Dark Victory (TV Movie 1976) Poster

(1976 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
When Samantha Stevens and Karen Fairgate met Hannibal Lechter.
mark.waltz1 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Another updated remake of a classic movie (itself based upon a flop Broadway play), this stars Elizabeth Montgomery as a tough TV producer who discovers that she has a terminal illness. Montgomery once again proves that she's more than the kindly witch suffering nosy neighbors and mothers-in-law and her own nasty mother, here dealing with her match making, advice giving best friend, anchor woman Michelle Lee. Doctor Anthony Hopkins is Lee's hopeful chosen suitor for la Lizzie, here quite acidic in attitude and unwilling to have anyone convince her that she's anything more than the dynamic force of nature she pretends to be.

Quite different in many ways than the movie (also remade with Susan Hayward as "Stolen Hours"), this can be judged on its own merits rather than the famous Bette Davis classic. Montgomery is always watchable, even here where she's not always likeable. A montage of stills showing her treatment is a dizzying effect, but gives an indication of the detailed treatment she goes through. This is where her character of Katherine begins to show some vulnerability and fear, and Montgomery really wins you over. You can see why she wanted to escape the image of Samantha with quite a different slew of character types, often complicated and not always sweetness and light.

Lee is a gorgeous co-star, like Montgomery having one of the best smiles in the business, and with just one look and no words able to tell Katharine how serious her condition is, a loyal friend of the highest order. Hopkins, then a respected but not yet legendary actor, is quite noble and commanding. By updating this to the world of television in the 1970's you get to see Montgomery playing a role very similar to Faye Dunaway's Diana from "Network", yet not nearly as ruthless, even though she does have a staff meeting in her hospital room. These changes really work to modernize a soapy tale, and that makes it quite above average.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than the 1939 version and underrated
seve07231 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
As a French admirer of Elizabeth Montgomery who played in "Bewitched"i watched this TV movie incidentally on YouTube searching for videos of Bewitched and i already watched this TV movie years ago in my early twenties..The movie got me emotionally and it is a good surprise,a convincing story..Liz or Katie in the role is overburdened by her job and she is constantly stressed ,we can see at the beginning of the movie that she is smoking a cigarette nervously,waiting for the Limousine car who will drive her to the studio where she is a producer of a TV program and everything seems OK when she arrives at her office except that she is very quickly stricken by a headache. Her vision is blurred and she sees like in a fog for a moment..Her best friend of the office Dolores who worries about her soon introduces her to Mickael Grant a famous doctor at a party but Katie takes it very badly despite her attraction for this man when she finds out that Mickael grant was invited by her friend to determine her illness and as a result she falls into the stairs. Soon after she is forced to admit that her health is quite bad after a consultation at Dr Grant's who discovers that Katie has a malign brain tumor. He is left embarrassed not knowing if he must tell her the truth about her tumor or hide her the reality also because he fell in love with her patient.What does he have to do? Facing a terrible dilemma Mickael grant chooses to say nothing and give comfort and love to Katie who despite this heavy secret understands one day the horrible news.She is surprised,shocked and so angry that she dumps Mickael one late afternoon . Poor Mickael is desperate and thinks he has ruined the life of her patient and beloved..fortunately Katie makes her decision and gives him a chance for love and happiness.

Actually everything happens by stages in this story,Katie's attraction for Mickael,the operation and time at hospital,the hopes of a new life less dedicated to work and concentrated on Love and simple things like flowers,dinners ,the discovery of the truth soon after ,the fear,angerness and the desire to die and at last the choice to live and love Mickael fully and intensely whatever will happen given that time is money and every day is counted . I cried when i watched again this movie because the story is very sad but the performances are very good and the chemistry between Elizabeth Montgomery and Anthony Perkins is nice.We all guess what will become of this love since the beginning but that's not tragic and this film has a strong message. LIVE AND LIVE FULLY AS IF EACH DAY WAS THE LAST ONE ,don't waste any single minute of your life and show your love intensely because nothing is guaranteed and everything you have,job ,house and friends can disappear tomorrow. Liz Montgomery obviously wore a wig for the role of a woman operated from a cancer but i think it suited her and made her a totally new woman after the operation because an illness changes your mind and vision of life DEFINITELY.Elizabeth plays this woman both happy and tormented in a very realistic way and Anthony Hopkins is a sweetie but he is fair. He doesn't want to lose a single minute and love Katie intensely despite his sadness that explodes after a long retention.But as Katie tells him near the end : "Darling we fought together you and I till now,TILL NOW and we know what many people will never know in their lifetime."Because what does be alive mean? Does it simply means get up in the morning,go to work and have a daily routine or enjoy every day and every hour with the people we love and the things we cherish? This film gives the answer. I cried with Katie but she's right "No we're not tragic.We're not tragic!"Bravo Elizabeth Montgomery for this stunning performance.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Underrated!
Richardthepianist13 January 2009
I have seen BOTH Dark Victory versions..1939/1976..While Bette Davis undeniably gives the vibrancy and subtlety in 1939,one needs to view the 1976 version INTACT/UNEDITED over many years..as I have seen Elizabeth Montgomery's version over the last 30+ years,I have found that a "very good" movie is a subtle masterpiece with more realistic truth paced out quite beautifully throughout the film...the music,dialogue and overall non-dated performances of Ms. Montgomery and Anthony Hopkins has a far more natural rhythm that hold up much better than the 1939 version.. Time reveals all..for me,who much prefers the OLD classics,this 1976 Dark Victory is the best!
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Needless remake
roberts-117 July 2003
If you haven't seen the 1939 original with Bette Davis, this updated version of "Dark Victory" is a pretty good made-for-TV movie (I haven't seen it since the original TV showing in 1976, so I'm relying on my memory). Elizabeth Montgomery is always good, Anthony Hopkins did well in an early role, and the story will hold your interest.

However, if you have seen the original - forget this version (the same comment applies to the other remake of "Dark Victory" - the 1963 film "Stolen Hours" with Susan Hayward). Like most remakes, it doesn't compare to the "real thing". You can't improve upon a movie that was already perfect of its kind, and is an acknowledged classic of the cinema.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Under-Rated Remake
oceanhome-459838 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I have loved this movie from the first viewing.

Like many people, I'm a huge Davis fan.

However, I don't love her in everything. In most of her movies, she never completely submerges her personality into the characters she plays; we never quite forget it's Davis we're watching. She was trained in the theater and tends to overact. Perhaps it's discomfort with the given role; or just her outsize personality roaring it's way out of that tiny frame. She's splendid, but she's nearly always Bette.

I watched her version of this movie years ago bc I wanted to see how she handled the role. It was dramatic, noble, what was once called a "woman's picture." I hated it (although Bogie has an interesting role as a servant with a passable Irish brogue, believe it or not). She played the role on the knife-edge of hysteria, even before she knew her days were numbered. I was uncomfortable throughout and glad when it was finally over, for me and Bette.

It all just felt staged and artificial.

Ms. Montgomery's remake drew me in and never let go of my heart.

Her Katherine is a TV producer consumed by her job who ignores her headaches and blurred vision until a loss of balance at a party leads to a fall down a flight of stairs.

From there, the conclusion isn't hard to forsee.

The script is witty and well-written, and Ms. Montgomery and Anthony Hopkins as her doctor are unforgettable. (I was very young when I saw it, and it stayed with me since then.) The music and scenery are lovely. (But then, I'm easy to please. Give me a beach house with.a fireplace, a great score, and a romantic plot that's not too sappy, and I'm in.) Give this one a shot, and see if you agree.

P. S.--My husband watched it with me and liked it as well. It was more accessible for us than Bette's original.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
strangely emotionless
montgomerysue28 December 2022
Elizabeth Montgomery was a very talented and engaging actress, as demonstrated by her long run on "Bewitched," and several TV movies, for which she was nominated many times for Emmy awards but, remarkably, failed to win. "Black Widow Murders," "A Case of Rape," and "Lizzie Borden," were among the best. But here, TV decided to remake Bette Davis' "Dark Victory," and Susan Hayward's "Stolen Hours," with a script and direction that was strangely devoid of any emotional impact. Plus, Anthony Hopkins is very miscast here - there is very little chemistry between him and Montgomery, who struggles mightily with the weak material but, ultimately, can't save this from being a disappointing bore. It's a great story and superbly filmed by Davis in the 1930's and Hayward in the 1960's, where the scripts allowed those two great actresses to just shine in virtuoso performances, particularly Hayward in "Stolen Hours." A beautiful and memorable performance that leaves you emotionally fulfilled without being maudlin. Watch that one instead.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Elizabeth Montgomery in a remake of a Bette Davis Classic
Hoohawnaynay21 April 2003
While this is not a great TV movie it is a good re-working of the 1939 Bette Davis classic. The always beautiful and talented Liz Montgomery gives it her all playing a TV Producer stricken with a brain tumor. Liz plays a woman so consumed by her job that she ignores her personal life as well as her health. She ignores all the symptoms of her impending illness until she finally collapses at a cocktail party and falls down a few stairs. Once in the hospital she meets a doctor (Anthony Hopkins in an early role) who diagnoses her condition and eventually falls in love with her. What follows is kind of depressing as we all know where this is going to lead. Liz goes through all the emotions of dealing with her illness, surpise, frustration, anger, and also trying to deal with her love for a man who knows their time together is limited. Sad movie but if you are a diehard fan of Liz Montgomery like I am then you will enjoy it. Liz is quite sexy in the beginning but once she starts wearing an ugly short wig in the second part the reality of cancer really hits the viewer. All in all not a bad movie, just not on a par with Liz's "Lizzie Borden" or "Case of Rape".
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed