The Young Runaways (1968) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Like something out of a late 60s TV show
AlsExGal17 July 2017
This film is about three suburban teens who run away to Chicago and encounter 1960s life in the big city. It was a time capsule with psychedelic music and a lot of "what's your bag/groovy" kind of talk. It reminded me of TV show episodes from that time that provided cautionary tales about the siren call of the youthquake of that era.

Brooke Bundy is a girl recruited by prostitutes. Kevin Couglin is a boy who runs out on his pregnant girl friend. He was a former child star, had a good role in "The Defiant Ones" "Bad Seed" herself, Patty McCormack ,is here as boy crazy teen who ends up in a triangle with two rock musicians. She's all grown up but still recognizable with those scary eyes.

The film is most enjoyable for all the familiar faces in the cast. Lloyd Bochner is Bundy's ad exec dad, a pre "Bewitched" Dick Sargent is a kind hearted guy who supplies food and shelter to runaway kids, James Edwards as a cop who works with juveniles, Norman Fell and Lynn Bari are McCormack's bickering parents and best of all, Richard Dreyfuss is a car thief.

Some of the dialog was trying so hard to be hip it ended up being camp but maybe it was because I wasn't use to actors like Dick Sargent speaking hippie-speak (yea, man can you dig it!). Then there are the strangely contemporary pink hues in the hair of the alcoholic mother of the runaway son, the sets, the costumes, and the jargon-laced dialogue especially from Dreyfuss all combined to make this a "Mod Squad" experience. All that was missing was Sgt. Friday of Dragnet showing up with his eyebrows knit giving all of these wayward youth a monotone yet rapid fire lecture.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
interesting transition
SnoopyStyle1 June 2017
Three young runaways find themselves in bohemian Chicago. Shelley Allen is tired of being sold to by her rich ad-man father Ray. She escapes from a creep driver and falls into the arms of prostitute Joanne Masters who is looking to turn her. Shelley escapes from Joanne and her Johns. She is saved by Dewey Norson who ran away for a mysterious reason. Deannie Donford is tired of her sexually repressed mother and father (Norman Fell). She moves in with musician Loch but then sleeps with his roommate Curly. A young Richard Dreyfuss has a supporting role. Meanwhile, the parents are searching for their kids.

This is a little transitional movie where the morality is mostly 50's but it's incorporating the 60's mostly as a cautionary tale. It doesn't give the parents a pass either. There is an attempt to bridge the gap. It's interesting to do the 60's in Chicago away from the cultural centers of NY and LA. It's also fun to see a young Dreyfuss doing his thing in one of his earliest film roles. The Deannie side of the story seems disconnected from the rest and could easily be cut. Mostly, this plays like a scared-straight movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unusually good songs
fredshuster6 February 2021
I enjoyed the film -- a 1968 scared-straight, after-school ditty with some ridiculous elements. But it also includes some really good songs -- songs that could've come from the pen of Love's Arthur Lee. I'm writing this today because Jim Weatherly -- who wrote those songs -- done died a few days ago. His best-known song is "Midnight Train to Georgia", recorded by Gladys Knight & the Pips, but the couple that are here are memorable, too. When I first saw this film about six or seven years ago on TCM and noticed the songs, I emailed Weatherly and we talked about the tunes. That wouldn't have happened with John Williams.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
strictly for laughs
David_Bradley24 January 2003
This movie is a good cautionary tale... for filmmakers! See this movie and try, try, try your best not to make anything this dumb and hopelessly out of touch. This is "Rebel Without A Cause" on pablum, baby! The best thing about this movie is watching Richard Dreyfuss putting his all into these horrible, meaningless lines. I mean, this is my bag, know what I mean? I mean, I'm all hung up in my own hassles, baby! The dialogue is screamingly funny, baby, and Mike Myers' vision of the Sixties is more accurate! And he wasn't even there! Neither, obviously, was the screenwriter, because Orville Hampton was fifty-one when this gigglefest was released in '68. My advice: get together with some real Sixties veterans (they should be at least fifty years old), have a few beers (low-carb, if they insist) and laugh, laugh, laugh. Turn down the volume and make up your own dialogue. You won't miss anything.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hilariously awful!
hemisphere65-15 April 2021
Terrible writing, directing, acting, music, and plot combined to form an unintentionally funny pile of garbage!

It's worth watching for laughs, but it's also full of notable actors and actresses. Isabel Sanford, Duck Sargent, Richard Dreyfuss, Brooke Bundt, Norman Fell, et al.

Horribly out of touch film attempting to draw young people back to the movies.

Even the theme song seems like a spoof of itself!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
You don't want to end up like this, students!
Varlaam4 September 1998
In 1974, our vice-principal -- who was also our guidance counselor -- made us watch this film. We were in Grade 8, it was the last week of school before the summer holidays, and we were soon going to experience the frightening world of high school.

Needless to say, we were completely absorbed. Our vice-principal's attempt to scare us straight certainly worked. To this day, I have never stolen a car! Thanks, Richard Dreyfuss.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Hollywood's Decline
twhiteson1 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Some of the silliest movies to ever come-out of Hollywood were a string of bizarre "youth" pictures that were made in the late 1960's/early 70's.

In the late 60's, Hollywood was hemorrhaging money. Its formula of big budget musicals and lavish historical/biblical epics to compete with TV which had kept the lights on and paid the bills into the mid-60's was failing spectacularly by decade's end. The studio system, which had made stars, had collapsed and its former stars had with few exceptions faded. Yet, Hollywood knew that there was a massive audience out there of young Baby-Boomers. If only they could reach that audience with movies specifically geared towards them then maybe the financial hemorrhaging could be reversed.

The result were some laughably absurd productions such as "The Young Runaways." The idea was to make movies that addressed the young and their counterculture with hip stories with supposedly hip young acting talent. Not a bad idea, but the execution was awful because the studios would use old pro directors and writers who didn't relate to the subject matter in the slightest. With "The Young Runaways" a nearly 60 year old director and a fifty-something old writer were dragooned into making a movie that supposedly spoke to the young. And not just any young, but the hippie free spirits of the late 1960's. The results are unintentionally funny at best and cringe-worthy at worst.

The plot: three young runaways (Brooke Bundy, Kevin Coughlin, and Patty "The Bad Seed" McCormack) from safe, small, white-bread all-American towns flee to Chicago's hippie district to get away from problems at home. These characters, always impeccably groomed and dressed, face various tribulations while trying to adjust to their new surroundings. Meanwhile, various parents (one of them Normal Fell) search for their children in the midst of hippie central. Dick Sargent (aka the 2nd Darrin) plays the proprietor of a hippie hostel.

It's basically two story lines: the Brooke Bundy and Kevin Coughlin characters hook-up and live domestically by adopting traditional male-female roles with the man working and the woman cooking. Meanwhile, the Patty McCormack character sleeps around with hippie musicians. Guess who comes to a bad end? The movie flaunts the dying production code with shots of the very attractive Miss Bundy in her underwear and a plot string about high-end call girls luring unsuspecting innocents into their profession.

The funniest thing about "The Young Runaways" is the performance of young Richard Dreyfuss, fresh off his uncredited appearance in "The Graduate," as a hippie moocher, car thief and draft-dodger. His dialogue filled with late 60's hippie slang is a riot. His character's terrible fate is a warning that it's not all that "groovy" to be a mooching, car-thieving, and draft-dodging hippie.

"The Young Runaways" was just one of many laughable studio attempts in the late '60s to find commercial success by appealing to then ongoing youth counterculture. They almost all failed. Eventually, the studios threw-up their hands and decided to let young, hungry wunderkind directors to film whatever in the hopes that something might work. Thus, ushered in the reign of the auteurs and one of the artistic golden ages of Hollywood.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Many citizens have wondered where John Wayne Tracy . . .
oscaralbert14 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
. . . (aka, Chicago's Clown of Death) got the idea to found his charnel house. It's patently obvious that Tracy's inspiration for his House of Horrors was THE YOUNG RUNAWAYS. Blame the Many Greedy Mobster movie studio for releasing RUNAWAYS, which blabs to the world's sects deviants that there are 15,000 stray kids up for grabs at any given moment in the Windy City. Furthermore, this film pictures a smarmy "guru" housing three dozen of these social misfits for parts unknown. Though a younger version of that CLOSE ENCOUNTERS dude burns alive, the fate of this suspect's remaining captive audience is left murky at best. RUNAWAY viewers get the distinct impression that occasional donations (with a few clown performances thrown in) to the beleaguered Chicago cops will pretty much give the donor "carte blanche" open season on a stock yard's worth of Lost Boys. After all, who will miss two or three dozen of them?
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ok, I admit it, I've watched this movie countless times...
elliottrainbow20 April 2001
Warning: Spoilers
This movie seems to have vanished from the minds of most movie lovers. I really don't know how well it did at the box office when it was released in 1968 but I found it on TNT about 10 years ago and I thought it was great. It may be a little predictable but I think it has a great story and acting. Brooke Bundy is outstanding as a teenager who can't communicate with her father (Lloyd Bochner, who later gained fame for the scene in Dynasty where his character dies while having sex with Alexis Carrington, played by the under-rated Joan Collins) and so she runs away. Patty McCormack (still the bad seed!) is very good as a runaway who comes to a bad end. Kevin Coughlin (who would later die in a car accident) has a good role as Dewey, the runaway with a good heart. Also in the cast is Dick Sargeant (the 'other' Darrin Stevens) and Richard Dreyfuss as a car thief as well as a few bit players who look familiar but probably aren't. I have this movie taped if anyone is interested.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Don't let this happen to YOU!
mls418224 March 2021
I don't know why they call this the YOUNG runaways.

Most of the actors are mid 20s to early 30s. Richard Dreyfus runs away at age 32. He's a draft dodger who speaks only in hippie lingo. Patty McCormick is lovely as a girl who meets the wrong guys. Brooke Bundy is always great to watch because she doesn't act, she just WHINES her way through every project. It is good the girls brought along their false eyelashes because jobs are scarce - except for "modeling." Brooke lost her suitcase and is taken in by two girls working as "models" willing to get her in the business. Uh oh. Entertaining. Dated. Moderate camp value. Watch for the always fabulous Isabel Stanford in a small role. Be careful out there people!
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good Cautionary Tale
ivan-2210 February 2000
This is a less pretentious "Rebel Without a Cause". It is lighter, more pleasant and digestible. Coughlin shines, and he also wrote the charming title song, sung by the sadly forgotten Arthur Prysock. It is highly ironic, that whereas Dreyfuss was a bit player and Coughlin the lead, five years later, the roles were reversed on the memorable Gunsmoke episode "This Golden Land" where Coughlin plays a bit part and Dreyfuss gets a chance to shine. This film is preachy, but in a respectful and loving manner. And it has an artistic dimension.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ridiculous, but not that much fun
Wizard-88 June 2017
The Metro Goldwyn Mayer studio was by the late 1960s in serious decline due to a number of factors, so much so that they eventually started to experiment with product that just a decade or so earlier they never would have touched. "The Young Runaways" was one of those experiments, an attempt to tap into the growing youth market. But I'm sure that any youths back then that saw this movie probably found it somewhat unbelievable and unrelatable. The movie plays out in an extremely dated way even by 1968 standards. It doesn't understand that most youth runaways were fleeing households that were truly abusive and unlivable - the problems facing the youth runaways in this movie seem really insignificant. And the lives of youth runaways in this movie seem really cushy compared to the hellish life youth runaways typically have on the street. All this is somewhat silly, but it isn't inspired enough to make the movie true unintentional comic gold. Most of the movie feels really bland and predictable instead. By the way, if you think that you might be getting the opportunity to see some serious exploitation due to the fact that the movie got an "R" rating in 1968, be warned - by today's standards, the movie would (barely) get a "PG" rating, and could play on prime time network television without any edits at all.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed