Tarantula (1955) Poster

(1955)

User Reviews

Review this title
136 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Surprisingly Good Sci-Fi
claudio_carvalho24 July 2012
In Desert Rock, Arizona, a disfigured man is found dead and identified by Professor Gerald Deemer (Leo G. Carroll) as his assistant and friend Dr. Eric Jacobs, who would suffer from acromegalia. The country doctor Matt Hastings (John Agar) is puzzled with the mysterious disease and decides to investigate further about acromegalia. Professor Deemer omits that Dr. Eric Jacobs and Dr. Paul Lund were researching with him a nutrient to increase the food supply in the world and they have been affected by the experiment. Soon Paul Lund, who has also been affected and is mad, breaks and sets the laboratory on fire and a huge tarantula escapes.

Meanwhile, the gorgeous Stephanie "Steve" Clayton (Mara Corday) arrives in town to work with Dr. Jacobs, and Dr. Hastings drives her to Professor Deemer's house in the desert. She is hired by Deemer and she finds that he is sick. When cattle bones are found in a farm, Hastings collects material and flies to a laboratory, where he learns that the sample is of tarantula's venom. But the scientist does not believe that one tarantula could ever produce such quantity of venom. The doctor returns to Desert Rock sure that the species is part of Prof. Deemer's experiment and the locals are threatened by the dangerous tarantula.

"Tarantula" is a typical sci-fi of the 50's and a surprisingly good film. The screenplay is very well written and the movie is supported by good direction, performances, cinematography and special effects. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Tarântula!" ("Tarantula!")

Note: On 16 Sep 2018 I saw this film again.
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fun monster movie with serious undercurrent...
moonspinner5515 October 2006
Ostensibly a quickie b-flick targeted at matinée audiences, "Tarantula" certainly isn't High Art but it does take a refreshingly serious tack on its story. Mad scientist in small desert town experiments with growth serum, accidentally unleashing one humongous spider on the terrified locals. Very nice atmosphere, decent special effects, not-bad performances. John Agar is the stalwart hero, and of course he's coupled with a pretty girl prone to screaming (Mara Corday as Stephanie, whom Agar affectionately calls 'Steve'). Probably more fun today for nostalgic adults than modern preteens, and certainly not as gripping as "Them!", but still a well-enough produced creep-show. Look fast for Clint Eastwood in an uncredited bit. ** from ****
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Above Average Example of the Genre.
rmax30482321 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Professor Deemer (Leo G. Carrol) and two of his colleagues have holed up in a lab out in the desert where they are experimenting with a new non-organic nutrient that will feed the world as its population explodes. The experiment goes awry -- don't they all? -- and Deemer's colleagues both contract a fulminating pituitary disorder, acromegalia, that distorts their features and then kills them. Before he dies, enraged, one of the colleagues gives the unconscious Professor Deemer a shot of his own medicine.

When the corpses begin to show up, the small-town doctor, John Agar, is prompted to visit the lab out of curiosity. It is about this same time that Carrol's beautiful young assistant, Mara Corday, arrives. The young doc and the lab assistant fall for each other.

This nutrient -- I hope you're following this -- this nutrient promotes dramatic growth in organisms. In one day a baby rat is the size of a bunny rabbit. Imagine what this will do for the world's cattle supply! One cow would fill up the barn and eat nothing but this non-organic nutrient fluid! Oh, by the way, the professor's prediction about population growth was a little off the mark. He predicted that by 2000 the planet would be host to something more than three and a half billion people. It's now 2007 and we are just shy of six billion. The best estimate is that in another 50 years we'll have doubled that figure. Someone place a long-distance call to Thomas Malthus and tell him he was right after all.

Well, see, most of the experimental organisms were destroyed in a fire, but one managed to escape. It could have been a guinea pig but if it had, there would be no picture. No -- it was a tarantula the size of a foot stool. The wretched thing hobbles about secretly in the desert, making a nuisance of itself by eating cattle, horses, and people. Before you know it -- and, more important, before Agar, Corday, the local sheriff, and the US Air Force know it, the spider is the size of Shea Stadium and is crunching whole houses beneath it. (The now gruesomely disfigured professor is hoist by his own petard.) Tommy guns don't stop it. It doesn't even pause when a load of dynamite is exploded under its cephalothorax.

Only an infallible super hero could save us now. And here he comes. Clint Eastwood, leading a pack of jets, demolishes the lumbering creature just as it is about to attack the town of Desert Rock. Well, we knew Mara Corday would survive anyway, because she was later to appear in "Sudden Impact" with Clint, many years later, as a waitress.

The movie is made on a low budget and it has no ambitions beyond inspiring fear and wonder at the special effects, which look a bit shoddy to today's audiences used to CGIs. It has no lesson to teach us, unlike, say, "The Day the Earth Stood Still," but its very cheesiness lends it a charm that's lacking in multimillion-dollar f/x extravaganzas like "The War of the Worlds." It's comforting to see a small-town doctor who makes house calls. The vistas of empty desert enchant the eye. And if the characters are stereotypical, well, stereotypes exist for a reason. They are fixed points in a changing and unpredictable universe. We sort of like our doctors to be humanists and one of the crowd, and we like our professors thoughtful and quirky, and the sheriff hard-headed, realistic, and given to derisive laughter when he hears an implausible tale.

There's a scene in which John Agar and Mara Corday are driving in the doc's nifty 1950s Ford convertible through the empty desert, and he shares with her his sense of awe at living in a landscape like this. Everything that has ever walked or crawled has left its mark in this desert. . . . She asks him to pull over and stop. They sit on a rock and chat in the middle of this vast void. The scene only lasts a few minutes, but for those few minutes we could wish we were part of that couple, innocent, capable of inspiration, still able to look at emptiness and recognize beauty in it. My guess is that the location for this scene is now part of a strip mall and the vacant lots sparkle with bent soda cans and styrofoam. Would that we were at three and a half billion and there were room enough left for wonder at a natural landscape.

It's a simple, unpretentious movie made for adults as well as kids. You'll enjoy it.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Classic example of a 1950s science runs amuck movie.
ChuckStraub21 September 2004
Tarantula is a classic example of a 1950s science runs amuck movie. It's a fairly simple movie and plot with all the characteristics of a sci fi, horror movie from the 50s. Nothing very special or unique about it but the film is still a lot of fun to watch. It's has the excitement and dramatic scenes that would have made this a great drive in movie or late night show. As long as you don't take things too seriously, just sit back and relax, it can be a nice reminder of the past that is still interesting to todays viewer. If you liked watching other sci fi, horror movies made in the early to mid 50s, you will also enjoy this one. I don't think you will be disappointed.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tarantula: First Impressions
Hitchcoc19 March 1999
I was eight when I saw Tarantula on the not-so-big screen. My youthful fear of death led me to a greater concern for the disease caused by the "nutrient" than by a very large spider. It contains a classic moment found in many 50's big monster "movies." Two guys are left behind in a car (which, of course, is in bad need of a tune-up and won't start) with a couple of puny rifles. They, of course, provide an evening meal for the spider. This was probably most people's first exposure to napalm as well.
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not as good as "Them!", but if you liked "Them!" you'll probably like this one
lemon_magic7 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
"Tarantula" is obviously an attempt by Universal to cash in on the commercial success of "Them!"...or maybe the "giant insect runs amok" movie was an idea whose time had come. Anyway, the design sense isn't in the same league as "Them!", and the cast isn't as strong, but to its credit "Taratula!" has enough original elements to stand as a solid bit of sci-fi monster movie making.

It seems to me that John Agar was better in this movie than he was in his previous role in "Revenge Of the Creature". I don't for a moment think that a "Ken Doll" actor type like Agar is believable in the role of a small town country doctor...but he's just sharper and more human somehow. Maybe it was the director, maybe it was the nature of his part. Nestor Paiva (another "Creature" and "Mole People" alumnus) surprised me with his part as an American country sheriff - I didn't expect the level of energy he put into his lines and how well he moved from Latino accent to western American boom. And Leo Caroll was the Gene Hackman of his day. You're not sure why you find him so interesting, you just do. His characters are almost always diffident and utterly civilized, but he improves any scene he is in somehow with his utter class, even when he's acting behind a big rubber mask.

The story is pretty decent, though the structure is a little weird. As Bill Warren points out, Universal seemed to hate incorporating flashbacks in the movies they made at the time, and so the sequence of events seems a little odd and less compelling than it ought to be. The struggle and fire in the lab seems to come too soon, and really should have been shown as a flashback.

Another problem: the arachnid is simply too big to be really compelling - it seems to me that it should have been the size of, say, a semi truck, not the size of an office building. Bigger is not necessarily scarier. "Them" creeped the viewer out with dozens of bus-sized ants, not one ant the size of King King.

The biggest problem is actually in the ending - four Air Force jets shows up and napalm the beast from the air, and the movie just stops dead with the creature's destruction.Rather than the epic feel of "Them", the ending feels more like a Warner Brother's "Roadrunner" cartoon.

Still, there are lots of things to enjoy about this one.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I hate spiders, but I like Tarantula.
BA_Harrison21 April 2016
The archetypal '50s big bug movie, Tarantula sees a rapidly growing spider—the result of an experiment involving nutrients and radioactive isotopes—escaping from a laboratory to crawl around the countryside devouring cattle and the occasional rancher. Eventually, the eight-legged horror reaches such massive proportions that the air-force is called in to prevent it from trashing the town of Desert Rock.

John Agar plays town doctor Matt Hastings, the first to suspect that it is an over-sized arachnid that is causing the trouble; Mara Corday is Hastings' love interest, beautiful lab assistant Stephanie 'Steve' Clayton; Leo G. Carroll is over a barrel as Professor Gerald Deemer, who winds up hideously disfigured by his own experiment; and Clint Eastwood saves the day as a plucky U.S. fighter pilot, his face mostly hidden behind a breathing mask, although his squint is unmistakable.

Matters get very silly at times, especially with the humongous, hairy spider somehow managing to wander around the desert unseen (at one point, it peers into Mara's bedroom, the woman blissfully unaware of the huge eyes and mandibles at her window), but the hokey nature of the plot only adds to the overall enjoyment. Excellent special effects (for the day) and solid performances also go to qualify Tarantula as a must-see sci-fi/horror classic.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A sci-fi classic!
rosscinema13 August 2002
I watched this movie a hundred times while growing up and I've seen it at least a hundred more times as an adult! Great story. To me it's the greatest big bug movie ever made. Interesting side story of the effects of the nutrient on humans, also. I fell in love with Mara Corday after the first time I saw this as a young child and I still think she was one of the great beauties of the screen. I think the main reason the film holds up today is the special effects are still quite impressive and there is nothing that todays audience would find hokey or cheesy. The only thing that "Bugs" me is the sound effect of the tarantula growling as it attacks. But thats just nit-picking. Its also fun spotting a young Clint Eastwood. Great sci-fi and great entertainment! A film viewing must!
73 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun and charming giant bug movie
tomgillespie20023 December 2016
One of countless 'big bug' features to come out of the U.S. during the 1950s, Jack Arnold's Tarantula is one of the most enjoyable of its kind. After Gordon Douglas' Them! really kicked off the fad in the previous year, Tarantula has everything audiences came to love about the genre; a dusty, middle-of-nowhere Arizona setting, the handsome yet charisma-free hero, the screeching love interest, the shady doctor who certainly knows far more than he is letting on, and, of course, the giant, 'terrifying' monster. What makes this film slightly more interesting than others of its ilk is the fact that it doesn't blame radiation on the deformed beast, but actually attempts to tell a story.

After renowned biological research scientist Eric Jacobs (Eddie Parker) is found dead in the desert, apparently suffering from a rapid form of acromegaly, Dr. Matt Hastings (John Agar) is called in from a nearby town to investigate. When Hastings suggests an autopsy to figure out what brought on such a rare disease and how it killed Jacobs so quickly, Dr. Gerald Deemer (Leo G. Carroll), one of Jacobs' colleagues, refuses his request and signs the death certificate himself. Back at Deemer's isolated desert research lab, it is revealed that the doctor has been experimenting on animals in a bid to save the future planet's food shortage, and has increased the size of a number of his subjects, including a tarantula. After a fire destroys Deemer's lab, the Arizona landscape is soon overshadowed by the giant, hungry arachnid.

While a radioactive isotope does crop up at one point, the 50 foot spider is purely the handiwork of a scientist with good intentions rather than government nuclear tests, and therefore Tarantula creates an interesting and conflicted character in Caroll's Deemer. Caroll certainly chews every scene, but proves a far more appealing male lead than the bland Agar. Yet the real star of Tarantula is the creature itself. The combination of matte effects and the use of a real spider, which would later be used on The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957) have aged spectacularly well, only failing to convince during the brief close-up shots of the last thing a few poor (and seemingly blind) souls see before they're gobbled up. While the climax is over before you know it, there's fun to be had in trying to spot a young and uncredited Clint Eastwood as a fighter pilot. It's no longer scary (was it ever?), but it has charm by the bucket load.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The second best 1950's big bug movie !
monkeys-46 December 2004
This one has a special place in my memories ! I grew up in New Mexico near the desert, and whenever they showed this one on the late night science fiction Saturday night TV thriller show, I was afraid to walk to school and back on Monday! As I have grown up over the last forty years, I have come to appreciate it as a well crafted science fiction near classic! Jack Arnold directed many good sci-fi movies in the 1950's, but there is no doubt this was the creepiest! Next to the superior "THEM", released the year before (at a different studio), this UNIVERSAL STUDIOS chiller was , for my money, the second best of the giant bug movies of that decade! You will never look at the desert the same way again. Actress MARA CORDAY impressed me so much in this one, that I named one of my daughters after her! JOHN AGAR gave a great performance, and this one led to him doing a string of more horror and sci-fi movies for the next decade or two! It helped that they used a real Tarantula (named TOMORROW), instead of a fake one, and Clifford Stine's special effects will convince you that spider is really 100 feet tall! Another plus is Henry Mancini wrote some of the music score! So, I recommend this one to all those that hate creepy crawlers of any kind! Get out the can of RAID! But, you had better make it a really big can !!!

Signed, Baron Beast
54 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of Universal's finest.
chris_gaskin12324 January 2002
After Creature From the Black Lagoon, this is the best of Universal's monster movies of the 1950's, and the best giant bug movie of the 1950's after Them!

The movie includes haunting desert locations and good special effects. The giant tarantula especially looks impressive. Good performances from the cast which includes British actor Leo J Carroll (The Man From U.N.C.L.E.), who was responsible for the tarantula to grow so huge. A young Clint Eastwood is responsible for the tarantula's death.

If you are a fan of giant bug movies like me, this is a must.

Rating: 4 and a half stars out of 5.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Prof. Deemer would have to work a LOT harder nowadays
lee_eisenberg23 January 2012
Jack Arnold's "Tarantula" is mostly your typical '50s sci-fi flick, this time focusing on a typical member of the family Theraphosidae* whom a scientist is using as a test subject in a series of experiments aimed at increasing the world's food supply: the experiments involve making animals grow really quickly. Sure enough, the arachnid gets loose, and so there's an eight-legged, 100-foot killing machine stomping through the desert, devouring anyone in its way.

The professor mentions that the world population was growing by about 25 million every year. Nowadays it's closer to 80 million every year (about the population of Egypt or Germany). The professor predicted a world population of 3.6 billion in the year 2000, while in reality it reached 6 billion the previous year, and reached 7 billion last year. It's predicted to be 9 billion by 2050. Meanwhile, resources are drying up. The professor would have to work a lot harder nowadays (preferably without releasing a giant spider).

OK, too much analysis. It's mostly the usual, fun sci-fi/horror flick from the era. Starring John Agar (Shirley Temple's first husband), Mara Corday (the October 1958 Playboy centerfold), Leo G. Carroll (Mr. Waverly on "The Man from U.N.C.L.E."), Raymond Bailey (Mr. Drysdale on "The Beverly Hillbillies") and an uncredited Clint Eastwood.

*That's the taxonomic family to which tarantulas belong.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not bad for the era of its release
biker455 May 2002
I have seen this film many times over the years since it was released, including its first theatrical run in 1955. Overall, it is above average for its genre and for the period in which it was made. The acting is passable, the story moves along well, and the effects are better than most of the schlock science fiction that was being churned out during the mid-1950's, although nowhere near the caliber of FORBIDDEN PLANET or THIS ISLAND, EARTH. (Note: Fans of the latter will notice reuse of some of the sound track music themes from THIS ISLAND, EARTH, produced by the same studio a year earlier.)

***SPOILERS AHEAD***

The basis of the plot involves the efforts of two scientists to develop a growth "nutrient" using radioactive isotopes. The stated purpose of this effort is to increase the growth of food sources to supply the booming human population forecast for the future. The "nutrient" formula is very unstable, and produces unpredictable results when injected into experimental animals. Sometimes they grow at an astonishing rate, and sometimes they die. Successful giant animal subjects are being kept in cages in the laboratory.

We now encounter the most major flaw in the plot. The scientists plan to test the formula on human subjects. One of them injects himself with the "nutrient", and quickly becomes the monstrosity seen (in flashback)staggering through the desert and expiring at the opening of the film. What could be the purpose of such an experiment? To make humans grow larger? Doesn't this contradict the whole idea of increasing the food supply to feed an exploding world population?

Before his demise, the doomed scientist from the opening sequence has returned to the lab, attacked his partner (Leo G. Carroll), and injected him with a dose of the "nutrient". During their struggle, a fire is started in the lab (due to the shorting of a huge, unprotected electrical panel, this being a very unlikely and dangerous oversight on the part of the lab's builders) and many of the experimental animals perish or escape (including the tarantula of the films title).

A very attractive woman (portrayed by science fiction mainstay Mara Corday) has been hired as a lab assistant, and arrives by bus in the small desert town. She has no means of transportation to the remote lab, and is offered a ride by the town's physician (John Agar). She introduces herself as "Stephanie", but immediately states that her nickname is "Steve". (Note: This renaming of female characters using male nicknames was a curious and inexplicable practice in 1950's films, and was seen in many other films of the era. Could this have been the precursor of so many male-named women in the present day? But I digress...).

Once she assumes her duties at the lab, "Steve" is instructed in the method of preparing the "nutrient" formula. There is another glaring flaw in the plot at this point. Since they are dealing with a dangerous radioactive substance, the scientist and assistant don protective gear (face masks and gloves), and the formula is prepared inside a shielded enclosure using remotely operated manipulators. A hypodermic syringe is filled with the substance using the same method. Then, unbelievably, the scientist opens a door in the enclosure, reaches in with his bare hand, picks up the hypodermic and carries it around (with an unprotected needle!) as if it were filled with tap water! Certainly, if the mixture were that hazardous, it would not be suitable for use on test subjects, and would be treated with much greater concern for safety in the lab.

Meanwhile, out in the desert, the escaped tarantula continues to grow, and begins to attack area ranches in search of food. It devours several cattle and horses, and one of the ranchers as well. It leaves behind puddles of a white liquid, and this provides the vital clue to the local doctor and sheriff who are attempting to discover the source of the attacks. In another very implausible scene, the doctor (upon discovering a puddle of the liquid) sticks his bare finger into the unknown substance, smells it and then tastes it! One would think that a medical doctor with scientific training would be more cautious than to ingest something he finds in the middle of a pasture! He takes a sample of the liquid for analysis, and it is determined to be spider venom.

The local constabulary is alerted, and soon comes face to face with the now gigantic spider, which is rampaging through the countryside eating everything it can catch (including the unfortunate, now misshapen scientist who created it). Of course, bullets and explosives have no effect on the creature, and the Air Force is finally called in to dispose of it. A minor continuity problem is present due to the use of stock footage of the Air Force jets (i.e., the planes shown taking off are not the same type shown during the attack). As has been stated before, the leader of the attacking jet squadron is portrayed by a young Clint Eastwood, barely recognizable behind his oxygen mask. The big spider is finally roasted to a crisp using napalm, and the world is once again safe from science run amock at the films conclusion.

***END OF SPOILERS***

The problems cited above are merely nagging details, and only a minor detraction from the overall effectiveness of the film. It remains entertaining and well paced, and if the problems are overlooked, it is worthwhile viewing for fans of science fiction.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Radioactive isotopes are at it again
chaos-rampant4 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The story is typical of its time and not interesting at all: atomic science goes wrong, humanity is revealed to be small and helpless in the face of forces it does not comprehend. It's funny how everything on the human end of horror is what we jeer at in bad slasher movies; the slow and lumbering threat fails to convince, and that is painfully underscored by having victims trip and fall over, cars that don't start, etc.

The monster end is of some (limited) appeal. A real spider was used, it helps a great deal.

The way it is incorporated into the human landscape is mostly good: imposing shots of beast and desert, both of equal stature and balanced; perspective play for tension - 'big' humans in the foreground, 'small' spider in the background, and reversed; pov camera from the spider's mouth for the kills.

The product of haywire technology is destroyed by even more haywire, destructive technology; napalm. The town solemnly watches as the creature is engulfed in flames. In about ten years time, the town would be a Vietnamese village.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bullets and dynamite can't stop a giant tarantula!
michaelRokeefe18 March 2001
An excellent example of early 50s horror. This is a black & white thriller that lets your imagination fill in the gory details. The aftermath is there to fuel the fear of the over grown tarantula. Leo G. Carroll plays a professor experimenting with a synthetic food stuff with intent to feed the crowded earth in 2000. His experiments on animals cause them to mature in three to six days. A rat can grow to the size of a dog in about 12 days. Two assistants die after injecting themselves with the secret supplement. The professor is injected while fighting off one of his dying helpers that is setting fire to the lab. An oversized tarantula escapes the fire to terrorize the area.

John Agar is the county doctor that leads in the destruction of the hairy legged menace. Mara Corday is the new assistant to the dying deformed professor. Character actors Nestor Paiva and Hank Patterson also star. And of note: very brief screen time for unknown Clint Eastwood as a jet fighter pilot and Bing Russell as a deputy.

I remember seeing this at the Saturday Kiddie Double Feature. My Milk Duds and Cherry Root Beer didn't last very long. Besides both hands were needed to hold on to the seat. This was pretty darn scary back then. Not to say it wouldn't scare a few grade schoolers today. Catch it on AMC or SFN and relive those days when we were frightened by an over grown anything. Bigger the scarier.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
In Jack Arnold's Line
ragosaal4 November 2006
I've always wondered if director Jack Arnold could have raised higher should he have been able to work with big budget products and top stars casts. Arnold was a very smart filmmaker with a most direct and plain style that gave us such "B" classic films in different genres as "The Creature from the Black Lagoon" and "The Incredible Shrinking Man" in the horror/sci-fi line, "No name on the Bullet" (Audie Murphy's best western no doubt) and even the fine comedy "The Mouse That Roared" (Peter Sellers was not a top star then). Who knows?

"Tarantula" is just another of Arnold's little "B" horror gems of the 50's, a most simple movie about insects turning huge to terrorize people, in this case the spider in the title. The film is interesting and enjoyable for fans of the genre (guilty!) and I remember it really scared me a lot when I saw it as a kid.

Though they would have never run for an Oscar John Agar, Mara Corday and Leo G. Carroll where very good in the main roles in a kind of film that was not about acting but about special effects and horrifying situations (just think for a second what it would be like to be chased by a hungry building size tarantula spider!).

All in all, "Tarantula" stands as a good piece in the "B" horror genre released by an intelligent director.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Itsy Bitsy Spider Climbs Up the Water Spout!
bsmith555222 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Tarantula" was one of a series of Sci/Fi/mutated monster films that were popular in the 1950s. This one is better than most.

A mutated man turns up dead in the desert. He turns out to be a scientist named Jacobs. He has apparently died from an affliction that takes several years to develop but has developed it in just a few days. Town doctor Matt Hastings (John Agar) becomes suspicious. Professor Gerald Deemer (Leo G. Carroll), Jacobs associate confirms that the man had died from the dreaded disease over a period of four days.

Later at Professor Deemer's lab we learn that he has been experimenting with a nutrient that accelerates the growth in animals and spiders (eeeuuu!). The professor is attacked by his other assistant Lund, who causes a fire during which a giant tarantula escapes. Before he dies, Lund injects the professor with the deadly nutrient.

The comely young Stephanie "Steve" Clayton arrives to take up a post with Jacobs, however since he is dead Professor Deemer takes her on. "Steve" and Matt become attracted to each other (who knew?). Meanwhile the escaped tarantula begins to wreak havoc killing animals and whatever people cross its path. The professor was unaware that the spider had not perished in the fire you see.

As the tarantula heads toward town, it stops to destroy the Professor's home...and the professor. To combat the giant spider the air force is called in and just as the jets are about to fire, I'm sure I heard the squadron leader say...Go ahead...make my day.

The special effects are quite good for a low budget "B" + movie. The tarantula effects are quite convincing. John Agar, who had been married to Shirley Temple, is nothing more than a card board hero whose main purpose in the film is to ride around in his brand new '55 Ford convertible. Mara Corday is lovely as the heroine and Leo G. Carroll adds an air of sophistication as the "mad scientist".

Others in the cast include Nestor Paiva as the Sheriff, Ross Elliott as the newspaper editor, Raymond Bailey as a scientist and good old Hank Patterson as the desk clerk Josh.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Definitely one of the classics
NerdBat7 November 2017
Man, with as many creature features like this that I've seen, I gotta say it's one of my favorites. I keep tarantulas as a hobby, and I've seen first hand how ferocious and awful they can be to their prey. The story is a great concept too, science being used for the good of mankind going awry when the movie makes its plot twist. The Spider is indestructible and it plays on the natural fears of mankind. The little clues it leaves behind, such as a puddle of venom in one scene, leads up to the main story perfectly. It leaves scientists in the fill scratching their heads, to make you feel as if it's truly happening. If you're a big fan of Retro science fiction, this film is a must see for you!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Good Edition To The DVD Sci-Fi Ultimate Package
ccthemovieman-121 October 2006
This is one of those films which starts off with a bang, slows down with a big lull in the middle section, and then finishes strong.

Kudos to the special-effects people to make the giant tarantula scenes look pretty good, even by today's standards some 50 years after this was made. Many times, the huge spider looks real while it's crawling down the road. I would like to have seen one or two more scenes of it in that middle section which would have kept viewers on edge throughout the film. Instead, it got a bit talky in spots.

Anyway, it still entertained and it was fun for me to see Leo G. Carroll, a guy I saw each week growing up watching "Topper" on television. Carroll played, by far, the most interesting character in this movie.

The acting was good in here, too, once again above '50s sci-fi standards. It was one of the better entries in the recently-released Sci-Fi Ultimate DVD set, offered at Best Buy. A pretty good transfer, too.
48 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very good effort for it's time.
RatedVforVinny26 November 2019
Good special effects for its day and one can imagine how scary it would have been for its time. Like the original Godzilla, contains some social comment of the (absolute apocalyptic) 'Cold War' nuclear age. Stars a youthful Clint Eastwood, which I think this was his very first screen performance. Better than expected.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A solid, though unspectacular vintage monster movie.
Idiot-Deluxe12 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Hmmm..... it would seem that every other reviewer rates this at 8 or 10 stars..... just what exactly am I missing here..... After looking through some of these reviews, I can quickly deduce that many of you are prone to over-rating and over-hyping this movie. Please, it's not THAT good.

Released in December of 1955 "Tarantula" is a capable, though fairly modest effort in the Sci-Fi/Horror genre and though it's far from being a great film, it's still one of the better "Big Bug Movies" Hollywood's churned out over the decades. The film stars John Agar in the lead role of Dr. Matt Hastings, who has many a dilemma to solve out in the arid wastes of the Arizona desert. Along for the ride comes a young and lovely Mara Corday as well as the great British character actor and Hitchcock favorite Leo G. Carroll, as scientists who are hard at work in developing a super-growth serum. But, as always, "something went terrible wrong" and trouble brews. Tarantula is well-acted, paced, photographed and it's effects, for the time, are about as good as to be expected, and yet unfortunately this film registers at only a very marginal level of entertainment.

On the plus-side many of same the people who where behind the iconic horror film "The Creature from the Black Lagoon" just the previous year, are also involved in Tarantula - only this time with far less memorable results. I might as well go ahead and say it, as if it's title isn't a total give-away in the first place, the film is centered around a massive, scientifically enhanced, Tarantula - which only gets bigger in size and ferocity as the movies goes. The last 10 to 15 minutes, when the spider attains it's maximum "house-wrecking" size of at least 100 tall, by 100 feet across, is when the movies at it's best. Also for a compliment I find that the end of Tarantula projects a similar vibe that King Kong's grand finale does (though in a much more modest way and on vastly less-inspired level), because ultimately Tarantula never really does get THAT exciting.

Judging by the looks of things the monster (ie giant tarantula) was brought to life solely through the use of photographic effects, primarily from the method of super-imposing footage of the subject, over the master-shot, that establishes the setting; which in this case is the mountainous deserts of Arizona and it's endless stretches of high-way that disappear into the horizon. In another sequence, a - house-wrecking affair - the monster is thrust front and center onto the screen and beautifully rendered, in the form of an extreme close-up, that which depicts the spiders head and multiple sets of eyes with an impressive level of detail, as it peers through a window - perhaps in admiration of Mara Corday. By this time the giant, mutated Tarantula is bigger then a house and it only getting bigger and BIGGER, as it rumbles towards it's inevitable demise.

As exciting as it might sound, I urge you to temper any enthusiasm and keep your expectations to a modest level, because like virtually all monster movies of the era Tarantula comes off as quite dated and modest in it's ability to entertain. Now had this been done using stop-motion photography, well then, undoubtedly, Tarantula would have been a more memorable picture; but as it stands the movies photographic effects are still vivid and feature some very effective, sharply detailed, close-ups. Musically Tarantula is impressive, featuring the dual compositional threat of both Henry Mancini and Herman Stein, their musical endeavors effectively lifts Tarantula above and beyond most of it's competition. The films striking score primarily alternates from string-filled moments of subtle serenity, to harsh, brass-driven moments of monstrous angst.

In the end Tarantula does provide the audience with a very satisfying death scene, as the monster is consumed in a raging firestorm. But for me, once was enough, as I find the movie lacks the necessary verve and excitement to warrant my attention, again. There's no doubt of it that had more money/inspiration been splashed it's way, this would have been a grand classic of the genre, unfortunately that's not the case here and Tarantula is merely a good movie, rather than a great one. There's one other thing that has come to my attention, which is the fact that Mara Corday had a habit of showing up in monster movies of the 50's. But as far as Tarantula is concerned, when compared to the likes of "The Black Scorpion" or the infamously terrible (and riotously hilarious) "The Giant Claw" it's the first and easily the best of Mara's monster movies.

Conclusion: Tarantula offers little in the way of replay value, but it's certainly worth watching once.

On a side-note, if you further want to explore the films of director Jack Arnold, I highly recommend that you see "The Incredible Shrinking Man", it's a more entertaining movie and also a much better example of his talent as a film director.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Top-of-the-Line Universal-Int'l Sci-Fi Thriller!
Harold_Robbins18 June 2005
This is a top-of-the-line Sci-Fi thriller from the studio that did 'em best in the 1950s - Universal-International. Produced by William Alland (who also produced "Creature From the Black Lagoon" and "It Came From Outer Space", and directed by Jack Arnold (who directed those films) it has an intelligent script and good acting all the way around. Arnold does a great job of building suspense as he cleverly keeps the titular monster mostly off-screen for the first 2/3 of the film until it's simply too big to hide. And then --- watch out, folks! As in many another sci-fi story, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and if there's a villain of the piece, it's the Nuclear Age - the spider of the title is merely doing it's natural thing: searching for food. Except that, thanks to Leo G. Carroll's well-meaning experiments (to increase the world's supply of food), this is one BIG spider with an equally BIG appetite! Universal's special effects department just about out-did themselves here - the matte work is almost flawless (check out Leo G. Carroll's house after the spider's visit), and the make-up department did excellent work as well. This is one of the best of it's kind, and great fun on a rainy Saturday afternoon.
36 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Things are about to get hairy.....
Prichards1234517 July 2006
Being something of an arachnophobe, this film scared me terrifically when I was a child. I saw it again on DVD a couple of days ago, and was surprised to see how well it holds up. The spider is genuinely effective and creepy. Arnold is very underrated as a director -he gives the film an eerie quality lacking in most of its contemporaries. Obviously inspired by "Them", it does not disgrace its source. I liked John Agar's performance; I understand Universal Pictures, to whom he was under contract, kept him in sci-fi monster movies when his pool-mates Rock Hudson and co went on to Stardom. A shame, because on this evidence he could have made it, too.

The script's references to Acromegalia are interesting, too. Not least as an unfortunate victim of the disease, Rondo Hatton, was a well-known contract-player on the Universal lot in the 1940s. Makes me wonder if he was the inspiration for this plot point.

Also - anyone notice the lift from the Dunwich Horror? The investigators surveying the aftermath of the trail of destruction? My own feeling is that Arnold, or somebody involved with the creation of his films, was into Lovecraft. Creature From The Black Lagoon appears to be inspired by The Deep Ones. At least to me.

All in all, highly recommended example of a fifties monster flick.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Entertaining, But By No Means Good
gavin694222 May 2011
A spider escapes from an isolated desert laboratory experimenting in giantism and grows to tremendous size as it wreaks havoc on the local inhabitants.

There are really only two things going for this film: one, a small uncredited role by Clint Eastwood that few if anyone will catch. And two, the fact the female lead calls herself "Steve". I just think that is the greatest nickname for a woman I ever heard.

Beyond that, it is what you expect. A tarantula in the background with terrorized people in the foreground. Director Jack Arnold uses the same tarantula (I assume) twice, also in "Incredible Shrinking Man"...
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed