Battlestar Galactica (TV Series 1978–1979) Poster

(1978–1979)

User Reviews

Review this title
88 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Uneven show, but an entertaining one at that
TheLittleSongbird14 October 2016
It is very easy to see why 'Battlestar Galactica' was popular at the time, even with its early cancellation, and had high ratings, as well as still having people very fond of it.

At the same time it is also easy to pick faults with 'Battlestar Galactica', which through adult eyes is an uneven show with the flaws much more noticeable. With me, there is still fondness for it from a nostalgic point of view, it fascinated and entertained me as a child and it still does now as a young adult. However, 'Battlestar Galactica' is a long way from a perfect show and could have done far more with the potential it had. It is a long way from a bad show, just not great.

There is a lot to like. Apart from costumes and hairstyles that feel very 70s and date the show a bit, repetitive use of effects and lack of scope for space itself (space is huge, this felt pretty compact), the look of 'Battlestar Galactica' is fine. The sets are eye-catching, it's very nicely shot and the effects themselves were great for the 70s and even though used in a repetitious and recycled fashion hold up reasonably well now with the odd limitation here and there.

With the music, one has to love the rousing bombast and playful energy of the scoring, while the theme tune is up there with the most iconic theme tunes of any show from the 70s and of the sci-fi genre. There are many nice moments in the script, with some knowing humour and thought-provoking opening narration and closing quotes. Tonally and quality-of-plots-wise, 'Battlestar Galactica' is inconsistent. When it was not good it was cringe-worthy ("The Young Lords", especially the annoying interplay of the child actors and the child actors themselves) but when it was good it was fantastic ("War of the Gods" took a darker and bolder approach and at the same time ended up epitomising what the show is all about).

'Battlestar Galactica's' stories could have benefited better from having a time-line, which would have made the tone more focused and the quality of stories more consistent. Due to that the show can get bogged down by some childish antics, that turned out not to be cheesy in a good way it sometimes got embarrassing (like they were trying too hard to appeal to children or a family-friendly audience). As well as too many homages (like in "The Magnificent Warriors" or that clumsy and weird cowboy in space episode "Lost Warrior" - in an attempt to appeal to older audiences, indicating a confusion as to which target audience to aim it at- that serve little relevance or point, loses the whole focus of the story in question and like they'd forgotten what the quest was. When it took a darker and bolder approach with more challenging subjects, it was often very engrossing and that approach could have been explored even more.

Most of the characters work very well, Starbuck (a favourite among fans and with good reason) and dignified Adama are my favourites. Apollo and Boomer are also great. The exceptions are the child actors in "The Young Lords", annoying and trying-too-hard-to-be-cutesy Boxey (played to not much better effect by Noah Hathaway, who went on to give a great performance in 'The NeverEnding Story', so the blame lies on the writing not Hathaway) and the less said about Muffit II (especially painful in his very over-exposed role in "Fire in Space") the better. The Cylons are also inconsistently characterised, sometimes menacing at other idiotic and made to look like fools.

The performances, apart from the children, are in fine keeping with the show and hold up well on their own, Lorne Green, Richard Hatch and Dirk Benedict being especially good. Patrick Macnee, Herbert Jefferson Jnr and John Colicos are sterling support as well.

In conclusion, uneven but entertaining. 7/10 Bethany Cox
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
good sci-fi TV for its day
SnoopyStyle22 July 2017
Battlestar Galactica protects the surviving ragtag convoy of two hundred plus refugee ships from the Twelve Colonies after the devastating conquest by the Cylon Empire. Commander Adama (Lorne Greene) leads the search for the mythical thirteenth colony Terra. Captain Apollo (Richard Hatch) and Lieutenant Starbuck (Dirk Benedict) are the leading Viper pilots. They struggle to escape the traitor Baltar (John Colicos) and his Cylon cohorts under Lucifer.

This Star Wars inspired franchise stumbles from time to time but at the end of the day, this is good sci-fi TV especially for its day. The biggest stumbles are the various human settlements that the convoy encounters. It puts the central premise under problematic rewriting. The basic premise is that these are the last of humanity looking for salvation. That's the drama. All these other human populations punch holes in that premise. They could stop at these places or gather up these survivors. It doesn't help to have unicorns either.

The best episodes are probably Battlestar Pegasus and Fire in Space. The human settlements episodes are repetitive and degenerative. I'm also not a big fan of Boxey and Muffit. The Ship of Lights is memorable and could be expanded. The idea for Ice Planet Zero is classic but flawed at its core. It's a stationary weapon after all. There are quite a bit of recycling in the action FX sequences but that's to be expected for TV. One does grade on a curve and this is one of the better ones in its era.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
At the time, there was nothing like it
PlugInYourBrain11 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The Original 1978 Battlestar Galactica TV Series has copped a panning compared to the vastly superior 2004 "gritty reboot".

To rate the original series fairly you need to understand not what it is like now, but what it was like then.

In 1978 we had never seen anything like it. We had "Star Wars" the year before, but that was just 2 hours and 15 minutes in a cinema, and it was three years until the next one.

Battlestar Galactica offered us the same thing on TV every week. Girls didn't much care, but boys went crazy. Battles in space, every week! What's not to like?

After an impressive opening the show took a dive. Apparently intent on attracting a family viewing, they de-emphasized war-in-space and started copying other shows. The Dirty Dozen... in space. High Noon... in space. Murder She Wrote... in space.

Adults weren't fooled and didn't watch anyway. Half-way through "The Living Legend" offered some respite, but Kids wondered what happened to their space opera.

Towards the end they switched back to science fiction. We got a string of very good shows such as "War of the Gods", "Experiment on Terra" and "Greetings from Earth". This was good sci-fi and what we'd wanted to watch all along. But by then the ratings had fallen and although still good, not enough to justify the show's huge budget. After just one season the show was axed.

The acting wasn't up to much, but I doubt kids noticed or cared. Lorne Greene made a great Adama; a warmer and more loving fatherly figure than the reboot's Edward James Olmos (awesome, but in a different way). They replayed the same special effects shots every week, but they were spectacular nonetheless. The production design was camp, but in the 70's people wanted mindless escapism. They didn't want the gritty realism we see in today's sci-fi dramas.

One thing teenager boys were heartbroken over was the disappearance of Maren Jensen as Adama's daughter Athena. We never forgave Starbuck for dumping her for Laurette Spang's character of Cassiopea. Why? Why? Why?

As I rate shows on IMDb I realize the futility of a ratings system. It depends on who is watching, and when they were watching it. I'll try anyway:

A kid in 1978: 8 / 10. An adult in 1978: 5 / 10. A kid in 2013: 4 / 10. An adult in 2013: 2 / 10. An adult watching only the better episodes in 2013: 8 / 10.

Unless you're in nostalgia mode and really want to watch everything I recommend you only watch the better episodes: 1-5, 12-13, 15-16, 19-20, 22-24.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Exodus in Space
grendelkhan30 January 2003
Battlestar Galactica is one of those series you either love or hate, or else didn't watch. I loved it. It had a great concept and, generally good effects. The writing was a bit uneven at times, with the "homages" to other genres and movies getting way out of hand (Magnificent Seven, Guns of Navarone, Shane, Dirty Dozen, Perry Mason, Towering Inferno, etc.). As far as the criticism of "rip-off" goes, Battlestar Galactica was vindicated in court and in saga itself. The only real similarities with Star Wars are that both are space opera, both have bad guys in armor, both had dogfights in space, and both had John Dykstra supervising the effects. Otherwise, the biblical story of Galactica bore little resemblance to the mythical Star Wars. Besides, Star Wars was inspired by Flash Gordon, Kurosawa's The Hidden Fortress, The Dam Busters, King Arthur, and the works of Joseph Campbell. I think a series based on Exodus and Erik Von Danekan can be cut a little slack.

The acting was generally good, although the child actors were not the most skilled (but, hey, they're kids). Lorne Greene was great as the fatherly Adama, leading his people on a search for their brethren. Richard Hatch was the mature and stoic Apollo; the cerebral hero. Dirk Bennedict is the reckless and fun-loving Starbuck, the true fighter pilot in space. John Colicos is the evil Baltar, traitor to his people; part Benedict Arnold, part Herod, part Hitler. Add a well rounded supporting cast and you have a fine ensemble.

Yes, there is much dated material here: feathered hairdo's, disco clothes, social interaction; but it doesn't detract from the better stories. The use of a unique slang was a nice idea, but a bit distracting. The music was good and the Egyptian influences were interesting in the designs. The uniforms were stylish and gave a sense of military symbol and function. The ship designs were cool (can't say it any other way).

The biggest fault in this series is the tendency to depart from the overall saga into homage episodes. "Gun on Ice Planet Zero" was a fine remake of the Guns of Navarone and the Dirty Dozen, but it also presented a threat to the fleet and a new obstacle they must overcome. Others, like "The Lost Warrior" or "The Magnificent Warriors" had little consequence for the fleet and tended to get bogged down. The series was at its best when the Galactica found a new clue to the lost tribe, or overcame the Cylons to live another day. Unfortunately, the producers didn't have a timeline in mind when they created this show, unlike Babylon 5. Had they determined how long the journey should take, they could have avoided unnecessary episodes and concentrated on the overall saga, bringing character development and drama into the story, without losing sight of their goal. As it was, we were teased with false Earths and little idea when the Lost Tribe would be found. Unfortunately, when it was found, the series took a complete nosedive.

It will be interesting to see what the future will bring for this series; but, for the present, I will continue to watch my tapes. Is it too much to ask for a DVD release for the entire series?
59 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Still pretty good in many ways.
reb-warrior30 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I first watched this when I was 6 or 7 years old. I loved it when I was a little kid. Now I'm in my forties and decided to give it a rewatch during the pandemic.

Some things didn't date well, such as costumes, haircuts, music & dancing at the bar scenes. And frankly technology. The big computers systems appear clunky. The cylons, well I thought they were cool, but gotta admit, they're probably outdated too. Still love the vipers.

I loved Apollo and Starbuck as a kid, and again now that I'm older. These two actors had charisma and charm. Usually, a vanilla character like Apollo would bore me, but I like his passion and the actor's delivery of lines. Now that I'm older, I really appreciate other characters such as Adama, Tigh, and Boomer. I wish there was more of Athena, Adam's daughter, and Apollo's sister. In fact I wish there were more female-centric stories. Baltar is still a great villain.

I think most importantly is that the mythos and the tie-in to ancient mythology and the Egyptians still work. This must no doubt be a fave among ancient alien enthusiasts. I just think they did a pretty good job on the main concept of the show. There are a couple of lemon episodes. But overall it's still really good. Too bad they only had one season. Yet it had such a popular following that it generated a popular reboot. I'd love to watch the reboot. I tried when it first came out, but they did that shaky-camera thing that bothers my eyes and brain. I may give it another shot.

The only thing is now that I'm older and more cynical, is the idea that Adama and the Galactica has about the shiny planet of Earth. They put all their hopes and dreams into it. All I can think as I watched, is "if only they knew how badly earthlings suck." We would totally inter these people at a secret camp, steal their technology, interrogate them on everything, force them to work for us, and/or kill them. See, cynical.

Anyway, I still appreciate the series. It was a little surreal taking me back to my childhood during the pandemic. It's not perfect, but still pretty watchable. I enjoyed it. 6/10
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sci Fi Classic
hey-bill878 February 2007
It's a very good, and very well made sci-fi classic.

It has it's own style and feel to it, and unlike most sci-fi films it doesn't stretch the boundaries of human knowledge and lend siege to a bunch of aliens or space fights or whatever. It lays down themes that although seem a million light years away, are in fact maybe closer to our time than we first thought.

With a riveting story, depth to characters and amazing memorable acting from Dirk Benedict, Richard Hatch, and Loren Greene

I think it is only suffice to say that this film is a marvel of it's genre and with criticism and technicalities aside I think you cannot argue that this film is great in all proportions.
38 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Superior to the 2004 Re-imagined Series
soundtechpro23 August 2023
While BG 1978 original series lacked the budget, realistic effects and polished look available in BG 2004, it is a far superior series because it was a story of triumph, hope and the human spirit unlike BG 2004. It had a positive conclusion that would lead to the re-establishment and survival of the human race. The downside; The scripts were uneven and the teleplay dialogue could be lacking and like every other TV show of its era, the pace is much slower than TV and movies had become by 1990. There were many missed opportunities but Battlestar Galactica was just lucky to even be greenlit at all. BG 1978 was uplifting unlike BG 2004 which was just depressing. BG 1978 was a very interesting story with an interesting cast of characters. The Cylons in original Battlestar Galactica was a warning about creating technology that could become self-aware and turn on and destroy humanity. In BG 1978, humans did not create the Cylons (it was a lizard like race). I actually liked the Cylon origin story change that humans created the Cylons in BG 2004 because it was a more plausible reason they turned on humans and furthered the cautionary tale of creating AI that could supplant humans. However, that was the only change I liked about BG 2004. Galactica 1978 was positive and had some redeeming characters while BG 2004 was the most convoluted stprytelling that made absolutely no sense. Yes, the writing was uneven like all low budget sci-fi TV series, it was treated as a "red-headed step-child" and was expected to fail before it began.

BG 1978 was all also hamstrung and blackballed because George Lucas filed a lawsuit claiming BG was a ripoff of Star Wars which is was not and Lucas eventually lost. However, the damage was done and arrogant George Lucas badically caused the cancellation of BG 1978 because of all the legal cost and Lucas himself turning the fanatics of Star Wars against BG. All the while Geprhe Lucas himself got most holis ideas for Star Wars from other sources including books; Perleandra by C. S. Lewis, Dune,The Foundation Books by Isaac Asimov,, A Princess of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs and many others along with a borrowing a few elements from Star Trek created by Gene Roddenberry. So thanks to Lucas, BG was boycotted by Star Wars fans and got bad publicity.

BG 1978 was ultimately uplifting despite the human race almost being wiped out. The Cylons in original Battlestar Galactica was a warning about creating AI technology that could become self-aware and turn on and destroy humanity. In BG 1978, humans did not create the Cylons (it was a lizard like race). I actually liked the Cylon origin story change that humans created the Cylons in BG 2004 because it was a more plausible reason they turned on humans and furthered the cautionary tale of creating AI that could supplant humans. However, that is the only change I liked about BG 1978 was a great story with a great ending. Yes, the writing was uneven like all sci-fi TV series, it was treated as a "red-headed step-child" and was expected to fail before it began. It has only been the last few years that sci-fi has been given the same respect of other genres on TV. Sci-fi cost much more to produce if done well due to costuming, sets, special effects and makeup. That is why we get sub-par sets and effects and creation of episodes that take place almost all in one area with dialogue to explain what is going in.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the top sci-fi series of all time!
hnt_dnl13 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Loved BATTLESTAR GALACTICA (1978-79) series as a kid, and still love it. I've re-watched most of the episodes of this series over the years whenever they would air it on cable (they used to air it a lot) and was amazed at how re-watchable, entertaining, uplifting, and, dare I say it, provocative this series was. As a kid, it was all about the space battles and shiny-looking Cylons. As an adult, I realized there was so much more underneath. The series is a great example of instilling principles of leadership, friendship, family values, community, and heritage.

The 1-season series was about a ragtag fleet of human colonists who escape their home world of Caprica after a devastating attack by a species of robotic aliens called Cylons. The fleet is led by Commander Adama (wonderfully played by TV legend Lorne Greene in my favorite ever role of his). Adama commands the last remaining Battlestar, the Galactica, which must lead the way of the fleet to a star system light years away, which includes the planet Earth.

While Adama is the fleet leader and doles out the orders, for me, the heart and soul of the fleet (and the series) is his son Captain Apollo (brilliantly played with passion and persuasion by Richard Hatch, in his best role ever). Apollo is the ultimate sci-fi heroic role model: brave, strong, confident, decisive, caring, and faithful. Hatch was really the star of the series as he had top billing and most of the big scenes always involved his character. Apollo was the leader of the Viper fighting squadron aboard the Galactica and led most away missions and battles.

Assisting the stars Hatch and Greene is an eclectic supporting cast: (1) the insanely popular Lt. Starbuck, played with tongue-in-cheek humor and appeal by TV vet Dirk Benedict, who was Apollo's fellow pilot, right hand and best friend, (2) Col. Tigh, played with stern authority by Terry Carter, who was Adama's 2nd-in-command, (3) Athena, earnestly played by 70s sex symbol Maren Jensen, who was Adama's daughter and Apollo's sister, (4) Lt. Boomer, nicely played by Herbert Jefferson Jr, who was Apollo and Starbuck's fellow pilot and friend, (5) Cassie, effervescently played by blonde bombshell Laurette Spang, who was a medic and Starbuck's girlfriend, (6) Boxey, played by Noah Hathaway, who was Apollo's adopted son, (7) Lt. Sheba, confidently played by Anne Lockhart, who was Apollo's fellow pilot and potential love interest introduced about halfway through the first and only season, and last but not least (8) BALTAR, superbly played by John Colicos, a traitor to the Colonies and human leader of the Cylon enemy. All the characters were well- defined on the show and brought something to the table. I liked how effortless the interactions were among the characters and the easygoing appeal that was ever-present throughout.

The special effects were cutting edge for the late 70s, capitalizing on the Star Wars craze that popularized the sci-fi action-adventure genre in both movies and TV. But "Battlestar Galactica" was really the first TV series that got it right, like Star Wars was the movie that got it right. In addition to the great effects, the show also fostered healthy discussion and debate among it's characters that felt organic, illustrating that an action series can be both fun and provocative.

Much like "Star Trek" of the 60s, "Battlestar Galactica" of the 70s, enjoyed only a limited run due to low ratings, but I truly believe, that pound for pound, these two series did more for the science fiction genre on television that many long-running sci-fi series in the later decades did, most of which ended up being very repetitive, watered-down, self- congratulatory, and unoriginal. In terms of sci- fi action-adventure, I'd actually rank this version of "Battlestar Galactica", the original one, second only to the original "Star Trek" series as the best of it's kind!
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Classic
Tweetienator11 November 2023
Battlestar Galactica is one of those fine and cheesy sci-fi shows of the past that still shine bright: like the Buck Rogers show and movies, Space: 1999 or the Planet of the Apes stories, the original Battlestar Galactica (like the remake) has one main feature - for its time well done special effects and settings (now looking dated of course, but in a good way, at least in my opinion) and strong casts and characters. Everyone who grew up with that kind of sci-fi (including the first Star Wars movie and Star Trek original series) will never forget characters like Starbuck or Apollo. After all those years, besides a few too cheesy episodes, Battlestar Galactica is still an epic adventure.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Engaging Sci-Fi Epic
stp4315 May 2003
Battlestar Galactica had so much going for it, and so much working against it from outside influences. That is has held up as an engaging sci-fi epic despite its myriad off-screen problems and short network run is a tribute to its many strengths in concept, overall production values, cast, and presentation.

Galactica was conceived as a series of TV movies, similar in format to the Columbo-McCloud-McMillan movie series format from earlier in the 1970s. However, late in the going ABC asked for a weekly series, a contingency for which Glen Larson, Universal, and company were not prepared. As a result, the series had a very uneven quality to the scripts, most notoriously shown in the standard-western scripts of the episodes "The Lost Warrior" and "The Magnificent Warriors." The passage of time, though, has been kind even to such clichés; the standard-western format of these early episodes can be traced to the western gunslinger themes of Star Wars and other 1970s sci-fi, and the performances of the casts, primary and guest, shine through and make these scripts work.

And as the show progressed mistakes were learned from and the writing became better. "Saga Of A Star World," "Lost Planet Of The Gods Part II," "The Long Patrol," and "The Living Legend" were more-sharply written stories combining the excellence of the cast with very good twists. It was with "Living Legend" (highlighted by Lloyd Bridges' show-stealing performance as Commander Cain, for which he will always be remembered) that really got the show's writing on a truly solid base, and excellent scripts followed in "War Of The Gods" (another story highlighted by the performance of the guest star, in this case Patrick Macnee, who immortalizes himself as Count Iblis), the excellent character-driven "The Man With Nine Lives," the surprisingly sharp murder mystery "Murder On The Rising Star," "Greetings From Earth," and the show's strongest and smoothest action drama "The Hand Of God."

The cast shines through good and bad in the show, from Richard Hatch, Dirk Benedict, Lorne Greene, and John Colicos (my personal favorite of the show) down through Herbert Jefferson Jr., Laurette Spang, Terry Carter, Jane Seymour in her all-too-brief involvement, and mid-season addition Anne Lockhart. The underused George Murdock, Jack Stauffer, John Dullaghan as Doctor Wilker, Ed Begley Jr., Sheila DeWindt, Janet Louise Johnson, Tony Swartz, and Larry Manetti also sparkle in their appearances, as does veteran character actor Olan Soule as agro ship caretaker Carmichel.

Guest stars were used to superb effect in many episodes. In addition to Lloyd Bridges and Patrick Macnee (both as Count Iblis and the Cylon Imperious Leader - the show smartly gave Iblis an angle on the fact that his voice is the same as that of the supreme Cylon), other show-making guest performers included Lance leGault (of later "A-Team" fame), Lloyd Bochner, James Whitmore Jr., John Hoyt, Murray Matheson (in two roles, Sire Gella and the Cylon IL Specter), and Ina Balin. The interplay between the characters in the main and guest casts was always superb, and the off-screen camaraderie among the cast (most hilariously shown in Galactica's in-house gag reel film displaying series outtakes, where Macnee lampoons his opening narration and Colicos concludes by offering to sell some swampland in Florida in full Baltaresque charm, and in the closing top-hat number "We Gotta Find Earth" sung hilariously by Hatch, Benedict, and Greene) made the performances all the better.

Much has been made of how the show reused SFX shots every episode; the criticism usually ignores the reality that no sci-fi series of the time could afford not to reuse stock SFX footage - Galactica's practice was hardly unprecedented to fans of the earlier Land Of The Lost series. Made today of course the show could feature new SFX each episode given the advances in SFX technology.

The combination of concept, cast, overall production values, and presentation made for an immensely enjoyable sci-fi series. Comparisons with the new Ronald Moore Galactica series are inevitable, but both add something to a superb concept.
29 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
By Your Command, But Not Really.
thescholar225 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"By Your Command", But not really though I just wanted to say that. But like watching the original Battlestar Galactica since without the original, the reboot wouldn't be around. I remember watching this on the Syfy channel as mini marathons to show people the original before the reboot aired. Originally aired in 1978 and was kind of attacked for being too much like Star Wars. Also had a big budget and had to be sent to be a bit censored as well. The big budget went to the computer since computers were big expensive things back then before today.

To the show, this show is about an alien race of people who after their world are destroyed by robots called "Cylons", go on a journey to try to find the last planet known as earth. Leaving this convoy of ships that survived is it the battleship or Battlestar called Galactica. Along the way they meet aliens, the Cylons trying to stop them, as well as the mysterious people trying to tell them something or lead them. There's also other people on other planets but I think at times they're just there so the main cast can talk to some other people.

After Battlestar Galactica was cancelled NBC tried to resurrect the show with Galactica 1980 but I heard it was pretty bad and didn't last long. It was then rebooted I think in 2003 with a miniseries and then a show in 2004 where Richard Hatch makes a cameo as well.

Anyway if you want to give this a watch go ahead, it's a bit more lighthearted compared to the gritty reboot. Also might help you get a just and feel for the plot too.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Space Opera Classic
aleksandarsarkic4 January 2016
I always wanted to see original version of Battlestar Galactica, i was never impressed by new one, so i finally watched it and i loved it, yes maybe special effects are outdated but still this show has a soul, heart and message, you also really got connected with the characters, and they are all very interesting and cool. The outstanding performance comes from legendary Lorne Greene as Captain Adama, you really have a feeling he is a leader and commander of Galactica, brilliant casting, also Terry Carter as Colonel Tigh is great, also performance from Richard Hatch(Apollo), Dirk Benedict(Starbuck), Herb Jefferson, Jr. (Boomer), John Colicos (Count Baltar), are worth mentioning. Story is solid, i was only disappointed with the ending but they planned to do second season. Loved also the design of spaceships and Cylons, Cylons in original version looked better 100 times than CGI ones in new series, and their vocoder voices just amazing. Through the series in some scenes we see clear moral and ethic messages and influence of Mormon faith(creator of the series was Mormon). I really enjoyed this serial, and really don't care for the new ones, but because of bad reviews i am not planning to watch Galactica 1980. I am recommending this one to all lovers of 70's sci-fi, space opera and generally people interested in retro things. my Grade 9/10.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Some good casting and fantastic design plus Dirk Benedict .
RobbieRedeyez15 June 2022
This series made big impact when i seen it as a kid , somewhere in the early 80's .

I did rewatch some while ago .

I think the real strongpoint of the series , is the design .

The vipers , the cylon fighters , the battlestars , the baseships , the cylons , these are all very nicely designed in my view .

Then the series has some nice actors that are well casted for their roles .

Dirk Benedict is a fine example of this .

Watching back it has it flaws at times , some episodes can be slow moving , or there can be a cringy moment .

But all in all this is a nice series in season 1 .

Season 2 its sad , but its just some worse then season 1 .
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really awful waste of a good idea
keith195826 January 2007
O.K. if you were five at the time, rubbish otherwise. Book was better.

What would you do if your civilisation had been destroyed and were being pursued by genocidal robots. Yes that's it you'd stop off for a party at a casino/disco planet. Then, you'd go on ignoring loads of habitable planets in favour of finding a mythical place you were not even sure existed. Al1 at sub-light speed. Definitely for tots of all ages and size

Really they should have called it "Bonanza Waggon Train In space" why they even had pa Cartwright. Take my advice, the new series is infinitely better. Better written, better acted, better effects. Don't waste your life with this. One star
19 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
one of my favorites
terp_9217 August 2000
Yeah yeah, so it may be considered a Star Wars ripoff by some. Who cares? As a kid in the 70's, I loved nothing more than the movie and then the subsequent ABC TV series especially with all of the special effects that kids love to see after Star Wars came out. And when the Scifi Channel started to show the series again, I couldn't get enough of it. An underappreciated scifi series in my opinion.
39 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
classic
quadrophenia-6952414 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I miss this on my screen i used to watch this when i was young i liked the cylons and remember one of the guys was in a team later on and i liked the theme tune wish they would show it again on tv like they do all old reruns
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Classic SciFi
Ron-2232 April 2009
While there are flaws in the series from the view of today, it IMHO stands up better than most before it.

BSG when it aired, offered the viewers an epic journey of mankind forced into the unknown void of space in search of a new home.

They were fighting for their lives against a foe that destroyed all that they knew.

What more can anyone expect is more central to their survival?

At all cost, the fleet of humans, went into the cosmos to search for a new home.

What more could be a more fitting story?
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good Story, Bland Characters
Jamespc9614 December 2014
First off, don't write this off as a complete Star Wars rip off because Star Wars itself ripped off older movies. With that said, this show's storyline is pretty cool. These robots known as the cylons, constructed by an alien race, wage war against the humans. The human race consists of twelve colonies with a thirteenth colony said to inhabit earth. The humans were all wiped out in the war and all that remains is the colony residing on Battlestar Galactica. The Battlestar, whilst fleeing from the cylons, journey in search of the long lost planet earth to claim as their new home. The cylon's design and voices are frakking epic! What weighs it down? The characters. They just don't have much good interactions. The cutesy kid is annoying. Tragic things might happen and he still just acts like he's the most innocent thing in the world in the very next episode. The design of cylon, Lucifer, is especially cheeses out. The evil Boltar helps lead the cylons, as a traitor to the human race, and he is an amusing edition to the show. A bit too stereotypical in his personality but a menacing presence and helps add to the freshly cut cheese. The show has potential with it's storyline it just needed better writing and thankfully this show was rebooted in 2003 to make for a much better written program.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
ABC Grabbeth the Cash, Droppeth the Ball
anderbilt6 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The reviews you'll read about this show are so varied, that they speak to the many missed opportunities that fill any post mortem of the original Battlestar Galactica.

Over and over in our history, we see this shared culture of ours spawning the same idea simultaneously in different locales. In the years just after 2001 A Space Odyssey and NBC's Star Trek raised the quality bar in Sci Fi like nothing before - - George Lucas and Glen Larson were crafting their huge space operas.

Star Wars and Battlestar Galactica TOS will remain forever linked by their proximity in time and their space-battlefield similarities, and this is unfortunate, because the success of Star Wars ultimately served to scuttle any chance that Battlestar Galactica had to succeed on its major DIFFERENCES. They were many and great, these differences, as we would finally see in 2003.

Battlestar Galactica starts with the destruction of a dozen human homeworlds and the deaths of billions of people at the hands of the Cylons, a reptilian foe. Decades later, Ronald D Moore and David Eick gave us this deep dark story in their excellent Battlestar Galactica 2003 and 2004, so we know this awesome dark potential existed right from the start in 1977. It really did. We all sensed it in the first two hours.

Why didn't we get that show? Because the TV industry which gave us crap like the Irwin Allen shows, and which undercut and ruined Star Trek years too soon, also dove in for a big cash grab while the Star Wars iron was hot. ABC gave no deep thought to what they had on their hands, or how to make it successful over a long haul.

What ABC did, was employ the recipes they used to create the other hits in their stable. They bought the series on a lowball budget that was presented and not possible to meet. They required kid-friendly elements and limited gunplay and violence (this is how the Cylons became a robot race - you could destroy dozens of them at a time since they weren't living beings after all). The budget meant the show veered from sci fi, to cheap episodes on backlot western town and historical drama sets, and struggled to explore the dark story and mystical supernatural theme that was introduced.

SO HERE WE ARE. While you read the haters here who LOVE the cheesiness of the original and rip and belittle Eick and Moore, just remember what Glen Larson actually envisioned, and how Eick and Moore really refined it and NAILED it in an excellent way in BSG 2004.

You CAN love both. It's ok. I do. It's also OK to blame network TV of the 60s and 70s for ruining Star Trek and Battlestar Galactica, so we could have both shows made better, later on.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Everything that it was
Frequency27026 October 2003
Make no mistake, this is series everything great and horrible in sci-fi simultaneously.

The whole TV series was a great idea in the wrong hands (or perhaps in hands that simply never got the support they needed). The series, I think was most loved and most watched by the 8-18 year old generation (I don't think I saw it until it was in reruns, at age 10 or older)of the late 70s-early 80s. Evidently a very small group, as seen by the show's short run.

Seeing it now I can see why it was canceled, but I also still see why I loved it. The shows were exciting, uncomplicated, sci-fi battle. And, as poor as the FX were, the model, character and set designs were and still are fantastic, fresh and contemporary.

For those curious, the FX were only slightly sub-par(and for TV, as good as it got--The problem when FX artist try to exceed their budget and capabilities) at the time, but the repeated use of the same scene over-and-over again was highly noticeable.

For the younger generation, weaned on TNG, Andromeda, etc., it maybe too distracting, but I remain a loyal BSG fan, and recommend it for those who still love the exciting rush of a sci-fi story and battle.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great sci fi series
grantss21 April 2023
After their home planet is attacked and destroyed by the Cylon Empire, a large group of refugees sets out across the universe to find a new home. The armada is lead by Commander Adama in the Battlestar Galactica. Every day is a struggle for survival as the Cylons seek to destroy the fleet.

One of my favourite TV series as a child and one I still enjoy today. It is quite the epic adventure as the rag tag fleet makes its way across the universe in search of a place to live, all the while fending off the attacks of the Cylons. It makes for some great action scenes, tales of heroism and sacrifice, camaraderie and simply a fantastic story.

Enthralling viewing.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What made the original Battlestar Special
nightwing6023 June 2008
I think what made the original special was its universal themes of Family, Friendship, & Survival. But beyond that is the fact the show had character you actually care about. I mean the relationship between apollo, starbuck and boomer is good enough to watch the show. This were i think most shows today fail to do including the New version of BSG. TV use to be full of great character that you actually cared about. From Spock to Data to Magnum P.I to David Banner (Incredible Hulk) to even to Kevin Sorbo's Hercules.

To tell the truth i was big into the new BSG until the end of the first season. When they did the whole Space Munity (witch is a name of a very bad movie) episode. It took me some time for me to realize that BSG was just Law and order in space. Unlikeable Characters, Tired Plot lines, and after a while just kinda boring. As for the Character Changes, Well with new version of BSG. While the original Starbuck fun, exciting and likable character. in the new version Starbuck is pretty much a bitch/slut. By the way i believe the word Buck refers to a male. Maybe if the named her Stardoe it would make more sense. As for Adama, Instead of a kind and loving leader. You get the same old stereotype a military man with a family and Apollo is just plain boring.

Some people say that the fight between old fans of BSG and fans the new version is like the fight between Star Trek vs Star Trek TNG. I think this isn't a fair comparison. First off both shows were created by the same man and the theme of the both show where the same. Sure the shows were different. But what star trek was about was the same. The same really cannot be said about the two version of BSG. Beside the main theme of Survival. They are really drastically different. Some say the original version was cheesy and while it was to a curtain extent. Doesn't mean what the show was about was any less veiled. Beside people say the same thing was said about the original Star Trek and beside TNG i think was still one the best Sci-Fi shows ever. Why i think the original was special is because its everything that the new version isn't and the new version of BSG is like everything else on TV today, overrated and pretentious.

Some people might say that I'm looking at the old series through the lens of nostalgia. The truth is i never even bother to watch the old series until the new version came out. So i really don't have an nostalgia for the old show. I just compared the two and found the new version dull in comparison. Some fans of the New show have said the old version is to immature and the fans of the old need to grow up. Since when has growing into a adult means you have to become a dull person who has lost all his sense of fun and watch nothing but boring drama with dull & unlikeable characters. The truth is the state of TV today is sad, dark and depressing. Television was far better in the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's and mid 90's. So in closing, I think the golden age of television has pretty much ended and all we have left is a sad hollow shell of what it once was.
22 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Strictly for Pre-Adolescents, Adults need not Apply
solpsizm10 February 2008
I was a fan of this series... when I was SEVEN YEARS OLD. Even then, though, at an age and maturity where I possessed no critical discernment whatsoever and loved any movie or show with action or in space, I could somehow sense that this show wasn't really that good and was very cheesy.

Recently, out of curiosity because of the excellent 2004 series that bears the same name, and because Netflix offered me some free hours of instant viewing, I watched the old series again. Not only did it confirm my 7-year old memories, but it actually turned out to be worse than I imagined: trite, bad special effects, completely devoid not only of any authentic drama but amazingly any excitement or visceral action, mediocre acting, insipid writing, etcetera, etcetera.

The ONLY appeal it could have to anyone above the age of let's say, 12, is camp. Even then, since the series hilariously took itself seriously, the camp is not as much as you'd expect. The barebones of the plot -- that our Earth was once one of 13 colonies of a futuristic civlization that bears many similarities to our own Ancient Greece -- does have some interest but they do little with it. Actually, I take the first statement of this paragraph somewhat back because no 12 year old today is going to watch this, as its special effects are laughable and the action is so so lukewarm.

It's pretty sad when the best and most dramatic acting of your first episode is by RICK SPRINGFIELD. NO JOKE.

I won't even compare this to the recent 2004 remake since they are so far apart in quality, and it's very unfortunate that the 2004 remake bears the same name as this series because it's lost a lot of potential viewers and accolades because of it. This original series is exactly the same quality as the Buck Rodgers movie and TV series starring Gil Gerard that came out at the same time. However, that TV series was more fun because it knew it wasn't that good from the get go and didn't take itself so seriously.
25 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An Underappreciated Classic
Eric-62-219 September 1999
Only in the last five years or so has "Battlestar Galactica" begun to emerge from the unfair stigma that was attached to it for so many years as a "Star Wars ripoff". Although a lot of people don't know this, based on what gets written by BG bashers in their histories of sci-fi TV, George Lucas's lawsuit against Universal was dismissed on all counts and found to be without merit. Indeed, considering how Lucas had "borrowed" from so many other genre stories of the past his lawsuit claiming Galactica stole from Star Wars was the biggest case of hypocrisy ever.

For me, "Galactica" continues to age well and is even better than it was when I first experienced it as a child in 1978. Unlike the Star Wars series, which increasingly came to be about FX at the expense of characters, BG's appeal has always lied in its characters. The characters of Apollo (Richard Hatch), Starbuck (Dirk Benedict), Adama (Lorne Greene), Sheba (Anne Lockhart) and even the wicked Baltar (John Colicos) were fascinating and multi-dimensional. And unlike Star Trek, there was a semblance of continuity and character development whereas the former was entirely self-contained from week to week with no development in the characters.

Was BG flawed? Certainly. But it also attracted a larger audience in its one year on ABC than any Star Trek series ever has in syndication. What can't be forgiven is ABC's quick dismissal of this show and then insulting the intelligence of us all by bringing it back in a bastardized version known as "Galactica 1980".

Hopefully, Galactica fans will one day get the last laugh if there is a successful revival with the original cast. It's a show that deserves another chance even more than Star Trek did.
52 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Flawed, but Fun.
jwrowe318 January 2003
Ah, GALACTICA. I had a party at my house on the night of the start of the series. A whole bunch of goofy high school juniors crowded into my living room watching the destruction of the human race by a bunch of evil robots ruled by a big lizard, hell-bent on galactic domination. An earlier poster made a comment about the show being interrupted by a news report(The Camp David Peace Agreements with Carter, Begin, and Sadat, signing the official accords)so while this was going on, we took a break for a bite. ABC, thoughtfully didn't rejoin the show in progress, but backed it up a few moments and started from there. Try THAT, today!

As the series commenced it was hard pressed to live up to, as Time magazine predicted, "block buster ratings". Re-used special effects, and a slow dive into "bad writing-ville", began after the first regular episode. And, as this was the first show in the ABC Sunday night line-up of shows, if football coverage went late, it was interrupted, and joined in progress. I remember being pretty unhappy when the cancellation of the series was announced, in early 1979.

Battlestar Galactica is pretty much cursed with a very dated "Disco-ish" look to it, with feathered hair, and '70-ish clothes. The reused SFX of Vipers banking away gets tired, too. A brave effort, but short lived.

Let's hope that the ever-planned update of the series stays true to the original concept. I'd happily watch Starbuck and Apollo fight Cylons, once again. Just pray that whom ever runs the show does not mess with the franchise.

And PLEASE have Maren Jensen in it, too!!!!
18 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed