How the West Was Won (1962) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
210 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Awesome epic Western with giant cast , gorgeous photography and wonderful scenarios
ma-cortes3 April 2014
Turbulent and mighty story about a family saga set against the background of wars and historical deeds ; covering several decades of Westward expansion in the nineteenth century--including the Gold Rush , the Civil War, , Pony Express , Telegraph , confrontation between cattlemen and homesteaders . And of course , the building of the railroads and career between Union Pacific and Central Pacific to arrive in Promontory Point ; among other epic events . As a family of Western settlers from the 1830s to the 1880s , beginning with their voyage on The Eerie Canal and going on to encompass a Civil War battle and other happenings .

The picture gets great action , expansive Western settings , shootouts , love stories , it is quite entertaining and there some some scenes still rate with the best of the West , including marvelous moments along the way . It efficiently describes an attractive panoramic view of the American Western focusing on the tribulations , trials and travels of three generations of a family . It's a big budget film with good actors , technicians, production values and pleasing results . Awesome as well as spectacular scenes such as an exciting white-water rafting sequence , a train robbery , a thundering buffalo stampede and Indian attacks . The Civil War is the shortest part and the weakest including a brief acting by John Wayne as General Sheridan and Harry Morgan as General Ulysses S Grant . Particularly supreme for its all-star cast list with some actors epitomising the spirit of the early West , at least as Hollywood saw it , including a Mountain man as James Stewart , a rogue card player , Gregory Peck , and Debbie Reynolds is notable here as a gorgeous dancer seeking fame and fortune . Not many of the players have a chance to register as a bearded Henry Fonda as a scout , Walter Brennan , Lee Van Cleef , Agnes Moorehead , Ken Curtis , Raymond Massey as Abraham Lincoln , Agnes Moorehead , Thelma Ritter , Mickey Shaughnessy , Russ Tamblyn and an interminable list ,

Impressive cinematography filmed in Cinerama, and photographed in splendorous Metrocolor , though it loses much of its breathtaking visual impact on TV but otherwise holds up pretty well . All four cinematographers were Oscar-winners such as William H. Daniels , Milton R. Krasner , Milton Krasner , Charles Lang Jr and Joseph LaShelle . Rousing musical score by the classical Alfred Newman , including an immortal leitmotif . The motion picture was spectacularly directed by three veteran filmmakers , they were enlisted by producer Bernard Smith to handle the multi-part frontier stories relating exciting exploits of an ordinary family . Of the five segments, Henry Hathaway directed "The Rivers", "The Plains" and "The Outlaws", John Ford directed "The Civil War" and George Marshall did "The Railroad". Some uncredited work was done by Richard Thorpe. The picture won Oscar 63 to Film editing , Sound , Story and Screenplay . Rating : Extraordinary film , essential and indispensable watching . It's a magnificent example of the kind of old-fashioned blockbuster just don't make anymore .
48 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
After nearly 50 years the movie still works
criticlh-127 January 2010
I have loved this movie since I saw its original theatrical release. The new (2009) DVD release finally does it justice. Digital stitching technology has made the 3-part Cinerama image almost literally seamless. In fact there is less distortion where the frames meet than there was in the original theatrical screening. And for the first time in a video release the full width of the Cinerama screen has been captured. About a third of each of the two side images was missing in previous video versions. This version is so wide that a wide-screen HDTV still requires black bars at top and bottom to fit the image on the screen.

Yes, there are moments we wish we could re-write, such as the narrator's reference to "primitive" people. This is balanced, however, by an unusually fair (for the time) treatment of the plight of the plains Indians. The movie holds up remarkably well, thanks to a well- written script and strong performances by a large A-list cast. With the exception of a scene in which Debbie Reynolds breaks into a song-and- dance number in a wagon-train encampment (the excuse being that her character is a singer) there is almost nothing that betrays the era when the film was made. Well, there is the fact that most of the cast members are long dead.

As a professional historian, I have to say that the almost complete absence of reference to specific historical events (except the battle of Shiloh) is part of the secret of the film's success. This is a movie that captures the myth of the American west, a myth that is still alive and powerful.

This movie was made for the biggest screen ever, prior to the Imax era. The absence of true close-up shots (a limitation of the Cinerama process) is more noticeable on a smaller screen. It deserves to be seen on the biggest wide-screen TV you can find. And it does deserve to be seen.
41 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A star-studded Western epic
sme_no_densetsu20 June 2010
"How the West Was Won" is one of only two dramatic feature films made using Cinerama's three-strip process. Watching the film on home video represents a compromise but Warner's latest edition offers as good a presentation as you're likely to see outside of a Cinerama theatre.

The film, which was based on a series of 'Life' magazine articles, traces the fortunes of the Prescott family as they take part in the westward expansion in 19th century America. The story unfolds over several decades and touches on the Gold Rush, the Civil War and other periods in American history. James R. Webb's screenplay, while more entertaining than historically exhaustive, won him an Oscar.

The cast is about as star-studded a bunch as you're likely to see anywhere. Where else can you see Jimmy Stewart, Henry Fonda & John Wayne all in same film? Not to mention Karl Malden, Gregory Peck, Eli Wallach, Richard Widmark, Walter Brennan and others too numerous to mention. Needless to say, the acting is in good hands.

Technically, the film looks quite nice. The Oscar-nominated cinematography is breath-taking and Alfred Newman's score is top-notch. However, the filming process made for an overabundance of long shots and there are a few instances of rear projection that frankly look bad next to the rest of the picture. Also, while not a fault per se, there are geometric distortions inherent in displaying the curved picture on a flat screen.

Yet, despite its minor imperfections, "How the West Was Won" is an attractive and engaging epic Western. As a history lesson, it's somewhat superficial but the combination of fine acting and stunning visuals make it well worth your time. Just be sure to pick up the Special Edition or Blu-ray release.
28 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
How Hollywood Struck Back Against Television
Theo Robertson26 October 2011
In the early 1960s Hollywood found itself under attack by television so had to wheel out some big guns . THE LONGEST DAY and HOW THE WEST WAS WON were a couple of these howitzers . Film,s that lasted several hours full of episodic structure with big names playing the characters . Watching these type of movies years later you can see the thinking behind them but do seem overblown with hindsight and you can also see why film makers wanted to make more intense movies via New Hollywood in the 1970s

That said HTWWW is by no means a bad movie . If there's a problem with it it's the narrative problem of trying to squeeze 100 years of history in to three hours of cinema and to a large degree the film succeeds to a large extent . It also deserves some credit for using Debbie Reynolds and George Peppard - neither of whom were the biggest names in the movie - to play the main linking characters

And yet the problem of the narrative is impossible to overcome entirely successfully . The story remains episodic and has every cliché under the sun . Men are men and women are thankful . White men tend to be extremely good or extremely bad and the indigenous population are noble savages who become mere savages when white man speak with forked tongue . There's also the annoying production value of people standing in front of back projection which jars with the numerous establishing shots taken on location. It's also a conservative film with God frequently getting a name check

But for the most part it's an entertaining Western even for those of us who don't like the genre . Perhaps the reason it does work is because it's so traditional where the world is portrayed in black and white , a world that has never existed in the first place
29 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent Epic Western
doug-balch30 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This is an excellent movie. I gave it 7 out of 10 IMDb stars, which is a very high score for me. It did very well in my ranking system, accumulating 17 points. This places it comfortably inside my top 20 all time Westerns, although my project is far from complete.

Here's what I liked:

  • I love multi-generational narratives i.e. stories that follow sets of families as they live and die through several decades. This is an extremely effective way to present historical fiction and was perfected by one of my favorite authors, James Michener. In 1974, Michener published his own excellent grand pioneer novel called "Centennial" . This was made into a pretty good TV mini-series in 1978.


  • I like the epic sweep of the film historically and geographically, telling stories from the Erie Canal pioneers all the way to the "end of the West" lawmen.


  • Many parts and scenes were very effective in terms of sentimentality, especially when George Peppard's character returns home from war and passes his mother's tombstone.


  • Those who are familiar with my ranking system will understand how much I appreciated an entire section devoted to the Civil War. The movie also treated its Indian characters multi-dimensionally. Although it did contain an important Mexican character (played very well by Eli Wallach), it failed to allude effectively to the broad Hispanic culture of the region. In a longer mini-series format, I'm sure this would not have been neglected. This omission kept the movie from busting the maximum three point score in my Civil War/Indian/Mexico category.


  • It's a great looking film, of course, with lots of big budget on location set pieces. It must have been quite an audio visual experience in the theater for 1962 audiences. Even on a home TV, the rapids scene, the buffalo stampede and the train wreck are quite harrowing.


  • The music and soundtrack were well done, with many period folks songs and lots of sweeping orchestral music to match the many natural landscapes that were filmed.


  • I thought the characters were well developed i.e. I was able to really care about a lot of them. The stories moved along nicely and there were only a few plot holes.


  • Gratuitous romantic female roles are a common fault in Westerns. This movie had two strongly developed female characters, the sisters played by Debbie Reynolds and Carroll Baker. The more I watch Carroll Baker, the more I like her. She was great in "The Big Country" and "Cheyenne Autumn" as well.


Now here's what kept the movie from being better:

  • This opinion might surprise some, but I thought the casting was a weakness in the movie. All star casts are awkward. It was kind of like watching a rock and roll Hall of Fame awards show, where Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, Jimmy Page and Bruce Springsteen all get up on stage together and play a Beatles song. They all get in each other's way so much, no single musician has an opportunity to display his individual artistry. The result is usually an incomprehensible mess.


In movies, pairing so many superstars together doesn't present as big a problem as in music. These guys were all excellent in their cameos. I particularly enjoyed Henry Fonda as the "super scout". My point is simply that you're not getting the full benefit of having Henry Fonda in the movie when his role is so limited.

I'm also not against this type of ensemble casting. I had fun watching all these old pros, especially since they are the veterans of so many other Westerns. I just think it would have been a much stronger movie if they had turned over a primary role to Wayne or Fonda.

As it was, the real co-leads of the movie were Debbie Reynolds and George Peppard. Although they were both very good in this, the bottom line is that the weakest actors had the biggest parts

  • Even with almost three hours of running time, they bit off more history than they could really chew. This needed a six hour TV mini- series format, and that might not have been enough. As a result, the movie suffers from being "a mile wide and an inch deep".
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Big Names in Winding Western Epic
SnoopyStyle26 December 2013
This is an fashion western of a multi-generational Prescott family encompassing every stereotype as America settles the west. The Prescott family is heading west starting from the Eerie canal. They encounter pirates and a fur trader Linus Rawlings (James Stewart). It's a good start, but the leads keep changing.

Instead of following Jimmy Stewart and Carroll Baker all the way through, it switches to Debbie Reynolds and Gregory Peck as they go to California. On the way, they have an old fashion settlers and Indians shoot out. Then we switch back to Carroll Baker and George Peppard as the Civil War gets started. And it keeps going with different lead actors until the closing flyover of a Californian freeway.

There is something very superficial about all of this. It's like a high school history textbook being fitted into a western movie. There are big action scenes. There are big named actors. Maybe there are too many big names. The time span is too long, and the endeavor too grand. It tries to say so much that it ends up saying very little of value.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"I Am Bound For The Promised Land."
bkoganbing21 November 2006
I still remember seeing How the West Was Won in Cinerama when it made it into general release back in 1962. A motion picture theater equipped for Cinerama is the only way this one should be seen. The formatted VHS copy I watched tonight can't come close to doing it justice.

James R. Webb's original screenplay for the screen won an Oscar in 1962 and it involves an episodic account of the Presscott family and their contribution to settling the American west in the 19th century. We first meet the Presscotts, Karl Malden and Agnes Moorehead going west on the Erie Canal and later by flatboat on the Ohio River. They have two daughters, dreamy romantic Carroll Baker and feisty Debbie Reynolds. The girls meet and marry mountain man James Stewart and gambler Gregory Peck eventually and their adventures and those of their children are what make up the plot of How the West Was Won.

Three of Hollywood's top directors did parts of this film although the lion's share by all accounts was done by Henry Hathaway. John Ford did the Civil War sequence and George Marshall the sequence about the railroad.

The Civil War piece featured John Wayne and Harry Morgan in a moment of reflection at the battlefield of Shiloh. Morgan did a first rate job as Grant in his brief cameo and Wayne was playing Sherman for the second time in his career. He'd previously played Sherman in an unbilled cameo on his friend Ward Bond's Wagon Train series. I'm surprised Wayne never did Sherman in a biographical film, he would have been good casting.

If any of the stars could be said to be THE star of the film it would have to be Debbie Reynolds. She's in the film almost through out and in the last sequence where as a widow she goes to live with her nephew George Peppard and his family she's made up as a gray haired old woman and does very well with the aging. Debbie also gets to do a couple of musical numbers, A Home in the Meadow and Raise A Ruckus both blend in well in the story. Debbie's performance in How the West Was Won must have been the reason she was cast in The Unsinkable Molly Brown.

Cinerama was rarely as effectively employed as in How the West Was Won. I well remember feeling like you were right on the flatboat that the Presscott family was on as they got caught in the Ohio River rapids. The Indian attack and the buffalo stampede were also well done. But the climax involving that running gun battle between peace officers George Peppard and Lee J. Cobb with outlaw Eli Wallach and his gang on a moving train even on a formatted VHS is beyond thrilling.

There is a sequence that was removed and it had to do with Peppard going to live with buffalo hunter Henry Fonda and marrying Hope Lange who was Fonda's daughter. She dies and Peppard leaves the mountains and then marries Carolyn Jones. Lange's part was completely left on the cutting room floor. Hopefully there will be a restored version of How the West Was Won, we'll see Hope Lange and more of Henry Fonda.

And it should be restored. All those Hollywood legends in one exciting film. They really don't make them like this any more.
78 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Amazingly Awkward
LeonLouisRicci23 February 2013
Cinerama was the most ambitious flop in Movie history. From the beginning it was a slave to the format and therefore restricted close-ups and any natural movement. The upside was its ability to sprawl the image across a curved screen allowing a panoramic view of wide open spaces, mostly landscapes.

Seeing the Film in its original format in a specially equipped theater lent a certain thrill otherwise unavailable. In that environment it could overwhelm as spectacle and some of the more usually demanding devices of Movies could have been overlooked as the awe inspiring epics unfolded on the over-sized, oddly shaped, screen.

But as a Movie this is at best a lightweight affair with some corny story setups and relatively little else but the backgrounds. The musical numbers didn't help either. There are some undeniably exciting scenes and overall it ends up nothing more than a magnificently mounted experience, and aside from the thundering action scenes there is little else to be admired. in fact, some of it is downright cringe-worthy and awkward.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Bound for the promised land, indeed.
hitchcockthelegend15 April 2011
One of the last great epic movies to come out of MGM that was a roaring success, How the West Was Won still has enough quality about it to warrant high praise. The story that drives the film on was suggested by the series of the same name that featured in "Life" magazine 1959. Narrative is formed around one family, the Prescott's, who set out on a journey West in 1839. They and their offspring fill out five segments of film that are directed by three different men, "The Rivers", "The Plains" & "The Outlaws" is under the guidance of Henry Hathaway, and "The Civil War" by John Ford and "The Railroad" by George Marshall.

Filmed in the unique Cinerama format, which in a nutshell is three cameras filming at once to project a fully formed experience for the human eye, the production has an all star cast and four supreme cinematographers aiding the story. To name all the cast would take forever, but in the main all of the major parts were filled by stars who had already headlined a movie previously. The cinematographers are naturally key since such a sprawling story inevitably has sprawling vistas, they come up trumps with some truly special work: William H. Daniels, Milton Krasner, Charles Lang Jr. & Joseph LaShelle, four great names who help to make the film a poetic beauty.

As a whole it's undeniably far from flawless, complaints such as it running out of steam towards the end (the irony of it since a steam train features prominently), and the plot contrivances, are fair enough. However, when the film is good, it's real good: raft in the rapids, Cheyene attack, buffalo stampede and train robbery, each of them are good enough to be a highlight in separate movies. Even the songs are pleasant, particularly when they revolve around the effervescent Debbie Reynolds, while home format transfers are now finally up to a standard worthy of investment, time and cash wise.

Hard to dislike for a Western fan, and carrying enough about it to lure in the casual viewer, How the West Was Won really is a case of they don't make them like they used to. 8/10
45 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I can't believe this movie won an Oscar for best screenplay.
alfiefamily15 July 2004
"How The West Was Won" was part epic part gimmick. The gimmick being one of the first non-documentary films made in Cinerama. I agree that a story about the opening of the frontier sounds like a terrific idea for this type of gimmick. But the screenplay, and even some of the acting is so ridiculous that the gimmick can't pay off.

Yes it's great to see all of these great actors on screen together. But what were they thinking when they decided to let Debbie Reynold's character be the thread that holds the stories together? She's not bad through most of the movie, but when she is an old woman, this is cartoon time.

She's not helped by the inane script. Unfortunately, I believe Richard Widmark has the worst of it, as a demanding railroad owner. And could someone please tell me what that scene between Henry Morgan (looking like a dwarf as Ulysees S. Grant) and John Wayne was about?

I did think that Karl Malden, as a Quaker from the waterfront, playing Carrol Baker's father was humorous. And James Stewart as her beau (must have been 30 years older than her)was hard to watch. But wonderful Thelma Ritter saved the day.

Beautiful scenery, great cast, lousy writing, uneven acting, different directing styles that don't mesh, and lines running up and down your screen because of the gimmick, add up to a movie that should be seen but not taken seriously.

6 out of 10
69 out of 129 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Underrated . This is one heck of an epic film . Loaded with many favorite stars James Stewart, John Wayne, Gregory Peck, Carroll Baker.
robfollower20 February 2019
Underrated . This is one heck of an epic film . Loaded with many favorite stars James Stewart, John Wayne, Gregory Peck, Carroll Baker, Lee J. Cobb, Henry Fonda, Carolyn Jones, Karl Malden, George Peppard, Debbie Reynolds, Richard Widmark, Robert Preston, Eli Wallach, Brigid Bazlen, Walter Brennan, David Brian, Raymond Massey, Agnes Moorehead, Harry Morgan, Thelma Ritter, Mickey Shaughnessy, Russ Tamblyn, Spencer Tracy ...Narrated by (voice) Just rap your brain around these actors .

Filmed in panoramic Cinerama, this star-studded, epic Western adventure is a true cinematic classic. Three legendary directors (Henry Hathaway, John Ford and George Marshall) combine their skills to tell the story of three families and their travels from the Erie Canal to California between 1839 and 1889. Spencer Tracy narrates the film, which cost an estimated $15 million to complete. Westward expansion shows scenes of the Indian's sorrow, the white man's greed, river pirates, outlaws, lawmen, and life and death on the Western plains. Dozens of marquee names worked with over 12,000 extras, 630 horses, hundreds of horse drawn wagons, and a stampede of 2,000 buffalo. The human cost of the concept of Manifest Destiny is revealed in all its colorful and violent glory. How the West Was Won garnered three Oscars, for screenplay, film editing, and sound production.

A story as big, as brash, and as exciting as the west itself. You have to hand it to everyone involved, this is one mammoth viewing experience. This covers generations as well as historical events like no other movie has attempted to do. I think the wisest decision was having multiple directors so each time period has a different feeling and vision. There is no denying the spectacle, the adventure, and the romance in How the West Was Won. It really is true to say they don't make them like this any more.
33 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Deep Cast Main Attribute Of Otherwise So-So Film
ccthemovieman-112 March 2006
This isn't as spectacular as you might think after checking the cast credits, which are almost beyond description. However, it's still a pretty solid movie. For a western, I was shocked years later to view this on widescreen VHS and discover the number of songs in here, most by Debbie Reynolds. Early on, I wondered if I wasn't watching a musical rather than a western.

The real story of this movie, it would seem, is the cast. If you want to see a "Who's Who" of the time period, then you have to check this film out. Narrated by Spencer Tracy, it features - in alphabetical order - Carroll Baker, Lee J. Cobb, Henry Fonda, Carolyn Jones, Karl Malden, Gregory Peck, George Peppard, Robert Preston, Reynolds, James Stewart, Eli Wallach, John Wayne and Richard Widmark and a bunch more. Are you kidding me???!!!!!

This was also one of the first Cinerama widescreen films put on a VHS tape, I think. I was anxious to see it in that format, but then disappointed there weren't more panoramic scenes. Outside of two - a buffalo stampede and a train robbery - the scenery was just fair.

Peppard had the best part of the film, in my opinion. He was featured in the final third. (The film seemed divided into three distinct segments.) Stewart was the key man in the first third and Peck in the middle. Baker and Reynolds provided the eye candy. I was surprised how small a role Wayne had in here.

The VHS box says the movie is 162 minutes long but it you eliminate three overtures (the eginning, the intermission and ending) you can chop off another 15 minutes of actual footage. In summary, the cast is the only thing special as the story and the songs are just so-so.
17 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More quantity than quality, but a truly all-star cast
bwaynef10 April 1999
Watching a letterboxed version of "How the West Was Won," I noticed the dividing lines on the screen, and it was clear that much of the picture was still missing even in this format. But neither hindered my enjoyment of this sprawling epic, even if James R. Webb's Oscar winning screenplay left something to be desired. Alfred Newman's music score is terrific, and so is that all-star cast. Unlike those disaster flicks of the 70s like "The Poseidon Adventure" and "The Towering Inferno" that claimed to be stuffed with stars but actually boasted "names" (usually familiar performers, primarily from TV, who rarely headlined a first class feature), "How the West Was Won" has the genuine article. John Wayne, James Stewart, Gregory Peck, Richard Widmark, Henry Fonda, George Peppard, Robert Preston, Carroll Baker, and Debbie Reynolds may mean little at the ticket windows of the 90s (and many of them are dead, anyway), but all were above the title stars who carried their own films at the box-office in the early 60s.

Three directors helmed this project but I'd be hard pressed to distinguish whether John Ford, George Marshall or Henry Hathaway were behind the camera during any particular episode if the opening credits didn't identify each segment and its director. I suppose "How the West Was Won" is more quantity than quality, but it's entertaining overall.
48 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad West
dutchs-114 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film in the theater in 1962 and then not again until I just watched it on DVD. In the early '60's, Hollywood produced a number of "all-star" extravaganzas featuring absolutely anybody on the A or B list. The comedy in the series was It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World, and when I saw it recently after a hiatus of 40+ years, I thought it stood up well. Dated, of course, but what a joy to see all those comedy greats hamming it up. HTWWW isn't so fortunate - maybe it's because a comedy doesn't have to take itself so seriously.

To me, this film ties with Magnificent Seven for the best Western score of all time. But there's so much singing in this film I wondered if it ought to be classed as a musical. And the songs are so out of context or such obvious set pieces I wondered at times if it wasn't a Bollywood film.

The first segment, crossing the Appalachians, is the weakest. I was expecting the stars to look very young, given the vintage of the film, so I can only conclude that Karl Malden was born old. James Stewart and Carroll Baker have the hokiest accents imaginable. And the geographic absurdities are legion. The Erie Canal goes to the Great Lakes, so why do the emigrants end up on a raft on a white water river? James Stewart encounters them - he's going upstream and they're going downstream, a point repeated several times. He continues on his way, encountering river pirates, who leave him for dead and smash his canoe. (Why? Why not just beach it and use it themselves?) This means the pirates are upstream of the emigrants, who are headed away from them. But the pirates set an ambush, and sure enough, the emigrants soon come into view, having somehow teleported back upstream. Despite having been stabbed, James Stewart pitches in to fight the pirates and seems totally unhurt afterward. Then the emigrants go on their way but perform the geographically impossible trick of taking the wrong fork going downstream on a river. They careen through a raging mountain river in a deep canyon, then come ashore to bury their dead on perfectly flat land.

The rest of the movie is better. But no wagon train ever set out with autumn leaves on the trees - the whole point was to get to the Pacific before the snow began. The Cheyenne attack is the best cinematography in the whole film, but it was filmed at the foot of the Sierra Nevada in California. Mount Whitney is actually visible a couple of times. And one scene shows the inside of a tumbling wagon, which is completely empty except for the hapless passengers. Wasn't the whole point of a covered wagon to carry everything for the trip? Then, when everyone has made it to California, we see a Sacramento riverboat passing high bluffs, when in fact the land along the Sacramento River is flat as a pancake.

The Civil War sequence seems perfunctory. We see vignettes of battles and field hospitals but there's no coherent narrative. They do show a soldier being prepped for surgery with chloroform, a sound piece of history and downright amazing for 1962. Contrary to innumerable films, most Civil War surgery used anesthetics.

The good news is the visual quality of the DVD version is stunning. A few panoramas with a lot of sky show the Cinerama frame joins, but they're gradational, not sharp lines. And the score is still one of my all time favorites. But this is just not a terribly good movie.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A visual experience like no other
tomgillespie20029 March 2016
Very much like IMAX's grandiose stand against the emergence of internet streaming, Blu-Ray and the 'Golden Age of Television', the 1950's saw studios battling against the arrival of a television in every home, and used the likes of 3D and 'Spook Show Spectaculars' to draw the public in. Another short-lived fad was Cinerama, a process of shooting with three synchronised cameras and creating an ultra widescreen effect in the process. It was a headache for film- makers, notably John Ford, and special cinemas had to be built to house the format that required three projectors and a deeply curved screen.

Also like IMAX, Cinerama was intended mainly for documentaries, but its immediate success meant that it wouldn't be too long before studios started to turn to features. The first was The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm in 1962, and How the West Was Won came later the same year. The latter is the most ambitious, telling a story stretching 50 years across three generations and boasting a cast of '24 great stars' (as the poster informs us), taking us through the major events of America's expansion further west and employing four first-rate directors - John Ford, Henry Hathaway, George Marshall and the uncredited Richard Thorpe - to bring it to life.

Whilst the ambition can only be admired, How the West Was Won is a mixed bag. In part a rough-and-tumble, old-fashioned western that offers differing perspectives of America's venture out west, as Henry Fonda's grizzled buffalo hunter Jethro Stuart laments the bloody consequences of the railroad's arrival under the command of Richard Widmark's ruthless and treaty-dismissing overseer, the film also cannot resist the lure of grand song-and-dance numbers, with Debbie Reynolds husky voice and knee-slapping becoming tiresome very quickly. It also keeps the audience at a huge distance, both emotionally and literally. With so much picture being captured, actors are routinely squeezed into the centre of the frame with their facial expressions too far away to see.

Broken up into 5 segments - The Rivers, The Plains, The Civil War, The Railroad and The Outlaws - we follow the Prescott family, led at first by Zebulon (Karl Malden), as they head for the frontier and encounter mountain man Linus Rawlings (a woefully miscast James Stewart). Rawlings falls for eldest daughter Eve (Carroll Baker), and the family spread out from there. Hathaway directs three of the five, with the best being the Outlaws section, which pits George Peppard's Zeb Rawlings. a marshal, against bandit Charlie Gant (Eli Wallach), and delivers a set-piece on top of moving train which is as technically impressive as anything made today (a stunt-man almost died during the filming).

Ford's Civil War segment is the slightest but offers an interesting insight into the war. In one fantastic scene, General Ulysses S. Grant (Harry Morgan) drunkly ponders his effectiveness to General William Sherman (John Wayne) as the young Zeb Rawlings listens, demonstrating Ford's lack of fear in showing a brittler side to a man considered an unshakeable American hero. But Ford and the film in general never really commits to the themes it hints at, and this is ultimately what makes How the West Was Won such a frustrating experience. As the camera sails across modern America before the closing credits, I felt slightly appalled at what had been done to this once-beautiful country but couldn't really figure out if this was how the film intended I feel. As a visual experience, it is truly like no other, but it remains oddly hollow emotionally and thematically.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun western classic / epic.
punishmentpark17 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A fun western classic, though not your average type of western, due to lots of romance and adventure that is in this two and a half hour long epic. Three directors (well, four, really), five stories (six, if you count the historical perspective), but with some characters, places and events that tie them together. I liked this approach, although I didn't get just how and when Zeb got a beef with Charlie Gant in the first place (I understand now that he killed his brother, but this wasn't shown anywhere in the film...).

Maybe James Stewart isn't the most believable actor to portray a trapper (John Wayne, who only has a very, very small part here, would have been a better candidate, but he wouldn't have come off right in the romantic part of the role), but the ladies are a pleasure to look at and they and pretty much most of the male actors did their jobs admirably (George Peppard and Richard Widmark especially).

The Cinerama effect, in combination with the many beautiful settings, is really terrific at times, even if here and the fish-eye effect was probably not intended (liked it, though).

This is not the most accurate portrayal of early America for sure, but it will do being just what it is: entertaining for the full duration and with the heart in the right place, with some valid points as well (war isn't funny, the Indians got gypped).

A good 7 out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Awesome - American history on a grand scale
trpdean16 September 2005
As a seven year old boy who adored history, I was brought by my mother to see this in Cinemascope on a huge screen. Anyone who has seen this can just imagine the impact.

There has always been a healthy dispute about what historical developments most influenced the outlook and behavior of Americans. Among the candidates are: i) the development of an entirely new world on distant shores - a world where the rules were there to be made as the Pilgrims/Puritans/Quakers and others determined, ii) the colonists' growing self-identity as Americans, the evolution of that separate identity, and these peoples' coordination and cooperation from 1607 to the Albany Union conference in 1759, the Stamp Act Congress in 1763 and the Second Continental Congress' decision to declare independence in 1776, iii) the workings of a multi-racial society due to the presence of aboriginal people and the importation of slaves, iv) the role of the frontier and settlement of a continually receding West, v) the enormity of immigration and their inter-action with the native-born from about the 1840s to the present, vi) the sheer size and diverse conditions of topography and climate, vii) the evolution of democracy over four centuries on a large scale, viii) the experience of modernization over the past century on a scale unknown to, and before, the rest of the world.

This movie in effect tells the fourth story - and tells it in a thrilling, colorful way -- from the 1840s when the frontier was still the Ohio Valley to about 1885 - not so long a time. (Contrast this with the 169 year colonial period).

The movie is stunning - beautifully cast - music you'll always remember - and many powerful and moving scenes. So many scenes live forever in my mind

  • the return of the George Peppard character from the Civil War to his family's farmstead in Ohio,


-- the astonishing speech by the Richard Widmark character after the buffalo stampede has killed so many,

-- the wonderfully written emotional scenes whenever Debbie Reynolds was dealing with either Robert Preston's clumsy attempt at courtship ("why with hips like yours, having children would be as easy as rolling off a log") or her own love for the roguish Gregory Peck,

-- the George Peppard family (with the wonderful Carolyn Jones and Debbie Reynolds) singing Greensleaves as the movie nears its end,

-- and the astonishing scene of the West transformed into cloverleaf highways and overpasses after we've been watching a deserted West for several hours.

The pride in those who won the West is so evident throughout the movie - yet it's shown along with losses (the deep sadness of Henry Fonda's mountaineer at the continuing encroachment of civilization, the breach of the boundary set in an Indian treaty due to the railroad's need to set a straight course - and the resulting catastrophe).

Not too many years would pass before movie makers would be telling audiences that the settlement of the West was a triumph of vicious villains, charlatans, cynics and fast-buck artists in movies like McCabe and Mrs. Miller, Soldier Blue, Little Big Man, The Wild Bunch.

But I'm deeply grateful that I was old enough to see how the West was won in a movie like this.
111 out of 146 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Outstanding Cast and Crew
Easygoer102 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
(12/2/2019) I believe this was MGM's answer to United Artist's "The Magnificent Seven". This is a stunning cast; so good, you have 2 of the finest directors in Hollywood history co-directing: John Ford and Henry Hathaway. The "uncredited" cast members are brilliant in their own right. People like Lee Van Cleek, Harry Dean Stanton, Bob Morgan (who was almost killed while making this film), Jack Lambert, Roy Jenson, Ken Curtis ("Festus" on "Gunsmoke"), Walter Burke, Paul Bryar, Willis Bouchey and many other actors who had long careers in television and film. The primary cat members have probably 2 dozen Academy Award wins, along with (perhaps) 100 total nominations. Stiill, this film did not suceed as well as one might expect. I think it is because it was so top heavy with great actors, there was simply not enough time to truly use them properly, even though it was nearly 3 hours long (truly epic for those days). Still, the years have been kind to this movie. It is probably the last great western epic, except for Sam Peckinpah's "The Wild Bunch" (1969). This film covers about 50 years, smack in the middle of the 19th Century. Fortunately, this film is on broadcast television tonight (with about 40 minutes of commercials). It shouldn't be cut, with a "G" rating. A must see film.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A whole constellation of magnificent spectacle!
Nazi_Fighter_David21 October 2000
Ford's most distinctive work has dealt with the white American's conquest of the wilderness... He has made films about most of the significant episodes in American history—early colonization of the West, the Civil War, the extermination of the Indians—and in so doing he has recounted the American saga in human terms and made it come alive...

Ford directed one of the episodes of "How the West Was Won," the Civil War... His brief but redeeming contribution effectively recounted the bloody Battle of Shiloh and its aftermath...

Hathaway's strong points were atmosphere, character and authentic locations... He directed, in the film, the episodes of 'The Rivers,' 'The Plains,' and 'The Outlaws.'

George Marshal—the most prolific and most versatile of all major Hollywood filmmakers—directed the episode of 'The Railroad.'

As seen through the eyes of four generations of a pioneer family of New England farmers as they made their way west in the l840s, the scope of "How the West Was Won" is enormous, with essays on the physiology of the West (pioneers, settlers, Indians, outlaws, and adventurers).

The film describes the hard life and times of the Prescott's family across the continent and their fortune to the western shore after years of hardship, loss, love, war, danger and romance...

Stewart appears in the first half hour as a trapper named Linus Rawlings, who marries the daughter (Carroll Baker) of a family migrating West…

The story touched all the bases: runaway wagon trains; Indians stampeding Buffalos; confused and erratic river rapids; the grandeur of Monument Valley, Utah; the rocky mountains; the Black Hills of South Dakota; the clamor of gold in St.Louis; the Cheyenne attack; the Pony Express; the overland telegraph; the coming of the steel roadway of the iron horse; the bloody battle between cattlemen and homesteaders; and some thrilling hand-to-hand fighting…

The result is a stupendous epic Western with 8 Academy Award Nominations including Best Picture and three Academy Awards including Best Original Story and Screenplay; Best Soundand Best Film Editing...

Narrated by Spencer Tracy, "How the West Was Won" enlists the services of such top stars as: Carroll Baker, the strong-minded woman; Gregory Peck, the luckiest gambler; Debbie Reynolds, the perplexing talented singer and dancer; Henry Fonda, the buffalo hunter with gray flowing hair and mustaches; George Peppard, the man with a star; Robert Preston, the decent character with moral flaws; Thelma Ritter, the character woman; Karl Malden, the patriarch; Agnes Moorehead, the unfortunate wife and mother; John Wayne, the major architect of modern warfare; Richard Widmark, the 'king' of the railroad; Russ Tamblyn the Confederate deserter; Andy Levine, the Corporal Ohio volunteer; Lee J. Cobb, the lawman; Carolyn Jones, the worried wife; Eli Wallach, the dangerous outlaw; Rodolfo Acosta, the train robber; Raymond Massey, the great Abraham Lincoln; Walter Brennan and Lee Van Cleef, the thieves to fear…

Alfred Newman and Ken Darby's majestic music takes the pioneers through every conceivable encounter in the West, achieving with conviction a whole constellation of magnificent spectacle...
76 out of 107 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A condensed version of history
justahunch-705496 July 2022
I first saw this when a youngster in Cinerama, which then seemed awesome. I wasn't a particularly big fan of westerns, but they were still a big part of the film industry then and I saw whatever I could. I enjoyed this a lot and later remember seeing a botched version of this Cinerama process on TV and never looked at it again. Well, it's been restored and it is still pretty good entertainment if old fashioned westerns are your thing. This was pretty epic at the time and I recall being thrilled by the train sequence near the end. Obviously, the film's been greatly surpassed in terms of sheer excitement, but was fun to see again with its truly immense cavalcade of famous actors which some will be completely unknown to younger audiences and most are deceased, but that is part of the magic of film. They will be seen by new eyes forever. Despite its long length, this is sort of a Reader's Digest version of this part of American history beginning in 1830 through most of the 19th century. Despite all the famous names there is not one outstanding performance, which is peculiar, but this is a film, from three directors, that does not seem at all interested in actors other than moving pieces for a series of varied scenes throughout history. None are really bad, just routine, though the casting of Carroll Baker and George Peppard as mother and son takes some reality swallowing. The closest thing to a lead here is Debbie Reynolds, the only performer who appears in it throughout, but she, Baker & Peppard all suffer from some awful aging makeup. Reynolds gives it her all, sometimes too much of it, in what seems like an audition for her future Molly Brown. Again, this is fine, rousing old-fashioned entertainment. That Oscar for writing tells you volumes about the era in which this was made.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
HTWWW at the Cinerama Dome in Los Angeles
mrow19 September 2003
It was a good payoff; the print was as perfect as could be expected and the Pacific Cinerama theater is in top form. Seating was fine (it's reserved, so you know ahead where you'll be. Because you're looking at three separate 35mm projections, the sum total of the three result in a very large, clear and bright picture, just as good as a 70mm film, and perhaps better in some respects. The prints were vivid and sharp.

At the Dome, a theater executive came out to discuss the film and the theater history with the audience just prior to the start of the picture; he spoke for 10-15 minutes discussing the pros and cons of the process, why it wasn't practical to continue making films this way etc. One of the plus aspects is that with the small lenses they used, the focus was fixed and any object from 2 ft to infinity was always in focus (therefore, all the scenery was sharp except for certain single-camera and process shots). One of the downside aspects is that extreme closeups are not possible in Cinerama, and he said that the directors hated that. Then he tells inside trivia about the film, how it includes about a minute of footage from two other films (one was The Alamo) because the scenes fit perfectly in the storyline. He also mentioned that back in the 1960's it took 5 people to run the show: three projectors, the 35mm sound projector and one master projectionist - total of 5. The gentleman said that today, with all the modern technological improvements, they were now able to produce the identical result -- with just 5 projectionists! In other words, nothing had changed. Another reason the process could not survive. Got a big laugh. He then introduced each projectionist to the audience.

Anyway, the whole thing came off without a hitch and I had forgotten much of the film's vivid details and incredible scenery, so it was very much like seeing it for the first time. I had not seen it in Cinerama ever, and when I did see a blended 35mm print in a local Edwards theater back in '64, it was somewhat of a disappointment. The magnetic 6-track sound was on still another 35mm film strip, so 4 separate strips are actually required to comprise the presentation). The sound was fine - clear and sharp - with lots of separation in the six channels, but it was not as boomy as the sound we hear in today's pics. For anyone interested in what it might have been like to see a state-of-the-art presentation in the early 1960's, this presents a magnificent opportunity, and the film is a trip. --- DFR
85 out of 122 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This is an entertaining addition to the western genre that's far from perfect but has some worthwhile elements
kevin_robbins25 May 2023
How the West Was Won (1962) is a movie that I recently watched on HBOMAX. The storyline follows a young married couple and their adventure to the west where they plan to settle and start a family. They encounter numerous challenges over time from actually settling, to the gold rush, the Civil War and ultimately the railroad coming through. We watch as the family evolves throughout the various circumstances.

This movie is codirected by John Ford (Stagecoach), Henry Hathaway (True Grit) and George Marshall (Dark Purpose) and stars James Stewart (Rope), John Wayne (True Grit), Gregory Peck (Roman Holiday), Henry Fonda (12 Angry Men), Carroll Baker (Baby Doll), Lee J. Cobb (On the Waterfront) and Carolyn Jones (The Addams Family).

The settings, props, attire and cast for this movie were well put together. The storyline is interesting with some fun circumstances. There is an entertaining rafting scene and magnificently shot cattle and Buffalo stampedes that were entertaining. The acting was inconsistent with some scenes being stiff and rigid causing them to feel less authentic than others; however, the cameos throughout the film were a lot of fun. The family dynamic was easy to root for and well delivered.

Overall, this is an entertaining addition to the western genre that's far from perfect but has some worthwhile elements. I would score this a solid 7/10 and strongly recommend it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Postage Stamp Panorama
slokes9 October 2012
When I was a young boy, I had what I thought was a great idea for a play: Acting out scenes of American history as presented in a book of postage stamps someone had just given me.

Watching this movie several decades later, I was reminded of my youthful idea. If my production had ever seen the light of day, would it have turned out as awkward and tedious as "How The West Was Won"?

Two problems afflict this big production. One, which so many comment on here and elsewhere, is the difficulty of shooting Cinerama in a dramatic presentation, where acting for three different cameras required stock- still acting playing off people whom you couldn't see straight. In shot after shot, one is reminded of the inherent clumsiness of the medium. You may be drawn to watching this film because of its cast of famous names, but seeing them uniformly struggle with stiff body language and sidelong glances at their co-stars will only please those who never cared for Old Hollywood in the first place.

The second, more serious problem circles back to my childhood postage- stamp fantasy: The idea of a movie built not around characters or unifying plot, but rather a series of thinly-connected set-pieces, each showcasing a specific element of white settlement of the American West. That's what is tried here, as HTWWW shows why some stories really are too big for the screen.

Of the five main sequences, four center around key action sequences designed to carry the crux of their stories: a run through the rapids in "The Rivers"; a covered-wagon chase in "The Plains"; a buffalo stampede in "The Railroad"; and a gun battle aboard a chugging train in "The Outlaws." All of these are crammed into the story with minimal explanation or logic, as if the spectacle alone should be enough.

Sometimes it is. This is a fine film for Blu-Ray big screen viewing, as even a gentle shot, say of a canoe being paddled downriver, has a magnetic quality because of the deep-field visual display before you. Henry Hathaway, who directed three of the five segments, does a good enough job you wish he was given license to build up one of his stories into a full-length film of its own, although all five suffer from rote dialogue and cliché scenarios.

The worst sequence, "The Civil War," features the biggest actor in the production and the best-known director. John Wayne and John Ford had quite a history together, too, but none of it is found here. After we are introduced to the battlefield of Shiloh ("After Shiloh, the South never smiled," tired-sounding narrator Spencer Tracy narrates portentously), we see Wayne as General William T. Sherman, second-in-command to Harry Morgan's Ulysses S. Grant (which took some adjusting from this "M*A*S*H" fan). Grant is disappointed with himself and thinks about resigning his command, but Sherman bucks him up with odd logic: "I say a man has the right to resign only if he's wrong, not if he's right!"

The sequence revolves around how a young Confederate deserter (Russ Tamblyn) tries to take a shot at Grant and how a Union soldier with doubts (George Peppard) must step in to save his leader, though it plays haphazard, much like everything else. Peppard and Debbie Reynolds are the major stars of this film, each appearing in three sequences as members of the Prescott line about which the movie is concerned. Debbie does a lot of singing, too, which along with the ever-present Ken Darby Singers on the soundtrack made me flash on Homer Simpson: "They ruined a perfectly serviceable Western with all that fruity singing!"

Carroll Baker is the only other actor to appear in more than one sequence. Of the rest of the cast, Henry Fonda is about as useless and distant a presence as Wayne, while Gregory Peck proves Cinerama wasn't so bad by playing his role as woodenly here as he did in any other movie. Only Karl Malden and Eli Wallach manage a sportive element in their pleasantly hammy performances.

It's not that HTWWW is a bad film, just an awkward one that runs on too long.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Grand Epic
Eric-62-220 August 1999
I'm not a fan of westerns in particular, but this magnificent epic is an exception for me because it has all the wonderful elements of a sprawling historical epic that only Hollywood could do so wonderfully in the 50s and 60s. And yes, I embrace it for holding to a perspective that today's PC revisionists who see evil in everything associated with the rise of America as a great nation are always so quick to condemn. While this is by no means a flawless look at history, it is only those who dare to liken the American pioneers with "Nazis" as one reviewer did who end up "creating history" more than a film like this does.
65 out of 110 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A star-studded visual feast of the West with an epic story to hold it together
jacobs-greenwood11 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This epic Cinerama film begins with a flyover over shot of cloud- shrouded Rocky Mountains; narration is provided by Spencer Tracy throughout, to connect its disparate storyline.

Debbie Reynolds is the only character that survives from beginning to end. She's part of the Prescott family, headed by Karl Malden and Agnes Moorehead, who ventures west after having a tough time of it farming 'rocks' in the east. On their journey – they make it as far as Ohio – the family encounters a rugged individualist fur trapper Linus Rawlings (James Stewart) who's headed back to Pittsburgh to trade his wares and live it up. Oldest daughter Eve (Carroll Baker) falls for him, especially after they're both (separately) accosted by but (together) survive a band of pirates (led by Walter Brennan; Lee Van Cleef appears uncredited).

When Eve's parents die while unsuccessfully navigating the rapids of the river, Linus realizes that he loves her enough to give up his wild-side for farming. Reynolds plays the other Prescott daughter Lily; she sings and dances all the way to San Francisco, eventually.

Along the way, Lily encounters a clumsily romantic wagon-master (Robert Preston), teams up with a would-be pioneer woman (played by Thelma Ritter!), and finally falls for and marries a gambler- opportunist (Gregory Peck). The narrative includes a Civil War segment that features Raymond Massey as Abraham Lincoln (naturally), Henry 'Harry' Morgan as General Ulysses S. Grant and John Wayne as General William Tecumseh Sherman.

This segment begins with George Peppard, playing Eve's oldest boy, leaving home to join his father in the fight and becoming disillusioned about the 'glory' of war. After saving Grant from assassination by a Confederate deserter (Russ Tamblyn), Peppard's character continues west where he encounters a mountain man-buffalo hunter that had been one of his father's friends (Henry Fonda). Reluctantly, the two become involved in helping a hard-driving Union Pacific boss (Richard Widmark) negotiate a ceasefire with the Arapaho Indians in order to allow the transcontinental railway to continue its march westward.

Later, after Peppard's character has married (Carolyn Jones) and begun a family while serving as a lawman, he finally meets his aunt Lily, who'd traveled - after her husband's death and bankruptcy - from Nob Hill to Arizona. But before settling down on their ranch, he has one last score to settle with a train robber (Eli Wallach); Lee J. Cobb and Mickey Shaughnessy play a Marshal and Deputy, respectively.

Nominated for eight Academy Awards including Best Picture, it won three: Editing, Sound and Writing, Story and Screenplay - Written Directly for the Screen (James R. Webb, his only Oscar recognition) and was added to the National Film Registry in 1997. Its Score, which was also nominated, appears at #25 on AFI's Top 25 Film Scores list. It was directed by John Ford, Henry Hathaway and George Marshall.

Watching it again for this review, it's hard to ignore the 'strangeness' of Cinerama's widescreen experience. Even though the film has been significantly improved since I first saw it (the vertical lines of its three screen projection have all but disappeared completely with its remastering) on TCM years ago, the 'hokey' camera setups that the process necessitated – which also made close-ups impossible – were very distracting. Still, many of these visually contrived sequences are stunning AND the new Dolby surround- soundtrack is quite excellent too. Plus, I do highly recommend Cinerama Adventure (2002), the very informative documentary included with this movie's Three-Disc Special & Ultimate Collector's Editions.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed