Siddhartha (1972)

8/10

Excellent movie, direction, acting and music

rcansaa31 January 2006

Warning: Spoilers

This excellent work(1972) of an American director Conrad Rooks made me fall in love with India and its spirituality all over again.

I am so glad I could borrow and watch this movie from a public library (Dow library in Midland Michigan). The cassette claims that it has been recovered in 2002. This movie is based on a Nobel prize winner novel by Hermann Hesse. The music composed and sung by Hemant Kumar who is well known for singing Tagore(Nobel winner). The song tracks are Tagore's compositions. Very melodious.

The story is about a young Brahman of a priest family. The father is a sacred priest of a temple. Next to the temple flows river Ganges. Siddharth grows up with his close friend/follower. Their early childhood is shown to be bathing in the river and performing rituals in the temple. Being fed-up with his father's routine life, Siddharth decides to get out of the town and wishes to become a 'sadhu' and attain nirvana (eternal-peace). His father consents half-heartedly. The best friend Govinda follows him like a shadow. During their journey they both come under the influence of many accomplished sadhus and a Guru. Inspite of serving the Guru, Siddharth is not satisfied and does not feel even being close to attaining nirvana. In the meantime Govind influenced by Buddha himself, joins Buddhism leaving Siddharth alone with his path. The main aspiration of Siddharth is to achieve nirvana without a teacher. He claims why do we need teachers to attain nirvana, a seemingly conflicting belief to Hinduism, which preaches without a Guru its impossible to attain eternal peace. Hinduism is esoteric and abstract. The conflicting facts are not conflicting at all..As Hinduism goes far and teaches that one is the God himself(or herself)..Aham Brahmasmi. At one stage a soul out-stands or out performs the teacher.

So he continues his wandering. In the meantime gets attracted to the pleasure gardens of a beautiful, soulful,courtesan by name Kamala. Siddharth wants to learn the art of love from her. She induces him into materialistic world. He learns all worldly business in order to gain the love of Kamala. Kamala, true to herself, teaches him all he wants. Eventually he gets tired of all of it and leaves that place to become a ferry man. During that time he learns a lot of philosophy from the river. Kamala who now has a son from Siddharth, gets bitten by a snake and dies in the arms of Siddharth. Siddharth tries to bring up his son but the son turns out to be defiant and so on and so forth...From the comment I learned that the ferryman who taught him about truth was none other than Budha himself.

The passionate scene between Shashi Kapoor and Simmy Grewal heats up the screen..I never had imagined that in the best hands of director and photographer, Shashi Kapoor could be so sizzling sensuous. I always find him boring and cold in almost all his movies..

The conversation between Kamala and Siddharth is very touching. After sharing a very passionate, artistic love making, both of them settle to think that they do not love each other. What a disappointment. Two people in true love, sometimes are unable to make passionate love due to situations and two people who after all share passionate physical love are not in love..what an irony of life..The consummation of love (passion + spiritual + commitment) happens only in imaginations ??? I hope not.

For Siddharth, the journey of spirituality is reverse (seem to happen to many people)..Its from "vairagya" (renunciation) to "bhoga" (materialistic luxury) and back again..Some simple men and women who follow simple philosophy and travel from bhoga to yoga and to nirvana(eternal peace), seem to be doing it right...However, there is nothing right and nothing wrong in this journey...Like a meandering river, we all trace(carve) different paths, suitable to our mind and our body. Also, the "chakras" control our actions at different points of time and determine at one point of time what is predominant for us.

The significance of ferryman is not an old concept. In Kannada literature(16th century ?), Purundara Dasa calls God as "ambiga" (ferryman)..God is the ferryman who helps cross this river called life and the ferry is our own body with nine holes. What an artist he must have been to help cross the river in such a perforated boat...:-) Coincidentally I remember this funny incident from Ramayana..Rama requesting a ferryman(kevat in Hindi) to help him cross river Ganga. Before Kevat lets him in his boat, runs and gets a pitcher of water to wash Rama's feet off..When asked why, he narrates the reason which seems so hilarious...He says, if I let you get in my boat with the dust of your feet, there is a fear that the boat may turn into a maid just like stone turning into Ahilya...thats why had to wash your feet..cause I have no other means of living ('main gareeb naiya meri naari naa hoya pade')...:-)

7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

8/10

Once you see this film, you can never unsee it!

bollywoodplusplus7 March 2015

What a movie!! What a hidden gem! Can't thank a friend (VNR) enough for recommending this film. Its the ultimate soul-searching movie. "Stop searching, stop worrying, give love! Live in present. Everything changes, everything returns"! Some deep Indian philosophy in the film, presented by non-Indians primarily! I find that amazing. The music of the film by Hemant Kumar works beautifully. Very simple, melodic, mostly Bengali. Haunting. Gels so well with the river, nature depicted in the film. "O re nadi" is my favorite. The entire film has a feel reminiscent of Satyajit Ray's film making. Brilliant production. Watch this film. It will stay with you for long. Maybe a lifetime.

4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

7/10

Not bad, but fails to capture the resplendence of the novel

DennisLittrell16 February 2007

No movie that is even marginally true to the story that Nobel Prize-winning German author Hermann Hesse told in his novel Siddhartha (1951) is without merit; and this modest film is no exception. The problem is, that while Conrad Brooks, who wrote, directed and produced the film, is true to the storyline of the novel and even in some respects true to the spirit of the novel, he fails to bring the power and the resplendence of Hesse's philosophic and spiritual masterpiece to the screen.

What made the novel one of the best ever written is the character of Siddhartha himself. Patterned after the Buddha both in temperament and in experience, Hesse's Siddhartha, "the Accomplished One," grew up amid extravagant wealth and privilege only to dump it all in an effort to find himself. Brooks fails almost immediately when he leaves out the scene from the book in which the young Siddhartha, not wanting to directly disobey his father (and to demonstrate his resolve) stands up all night waiting patiently for his father's permission to leave their splendid estates. This is one of the great "coming of age" scenes ever written and an early insight into Siddhartha's strength of character, but Brooks gives it barely a notice! Also skirted over too quickly are Siddhartha's years with the samanas in the forest where he practiced meditation and austerities. This part of Siddhartha's life was essential in making him the man he was and in showing us his character. He spent six years with the shamans and gurus of the forest (along with his companion Govinda) and in the end learned everything they knew and more, and yet had not found the answer he sought. (This parallels the experience of the "emaciated" Buddha.) Brooks does do the meeting with the Buddha well, having us hear his voice but not see him, and then follows that up with Siddhartha's reasons for not following the Buddha, even though he finds no fault with the Enlightened One's teachings. Note that without his actually meeting the Buddha, the life of Siddhartha (which is one of the traditional names of the Buddha) would so closely parallel that of the Buddha that some people might think that Hesse had written a profane life of the Buddha, which might not set well with some Buddhists! (Of course we all have the Buddha nature.) Siddhartha's life with the courtesan Kamala and the merchant Kamaswami and his spiral into debauchery and sloth is well depicted, although again the ultimate disillusionment that Siddhartha experienced is not as well presented as in the novel. Which brings me to Shashi Kapoor who plays Siddhartha. Although he would go on to be the veteran of well over a hundred films, and although he is appropriately enough Indian as well as tall, dark and handsome and a good actor, he fails to evoke the passion that Siddhartha must have. Siddhartha felt everything in a profound manner, even boredom was profoundly experienced by the Brahmin's prodigal son. Kapoor, especially near the end of the film when he plays an old man, occasionally made me feel that he could be "the Accomplished One," but more often he made me feel that he was holding something back.

Finally, the poetic scene near the end of the novel when, after living with and being guided by Vasudeva, the ferryman, Siddhartha becomes one with the river and falls spiritually into its wisdom, is only a bland shadow of what appears in the novel! Part of the reason for the failure probably has to do with a limited budget. The film is 83 minutes long, but could easily be twice that long. Part has to do with the selection of scenes and the emphasis on those scenes, and finally part of the reason has to do with the relative inexperience of Brooks who was only directing his second major film (and apparently his last). Certainly the on-location in India cinematography by Sven Nykvist who worked on so many films with Ingmar Berman is not to be faulted. Although not spectacular, Nykvist's camera conveys both the exotic beauty and the poverty of a landscape that could have been India 26 centuries ago.

(Note: Over 500 of my movie reviews are now available in my book "Cut to the Chaise Lounge or I Can't Believe I Swallowed the Remote!" Get it at Amazon!)

3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10/10

Finally on DVD. A beautiful rendition of Hesse's Siddhartha

gabravo12319 December 2002

After seeing this movie again in New York recently and noticing that it was going to be available on DVD, I ordered it immediately through Amazon.com and decided to send the following comments, which were posted in the "customer reviews" section:

1. The plot. The Nobel Prize winner, Hermann Hesse, wrote Siddhartha in 1922. It is a novel about Eastern spirituality (many Indian scholars consider it as one of the few successful examples of Indian philosophy presented by a Western author). Siddhartha is one of the names given to the Buddha himself. The novel narrates the pilgrimage of the son of a Brahmin, his struggle to find his own destiny; his friendship with Govinda (his "shadow"); his encounters with many different people: the Samanas (the ascetics that practice self-denial); Kamala (a courtesan who claims that she can teach and provide love as an art); Kamasawami (a rich merchant who becomes his boss); and Vasudeva... - note Vasudeva is another name given to Krishna, the teacher/driver of Arjuna in the Bhagavad-Gita).

2. The Movie. In 1972, Conrad Rooks (an almost unknown movie director who made "Chappaqua" in 1966) came out with a 94-minute movie transcription of Hesse's novel. He engaged Sven Nykvist (the famous Swedish cinematographer of Igmar Bergman) and a mainly Indian cast, including Shashi Kapoor (Siddhartha), Simi Garewal (Kamala), Romesh Sharma (Govinda) and Zul Vellani (Vasudeva). The beautiful music was composed by Hemanta Mukherjee (I hope the soundtrack will be available soon). It will be particularly enjoyable for those who have read the book. In many of the scenes the synergism produced by the photography, the music and the acting is superb. And with few exceptions, the movie is a good transcription of the book. The book and the movie became part of the "cult culture" of the West coast of the early seventies, but it never got the attention of the general public. With a condescending tone, Leonard Maltin refers to the movie as "too arty, but on-location photography ... is often dazzling".

After seeing the DVD transfer I was very happy with its high quality. There are 27 interesting minutes of comments made by Conrad Rooks about why and how he made the movie 30 years ago. With the DVD technology I am able to enjoy my favorite scenes and particularly the music of Hemanta Mukherjee on texts from another Nobel Prize, Rabindranath Tagore. Because of these unforgettable moments, I give a rating of 10, absolving Rooks from his "youth sins".

32 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10/10

A "biograph" of one mans`s journey on the most significant quest of all quests.

shane_eastwood25 October 2001

It would be easier to write the following comment if the copyright owners, made the film accessible to individual consumers...I`m trying to remember the thematics of this film!! I saw this film 2 years ago on the big screen. This film is far from being about a pointless quest, those are words of a mind that has lost the way , the way to self knowledge, through such questions as: "who am i?"" where did i come from?", and "where am i going?". These might seem irrelevant to the impatient mind but given ample time, the relevancy to all people will become very apparent. What this film conveys is one man`s journey on such a path of "self"knowledge. An indepth appreciation of indian thought or , philosophy or likewise may prove invaluable in terms of understanding , some of the seemingly fleeting or trivial scenes, or more culturally esoteric moments in the film, thus,enabling one to be more fully consummated by its story, however I am sure it is not a prerequisite for the artfully minded!. Among the the features of this film, is the music, of a musician singer who is legendary in India(I cant remember his name right now!)and is certainly legendary in this film, and is certainly a beautiful record of the 'Indian' spirituality alive and breathing to this day in India. If anyone can tell me where i can get the soundtrack or some compilation of the music in this film i would be very appreciative, (this request is a long standing one)

This film would appeal to those people who see or find or sense themselves on a similar"path" or quest, and may give much confirmation or food for thought about the possible turning points, or unknown or unexpected "detours" that one finds themselves engaged in along the way. This film offers a message, a very sound message about the quest of the human spirit its struggle for higher fulfillment, which i add Is the quest of the human being.

15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

For the beauty of it

sprengerguido11 May 2000

I used to love Hermann Hesse and this book in my teens. Still, I love this film, even because I consider it to be a very appropriate filming.

Hesse's characters are mostly soul-searchers wandering around in rather artificial surroundings - which is true in the case of this timeless, ancient India. As he is prone to put all the meaning into lengthy, philosophical dialogues, this makes him utterly difficult to turn into film.

This film manages to capture both: the artificiality of the setting as well as the philosophical sincereness - plus that certain naive sense of beauty that makes Hesse so appealing and disgusting at once. A good deal of the films success is due to Sven Nykvist's marvellous camera work, done mostly with natural light. (The few scenes with set light are awful.) The beauty of the landscapes is not only the superficial one of a postcard, but the philosophical one that tells you that a beautiful world is essentially a good, complete, happy world: a world in which you can afford to completely focus on your personal search for meaning and spirituality. Well, personally I don't believe this, but this movie had me suspending my belief for 90 minutes. What a comforting experience.

21 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

5/10

Strange Movie

prodosh_bhattacharya2 July 2009

Not having read Hesse's novel, I went to see this film during its first and controversy-plagued release in Calcutta in 1976, purely for the music composed by my idol Hemanta Mukherjee. The film was certified by the censors as fit 'For Adults Only'. By Indian standards, I can see why.

Regarding the music, 2 correspondents had flayed Hemanta Mukherjee in the Calcutta daily THE STATESMAN for having vulgarized Siddhartha's quest with two Bengali songs, each from a different, and earlier, Bengali film. True, one can wonder why Bengali in a film which has already used the convention of characters in ancient India speaking English. Imagine Achilles in TROY suddenly breaking into modern Greek while otherwise speaking English. However, the theme song on the river is unexceptionable contentwise. I am a little uneasy about the other song. Let us concede that for anyone who has seen the 2 Bengali films, the songs would come with their own distinct situational associations. This is my problem with the other song, as I had seen the Bengali original by the time I saw SIDDHARTHA.

Watching the film again in the late 1980s at the Penultimate Picture Palace, Oxford, I had to confess to a sneaking sympathy with my cousin, who, in 1976, had dismissed the film as 'pavement philosophy'. The narrative struck me as potentially pretentious and quite unconvincing in its pontifications at times.

The photography, however, is breathtaking,and the cast seem sincere in their performances. Incidentally, with reference to user gabravo123, at the PPP, Oxford, I think a bunch of Bengali students were the only viewers in a single row.Similar to his/her experience? However, the reason why not one of us moved as the closing credits rolled is because we were all mesmerized by the divine voice of Hemanta. For gabravo123's information, the two songs have been available on a 45 rpm disc since the late 70s, only there is no reference to the film on the disc. It is just titled HEMANTA KUMAR. They, I'm sure, are available now on CDs of the singer-composer's film songs. Incidentally, why does gabravo123 mention Rabindranath Tagore? I hope s/he is not implying that Tagore has anything to do with the lyrics, both of which are by the late Gouriprasanna Majumdar.

4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10/10

An excellent philosophical work

pinoj183 February 2005

I saw the movie Siddhartha some time ago because when I first saw the title, I recognized it as a philosophical work from my college days when I study Hesse's work from my philosophy class.

It is a great film: I enjoyed it as much as I enjoyed the book by Hermann Hesse. As a philosophy major, the philosophical underlinings in the movie are most appropriate. It is by all accounts, a true Hesse's commentary on the meaning of life and man's condition on earth.

I especially liked the music although the lyrics were foreign to me. I wish I could get a translation of the songs that made the film even more enjoyable.

A great philosophical work of art.

16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

5/10

A work of fiction

jackrthom9 May 2022

I was expecting a semi documentary about Siddhartha Gautama who became the Buddha but the only similarity is that it's filmed in India and uses the same name.

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Hauntingly Beautiful

yespat4 March 2003

This film is stunning in its beauty. The music is transcendent. For the longest time I tried to get the soundtrack. To save you the trouble, be aware that they never made one! There is one scene in which a woman blows on a shell that was so powerful I still remember 30 years later. Mesmerizing. If you have not seen it yet, rent it today.

19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10/10

a beautiful and haunting movie

movinut6 May 2005

I saw the movie twice, the first time in Sweden in 1974; I had read Herman Hesse's book before that, and the story had strongly impressed me. The movie was even better then the book! the photography was very poetic, the music (indian flutes, tablas) was very high in the aesthetics band, and the story conformed more or less with the book, but without taking away any of it's impact. there were 12 people in the theatre, and at the end as the credits were scrolling for what seemed at least 20 minutes, no-one moved from their seats as transfixed by what they had just seen. I am sure that all 12 of those people recall to this day the effect that this film created on them. I am not a Buddhist or even very religious, but i personally recommend it as part of a person's education in life....

9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10/10

Beautiful film of a story which plays in Buddha's time.

gunther407 June 2000

Warning: Spoilers

Story in legend form of a Brahmin's son at the times of The Buddha who sets out on a journey to find himself. He tries living with the samanas, an ascetic sect, then with the followers of Buddha, but decides that he cannot follow any particular path which he has not found and experienced by himself. He crosses the river, the symbol of the division between the realm of the spirit and the realm of nature/life. After he has experienced the life in the city and become a successful business man, he returns to the river. If you want to be a complete human, you need to integrate the realm of the spirit with the realm of life. Siddhartha becomes the ferryman, the facilitator, on the river who enables others to share in his own experience by traveling back and forth between the two river banks which symbolize spirit and nature. The film does a beautiful job with stunning photography. The original English version with its archaic language often strikes the modern viewer as somewhat odd. The recent German version includes dubbed German which was edited skillfully by Ursula Michels-Wenz. The film is distributed in Europe by Winkler Films of Vienna, Austria. The German publisher of Hesse's works, Suhrkamp Verlag of Frankfurt, presently is still limiting a wider distribution and the release of a video version.

6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1/10

This is how you massacre literature

RomeoQuint7 November 2020

Dont want to write a long review, but this is exactly how you massacre literature:

by completly disregarding spiritual / character development moments
by not having any transitions between scenes / by not connecting them in any kind
by choosing wrong pieces for the puzzle that is film
by focusing too long on less important moments / characters and disregarding important characters
by not devivering the obvious message in the book
by not having any interessting / memorable shots (i really don't understand it, with such capable DP)
by making powerful moments absolutely cringy
leaving me thinking thinking that even beginner film-students would deliver a more consistent / coherent / impactful film

1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

9/10

A classic.

wildzero26 January 2004

If you loved the book by Hermann Hesse, you will most likely love this film. At times, it seems rather disjointed - almost as though I had blinked and missed a scene. I really consider this film to be a great companion to a great book. I am curious to know what people who had not read the book would think of this film.

11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1/10

This Movie was TERRIBLE

izztek9 May 2008

Warning: Spoilers

I read the novel Siddhartha and found it to be a very interesting, and good book.

In class today, we watched this film. It was just awful. Everyone in the class was laughing every five minutes because of how terrible both the acting and filming was.

The filming is dreadful. One second you'll see Siddhartha talking, and then it will randomly transition into some five second scene of a bird flying, or someone saying something random and irrelevant to the plot.

There is a scene where Kamala gets bit by a snake--you don't even see the snake bite her. You just see her scream this ear-piercing and unnatural scream and fall to the ground--it was possibly the worst acting of any scene in any movie I've ever seen.

Seriously, this movie is awful. I read the book and loved it, so did many of my AP Literature classmates, but not a single person in the room enjoyed the movie--they all laughed because of how terrible and random it was.

Siddhartha searched to find the realms of enlightenment--this movie searched the realms of stupidity and terrible acting, and succeeded.

2 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

National Geographic search for enlightment is a step down from "Chappaqua"

Chris Knipp26 July 2002

This is much smoother but less interesting than Conrad Rooks' other earlier and more cultish film, his drug autobiography `Chappaqua' (1966), which has cameos by Allen Ginzburg, William Burroughs, and jazzman Ornette Coleman in it. The trouble is `Siddhartha,' beautiful as it is, is a simplification of a simplification, and a spiritual quest isn't something you necessarily understand better through lush visuals, though unquestionably some of Sven Nykvist's watery landscapes with trees are unforgettable, the color is deep and rich, the music is pleasing, and the principals are awfully good looking people. Not surprisingly the high point cinematically is the sequence showing erotic encounters between the handsome lapsed sadhu, Siddhartha (Shashi Kapoor), and the lovely courtesan, Kamala. Simi Garewal, who plays Kamala, is a gorgeous creature whose lovely eyes, long aristocratic nose, and pouty lips remind one of the all-time arch teaser and sexy sophisticate of English films, Joan Greenwood. But Ms. Greenwood never was got up in the kind of exquisite gilded see-through gear Simi wears in her scenes with Shashi Kapoor. She's something to look at.

When his buddy Govinda decides earlier to follow the Buddha, Siddhartha leaves Govinda bereft by deciding to go off on his own lone search, without a guru. It seems that the point is you must pursue your quest on your own. But Siddhartha's splitting with Govinda seems somewhat meaningless since at the end of the movie, Siddhartha has joined up with the peaceful boatman he met years earlier toward the end of his sadhu period, and he winds up spouting the boatman's words of wisdom: live in the present, stop seeking, don't worry, be happy, and watch the river. The Buddha apparently hasn't helped Govinda all that much either, since he meets Siddhartha again and also needs to be taught the boatman's simple doctrines. One can't help thinking they'd both have done better staying with the Buddha, who did, after all, found one of the world's great religions.

It's rather amusing that during the two men's youthful sadhu period, when they're on the road with a group of penniless holy men, `meditation' is represented as singing rhythmically and passing a bong. My picture of this activity was different, but `Chappaqua' shows how obsessed with and involved in drugs Conrad Rooks was.

This is a lovely, but empty and ultimately not very cinematic film. Sven Nykvist's photography is at the service of a vision so generalized (Siddhartha is a universal type, not an individual), that too often the images look like something out of `National Geographic' with mise-en-scène by Bollywood. The scenes are not as exotic as those Pasolini created for his `Arabian Nights' (1974), nor are Rooks' depictions of Indian rural life ever remotely as real as Satyajit Ray's in the `Apu Trilogy.' For a trippier film version of Hermann Hesse, see Fred Haines' `Steppenwolf,' which came two years after `Siddhartha,' in 1974. For a more original film depiction of a spiritual quest, see the story of G.I. Gurdjieff as done by Peter Brooks in `Meetings with Remarkable men' (1979).

17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10/10

Only for esoteric people.

morales28 December 2000

The theme of siddharta, is the very special searching of meaning of life. The movie even in some ways can be better than the book,because give the viewers more imagination about the representation of the agony looking for the meaning of life. Siddhartha is a brahaman, so is a man with great wealth, is not a simple ignorant person looking for the meaning of life. He renounces all the wealthiest things to look for the real treasures of life,that is the metaphisican undertanding of life. The movie for somebody that is familiar with esoterism has a lot of meaning,for the general public:"We never see the transformation and....-comment of Canberra,Australia-"; not understanding at all.

6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

9/10

this was surely better than I expected

immolation11 January 2008

Warning: Spoilers

Well, I am a big Hermann Hesse fan and found this to be a very good representation of the book, it definitely got main ideas across to say the least. Although with every book-to-movie it misses out on at least a few details... but I mean, I have no real complaints.

I would definitely recommend this film to any Hermann Hesse fans, or even anyone interested in spirituality or Buddhism.

I do wonder why it's received such a low score though, I am guessing many people never read the book or are not familiar with H.H.

In any case, compared to most modern day films this was actually captivating and had a heart to it.

2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

5/10

turn off the sound

roedyg18 May 2012

I have always been very interested in the life of the Buddha, so I was looking forward to this movie. It was quite a disappointment. The movie was made in 1972, modelling the fortune cookie, stilted dialogue from Charleton Heston in The Ten Commandments, Richard Burton in The Robe, and presaging Alec Guiness as Obi-Wan Kenobi in Star Wars. The beauty of the movie is the misty panoramas of the quiet river. It such a beautiful peaceful world prior to the invention of machines. The crude makeup to show Siddhartha ageing reminded me of many a Monty Python sketch. There are some embarrassing long sex scenes. I left the room. They just felt cheap and tacked on porn, only marginally to do with the flow of the movie. The movie might have worked better with the sound off and subtitles to disguise just how stilted, turgid, corny and idiotic the dialogue is. "Everything returns" is passed off as transcendental wisdom.

1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

8/10

An old fairytale about a pointless quest

Spleen2 October 1999

Siddhartha is a young man who leaves home and sets out on a long search for the meaning of life. He's like a many protagonists from folklore, who've sought immortality, perfect honesty or whatever - he's engaged on a quest for something that doesn't exist and isn't worth finding, which WE could have told him at the very beginning; but of course he must find out for himself. His character matches that of his counterparts in folklore. He's a nice chap, a bit obsessive, very clever - but on the one point that motivates him he's exceptionally dense. He does so much navel-gazing that when tragedy touches him we're surprised he even notices. Don't let this put you off. You'll like him all the same.

(By the way, although Siddhartha's character is much the same at the end as it is at the beginning, there is a brief unconvincing montage that shows him corrupted by worldly values. We never see the transformation and it's hard to believe that it could possibly have taken place.)

The India in which the story takes place is timeless (albeit convincingly solid), although we soon find out that Siddhartha is a contemporary of Buddha, who he meets but who doesn't appear in the film. (It's a kind of Buddhist `Ben-Hur'.) I thought this was a nice touch; but the intrusion of real world creeds is indeed an intrusion. One problem with this kind of story is that the audience is really just waiting for the hero to realise that he's chasing a rainbow's end, and speaking for myself I'd prefer to watch the hero's life, rather than listen to empty platitudes and claptrap, while I wait. But I must say the platitudes have been very prettily dressed up. Hesse or Rooks or whoever is responsible had a great gift for making nothing sound like something.

Photography is gorgeous and the gentle editing lulls us into accepting the fairytale. There's a lovely smorgasbord of Indian music. (SOME of this music you're bound to like - it's much too varied for any one person to dislike it all.) It's not an arresting film, but it's a sweet and guileless one. Try to see it under circumstances that best allow you to absorb the sights and sounds.

4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

2/10

Buddha was Born in Nepal not India

romanshrestha-2167616 July 2017

Buddha was born In Nepal not in India. How can they depict it as a story of young Indian. Serious attack on the existence of Nepalese. Very much disappointed by the movie description. India should claiming India as birthday place of Siddhartha Gautam Buddha because it is not. The real facts have to be depicted only if they are sure about it. I hate when wrong message is being spread so confidently.

1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

8/10

Captures the essence of the novel

sgraf_x1 October 2008

Its been years and years since I read the book in school. Which for me was a big deal cause I never read any of the books they assigned. But for some reason I read this and it was probably the first book I ever read cover to cover that wasn't a comic. I can remember always liking the story and it has stayed with me all these years. I rented this as a DVD recently never knowing that there was even a film adaptation. Im glad I did. For me it was everything I remembered feeling when I read the book. I cant really speak to whether it is a faithful representation of the book at this point but I can tell you that it is absolutely faithful to the spirit of the it.

The film is very elegant and the story remains relevant and inspiring. It is beautifully shot and scored. The one problem with the film was the editing. It tends to be choppy and disruptive to the continuity of the story. It also jumps drastically forward in time at several points. If you have read the book than its not really a problem but for someone who has not it may be.

Even at 1 hour and 20 minutes the film still feels epic in scope as it explores Siddharthas lifelong journey to find life's meaning and ultimately delivers a timeless message about the nature of the human condition.

There is No Gene for the Human Spirit.

I Can Think, I Can Wait and I Can Pray.

1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Nice Cinematography

MicroGlyphics27 March 2003

...other than that no redeeming features. I didn't realise that this had been made circa 1972. I thought it was a new release in 2003. I thought it felt dated (and now I know why). The pace of the film was slow, and the acting...well, it was sort of like watching a high school play.

Nice message, though, even if a little "preachy."

2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10/10

Conrad Brook's Siddhartha

Pratik11231 August 2006

I first saw this movie in a cinema and then later on television and then on video. Based on the novel by Herman Hesse, its Siddhartha, a young Brahmin from a rich family goes in search of "nirvana" with his friend, Govinda. During this time he spends time with some Sadhus from Hrishikesh but still finds that his mind is not at peace and they both continue their journey in search of nirvana. They then meet Gautam Siddharth, the Buddha and for a while follow him and his preachings. But this is where the two friends split and Siddhartha continues his journey in search of of nirvana during which he crosses the Ganges and meets Kamala, the lovely courtesan with whom he has an affair with, She introduces him to a rich merchant. Eventually Siddhartha, finding that his mind is still not at peace, leaves his job after becoming wealthy, and also leave Kamala and returns to the the Ganges. There he meets the ferryman, who had earlier helped him to cross the river. There he remains and helps the ferryman.

The scenery in the film is just superb and this is most effective when shown Siddhartha standing in a dark room and fasting until his father permits him to leave. The scenery and the dialogues are superbly used in semiotic terms. The script is very well written and the acting by Bollywood actors, Shashi Kapoor as Siddhartha, Simi Garewall as Kamala, Romesh Sharma as Govinda and Pinchoo Kapoor as the rich merchant, Kumaraswami, is very good and each one of them is able to show their versatility.

This is worth to watch film.

0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1/10

Very Very very Very Bad Movie from very Great Novel.

rupanisp23 November 2002

His Excellency Great Late Hemant Kumar had two bengali songs in this movie which are very very melodic.

Her Excellency Simi Garewal did best start nudity on screen. His Excellency Shashi Kapoor played ok under very bad direction. It should be remade.

Very Very Very Bad Movie. Please remake it again properly with better music and art form.

1 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

User Reviews

See also

Opinion

Details

Storyline

Did You Know?

Photo & Video

Related Items

User Lists

Recently Viewed