Sound of Horror (1966) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Saw this movie on Shock Theatre in the 70's!
Flowbeer22 June 2006
Back in the old days of television, with no cable and only 3 channels available, I was still very lucky to be able to catch some fine horror gems like this one, along with other more-scary films such as 'Children Shouldn't Play with Dead Things' and 'Twisted Brain'. For years I never knew what the title of this film was, I just knew it was an invisible monster who screeched loudly and slashed people's faces & bodies apart! I loved the scene with the flour, where they had layed it across the floor, so you could see the creatures' foot-steps coming closer to them, holed-up in the cabin....it's a far-fetched film, but I loved it as a kid but could never place the title & never saw or heard of it again...until a few months ago! There is a video dealer in NYC who helped me discover its' title and I was able to buy it off ebay (oldies .com has it also) and am proud to have been able to find this old gem! It may not be for everybody, but there's something about a horror film, when seen as a kid or teen....it will always stay with you and to find it again is kind of like finding a lost love or family member! I give it 6 out of 10 stars ******
21 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This film scared me as a child.
argentofan22 July 2003
I remember first seeing this film on television back in the 1970's. At that time I watched it in the middle of the night. It played right after Brides of Blood. At the time I didn't know what the film was called but years later I read about the title in a film book. Now I have been able to see the film again after nearly 30 years as it has become available on DVD (although a poor print). The film still has it's scary moments and is notable as being Ingrid Pitt's first film as well as featuring Soledad Miranda. I can't give the film a high rating as it is very slow overall but the sounds the creature makes as well as the death scenes are very well done for such a low budget film.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The greatest Spanish invisible dinosaur movie ever made
sam_hill769683 May 2006
With this type of film there always seems to be a sentimental this-scared-me-as-a-kid review. And I supposed this one is no exception. I saw it once on TV as a kid. It scared me. I've never forgotten it. And I never saw it again until recently when I picked it up as a discount DVD.

As others have said this is a very low budget effort from Spain that employs a cheap gimmick to scare it's audience. It's monster is not seen, only heard. And what is heard is a particularly creepy series of sounds.

But the problem for the film's detractors is that this gimmick seems to work.

Like the famous swimming pool scene in the superior Cat People, it tricks the audience into imagining something more horrible than what could be shown.

The movie's greatest asset is that it's director seems to know how to scare his audience. For instance there are long, sustained shots in which very little happens. But this serves to create tension, causing us to wonder, "What is coming next?"

In watching it again, I kept thinking how well this would have worked as a radio play. The way it uses only sound and narrative to frighten the audience, it reminded me of Wyllis Cooper's classic The Thing on the Fourble Board.

For those who need vivid color, big stars and intrusive CGI effects, let them rent Anaconda.

And for those who have trouble suspending disbelief over the film's gimmick: Who's to say there weren't any invisible dinosaurs? How would we know?
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A film as rarely seen as an invisible dinosaur!
uds35 April 2002
Don't know why I'm bothering to compile this review as obviously no one is ever likely going to read it, seeing as how the film has to date attracted just ONE other review and no votes in all the years it must have been here!!

Let me tell you something...dubbed it may be, but for what was obviously an ultra low-budget entry in the horror film genre (I mean, how cheap can the fx for an invisible dinosaur be???) it delivers both suspense and horror, even in black and white, which strangely adds to, rather than detracts from, the events at hand.

Comparable I suppose (and not necessarily favorably) to the invisible monster from the Id in FORBIDDEN PLANET, this newly hatched dinosaur takes out, quite unpleasantly I may add, several of the would-be treasure hunters that disturb its cave somewhere in Greece. It also emits quite a chilling noise during its approach, giving rise to the title which in most countries outside its native Spain, was THE PREHISTORIC SOUND (not surprisingly).

Some really long lasting images here. The scientist who first has his face slashed to pieces as he enters the cave. The survivors plight as they surround their refuge with flour (or something similar) to give them at least some warning of the beast's proximity. This sequence is especially well-done and highly suspenseful. The concluding scenes I will not divulge but are, let me say, unexpected and a cut above the usual (no pun intended!)

Decent little movie folks - trust me, I'm a reviewer!
33 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Amazingly intelligent screenplay overcomes flaws of wretched print.
mark.waltz6 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Greek archaeologists are excavating a cave when they come across what look like giant eggs of some kind. These mysterious items seem to be inhabited by some force of evil, and one of them ends up in the place where the archaeologists are staying. In spite of warnings from the dour housekeeper (Calliope!), the group (and their sexy women companions) continue to try and find more valuables in the cave, and all of a sudden, a horrific sound is blasting their eardrums and all sorts of mysterious violent deaths begin to occur, literally slicing up the victim's faces with the culprit or spirit totally unseen. This leads to some gruesome moments in the film and philosophical conversations of what really could be going on. While these moments are impressive and the deaths extremely frightening, the Z-grade budget and horrible print make the film sometimes difficult to watch. It lacks in the camp element of other horror films of the time, and therefore, may not be of interest to "Midnight Movie" fanatics. Acting is slightly above average for this type of film, but some elements seem out of place, especially the suggestive dance one of the women suddenly breaks into. For me, this simply says that some mysteries of our earth are better left uncovered, and what you don't see can be a lot more frightening than what is right in front of your nose.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Invisible Dinosaurs?
gavin694229 October 2013
When a group of isolated people in the Greek mountains set off a cave explosion, they are menaced by an invisible shrieking dinosaur that had been buried for eons.

As it happens, director José Antonio Nieves Conde was fairly prolific from the 1940s through the 1970s. Unfortunately, he was mostly prolific in Spain, and therefore little known in the United States. I wonder what other gems he has to offer and how easy they would be to track down...

This film also features the debut of Ingrid Pitt, which has to be worth something. This is a cheap horror film (invisible dinosaurs are about as inexpensive as it gets), but having Pitt in there makes it quite important in retrospect...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sound Of Horror...a 40 year old sleeper
action-express26 November 2009
If you are a fan of vintage, cult horror movies like I am then you will absolutely love this movie. I cannot believe that it has no cult following! I can't even find a movie poster for it. Although it is a low budget, dubbed, Spanish movie it has a great story with very good acting and the effects are as cool as can be.

Overall it is made in the typical fashion of horror movies of this period but has some real surprises along the way. The acting and dubbing is far superior than most. The sets are good. The camera work is average or a little above. But the story is very good and interesting with many scenes that I do not want to give away. The black and white make it moody and pretty scary. There are some rather gory effects especially for the time. The monster is invisible for the most part yet you can really imagine it from some cool footprints and the blood curdling noise that it makes. You really worry for the people in this movie. It also has one of the most surprise endings that I have ever seen in a movie of this era.

Another reason that I can't understand why this movie is not out there is that it is Ingrid Pitt's first movie role. She is lovely as ever but looks a lot different than her 1970's roles.

This movie is a must for vintage horror fans.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Monster with the Invisible Touch
wes-connors9 February 2009
"A group of archaeologists is exploring mountains in a remote part of Greece when they stumble across an unexpected find. While blasting away the rock to find the hidden treasure, the explorers awaken a prehistoric creature with the power of invisibility. Only the shrieking cries of the approaching monster give its victims any warning to their terrifying fate," according to the DVD sleeve's synopsis.

Dubbed "Sound of Horror" in English, this Spanish horror film doesn't make a bit of sense, if you think about the plot. But, when you consider the time, and what the production must have cost, it manages to provide a fair bang for the buck. The direction, by José Antonio Nieves Conde, is exemplary. And, you get to see Soledad Miranda (as Maria) and Ingrid Pitt (as Sofia) play pretty roommates, potential rivals, and possible monster food.

**** El sonido de la muerte (1964) José A. Nieves-Conde ~ James Philbrook, Soledad Miranda, Ingrid Pitt
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Much better than I would've expected
vigilante407-124 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Sound of Horror was a very pleasant surprise. I bought it as part of Mill Creek Entertainment's Tales of Terror boxed set, and was expected a bad seventies flick along the lines of the Legend of Bigfoot. Instead, I get what has to be one of the better Spanish sci-fi/horror flicks that I've ever seen.

True, the fact that the monster is an invisible dinosaur is, to say the least, somewhat lame. But it is carried off fairly well here, as there is a lot of suspense maintained in the film when it really counts. There are few real special effects, with only about three actual optical process shots. The cast is excellent, though the characterizations are pretty stereotypical for the time period.

I think that Sound of Horror most reminded me of a Mexican horror movie from the sixties ... but a good one without the expository narration to explain what's happened in the last three films. I enjoyed this movie, and would recommend any genre fans to give it a look.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
invisible Dino
vampi19608 July 2006
If you wanna skimp on the budget of a movie,make the monster invisible. this is an awful mess of a movie.explorers find a dinosaur egg that hatches into a ...., invisible dinosaur.the only notable in the cast is British actress Ingrid Pitt.wasted in this crap.i believe the budget for this was about $2.98.theres good music and sound effects,but the movie is very dull.it must be seen to be believed.it may have been a little better if it was filmed in color.but a late sixties movie in black and white just doesn't look too good.1 out of 10.bottom of the barrel.the worst,and only invisible dinosaur movie ever made. i originally saw this on; chiller theater on channel 11,new york.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Treasure seekers find way more than they planned on!
reptilicus22 November 2006
How do you save money when you want to make a scary movie? Easy, just make the monster invisible! It worked (sort of) with INVISIBLE INVADERS (1958) where not only the aliens but also their spaceships were invisible. That is just what happens in this movie only it isn't space aliens this time it's . . . well hold on, I'll get to that.

This b/w Spanish movie offers a bunch of old war buddies who are searching the mountains of Greece for art treasures hidden during WW2. To do this the start blowing holes in a mountain which the locals say is cursed. One blast does uncover a mummy but no his name isn't Popoca and he doesn't come back to life; that's another movie you are thinking of. They also discover a fossilised egg which they decide to take back to base camp. Unknown to them there was a second egg which cracked open. The contents, a blob-like substance, oozes out and . . . vanishes! Not long after that the men are planning what to do with the wealth they are soon to have when they dig up all those treasures (no one worries that the governments of the countries the artworks were stolen from might want them back but just keep repeating "It's only a movie, only a movie, only a movie . . ."). One man wanders outside to enjoy the night air when suddenly he hears footsteps but no one is close then. Then an ear piercing shriek rips through the night air. When the others find the friend he has been ripped to pieces. But who . . . or WHAT . . . did it?

Okay here is what you have been waiting for. The young dinosaur popped out of the egg that hatched but he (it?) just happens to be . . . wait for it . . . invisible! Now this dino is just about mansized but his teeth and claws, plus the fact that you cannot see him until it is way too late, give him the advantage. The treasure hunters cannot even run to their truck and drive away because it might be waiting for them! Hmmmmmm, I'd say we have a problem here.

Effects are surprisingly gory for a movie from 1964 and the suspense is really well constructed. The effects are fair, jump cuts are used the dino's footprints appearing in the sand and when an axe is thrown at the beast it is a blue-screen shot that only semi works. So is this a good film? YOU BET! It is the sort of thing that will make you feel like a kid at the movies on Saturday afternoon again. Of special interest is the inclusion of 27 year old Ingrid Pitt and 22 year old Soledad Miranda in the cast. Both would go on to achieve stardom, Ms. Pitt in Hammer Films and Ms. Miranda in movies for Jess Franco. The movie stops dead in its tracks so both women can dance.

So do we ever get to see the dinosaur? Should I tell you or let you find out for yourselves? Ah, the movie is available from several DVD sources so . . . er . . . "see" for yourselves. you will not be disappointed.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Spanish monster movie in which an invisible creature stalks a motley group of archaeologist
ma-cortes8 January 2013
This is a cool Spanish horror film from the 6os finely directed by Jose Antonio Nieves Conde , a slick craftsman . A group of isolated people expert on archeology in the Greek mountains formed by three adventurers "André" (Antonio Casas), "Asilov" (James Philbrook) and "Dorman" (Jose Bódalo), seeking a hidden treasure in a cave in a remote rural area of Greece . Accompany them in their search "Pete" (Arturo Fernandez), a hired driver in Athens, "Sophia" (Ingrid Pitt), the Asilov lover , and "María" (Soledad Miranda), daughter of "Andre" . Ignoring the warnings from local residents, who claim that the cave is cursed, and following an old map, "André", "Asilov" and "Dorman" use dynamite to open unexplored caves. They set off a cave explosion , one blast exposes two major prehistoric eggs that are apparently petrified . They are menaced by an invisible shrieking dinosaur that had been buried for eons . "André" leads one to the cabin where he is staying in the care of a local employee, "Calliope" (Lola Gaos). The egg opens and escapes inside a prehistoric monster invisible beeps awful, capable of causing death. As a dinosaur egg hatches and out lashes an invisible predator .

Thrilling film in low budget plenty of chills , suspense , screams and lots of blood . I admire creative effort to keep budget down , but this time is too little . The invisible monster is an original and imaginative resource that lets you play with a certain ambiguity and , at the same time, contributes mightily to create an oppressive ambient and haunting atmosphere . Predictability of the plot, written by Americans named Gregg Tallas and Sam X Abarbanel outlining causes of settings and characters , but not hidden at any time a script perfectly constructed, that transcends its status monster movie to approach the field of cosmic terror. Science has a role in the development of anecdotal history, full of mythological references and legendary as the legend of the Golden Fleece , the monster as a symbol of moral punishment of greed . You'll have to use your imagination as archaeologist are slashed to bits by the show terror carried out by the estrange creature . The spectator does not know at any time the dimensions and physical characteristics of the monster , but the abominable sound emitted is more than enough to imagine the horror it represents. This is an effective and simple movie ; it results to be an acceptable Spanish-American co-production with a Spaniard all-star-cast such as Arturo Fernandez , Lola Gaos , Francisco Piquer and Jose Bodalo-Antonio Casas , both of whom played many Spaghetti Western ; in addition a B Series American star as James Philbrook . Furthermore two cult female stars as the British Ingrid Pitt , Hammer's ordinary , and Spanish Soledad Miranda , Jesus Franco's usual . Passable cinematography in black and white by notorious cameraman Manuel Berenguer who photographed several American movies , though being necessary a right remastering ; it was filmed at Samuel Bronston studios and on location in Hoyo de Manzanares , La Pedriza , Madrid . Intriguing and suspenseful musical score by the classical composer called Luis De Pablo . The motion picture efficiently produced by Gregorio Sacristan was compellingly directed by Jose Antonio Nieves Conde , a director of great quality . He was a drama expert (Surcos, El Inquilino , Marta , Casa Manchada) , religious cinema (Balarrasa, Cotolay) , Comedy (Don Lucio Y Hermano Pio) and even terror as¨ Sounds of horror¨ , one of the least known and appreciated films but is nowadays best considered .
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
If you want to see (or not see) an invisible dinosaur this movie is for you
dbborroughs7 August 2005
This story of an expedition digging up an invisible dinosaur wouldn't be a bad if it wasn't for the fact that the idea of an invisible dinosaur, in and of itself, is really stupid. Shot on the cheap, we never see the rampaging monster, we only hear its cries moments before it devours someone or does some damage. I'm sure it kept the budget down, but it also keeps the interest down. The idea is okay for a couple of minutes but since you never see anything you simply don't care after a while. Actually you do care since the cast and the story telling are good enough to make you wish that they had had enough of a budget so we could see this monster. Its nice that the cast cared enough not to phone in their performances, but its not enough to make you really want to watch this movie more than once or even all the way to the end. I really can't recommend this movie to anyone, although if you ever have a bad plot premise movie festival this would be required viewing.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cheesy but fun, interesting stars
inkybrown10 January 2002
This is an adventure/horror movie about a small group of treasure hunters. They are excavating a cave in the mountains of Greece, where a rich treasure of stolen artwork is said to be hidden. Despite warnings from the locals that the cave is cursed, they continue to look for the treasure. One of their explosions accidentally releases an invisible shrieking dinosaur that has been buried for eons. The recently hatched dinosaur terrorizes the people on the expedition, killing many of them as the opportunity arises. This is a pretty cheesy movie, but the suspense is actually good in places. Interestingly enough, this movie starred two actresses who would go on to become cult stars of European horror movies: Soledad Miranda and Ingrid Pitt.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
They got to be kidding us
bigchin_0020 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Picked this up as a discount purchase & I'm not sure if I want my $3.99 back. This is a story about an invisible dinosaur who starts chewing up a bunch of archaeologists. Does that sound crazy? It is even crazier than that premise sounds. Did they choose an invisible dinosaur because it was cheaper to make the film that way? Did they choose a weak scriptwriter because it was cheaper to make the film that way? Methinks "yes" on both accounts. In one scene the invisible dinosaurs kills somebody inside a house. It's supposed to be an invisible T-Rex so can they explain to me how a T-Rex gets into somebody's kitchen? The plusses: two early performances by two genre movie queens, Soledad Miranda and Ingrid Pitt. I don't think either one of them would rank The Sound Of Horror high on her resume. If you watch it with the mindset that this is a mid-1960s cheapie you could get a few chuckles out of it. It's not dreadful but it is pretty awful. Just for having Soledad and Ingrid I've decided to let them keep my $3.99 and maybe I'll watch this again in another 10 years.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The sound of boredom.
planktonrules1 September 2013
I cannot think of a single reason to watch "Sound of Horror". It is terrible but not terrible enough to be of any use to a bad movie buff. And, when I try to think of anything good about it, I am stumped. To make it worse, the print which is available through Alpha Video is absolutely terrible--though I cannot imagine anyone in their right mind wanting to restore the film!

"Sound of Horror" is a cheap Spanish horror film. And, like most horror films of the day, it's been sloppily dubbed into English. Because it is so cheap, they cannot afford nice costumes or sets, so they have come up with an amazing gimmick to hide the cheapness of the film. Instead of creating some ridiculous monster out of rubber, pipe cleaners and toilet paper roles (or the like), they avoid the problem altogether by having the monster be invisible! This is awfully funny but dumb. So, instead of seeing the creature, you hear horrible screaming every time this monster attacks a group of treasure hunters. Now that I describe it, this does sound a bit interesting. Trust me, however...they manage to keep it from being the least bit entertaining! Talky, dull and never the least bit good.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Here it comes...EEEEAAHH!!!
wbswetnam1 March 2012
The Sound of Horror is a mid-60s Spanish horror film set in Greece. Some men are looking for buried treasure after obtaining both halves of a secret treasure map which leads them to an old cave. After blowing up portions of the cave, they discover a mummy, a skeleton, and some semi-petrified dinosaur eggs. One of the eggs hatches to produce a transparent dinosaur-like monster which terrorizes the men and the ladies. Not content to stay in its cave, the monster roams around and attacks the cabin where the people are staying.

The suspense factor is actually not bad, I'll give the suspense factor a six. The special effects are awful though. There are a couple of brief flashes of the monster (it looks like a plastic Godzilla model picked up at a discount toy store) and stop-motion effects to show the footprints of the monster walking through the flour. Finally, the monster shrieks sound like a person going "AAAAAHEEEAAAAAHH" and nothing more. Anyway the monster gets one star.

The stunningly beautiful Soledad Miranda, however, gets a solid eight just for the Greek dancing and standing around looking so pretty. Overall, not bad, I give it a four.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Treasure hunters accidentally release an invisible dinosaur from a cave and fight to survive!
mastertech4829 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film in the early seventies, on TV, on a Saturday afternoon. I missed the beginning of the film but VERY shortly got hooked on the storyline. What I saw I LIKED! The movie's simplicity, it being in black and white, and some surprisingly good acting, make this one slick little film! As far as "B" movies are looked upon, this one actually is extremely good!!PLOT SPOILERS AHEAD!!! DO NOT READ FURTHER IF YOU WANT TO WATCH A REALLY SUSPENSEFUL MOVIE!! As stated, the film is about a group of treasure hunters who unwittingly release a terrible, screeching, invisible, dinosaur from inside a cave they were exploring. This beast is large, utterly ferocious, and has long claws.It exudes an animal scream that'll make your skin crawl! It's totally invisible, too--and this low-budget film makes the most of it. The hapless prospectors have only a small house for refuge. They also have an old, broken-down four-wheel drive vehicle parked a medium distance from the house with which to escape. Most of the movie deals with the people trying to devise a way to either kill the beast or escape. You find out later the dinosaur is female and that one of the folks inadvertently took an egg for a souvenir. The egg eventually just begins to hatch, the baby inside, not yet able to achieve invisibility, is smashed to death by the frightened people. The mother creature is constantly prowling around outside, completely unseen. Finally, one of the people devises an ingenious plan to spread flour all around the house so they can have some short warning and know the whereabouts of the animal. BIG SPOILER TO ENDING HERE--DO NOT READ FURTHER!! They eventually conjure up a plan to attract the creature to the vehicle and set the gasoline tank ablaze. This burns the screaming beast to death but, in the sooty smoke, you finally get to see the raptor-like dinosaur revealed.

This is a popcorn munching movie, containing constant suspense, very passable acting, a simple plot that WORKS, and very real danger. If you want to kill some time and watch a good film from yesteryear, this is definitely worth your time!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
60s production, 50s B-movie sensibilities
I_Ailurophile14 September 2022
One scene speaks volumes about this movie. Not fifteen minutes in, we see a woman dancing for a couple minutes. There is some dialogue in this scene that meekly advances the narrative - but more prominently, other characters clap to the music, except they're not in time with the song, nor in sync with each other. This, by the way, is a few minutes after a long, lingering shot of a cave interior, during which nothing happens.

Much like the plethora of B-movies that filled theaters and drive-ins in the 1950s with often bland, low-grade sci-fi or horror flicks, 'Sound of horror' isn't exactly captivating or essential. The most noteworthy aspect might actually be the cast, as recognizable Soledad Miranda and Ingrid Pitt both star. Beyond these names, the film's claims include sometimes flat and unnecessary dialogue and scene writing, somewhat deficient exposition, lazy direction, and a score that while satisfactory could be cut and pasted to or from any comparable title without really losing anything. The acting isn't always convincing, and the basic orchestration of some shots or scenes struggles with stilted pacing.

The premise isn't perfectly inspiring, but it holds promise, and there are some good ideas here. Why, recognizing the broad limitations and faults of the pictures whose company 'Sound of horror' joins, it's worth pointing out the obvious, that the only intent was ever outlandish genre fun. In all fairness, while this feature is less than riveting, it's suitably enjoyable. The writing can effectively be boiled down to "Just So" - sufficient to weave together a tale of horror, and that's about it. That doesn't mean it's bad, but there's no questioning the nature of the film before us, not least as plot development generally leaves something to be desired in one way or another.

At its best 'Sound of horror' is a bit viscerally entertaining, with decent blood and gore, or slightly hair-raising where the titular audio is employed. At its worst, one can only wonder why they ever sat to watch it. The movie does improve as it goes on, and the last third bears minor thrills, though overall remains uneven all the while. When all is said and done it's not especially remarkable in the grand scheme of things, yet this is a step above some of its brethren; you could definitely do far worse. Know well what you're getting into if you come across this, and don't get your hopes up just based on those involved, but if you're looking for something modestly enjoyable that you don't have to actively engage with, 'Sound of horror' is passably worthwhile.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Terror you can't see
Chase_Witherspoon10 June 2012
From the opening credits introducing the cast members scampering across the wilderness, pursued by an unknown assailant, you know you're going to get something a little different and that promise lives up to expectation in this Spanish thriller. A trio of treasure hunters converge on a haunted cave searching for an elusive cache of rare antiquities that has evaded them since their first brush when they were soldiers in WWII. But after discovering what may have been the long lost chest, they inadvertently release a terrible, shrieking creature that also happens to be invisible.

More than meets the eye to this cast, with Amercian James Philbrook cast as the stoic, unofficial leader of the trio (the other two Casas and Bodalo), his girlfriend Polish bombshell Ingrid Pitt in her film debut, while the ill-fated Soledad Miranda is the leading lady, a rising star who died prematurely in a car accident only a few years following this film. All the cast discharge themselves with professionalism and tact, no hysterics or over-zealous rants, very measured, solid performances. I thought Lola Gaos as the superstitious Greek housekeeper - whose frequent warnings go ignored until too late, - was a highlight, the scene in which she fetches the water, suspenseful and exceptionally well photographed.

There's plenty of atmosphere in the black and white cinematography, decent sets and calculated suspense, the film's multi-pronged climax is engaging and leads to an unexpected conclusion that won't disappoint. Perhaps the only faux pas is the fictitious Greek setting and characters, all of which looks and sounds very Spanish. Better than expected, worth a look.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Well, at least it has Ingrid Pitt and Soledad Miranda in it
BandSAboutMovies10 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
In the Greek countryside, archaeologist Dr. Pete Asilov and Professor Andre are trying to find a treasure in an abandoned cave. This uncovers a reptile-like creature that soon vanishes.

Andre's housekeeper Calliope warns him that there are curses and angry spirits and monsters in the cave, but he doesn't listen. When the rest of his business partners arrive - bringing Ingrid Pitt in her first screen role - he keeps pushing, despite further warnings, the decayed body of a cavewoman, a set of bones and one of the men being killed by the creature. Soon, they'll be more worried about staying alive than they are as to whether or not they get the gold.

For a movie that bills itself as an SQ Picture (Shiver and Shake, Quiver and Quake), this is a pretty silent affair. That is, until the girls just randomly decide to dance for the boys. Oh yeah - the professor's niece Maria is played by Jess Franco's muse Soledad Miranda, so that makes this movie a million times better than it would be otherwise.

There's a great near-silent sequence where Calliope is stalked by the reptilian monster (which could also have fit into yesterday's there). And hey, look at that lobby card! So I guess perhaps there's a little more going for this film - like the tension when everyone is barricaded in the house and the allusions to the atomic age - than just Ingrid Pitt and Soledad Miranda.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Pleasant Surprise
blamire11 August 2003
It ain't the budget, it's how you use it. Ignore the obvious limitations (mediocre dubbing, lack of effects, etc.) of this little horror film and enjoy the decent direction that manages to generate more suspense than most A thrillers. There's even a scene that reminded me of Val Lewton (that's right--Val Lewton!). This is just plain fun, with scares, a decent atmosphere and an often effective music score. And it's available on a budget DVD so how can you go wrong?
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Derivative Spanish monster film works a treat
Leofwine_draca29 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
With its title a parody of a well-known Julie Andrews musical, SOUND OF HORROR is an engaging film – and an odd one too. There's just some combination between Spain and monster flicks that make for distinctly distinctive movies; see, for instance, later '70s fare like THE LORELEY'S GRASP for another example. SOUND OF HORROR recalls the classic '50s monster movies popular around the world and it reminded me of BEAST FROM HOLLOW MOUNTAIN, although there's no obvious similarity between the two flicks.

The cast is an engaging bunch and for a change the dubbing doesn't affect the performances too badly. The male characters are typically stern and bluff, but the focus is on the two female characters, played by Soledad Miranda and Ingrid Pitt. Both found fame in the 1970s, the former in Jess Franco skinflicks and the latter in Hammer horror skinflicks, and both lend equal glamour to the proceedings. They seem to spend an inordinate amount of time either dancing, wandering around in loose-fitting nightwear, or sunbathing, which I guess is the point.

Of course, the main gimmick of this flick is that the monster is invisible. This is an effective idea; not only does it cut down on the budget, it also makes things that little bit creepier, as there's no rubber-suited or back-projected menace to date the film; instead, the viewer's imagination supplies the effects. The monster's cries are seriously spooky, although they do sound a little like a guy suffering from stomach pains on occasion; they had a shiver or two going up my spine. The script, written by an American, is better than most and focuses on stuff the viewers want to see, i.e. conflict between the group and encounters with the sinister terror. Director Jose Antonio Nieves Conde never really worked on any famous productions but he does an admirable job here, keeping things tight and never letting the pace flag too much.

A spooky soundtrack adds to the atmosphere and the film's also surprisingly gory for its age – we see victims slashed to pieces by the monster. Perhaps they got away with it because it's black and white, but even so these moments are mildly shocking today. The climax, a variation on the classic house-under-attack format seen in THE BIRDS as well as about a hundred other horror movies, is effective, utilising clever scenes with flour and floating hatchets, and there's a good ending involving a twist with the car. Sure, SOUND OF HORROR is a B-movie through and through, but it's an effective, mildly scary one that's both well-made and well-directed.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Stupidosaurus!
Hitchcoc6 February 2007
It's not all bad. The dubbing isn't very good and so the dialog really detracts from the story. Some of the translation is a bit bewildering. It's all how they react after they find out what is going on that just doesn't work. It is hard to face invisibility, but there are some things one might think of. The scene with the flour (or whatever that is) and the hatchets is really stupid. Apparently the invisible dinosaur glides along the ground or has an invisible bicycle. I hate to criticize these things too much because all they are is a two bit make-up artist and some pretty weak actors. The special effects don't even include the gratuitous prints in the sand. It would have required some stop action, and that probably wasn't in the budget. The movie involves two types of people: those that run to the house and those that hang around outside and allow themselves to be destroyed. There is a great amount of suffering as we can hear by the beast's cries. It's just a pretty bad movie.
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
RIDICULED AT WORK ******** still i recommend this to sci-fi fans
jethrotull20 February 2005
as a collector of vintage sci-fi movies from the 20"s through the 60"s i have found many use a cookie cutter mentality with no new imagination,that does not mean they are not good movies, but the story often is not very original,been done before,etc., that said, i like the story of the sound of horror even at the risk of being ridiculed,*** (my co-workers broke into tears of laughter when i told them i liked a movie about an invisible prehistoric dinosaur)***these same individuals looked me straight in the eye and told me how believable it was to them that a family could feed and pet a brontosaurus in Jurassic park!*** give me a break!*** anyway,that being said, i find sound of horror to be very unique in imagination and concept,the film was obviously a low budget production,yet,it has more intense suspense than some million dollar movies of later vintage. the only available copy at this writing is just a "fair" print quality wise,and the movie was Spanish origin with English dubbing,** still, i recommend this movie to serious "vintage" sci-fi collectors, its very different and thats what makes it stand out among the crowd.*** it really is kind of creepy,*** even today,*** turn the lights out when you watch it!***creepy soundtrack highlights it also! ****
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed