Battle Beyond the Sun (1959) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Visually Impressive
Steve_Nyland1 February 2007
I'm giving this movie a 5/5 because it's impossible to judge as it exists today.

NEBO ZOYOT is the proper name for a pioneering 1959 movie made in the Soviet Union as an official state-sponsored arts project under the direction of Mikhail Karzhukov & Aleksandr Kozyr. By all accounts it was a breathtaking, visually intimidating project dominated by special effects work the likes of which had not been seen before. Roughly telling the story of a Russian space crew sent to find out the fate of an earlier mission to intercept an alien probe on collision with earth, the movie combined DR. STRANGELOVE anticipating interior sets, functional looking science fiction props & space wear, and miniature model effects that make the George Pal & Captain Video oriented Americanized science fiction of the day look like laughable kitsch. Even the trend-setting science fiction work of Italian director Antonio Margheriti looks klunky and flimsy alongside of what is left of the movie.

There are reports of the original film running over 2 hours, a grand celebration of the forward thinking ideals of Soviet Russia where technology, human ingenuity, and tightly controlled communist propaganda promised a brave new world. Fortunately or not, Roger Corman anticipated the fall of the Eastern Bloc, managed to catch a screening of the film, and was talented enough to realize that nothing of it's like had ever been seen in the west before. Corman wasn't necessarily a "good" filmmaker but he had an eye for talent and bought the North American distribution rights for the film, determined to wow audiences with a science fiction spectacle the likes had never been seen.

Bringing in a young director/editor of promise named Francis Coppola, Corman oversaw a "redefinition" of NEBO ZOVYOT into a standardized American-ish Sci Fi potboiler about an astronaut crew sent into space to do battle with various space monsters. Corman had Coppola jettison half of the film's somewhat ponderous setup depicting the preparation & departure of the alien probe from it's home world -- one of the most visually striking sequences ever filmed -- opting instead for "new" inserted footage depicting the space monsters doing battle on the hull of our heroic space ship.

Sigh ... the result is more than a bit of a mess that manages to water down the impact of the original material, complete with an illogical story arc that is mostly explained in voice-over narration & awkwardly dubbed English dialog concocted from whole cloth and edited in to fit the on screen action (more or less). The monsters are absurd: One looks like a giant disembodied vulva bedecked with a row of razor sharp teeth, and the looped footage of space suit wearing astronauts standing around -- apparently under the influence of 1g gravity -- does little but elicit snickers of laughter from viewers who get enough pure oxygen every day. Somehow he made this movie look stupid.

Yet there are segments where the original Russian made vision shines through: The opening launch sequences have a kind of majesty to them that Gerry Anderson would never be able to quite achieve with his THUNDERBIRDS creations, the interiors of the space ships all look spot on real enough for Mercury program era technology, and the Russian segments of the film have a texture to them that is mesmerizing ... And make the inserted Coppola-made footage seem all the more absurd. Today it seems hard to understand why Mr. Corman would have advocated trying to fix what ain't broke in such a hamfisted manner, but that's 1962 for you, and fortunately the visual power of the surviving Russian segments worked to cement the film with a fervent cult following that allowed even some of it to survive for forty-five years.

Hopefully with a 50th anniversary of the original film soon coming a restoration effort can be made to show the film with only it's original Russian segments & appropriate language subtitles, like has recently been done with FIRST SPACESHIP ON VENUS and Pavel Klushantsev's PLANETA BUR, both of which have turned up on excellent DVDs that show the movies without Mr. Corman's interference. Retromedia shows the film under it's Americanized title BATTLE BEYOND THE SUN on a double movie DVD with the Italian space operetta STAR PILOT, and while contemporary audiences may not "get" the funky 60s approach to science fiction I cannot recommend it highly enough.

5/10
57 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No wonder the Soviets hated America!!!
planktonrules17 July 2008
My giving this a score of 3 is NOT what I would give the original Soviet version of this film. It seems that American-International (a studio that specialized in ultra-low-budget fare in the 60s) bought this film and utterly destroyed it--slicing a two hour plus film into a 64 minute film! Plus, much of this 64 minutes was new material (such as the "monsters")--so you know that this film bears almost no similarity to the original. The original film appears to be a rather straight drama about the Soviet conquest of space--though I really am not sure what it was originally! For insight into the original film, read Steven Nyland's review--it was very helpful.

By the way, this was the third Soviet sci-film I've seen that American-International bought and then hacked apart to make a "new" film--standard practice to a company that was willing to put just about anything on the screen to make a buck--provided, of course, it didn't cost them much more than a buck in the first place!! This Americanized film was about two rival world powers (NOT the US and Soviets) trying to be the first to Mars. The tricky "bad guys" try but fail and the "good guys" rescue one of the idiot astronauts and then head to Mars. Unfortunately, they are temporarily stranded on a moon of Mars where they see some monsters (added by American-International) that are REAAAALLY cheesy and one does bear similarity to a certain part of a female's anatomy. Then, they are rescued--returning to Earth heroes.

The bottom line is that the film was butchered--turning an incredibly beautiful piece of art (for the time) being turned into a grade-C movie. Because of this, the Soviets really had a reason to hate America! I'm just shocked that the horrible job A-I did with this film didn't convince them to refuse to sell more films to these jerks! It's worth a look for a laugh, but the really bad moments that make you laugh are few and far between. So, the film is a dud--not bad enough to make it a must-see for bad movie buffs and too dopey to be taken seriously. I would really love to see this movie in its original form--it must have been some picture.

UPDATE--nietogimenez sent me an email indicating the original IS available and said you can just Google for it.
36 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Another Russian classic ruined by Roger.
BA_Harrison12 April 2013
1997: after a catastrophic atomic war, the Earth has divided into two rival nations, the North Hemis and the South Hemis, both sides locked in a battle to be the first to land on Mars.

Battle Beyond the Sun started life as a state-sponsored Russian sci-fi movie called Nebo Zovyat— a breath-taking, prophetic vision of the Soviet Union's journey into space; in the disrespectful hands of opportunistic producer Roger Corman and a young and eager-to-please Francis Ford Coppola, what was once awe-inspiring becomes laughable, the pair badly dubbing and drastically re-editing the original two hour epic to a mere 64-minutes of clumsy space melodrama (albeit it with impressive effects), 'enhanced' by silly inserts of space monsters that look suspiciously like genitalia.

It's dull going as the two nations race to the 'Red Planet' only to fail with the finishing line in sight, and the feel-good moral of the tale—that rival nations must co-operate if they want to achieve truly great things—does little to compensate for the sheer shoddiness of the whole cut-and-paste approach and the frustrating fact that the wonders of Mars remain unseen.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
fascinating, bizarre...ultimately awful...
jbrotychoorion12 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Saw this long ago late one night on an old UHF (read second-rate) TV channel. Its was another attempt by a cheapo studio to make a quick buck by grafting cheap American footage onto a cheaply purchased Russian sci-fi film , and foisting it onto an unsuspecting American public, probably as the second of a double feature. The plot , which was probably drastically altered from the original Russian film, concerns a space race between two antagonistic regions on Earth, which I believe they referred to as North Hemis and South Hemis. I think the goal was mars , but (SPOILER ALERT) I don't think they make it. One side, probably the Americans in the original, attempt to make it there first in a risky effort and crash on one of Mars' moons (dont ask me which one). The other side rescues them and they all become friends, the message being one of peaceful coexistence in exploration of the stars....Most of the film is a reediting of the original Russian film, and much of that footage is interesting. The lift off and mission control scenes are well handled , and some of the space flight scenes have a 2001-like quality. There definitely was some money spent. The big American contribution is a laughable fight between monsters on the martian moon. One monster looked like a banana, and the other like a tomato. Who knows what they were thinking. Maybe it was to liven up the original film, which apparently was a straight-forward, realistic depiction of a trip to Mars, minus boogy men. All I can think is that Coppola, under the name Thomas Colchart, accepted this assignment to get his foot in the door......
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not a great call
hte-trasme20 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A lot of the other reviews here express a lot of hope for the Russian- language version of this film, an English-dubbed version re-edited by Roger Corman not having apparently been very good. Roger Corman did ruin some good things in his time, but in this case I think having watched the Russian-language version that what he had to work with wasn't much good in the first place.

First off, this film definitely has a state-sponsored message to get across. There were many Soviet films that were just there for art and entertainment, and there were message-delivering films that still managed to do it in some style. This is neither. We have here an imagined version of how the space race will go, with friendly, reasonable cooperative Soviets getting spurned by opportunistic, business-minded Americans more concerned with winning than with safety. Eventually the Americans are won over to the Soviet way, and we end with an exhortation to the younger generation to continue the conquest of space.

This is interesting as a historical curio, though, and that's it. The acting is wooden. Some impressive space visuals don't make up for the fact that there is almost no plot to keep events moving across the short running time, and the characters are so flay that they are almost undifferentiated. It's basically a feature-length promo for the Soviet space program, and it's definitely filmed that way.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not your typical monsters from outer space
dbborroughs11 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The American version of this film concerns a race into space and was assembled by Roger Corman who cut up the original Soviet film and then added some footage of his own. From the looks of things Corman took a ponderous and very serious film about a trip to the stars and made it some what less serious. Certainly the gravity of the performances of the original remain but at the same time introduction of the battling monsters in the final twenty minutes changes everything. Honestly the only real reason to watch this sleep inducing film is the two monsters which battle it out while the astronauts watch. The creatures are nothing if not monstrous to look at and possess forms that are rather unique, namely less than the less than veiled shapes of genitalia. Clearly the filmmakers assigned by Corman were bored and I doubt they really ever thought they'd actually get away with what they did, but there it is on the screen, who monsters locked in a vicious battle thats in actuality a less than subtle commentary of the male female dynamic. I don't think I ever really paid any attention to their shape for the longest time, it wasn't until I had it pointed out to me that the film suddenly became so much more interesting. Unfortunately the monsters are only briefly seen at the end, but in an otherwise somber film, their inclusion is enough to watch the film if you are a monster nut like me.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What was the original about?
Glen_Chapman9 September 2010
I have just posted a synopsis for this film and noted the major differences between the original Soviet production and the American release.

Although reported to be over 2 hours long my fully subtitled version is only 67 minutes.

I suspect that the a lot of the Soviet propaganda supposed to be in the film was removed before the subtitled version came out.

If anyone wants more details of the differences between the two films don't hesitate to contact me.

Also if anyone has a longer subtitled version of the original film I would also love to know how to source it
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Soc. Realism in Space ?
pkpera7 September 2019
First to explain that 'soc. realism' - probably many are not familiar with that term - socialistic realism. Not even younger people living in Eastern European countries. It was little mocking, sarcastic phrase for mostly by governments financed and controlled movies, theater plays, books . Basically it means presenting life in those countries much better than it was, idealizing it, ignoring bad things, displaying people as happy, etc. Well, now, when we saying this now, I must say that Hollywood does same in big part - except one huge difference - they are allowed to present government, CIA and others as bad .

I watched German release, with original sound and English subtitles. Second shortest movie after passenger 57 - some 75 minutes only. But probably because lot of it (Soviet propaganda and like) was removed. Of course, there is still lot of it, subtle propaganda is not removed, at least not completely. Film is done shortly after first successful satellite launching, and Sputnik was shown couple times, second time was way too unrealistic, but such was basically complete movie. I could even barely call this Sci-Fi - there was almost nothing of science, some attempt to make is by laws of physics ... They walked as we walk on Earth in 0 gravity - ah they had magnetic shoes. Space station was actually designed pretty good, was even rotating - but it was never connected with some artificial gravity. And what hurts especially for Russian movie - there was no sign of multi stage rocket technology, invented by otherwise mentioned Ciolkowski .

Plot: there was some way too simplified journey to Mars, actually 2 of it, in spirit of Great Space Race. I don't know how much of it was cut, but don't think that lost much. All it was so naive and of course in reality not possible to perform such rescue mission. OK, this was made in very early stage of space exploring. Still, whole story is so primitive and uninspired that only explanation is that is done by paid people - to make some nice propaganda.

Visual effect are best part - for year 1959, and probably only reason why this was distributed in Western countries - but after some serious cutting and in case of USA v. some added material.

At the end was landing, in really strange way - I wonder how they could make such big mistake. Well, probably there was almost no any use of consultants from space center of Russian cosmic program. And that would be another worst part together with plot.

Rating 2 - only because of effects.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"A life has more value than any goal a man can strive for".
richardchatten21 October 2023
Although bearing the AIP logo and giving the characters all-American names like Craig Matthews and Paul Clinton the credits give the game away by revealing that it's actually a Mosfilm production in characteristically hot colours bought by Roger Corman's Filmgroup who engaged the services of his illustrious protege Francis Ford Coppola (credited as Associate Producer) depicting an international endeavour to colonise Mars; which seemed a far more imminent prospect sixty years ago that it does today, with a couple of monsters thrown in that manage to be both absurd and Freudian in equal measure.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Just Ignore The Monsters
dane-9216 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
From the very beginning, I was impressed with the quality of the special effects in this movie which, I agree with other reviewers, were very good for their time. The obligatory monster scene on the Mars moon is mercifully short...and if you can just hold your nose through that part, the rest of the film is good enough to make you feel you're really up there with them. I liked the message of the film too, even if it wasn't the original intention of the longer communist propaganda flick. I disagree with those who completely pan Battle Beyond the Sun. I thought much of it was convincing sci-fi, and I'd recommend viewers judge it for themselves.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
jingoist schlock
spintongues30 April 2014
Like most soviet films of the period (and I watched the original version), in has no action whatsoever. The plot is stilted as statues at the People's Economy Achievements Exhibition in Moscow, and the story drags its feet to no end. It is a typical tableau vivant aimed at kicking imperialist America one more time, and at showing Russians (but mostly Ukrainians, as the film was done at the infamous Dovzhenko Studios, legendary for its spectacularly bad productions) at their best and foremost.

However, this propaganda poster about how Soviets and Americans tried to prove to each other whose penis extender—pardon me, phallic symbol—is better, racing each other to Mars, of all places, is nicely illustrated with analog FX. The music is abominable, and is in place only in the scene of "space madness" of the one "bad American" they let out into space. The dialogue is absurdist and as ridiculous as the gadgetry shown. More than anything else, it reminds me of the old Chapayev joke: —Pet'ka, the apparatus. —Six, Vasily Ivanovich. —Six what? —Apparatus what? In some sense, it's just as silly as Gravity. Look how much time passed, and what has changed?

Nevertheless, content-wise, the film's narrow-minded positivism and typical soviet jingoism is set off by one truly Pynchonian twist, and you can appreciate it if you read Gravity's Rainbow. The film has its own Gottfried, and there is the Gottfried glorious moment there. A-and Gottfried's name in the film is Grigory.
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Interesting, albeit unsubtle, Soviet space-opera
jamesrupert201412 May 2019
{Note: these comments and score refer to the Russian film 'Nebo Zovyot' ('The Sky Beckons') (1959), NOT the AIP film 'Battle Beyond the Sun' which was pieced together using the Russian special effects (plus a couple of ridiculous monsters)}. The Soviet spaceship "Motherland' is being prepared on a space station for the first journey to Mars when the mission leader Yevgeny Petrovich Kornev (Ivan Pereverzev) gets a call from another team (presumably American but this is not explicit), also planning on going to Mars in their spaceship "The Typhoon", who request access to the space station's facilities. Kornev assures them that the station is 'open to all'. During subsequent conversations, The Typhoon's crew, pilot Robert Clark (Constantine Bartashevich) and publicity man Erwin Verst (Gurgen Tonunt), are very leery about revealing their exact plans and seem flustered when they find out the Soviets are leaving a few days hence. Verst contacts his boss, who orders them to leave immediately, despite the risks, as all that matters is getting to Mars first (in 1959, the real 'space race' was just beginning). The Typhoon breaks station regulations and takes off without authorisation, injuring Motherland crew member Gregory Somov (Valentin Chernyak). The takeoff triggers an orgy of capitalistic marketing, as seen in a montage of Times Square signs proclaiming the success of the "Mars Syndicate" to be the first to reach Mars, plugs for Mars themed cocktails, and real estate ads pushing the sale of cheap Martian land (an unsubtle dig at Western commercialism and blunt counterpoint to Kornev 'knowledge for knowledge's sake' explanation for why the Russians want to go to the red planet). Paying for their recklessness, the crew of the Typhoon soon find themselves low on fuel and drifting toward the sun. They send an SOS to the Russians who, without hesitation, abandon their own Mars trip to rescue their rivals, despite the hazards of the meteor field the Typhoon has entered. The Motherland, with too little fuel to return to Earth or land on Mars, touches down on the tiny asteroid 'Icarus', the orbit of which has taken it near Mars, to await help from Earth. When an unmanned fuel shuttle crashes, all seems lost until Kornev spots a space-suited figure staggering across the asteroid's surface: Somov had heroically taken command of a second shuttle and delivered the necessary fuel. The film opens with a lengthy present day (i.e. 1959) prologue but just ignore the 'just a dream of the future' framing device and watch the film as straight, hard science fiction. The film is a product of its times and its blatant cold war politics (noble Socialists vs. grasping Capitalists) seems trite and dated, but the story is entertaining and the special effects and imagery outstanding (especially the 'Mars-rise' scene on Icarus or the numerous shots of the spaceships and the space station). I watched a sub-titled version, so somethings may have been lost in translation (such as the nature of Somov's fate). Definitely a must-see for space-opera junkies (or fans of Soviet-era cinema). The best of the 'space' scenes can also be seen in the ridiculous AIP opus 'Battle Beyond the Sun', assembled by one of Roger Corman's more famous umpa loompas, Francis Ford Coppola, or the even more dire 'Queen of Blood' (1966), both of which incorporated recycled 'Nebo Zovyot' footage.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
See the Russian version, skip the US cut
daikaiju19543 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Nebo Zovyot (The Sky is Calling) is a 1959 Soviet film about Russia and the US trying to become the first to land on the planet Mars.

The models(Rockets,Space Station)and sets are impressive for late 1959.

The film never made a clean debut in the US, simply dubbed into English as so many Japanese sci-fi films had. This was because the story had pro-communist messages and disparaged America. Being a Soviet film, the messages are all from the other side. The Soviets are cast as the reasonable folks. While the Americans are the reckless and impetuous.

Fun Fact: Roger Corman bought the American rights to the film. He had it edited, dubbed and some new footage added. The result was his oft-maligned Battle Beyond The Sun. Footage from this movie also showed up in a couple of later 60s American B movies.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why Bother To Americanize This One?
Rainey-Dawn12 November 2016
WOW OK fast-forwarding already and the movie just began... this is Francis Ford Coppola & Roger Corman film?!! Originally a (boring) Russian film that is hacked to pieces, re-edited and dubbed over with a few new scenes added. Yet it's so boring already and awful looking I can't bare to watch anymore! What was so good about this original film? From what I can tell from this Americanized and dubbed over version it, the original film, was awful. Why bother to Americanize this?! I'm sorry I just do not find this film appealing at all.

Well I'll chalk this one up to a 50-pack filler film. I acquired it in the Sci-Fi Invasion 50-Pack. Oh well, they can't all be winners.

1/10
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hopes dashed
keith-moyes-656-4814918 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this movie in its UK premier at the National Film Theatre. It is the original Russian version with subtitles. It was 67 minutes long and this seems about right for its slim story. I doubt if the rumours of a two hour version are true.

The print was in decent shape, with only the occasional scratch, but the image quality wasn't great. I don't know if this was due to the mediocre quality of the original film stock, or was simply because this was only a 16mm print.

If you only know of this film from Corman's Battle Beyond the Sun and are anxious to see it in its original form, don't get your hopes up. The special effects and production design are 'state of the art' for 1959 but everything else is quite poor.

The story is very simple but is OK in its general outline.

It starts with a writer being shown around a Soviet space exhibition. He sits down at a desk looking thoughtful and the rest of the movie is his daydream.

An American rocket lands on a Soviet space station on its way to Mars. The Americans learn that the Russians are also planning a Mars mission and are ordered to set off immediately in order to beat them there. In their hurry to take off they accidentally injure a Russian cosmonaut.

Because they have set off before Mars is in the correct position, they run out of fuel. The Russians heroically shelve their own Mars attempt in order to mount a rescue mission. The rescuers encounter a meteor shower that may or may not have some effect on their spaceship. Eventually they pick up the Americans but also run out of fuel. They land on an asteroid called Icarus, for no obvious reason. The Russians then send them an unmanned fuel rocket which crashes on Icarus, also for no obvious reason. A second fuel rocket is sent and does manage to land safely, but one of the Russians dies (you guessed it) for no obvious reason.

This all sounds fair enough, but the movie makers had only the most elementary idea of how to tell a story in cinematic terms.

The screenplay is very lumpy. It lingers on scenes of marginal importance (and interest) and then omits crucial scenes altogether, so the story jerks forward with scant regard for either temporal or spatial continuity. Basic information, needed to follow what is actually happening on the screen, is given in the wrong place or is too cryptic to really make sense (poor sub titles didn't help). Scenes frequently begin without any preparation and it is only half-way through that anyone bothers to explain what is going on. Sometimes they never do and the visuals are too opaque to fill in the gaps.

The director is more concerned with creating beautifully composed images than generating atmosphere and tension - or even just telling the story. Scenes begin with pointless lingering close ups of people looking thoughtful. Sometimes we learn what they were thinking and sometimes not. They then wander aimlessly around the (often superb) sets with no point or purpose before clustering together and striking poses that might look good in stills but make no dramatic sense. The actors are left to fend for themselves.

In Hollywood it has often been said that when a good director dies he becomes a cinematographer. If Mikhail Karzhukov was ever a good director he must have been dead long before this movie was made.

The overall impression is that Nebo Zovyot is not a narrative movie so much as a series of 'tableau vivants'. It resembles an early silent movie, where the inter titles explain what is going on and the subsequent scenes are merely illustrations - except that here there are no inter titles.

Interestingly, the other East European SF films made around this time which I have now seen in their original versions, Mechte Navstrechu, Planeta Burg, Der Schwiegende Stern and Ikarie-XB1, are all more or less the same. This suggests that Soviet Bloc film makers were working in a bubble with very little access to movies made elsewhere. Stylistically, they were all stuck in the Silent era, when Soviet film-making had been cutting edge.

I know some people might accuse me of being culturally blinkered: trying to impose Western story-telling conventions on a film made in a different cinematic tradition, with different aesthetic values and artistic priorities. I have considered this possibility.

They are wrong.

PS: Many aspects of this review are even more pertinent to Mechte Navstrechu, the other SF film premiered in this NFT season.

PPS: The British Film Institute is currently negotiating with a Danish company to release these old Soviet era SF films on DVD (hopefully with full digital restoration) so many other people will be able to judge them for themselves.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Coppola and Corman combine to not so great effect
Red-Barracuda5 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Battle Beyond the Sun was a sci-fi adventure that was created by Roger Corman's American International Pictures when they edited a Soviet sci-fi film into something friendly to the American drive-in. Seemingly, the Russian original was quite sober and serious-minded, while it referenced the cold war and portrayed the Soviets as fair-minded and reasonable and the Americans as underhand idiots. AIP figured that this very un-American message wouldn't translate into dollars, so they re-wrote it changing the super-powers into fictional states known as the North Hemis and the South Hemis. They also removed much of the more serious material and added some alien monsters to liven things up. What remains is that the two competing states are in a space race to be the first to land on Mars. I can't comment on the original version as I have never seen it but this version isn't too good. The story seems – perhaps unsurprisingly given its genesis – a bit muddled. It's not really helped by the fact that given this is a story about a journey to Mars; they don't actually ever get there!

But perhaps the thing that stands out the most about this one is the fact that this cut was helmed by Francis Ford Coppola (under the pseudonym Thomas Colchart). In fairness, there are no signs of Coppola's massive talent here. This was clearly very much a work experience gig for him. The best aspects of the whole thing come from things from the production values of the original movie. There is decent model and set design here. But on the whole, it's a pretty lacking film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Seen on Pittsburgh's Chiller Theater in 1965
kevinolzak31 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The early 60s found Roger Corman's Filmgroup looking for foreign titles for easy purchase, one such entry a 1959 Russian feature called "Nebo Zovyot" (The Sky Calls), entrusted to a young Francis Ford Coppola to shoot some new footage to support the impressive visual design, issued on a theatrical double bill with Curtis Harrington's "Night Tide." The original 73 minute picture centered on competition between America and the Soviets in the race to conquer Mars in 1997, as a single brave cosmonaut risks his life to save the US team from certain death. Coppola eliminated the politics, redubbed all the characters with American sounding names, and added (with an assist from Jack Hill) the Corman-required monsters closely resembling male and female genitalia (well, female anyway) that gained such notoriety on release as the 64 minute "Battle Beyond the Sun," 9 minutes less than the Russian version. "Nebo Zovyot" enjoys a stylish look which remains intact in color, but the stodgy outline about the rescue of two astronauts from being drawn toward the sun and the lack of fuel to make it to Mars also survives, simply changing the warring factions into opposite sides of the equator, North Hemis representing the Soviets, South Hemis the mishap-prone Americans. The Coppola-shot footage adds up to only two minutes (the reason for the poster, Thomas Colchart pseudonymously credited as producer/director), not worth the lengthy wait for the orbiting asteroid landing at 42 minutes, one brief look at each creature before the gory bout takes place at 53 minutes, it's pretty much a standard dubbing job. After this proved a mild success, the producer gave Coppola the go ahead to write and direct his own opus on location in Ireland, "Dementia 13," while Roger himself was busy doing "The Young Racers," with many of the same actors (FFC also took part in the drawn out shooting of "The Terror"). Corman's later endeavors along similar lines utilized Jack Hill, Stephanie Rothman, Curtis Harrington, and Peter Bogdanovich on titles like "Voyage to the Prehistoric Planet," "Planet of Blood," "Track of the Vampire," and "Voyage to the Planet of Prehistoric Women" ("Planeta Bur," "Mechte Navstrechu," and "Operacija Ticijan" pillaged for footage), all of which at least benefit from the presence of recognizable actors such as Basil Rathbone or William Campbell.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I thought that men came from Mars and women came from Venus....
mark.waltz1 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Then why the bizarre looking monster on one of Mars moons? I wouldn't spoil the surprise of what this creature looks like, but it is very obvious and a truly hairy situation. The American version of this alleged Russian science fiction gem is certainly an eye-opener. It's another one of those American International releases that actually had been made by somebody else, pull apart and recreated, making a stew that no audience probably wanted to even stick their fork in. In this case, the original creators came from Russia, and technically speaking, this film has some extremely beautiful sequences that are imaginative in scope, but covered up with American dialogue and a story that makes no sense, and most of all a conclusion that seems to go on far too long even in the film's 67 minutes running time.

Of course they changed the names of the characters, and the spaceship commander's wife is humorously named Ruth Gordon. It's too bad that American international didn't get someone with half of her talent to dub the lines because they sound so ridiculously lame, and the voices simply don't go with the characterizations. The film itself is basically a moving painting, as if someone had taken their brush, created what they thought the outer stratosphere look like and fell into it just like Mary Poppins and her charges did a few years later.

If the original story in the original film is as beautiful as the photography, then this must have been a sight to behold. It is almost an outer space version of Dante's inferno where nightmarish figures becomes beautiful (with the exception of the monster), hiding the fact that the dangers the astronauts face are immense. americanizing this was a political slap in the face to Russia at the time, but being a lowly studio like American International, I'm sure was barely even acknowledged. This is worth a one-time viewing for its visuals only, and giving true credit where the true credit was due.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bleached Out Mess
Hitchcoc19 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The premise is OK. The Earth has managed to stay afloat despite terrible trials. Two adversarial forces have designs on Mars. The movie is talky and dull. The movie has no pacing and is dull. The science is unclear and dull. There is pointless stuff going on and it is dull. The butchering of the original led to incredible dullness. The special effects were quite dull. The scene at the end with all the "heroes" coming in on speedboats was almost embarrassing. You'd swear it was a half hour before the Academy Awards. Don't bother with this blather. Apparently, some of Hollywood's great minds got together to produce this sludge. If I didn't mention it, it was dull.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dry and then cheesy
Leofwine_draca13 November 2023
BATTLE BEYOND THE SUN is a thinking man's science fiction movie for the first half, and if you notice that the voices don't match the words in the English version then that's because this is a Russian movie that's been dubbed and edited for American audiences by Roger Corman, no less. The story tells of mankind's race to send a spaceship to Mars, and it's very dry and talky, as you'd expect from a pseudo scientific script like this one. The latter half has more fun with the inclusion of some cheesy monsters that might well have inspired none other than H. R. Giger, but as a whole it's not very entertaining.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Sky Calls (Nebo Zovyot)
trimbolicelia12 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Fair but dull late '50s color Russian-made, English-subtitled sci-fi. Has a fair amount of typical for the era pro-Russian propaganda and derisive depiction of the American way of life. Russian scientists and cosmonauts plan a trip to Mars but in the meantime rescue and aid a pair of US astronauts. When the Americans learn of the Russian plan, (it's no secret) they are ordered by their superiors to head to the Red Planet first, even though they're ill-prepared. Of course the Russians have to save the astronauts bacon yet again and end up on one of Mars's satellites. The Mars plan is kaput and now everyone has to figure out a way to return to Earth. Some nice visuals and the Mars rise effect as seen from the satellite is impressive. The slog through the story is dull though. Not much exciting action here. Roger Corman got his mitts on this film and added dubbing and some added scenes, including a pair of rather grody monsters, and named it Battle Beyond the Sun. Catch that if you can. The quality of this, the Video Dimensions DVD of The Sky Calls is very good. The color is great and the picture is clear. Recommended for fans of un-embellished Russian imports.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
4/10 not 8/10* For good and for bad, another AIP cannibalised Soviet science-fiction film
jamesrupert201411 April 2019
{Note: these comments and score refer to the AIP film 'Battle Beyond the Sun', NOT the Russian film 'Nebo Zovyot}'. American International Pictures bought the rights to 'Nebo Zovyot' ('The Sky Beckons') (1959), a Russian 'hard' science fiction film about a cold-war race to land the first manned spaceship Mars. Although a bit plodding, 'Nebo Zovyot' is an interesting film with excellent special effects (the scenes of the cosmonauts standing on the asteroid Icarus with Mars looming above them is especially memorable). Despite the project being handed off to a young Francis Ford Coppola (a film student at the time), the Americanised version is just a bargain-basement mix of time-filling introductory voiceover, bad dubbing, and sloppy editing (note the crude mask covering the "CCCP" on one of the spaceships, note also that they missed the Red Star on the tailfin). Oddly, all of the names in the credits have been changed to fictional 'western' names and only the "Mosfilm" credit suggests the movie's actual origins. The film, which originally depicted Americans vs Soviets, has been depoliticised (the spaceships now represent fictional Northern hemisphere and Southern hemisphere political rivals) and the only new footage is a laughable monster fight on one of the Martian moons (referred to as a moon of Mars in the dubbing but called "Ikar", because in the Russian original, they landed on the asteroid Ikar (Icarus)). Apparently Coppola's boss, the legendary Roger Corman, decided that the original scene, in which a cosmonaut stranded on the tiny moon looks up a hill and sees his rescuers, would be better if instead he saw monsters, so we're treated to a headless creature with protruding eye-stalks eyes battling a menacing-looking 'vag-dentata' beast. Such juvenile additions seem ridiculous in retrospect but no one can question as to whether Corman knew his audiences and if it wasn't for his unerring eye for talent (and profits), few people in the cold-war era 'west' (especially in the USA) would have had any opportunity to see some of the great work being done by filmmakers behind the Iron Curtain. As a stand-alone film, 'Battle Beyond the Sun' is hard to rate: the Russian special effects are great (I would give 'Nebo Zovyot' an 8/10) and, while the AIP version is awful (independent of its Russian visuals), it remains an interesting example of Corman's chutzpah, and, if you didn't know the provenance of the special effects, you'd likely think that 'Battle Beyond the Sun' was a well-made and pretty cool '60s science fiction movie. *there is only a single IMDB entry for the film and I don't seem to be able to rate the Russian (8/10) and the American (4/10) versions separately.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"We may never know the answer"
hwg1957-102-26570419 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Watched the American re-dubbed version of this Soviet Union film under the title of 'Battle Beyond The Sun' from 1962. The movie has the world divided into two conglomerates, the Nothern Hemis and the Southern Hemis. Each Hemis sends a mission to Mars but after many incidents no one reaches the red planet. In the end each Hemis decide they will try again but this time in co-operation with each other. Which is a nice ending, a negative leading to a positive. Being (not well) dubbed one can't gauge the performances of the original Russian actors but it looks very good with lots of blues and reds giving atmosphere to the sets and costumes. It would be good to see the original in a good print in the Russian language with subtitles.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Garbage in, garbage out
lor_2 January 2024
One of my sci-fi/horror/fantasy reviews written 50 years ago: Directed by M. Karzukov and Aleksandr Kozyr (reworked version by Francis Ford Coppola); Produced by Tatyana Kulchitskaya for Dovzhenko Film Studios (reworked version by Roger Corman, released in America by American-International Pictures. Photography by N. Kulchiskiy; Music by Yuli Meitus (reworked version by Carmine Coppola). Starring Ivan Pereverzev and Alla Popova; plus voices by Andy Stewart and Aria Powell.

Another waste of a foreign sci-fi film (from Russia), chopped up, dubbed and voice-over narrated to no avail. Beginning with a boring prologue expressing the authors' inflated view of the film's historical importance, this set in 1997 tale of the race of Earth's two powers (North and South hemis) to claim Mars is virtually devoid of continuity or interesting stuff. Nothing really happens, and just to punch up the action, a foolish fight between a giant insect creature and a headless hulk with eyestalks is inserted amidst otherwise straight science fiction.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
In faded colour.
plan9922 October 2023
In colour but it's faded a bit over the decades. A more fitting title would have been "Very Brief Encounter Beyond The Sun" but this would have been much less appealing to potential film goers.

Much more a morality tale than an action film so don't expect ray guns being fired all over the place as it just plods along but the space ships travelled vast distances very quickly.

Very well made especially for the time in Russia but it was a propaganda film, a plump over 50s female scientist would never had made it into a USA film as they would also have been a love interest for the hero, no such carrying on in Russia of course.

Great curiosity value and worth watching.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed