Bloodthirsty Butchers (1970) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
More Milligan crap.
BA_Harrison3 November 2017
Bloodthirsty Butchers is z-grade horror director Andy Milligan's version of Sweeney Todd, The Demon Barber of Fleet Street. Working on an extremely small budget, Milligan unwisely attempts to recreate the look and feel of Victorian England and, rather unsurprisingly, fails on almost every level, with particularly unconvincing production design, the film boasting patently fake shop facades and completely unauthentic costumery (did Milligan actually research the era or did he just go with what he imagined it was like?).

The film stars Annabella Wood as Johanna Jeffrey, assistant in the bakery run by Maggie Lovett (Jane Hilary), who gets the delicious filling for her meat pies from barber Sweeney Todd, who kills customers with his cut-throat razor. Johanna is planning to quit her job to marry her fiancé Jarvis (Michael Cox), but is unaware of the murder and mayhem that surrounds her, at least until Jarvis falls victim to the evil Mr. Todd.

Weighed down by interminable scenes of dreadful dialogue, and suffering from hopelessly amateurish direction, the film is yet another test of one's resolve from the always awful Milligan, making it through to the end being a challenge for even the most hardened of horror fans. Along the way, we are treated to just a smattering of nudity (from Susan Cassidy, as songstress Anna, who is having an affair with Sweeney), some terrible gore (rubber appendages are hacked off and there's an unconvincing meat cleaver in the head effect), and the unforgettable sight of a severed breast in a pie, all of which just about saves the film from earning the absolute minimum rating possible.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The cheapest Sweeney Todd you'll ever see...
Leofwine_draca29 October 2016
BLOODTHIRSTY BUTCHERS is another vapid mess of a film by cult director Andy Milligan, a guy whose films take amateur to a new, low level. This one's as cheap and inept as the rest of his oeuvre and the only interesting thing about it is that it was shot in London for an extra level of authenticity.

Sadly as a film this is a complete mess not to mention a travesty of film-making. It's a near-plot less effort in which various characters converse and romance each other for almost the entire running time. Occasionally some gore scenes are spliced into the mix and these consist of blood with the same consistency as ketchup and some rubber body parts being amputated. There is a plot twist of sorts at the climax but that's the only real incident here.

The entire cast is amateurish and seems to have been picked from a local amateur theatrics group. Certainly they're wooden and awkward in front of the camera although the dialogue they're being asked to deliver is about as mind-numbing as you'd expect. Milligan has cast a couple of attractive young starlets but his level of interest goes no further; they may look the part but as soon as they open their mouths the realism disappears. BLOODTHIRSTY BUTCHERS is another dog of a film from this director and only die-hard bad movie lovers are likely to enjoy it.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
bloodthirsty what?
trashgang11 December 2008
This is awful, you just could't believe it. The score is annoying, the filming is bad, for example, sometimes you see the shadow of the cameraman appearing on some actors faces. The quality of the movie is ultra bad, seems like it was made in the 20ies. It's terrible. There is a bit of blood in the beginning and through the movie but always too dark filmed. No gore no effects. The director made some better one like Blood Rites. But out there there is a following of the man, 'cause searching to find this cheap flick isn't that hard but you have to pay hard earned cash for it. Surely this will get in my top ten of worst horrormovies ever, I don't know if I would call it horror. There is too much talking, you will get bloodthirsty after watching it
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A big steaming pile of garbage!
jbeaucha-127 June 2006
What a terrible movie this was! I made it about 50 minutes into it and started skipping chapters until the end. The plot is nothing special, and the dialog from the movie deviates from the main story so much that your head will explode out of rage. Many useless minutes wasted just listening to characters jabber on about something irrelevant to the plot, AND/OR something that could said in a shorter amount of time. The camera work is shaky, and grainy. It seemed Mr. Milligan needed to take his finger off of the zoom button! I noticed also that at some points during this movie it seemed that Andy was having seizures, and would uncontrollably shake the camera. The splices between scenes were jumpy and didn't flow. The murder scenes were nothing special - incredibly, and laughably fake. Barely any gore, as the title suggests. This movie runs about 1 hour 20 minutes and the murder scenes take up about 1 minute TOTAL of the whole movie - if that. What a wretched piece of garbage this movie was. Andy Milligan is in fact probably one of the worst directors to plague mankind with his talentless directing, and camera-work. Usually, I can make it through really bad horror movies, and laugh about it later. BLOODTHIRSTY BUTCHERS, however, I can't. I am just angry I wasted an hour and a half of my life watching this (what I wouldn't do to gain it back). Take my suggestion, and DO NOT see this movie unless you plan on falling asleep. TERRIBLE.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
"Sweney Todd" by way of Andy Milligan
lovecraft23112 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
You know the story of "Sweeney Todd" now, most likely thanks to Tim Burton's recent movie. You probably don't know it though, from this take on the old tale from Andy Milligan-that notorious sleaze merchant that gave Al Adamson and Ted V. Mikels a run for their money.

It had to happen eventually. In my years of watching horror and exploitation from the 60's to the 80's, I'm finally reviewing an Andy Milligan movie. You see, from 1964 to 1990, Andy gave us many an exploitation and horror movie-none of which was any good, and barely watchable. "The Bloodthirsty Butchers" is no exception.

There is dialog and well, there is talk, and that's one of the things you will find here-lots and lots of talk. The movie reaches almost "Manos The Hands of Fate" levels at times, as you wait tirelessly for something to happen. While I love cheap looking gore effects, the violence is too few and far between, and in spite of it's reputation, the "breast" scene isn't that shocking.

I love cheap and sleazy exploitation as much as the next trash cinema devotee, but "Bloodthirsty Butchers" is the kind of bad that MST3K would tear apart mercilessly. Sadly, Milligan would die of AIDS in 1991, and if there is any movie of his I'd say I sort of like, it would be the delirious "The Ghastly Ones." This is no "Ghastly Ones" though-it's just bad.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A lesser known version of Sweeney Todd
jcaraway321 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
When I bought this film, I expected to get a fun, 1970's exploitation film. Instead, I got this bore fest by amateur auteur Andy Milligan. Ah, Andy Milligan. With his tight editing, breakneck pacing , and wonderfully well known actors, you'd almost think you're watching...one of his home movies! Seriously, I couldn't even stay awake the first time I tried to watch it. The scenes of boring people dragged on an on, and whenever someone got killed, the film would slow down. Sometimes it would speed up too, making the characters voices sound like chipmunks, which was probably the best thing about this film. The script actually seemed a bit better than the film, and seems more well suited to be in a soap opera than in a grainy 70's sleeping pill where the actors constantly stumble over it's lines. The cover said "Their prime cuts were curiously erotic...but thoroughly brutal!" Trust me, there is nothing "erotic" about this film. Oh, we do get to see characters that resemble extra lumpy cottage cheese making out, but that's about it. And as far as "brutal", well, the viewer is brutalized the most with this here film. And another thing...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not even worth reading about
Tromafreak15 February 2010
The word "boring" gets thrown around way too often when referring to exactly how bad a low-budget Horror movie might, or might not be. I've seen many a B-movie. Many horrible, terribly inept B-movies. Some with a production value of a few hundred bucks. Does ineptness, lousy acting, worse continuity, and embarrassing budgets really make a movie unwatchable? Some would no doubt way yes. Most of which are probably huge fans of The Matrix. Well, I hate big-budget movies, so I say no. Bad can sometimes be funny (Blood Freak), sometimes even mind-blowing (Troll 2), but Boring will always be unwatchable... Hey, kinda like Bloodthirsty Butchers, which reminds me, I'm writing a review for this pile of garbage... Uh, yeah, anyway. This is one of late British director Andy Milligan's many alternatives to sleeping pills. This one is based on Sweeney Todd... Great. Milligan takes a boring story, and still manages to "butcher" it. Hey, that's pretty funny, I said bu... sorry, I keep getting distracted. This isn't exactly easy. On second thought, I'll make it easy. No gore, no scares, no entertainment, just unlikeable, annoying people having incoherent conversations. that's Bloodthirsty Butchers. Oh yeah, and something about a barber killing people, and something or other about meat pies. I don't know, it's not important.

For something a little more rewarding from Andy Milligan, there's always the only other one I've seen, The Rats Are Coming, The Werewolves Are Here. Yeah, you heard me. But hows about we forget about this Milligan guy all together, and pick up something sweet like Sick Girl or Teenape Goes To Camp. Whatever you decide, just know, Bloodthirsty Butchers sucks, possibly even more than any other version of this already lackluster tale. And that, B-movie fans, is really saying something. 2/10
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Milligan attempts to do the story of Sweeney Todd with a budget of $50
udar5522 January 2012
Ooof! The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (John Miranda) lets you know his business right away as he cuts a man's throat in the first three minutes (he pulls a towel over the victim's face and the guy reacts as if he is being pulled back, despite his attacker letting go at one point). Sweeney pockets the valuables and the rest goes into the meat pies of Mrs. Lovett (Jane Hilary). Things get complicated when good girl shop worker Johanna (Annabella Wood) wonders where her boyfriend disappeared to. Good God! Only Andy Milligan could drag down the exploitation material found in the Todd story. You know what the other adaptations of that Penny Dreadful were missing? How about looooong scenes of people talking and talking and talking. To be fair, there is about a minute of pretty good stuff in here, mostly coming from some meat cleaver attacks. Milligan recreates the 19th century about as well as I can waltz and I'm pretty sure one scene has a shot of a modern era heater in the back and light switches. Miranda's Sweeney looks like a cross between Abraham Lincoln and Bowzer from Sha Na Na, but he is, surprisingly, a decent actor. The rest of the cast is there, local theater English accents and all. Look for "fortnight" to be said twice within the first ten minutes.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Amazingly inept Sweeney Todd tale.
poolandrews24 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Bloodthirsty Butchers is set in London, England during the Victorian era where Sweeney Todd (John Miranda) owns a barbers shop where he regularly murders his clients to steal money & jewellery from them, he disposes of the bodies with a woman named Maggie Lovett (Jane Helay) who own a pie shop & uses the human meat to fill her product. However as Todd & Lovett become more desperate for money they take more chances & soon people start to suspect that something may be wrong with Mrs. Lovett's pie's...

Photographed, co-written & directed by Andy Milligan who is surely one of the worst filmmakers of all time (I still think Jesus Franco is the absolute worst) with the wonderfully sensationalistic titled Bloodthirsty Butchers perhaps his best known film although it's still really hard to sit through as it's an inept mess from start to finish. The film revolves around the legend of Sweeney Todd the killer barber who murdered his clients & then made pie's out of the bodies that Mrs. Lovett sold in her pie shop, at only 77 minutes long Bloodthirsty Butchers still drags & is just too random. The script is terrible, we never learn anything about anyone, people's motivations are slim to say the least & it's just boring. The character's & dialogue are both poor, the little sub-plots about Tobias & that woman with his baby, Todd seeing that woman & getting into arguments with Fisk, the customer who comes into the shop & ask's for a special pie & Mrs. Lovett's crippled husband who actually serves no purpose whatsoever.

It's amazing just how inept Bloodthirsty Butchers is, the editing is maybe the worst I have ever seen & what happens at the end is anyone's guess as it's just a mass of random scenes, people shouting & photography so dark it's impossible to see what's going on. The music is out of place & just randomly plays in the background, the photography is awful & the camera shakes around all over the place while the few gore effects here look pretty bad. Rumour has it Bloodthirsty Butchers was cut by the distributors before it was released, despite having a hand & finger chopped off early on all of the murder scenes look edited & are sometimes impossible to follow & hard to tell what actually happened. Made as a period piece Bloodthirsty Butchers look terrible with costumes & decors seemingly spanning decades & entire continents, it just looks odd & never feels like any one era or time period. Originally shot on 16mm film this was blown up to 35mm & as such it looks awful with dull colours, loads of grain & a soft picture.

The IMDb says Bloodthirsty Butchers had a budget of about $18,000 but Milligan did go on record as saying none of his films cost more than $10,000 even though this looks like it was shot for less than $2,000. The acting is awful, the scene where Tobias is 'secretly' following Jarvis about two feet behind him is embarrassingly bad.

Bloodthirsty Butchers is a terrible film, it's technical incompetence is staggering & it's an eyesore to watch, the ending is just baffling. Very stagy with lots of dull dialogue scenes full of tedious drama. You won't know whether to laugh or cry.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Uninspired Sweeney Todd Tale
jamiemiller-076117 December 2021
Inspired by the classic urban legend of Sweeney Todd, a murderous barber who kills his customers and has them baked into pies by his business partner, Bloodthirsty Butchers keeps the basic foundation and makes up the rest with less than ideal results.

Of course, it looks even cheaper than an elementary school play, but that could be forgiven if the script was tight and the acting was better. Unfortunately, it's not and the most you have to look forward to are a few gory murder scenes that don't much convince.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
70s Gore Classic Drive in fare
wizardtruestar1 February 2019
So bad, it is now known as a classic cult gore fest. I watched this at the drive in when it was just released, along with other gore films that were popular at the time. I remember the title as "Night of the Bloody Butchers". I was 17 then.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sweeney Todd and butchery.
HumanoidOfFlesh26 June 2002
"Bloodthirsty Butchers" is possibly Andy Milligan's most famous horror film.This is somewhat clever take on the Sweeney Todd story woven around themes of dominance and submission.Populated with a collection of selfish characters and a very small number of decent human beings bloody murders are taking place on Fleet Street and nobody seems to notice caught up as they are in their own little worlds--until they wind up murdered themselves.Unfortunately I found this film a bit disappointing-I enjoyed "The Ghastly Ones"(1968)more.There are some good scenes of splashy gore and butchery,but the rest of the film is too talky and dull.In my humble opinion Andy Milligan was an underrated filmmaker-I'll definitely check out more of his stuff if I have a chance.4 out of 10-a breast in a pie scene is priceless!
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Phew!
BaronBl00d16 January 2005
Andy Milligan, the independent movie maker from New York, directs this little "treat" as his version of the Sweeney Todd legend. Sweeney slits the throats of customers in his barbershop and his cohort Mrs. Lovett turns them into meat pies. Thankfuly I was well-informed of the plot prior to seeing this film travesty. Milligan, for my money, has to indeed be running in the lead of worst directors of all-time race. Ed Wood looks like Orson Welles in comparison. This movie is so bad in oh so many ways. Let's take Milligan's direction for starters. The film quality is grainy. The sound quality is grainy. Many scenes look as if Milligan was using a camcorder to film. The credits say "Photograped and directed by Andy Milligan." He wants to take credit for ceilings showing up after a death scene? How about the atrocious musical score selected for the film? The film cuts with one poor transition after another. Little logic is used in the creation of the plot. The story has little to do with the actual legend of Todd. The murder scenes are plentiful but not horrifying in any way. Hands, legs, and other appendages are cut with the skill in which the editing was done: choppily! And let's take the breast in the pie scene. Yes, it is in there. The pie maker didn't know that an entire breast with nipple filled an entire pie crust? Later we hear from our characters that they "have been careful not to get caught" for the 200 plus murders they have done. Obviously they are a couple of boobs not able to keep abreast of what is going on(sorry it was too tempting). The actors are not too terribly bad to be honest. Some even have glimmers of talent, and all seem to be genuine English articles. Many non-erotic nude scenes are forced throughout. Milligan seemingly has some issues regarding sex. Plot strands are left untied. The ending is almost unwatchable due to poor camera work. I could go on and on. Did I like anything about the film? Not much to be truthful. I have a high level of acceptance for films of this ilk in terms of low budgets and marginal talent, but this film lacks any real purpose other than to be crude and sick.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bloodthirsty Butchers was inspired by the Sweeney Todd musical?
Scribbler624 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Surprisingly to state Tim Burton's idea came from a musical created in written by Frederick Hazleton in 1865 called Sweeney Todd: The barber of Fleet Street or also called The String of Pearls, which Todd and lovely woman named Mrs. Lovett killed and cooked meat pies and sold it to unsuspected costumers, however; the musical had upgraded through out the years and it wasn't until a Broadway play called Sweeney Todd rewrote by Christopher Bond in 1973 did the barber have an actual reason why he butchered helpless costumers and made meat pies out of them, therefore; I am sure that Bloodthirsty Butchers were inspired by the original play just like Tim Burton with the 1973 version. I was inspired by this movie greatly, but anyways lets say both movies a gore filled and amusing I like them both equally.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another Awful Milligan Film
Michael_Elliott1 October 2018
Bloodthirsty Butchers (1970)

1/2 (out of 4)

Barber Sweeney Todd (John Miranda) and baker Maggie Lovett (Jane Hilary) realize that they can be a service to one another and team up in this maddening Andy Milligan film. Sweeney Todd murders the patrons who sit in his barber chair and he sends the meat over to Lovett for her pies.

I've seen the majority of the Milligan titles that are currently available and I must say that I'm amazed that he has such a following. Well, let me take that back. It's easy to see why such horrible films would have a following since many people love bad movies. What shocks me is the fact that there are many people out there who feel that Milligan was a great director and that something like BLOODTHIRSTY BUTCHERS was a great film.

It's pretty darn hard to mess up the Sweeney Todd story but Milligan manages to do that with this incredibly poorly acted film that doesn't do a thing in regards to entertainment. We start off with a man betting chopped up by the butcher and the special effects are so awful that you can't help but laugh. In fact, Milligan doesn't even try to hide how poorly the rubber hand and fingers are!

From here the film pretty much turns into a boring melodrama as we see Todd and Lovett talk, argue, fight, make up and do a wide range of other dialogue scenes that just really drag the film down. It doesn't help that the performances are on the bad side and it really doesn't help that the dialogue is some of the worst that you'll ever have to listen to. There's not much real gore or violence so that's another letdown.

What really shocks me about Milligan and films like this is that he apparently felt that someone wanted to watch them. His films are basically arthouse movies that try to pass themselves off as exploitation or horror movies. The problem is that those elements are never delivered an instead we are left with rather poor films.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Let's hope Tim Burton didn't look for inspiration here ...
Coventry24 January 2008
As I write this user-comment, Tim Burton's interpretation of the Sweeney Todd tale is making big money at the box office and the film even earned a couple of Oscar nominations if I'm not mistaken. I haven't seen it yet, but I sincerely hope Burton didn't look for inspiration and/or stylish trademarks in good old Andy Milligan's "Bloodthirsty Butchers". Yes, even though the title distinctively mentions butchers, the main characters in the plot are a barber (the infamous Sweeney Todd) and a female baker. Together they form a vile alliance where he kills the customers in his shop and she processes the bodies into her famous London meat pies. In other words, an Andy Milligan premise at his most typical, derivative, delirious and amateurish. I think the IMDb rating for this film speaks for itself. Although the actual story definitely isn't the worst I've ever seen, Milligan somehow inexplicably attracts sheer ineptitude. The production is one gigantic mess, with an incoherent narrative structure, truly hideous photography, poor lighting, lousy acting and directing, laughable gore and zilch tension or atmosphere. More than half of the footage is pure padding and words fail to describe how BORING the film is, even with a running time of a mere 80 minutes. Ed Wood, Ted V. Mikels and Bruno Mattei; you guys need not fear as none other than Andy Milligan is – hands down – the worst director ever, but I don't think he cared. Maybe if you dispose of a really high level of tolerance, "Bloodthirsty Butchers" is worth one viewing.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
piece of crap
HandsomeBen14 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This movie should be destroyed and never be seen again. It's THAT bad. The camera quality itself is really bad. I've seen better quality on cheap camcorders from Best Buy. If you don't have enough money to make a good movie, (at least indie type horror movie), then don't make it. If you don't have enough money to hire good actors then don't make it. If you don't have enough money to hire a better script writer then don't make it! It's really not worth it! It's not like you are going to make a lot of money from making a piece of crap like this.

The acting and the accents were annoying. The acting had little to no real emotion. All the women in this movie were terrible. When their character was suppose to mad they didn't look mad. For example this one woman demanded to get her money back because she found a clump of hair in her pie. Instead of looking mad she looked like she was talking about the weather. It was so stupid. Everyone in this movie should never be cast in another movie ever again.

For a movie with the title Bloodthirty Butchers it really wasn't that violent. There was a scene where a dead woman's body was lying on a table and the killer was cutting her into pieces. Every time he made a move to chop one of her limps the camera quickly cut away. The dumbest death scene EVER. I just didn't get the point. I'm glad I didn't waste anymore of my time watching the whole thing. Just a waste.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bloodthirsty Butchers
BandSAboutMovies18 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Released as a double feature with Torture Dungeon, Bloodthirsty Butchers finds Andy Milligan making another one of the classics. Sweeney Todd to be exact.

Sweeney Todd (John Miranda) and Maggie Lovett (Jane Hilary) come together to kill off their customers, steal their money and valuables, and give the bodies to Tobias Ragg (Berwick Kaler) to disposal. After a few kills, they start getting way into murder, so they decide to start using the bodies to make meat pies, including one that has a woman's entire breast in it.

Shot in London, this actually feels like it could be in its time period, unlike the New York City Milligan movies where you can see modern buildings and hear the traffic. Milligan made five movies in 1970 alone - Torture Dungeon, Nightbirds, Guru the Mad Monk and The Body Beneath are the other films - and it's pretty wild that he was doing so much so often. Then again, to the casual viewer, these movies are overly melodramatic films made by a lunatic who can't even use a tripod, but to those who love these movies, well, they're also overly melodramatic films made by a lunatic who can't even use a tripod. Perspective is important.

TV Guide said that Bloodthirsty Butchers was a "gory and typically cheap retelling of the Sweeney Todd legend." One star.

I may have ranked it much higher.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
My favorite character is "the slut."
TheMikeJustice13 February 2000
Warning: Spoilers
Excessively talky and cheap horror movie apparently shot in England somewhere. The main girl from TORTURE DUNGEON is in it, although I couldn't point her out. Lots of subplots and bad acting. I've seen a couple of the actors in better movies. I think the pie-making lady turned up later on a British sitcom called GOOD NEIGHBOURS. My favorite character is "the slut." The scene where a couple finds a boob in a pie is priceless.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Please, Please Love Me! Pleeeease!"...
azathothpwiggins7 June 2021
BLOODTHIRSTY BUTCHERS is Director Andy Milligan's dubious take on SWEENEY TODD. As such, it contains all of the Milligan mainstays: sub-trash, thrift store costumes, beyond rubbish dialogue, "actors" who appear dazed by their surroundings, not-so special effects, etc.

John Miranda plays the barbarous barber, and Jane Hillary is his ghoulish, piemaking accomplice, Maggie Lovett. In all fairness, the two principals don't do a bad job of wading through this swill. Alas, Milligan's signature lack of production values leaves them adrift, while the other characters leave no impression at all.

As with the vast majority of the Director's epics, the main problem lies in just how bloody boring it all is! One vacuous vignette after another shuffles across the screen, interrupted only occasionally by some rib-tickling violence.

Milligan movies are a true test of one's constitution. This one is no exception! Most viewers will wilt almost immediately, while even the initiated will fight to pay attention or to stay awake. This is incredibly difficult, even if your eyelids are stapled to your forehead, and you've placed a hot coal in each shoe!

EXTRA POINTS FOR: #1- The "love scene" that's almost as erotic as watching pumpkins bob against each other in a barrel! #2- For anyone who can discern the breed of dog that makes the humanoid whining sound that's found in this film!...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed