Last Summer (1969) Poster

(1969)

User Reviews

Review this title
63 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Youth, innocence and cruelty
poc-11 August 2002
This coming of age drama is about four friends living on an island who meet on the beach. As they discover sex and each other they are at times brave, kind and considerate. However at other times a darker side to their nature appears and they are cowardly, selfish and cruel. The characters' parents never appear in the movie and all verbal references to them are negative. We are left with the impression that these young adults are left to their own devices and they are growing up without morals. The film is shot in soft focus and the days are the perfect Summer idyll. The symbolism is a little unsubtle at times, but the performances are good. Catherine Burns received an oscar nomination.
19 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautiful late 60's youth flick!
shepardjessica-111 December 2004
Very intriguing late 60's film by Frank Perry with a great performance by Catherine Burns (nominated and SHOULD have won Supporting Actress). A young Barbara Hershey is attractive and full of verve. Bruce Davison is fine and Richard Thomas is sensitive and believable, but C. Burns as Rhoda is heartbreaking and wonderful. I don't know what happened to his young actress. She was also in RED SKY AT MORNING with Richard Thomas in '71.

An 8 out of 10. Best performance = Ms. Burns. A tale of youth that will stay with you. Nothing exploitive going on this film. Find it if you can. A beauty!
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very uncomfortable to view
innerlooper9624 July 2023
Last Summer is a movie that you'll want to see alone, or with someone you fully trust. The plot is well-captured prior to my review, and it's truly not difficult to understand the story.

Rarely, a movie captures my interest from start to finish, and Last Summer happens to be in this category. Aesthetically, the movie was beautiful to see. The golden, hazy effects of the camera work, along with the beautiful colors of the sea and even the hues of each character's eyes were all visually stunning. As a fan of the 1970s, it is easy to see how this movie captures the era perfectly (even if it's from 1969).

The main standout, however, is the discomfort I felt from early in the movie, until the very end. If you are a sensitive person, the increasingly awkward and eventually deplorable situations will be hard to view. The bird injury and 'operation', the reception of Rhoda into the group, the treatment of Anibal, and the final scenes of the seagull and Rhoda - will likely conjure the thought of "how did this movie get into normal theaters?".

Themes of narcissism, animals as property, people as property, justice, and the polarity between morality and acceptance all stood out. The characters are a combination of affable and deplorable. It's interesting to see how they shift: initially, we all feel a little annoyed by Rhoda, but eventually, she becomes the person you'd most want to befriend (at least in my mind). She is the person you want your daughter to be, with exception of how she is treated. We also feel charmed by the sweetness of the two teen boys initially, which morphs into a loathing.

It was also interesting to see that every genuine sentiment displayed in this movie - guilt, compassion, joy, and justice - was bestowed upon the seagull. Rather than experiencing the unpleasantness of acknowledging their emotions, Sandy, Peter and Dan would prevent that by turning to fits of laughter instead.

While it is repetitive to comment on this, I can't help lauding the amazing talent of Catherine Burns. She truly had a gift for becoming a character, and stirring the hearts of even the most disconnected viewer. It's a tragic loss that she did not pursue additional acting, and also that she passed away at 73.

A minor observation: Barbara Hershey was unrecognizable to me; I appreciated that her character was a naturally beautiful young woman who seemed comfortable in her own skin. This same actress portrayed a mother of two young women with eating disorders in the 90s ("Turning Point"), but in this movie, there is an appreciable amount of body-positivity that begins with her character.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amazing Performances
SMHowley10 June 2002
I caught this film late at night and stayed up until 4am watching it. It is a beautifully crafted story and intriguing to watch Barbara Hershey, Richard Thomas, and Bruce Davidson give such strong performances at the start of their careers. Catherine Burns, however, steals the film as Rhoda. Her performance is nothing short of screen perfection and should be required viewing for every actor. She gives a monologue about her mother's death that will leave you feeling as alone as she is.
31 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Thought Provoking, Ultimately Powerful Movie
bob-790-19601824 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
At first this movie looks to be one of those now-unwatchable "youth culture" films of the late 1960s and early 1970s, with the pop music, mop haircuts on the boys, and other fads. The early scenes with the seagull appear to be symptomatic of such movies. The bird supposedly symbolizes innocence and freedom, and the three youths share in these qualities by rescuing it.

Then comes the disillusionment. It turns out that the seagull is not a symbol, just a bird, a wild creature. After it bites Sandy (Barbara Hershey), she secretly crushes it to death with a rock. Goodbye innocence, hello cruelty.

There is another, more profound death mentioned, though not shown,in the film, that of the mother of the girl Rhoda (Catherine Burns), as recounted by her daughter. An expert swimmer, she was drunk when she undertook a challenging night-time swim on a dare. She was killed, and Rhoda spit on her grave because of her anger at being left alone. If the death of the seagull is the result of cruelty, the death of Rhoda's mother is the result of her selfish, reckless pursuit of fun, without regard for its effect on others.

Reckless pleasure-seeking is in fact the order of the day for the parents of all four young people in the film. Eventually we see plenty of the same behavior on the part of Sandy, Peter, and Dan; often it is combined with cruelty. The three kids tease and taunt Rhoda, they show contempt for her "date" Anibal and abandon him to be beaten by thugs, and ultimately they force Rhoda to submit to gang rape.

Even Peter (Richard Thomas), who is an imaginative, seemingly sensitive boy who has become fond of Rhoda and treats her kindly, joins in violating her. As Rhoda previously pointed out, around Sandy and Dan he becomes a different person.

The movie is an indictment of a society obsessed with pleasure, fun, and entertainment, with little sense of responsibility. It's a powerful, disturbing movie.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Totally Engaging...
JasparLamarCrabb2 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Two teens (Bruce Davison & Richard Thomas) come across the enigmatic Barbara Hershey caring for a sick seagull on a beach. She seems earthy, loving and caring. She's also unusually cruel. The boys are soon infatuated. Things get complicated when a fourth teen (another girl)joins the mix. As Rhoda, Catherine Burns is awkward, precocious and very sensitive (something Hershey is repulsed by). Frank Perry directed this totally engaging coming-of-age film and it's one of the best of his spotty career. He coaxes thoroughly natural performances from the three leads and a miraculous one out of Burns. Ironically, Burns, who received the film's only Oscar nomination, did NOT go on to have a career nearly as substanitive as Hershey, Davison and Thomas. The perceptive screenplay is by Eleanor Perry. Filmed on Fire Island, but the film could have taken place anywhere.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Finally, a teen beach movie without Frankie and Annette!
pmsboyz1 January 2003
One of the first teen-genre movies to show how cruel children can really be to one another. The sound has been regarded as bad and grainy by some, but to me, it put me right there on the beach with them. Stellar performances from the four young main characters, especially Richard Thomas and Catherine Burns (Supporting Actress nominee for this film). Barbara Hershey changed her last name to Seagull because of the impact a certain scene had on her. Bruce Davison is great as the sex-crazed boy trying to lose his virginity. The anti-climactic ending of being confused teens, struggling to understand the life going on around them and what could possibly lie ahead is one of the best. A chilling movie from 1969, this movie still holds up well and led the way for lesser imitations in the decades to come. An all-time favorite of mine, but if you watch it, don't bother with the edited version -- you'll miss so much.
37 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I Thought It Would Be Like a Bad TV Movie
reel_emotion6 December 2002
Warning: Spoilers
*****SPOILERS***** I thought Last Summer would be like a bad TV movie and was watching it for the camp factor alone, but somewhere it turns into a real, offbeat story about teenage characters experimenting with their boundaries during their summer vacation.

Sometimes the movie was like a morality play. And I think that must be one of it's main themes: society left to do what feels good and natural (i.e. the '60s) will become corrupt, violent, and self-destruct.

Sandy (Barbara Hershey), Peter (Richard Thomas), Dan (Bruce Davison), and Rhonda (Catherine Burns) are the main characters who play around the beach while their parents ignore them and act as irresponsible as their children. Dan and Peter--watch for homo-erotic undertones between the two that I thought was quite brave for the times--lust after Sandy, but she only flirts and teases with them. Sandy is sadistic, killing their rescued seagull--and moving on to her next victim, the geeky, naive Rhonda.

Barbara Hershey, the dark beauty, plays her part well as the manipulative, evil Sandy--who leads Thomas and Davison to rape Rhonda (and possibly kill her? The ending is too cryptic.). Her figure is startling as well as Catherine Burns', but Rhonda is suppose to be a little pudgy--you never see actresses weigh that much now. You can imagine if they made this movie today they would cast Reese Witherspoon as Rhonda! And she would do something like gain 10 pounds to make the character more real. It is also fun to see Richard Thomas getting away from his "John Boy" stereotype.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My brief review of the film
sol-9 December 2005
A carefully directed study of friendships, relationships and responsibility, the film is quite an amazing experience, with many well set up shots, excellent camera angles and brilliant framing. It is all edited very well together, with an emphasis on close-ups to make it all the more intense. The subject matter rather than the technical perfection is what is most impressive about the film though. With limited background information on the characters, we get to understand them as persons alone in the world with nothing much to do. The film is indeed about finding things to do in life among other things... so many other things that it is hard to sum them all up in a brief review like this. The levels of music and sound recording play important parts too and the acting is excellent. Catherine Burns was Oscar nominated, but Richard Thomas who arguably comes off as the best of the strong cast playing a character who is very uncertain of his feelings. It is hard to know where to begin and where to go when discussing this film. There is a lot to it, and it is superbly put together. It would definitely be best to see it before trying to read into any deeper discussion. Other than the abrupt ending, it is just masterful film-making that has to be seen for itself.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not particularly pointed, but with intense passages
moonspinner5512 October 2003
Pretty but restless, disturbed girl on Fire Island wields power and influence over two teenage boys and one plain-Jane, resulting in tragedy. Barbara Hershey, with her sharp-edged impatience and schizophrenic demeanor, is both luminous and foreboding, though the real star of the show turns out to be Gerald Hirschfeld and his striking cinematography. The script, based on Evan Hunter's novel, isn't pretentious but neither does it make any lasting conclusions (it's just a throwaway). The kids are shallow and vapid, even Catherine Burns as the Voice of Reason, and nothing in the dialogue seems to propel their intentions; it's all a director's conceit. Still, the ambiance and the well-considered build-up to the inevitable finale are captured vividly, and I could not take my eyes off Hershey: feral at times, sexual, and wild on the beach. **1/2 from ****
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Think twice before you watch this one....
planktonrules25 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
WARNING: Before you watch "Last Summer", you really need to be warned that the movie is quite adult and has a very traumatic rape scene. Many will find this too troubling--and perhaps it could bring back your own traumatic past experiences as you watch. I am not saying not to watch it--just be aware.

As far as the movie goes, it's well made but quite difficult to watch--not just because of the rape but because the characters are quite often jerks--very unlikable jerks. It is set at a beach community on Long Island. Three young people (Barbara Hershey, Richard Thomas and Bruce Davison) meet and soon become friends. However, it soon becomes apparent that there is a lot of sexual tension in these new friendships and a ménage à trois of sorts is in the making. From a voyeuristic point of view, the film is rather stimulating....but any sexual excitement on the part of the viewer may quickly disappear as you begin to see that these people (when together) become jerks. It's as if alone they are normal but together their inhibitions and sense of morality diminishes. Later, when they meet a nerdy and less attractive fourth member of their little group (Catherine Burns), this becomes all the more apparent and the three original members exploit this very vulnerable new member.

The acting is competent and the story is decent because it is unique and explores very dark aspects of supposedly 'typical' teens. And, fortunately, while the film has very explicit content, the director manages to hide most of what occurs through creative filming and it is not necessarily exploitational--just very, very dark. Frankly, I did not particularly enjoy the movie--it was a very tough viewing. But, it was well made and hence my overall score of 5.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A potent, poignant and overall disturbing teen coming-of-age drama sleeper
Woodyanders6 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
A strikingly clear-eyed and nonjudgmental portrait of adolescent explorations into sex, friendship, loyalty and cruelty which deftly captures the essential amorality and irresponsibility of that uncertain period of one's life with considerable candor and an admirable dearth of sentiment. Three carefree, unsupervised teenagers -- conniving, domineering, flirtatious strumpet Sandy (a deliciously wicked Barbara Hershey, wearing a skimpy bikini outfit that shows off a lot of her toothsome, voluptuous figure), aggressively libidinous Dan (Bruce Davison in his solid film debut), and the slightly more thoughtful Peter (a strong turn by Richard Thomas) -- become involved in a playfully steamy menage a trois on Long Island's tranquil Fire Island resort. The two guys are both completely infatuated with Sandy and vie with each other to seduce her. The rowdy trio engage in a wild group grope in a movie theater, drink beer, smoke grass, nurse a wounded seagull back to health, bask in the sun's unwavering rays, and cut loose during an especially crazed impromptu heavy petting/hair washing session. Their delicate, uninhibited fantasy world gets upset when pallid, pudgy, deeply uptight and morally responsible plain jane Rhoda (superbly played by the endearingly ungainly Cathy Burns, who deservedly got an Oscar nomination for her first-rate performance) enters their precious circle and steals Peter's attention away from Sandy. Eleanor Perry's astute, keenly observed script offers many painfully truthful moments as the gawky, confused main characters grapple with mortality (Rhoda's monologue about the untimely death of her mother is simply incredible), intense, unfulfilled sexual longings, sexual rivalry, and feelings of extreme callousness. Directed with great tact and restraint by Frank Perry, gorgeously shot in dewy, creamy, golden-hued soft focus by Gerald Hirshfeld (the expansive beachside scenery is positively beautiful), and marvelously acted by a fine cast, "Last Summer" rates as a quietly potent, poignant and disturbing sleeper.
25 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Chilling teen story
blindau5220 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Not the greatest film I've seen but it stays in your head forever. I saw it when I was almost 17. Barbara Hershey tops as a beautiful but cruel teen, rescuing an injured seagull and killing it later. Like the other readers, I wonder what happened to Catherine Burns, who played the nerdy intruder. In my high-school dramatics class, one girl told about Last Summer in a way that cracked everybody up (it has to do with the end so I won't mention it; one spoiler in this review is enough). This was a timely film that showed the dark side of hedonistic adolescence. It also has some funny moments, though I never got over the bird's fate (I hate cruelty to animals more than most anything in the world). I could see why the filmmaker felt the need to include that, to show how these nice-looking kids are both charming and mean. One good funny scene takes place when they're at the movies and Sandy is sitting between Peter and Dan. Another good scene (I'm trying not to add another spoiler) has Sandy talking with one of the guys and the guy says "I'm just thinking of them now."
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I don't think this was meant to be a good film. Mission accomplished.
hughman5519 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
There isn't anything very good in this film. The screenplay is flippant and shallow with a 60's style beach blanket bingo veneer containing pointless cruelty and rape. The performances from Hershey and Burns are good. Bruce Davidson gives no hint that he will become excellent though. And Richard Thomas, is Richard Thomas. What you see is what you get: cute, and serviceable as an actor. The killing of the pet seagull, and the gang rape at the end of the film, only make any sense in the plot if they are presented as the early manifestations of three burgeoning sociopathic co-serial killer/rapists practicing on their first victims. These types often begin with animals, the seagull, and then move to human victims, Catherine Burns. But that is not how this story is presented or written. It is just poured into your lap as "kids can be so mean sometimes". Well, there's "mean", and then there's "gang rape". And, if you're the ring leader in a gang rape, Barbara Hershey, this is just the beginning. But instead of the creepy scene, as in Hannibal Lecter at the pay phone foreshadowing the worst yet to come, this creepy little film just ends with all the rapists walking into a beautiful sunset, role credits... It should also be noted that the sound mixing is total crap. The ambient music covered up the dialogue in several places. And considering this screenplay, that may have been the point. If you like young hot bods in tight swimwear and don't mind pointless cruelty, this films for you. Count me out. I'd rather watch a lion take down a Zebra on Wildlife Kingdom. At least the violence I'm grossed out by there has a useful purpose in the food chain.
14 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Catherine Burns's Oscar nomination
smalljas-216 March 1999
If you write screenplays, don't miss Catherine Burns's "speech" about her mother in Last Summer - a more powerful, evocative use of single-character dialogue in a film probably doesn't exist. While I enjoyed the rest of the film, it couldn't match this moment, and it's easy to see why CB was nominated for an Oscar.
31 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disturbing but also slow and unpleasant
preppy-322 November 2014
Three attractive affluent kids--Sandy (Barbara Hershey), Peter (Richard Thomas) and Dan (Bruce Davison) meet on Fire Island one summer. They all start hanging out with Peter and Dan clearly attracted to Sandy. Then plump unattractive Rhoda (Catherine Burns) joins the group. Feelings erupt, complication escalate and it all leads to a VERY disturbing ending.

It's a coming of age film but a realistic one showing just how vicious teenagers can be. It's well made with superb acting by all four (Burns was nominated for an Academy Award) but I can't say it was a good film. The characters were unpleasant (Sandy is clearly a sociopath) and there are long dull stretches which go nowhere and add nothing to the plot. More than once I wondered where this film was going. However the harrowing final sequence more than made up for it. Be warned--the last part is extreme--the film got an X rating for that alone. So the acting and ultimate message make it worth seeing but it's sometimes pretty slow-going.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Kids Can Be So Cruel.
rmax30482323 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Three teens are spending the summer on Fire Island -- Thomas, Davison, and Hershey. I just love to see the young folks having fun and frisking around. And, man, they are radiantly happy, all sun tanned and drinking Heinekin's and doing a little grass and playing "Truth" and looking mighty handsome, all three of them. There's no jealousy between the boys, although they both have the hots for Hershey. But then there's no reason for jealousy because she lets both of them feel her up at the same time in the movie theater while watching a sexy Swedish movie.

There enters the picture Catherine Burns, not from New York but from Ohio. She's not ugly but she takes a little getting used to, next to these exemplars of bronzed and well-bred youth. She's shapeless and wears braces. Her hair isn't fashionably groomed and is configured like a Nazi helmet. On the vast white sand of Fire Island's beaches, her pale, plump figure is the only body that shines with the sheen of sun-blocker. She's moral too. She'd never take off her top and glow with self satisfaction as the two boys stare at her, while Hershey revels in their admiration.

The three sort of adopt her and try to teach her how to enjoy herself in accordance with their lights. She doesn't smoke or drink; she doesn't swim; she doesn't do dope; she looks and sounds like an adult and she has adult sensibilities.

So, one hot day, at Hershey's urging, the four of them go into the bushes and Burns is raped by the boys and left behind, with the sun a blistering crimson as it settles into the haze.

What is this movie about? Better to ask what was going on in 1968 when it was shot. There was a revolution under way in certain sectors of social space -- well-off white kids, mostly. The movie illustrates to the general audience what these spoiled narcissists were up to when they weren't carrying placards on the streets although, to be sure, not an iota of the outside world and its problems is ever mentioned. They're simply on the hedonic treadmill.

Whether it intends to or not, the movie also gives us a glimpse into human nature, which is not so flattering. Here are three kids who have everything they need and are free to do what they want. (There is hardly an adult to be seen.) And the world turns Hobbesian. Self indulgence is redefined to include inflicting pain on others. The Summer of Love is behind us -- and forget Flower Power.

That's what I got out of it anyway. That and the gradual suspicion that these teen agers of 1968 are now sixty-year-old urban bourgeois who are screeching about not wanting to pay taxes to support government freeloaders. They need the moolah for next year's BMW, the one with the 20 mm. cannon on top. Yes, Sandy, there is a certain strain towards diachronic consistency in cohorts. Some of us manage to grow older without really growing up.

I now step down from behind the pulpit. No, please. Save the applause. Just donate your next paycheck to Medecins Sans Frontiers. Thank you.

Barbara Hershey, running around clad in that skimpy bikini, is enough to generate a gonadal glow in any normal young man and tempt him to felony. Richard Thomas is the sensitive kid who kisses Burns and chats seriously with her, but only when they're alone, and at the end he turns as savage as the slightly beef-brained Davison.

The three of them had been reckless, selfish and cruel before, getting a nice Puerto Rican man drunk and leaving him to be beaten by a couple of thugs. And earlier, having saved the life of a sea gull, Hershey bashes its head in when it accidentally bites her finger. You have to govern that human nature carefully.

The performances are pretty good. I could believe each of the individual actors, and Burns is maybe marginally more convincing than the others. But the script has its weak points. NOBODY could be as frisky as the three kids at the beginning, and the transition to barbarity at the end is a little too quick. Pretty scenery though -- the summer beaches.
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Quite a movie for its time!
frank-45913 February 2005
I had the pleasure (if not outright fun), together with several of my friends at Fire Island Ferries, of participating in the production of this film. It was a fairly compelling and accurate portrayal of the late-60's counter-culture. Fire Island was certainly THE place to be during those summers.

Post-production, we were given the opportunity to preview it at a local theater. It quickly received an "X" rating due the explicit "rape scene" which was abridged to earn the "R" it carried when released. I wonder what circulation it got before the editing and re-rating. Are there any copies of the original ?
28 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Locations + review...
obfd2 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed this film, even with the disturbing ending. I grew up on this beach every summer, and the depictions were very realistic, especially the nonchalant way the kids were left to roam freely with no adults, as Fire Island was known to be a "safe" place for kids. I knew people like each of these characters growing up, and I felt they were quite realistic.

The locations in this film are as follows: The beach scenes and the house are in Seaview, NY, on Fire Island. The scenes in the woods are further east, between Point of Woods, NY and the Sunken Forest, on Fire Island. The scenes with the sailboat are shot near East Fire Island, in the Great South Bay. The dance club and the ferry dock on Fire Island are in Ocean Beach, NY. The movie theater and the restaurant are on Main Street in Bayshore, NY. The ferry dock on the mainland is the Fire Island Ferries terminal on Maple Ave in Bayshore NY.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great acting by a young group provides a moving, emotional experience
Desert_Fan9 January 2002
Set in one of the most beautiful beach settings on the East Coast, Fire Island, New York, Last Summer centers around the struggles of Rhoda, played brilliantly by Catherine Burns. After meeting the other three main characters on the beach, Burns goes along with them on several adventures in which Rhoda's past tragedies and present hangups come to the forefront. As the story progresses, Burns is drawn closer to the character played by Richard Thomas setting the stage for the stunning conclusion of the film.

These are four young people sharing experiences and feelings together, with happy moments and sad moments. I felt like I was there on the beach with them and it was deeply moving.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I thought it was very good, but...
C.S.Wood16 November 1999
I just didn't get the ending. Another reviewer said that it was the whole movie, but I just didn't see how that rape scene fitted into the rest of the movie, then just ending it like that. What was its meaning? Did she die? I was, and still to this day, completely confused.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Last and Least of a Summer to Forget **
edwagreen1 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Three obnoxious teenagers on Fire Island during a particular summer form a bond that leads to an unbelievable ending.

Nothing like a story about 3 teens, all of whom apparently come from wealthy families who pal around during the summer and meet Rhoda, a depressed teen, far from beautiful, who is basically in a world of her own.

Catherine Burns, as Rhoda, tells in detail the tragic drowning of her mother, 5 summers ago and this telling brought her a best supporting actress Oscar bid.

The unbelievable, tragic ending and the callous disregard of a human being is haunting. Otherwise, we're subjected to summer-time carefree leisure which to be perfectly honest is quite boring after a while.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Unbelievable Coming of Age Flick!
looneyv23 October 2004
One of the best movies in this genre I have ever seen; right up there with "Summer of 42", "Malena", etc. Truly funny but poignant at the right time; great performances by the leads and the unheard of Catherine Burns. Wow! Only problem is it's not on DVD and maybe not even VHS. One of my favorite movies is "Strangers When We Meet" (Kim Novak, Kirk Douglas, Barbara Rush, Walter Matthau); the book was written by Evan Hunter and, what do you know, it was only 30 yr. after 'Last Summer' came out that I find out "Last Summer' is based on a novel by Evan Hunter. Guess a leopard can't change his spots. You will not regret viewing this movie when on the tube or if available in some media format.
23 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Superior After School Special.
brefane21 February 2009
The summary is not meant to be a put down, just an apt description of Frank Perry's provocative, compelling and generally unsentimental coming-of-age film. Last Summer has allegorical overtones; the isolated island setting without adult supervision suggests Lord of the Flies. All the expected elements of a loss-of-innocence tale are here: sex, booze, pot, and homosexuality, but the atmosphere, acting and the dialog avoid clichés, even if the director indulges in a few. The four leads embody their roles superbly, and Thomas and Burns are particularly affecting. Burns received an Oscar nod for supporting actress. The feelings of power and powerlessness, isolation, and the herd mentality are persuasively rendered. Despite being released on VHS some years ago, this film has pretty much remained obscure. Worth seeing, and it holds up as well as 1969's Best Picture winner, Midnight Cowboy.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Misses the Mark
rwint12 January 2003
A seagull lays injured on the beach. A good looking teen girl (Hershey) comes to it's rescue. Later she meets two good looking teen guys who help her nurse it back to health and also become friends in the process. Soon the three bond in what has become traditionally known as the teen clique. Then Burns enters. She is not as 'hip' as the others nor is she as good looking. Her entrance into the clique causes a great deal of underlying friction and tensions. (Especially between her and Hershey). The film then pretty much plods along as it tries to explore how these tensions sort of ebb and flow. It finally ends with a completely unexpected and shocking finale.

Touted upon it's release in 1969 as a sophisticated and serious study of today's teens. Yet everything it shows we already know and take for granted. We all know that teenagers can be moody and their likes and dislikes can fluctuate. We also know that their can be a very severe line between the haves and the have nots. Some people will be destined not to fit in simply because they are not good looking or cool.

The only thing that seems mildly different is the ending, yet this too fails. There is no real explanation for it and there is no follow up. It simply ends abruptly and then we, the audience, are left to ponder it, which we don't because the rest of it just wasn't interesting or original enough. A much better way to have done it was to have it begin with the shocking climax and then have it work backwards. They could show through flashbacks what may have lead up to it, plus shown it's aftermath and consequences.

Instead we are given a very pretentious and slow moving adolescent character study that acts like it is saying way more than it really is. The teen characters, for the most part, are all typical and rather limited. There is no new insight for what they do nor explanation. The filmmakers seem as out of touch with the subculture as anyone else.
12 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed