The Vampire Lovers (1970) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
112 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Bold and Sexy Vampire Movie
claudio_carvalho26 August 2014
In Styria, Austria, General von Spielsdorf (Peter Cushing) gives a party and a countess explains to him that she needs to travel immediately to visit a relative that is ill. She leaves her daughter Marcilla (Ingrid Pitt) under the care of the General. Marcilla befriends his daughter Laura (Pippa Steele) and then the teenager has nightmares, where she is attacked by a dreadful creature. The doctor finds that Laura is anemic and soon she dies.

Marcilla leaves the house and the countess fakes a carriage accident to leave Marcilla, now known as Carmilla, with the wealthy Mr. Roger Morton (George Cole). Camilla befriends Emma Morton (Madeline Smith) and soon she starts having nightmares. Her governess Madame Perrodot (Kate O'Mara) is seduced by Carmilla and helps her to be close to Emma. Mr. Morton travels and the butler Renton (Harvey Hall) and the doctor suspect that Madame Perrodot might be a vampire but they do not suspect of Carmilla. Will Emma be saved from Carmilla?

"The Vampire Lovers" is a bold and sexy vampire movie by Hammer with the right dose of eroticism. In 1970, lesbianism was not a usual theme and a lesbian vampire was a novelty. This is the first time that I see a vampire associated to a shroud. The plot explores the sensuality of Ingrid Pitt and her female victims but is never sexploitation. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Carmilla, A Vampira de Karnstein" ("Carmilla, The Karnstein's Vampire")

Note: Last time I had seen this movie was on 07 December 2002.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Who wouldn't love these vampires???
Coventry26 November 2004
Where would the horror field be if it weren't for the legendary Hammer Studios? With their constant creativity and new variations on the general topic of vampirism they delivered some of the most important genre-films ever. Roy Ward Baker's film the Vampire Lovers is one of the most essential movies Hammer ever released and it meant a landmark turning point for the sub-genre of bloodsuckers. Due to THIS film, vampirism afterwards always got immediately associated with eroticism and lust. The Vampire Lovers influenced notorious directors like Jess Franco (Vampyros Lesbos, Les Avaleuses) or Jean Rollin (Lips of Blood, The Living Dead Girl) who practically made an entire career out of lesbian vampire movies. But this is the real thing! A stunning screenplay, based on a classic tale by Sheridan Le Fanu, solid acting performances and an atmospheric – almost dreamlike – photography. Ingrid Pitt plays the best, most memorable role of her career as the gypsy vampire Carmilla. Her sensual character seduces attractive young girls at the homes of prominent men where she's at guest and turns them into weak, lifeless slaves. The worried men have to uncover the origin of this vampire wench in order to destroy her forever.

'The Vampire Lovers' offers a nearly perfect combination of atmosphere, beauty and tension. Mostly thanks to the female cast led by Ingrid Pitt, this is the most bewitching horror tale Hammer ever told. The ravishing naked bodies of Pitt, Madeline Smith (Theathre of Blood) and Kate O'Mara (Horror of Frankenstein) will give this film a spot in your memory forevermore. And that's not a sexist remark; it just needs to be said. Other than the charismatic female appearances, this production also depends a lot on the eerie set pieces and the nightmarishly dark images of graveyards, ruins and castles. Overall, a splendid horror film and a must see for all fans of Hammer, vampirism or gorgeous beauties.
58 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lush gothic Hammer horror with Ingrid Pitt, Madeline Smith and Peter Cushing
Wuchakk4 August 2018
RELEASED IN 1970 and directed by Roy Ward Baker, "The Vampire Lovers" is a Hammer horror based on Irish novelist Sheridan Le Fanu's "Carmilla," which was published in 1872 and predated Bram Stoker's "Dracula" by 25 years. The story concerns a family of vampires, the Karnsteins, who prey on people in Austria by finding an excuse to leave their daughter at a rich manor. She then proceeds to patiently seduce the nubile woman of the abode as she drinks the blood of local peasant lassies and whomever else.

The main antagonist, Carmilla/Marcilla Karnstein, is played by Ingrid Pitt, who's effective, but a little too long-in-the-tooth for the role. While she prefers to prey on wealthy nubile girls and there are overt Sapphic undertones, she's just as willing to suck the blood of dudes when it suits her diabolic purposes. Her pretense of passionate romantic love is just that as she's intrinsically evil and referred to as a "devil" elsewhere in the movie. Make no mistake, she's solely out to find and feed off victims.

While vampires are fantastical, Carmilla is figurative of evil women who purpose to seduce or convert people and destroy them. This IS real life and I've seen it happen several times. The tale isn't for immature audiences because it's too convoluted, dramatic, weighty and mature. I saw it 15 years ago and wasn't impressed but, seeing it again, I now grasp it and it's virtually revelatory.

The female cast is superb, rounded out by: Madeline Smith (Emma), Pippa Steel (Laura), Kate O'Mara (The Governess, aka Mme. Perrodot), Janet Key (Gretchin, the maid), Kirsten Lindholm (the blonde vampire in the opening; also shown later), Olga James (Village Girl), Joanna Shelley (Woodman's Daughter) and Dawn Addams (The Countess/Karnstein matriarch). There's a little bit of tasteful top nudity and Pitt is shown totally nude on two occasions in a classy manner. She's a beautiful woman, for sure, but she doesn't trip my trigger.

As far as the male cast goes, Peter Cushing has a side role and Jon Finch is on hand as the gallant hunk. There are others.

FYI: "The Vampire Lovers" is the first part of the so-called Karnstein Trilogy, which includes the quasi-sequel "Lust for a Vampire" (1971) and the prequel "Twins of Evil" (1971).

THE MOVIE RUNS 1 hour, 31 minutes and was shot in Hertfordshire, England.

GRADE: B+/B
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The vampire legend get the sex treatment from Hammer Studios
augiedog24 December 1999
Hammer Studios speeds up to the more sexually explicit times with Vampire Lovers, a sleek, beautifully filmed atmospheric filming of the vampire tale Carmilla by Sheridan Le Fanu. This wonderfully done film combines the traditional vampire legend with the more permissive sexual standards of the 70's resulting in a sensual yet frightening version of this well crafted story. Ingrid Pitt is breathtakingly beautiful & sensual as the main character Carmilla. She is the human embodiment of a sexually charged feline, and Peter Cushing is appropriately sincere as her nemesis The General. This film singlehandedly established Ingrid Pitt as the reigning queen of vampirism in the 70's. Vampire Lovers is well worth the time for a viewing.
44 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The last good Hammer movie?
funkyfry27 February 2004
Certainly a movie one would use the word "good" for rather than "great", but this movie does contain flashes of the unique attributes that made Hammer such a winner in the first place but which had been largely forgotten by the company in its rush to replicate the success of "One Million Years B.C." with cheap imitations. Ingrid Pitt is probably the film's greatest asset, along with the very well done sets and art design in general.

Pitt plays a vampire lesbian who uses various forms of deception to seduce the daughters of England's upper crust. She comes off great in the role of seductress and is just barely convincing enough as the "innocent" her character pretends to be.

Cushing makes only 2 brief appearances, not making much of an impression (but he's given very little to work with here in a role that just about anyone could have played).

Memorable, not as good as Hammer's best vampire film "Dracula" (aka "Horror of Dracula", US) but definately one of its better, if not its best, films of the 70s.
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the Best Vampire films--Excellent Telling of the Carmilla Tale
stuthehistoryguy10 September 1999
_The Vampire Lovers_ is one of the most faithful adaptations of a story I have ever seen in a major production. Based on J. Sheridan LeFanu's _Carmilla_, Baker's film captures the essence of evil wrapped in feminine beauty. Ingrid Pitt plays Mircalla with great restraint; her character comes off cold and deceptive, but still driven by a need for love. The action is well timed and choreographed, and the nudity, though a bit gratutious at times, is photographed sensitively and with great appreciation for the actresses.

Yes, this is something of a guilty pleasure because of the leads' beauty, but if one looks beyond the titilation, the story, photography, and performances in _The Vampire Lovers_ hold up very well indeed! 8 out of 10.
25 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lives up to its reputation
ebeckstr-15 July 2023
As a million other people have noted, this is not only a solid entry in the long-running Hammer vampire cycle, but an interesting piece of film history as well. Just as the original Hammer Dracula pushed the boundaries of censorship and cinema by confronting audiences with the very first color vampire film, The Vampire Lovers brought Hammer into the even looser censorship standards of the 70s with lots of nudity, including nearly full frontal, and unflinching lesbianism. Lesbianism and all, the film is a somewhat faithful adaptation of Le Fanu's novella, Camilla. Surely, that content is the main reason Hammer adapted the story to begin with.

The cast is solid, and we are treated to the incomparable Peter Cushing in a secondary, though pivotal, role of an uncle grieving the loss of his niece from a mysterious illness. The pacing never bogs down, and there are some nifty shots of fog swirling through graveyards and around castle foundations.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hammer Vampiric Legacy: Cushing vs Carmilla
Dkish8 June 2023
Based on the classic 1873 gothic novel, CARMILLA, this Hammer vampire film features an aristocratic female vampiress and her family seducing traveling nobles. Peter Cushing returns to Hammer as The General and once more finds himself fighting to forces of darkness. It has that quaint yet Hammer horror style. Titillating but reserved and always focused more on the story than being than trying to overtly steamy or sadistic. I think this was the first obvious mainstream lesbian vampire film. And like other films of the period, lesbianism is treated as a sick perversion. Vampirism was often used as a metaphor for hiding a deviant behavior. This is a great sister film for HAMMER's DRACULA films even if it's based on other subject matter. I am a huge fan of HAMMER and even favor their DRACULA and FRANKENSTEIN series over the more popular UNIVERSAL MONSTERS. I just wish they had made better werewolf films.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The lesbian vampire movie as moonlit poetry
Forester-226 September 1999
An ocean of mist hangs above a grave. A figure enveloped in a white shroud swirls through that mist with balletic grace, then rakes a hand across a bloody mouth.* A man at his niece's deathbed calls for her missing friend. The call echoes through the empty chambers of the house and down the terrace outside, where the wind blows fallen leaves through the autumn night. The calls merge with older echoes in a cemetery beneath a ruined castle. A woman walks in those mists, clad in her nightgown. The mists dissolve her from sight. * "I want you - to love me - for all your life," pleads a beautiful vampire turning from the view through a moonlit window to clasp the girl she loves with desperate intimacy. * That same vampire woman stands on a terrace in the sunset, tears glinting in her eyes while she listens to the ancestral echoes that condemn her to her fate. *

Yes, this is pure Hammer Horror: a work conceived as sheerest exploitation which somehow transforms itself - in its greatest moments anyway - to an authentic romantic poetry. Yes, of course, a lesbian vampire movie made by men may seem the height of sexism, and at a conceptual level the movie may be open to those charges. But a female gothic artist was involved here: Ingrid Pitt, whose Carmilla is such a vivid presence as to render herself the character we root for and her patriachal enemies as the true pale-faced monsters (Has Peter Cushing ever come across as less loveable?). Other screen vampiresses are bimbos or boogeywomen or upmarket fashion plates by comparison: Pitt is tigerish, witty, tender, passionate, vulnerable, savage and tragic: Perhaps the only actor, male or female, who has brought to full life all the complexities of the vampire psyche. She's great and the other film-makers, at their best, rise to the challenge she sets. The movie is hardly unflawed but when its accidental poetry gels, few movies in its genre can surpass it.
32 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Karnstein!
BandSAboutMovies6 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
If the past Hammer films seem bloody but chaste to you, by 1970 these films made the leap to the Karnestein Trilogy, replete nudity, sex and lesbianism. Offshoots - outright rip-offs is too mean - of the story of Carmilla, blame American-International Pictures, who wanted more explicit content to take advantage of the relaxed morals of the time.

We start in Styria, where a gorgeous blonde in just a nightgown (Kristen Lindholm, who is in all three of the trilogy) shows up in a graveyard where she's decapitated by Baron Hartog (Douglas Wilmer, Nayland Smith in the British Fu Manchu movies), a vampire destroying man out to kill every bloodsucker for what they did to his sister.

Years later, Marcilla (Ingrid Pitt!) comes to stay in the home of distant relative General Spielsdor (Peter Cushing). She soon causes nightmares for his niece Laura (Pippa Steel, who sadly died from cancer way too young at 44) and a gradual illness that claims her life.

Now known as Carmilla, Pitt continues seducing women like Madeline Smith from Theatre of Blood and sucking blood directly from their hearts. She's helped by Governess Mademoiselle Perrodot (Kate O'Mara, who played Joan Collins' sister on Dynasty, which is casting I approve of) and kills everyone who suspects them as an unexplained man in black watches.

Finally, the General and Baron trap her in her castle and lop off her head, because all this murder - and probably the fact that she was stealing so many wives - is too much for them to take. That's when they learn that her true name is Countess Mircalla Karnstein and the portrait on the wall is no longer a gorgeous woman, but a fanged skull.

Look for vampire actor Ferdy Mayne as a doctor. He played Count von Krolock in The Fearless Vampire Killers, Dracula in Freddie Francis' The Vampire Happening and, of course, God in Night Train to Terror.

This film - that dares you to taste the deadly passion of the blood-nymphs - was directed by Roy Ward Baker, who Scars of Dracula, Dr. Jekyll & Sister Hyde, Asylum, The Vault of Horror and The Monster Club.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Has its moments, and you can see why it was important
lemon_magic7 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Vampire Lovers" obviously broke some new territory in terms of eroticism and lesbian story elements, and I would say that it was very well acted (especially by Pittman), quite steamy in spots...and that the director and screenwriter deserved a lot of credit for trying something new.

But, and this is a big but, after the gruesome and compelling opening scene, the movie slowed to a crawl.The screenplay just sat there, for long, long minutes, building atmosphere but not having anything overly interesting actually happen.

And then there was a flurry of activity, and then...the same situation and setup repeated, almost note for note, for ANOTHER 20 minutes. Only this time Peter Cushing was out of the story. Even going through the motions in a character he's played many times, Cushing managed to light up a scene whenever he was on camera. With him gone the remaining cast, although filled with hardworking journeyman actors, simply couldn't keep things focused.

Well, there was the whole lesbian vampire/"viper in the bosom" thing unfolding, but I'm way past the point in my life where boobs get me excited.

And then in the last 15 minutes, every thing happened at once; Cushing and the rest of the "men heroes" charged to the rescue, and all was set right with the world. The payoff was...ALMOST...worth the wait.

It sounds as if I thought the movie sucked. I don't. There are lots of things right with the movie. Pittman's character seemed to be capable of some complex, bittersweet emotions and wasn't just a simple predator, and I liked that. A vampire movie that didn't overuse the Dracula character was a nice change of pace - it's as if this was actually a Dracula "side story" that fleshed out part of the Hammer canon, and I liked that, too.

But for me, the movie dragged in too many spots for too long to really be considered one the first rank of Hammer films. Just my opinion, for what it's worth.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Warm Embrace for The Vampire Lovers
mikhail08014 July 2010
I've finally caught up with this erotic supernatural thriller, which is bundled with "Countess Dracula" on an Ingrid Pitt Double Feature DVD. Having heard about this film since I was a boy reading "Castle of Frankenstein" magazine, I was well aware that more adult themes are included in this film than in the average Hammer vampire movie. And it still does have the power to shock today's audiences. I still wonder whether the "lovers" of the title are vampires or the mortals who love them? The question remains unanswered in my mind.

It's not news that "The Vampire Lovers" was based on Sheridan Le Fanu's novella, Carmella, and expounded on his original undercurrents of lesbianism and the eroticism often connected to vampire folklore. So here we have ancient vampire Ingrid Pitt traversing the countryside with her mother/aunt Dawn Addams, who looks near her contemporary in age. Apparently plenty of English Aristocracy easily throw open their doors for the likes of lovely, if somewhat distant, mystery ladies who make themselves right at home. Then beautiful vampire Pitt ingratiates herself with any virginal young lady in the household in order to slowly drain the blood from her body by biting her on the breast.

This is all pretty standard Hammer fare, but now served with a steaming hot portion of female skin and eroticism. Lovely and iconic cult figure Ingrid Pitt dominates the film, and she's fascinating to watch. All the women concerned are lovely to look at, and the proceedings move along at a nice pace, aided by colorful and atmospheric sets and locales.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This guest will drain...
lost-in-limbo9 July 2009
Hammer studio's 'The Vampire Lovers' is an durably crafted, highly unusual and sensually lusting period Gothic vampire tale in the tradition of Sheridan Le Fanu's 'Camellia'. Can you go wrong with the likes of horror icon Peter Cushing, striking buxom ladies in Ingrid Pitt (who really has an hypnotic pull when she puts the moves on the ladies), Pippa Steel, Kate O'Mara and Madeleine Smith tagging along for the enticingly nightmarish ride of flowing blood, screams from the bottom of the lungs, creeping bare skin and the undead of the night. Director Roy Ward Baker's (a Hammer veteran) tidily pastel display steadily moves along (which it could probably have used a little more spruce in the tactically taut story), as it breathes atmosphere with its sweeping orchestral score, focal photography and lushly detailed locations. The production looks top-notch, being earnestly staged with moments of visual suspense. Nothing beats its opening scenes, but after that it seems to concentrate on the dependable erotic tone of the story. A very commendable Hammer outing.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Has its moments...but not enough
preppy-310 February 2006
A (very) loose adaptation of the novella "Camilla". Starts right off with a bang when a female vampire being beheaded but that's about it for graphic violence. It's basically about a beautiful lesbian vampire (Ingrid Pitt) who is going after every young attractive woman around. That's about it for the plot.

I have (vague) recollections about seeing this at a drive-in when I was 8! I do remember Pitt attacking some men and a pretty mild (for now) lesbian sequence which had quite a reaction from my parents--my mother was disgusted, my father was enjoying it and I couldn't figure out WHAT was going on! I figured they were just good friends. I remember liking it...but I was very young.

Seeing it now it does have its moments. There are some very erotic, beautifully filmed sequences. There's next to no violence but there's plenty of female nudity. As a gay man I found this pretty dull. It contains the same overly familiar Hammer sets found in all their other films and has a pretty vague plot (who IS that guy in black on the horse?). Also a beheading at the end is SO obviously fake. On the positive side Peter Cushing is on hand to give another good performance and Pitt is very beautiful and is a pretty good actress--some of her expressions are priceless! And Jon Finch is handsome and hunky as the main hero.

But, all in all, I was bored. The lesbian bits are tame by todays standards (I heard they were considered pretty extreme for 1970) and--unless you're interested in lesbian vampires or pointless female nudity--this is pretty dull stuff. I give it a 3 for some of the acting and good direction--but I can't recommend this.
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Hammer Classic
BaronBl00d7 August 2000
This film gets a lot of ribbing for the casual nudity that bedecks it. Not fair. This film is in many ways another Hammer classic with its good solid acting, its lush photography and costuming, and general sense of horror. It is based in part on Sheridan Le Fanu's classic female vampire story Carmilla about a young girl that befriends other young girls only to vampirize them. Ingrid Pitt plays the toothy(and toothsome) vampire wench in all her busty splendour. She is magnificent on the screen and oozes sex appeal. Yes, she goes topless as do her female co-stars....but although one sees that these scenes feel forced...they do not detract from the film(and for me they enhanced it greatly). The rest of the cast is good with Peter Cushing as a general in a small role and Harvey Hall as a servant standing out. The best part of the film for me is the eerie graveyard of the Castle Karnstein that we are introduced to in the prologue and again visited to in the epilogue. It really sets the mood of the story and was a pretty inspired rendition of the Carmilla tale.
34 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Notable Hammer film with solid acting , great horror moments and well-mounted scenes
ma-cortes4 January 2021
Eerie and spooky film based on Sheridan Le Fanu's Camilla and following a sequel titled Lust for a Vampire . This enjoyable flick was soon used in countless imitations , rip-offs and other vampire vehicles . And deemed to be Hammer Studio's first terror film with nudism, another addition to the horror genre which spread rapidly , including its follow-up . It starts with an attactive pre-credits sequences holding dreamy beauty . Dealing with an anger father : Peter Cushing , who goes after a lesbian vampire : Ingrid Pitt who has ravished his daughter and other young girls in a peaceful European village . She's the New Horror from Hammer¡ . A hot nightmare of unsettling lust that throb in headless , undead bodies ! . Beautiful...or Bloodthirst monster ¡ .A Bloodstained Tale of Terror and Torture ¡ . Even the Lifeless Can love , Even the Dead Can Desire . A Tale of Unholy Blood Lust . If you dare..... taste the deadly passion of the Blood Nymphs . Carmilla is really queen of lesbian vampires ¡ .

This creepy film contains thrills , chills , nudism and horrifying scenes. The movie which became Ingrid Pitt a major terror film cult figure, playing splendidly a voracious lesbian vampire . This is an erotic nightmare of tormented lust neither apt for squeamish , nor for virginal people , but for free spirits . This important yarn marks the point at which vampirism in British film turned so overtly erotic that the pictures virtually ceased to be about anything except sex and naked women . After that , examples of the strain were to become terribly repetitive , monotonous and slutty . Along with horror main stars : Peter Cushing and Ingrld Pitt appears an acceptable support cast with plenty of beautiful girls as Pippa Steele , Madeleine Smith, Kate O'Mara , Dawn Addams and other notorious actors as John Finch , George Cole , Ferdy Mayne and Douglas Wilmer .

The motion picture was well and compellingly directed by Roy Ward Baker . He was a British artisan who made several terror films such as : The Monster Club, Masks of Death, And now the Screaming Starts , The Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires , Vault of Horror , Asylum, Dr Jekill and Sister Hyde , The Scars of Dracula , The Anniversary , among others. The flick will appeal to Peter Cushing and Ingrid Pitt fans .
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Classic Hammer
gavin69427 October 2014
Seductive vampire Carmilla Karnstein (Ingrid Pitt) and her family target the beautiful and the rich a remote area of late 18th century Germany.

At only a £165,227 budget, how could they afford to do anything other than hire Peter Cushing and Ingrid Pitt? The answer, of course, is that these horror icons were not earning the huge salaries their counterparts today are.

But Pitt and Cushing are not even the biggest deal here. Although not as well known as Cushing or Pitt, Madeline Smith was a Hammer regular and is half of the "vampire lovers" from the title. She had previously appeared in "Taste the Blood of Dracula" (1969) and go on to do "Theatre of Blood" (1972) and "Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell" (1972) before going even more mainstream as a Bond girl.

Further, director Roy Ward Baker is perhaps best known for his work with Hammer and Hammer horror, but actually had a long, distinguished career in Hollywood, including directing the Golden Globe-winning "A Night to Remember" (1958) and a young Marilyn Monroe in "Don't Bother to Knock" (1952).

This is seen as a "female-driven film" when seen from a feminist perspective, and more generally thought of as a lesbian vampire film. Pitt says this is not a lesbian film and stresses that "vampires are not lesbians", they are just very physical and passionate. Baker says the producers probably wanted to suggest lesbian themes, but that was never his intention -- he wanted a good film, not a sensational one. He further says the lesbian theme is not in the original story, regardless of what others claim.

The audio commentary on the MGM disc features director Roy Ward Baker and actress Ingrid Pitt, which is well worth a listen.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Too Bad Of A Vampire Story
Rainey-Dawn20 December 2014
First movie of the Karnstein Trilogy. The film is not that bad - it does hit a lull for awhile then picks back up.

The first part of the film Marcilla ends up invited to stay with General von Spielsdorf and his daughter Laura. Laura is lured by the vampress Marcilla. Marcilla drains Laura of blood, Laura dies due to blood loss.

The second part Marcilla changes her name to Carmilla. And ends up being invited to stay with Roger Morton and his daughter Emma. Emma is lured by Carmilla and is beginning to be drained of blood by Carmilla. This is the lull in the movie because it almost is a repeat of the first part of the film.

The third part the movie picks back up when the men put their heads together to hunt down the vampire Mircalla Karnstein and end her murderous terror.

Marcilla / Carmilla / Mircalla Karnstein is in fact the same woman/vampire played well by the beautiful Ingrid Pitt. Mircalla is a bi-sexual vampress as she lures not only women but men as well.

I LOVE the atmosphere, sets, costuming and the music of this film!! This is appeal of the film - the look and feel of it.

It is the lull that the movie hits that bored me... just a bit to much of the same in the second part as the first part. (I am calling it parts or acts but maybe wrong about that.) Yes there is romance or humm more like lust in the film: and the title fits the film.

7/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The cheap thrills are the only reason to watch this one.
pmtelefon27 October 2019
If it wasn't for the large amount of cleavage and nudity, "Vampire Lovers" would be a pretty bad movie. Because there is so much skin in this movie, it remains on my Hammer rotation. By Hammer standards, however, "Vampire Lovers" is sub-par. Hammer films are usually well produced, good looking movies. The sets and backgrounds of this movie look cheap. The male members of the cast aren't up to snuff either. Even the always great Peter Cushing seems off his game in this movie. Despite all of the flesh, "Vampire Lovers" starts to wear out its welcome after a while.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
New Hammer, new era of sex and violence
Leofwine_draca26 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Excellent production values highlight this slow-moving Gothic horror yarn from Hammer in which all of the action is confined to the beginning and end of the movie. The middle part consists of lots of atmosphere building sequences which can feel laboured and do drag a little life from the film. It's the slow-paced nature of the tale which stops it from being a total Hammer classic, although it's still very good. It reminds me of Hammer's Dracula, which is also a slow moving tale as both films dwell on victims gradually falling weaker as they're preyed on by the vampire menace.

On the plus side, the film contains lots of the same ethereal atmosphere (with scenes of nightdress-clad beauties wandering through mist-enshrouded countryside at night) as the films of French auteur Jean Rollin, and is very suspenseful and thrilling when it needs to be. It's just a shame that so much time is taken up with non-action as most of the leading men leave the film for the middle duration and the resulting women seduce and are victimised by each other. What we're left with are numerous scenes of Ingrid Pitt and Madeline Smith being naked which do get a little repetitive despite the premise.

The film benefits from an extremely strong cast of British character actors. George Cole (taking a break from his usual comedy genre) stars as Roger Morton, whose beautiful daughter Emma (played by Madeline Smith, a regular young British beauty from the period) is seduced and preyed upon by the voluptuous Carmilla. Ingrid Pitt takes the lead in her first Hammer Horror appearance and makes for an unforgettably sexy vampiress, although she's romantic rather than scary. Kate O'Mara has a supporting role as a French governess although her role is limited and extraneous.

Genre fans will be pleased to hear that Peter Cushing also has a small role in the film, and it is he who gets to confront Ingrid Pitt in explicitly gory scenes at the end of the film which make up for the non-action preceding those scenes. Despite playing a much different character, you can't help but see a flash of Van Helsing as Cushing does his duty. Cushing's authoritative performance is a highlight of the film. Supporting actors include Ferdy Mayne as the unfortunate family doctor, Douglas Wilmer as Baron von Hartog, an expert vampire killer who beheads his own sister in a gruesome opening scene, Dawn Addams as the briefly-seen Countess (her character unexplained and mysterious) and a very young-looking Jon Finch as the handsome young male lead. The familiar faces of Pippa Steele (who, despite dying, returns in the sequel) and John Forbes-Robertson (as the sinister "Man in Black" he is no less laughable here than his camped-up turn as Dracula in LEGEND OF THE 7 GOLDEN VAMPIRES) appear in minor roles, while Harvey Hall puts in an excellent turn as the loyal manservant Renton.

The film's strength is in playing it all totally seriously, even the so-called "erotic sequences", with none of the tacky cheesiness which overwhelmed the sequel, LUST FOR A VAMPIRE. The film concentrates on the sex rather than the horror aspects with plenty of lesbian tension and Pitt wandering around in a low-cut dress for the entire course of the film. The violence, on the other hand, is limited to a couple of decapitations and some splashes of blood - admittedly colourful. The music is lyrical yet understated, the costumes immaculate and the ladies quite simply gorgeous. THE VAMPIRE LOVERS is a watchable Hammer film which is a must-see for fans, yet by not including any of the trademark excitement or style that another director would have brought to the movie it just misses 'total classic' status. I'm surprised to admit it, but Roy Ward Baker's journeyman direction is merely perfunctory.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Vampire Lovers
henry8-315 April 2023
Lesbian vampire Carmilla (Ingrid Pitt) ingratiates herself into various noble houses with a view to seducing various young daughters and turning them into vampires, with fathers Peter Cushing and George Cole doing their best to save their children and destroy Carmilla.

Whilst the desire to eroticise the vampire story is fine, the need to expose endless bosoms at every opportunity does rather invoke schoolboy giggles these days. That aside, this is definitely an above average hammer horror with a good story, some impressive and rather spooky imagery, a solid lead in Ingrid Pitt and of course wonderful Peter Cushing. In the minus column, I could have done without John Forbes-Robertson as a sort of wannabe Dracula figure appearing for no real reason periodically on his horse snarling and wearing too much make up. Solid Hammer horror.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Carmilla Karnstein
AaronCapenBanner24 November 2013
Roy Ward Baker directed this film that stars Ingrid Pitt as beautiful(but evil) Carmilla Karnstein, a female vampire who ingratiates herself into the household of General Von Spielsdorf(played by Peter Cushing) whose daughter Laura becomes a target of Carmilla. After finishing with her, Carmilla moves on, but a distraught and enraged General Spielsdorf vows revenge against her, and enlists others to learn her secret history, then track her down to destroy her and end that evil. Good cast of course, but this Hammer studios film is mostly lurid exploitation, though there is a memorable nude bathing scene for Miss Pitt, the film's highlight.(Not much of a coherent plot however...)
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My favorite Carmilla film
minamurray13 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
... and great example how fun their much-criticized 1970's output really is. Untypically classy for 1970's sexy-lesbian-vampiress-story, probably because it is made with Hammer's old-fashioned British restraint, this little film actually works brilliantly. It has lovely 19th century sets and scenery, completed with wonderful misty graveyards and Gothic castles, beautiful color photography and lot of lush, romantic atmosphere. Like Hammer's Hands of the ripper, this film has a pretty, somewhat tragic female monster in 19th century home - storyline I feel is very fascinating. Sheridan LeFanu's plot is followed pretty faithfully, but for example film's young and beautiful governess, hopelessly smitten with Carmilla who prefers heroine Emma, was fat middle-aged lady in the original story, without any sexual/romantic interest to vampire lady.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Queen of the Blood Nymphs
richardchatten18 March 2022
For one of the undead Ingrid Pitt is very much flesh and blood as she glides in colour-coded Regency frocks and big hair through this baroque seventies update of Sheridan Le Fanu's 'Carmella ' stylishly directed by Roy Baker complete with Freudian dream sequences and fanciful colour effects.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Peter Cushing and vampire lesbians, what an odd combination.
Boba_Fett11385 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"The Vampire Lovers" is an original Hammer movie because it has a very much present lesbian undertone and storyline. But is the movie itself much good? Not always. It's a pretty uneven movie with some nice elements in it but overall it leaves too many loose ends and its story drags too much at some points, which all doesn't make this movie the most pleasant of the Hammer movies to watch.

The movie is fairly slow and never really finds the right pace. Even though the movie is just 91 minutes short, it feels much longer. There simply happens to little exciting or interesting enough in the story.

But main problem I had with this movie was that it lacked a real main character. There isn't really a 'hero' present in the movie and the movie keeps switching between different characters, which makes it uneasy for us the viewer to really feel for any of the characters. It also doesn't make the movie exactly a terribly exciting one to watch.

It was pretty nice to see Peter Cushing going Van Helsing-style again toward the ending of the movie but still his presence in the movie makes a pointless impression. Also a totally pointless impression made John Forbes-Robertson as the 'Man in Black'. The presence of his character and his purpose is never explained in the movie. I suppose that his character was supposed to be Count Dracula? We shall perhaps never know...

The movie does have some nice elements in it and some good movie-tricks and little story-twists at times, so the movie is not a complete bore or disaster to watch. The way of storytelling might perhaps be not the best but still the story is one of the things which makes this movie good and original enough to still watch it.

5/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed