, but impressive
zetes19 March 2007
A forgotten animated film directed by the man who made Watership Down in 1978, and also adapted from a novel by the same author who wrote it, Richard Adams. Watership Down is famously not for small kids, although it's smart and good for older children. The Plague Dogs, on the other hand, is so relentlessly bleak that it makes Watership Down look like The Rescuers Down Under. You might call it All Dogs Go to Heaven, but Only After They've Been Through Hell. That's not to disparage it, but just to paint the mood. The story follows two dogs who escape from a government lab where they've been cruelly experimented upon. The film opens with one of the two protagonists, Rowf, struggling to stay afloat in a giant tank of water as two researchers take notes. We watch the poor lab sink to the bottom of the tank, drowned. The scientists pull him out and revive him. The second protagonist, Snitter, has had experimental brain surgery performed on him, and he has trouble distinguishing fantasy from reality. After the two escape, they forage the rather bare countryside for food. Finding little, they end up going after sheep. This puts the local farmers on the defensive, and they begin to hunt the two down like, well, dogs. When the laboratory releases information that the dogs may also be carrying bubonic plague, the military is called in to get rid of them. It's an extremely difficult movie to watch, especially if you love animals. A lot of people will be turned off because there is just no hope to be had. We know there is no real escape for the two. There's also constant talk about death between them, and how it might be better. It's dark as hell, and you should only show it to children if you want to give them nightmares or screw them up. Personally, I was deeply moved by the film and highly recommend it. Too bad Rosen didn't produce anything other animated films besides this and Watership Down. Both are beautifully animated (well, the animation is a little bit choppy in The Plague Dogs, but the drawings themselves are gorgeous), and he tells stories well. Supposedly this movie is a lot more solid than the original novel.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Some minor spoilers
Larry_the_flan1 May 2004
Warning: Spoilers
This is an excellent animation, the second to be produced by Nepenthe following from 1978's "Watership Down". Although I prefer Watership Down, The Plague Dogs is certainly darker and more distressing/despairing/depressing, hence the PG rating (rather than Watership's U). Like Watership Down, Plague Dogs was written by Richard Adams, his statement against the horrors of vivisection.

The story follows Rowf and Snitter, two dogs who escape from an animal research laboratory (just outside the Lakeland village of Coniston), and their attempts to evade capture, at first by farmers for killing sheep, and later by soldiers for reasons more sinister.

By today's standards the animation does not look at all smooth - though I prefer this handmade quality, and I also appreciate the synthesised soundtrack, though it lapses into silliness at times. What sticks in the memory are the horrible things that continue to happen after Rowf and Snitter escape the lab, and how the animation comes to capture this. It is unusual to see animation being used to depict the horrible (being as I for one normally see it used for more saccharin Disneyesque purposes), but it works, just as Watership Down did. (Spoiler, next sentence) One particular scene of a shotgun accident works very well, in fact.

The fact that it works well shouldn't stop this film being shown to children, that is to say: those who are old/mature enough to move on from the sentimentality of Disney et- al (bearing in mind its PG status). It could never be described as anything like sentimental. In fact, it starkly narrates our hopelessly backward thinking on life, and our senseless, thoughtless actions to its detriment. The fact that it narrated our heartless idiocy may have contributed to the film's poor takings, despite an excellent cast.

For a film that did not perform well at the box office, there are a surprising number of copies available: on DVD versions have been published by Anchor Bay and "Hollywood DVD" (Air Media), I own the latter which is Region 0 (all PAL regions)... and it's the worst encoding I've ever seen on a DVD! From other reviews I'm told the Anchor Bay version is little better, and both versions are truncated. I regard my copy as a stopgap until the original full length 1982 version is released, rather than the 1984 cut. It was however, the cheapest DVD I've ever brought at £1.49.

Nonetheless, it's extraordinary that a film of this calibre should have become so forgotten, and I strongly recommend it (even the badly mastered edited editions).



For the fact fans among you:

"Nepenthe": Mentioned in Homer's Odyssey, is an ancient Egyptian drug for the relief of melancholia.

Coniston, the location of the animal research station, actually exists... though to the best of my knowledge there has never been an animal research station in or near the village. The village is in the Lake District National Park, Cumbria (North-West of England)

(Spoiler) The original book had a happy (or at least happier) ending.

The original book had illustrations by Alfred Wainwright!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
There isn't any island...
Snufkin3 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
A long time ago on now 'pay-only' forums, I used to discuss animation...I don't recall discussing plague dogs (though Watership Down was discussed at length), though now having seen the film a few times, I realize that this is in so many ways a theoretical example of what animation could be. Had I not actually seen Plague Dogs, I would have gathered no film like this actually existed. Perhaps it's something like the researchers who first discovered the naked mole rat, finding something that in all probability shouldn't exist, but seems--at least theoretically--possible. Plague Dogs is an animated film simply telling a great story without a single limitation placed upon it because it belongs to a genre. For this very reason, it has never been reissued in the US so if you want to see it, it might be worthwhile investing in a region free VCR that plays PAL. I've never read the book, but the film takes a stance that would be difficult were it done as an animated film, live action or any other possible way. In the end, I'm not sure it matters whether it is about animals or not. Hope persists in bleakness, memories (love and loyalty) outweigh the present, and innocence is shattered by a world more bitter than a dozen R rated movies. Dumbo perhaps perceived the world given to us in Plague Dogs, but finds an all too easy solution. Plague Dogs has no solution other than to live...even in death. The balance between the two strong dog personalities is perfect. Rowf is both a hardened cynic, yet his spirit and willingness to fight carries the film. Snitter, who strangely leads the duo, is idealistic, yet emotionally and psychologically crippled. But strangely, I'm reminded of Aldous Huxley who once said that in a world of insanity, perhaps those who are crazy are the most sane. Snitter's remarks, though clearly irrational often feel more right than the actual choices left to the poor dogs. When Snitter settles in his old home next to the fire (all an illusion), one really wishes he could stay there. These delusional episodes are often aimed right at the heart. Snitter is an immediately sympathetic character who makes his point from the beginning of the film: to find a new master. Snitter knows his persuers are not masters, he in fact defends masters to the very end. It is a crippling blow to anyone who's loved an animal, has children, or had any other responsibility to the innocent. There's no one there to tell Snitter that masters and man are the same. That those who hunt him would probably just as readily give him a home. It's fate that's put him on this road and there's no way out. As much as Watership Down is a good film, Plague Dogs is a great film. A once in a decade film. Perhaps the only thing like it is Grave of Fireflies. I can't think of a single western animated film that comes close except perhaps those early wild wanderings by Walt when he still believed that 'love is a song that never ends' and that animation could be a medium for everyone. Haha! Like that once, now abandoned hope, snitter's last line cries out 'there isn't any island!' Plague Dogs is just that fleeting hope, now crushed, never to be repeated in cinema. Miyazaki may perhaps give animation a grand treatment that is well deserved, yet even Mononoke is not so brave as to do what Plague Dogs did. A Wonderful yet tragic film for so many reasons.
100 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Tragic
the_naked_airplane17 November 2004
Martin Rosen's second animated film is a powerful piece, which is based on Richard Adams novel of the same name. The Plague Dogs is a very rare example of a film in the animation genre which strives for realism in the grittiest of senses. As far away from fluffy Disney films as one could imagine, this is a disturbing account of the hardships of two dogs who escape from an animal testing lab. The perceived haven of the real world soon turns out to be anything like Rowf and Snitter had hoped. However the friendship that is built through out the film between the two dogs and a rogue fox whom they meet, is touching and at times heartbreaking. To delve much further into the story would be to spoil certain aspects of the film, so that shall be left down to the viewer to discover.

Suffice to say, the main strength of Plague Dogs is paradoxically the reason the film has found itself in obscurity. To this date the original, 'uncut', version has not been released on any small screen formats (not to my knowledge at least). This strength is the bravery with which Rosen tackles the story. Resulting from this is a down beat film that isn't suitable for, nor is it likely to interest most, children. This is more than likely the reason it never found the success of Rosen's previous feature, Watership Down.

In short, this film deserves to be released in its full splendor and embraced by a whole new generation of film lovers. Anyone with a heart that isn't made of stone will get the appeal of this wonderful film.
77 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I hugged my puppy
fox_tabatha13 April 2005
A perfect film. Strong characters, wonderful animation; a rarity. It manages to be real; it actually CAPTURES the totality of its components without catering to any audience.

It's a difficult film to watch. You suffer alongside, vicariously. The hardships portrayed here are viciously painful. You'll hug your pets tight and be glad they wound up as your pets.

This movie is very special - considering the content, it could have easily been pandering and preachy. It manages to go so far beyond anything you've ever experienced. It's quite an achievement on every level.

It won't leave you happy, but it will affect you permanently. It is emotional, but never manipulative. It's a tragic and unrecognized masterpiece.
88 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Overall, preferable to the book
cherold21 September 2010
The Plague Dogs is impressively animated (especially in the opening scenes) and, for a cartoon, remarkably downbeat.

While the book suffered from a "tell, don't show" attitude, spending much of its time in an impassioned and sometimes overwrought critique of animal experimentation (perhaps justified; the horrific and generally ludicrous experiments in the book were apparently based on actual horrific and ludicrous animal experiments), the movie is content to show you what happens and let you be horrified on your own. People are wisely pushed as far out of the movie as possible, allowing it to be focused almost entirely on the animal protagonists.

Sadly, the best thing about the book, Snitter's extreme confusion between fantasy and reality, and his poetic way of speaking, have been almost entirely lost in the movie. The book's description of Snitter's experience in the shed is far more surreal than what you get in the movie.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The film noir of animated features.
budmassey11 March 2001
Don't even think about showing this one to the kiddies. It's about two abused lab animals that escape only to find that the experiments that have been conducted on them leave them unfit to survive in the wild. Their desperate flight for survival leads them through a series of cruelties, heaped upon their lives already made wretched by torturous and seemingly unnecessary experimentation, that culminate in one of the most moving moments in the history of animation.

I've always thought that animation could be more than an after-market money-machine vehicle for creating cloyingly sweet garbage for which actors can earn voice-over money without having to be too closely associated with the work. And yes, that's what I think most animated features are.

But not this one.

Animation is a way of depicting what cannot be shown in live action films. In this case, we explore the tragedy of animal abuse in a way that will never let you forget what a crime it really is. Plague Dogs is insightful, brutally honest, and unflinchingly direct in exposing the gruesome truth about animal research. This is one of the greatest animated films ever made. I cannot recommend it highly enough.
94 out of 103 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tragic tale
ilikesilversparkles11 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I'm not sure this is a film I would watch again, but I think Richard Adams really succeeded in his aim to get people thinking about the awful animal testing that was going on around that time.

As a big fan of Watership Down, although that was an intense story, this rather has just one aim in its mission to highlight the atrocities of how we have treated animals.

*****Spoilers******

The ending differs from that of the book slightly however I sense in both cases Mr Adams actually intends thé pair not to survive. The island they speak of most likely being the Isle of Man is 47 miles from the beach they set off from so it's unlikely they ever would make it. I think it's a real shame it couldn't have a bitter sweet ending like Watership down but I feel this was on purpose because may of the animals we have mistreated never have a happy ending and that's really what the point of the film is about.

Really good movie in terms of its aim, but not a happy story so I'll probably just leave it at that.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superior to Hollywood blockbusters in every way.
catalyst8-125 April 2008
A beautifully melancholy and poignant story about companionship, loyalty, and hope. An incredibly strong cast (including the classically trained John Hurt and Patrick Stewart) give this excellently scripted tale a fully believable life of its own, more vivid and heartfelt than the majority of blockbuster Hollywood movies you're likely to see this year (or any other for that matter). If the fact that this is an animation puts you off, do yourself a favour and don't let it. Once the narrative is under way I defy anyone to find the animation detrimental to the experience.

Certainly in regards to the genre of animated films this is superior to anything Disney have ever done, both in respect of visual and intellectual content, and stands alone as a benchmark of what can be achieved in the genre.

From the creators of 'Watership Down', this film shares the same author and production company, but despite its PG certificate you should be warned that some scenes may be upsetting, not specifically for younger viewers but for everyone - this is a genuine tear-jerker of a film.

Highly recommended. If you don't watch it you are doing yourself a disservice.
27 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Epic story
lorddrewsus6 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is one screwed up movie (about facing your fears?). Those poor dogs. That poor fox. Nature is cruel, that's for sure. Some allegory about how we are just as screwed? I don't know, the story itself is great. Hand drawn epic-ness. I did cuddle my cat after. He's as big as a dog, anyway. I do hope they made it, where ever they were headed.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An underrated and regrettably, obscure gem...
petenpea27 February 2006
As the plot synopsis has been covered in sufficient detail by many previous comments, I instead offer this comment as a humble plea to film and animation enthusiasts, such that they may actively seek out this criminally underrated and genuinely affecting animated drama. My hope would be that sufficient renewed interest in this successor to "Watership Down" might provide the impetus for a well-deserved North American reissue of the film in it's uncut version.(An uncut, 99 minute Region 4 PAL disc is now available online through import sites, while the only available Region 1 NTSC versions are of the 82 minute edit). The voicing of the two principle characters, the Smooth Terrier "Snitter" and the noble Labrador "Rowf", is nothing short of brilliant, with John Hurt providing an especially poignant turn as Snitter, whose brain has been tampered with at the research facility, thereby confusing his perception of objective/ subjective realities. There is a powerful message and some timely social commentary to be had here, though the film wisely refrains from overt didacticism and sentimentality. As fate would have it, the film will now stand as one of the last animated features to have been entirely hand colored (to great effect, I might add). At once powerful, haunting and emotionally draining, this film is surely not to be forgotten once viewed (example: many previous comments having mentioned the author retaining vivid recollections of the film from childhoods far removed). I implore you, please seek out a copy (cut or uncut) and view it with those closest to you. Discuss it with your friends, your children and fellow film enthusiasts. Let's not allow this masterwork to languish and slip into further obscurity.

"I'm inside my head now. And it's where I should be... I can't come out. If I do, I'll go mad again" - Snitter
51 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Is the Glass Half Full or Empty?
verseczy13 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
After watching the extended version + the end of the cut version, let me start from the end. It is same (or very slightly different) and neither distinctively suggesting that the dogs die or live, rather leaving You as a viewer to create the finish to this feature, and if I may say does it in very thoughtful way not to tip the balance leaving it open for interpretation, because You not going to see the dogs lifeless bodies float in the water, nor they reaching the shores of the island. Optimist will look at it as they didn't die, there is always hope in the life no matter how bad it is, and we will do whatever is necessary to survive. View of the pessimist is of course that the dogs died, the life sucks, and fight for life is fruitless. The fact that so many viewers are obsess to argue the end one way or the other must be the biggest disappointment to the creators of this film, because the end is as it is, only for the reason: It's not important!

Watch the movie for all the great messages it delivers throughout the story.

The dogs, who are victims in this film also do crimes even if it was accidentally or by the circumstance. Same goes for the people who are looking for them, they are not viciously hunting them but rather they are hunting the dogs that are threat to people and life stock. Contains fine dramatization of friendship and the sacrifices true friend do for each other. Definitely will make You think and have opinion.

The film has melancholic overtones, it drags at times, and there are shortcomings from technical aspects such as: lack of underlying music which is painfully missing in some parts.

6.5 out of 10
7 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Easy To See Why It Wasn't An International Hit
Theo Robertson3 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
WATERSHIP DOWN is a classic animated feature film . It confounds expectation in that it's not some mawkish , childish cartoon and it's a compelling and sometimes frightening drama that stays in your mind long after you've seen it . I did know the production team behind WATERSHIP DOWN did a follow up film in 1982 called THE PLAGUE DOGS but it's a very obscure film that as far as I know has never been broadcast on network television and hasn't received a DVD release . Its obscurity isn't helped by the fact that there was no music tie in with the movie . Bright Eyes by Art Garfunkel might not be the greatest song ever written but at least it promoted the film in a way that a marketing campaign couldn't . Like me you could hate the song but love the film . Having just seen THE PLAGUE DOGS via the internet it would have taken more than the greatest song ever written to market this film

The problem lies in the fact that it's a film that will have a very limited market which leaves you wondering what sort of audience it's made for . From the opening sequence where Labrador Rowf comes very close to drowning in a vivisection lab you're aware this is going to be a bleak , depressing film not for children thereby neutralizing an important demographic of a cinema audience . Despite being dark and intelligent children could still enjoy WATERSHIP DOWN but not this because it's as child friendly as a film about a nuclear holocaust and the sometimes gritty language doesn't help the cause . There's other aspects too that makes it a difficult film to market and that is the regional accents which will be impossible for an international audience to understand such as James Bolam's Geordie accent . On top of that being an animated film a lot of the potential audience will have the slightly prejudiced and ignorant mind set of " Oh it's a cartoon therefore it's just for kids " . I suppose the marketing campaign would have been limited to " If you loved WATERSHIP DOWN then you might like THE PLAGUE DOGS "

Unfortunately as much as I loved WATERSHIP DOWN I didn't like THE PLAGUE DOGS . Much of this might be down to the fact that I felt the film was pursuing an anti-vivisection agenda . I'm not going to get into the rights and wrongs of vivisection but much of the film screams " Four legs good . Two legs bad " .and my patience was tested due to the manipulative story telling of fluffy mammals being pursued by bad , cruel humans .A film should never have to show two sides to anything because that would be silly but if you don't agree with a film's message you realise how difficult it is to like the film that's delivering it As a footnote to the narrative it's interesting that while I thought WATERSHIP DOWN influenced Alex Garland's screenplay for 28 DAYS LATER this follow up reinforced my belief since both film's start in a vivisection lab and leads to the escape of a potentially fatal disease

It's easy to see why THE PLAGUE DOGS didn't make the same commercial impact as its predecessor . Due to its content it's a film that works against being a commercial hit which is a pity because it contains superb animation along with the wonderful rich voices of its cast
22 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Probably one of the best animated movies ever made..
rugbyspelaren-212 January 2002
As everyone else has already said - this is not a movie for kids,at least they should watch it with an adult.

I first saw it at the cinema maybe 19-20 years ago and it has never left my mind.I remember crying in the end of the movie and when I hear "time and tide" it still makes me cry.

It is very well made yet disturbing and as said before it has nothing in compare with Disneys animated musicals. There is nothing funny in this movie.Nothing to laugh at and it makes you feel very sad and depressed and ashamed of being a human.

It is very sad that most people have never ever heard of it.It deserves a far better destiny than to just fade away in to the past.

The only animated movies I can think of that is almost as touching (but still far from) as "Plague dogs",is perhaps Watership Down,Secret of NIHM,An American tail and Grave of the fireflies.

I really hope that animators nowadays could watch Plague dogs and get some inspiration.Disneymovies are nice but they are far to sentimental in my opinion.

Thats just one of the great things about Plague dogs - Its dark,grim and depressive but it NEVER EVER gets sentimental.

Why cant anybody re-release it on VHS and DVD?

"Memories is only about the past,the present time will never last, the future lies within your heart.I left this cruel world behind and I found my peace of mind.I don't feel no pain no more..."
46 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Heartwrenching
John-Searle21 July 2003
I have never been a fan of anthropomorphism in film. Talking animals bug me. Most Disney work is likeable fluff with little substance and loads of Hollywood phoneyness. These aforementioned films are formulaic and frankly rather drab. But the Plague Dogs...the Plague dogs is an exception. The story of two infected dogs who escape from a containment facility is the most heart wrenching story I think I have read, and the film recreates that world perfectly. It is not that there is a bleeding heart liberal inside of me and I would stress that I am not a member of PETA. utr this film hurts. What makes this film hurt so damned much is that there is no option for the characters. You love them immediately for their innocence and nobility. You feel for them because they have no ability even if freed to make anything of their freedom. The dogs are our children. And the world they exist in, is our world, one we have allowed to stand. The Plague Dogs creates a world where the finest of our emotions falls short of saving the day. It creates a world where good things lose and die and bad things remain in control of the world, where friendship can fail, and even the trickster loses...and yet...the beauty of the story is how the best of our emotions, even though they will not neccessarily win the day, can make an ending bearable. Though this ending left me drained and hollow. This movie has the ability to shatter a viewer.
69 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
When can all animated features be this great?
krytensyxx10 June 2002
I first saw Plague Dogs when I was about 4 years old, right after I first saw Watership Down. I did not understand much of the film then, but now I do. This movie is not about happy endings, zesty lines, or colorful musical scenes. This is about the hardships of life and the ever growing errors of man's interuption in the animal kingdom. You will walk away depressed, but at the same time be more aware of how important respect towards animals is. If possible buy or rent this movie as soon as you see it. I do not believe it has ever been re-released in any form. The acting and direction feels very much like a live action film. Many things about Plague Dogs will stick in your mind for years.
27 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Right Kind of Dreary
DonaldDooD17 September 2014
Usually I don't like films like this. Plague Dogs feels long, slow, drab, and arguably melodramatic. Its not excellent in character, and it doesn't seem to have a particular message. But The Plague Dogs works for me. And it has to come down to the animation.

The animation looks good for the time, but more importantly, its barren, and uses faded colors - light blues, greens, and grays. The artists make modern England look like its in post-apocalypse. Yeah, there are humans around, but, from these dog's perspective, its a scary, lonely place.

Plague Dogs is near hopeless, and honestly has some of the more screwed up scenes I've seen in animation. There's not much else to say about it. If you're in the right mood, its an emotional experience. Can't say I love it, but it stuck with me longer than most movies.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
if Cormac McCarthy were British and made an animated movie with dogs, it might be this
Quinoa198425 May 2009
Martin Rosen didn't make any concessions with The Plague Dogs, even more-so, arguably, than Watership Down. While making a serious animated film about rabbits might sound like more of a challenge, and is a great film, I would be more inclined to people I know for them to watch The Plague Dogs to see how truly brutal Rosen could be as a filmmaker.

Adapting from a book by Richard Adams, who also wrote Watership, this is a movie that a kid might be inclined to see right away just by the picture of dogs running around on the front cover - some may not understand the word 'Plague' and even if they do they'll want to see it anyway... That is, if they can find it, as it is not very widely available. But for parents, it has to be indicated what this film is: this is dark and gloomy and with an ending that is at best ambiguous and at worst so sad that it will make your kids' reaction to Bambi or the Lion King look like a scraped knee. It will f*** them up emotionally.

And yet it will, too, for the adults seeing it. This is not a perfect animated film but it is one of the most gut-wrenching and opposite-of-heartwarming you may ever come across, animated or otherwise. It's about two dogs who are subjected to vicious psychological and physical treatment (think that one brief scene in Secret of Nimh only not brief and with dogs instead of mice) and somehow escape the facility and go on the run. They scrounge for food, finding very little, getting some limited help from a mischievous fox. But one of the dogs, voiced by John Hurt, has a scar where the surgeons operated on his brain at the clinic - he can't distinguish objective and subjective, and if he's in a room for any long length of time colors change. Then after an accidental death, the dogs are even further pursued, this time claimed by the humans in the area to be infected with the Black Plague.

If it doesn't sound happy it doesn't look it either. The film's ultimate purpose is about hope, the lack of it, where it becomes nil quicker and quicker as innocent figures are cast aside and hunted down. While there's been some criticism that the film (or the book for that matter) may have some "statement" about animal cruelty or testing, it never really stuck out for me. I was so wrapped up in the story, the nature of the horrific dynamic that these two dogs were in, that I had little time to really put a lot of thought into the issues. Indeed, this is sparse in terms of characterization, though rich in detail as the dogs go along these black and gray mountains, the rubble around, the snow falling all around. There's not one sunny day around (then again it is England), and as their circumstances get worse, and the odds grow thinner, our attachment peaks at a point - and it goes over it in the last five minutes with an ending that would leave the toughest Clint Eastwood wannabe sobbing for dear life.

But as with, for example, Grave of the Fireflies, or in literary comparison Cormac McCarthy's The Road, whatever is heartbreaking is earned by the artistry, the commitment to making this a dark, mortifying hurdle through existence. Not all of the animation syncs up completely (albeit this may be sour grapes as I have only seen the 82 minute severely censored version that may have cleared up a couple of gaps- as far as I could tell it wasn't a flaw on Rosen's part), but everything in terms of atmosphere, or provoking a certain place of dread brought about when humanity is at its worst, and dogs at their most vulnerable, that you can't help but be moved. Hell, we even get one of Hurt's best performances, voicing a bi-polar dog who should already be dead or past the point of no return, and at one point even asks for it in a moment that had me floored (the bit about not having to worry about eating if one is dead).

The Plague Dogs isn't a 'for-everyone' animated adventure - for the love of all that is sacred do NOT show it to your dog-loving first-date - but it's entirely successful, and criminally underrated, as a mature work of art, a precisely sorrowful story that should appeal to anyone looking for a good, warranted cry and a look at dogs that is the sort of clear version of some diluted movie made at the same time like The Fox and the Hound. A+
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Plague Dogs
jfgibson737 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I can't even decide how I feel about this movie. I think part of that is because I didn't connect with the characters the way I did with Watership Down. I guess I wanted more of the same. And while Plague Dogs does have a lot of similarities with WD, it just didn't capture my fascination in the same way. It makes me question what I consider to be entertainment--how can I be enjoying something that shows such terrible things? This is a bleak as it gets--you really want the characters' suffering to end so badly that you almost hope they are put out of their misery. But I guess that is part of the appeal for some viewers, who agree that terrible things happen in the real world, and that this movie is just reflecting that. I liked the experience of reading the book more than watching the movie, because in the movie it often feels like the dogs are just going from place to place, while in the book, you really get a sense of how many close calls they make it out of. It definitely made me feel something, and those emotions are conflicted.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
brilliant
fuchsia-rose9 April 2004
simply the best animated film i have seen.nemo's great but this one hits you in places others won't and probably never will again..i watched this back in the early 80's and never forgot it..its great that it has been released on dvd as i have been after it for years..for all those who have not seen it i recommend you to see it as it will always stay with you..its not your average kids animated movie and many were shocked when it was first released..there is one particlar gory scene with a farmer and a shotgun, say no more don't want to spoil it..and this scene could not have been animated and script better...beats watership down every time! I have never been so moved as i have with this film..
35 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Slowly paced but great backgrounds, character designs and voice acting nonetheless
Stompgal_8730 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I watched 'The Plague Dogs' for the first time today on LoveFilm Instant because I love dogs. I didn't even know this film existed until 31 years after it was made, but I decided to give it a go anyway.

As I mentioned in the title/summary of this review, the most positive aspects are the realistic backgrounds, true-to-life character designs (especially the animals) and the voice acting. The negative points of this film are its slow pace throughout, some disturbing scenes (such as a dead slightly balding dog being burnt in an incinerator and sights of a dead bloody sheep and lifeless chickens) and some of the animation being as slow as the film's pace. The camera movement was sometimes rough and choppy as well. As for the music, the beginning and ending songs were a treat to the ears and the background music was sparse yet chilling. The story was somewhat hard to understand, but I liked the chemistry between the two leading dogs Snitter and Rowf (whose name I thought was spelt 'Ralph' because they're similarly pronounced). When I first saw The Tod's eyes shine in darkness, I thought he was an owl but he is, in fact, a fox. I did find his name rather unoriginal because there is already an animated fox named Tod in Disney's 'The Fox and the Hound.' I also feel this film is a tad intense for a PG in the UK due to its disturbing scenes, language and sights of blood. It should be rated a 12 at the very least.

All in all, this was a decent if slowly-paced film that had its artistry and voice work as its redeeming merits. 7/10.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Tough for dog lovers!!!
velcrocandy5 May 2011
This movie had been recommended to me because I had watched "Watership Down" years ago, and I found it very interesting and unlike any other animated movie. I was told that "The Plague Dogs" was similar in make, so I thought I would give it a try. This gave me the same eerie feel, but it kept me on my toes, almost like a suspense film. I have never seen a film so accurately display dog's behaviors AND personify them... Instead of just talking dogs, I felt as if I was just given a translation of what they would have really been saying if they COULD talk. This made the movie feel so real to me, I connected with the characters and this movie was simply a pleasure to look at. The realistic environments, the glistening coats of the dogs, even the water trickling down the stream was a relief from most modern animation.

I am not one to cry when I watch movies. This movie made me sob and sob, in the beginning I cried, and in the end I cried. Like I said in my summary: it's definitely tough for dog lovers to watch!!! I would highly recommend this movie, however it is not for kids 16 and under. If you think you'd like to watch it with your family, the parental guidance on this site is incredibly helpful for this, and for any movie on here. 10/10 in my opinion!! What a great movie!!
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Our Society Isn't Better At All.
DarkSpotOn14 April 2022
Sad at times movie about two puppies that manage to escape the place where experiments are being done on them. They become friends with this fox on their way, they try to get adopted but fail. Along with the foxy, they are attacking and eating sheep to survive. As the film progresses more and more of humanity wants to hunt them down, which all leads to them seeing the island as they are swimming towards it inside of the sea. Very well movie that is repetitive at times, and a bit slow. However, the film is still good and it reflects on our society to this day.

Somebody said that this is more depressing than Grave of the Fireflies. I'll say it right now, this film is nowhere near as depressing as Grave of the Fireflies. I did not tear up at all watching this movie, while I was crying a fountain when watching Fireflies. So heads-up, this film is not in the same boat as Fireflies.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Brave Effort, but...
danielemerson4 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is a damn good attempt to make a feature film out of my favourite Richard Adams book.

The problem with the book is that some of the digressions into politics and journalism are just a bit too long and self-indulgent, which disrupts the flow of the story. I'd certainly have edited down Digby Driver's part to something still vital to the plot, but more concise and direct.

This animated adaptation cuts out the worst excesses of those digressions, but cuts too much else as well, in my opinion. The character-establishing story of Snitter's former master and his sister is virtually excised, for instance. The ending stops short of the original, leaving it ambiguous and darker. In addition, some of the animation makes the animals' movements look a little unnatural.

Like 'Watership Down', they have employed a starry British cast of voice actors, and this is a great strength of this film. Overall, recommended, but be aware that, while parts of the original story are best discarded for narrative flow, some lost elements should have been left in.

I don't imagine anyone will be attempting a new version of 'The Plague Dogs' any time soon, so this more-than-worthy effort is a good primer for anyone wanting to read the book itself. Plus, for those who are distressed by the final act, the book has a much happier ending.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed