Fireball Forward (TV Movie 1972) Poster

(1972 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
maybe some casualties but not a lost war
KDWms28 November 2003
Looks like the proponents of this film could use a little help. OK. Here it comes... Not being much of a historian, and stupid about discards from other pictures, I am unable to evaluate it with these things in mind. Perhaps this lesser intelligence accounts for my being entertained by this flick. It's about a newly-transferred General who concludes that somebody with access to his Command Post is tipping off the Germans with regard to his division's movements. I was not distracted by any inferiority in the easily-seen stuff, such as the acting, sound, lighting, writing, etc. Therefore, I was intrigued by the effort here to identify the source of the "leak". I, for one, would say that FIREBALL FORWARD (which refers to the nickname of the headquarters of the top brass) is worth reconning, and is no more of a gamble as to whether you'll like it or not, than most other movies.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
So-so and run-of-the-mill TV wartime movie concerning an experienced general assigned to a new division
ma-cortes23 January 2022
A made-for-TV flick regarding a cunning officer to discover a traitor, this Fireball Forward deals with a tough general to carry out a new mission . Along the way , he suspects that there is a Nazi sympathizer in his ranks , and dedicates himself to ferreting out the mole . The final part there's a bit of action, to discover the culprit and avoid wreck havoc against his subordinates and then run for their lives . The first half of the film allows the colorful cast of character actors to have their fun as they get their tails whipped into shape and develop shaky relationship with their leader Ben Gazzara . The message here isn't that war is hell. Rather, it seems to be: war can be a hell of a good time... if you've got nothing to lose . The dangerous missions include numerous group formed by a motley and diverse bataillon played by all-star cast .

In this rugged WWII movie , Ben Gazzara ssumes the role of the hard-nose leader of a garrison , as he's assigned by the Military Staff to take over a division with a bad combat record . He is a fictional American general , a two-fisted and stubborn officer who's more pattered as a rough sergeant than as a strict general . It's an ordinary wartime classic movie professionally directed by Marvin Chomsky and being scripted by prestigious Edmund H. North . This moving film packs suspense , intrigue , thriller and buck-loads of explosive action in some spectacular battles , mostly being stock footage . It was actually the 2-hour pilot for an unsold television series. The noisy action limited to a few battles , being uniformly well-made, especially deserving of mention the rip-roaring final scenes , including some spectacular shootouts and bombing . Apart from the values of team spirit , cudgeled by Ben Gazzara as a demanding general obviously patterned on Old Blood and Guts into his misfit team , the film is full of overtalking in barracks , feats , suspense and thrills . Rough Ben Gazzara is good as leader of the motley division together thwart the Nazi schemes and find out a traitor who is informing to enemy , as well as the large secondary cast with special mention for Ricardo Montalban , Eddie Albert , Dana Elcar , Edward Binns , Morgan Paull , L. Q. Jones , Loretta Swit , Richard Yniguez , Kenneth Tobey and Anne Francis plays a military journalist but with no romatic interest .

Produced in short budget by Frank McCarthy , in fact , including outtakes and stock footage from the 1970 Oscar-winner Patton that utilized to flesh out this film , as Frank produced other warlike films as MacArthur , Single-Handed , Decision before dawn and the succesful Patton . The motion picture was regular but professionally directed by Marvin J. Chomsky . He was a director who often used to work for Television , shooting notorious series as Peter the Great , Anastasia , Roots , Billionaire Boys Club, Strauss Dynasty and Holocaust . He got several prices , as he commented that he had won the awards for directing projects about events that "never should have happened." One of his projects was about the Holocaust : Holocausto¨(1978) , one was about the Attica prison riot : ¨Attica¨ (1980) , one about Kennedy : ¨Robert Kennedy and His Times , regarding Argentina leader ¨Evita¨ and the Emmy he was accepting was for a project about the Nazis in Germany ¨Insde the Third Reich¨. Fireball Forward(1972) Rating : 5/10 , mediocre . Only for WWII hardcore enthusiasts.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Edmund H. North
JohnDishwasher21 July 2019
I tracked this down and watched it on YouTube because of its writer Edmund H. North. I'm watching all of his movies and he delivers again with this tight well-paced story. There is a little over-acting and the battle scenes slowed the movie's forward momentum, but that's not on him. The dude wrote scifi, noir, westerns, war movies and more. He can tell a good story in any genre. I thought Gazarra was great in this. The surprise appearance by Loretta Switt before she was famous was fun.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fireball Forward as suspense.
ediethompson5714 May 2001
I think you all missed the point! The premise of the movie is to try to guess who the traitor is--the one who is betraying their next moves to the enemy. That is where I get my enjoyment; from the suspense. And as far as the suspense went, it was terrific!!
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This is NOT an academy award winner!!!
VicWhy22 October 1998
With a little dressing up, this movie could be served for Thanksgiving dinner. Not only is is boring, implausible, historically inaccurate and poorly directed, the best actors were the bit players (mainly because they had so few lines to say). A waste of time, even for war fanatics.
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A waste of time.
tommyson5 March 1999
I have to admit I was deceived by the title and the summary on the back of the box. So I popped it in the vcr and kept waiting... and waiting... and waiting for something good to happen. But of course, it never does. The makers of this film should be tied to a chair and made to watch "Saving Private Ryan". Maybe they would learn something.
1 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I thought it was pretty good.
kindeyes18 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Lets give everyone a minor TV history lesson. they used to have something made by the major TV channels called a TV Movie. This was one of them. It was made on a shoe string budget with the combat action being made up of stock footage from the big screen feature movie "Patton". One of the things you also have to remember is the political climate of the time. It was anti orthodox, anti Vietnam and anti military. So a General who was a mustang;it means to become a officer thru the ranks rather than thru West Point; and did not want to throw a enlisted man to the rear area paperwork lions because he ran away, at least not till he finds out why and in the process finds out he has a mystery on his hands and a big time security leak that he must fix before his battalion goes back into combat against the Germans.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The human elements of the war are more powerful here than the mission.
mark.waltz5 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A great performance by the always commanding Ben Gazzara and a sensitive subplot dealing with a shell shocked soldier threatened with court martial during a war helps raise this often tedious World War II TV movie to a decent level, although overall, I wasn't really too interested in the goings on.

Gazzara steps in as a general to help turn a troubled troop around, and he finds the morale to be very low to the point of nearly no return. He goes up against Dana Elcar in regards to aiding Morgan Paull from the court martial, showing a humanity that obviously the previous commander didn't have.

Performances by Eddie Albert and Ricardo Montalban are good, involving the less personal story of the troop's issue with saboteurs, finding the culprit a little too close to home, and revealing some dark truths about why loyalties go certain ways during a war. It's slow and tedious at times, just one of many later war movies that doesn't really give any new insight to why we fight, but Paull's story certainly is touching.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Aside from its pinkness, well worth seeing.
planktonrules30 May 2020
"Fireball Forward" was apparently intended as a pilot for a potential television series. And, like so many of these pilots, it ended up playing at a movie of the week on television. Sometimes this was done to see how the public responded to the film...in case they might want to give the series a go ahead. Sometimes they knew that the show would never be made but they showed the movie just to get some use out of them. I'm not sure which was the case with "Fireball Forward".

The film begins with General Barrett (Ben Gazzara) receiving a medal for his excellent work. However, this success is a double-edged sword, as now they have a new assignment for the general....to whip a demoralized and hard-luck division into shape. And, after more losses, it becomes apparent that perhaps someone is informing the Germans of the division's plans...which would explain the repeated defeats.

Like too many old made for TV movies on YouTube, the print for "Fireball Forward" is poor. Not only is it a bit blurry but there's a strong pink cast to the show! Yep...pink soldiers! I cannot blame the movie for this...just the ravages of time and a need for conservation!

So is this any good? Well, with Ben Gazzara and many other excellent actors, the film can't be bad! While not a household name now, Gazzara was an incredibly good actor...well respected back in the day. And, the script is interesting...quite unusual and it manages to make this less a war film and more a mystery-suspense film that just happens to be set in wartime. Well worth seeing.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Performances over Action
gary-646598 March 2017
I can't remember having seen this wartime mystery thriller since the Seventies, but I loved having the great performances throughout recalled to me as I just rewatched it yesterday on Youtube. It's one great result they have obtained here, the level of drama not limited at all by the TV-level budget. Naturally the special effects are at a minimum and I value it all the more for that.

Ben Gazzara is tops in the kind of authoritative role he was best at -- a dogface who made it up tomajor general through field promotions -- adding charismatic color andnever falling into the trap of leaning back on their laurels as the likes of staple character stars Ernest Borgnine, Robert Ryan or Carroll O'Connor sometimes did in "bigger" war movies of the day. Eddie Albert is good as always in an ambiguous role, Ricardo Montalban very good, along with Dana Elcar, L.Q. Jones and others in what must be called an ensemble effort. Even Morgan Paull, a lesser-known juvenile second lead of the day, added to the whole as a shell-shocked corporal. For this, a theme too deep for today's TV-watchers, and the excellent pacing and plot, I give it an unreserved 9/10 as an absorbing way to pass an hour and a half.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hey, we've got all this footage from these movies left over . . .
Mr. OpEd22 February 2002
This is out on Video? They're showing it on TNT? Wasn't it banned by the People of America with Good Taste, Nebraska Chapter? It is truly a sad film, NOT that the premise of having a roving military guy investigating and fixing problems from Europe to the Pacific wasn't (isn't) a neat idea. Ah, the siren call of good premises.

I, unlike you recently fooled renters, saw the thing on ABC when it first aired. I remember reading that they had so much left over (unused) footage from both Patton and Tora Tora Tora (both 20th Century Fox) that they could keep the series going for years. Those two great WWII movies still remain great to this day, but Fireball Forward (who came up with that title?). Nah! You can probably tell the Patton footage as it looks terrific while the rest of this "special" is lit like a TV movie, which of course is what it is.

It never became a series, just this two-hour "pilot." Back yourself away from Fireball Forward. It hurts!
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It really stinks!!!!!!!!
navyray11 November 1998
One of the worst war flicks I have ever seen. It was on TNT the day before Veterans Day. With so many good war movies out there why did they choose to show this mess. I only watched the entire movie in hopes that it would get better, it didn't!
0 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed