Cycle Vixens (1978) Poster

(1978)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Cruisin'....cruisin'...cruisin' down the road!
JohnSeal25 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
How can one adequately (or accurately) rate a film such as Cycle Vixens? Here is a film that defies all film-making conventions: at least 50% of this brief story is taken up with roadside shots of signposts--and fingers pointing at signposts. Filled with more visual and verbal non sequiturs than you might think possible in 71 minutes, Cycle Vixens is both one of the worst films ever made, and one of the most compelling. One minute our heroic girls are tooling down the highway with the country-rock Cruisin' Down the Road blasting out of the soundtrack like a wayward outtake from Sweethearts of the Rodeo. Next minute they've been waylaid by a couple of seriously strung out junkies who somehow manage to tie up our clean-cut motorcycle mamas for a little roadside rape. Then the girls are back on their bikes, none the worse for wear. Cruisin' Down the Road is back in full force (the song plays an incredible FIVE TIMES during the course of the film) and Those Fingers are back to pointing at Those Roadsigns. Other reviews have mentioned the jaw dropping finale, which is truly remarkable and must be seen cold to be appreciated. Simitar's tape does seem to be cut--how else to explain some of the narrative lapses?--and kindly bleeps out all naughty words besides 'hell'. However, the good folks at Simitar had no trouble exposing us to frequent dissertations on the pleasures of getting high, not to mention that final scene...I guess heroin abuse is okay, but the word 'ass' is beyond the pale. I'll be first in line for the DVD.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very strange (and very 70's)mixture of feminism and exploitation
lazarillo29 August 2009
Three young girls living in a small Colorado town decide to take a trip on their motorbikes to California "to see the ocean". Two of the girls are sisters and go with the blessing of their widower father. The third has to sneak away from her strict parents. What follows is a long series of tragicomic misadventures. These "female hitchhiker" movies are one of my favorite 1970's exploitation genres(if they can really be called a "genre"). This is a little different in that the girls are on motorcycles rather than hitch-hiking, but otherwise this is in very much the same vein as movies like "Thumb-Tripping", "Girls on the Road", "Joyride to Nowhere", "The Hitchhikers", "Teenage Hitchhikers", etc. As in these other movie, there isn't so much a plot here as a random series of picaresque adventures.

This particular movie is really a confused mixture of feminism and exploitation. The girls get peeped on, molested, and even raped by about every guy they meet, but they also manage to stick together and eventually take revenge on all these loutish males. In some ways this very low-budget movie actually anticipates the later Hollywood blockbuster "Thelma and Louise". It's too low-budget and exploitative to quite be the feminist fantasy that movie was, but it's not entirely just a male fantasy either (despite the tight shorts and somewhat loose morals of the three protagonists). In a typical scene, for instance, two of the girls are rolling a number in a gas station bathroom when they see a male pervert spying on them, so they respond by flashing theirs breasts and asses at him (yeah, THAT'LL teach him). But after he (perhaps understandably) actually approaches them, they beat the hell out of him and run him off.

This movie definitely has its problems. It's even more low-budget than most of these type of films. The dialogue is very banal and the acting is atrocious. The single theme song gets very irritating and the end is both an egregious rip-off of a much more famous movie and is also very weak to boot. As an exploitation film it's pretty tame compared to some of the other "female hitchhiker" movies (like "Teenage Hitchhikers"),and it's definitely tame compared to many of co-director Bethel Buckalews other films (like "Sassy Sue" and "The Pigkeeper's Daughter"). Still, it's pretty unfair to criticize a low-budget movie simply for being low-budget. And while I'm not going to say it's technically a better movie than "Thelma and Louise", I find its confused message and its strange mixture of feminism and exploitation far more HONEST (with the exception of the crappy ending anyway) than that of the slicker, more "politically correct" Hollywood film.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Quite possibly the worst movie ever made
Chrissie10 April 1999
Warning: Spoilers
You know how some movies are so bad that you have to watch in fascinated horror? This isn't one of them. This one is so bad it takes an act of will to watch it at all.

Three teenage girls run away from home because they have become jaded by their lives, and their dream is to see the ocean in California. They set off on motorcycles. Bad stuff happens to them. Finally they make it to the California beach, but spoiler. As if it's possible to spoil something this abysmal.

As if to underscore the lameness of the writing and acting, we're also mistreated to scenes of the three girls randomly wigging the controls of their motorcycles like toddlers on a carnival ride. Would it have been too much trouble to at least teach them to keep their hands still on the throttle while cruising?

It might be fun to watch "Cycle Vixens" Mystery Science Theater style with a lot of friends under the influence of potent mind-altering substances, but I don't think even an acid trip could make this lame little item interesting.
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shoud be seen to define a zero point on a 1 to 10 scale.
caligula-2012 January 2007
Only gave it a 1 because there IS no zero on this scale.

I saw the movie on post at Fort Bliss in 1981, and I still can't get the horrible thing out of my head.

Pathetic acting, screen writing, directing, and continuity editing make this the quintessential icon for material that should never have been filmed.

Watch this movie once, and you'll never see another bad film again in your life.

For this reason and this reason alone, it is probably worth watching . . . ONCE.

Seeing it more often could be hazardous to your taste.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shockingly bad
betelguese_14 June 2003
This movie is what you would get if you crossed Easy Rider with Thelma and Louise, and had a 14-year old write the script. The ending is so odd that I sat in my bean bag frozen in awe of it's sheer lunacy. I only wish enough of you would see this movie to actually make the Worst Movie List, but doing so would probably double the total viewers who have ever seen this film.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The finest movie of its kind ever made!
RexMaynard27 December 2002
OK, there are those likely to pan this movie as intolerable and unwatchable. I'd like to point out that they've probably seen it on VHS released as "Cycle Vixens" (the original title was the more poignant "Young Cycle Girls".) In that case they are to be excused. The poor editing (I suspect the dub comes off of late night TV) ruins the true beauty of this film. No film demands the unedited, seen-at-a-drive-in experience quite like this one. Three young beauties living in suburban hell decide to throw caution to the wind and ride their cycles to California (beaches, boys and beer!). En route they encounter peeping toms - whom the girls at first happily grant a free look, then berate the dirty pervert (something they may regret later), corrupt cops, and junkie rapists. On the lighter side, they do have a blast at a 70's version of a water park, rock out to station 108 with groovy pot smoking teens, and have a laugh riot with Jerome and his morbidly obese girl. All the while the girls grow, both internally and externally. Although heartbreaking to watch them living in the cold, emotionally dead households they come from, you too shall be liberated with them as they open up like butterflies emerging from the cocoon while "cruisin down the road". The only reason to continue living for america's youth seems to be a glimpse of the pacific ocean, and these girls carry on their shoulders the hopes of America's 70's youth culture with great courage. Do they get to the promised land (or ocean)? Why do they regret mocking hulking semi-retarded perverts? Who is "cool Jinx" and is he really cool? I would tell you, but these are things you simply need to experience for yourself. If all you can find is the horrific, heavily edited VHS "Cycle Vixens", well you should watch it, but realize you're only catching the tip of the iceberg.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Super fun 70's drive-in romp
Woodyanders25 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Spunky Sheila, her equally perky sister Sherry, and their sheltered virginal pal Priss are a trio of bored thrill-seekers from Colorado who decide to embark on a cross country motorcycle trip to the California coast. During their eventful pilgrimage Priss gets raped, our trio have two of their bikes stolen, and they encounter a colorful assortment of folks on the side of the road such as a sassy fat black mama, a pervy cop, a sinister dope pusher and his hophead girlfriend, and even some sleazy peeping tom in a pick-up truck with a skull and crossbones painted on the side.

Directors John Arnoldy and Peter Perry Jr. keep the enjoyable episodic narrative zipping along at a snappy pace, astutely capture a delightfully breezy'n'easy carefree vibe (you'll have a hard time getting the jaunty country theme song "Cruisin' Down the Road" out of your head), and sprinkle in a satisfying smattering of tasty bare female skin for extra good trashy measure. Granted, Loraine Ferris, Daphne Lawrence, and Deborah Marcus may not be the most capable of actresses, but they nonetheless make for very attractive, appealing, and animated protagonists just the same. Ron Garcia's sunny cinematography offers a wealth of picturesque visuals. The surprise bummer ending packs a startling nihilistic punch. A real vintage 70's grindhouse cinema blast.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
As Good As Bad Gets!
First, look for the DVD "Young Cycle Girls", finally out there, and offering the unedited edition with the original title. This movie needs all its profanity and nudity restored. You won't regret buying this, it is an amazing experience. While it won't make IMDb's top 250 list anytime soon (a tragedy), it is every bit as much a rewarding experience to watch as any film made. The ending is the sort of shock ending M. Night Shyamalan tries to equal in his movies. the female liberation and bonding are what Thelma and Louise so awkwardly tried to portray. The acting is well... This movie should be seen under the influence, and with as many people as you can get to watch it with. There will be time for repeated viewings later to disseminate the movie itself. just enjoy the ride!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the worst... and one of the best...
fritzchaleff9 February 2003
Cycle Vixens is, as another user comment has said, one of the worst films ever made - but that's only half the story. While it is truly an act of will to get through the entire movie, the wait is incredibly worth it. Cycle Vixens shrugs the usual Hollywood thinking by actually fulfilling your desires for the three "biker chicks" in the final scene. Of the five people that started watching it, I was the only one left in the room for the finale. Once I was able to stop my uncontrollable laughter (after the end credits) I rewound the tape to just before the final scene and found the other four friends who had meandered to other places. They all sat and watched the end and agreed: it was the best ending of any film.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why?
eataTREE21 November 1998
This movie is so bad, it's embarrassing. I think it's intended as a sort of morality fable on the dangers of sex, drugs, and rock and roll. But the story is so muddled it's hard to tell. I hope they did not pay someone to write the screenplay.

This might make good subject material for Mystery Science Theatre, or as something to giggle at while stoned. Other than that, don't bother.
2 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More or less "Cheapie Rider"
Wizard-811 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
By the late 1970s, the motorcycle movie genre was essentially dead for even the drive-in crowd, but that fact did not stop the makers of this particular effort. It's obviously inspired in part by "Easy Rider", seeing that it concerns a number of different vignettes experienced by people on a long cross country motorcycle trip. Most of these vignettes are fairly light hearted and innocuous, but there are a few that are much darker in nature and don't really fit with the movie's otherwise breezy and upbeat tone - ESPECIALLY the ending, which REALLY comes out of left field. A more pleasant tone from beginning to end would have helped, though the movie would still probably have been made cheaply and crudely made as it is now. I will say that the movie is never boring despite its faults, and it does at times well tap into the fantasy many of us have of dumping our responsibilities and going on a long road trip. But I still can't really recommend it for a general audience, though film buffs who have an interest in obscure drive-in product of the 1970s might find it at times an interesting curiosity.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed