In Praise of Older Women (1978) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
in praise of sheer idiocy
Cherubin26 February 2001
"In Praise of Older Women" is relatively true to the excellent psychological/philosophical novel it is based on. However, the problem is that all its intellectual elements (such as its theories about the reasoning behind promiscuity) are removed in the adaptation. The result is a soft porn movie which is unintentionally hilarious due to awkwardness and bad acting. Andras, the skirt-chasing protagonist, is presented as a dip who throws a temper tantrum when one of his lovers leaves him and delivers lines like "Give us the grand tour, pops." or "This exquisite antique ashtray could be yours if you promise to become my lover." as awkwardly as if he actually knew how lame he sounded (which Tom Berenger, who played him, probably did). A bad acting award should also go to the girl who played Andras´s first teenage girlfriend. She delivers her lines as if the characters she talked to were puppies or newborn babies but then, as my friend pointed out, she actually does act like a stupid flirty girl in her early teens who does not know what she wants in a boyfriend. The actresses who play Andras´s more adult girlfriends admittedly do a better job but still, they mostly play along with the soft porn cliche of upper class semi-intellectuals who treat sex as if it was art collecting or jogging. What do they see in a dork like Andras at their age anyway ? Also, what´s the deal with some of the Hungarian characters having Hungarian accents and the other Magyars having AMERICAN accents ? Nevertheless, I must reemphasize that this movie is fun. It made me laugh more than most typical "comedies" and some of the dramatic scenes, such as the one where Andras must flee Hungary , actually do work dramatically. The sex scenes, while pretty mild by today´s standards, look relatively realistic. The insights into Hungarian culture are interesting too. Nevertheless, trash is trash and I love it !
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not at all bad, in fact; quite good
ODDBear4 June 2005
To be very honest, I can't really disagree with some of the negative reviews out there concerning this film. But every once in a while, some movie appeals to you and deep down you know that it's really not that good. As for this one, I've seen it a few times and I always enjoy it.

The film basically covers all of Berenger's sexual adventures with women who are somewhat older than he is. While he seems to fall deeply in love with them, these relationships don't seem to work out for him.

I really don't know what point this film is trying to make. Berenger's first real intimate relationship with Karen Black ends when he's unfaithful to her, his next one when he goes to Canada to escape turmoil in his country and leaves his rebel woman behind, the third woman is simply frigid and dumps him after he finally gets her off and finally he can't make it work with Helen Shaver.

I simply enjoy the movie. Tom Berenger is my favorite actor and he's very appealing here, as always. On the whole, this film is well acted, Karen Black very good especially. The movie looks good enough, with convincing settings, but I think it was produced on a relatively low budget. It's fairly dramatic at times, especially when he has to leave one girlfriend behind in war ridden Hungary.

This movie ain't spectacular or anything, but I like it.

One quibble; what's with that poster. Seems like a porno flick, definitely not the cover for this film.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Made to fill a niche that no longer exists
smatysia7 July 2013
Well, this film was made to fill a niche that no longer exists. Like the old B-movies sort of went away when that area fell to television, this film was soft-core before cable channels filled that niche. And, it does so better, having B-list actresses, rather than D-list and former porn actresses. Most of the actresses did really solid work, especially Karen Black, Marilyn Lightstone, and Helen Shaver. Tom Berenger was awkward to the point of being painful to watch, but I doubt that it is due to bad acting. That is almost certainly the director's vision. The dialogue was also painfully awkward, but that only makes sense. The background of the 1956 Hungarian uprising made for some interest as well. The film is intended to be sexy, so consider that when deciding to view this one.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tom Berenger and cougars!
BlackJack_B19 February 2014
George Kaczender's In Praise of Older Women, from Stephen Vizinczey's novel of the same name, is an extremely controversial film. The Canadian version of the MPAA objected to the nudity and explicit simulated sex in the film and would not release it unless Kaczender removed 2 minutes of footage. Kaczender was willing to remove 10 seconds of footage. Eventually, a compromise was reached and 30 seconds were edited out of the film. IPOW was released in 1978 and won 4 "Genie" Awards.

Regardless, IPOW is nothing more than a classier version of the type of film The Asylum would produce in 2014. Tom Berenger, in his second notable film appearance, plays Andras Vayda, a young man who wants to be a professor and is looking for love. Thing is, he doesn't want to get frisky with women his own age. He seems more interested in seducing women who are 15 years his senior or older. Throughout the movie, he has affairs with a number of older women throughout a 12 year period played by the likes of Karen Black, Marilyn Lightstone, Susan Strasburg, Alexandra Stewart and Helen Shaver (who was actually 2 years younger than Berenger was) while an older voice representing him narrates at times.

Despite being nothing more than soft core pornography, there are some good scenes. Alberta Watson, another one of his conquests, plays a cabaret singer dressed in a French outfit who sings a seductive song that piques his interest. Shaver, who won a "Genie" for her character of Ann MacDonald, offers some light comic relief and Black is as solid as ever as Maya, the gateway to Andras' love of cougars. Berenger shows promise as an actor early on but despite his top billing, cedes to the established actresses. The movie also uses the 1956 Hungarian Revolution as a backdrop and then later his time as a professor in Montreal.

While not a great piece of cinema, it is a good film among 1970's erotica and it's elevated by the big names in the cast, present and future. Certainly worth a look for curiosity sake.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable soft core porno flick
preppy-316 December 2004
I caught this playing constantly on cable TV late at night back in the early 80s. Not much of a plot. It's just about hunky Tom Berenger (who was only 29 when he made this) seducing one older woman after another. That's all it is--nothing else...but not bad for what it is.

The woman themselves are all very beautiful, have nice bodies and (surprisingly) are good actresses--Karen Black and Helen Shaver especially. The only disappointment in the film was there were next to no full frontal nude shots of Berenger. The women show everything but not him and--let's face it--back then he WAS very handsome and had a great body. There are only flashes of his "best parts" and (for some reason) even THOSE were clumsily edited out the last time I saw the pic (in the mid 80s)! If you're gonna do a soft core pic let's see everything.

That aside it was a light, enjoyable sex film--nothing more. I give it a 7.
19 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Could've been better without Tom Berenger
ILoveTheNight30 May 2020
Average cheating movie, starts good and fast but Tom Berenger is not good type for this role, his wooden acting made movie less interesting, Joe D'Alessandro type of guy would have made this movie a lot better. Best thing about movie that all actresses delivered good performances.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A guilty pleasure.
gridoon3 December 2002
Like someone else on this page has already said, this movie should not be approached as a serious period piece, but as a soft-core porn flick. The vapid characters have been stripped of all human dimensions except their sex drive. You kind of wonder when exactly Tom Berenger's character found the time to become a philosophy professor, since we almost always see him in a horizontal position, if you know what I mean. But nobody can deny that the film does have some genuinely erotic moments (Susan Strasberg steals the show in that department, as the always "hungry for more" Bobbie). (**)
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Redundant,redundant , redundant...Can You say Redundant?
Greatornot5 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This film though artsy ,was , well, you guessed it redundant. Growing up as a middle man for a brothel and being introduced to sex from a countess at the ripe old age of 11 or so, Andres becomes a stud, not gigolo , for sex starved housewives, between 30 and 40 or so. Taking place in Hungary during mid century, this film even seemed that much more far fetched. Andres , not having luck with teens his own age , ventures for older women. Going through women like the rest of the male population goes through underwear, this film did not have much of a point. Surely women can not be as pathetic as they were in this film? The cheesy lines were as ridiculous as the revolving door of a plot, that just kept going around and around. In the one scene, where a stupid line did not work, conveniently there was an attractive older lady, dining alone,ahemmmm, at another table that somehow saved the day for Andres. Too contrived, too predictable and well too soft porn. From a male perspective, lots of lovely visuals, but not much else going. Basically the open ending , just presumed more of the same, with nothing settled with Andres as far as his conscience or simply just becoming a mature adult. Another film, unlikable characters and a garbage pail.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sexy movie
IMDb-Girl8731 July 2004
Tom Berenger plays a young Hungarian having flings with older women.

Pretty much a soft soft soft core porn flick. Really, boy meets girl, boy seduces girl, girl sleeps with boy.

Why are the women such sluts in this film? They will have sex at any opportunity given. Not once does Tom Berenger get turned down for sex. It is quite a boring film but it seems ever 2 minutes Tom Berenger has a new bed buddy. So it ain't that bad. But if you're looking for entertainment, this film aint for you.

My rating.. 1/5.
10 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Go Off With A Bang
refinedsugar4 April 2024
'In Praise of Older Women' is one of those films I first saw on late night tv in the 90's as a teen and I cannot lie. It was definitely strong sexual themes, content that caught my eye. I've never forgotten it, but only by chance over twenty years later do I revisit and find myself appreciating it for other elements now. Largely because it's plot goes for gravitas in matters of love, intercourse between the opposite sexes and fails.

András Vayda (Berenger) a young boy in war torn 1940's Hungary loses his father and becomes raised solely by his mother. He's an able go between for American GI's, black market supplies which grants him his first taste of female pleasure. Now older he finds young women his age difficult and his search for love, sex turns to the mature set. As his country, world changes before him so does he and it's one romance after another, lessons in heartbreak and moving on.

Watching this now, I was surprised at what we young men used to find arousing. We've come a long way with nudity in cinema and what's on display is relatively tame and in much shorter bursts than I recalled. Though I'm not sure what light to view a young boy's encounter with a prostitute under anymore. When that wasn't occupying my mind it was me trying to keep a straight face. Buying into Tom as an awkward young man (he was nearly thirty here). A bit when he reveals contemplating suicide if he didn't get the nerve to ask Maya (Karen Black) to have sex. Then later on offering a woman a ceramic ashtray as a gesture of love.

I'm in a odd spot trying to critique 'In Praise of Older Women'. My younger self enjoyed the sex, appreciation for older women even if I couldn't grasp the cinematic badness going on, historical elements. The mature me can see it's not a great film and bungles many of it's ideas, theme but still retains an interesting notion or two. Perhaps that's all that needs to be said. The writing, characters aren't particularly strong, but it's not a horrible view if you got the right frame of mind.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Tom Berenger boring acting
SnoopyStyle28 November 2013
Andras Varda (Tom Berenger) is orphaned in WWII Hungary, where he becomes a kid hustler for the American GIs. As he grows up, he is disillusioned with the fickle girls of his own age. He gets involved with older Maya (Karen Black) who teaches him the ways of love. Then he has a string of lovers taking him to the Velvet Revolution and beyond.

For a movie that purports to advocate something profound, this seems to be a very superficial film. There is no depth to Tom Berenger's acting. I think he's not the best actor for the role. He looks like a jock trying to get laid. I think a geekier actor could bring more intelligence to the character. It would bring life to the interior monologue. And the pacing is terribly slow. Tom Berenger has the energy of a blank sheet of paper. I think he has the ability to project anger or power but he isn't allowed to in this movie. It's not his type of movie. It's not horrible but it is boring. It's probably more notable for some soft core pretensions.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
NICE, ENTERTAINING LITTLE FILM
theeht26 September 2000
If you can accept this Canadian made film as light entertainment, and not expect too much, you will definitely enjoy it. Unfortunately, at the time of release,it was unfavorably compared to the novel,and received some undeservedly vicious reviews,but it was a huge hit in Canada, where Helen Shaver received a best supporting Actress award for it.

Tom Berenger is remarkably charismatic as a Hungarian lad who has romances with some of the international cinema's most accomplished(and underrated actresses) actresses, Karen Black, Susan Strasberg, and Alexandra Stewart,after striking out with a girl his age(Marianne MacIsaac, sounding quite like a young Marilyn Monroe). Is's a pleasure to watch the then novice, very handsome Berenger hold his own as an actor against this talented trio. Much was written about the film's sexuality and nudity, but it's not much, except for an extremely heated closing encounter between Tom and Helen Shaver. All in all, a memorable, unique film.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A guilty pleasure, a cheesy classic
hugobolso-116 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
In Praise of Older Women is based of an almost autobiagraphical novel of Stephen Vizinczey. Born in Hungary in 1933.- It's the story of a young man who have sex with elder women, because he has no luck with women of his age.-

This version was directed by George Kaczender and the cinematography of Miklós Lente.-

There is another version of this book called En brazos de una mujer mayor in 1997. An Spanish version with Faye Dunnaway as the Countess, Juan Diego Botto as the main hero and Joanna Pacula as the hero first love.- This is only the first half of this movie and is a complete mess. For example the novel and this movie is about a guy who scapes from communist Hungary, while the Spanish version is a communist who scapes from Franco, Not only but also the first half of the spanish remake is this movie first 5 minutes.-

I guess is important to give this introduction, because many people who criticed this, haven't seen the other awful version.

I haven't read the book, so probably intellectual elements were removed (as someone post before) in search of the the cheesy dialogue, funny situations, the softporn scenes. But this is definitive superior in almost every element than the Spanish Remake.-

A kid named Andras (Ian Tracey) is an hungarian refugee has sex with a Countess (Monique Lepage) in 1945, however he had no more sex in the next six year. Now 18 in 1951 Andras (Tom Berenger) tried to had sex with Julika a girl around his age, but he failed in their first encounter, after that he fell in love and have sex with his tutor and neighboard Maya (sexy Oscar Nominee Karen Black), and finally learn about sex. Maya in her late 30s had an open marriage, then he had sex with Maya's best friend, then he try to seduce another girl of his age. A sexy cabaret singer (Nikita's Alberta Watson), however she wants to remain virgin until marriage, so frustated Andras try to recovered Maya but she refuses his advances.

5 years later in 1956 he have another relationship with a 12 year older woman Bobbie, she is even more sophistical woman, and encourage in his philosophy studies, both are against the communist regime, and at the end help him to scape from Hungary. He flew to Canada.

Now in 1959, with 26 (more like Berenger age) he had another relationship with an older woman named Paula (Alexandra Stewart, with the best naked body), she is french, and he learns about the 69. He has an open relationship with her, so he had no trouble in trying to seduce another woman in her 30s . With luck with elder women, Ann MacDonald (Helen Shaver who in real life was younger than Berenger), who is seduced but refuse to have sex with him, because she still faithfull to her idiot husband. 4 years laterm Ann tries to seduce Andras, they go to bed, but she refuse to have sex at the last seccond.

Andras had a concies crisis after it. Because he is 30, and a women in her 30s refused him, but in the elevator he met the love of his life, the girl (also in her 30s) who would be married and the movie end here.

The author met his wife in 1963 Gloria, who was divorcee and 6 year older, they married and were happily married until her deceaced in 2020.-

This is a funny commedy, with lot of sex scenes, several full frontal nudes ones. And having then respected actresses like Karen Black or Susan Strasberg doing this, I guess was a kind of kinky and controversial.- The movie was a hit during the Toronto Film festival, for the sex scenes, that are many, steamy and realistic. Today with political correction is impossible to make a movie like this.- The movie is a delight commedy with cheese quotes, but I guess they came from the book.

Tom Berenger, who was in his last 20s, was too old and Zero Innocent for the first 3/4 of the movie. It's started his scenes at 18 and end at 30. Someone who was younger and had a more innocent face should be a better option.

However after he arrived to Canada he is suitable for the role, and his last acting scenes are great, he is a seductor, and he become a sex symbol in the 80s. His chemestry with MacDonald is great.-

However are Karen Black and Susan Strasberg the ones who really shines here. There were still A stars at the late 70s, and their roles are more juicy than big budget disaster films. The actresses knew this and stick their teeth on the film.

It's awkward that the awarded actresses in the Canadian Film Award were Shaver, Watson and Lightstone. That don't get me wrong, these three specially Shaver were great who won in leading despite the fact she appears less than ten minutes in the screen. So I guess that Black and Strasberg were omitted for being American and Hollywood actress.- A pitty because these women were incredible here, and (except Black from Robert Altman Films)never had more opportunities to share their talent, and were reduced for B or C movies.-
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
In praise of a movie I didn't think I'd like very much.
mark.waltz21 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is much more than just a young buck (Tom Berenger) seducing and dumping a bunch of sophisticated older women. It's the story of a series of time passing by in a classic era of romance yet a troubled time socially and politically. It's the study of a basically insecure young man who can't relate to women his own age (having tried to seduce someone his age and failed) and ends up satisfying series of sophisticated older women more deserving than what they have with their husbands or lovers their own age, unable to accept the fact when these relationships come to an end.

The very handsome and sexy Barringer certainly is desirable, and you can see why certificated Karen Black takes him on as a lover, yet unable to deal with it when she find him having been seduced by a friend (the outrageous Marilyn Lightstone), ultimately dumping him and leaving him on the steps in tears. His next rendezvous is with an avant-garde artist (Alberta Watson) which doesn't lead to the relationship being consummated, and then later to musician Susan Strasberg, which takes place during some rebellious times in communist Russia.

Berenger finally ends up in Montreal a few years later, finding love once again with a French beauty, Alexandra Stewart. He's still dashing as he gets older, but just as immature, trying the same seduction line that he had years before. Stewart is putty in barringer's hands, and it's in this sequence where you get to almost see him completely in the buff. This is definitely a film divided into chapters, and the lack of continuity Is not an issue because of the way you get to view history.

For me, Lightstone made the biggest impression, her obviously jealous matron setting her sights on Berenger, obviously realizing she'll never have him for the long-term so she might as well have him for a little bit of fun. Black and Strasberg also give good performances, and Watson is a cabaret artist that Christopher Isherwood would have been proud to write about. So while there isn't a really strong story, the way everything is developed makes it an enjoyable film, and each of these older women indeed did deserve some praise.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed